This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk25: Good day, everyone, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q1 2024 BICOR Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during that session, you will need to press star 1-1 on your telephone. You will then hear a message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw the question, simply press star 1-1 again. please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference to Jim Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.
spk08: Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to Vicor Corporation's earnings call for the first quarter ended March 31, 2024. I'm Jim Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer, and I am in Andover with Bill Davies, Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing. Patrizio Vinciarelli, Chief Executive Officer, is joining the call from Washington, D.C., ahead of the upcoming patent infringement trial before the International Trade Commission. After the markets closed today, we issued a press release summarizing our financial results for the three months ending March 31st. This press release has been posted on the Investor Relations page of our website, www.vicorpower.com. We also filed a Form 8K today related to the issuance of this press release. I remind listeners this conference call is being recorded and is the copyrighted property of I-Corps Corporation. I also remind you various remarks we make during this call may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Except for historical information contained in this call, the matters discussed on this call, including any statements regarding current and planned products, current and potential customers, potential market opportunities, expected events and announcements, and our capacity expansion, as well as management's expectations for sales growth, spending, and profitability, are forward-looking statements involving risk and uncertainties. In light of these risks and uncertainties, we can offer no assurance that any forward-looking statement will, in fact, prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially from those explicitly set forth in or implied by any of our remarks today. The risks and uncertainties we face are discussed in Item 1A of our 2023 Form 10-K, which we filed with the SEC on February 28, 2024. This document is available via the EDGAR system on the SEC's website. Please note the information provided during this conference call is accurate only as of today, Tuesday, April 23, 2024. RICOR undertakes no obligation to update any statements, including forward-looking statements made during this call, and you should not rely upon such statements after the conclusion of this call. A webcast replay of today's call will be available shortly on the investor relations page of our website. I'll now turn to a review of our Q1 financial performance, after which Phil will review recent market developments, and Patricio, Phil, and I will take your questions. In my remarks, I will focus mostly on the sequential quarterly change for P&L and balance sheet items, as well as year-over-year changes, and refer you to our press release or our upcoming Form 10-Q for additional information. As stated in today's press release, FICO recorded total revenue for the first quarter of $83.9 million, down 9.5% from the fourth quarter, total of $92.7 million, and down 14.3% from the first quarter 2023, total of $97.8 million. BRIC product revenue declined 11.7% sequentially, while advanced product revenue declined 7.3% from the fourth quarter. Shipments to stocking distributors increased 21.8% sequentially. Exports for the first quarter decreased sequentially as a percentage of total revenue to approximately 42.6% from the prior quarter's 56.5%. For Q1, advanced product share of total revenue increased to 51.6% compared to 50.4% for the fourth quarter, with brick product share correspondingly decreasing to 48.4% of total revenue. Turning to Q1 gross margin, we recorded a consolidated gross profit margin of 53.8%, increasing approximately 2.7% from the prior quarter. A number of factors contributed to the sequential increase in gross margin percentage, including increased royalty income, improved sales mix, reductions in tariff spending, and lower freight costs. I'll now turn to Q1 operating expenses. Total operating expenses increased 10.1% from the fourth quarter, or $4 million, with the increase being primarily due to legal expenses incurred ahead of trial in our patent infringement case before the ITC. The amounts of total equity-based compensation expense for Q1 goods, SG&A, and R&D was $754,000, $1,919,000, and 1,107,000 respectively, totaling approximately 3.8 million. For Q1, we recorded operating income of 1.1 million, representing an operating margin of 1.3%. Turning to income taxes, we recorded a tax provision for Q1 of approximately 1.2 million, representing an effective tax rate for the quarter of 31.3%. Net income for Q1 totaled 2.6 million, GAAP diluted earnings per share with $0.06, based on a fully diluted share count of 45,031,000 shares. Turning to our cash flow and balance sheet, cash and cash equivalents totaled $239.2 million at Q1. Accounts receivable net of reserves totaled $57.6 million at quarter end, with DSOs for trade receivables at 47 days. Inventory's net reserves increased 5.4% sequentially to $112.3 million. Annualized inventory turns decreased sequentially to $1.71. Operating cash flow totaled approximately $2.7 million for the quarter. Capital expenditures for Q1 totaled $7.4 million. We ended the quarter with a construction and progress balance primarily for manufacturing equipment of approximately $13.6 million with approximately 17.8 million remaining to be spent. I'll now address bookings and backlog. Q1 book to bill came in below one and with one year backlog decreasing 6.5% from the prior quarter, closing at 150.3 million. As stated in our earnings call in February, 2024 is a year of uncertainty and opportunity. As of today, the quarterly and annual outcome in terms of top line and bottom line remain subject to a wide range of scenarios. Given the wide range of possible outcomes, we are unable to provide quarterly guidance until we are further along resolving uncertainties and capitalizing on opportunities. With that, Phil will provide an overview of recent market developments, and then Patricio, Phil, and I will take your questions. I ask that you limit yourself to one question and a related follow-up so that we can respond to as many of you as we can in the limited time available. If you have more than one topic to address, please get back in the queue. Phil?
spk06: Thank you, Jim. My remarks this quarter will build on Patricio's comments in the press release that we issued earlier today. As a reminder, Patricio commented, as we confront challenges and pursue opportunities, 2024 will be seen as the year in which our product strategy, selective licensing of intellectual property, and clarity of purpose secured VICO's future growth and profitability. So let's look at this from the point of view of our four business units and the growth opportunities each of them has with our top 100 customers. The current base of our business lies with the industrial business unit and the aerospace and defense business unit. This year we will release to production over 20 new high power density products that leverage our new ChipFab capabilities. These products utilize advances in our topologies, control systems, components, and packaging to raise the bar on power density and performance. From high-power regulated and fixed-ratio DC-DC converters to new AC-to-DC products aimed at the aerospace industry, to a new family of radiation-tolerant factorized power products for both LEO and MEO satellite constellation deployments. Customers from our top 100 are now designing advanced power systems for exciting new product launches that leverage electrification and autonomy in their systems. As part of our industrial and aerospace and defense strategies, we have also consolidated our distribution channel partners to large global distributors who have the customer base the reach and the market status needed to achieve our broad market growth goals. Our global channel partners Arrow and Avnet are now placing a higher focus on power conversion and power management as a strategic business and a major growth driver due to the electrification trends in broad industrial and transportation markets. They clearly recognize the advantages and differentiation that our high density power modules bring to their customer base. This quarter, we concluded a series of meetings with both channel partners jointly laying out clear strategies and targets for growth by focusing on specific vertical markets with a clear set of identified target customers globally that map to the numerous new products that we will launch in 2024. Technology licensing will become an expanding segment of our business portfolio and an important parallel path to our product revenues across our four business units. Licensing will enable more rapid scaling of our automotive market opportunity as we expand our relationships with OEMs and automotive Tier 1 suppliers. The automotive market in particular is aggressively looking for new technologies for both 48-volt zonal architectures onboard charging, and 800 to 48 volt powertrain conversion systems, which deliver high power density and low weight for electric vehicles. OEM technology licensing partnerships are a way to monetize and rapidly scale this business. Our HPC customer engagements continue to expand with a set of customers with target production dates now for new innovative and higher performance AI processors that will take full advantage of our Generation 5 vertical power delivery chipset. VPD is very strategic in achieving the power delivery, low power losses, and performance required. Electrical and thermal models representing the Gen 5 chips have now been delivered to leading customers, enabling their system simulations at processor currents up to 2,000 amps. We are on track to deliver evaluation systems and power module samples in Q2 and Q3 respectively. Q2 will be very busy for our automotive business unit as we host at the current count six customers at our new facility in Andover, Massachusetts. New collaborations and design-ins continue with significant new engagements with OEMs and Tier 1s in the Asia Pacific region. where investments in electric vehicles and 48-volt zonal architectures are leading the rest of the world. The team had a very successful WCX in Detroit once again this year with four technology papers that showcased our power module-based power system value propositions for 800-volt and 48-volt power trains. The new 48-volt zonal architecture will provide both product and OEM licensing revenue opportunities. Thank you. And with that, we will now take your questions.
spk25: Thank you. And as a reminder, press star 1-1 to get in the queue and wait for your name to be announced. To remove your question, simply press star 1-1 again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster.
spk12: One moment for our first question.
spk25: It comes from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company. Please proceed.
spk14: Hey, guys. I was wondering if you could start with, I think the ITC case is going to be heard next week, but I was hoping you could give us just sort of an update on the ITC schedule, what you expect to happen next week, and then what would you expect to sort of follow up over the summer until the expected decision date, which I believe is in early October. But anything you could sort of provide us on the, you know, what the next key milestones in the ITC case are would be helpful.
spk20: So to your point, the proceedings remain on schedule. There's going to be a trial next week. and a decision by the administrative law judge in September with a deadline of early October. We look forward to an outcome that we expect to be favorable to VIGO. We are on the right side of the issues, and our opponents are on the wrong side of the issues, and that's clear or should be clear to everybody. Again, we're going to trial, prepared, confident, or possibly outcome.
spk14: Great. And you had mentioned both in the press release and the prepared script that royalty revenue has continued to increase in the March quarter. Just wondering if you might be able to quantify that. How much of an uptick did you see in March? And then would you expect that royalty line to continue to grow through the remaining quarters of 2024?
spk20: So generally, we expect the royalty contribution to our revenues and bottom line to continue to expand as far as we can see. And there may be a set of events that occur at certain points in time. But typically, we're taking a very long-term view with respect to the opportunity and approaching it with the right balance in terms of vigorous interest as well as the interest of OEMs that, you know, elect to take a license as opposed to potentially being confronted with, you know, line down situations following exclusion.
spk14: Got it. I'll go back in the queue. Thank you.
spk19: Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from the line of Richard Shannon with Craig Hallam. Please proceed.
spk15: Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. I guess I've got a couple of interlocking questions on your 5G second-gen PPD product here. I guess I want to get a sense of kind of the milestones that we should expect to see over the next coming quarters towards getting bookings and eventual revenues here. I think in the past you've talked about models and tool delivery, which I think I heard some detail that I missed some of that. I think last quarter you talked about maybe some more equipment needed to be delivered to support that. And then anything about manufacturing experience required for, you know, essentially the larger customers to have confidence in the ramp here. Kind of detail that, what we should be looking for this year. That'd be great, please.
spk20: Sure. So let's start with the revenue opportunity. I think as we make clear in prior calls, 5G is not a 2024 revenue opportunity. It's revenue opportunity starting 2025. This is a year of delivery of solutions to initial key customers, and we're far along, particularly with one, and before too long with more. So I will look again at 2024 as bringing this development effort to fruition, you know, setting the stage, with some leading customers before we get into production volumes next year.
spk15: Okay. Let me follow up in kind of looking at this 5G opportunity a different way and certainly understanding, as you said last quarter, that this is not the year for 5G revenues at all here. But I guess, do you expect to be able to intersect with the first generation of three nanometer accelerators, CPUs, whatever is out there? to be ready by then, or is that something you might be lagging the leading edge there?
spk20: I would say that we have high expectations, both premised on our capability, the much higher current density, the other performance attributes of our 5G VPD solution, which is what we call a second-generation VPD. distinct from the first-generation by itself pioneering and which is being practiced by competitors with a great deal of difficulty from the performance perspective, from the reliability perspective, and last but not least, from the intellectual property perspective. So we believe that customers with the visibility to all the issues and were engaged with some of them, understand that to get to reliable, scalable, and not challenged by intellectual property issues, Viagra is the source. And there's, at this point in time, no other source for a VPD system that works well, that is scalable, and that is not devoid of intellectual property challenges.
spk12: Okay. Fair enough. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please.
spk12: All right.
spk25: One moment. It comes from the line of John Tanguantang with JS Securities. Please proceed.
spk10: Hi. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions. I was wondering if you could give us an update on the potential for lateral vertical product shipping. if that might contribute to 24, 25, and if there's active programs in the pipeline for that.
spk20: I'm sorry, I missed the potential for which, if you could.
spk10: Lateral vertical products, so the in-between product.
spk20: Yes, so I think as it turns out, the potential is limited. I will let Phil fill in with more color on this with a global view because the answer depends on which particular end market we're looking for. Phil?
spk06: Yeah, so we do have, still have engagement with customers on lateral vertical designs. We've also seen lateral vertical be used with some reference designs for the network uh, communications market for the, um, you know, the, the Broadcom Marvell type of processes from some of the contract manufacturers in Asia. Um, so I, there could still be some revenues on lateral vertical at towards the, uh, the end of this year, early next year. Um, so that, that's still a potential for us.
spk10: Got it. Thank you. And then, so you mentioned something about, um, Stephen Handler- licensing and enabling more rapid scaling automotive, are you allowing your partners there to produce your designs or is it something more similar to the current status quo, where you are allowing people to use your IP, you know from different vendors it's like like it's happening HPC markets.
spk20: So we are open to the opportunity for selective licensing in, among others, the automotive market. And there's been some expression of interest with respect to that. It's predicated on the distinct attributes of our solutions. And I'm referring to solutions involving 400 volts with 100 volts, bus conversion, as well as other solutions, including so-called zone architecture, which is once again something that DIGOR conceived of 10 years ago and with respect to which we have intellectual property. So we have a number of opportunities in the Alamori Valley in particular. There are some that are now beginning to develop also related to ACDC. I do expect that Over time, some of these opportunities may turn into licensing deals.
spk10: Okay, great. Thank you. And then finally, Jim, could you break out the legal expense in the quarter and what you expect over the next two or three as the ITC case wraps up?
spk08: Like we said on the in prepared remarks legal expense was the primary driver of the four million dollar equivalent law effects I would stop short of trying to predict the future on that John and I might like Patricio comment as well because he's obviously been very close to all of it Yeah, so to Jim's point in that quarter there was a significant step up from already leading to a
spk20: you know, preparations for the upcoming trial next week. We are not in a position to forecast the evolution of legal expenses. You know, frankly, they could keep stepping up, they could level off, or they could come down depending on a variety of scenarios. So, I think if you wanted to pick one among those three scenarios, Keeping it pretty much level would be probably the middle of the road alternative, but it could step up again because of additional actions we might take.
spk09: Understood. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. It comes from the line of Don McKenna of DB McKenna and Company. Please proceed.
spk13: Thank you. Patricio, the comments on future sales opportunities, again, are pretty positive. And with the exception of last quarter, the outlook has always been quite positive. And if you go back and read the transcripts, it's obvious that the potential markets that you envisioned and the superior products that you're offering today just haven't produced the results you would hope for. And I'm wondering what you've learned from that failure to capture the potential and what changes you've made in your approach to improve the sales and profitability.
spk20: So as suggested in my quotes, we believe we are executing well with a clear vision of what challenges and opportunities are. And frankly, I think there's a big part of the answer to your question that has to do with the vagaries of what has been going on with certain leading OEMs, where their priorities have taken them in terms of product development. And to keep it at the very high and general level, I would say that from our visibility, a unique perspective with respect to the evolution of our system requirements. Some of the choices that have been made with certain OEMs are going to get those OEMs into a real bind, both in terms of the performance of their platforms, and more importantly, their competitive standing relative to other companies that are aspiring to capture market share and they see the opportunity of leveraging a superior power system technology from Vigo. So I guess I'm not apologetic with respect to how we got to where we are. We don't control our destiny in every respect. Obviously, we make exceeding decisions with respect to strategy and how we're going to make the most of the opportunity, both in terms of FAB our 5G technology, and importantly, our intellectual property. And I would say that I'm quite satisfied with how we got to where we are, and I think we have tremendous opportunity. It takes perseverance, clarity of vision, persistence. We have all those traits, and we expect to, before too long, capitalize on the opportunity.
spk13: I realize it's very difficult for you to try to make any projections on the short term. Can you give us some kind of a feel for where you would expect revenues as a percentage increase over current, let's say, three years down the road? What would you be satisfied with?
spk20: I don't know that I can honestly give you numbers or general expectations without substantial risk in either direction. I think I can say that we do expect to fill our FAB. As we know, the FAB has got a billion dollars worth of capacity and maybe a little more than that. We're going to be able to fill that FAB with opportunities relating to you know, 5G in AI, in the center type of applications, as well as automotive applications. And generally speaking to Phil's earlier point, our top 100 customers in diversified several markets.
spk13: And would you expect to fill that tab in the next three years?
spk20: I do expect that that will happen. I don't know if Phil wants to add some color to this,
spk06: No, I would just say that that's the objective, is to achieve that and to do it with the broad-based market, with our distribution channel on the broad-based level, but also the top 100 focus. And we're making great progress across the four BUs with the top 100. And the new products that we're introducing this year, not just the Gen 5, but new high-power front end, products are getting designed into these top 100 customers that we're now focused on. I'm confident that we'll fill the fat. I think that some exciting times are ahead of us.
spk11: Great. Thanks, guys. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. It comes from the line of Alan Hicks with Ainsley Capital. Please proceed.
spk18: Yeah, good afternoon. I think I heard you say 48% on BBU and 50% on advanced products. Was that correct?
spk20: I'm sorry. Could you repeat that? I'm a little bit handicapped here with my audio today.
spk18: Okay. On the percentage of revenues, advanced products, I think, were a little over 50%, and BBU was a little over 48%. Was that correct?
spk20: That's correct. For the past quarter, yeah, the mix between advanced products and brick products changed.
spk18: Okay. So could we assume that royalties were that other 2%?
spk02: I'm sorry, the royalties were?
spk18: The differential added up to 98% roughly. Would the differential be roughly 2%?
spk20: I wouldn't make that assumption. I don't know that I can give you a quantitative measure here. I know as part of our reporting, and maybe Jim can comment on that. He can point you to where you can find additional information.
spk08: Yeah. Alan, the better way to think about it is we said 51.6% advance, 48.4 BRIC, which is 100%. And, you know, the realty income is associated with advanced products.
spk18: Okay. Last quarter it was $7 million, I believe. Did it grow significantly from last quarter? It grew.
spk05: It did grow and stepped up significantly. substantially from last quarter.
spk18: OK. And there's the factory.
spk16: Are the gross margins also improving on the factory?
spk03: Sorry, go ahead, Patricio.
spk20: OK. Well, so needless to say, capacity recession in the factory is an issue, was an issue as of the last quarter, still going to be an issue this quarter. And the fact that the revenues, particularly prior revenues, took a step down last quarter didn't help with respect to margins. But all the factors that Jim pointed to in his remarks, including beyond licensing income, reduction in tariffs, changing mix, federal mix, This contributed to a significant improvement in total gross margins. And that's the trend line that we are satisfied with. I think we represent in the past that we have a goal to achieve substantially higher margins. And that goal is supported by the strategies that we're implementing and executing with the mix of further advances with respect to our product capabilities, as well as the complementary element of, in effect, monetizing some of the value or IP through selective licensing.
spk18: So I think those gross margins were easily the best you've ever had. Gift Bank was 53.6%.
spk20: I think gross margins for the quarter, Jim, correct me if I'm wrong, but 53 and change, right?
spk08: Yeah, so I can comment on that, Alan, actually. So 53.8 was the result last quarter, and that was the highest for sure since I've been at Vicor.
spk18: I've got going back over 20 years, so that's the highest I've ever seen. Do you expect that to continue to grow the rest of the year based on royalty increases?
spk20: Again, we're not going to be making detailed quarterly prediction in a year in which so much could happen. So I think we're just going to have to, the ones among us that are invested in VIGO for the long term are going to look at this. I think one of the analysts asked a question in the last call about 2024 being, quote unquote, the transition year. I think at the time, I didn't embrace the characterization. I think in hindsight, it's probably the better way of looking at it. This is a year of transition in which, in effect, a lot of things are going to change, and I would expect for the better.
spk18: Okay. I was at the NVIDIA conference, I think it was February or last month, And I stopped by the Delta Bruce, and I asked about the NBM product. And they showed it to me and said, we're not infringing because we have a different process. I don't know. That's all they said, and they kind of shut up. But can you comment on that?
spk20: Yeah, the leather BNS came to mind. The fact is that their copycat product infringes three of our patents. And thus far, the proceedings corroborated that expectation. So let's wait and see, you know, what happens with what I expect to be an exclusion order against them.
spk18: Okay. And just a quick question on that. There was a product, I think it was showed at the WCX that had DC-DC converter, 150,000 watts, I think. Is that for charging stations? Phil, could you answer that?
spk06: Yeah, that was the PSU, Patricio, the demo, the five paralleled MBMs in the PSU, the 150 kilowatt onboard 800 to 400 volt charger. That was on demo. Well, we had it in the case, not powered up, but WCX.
spk17: Is there application for charging stations?
spk20: That's an application for fast charging, and it's an application where we have a major weight advantage as well as a major efficiency advantage. So that system comprising at the moment five of our modules, and in fact we'll be able to get to the 150 kilowatt capability with a reduced number of four. You know, that system sports a peak efficiency of over 99%, and it has, you know, astronomical power density, meaning its volume measured in liters and weight measured in kilograms is a small fraction of any competitive unit. So that would go both in the car and the charging station? No, this is a device that certain automakers are going to incorporate within the vehicle in order to facilitate flexible charging.
spk18: OK. How far away are you from design wins there?
spk20: We have design wins with two smaller automakers.
spk18: OK. And 1 last question you say, you're going to fill the factory to 1Billion and. 3 years or whatever so that's in addition to whatever are also manufacturing or licensing your products.
spk20: Feel I'm having a hard time here with my audio. Could you respond to that?
spk06: Yes. So, our goal is product revenues out of the factory at, as Patricio said, just over a 1Billion dollars out of that new fab. And, uh. But we are licensing activities adding to that, yes.
spk18: Okay. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from the line of John Dillon with DMV Capital. Please proceed.
spk28: Hi, guys. Thanks a lot for taking my questions. I appreciate it. Bill, now that your factory is finished and we're seeing processors at 1,000 watts and higher coming to the market, and also in your prepared remarks, I think I heard you say target production dates for HPC, when will we start seeing evidence of GPUs from major manufacturers using the BiQuare POL solutions?
spk06: So I think Patricio talked about that, John. I think that, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, we're delivering electrical, mechanical, thermal models to leading customers right now. Then we'll follow that up at the end of Q2 with a demo system that they'll be able to check out hardware and test the models against the demo system. And then we'll be sampling towards the end of Q3 And we expect production probably towards the second half of 2025. That's when we'll have vertical power delivery in production.
spk29: Is that what you were referring to?
spk20: There's one notable customer, though, that may well be in production come the very beginning of next year. And for that customer, the hardware is due to be delivered in the summer months.
spk28: Excellent. And Phil, is that the target production dates that you were talking about, or is that something different?
spk06: No, that's the target production dates, yeah.
spk28: Gotcha. And are there current Gen 4 designs in production or about to go in production that will act as a bridge to the Gen 5?
spk06: Yeah, we have some Gen 4 design wins, but again, as Patricio pointed out, there have been some market shifts with people changing strategies with supply chain considerations ahead of performance and technology, but vertical power delivery comes along. We have, with the Gen 5 technology, an incredible solution with the current density that we can get to 3x over what the competition will be. So I think there'll be some really hard reassessments being made as we move forward here with a number of accounts. But we'll see that happen. But we have some very good interest from the accounts that are building really big investments into AI and developing their own processor chips. And they're the people that you would expect. And we have great engagements with them right now. I'm confident Gen 5 is going to be all that it can be, and we're going to be having a very exciting 2025.
spk28: And you're pretty confident, then, that the productization schedule will stay on schedule?
spk06: I'm personally confident. Patricio, you want to comment on that? But I certainly am.
spk20: I'm also confident. We're leveraging, for the most part, processes and equipment that we have installed and have fully vetted. There are a few process steps that are going to be used in order to scale up capacity, not to deliver initial units that are still under some level of refinement. But generally speaking, the capability is in place, and we have a fab with the capacity to build very, very large quantities of panels and see some solutions for customers.
spk28: So you guys have working alpha or beta product right now?
spk20: So we have a lead customer that we're going to be delivering functional systems. We started some initial partial delivery, but we're going to be delivering complete systems in late June, July timeframe. Excellent. So the lead application to be followed by others as we get into the other part of the year.
spk28: Excellent. I'll get back in the queue. Thank you very much. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from the line of Quim Bolton with Needham and Company. Please proceed.
spk14: Hey, Jim, just a question on the royalty, how it works. The royalty revenue you recognized in the first quarter, is that for shipments of your licensee that took place a quarter and a year or so effectively, shipments in the fourth calendar quarter of last year? or is it sort of for shipments that took place in one queue of 24?
spk04: It's real-time.
spk08: It's based on shipments that basically they take receipt of. But it's not in arrears. It's in the quarter.
spk14: Okay, perfect. And then just sort of following up on John's question around the Gen 5 deliveries, The lead customer for Gen 5, I assume that that's a data center or sort of AI or HPC application, but just wondering if you could give us in broad strokes what sort of the application is for that first Gen 5 customer.
spk20: It's within the confines you just defined, but at this point in time, We really don't want to be specific. We want to give this customer the full advantage of being first and having an elemental surprise. But it's within the general field that you identify. Got it. Got it. Okay. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from the line of Richard Shannon of Craig Callum. Please proceed.
spk15: Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my follow-on question here. I guess, Phil, following on your prepared remarks here, which has probably had as much focus outside of HBC as we've heard in some time here, and you kind of alluded to this at your shareholders meeting last year as well, but in that context, give us a some sort of understanding of a split of your advanced product revenues between HPC and other applications. And then also, if you might just give us a flavor of how much of that advanced product segment is also point of load versus bridging and other kinds of functionality.
spk06: So today, the advanced product revenues are
spk08: The advanced product revenue last quarter was 51.6%. About 52% of the total company.
spk06: Yeah, and the bulk of that was, well, a number of it was into EPC. There's quite a bit of it's now going into industrial. And I think the early days in automotive, as everyone knows, that's growing quite new electronic wall and fence and aerospace applications, you know, like the space satellite application that we've been talking about. We're getting more design wins there. So it's really spread amongst those three business units, excluding automotive, Richard.
spk20: Okay, that's helpful. I would add to that that, you know, the strategy that Phil outlined with data diversification among different end markets with different traits and different sets of opportunities, that's fully supported by a product strategy that leverages commonality of, you know, power conversion engines, control systems, packaging technology, So we are able to, in effect, address market needs in markets and markets that may appear to be somewhat distant, like test equipment on the one hand and, you know, high current point of load VP data applications. You know, with modules, in particular 5G type modules, they're essentially the same. And that sets us apart. in another way relative to, you know, the competition, so to speak.
spk15: Okay. Thanks for all that detail. And a quick follow-on question for Patricio. You talked about, you know, consistently from the time that we've covered you and, frankly, a lot longer about having a distinct advantage in terms of power delivery at very high currents. You talked about delivering samples or whatever to customers up to 2,000 amps. I wonder if you characterize the competitive dynamics here in the future with 5G in the terms of above what do you think you're going to be the only credible solution up there? Is that at 1,000 amps or a lot of that, just any characterization so we can think about this as we see the next generation of accelerators come to market?
spk20: So we've enabled systems they're already up to a few tens of thousands of amperes on a wafer. I would say that's the most advanced solution in terms of power system capability and, from what I can tell, compute capability in the market. obviously cutting edge and far above the more common denominator type of applications, which as Phil suggested earlier, are trending up to the 2000 app level. So we're involved in one important development with a major OEM at the 2000 app level. At that level, fundamentally, you need VPD, and you need an in-adapt form of VPD, such as what we call second-gen VPD. Yes, you could try to do it with the third-gen VPD that has been copied to a high degree by competitors, But what you'd be stuck with is a system, a power system that involves modules that are very heavy, very thick, thermally inept, difficult to cool, with very poor yields in assembly and reliability issues, not to mention the AP issues alluded to earlier. So we see the market in AI in particular, quickly getting past the thousand app level and fundamentally left with VPD-only solutions. Lateral is out. Even lateral vertical while achieving significant benefits relative to lateral, not as good as vertical. And fundamentally, what's going to be needed is a more advanced version of VPD that doesn't bring about the stacking challenges that characterize first-generation VPD as vigo-pioneered and palliative.
spk12: Okay, great. Thank you, guys.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. All right, our last question comes from John Tan Wanting with CJS Securities. Please proceed.
spk10: Hi, thanks for taking one more from me. I was wondering if you could update us just on the uptake of automotive and when you expect to start shipping in volume those products. I think you've said for a number of years now that you expect a 25% to be the year that automotive really starts shipping and making a difference. I'm wondering if that remains on track and if that's going to be a good source of growth even before your VPD products start shipping in the second half of 25.
spk06: Hi, John. This is Phil. So, no, the timing for automotive is really 26, 27 from, you know, reasonable revenue ramps beginning. There may be opportunities in Asia Pacific, conversations that we've had in the last six months that could pull that in, but those are yet to develop, so it's too early to talk about those yet. But this is really a 26, 27 story for automotive. Although we will begin, as I mentioned, I think last quarter or even in my remarks the quarter before, production, early production at the end of this year. for high-performance applications. So I think that that's sort of the timeframe that we're on with automotive.
spk10: Okay, got it. If you were to characterize what could be a bridge market between then and now, which one would be the most likely to drive some sort of upside, whether it be HPC or automotive or some of these other applications you're talking about?
spk06: Yeah, HPC is definitely number one, and I think that we are, again, as I mentioned, seeing very good design-ins and wins in industrial, defense, and aerospace. So there's going to be some really good growth at good margins coming from those markets, but HPC and Gen 5 could just completely dominate that. Got it.
spk10: Thank you, guys.
spk25: Thank you. I'm not showing any further questions in the queue. Thank you.
spk07: Okay, thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for joining.
spk25: And with that, everybody, we appreciate your participation, and you may now disconnect. you you
spk22: Thank you.
spk25: Good day, everyone, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q1 2024 BICOR Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during that session, you will need to press star 1-1 on your telephone. You will then hear a message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw the question, simply press star 1-1 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference to Jim Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.
spk08: Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to Vicor Corporation's earnings call for the first quarter ended March 31, 2024. I'm Jim Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer, and I am in Andover with Bill Davies, Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing. Patrizio Vinciarelli, Chief Executive Officer, is joining the call from Washington, D.C., ahead of the upcoming patent infringement trial before the International Trade Commission. After the markets closed today, we issued a press release summarizing our financial results for the three months ending March 31st. This press release has been posted on the Investor Relations page of our website, www.vicorpower.com. We also filed a Form 8K today related to the issuance of this press release. I remind listeners this conference call is being recorded and is the copyrighted property of I-Corps Corporation. I also remind you various remarks we make during this call may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Except for historical information contained in this call, the matters discussed on this call, including any statements regarding current and planned products, current and potential customers, potential market opportunities, expected events and announcements, and our capacity expansion, as well as management's expectations for sales growth, spending, and profitability, are forward-looking statements involving risk and uncertainties. In light of these risks and uncertainties, we can offer no assurance that any forward-looking statement will, in fact, prove to be correct. Actual results may differ materially from those explicitly set forth in or implied by any of our remarks today. The risks and uncertainties we face are discussed in Item 1A of our 2023 Form 10-K, which we filed with the SEC on February 28, 2024. This document is available via the EDGAR system on the SEC's website. Please note the information provided during this conference call is accurate only as of today, Tuesday, April 23, 2024. RICOR undertakes no obligation to update any statements, including forward-looking statements made during this call, and you should not rely upon such statements after the conclusion of this call. A webcast replay of today's call will be available shortly on the investor relations page of our website. I'll now turn to a review of our Q1 financial performance, after which Phil will review recent market developments, and Patricio, Phil, and I will take your questions. In my remarks, I will focus mostly on the sequential quarterly change for P&L and balance sheet items, as well as year-over-year changes, and refer you to our press release for our upcoming Form 10-Q for additional information. As stated in today's press release, FICO recorded total revenue for the first quarter of $83.9 million, down 9.5% from the fourth quarter, total of $92.7 million, and down 14.3% from the first quarter 2023, total of $97.8 million. BRIC product revenue declined 11.7% sequentially, while advanced product revenue declined 7.3% from the fourth quarter. Shipments to stocking distributors increased 21.8% sequentially. Exports for the first quarter decreased sequentially as a percentage of total revenue to approximately 42.6% from the prior quarter's 56.5%. For Q1, advanced product share of total revenue increased to 51.6% compared to 50.4% for the fourth quarter, with brick product share correspondingly decreasing to 48.4% of total revenue. Turning to Q1 gross margin, we recorded a consolidated gross profit margin of 53.8%, increasing approximately 2.7% from the prior quarter. A number of factors contributed to the sequential increase in gross margin percentage, including increased royalty income, improved sales mix, reductions in tariff spending, and lower freight costs. I'll now turn to Q1 operating expenses. Total operating expenses increased 10.1% from the fourth quarter, or $4 million, with the increase being primarily due to legal expenses incurred ahead of trial in our patent infringement case before the ITC. The amounts of total equity-based compensation expense for Q1 goods, SG&A, and R&D was $754,000, $1,919,000, and 1,107,000 respectively, totaling approximately 3.8 million. For Q1, we recorded operating income of 1.1 million, representing an operating margin of 1.3%. Turning to income taxes, we recorded a tax provision for Q1 of approximately 1.2 million, representing an effective tax rate for the quarter of 31.3%. Net income for Q1 totaled 2.6 million, GAAP diluted earnings per share with $0.06, based on a fully diluted share count of 45,031,000 shares. Turning to our cash flow and balance sheet, cash and cash equivalents totaled $239.2 million at Q1. Accounts receivable net of reserves totaled $57.6 million at quarter end, with DSOs for trade receivables at 47 days. Inventory's net reserves increased 5.4% sequentially to $112.3 million. Annualized inventory turns decreased sequentially to $1.71. Operating cash flow totaled approximately $2.7 million for the quarter. Capital expenditures for Q1 totaled $7.4 million. We ended the quarter with a construction and progress balance primarily for manufacturing equipment of approximately $13.6 million and with approximately 17.8 million remaining to be spent. I'll now address bookings and backlog. Q1 book to bill came in below one and with one year backlog decreasing 6.5% from the prior quarter, closing at 150.3 million. As stated in our earnings call in February, 2024 is a year of uncertainty and opportunity. As of today, the quarterly and annual outcome in terms of top line and bottom line remain subject to a wide range of scenarios. Given the wide range of possible outcomes, we are unable to provide quarterly guidance until we are further along resolving uncertainties and capitalizing on opportunities. With that, Phil will provide an overview of recent market developments, and then Patricio, Phil, and I will take your questions. I ask that you limit yourself to one question and a related follow-up so that we can respond to as many of you as we can in the limited time available. If you have more than one topic to address, please get back in the queue. Phil?
spk06: Thank you, Jim. My remarks this quarter will build on Patricio's comments in the press release that we issued earlier today. As a reminder, Patricio commented, as we confront challenges and pursue opportunities, 2024 will be seen as the year in which our product strategy, selective licensing of intellectual property, and clarity of purpose secured VICO's future growth and profitability. So let's look at this from the point of view of our four business units and the growth opportunities each of them has with our top 100 customers. The current base of our business lies with the industrial business unit and the aerospace and defense business unit. This year, we will release to production over 20 new high-power density products that leverage our new chip fab capabilities. These products utilize advances in our topologies, control systems, components, and packaging to raise the bar on power density and performance. From high power regulated and fixed ratio DC-DC converters to new AC to DC products aimed at the aerospace industry, to a new family of radiation tolerant factorized power products for both LEO and MEO satellite constellation deployments. Customers from our top 100 are now designing advanced power systems for exciting new product launches that leverage electrification and autonomy in their systems. As part of our industrial and aerospace and defense strategies, we have also consolidated our distribution channel partners to large global distributors who have the customer base the reach and the market status needed to achieve our broad market growth goals. Our global channel partners Arrow and Avnet are now placing a higher focus on power conversion and power management as a strategic business and a major growth driver due to the electrification trends in broad industrial and transportation markets. They clearly recognize the advantages and differentiation that our high density power modules bring to their customer base. This quarter, we concluded a series of meetings with both channel partners jointly laying out clear strategies and targets for growth by focusing on specific vertical markets with a clear set of identified target customers globally that map to the numerous new products that we will launch in 2024. Technology licensing will become an expanding segment of our business portfolio and an important parallel path to our product revenues across our four business units. Licensing will enable more rapid scaling of our automotive market opportunity as we expand our relationships with OEMs and automotive Tier 1 suppliers. The automotive market in particular is aggressively looking for new technologies for both 48-volt zonal architectures onboard charging, and 800 to 48 volt powertrain conversion systems, which deliver high power density and low weight for electric vehicles. OEM technology licensing partnerships are a way to monetize and rapidly scale this business. Our HPC customer engagements continue to expand with a set of customers with target production dates now for new innovative and higher performance AI processes that will take full advantage of our Generation 5 vertical power delivery chipset. VPD is very strategic in achieving the power delivery, low power losses, and performance required. Electrical and thermal models representing the Gen 5 chips have now been delivered to leading customers, enabling their system simulations at processor currents up to 2,000 amps. We are on track to deliver evaluation systems and power module samples in Q2 and Q3 respectively. Q2 will be very busy for our automotive business unit as we host at the current count six customers at our new facility in Andover, Massachusetts. New collaborations and design-ins continue with significant new engagements with OEMs and Tier 1s in the Asia-Pacific region. where investments in electric vehicles and 48-volt zonal architectures are leading the rest of the world. The team had a very successful WCX in Detroit once again this year with four technology papers that showcased our power module-based power system value propositions for 800-volt and 48-volt power trains. The new 48-volt zonal architecture will provide both product and OEM licensing revenue opportunities. Thank you. And with that, we will now take your questions.
spk25: Thank you. And as a reminder, press star 1-1 to get in the queue and wait for your name to be announced. To remove your question, simply press star 1-1 again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster.
spk12: One moment for our first question.
spk25: It comes from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company. Please proceed.
spk14: Hey, guys. I was wondering if you could start with, I think the ITC case is going to be heard next week, but I was hoping you could give us just sort of an update on the ITC schedule, what you expect to happen next week, and then what would you expect to sort of follow up over the summer until the expected decision date, which I believe is in early October. But anything you could sort of provide us on the, you know, what the next key milestones in the ITC case are would be helpful.
spk20: So to your point, the proceedings remain on schedule. There's going to be a trial next week. and a decision by the administrative law judge in September with the deadline of early October. We look forward to an outcome that we expect to be favorable to Viagra. We are on the right side of the issues and our opponents are on the wrong side of the issues and that's clear or should be clear to everybody. Again, we're going to trial, prepared, confident, or possibly outcome.
spk14: Great. And you had mentioned both in the press release and the prepared script that royalty revenue has continued to increase in the March quarter. Just wondering if you might be able to quantify that. How much of an uptick did you see in March? And then would you expect that royalty line to continue to grow through the remaining quarters of 2024?
spk20: So generally, we expect the royalty contribution to our revenues and bottom line to continue to expand as far as we can see. And there may be a step up events that occur at certain points in time. But typically we're taking a very long-term view with respect to the opportunity and approaching it with the right balance in terms of VIGO's interest as well as the interest of OEMs that, you know, elect to take a license as opposed to potentially being confronted with, you know, line down situations following exclusion.
spk14: I'll go back in the queue. Thank you. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from the line of Richard Shannon with Craig Hallam. Please proceed.
spk15: Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. I guess I've got a couple of interlocking questions on your 5G second-gen PPD product here. I guess I want to get a sense of kind of the milestones that we should expect to see over the next coming quarters for getting bookings and eventual revenues here. I think in the past you've talked about models and tool delivery, which I think I heard some detail that I missed some of that. I think last quarter you talked about maybe some more equipment needed to be delivered to support that. And then anything about manufacturing experience required for, you know, essentially the larger customers to have confidence in the ramp here. Kind of detail that, what we should be looking for this year. That'd be great.
spk20: Sure. So let's start with the revenue opportunity. I think as we make clear in prior calls, 5G is not a 2024 revenue opportunity. It's revenue opportunity starting 2025. This is a year of delivery of solutions to initial key customers and we're far along, particularly with one and before too long with more. So I will look again at 2024 as bringing this development effort to fruition, you know, setting the stage with some leading customers before we get into production volumes next year.
spk15: Okay. Let me follow up in kind of looking at this 5G opportunity a different way and certainly understanding, as you said last quarter, that this is not the year for 5G revenues at all here. But I guess, do you expect to be able to intersect with the first generation of three nanometer accelerators, CPUs, whatever is out there? to be ready by then, or is that something you might be lagging the leading edge there?
spk20: I would say that we have high expectations, both premised on our capability, the much higher current density, the other performance attributes of our 5G VPD solution, which is what we call a second-generation VPD, distinct from the first-generation value self-pioneering and which is being practiced by competitors with a great deal of difficulty from the performance perspective, from the reliability perspective, and last but not least, from the intellectual property perspective. So we believe that customers with the visibility to all the issues and were engaged with some of them, understand that to get to reliable, scalable, and not challenged by intellectual property issues, Viagra is the source. And there's, at this point in time, no other source for a VPD system that works well, that is scalable, and that is not devoid of intellectual property challenges.
spk15: Okay. Fair enough. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please.
spk12: All right.
spk25: One moment. It comes from the line of John Tanguantang with JS Securities. Please proceed.
spk10: Hi. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions. I was wondering if you could give us an update on the potential for lateral vertical product shipping. if that might contribute to 24, 25, and if there's active programs in the pipeline for that.
spk20: I'm sorry, I missed the potential for which?
spk10: Lateral vertical products, so the in-between products.
spk20: Yes, so I think as it turns out, the potential is limited. I will let Phil fill in with more color on this with a global view, because the answer depends on which particular end market we're looking for. Phil?
spk06: Yeah, so we do still have engagement with customers on lateral vertical designs. We've also seen lateral vertical be used with some reference designs for the network uh, communications market for the, um, you know, the, the Broadcom Marvell type of processes from some of the contract manufacturers in Asia. Um, so I, there could still be some revenues on lateral vertical at towards the, uh, the end of this year, early next year. Um, so that, that's still a potential for us.
spk10: Got it. Thank you. And then, so you mentioned something about, um, Stephen Handler- licensing and enabling more rapid scaling automotive are you allowing your partners there to produce your designs or is it something more similar to the current status quo, where you are allowing people to use your IP, you know from different vendors it's like like it's happening HPC markets.
spk20: So we are open to the opportunity for selective licensing in, among others, the automotive market. And there's been some expression of interest with respect to that. It's predicated on the distinct attributes of our solutions. And I'm referring to solutions involving 400 volts with 100 volts, bus conversion, as well as other solutions, including so-called zone architecture, which is, once again, something that DIGOR conceived of 10 years ago and with respect to which we have intellectual property. So, we have a number of opportunities in the Otomo River in particular. There are some that are now beginning to develop also related to ACDC. I do expect that Over time, some of these opportunities may turn into licensing deals.
spk10: Okay, great. Thank you. And then finally, Jim, could you break out the legal expense in the quarter and what you expect over the next two or three as the ITC case wraps up?
spk08: Like we said in prepared remarks, legal expense was the primary driver of the $4 million incremental loss tax. I would stop short of trying to predict the future on that, John, and I might let Patricio comment as well because he's obviously been very close to all of it.
spk20: Yeah, so to Jim's point, in the last quarter there was a significant step up, primarily you know, preparations for the upcoming trial next week. We are not in a position to forecast the evolution of legal expenses. You know, frankly, they could keep stepping up, they could level off, or they could come down depending on a variety of scenarios. So, I think if you wanted to pick one among those three scenarios, Keeping it pretty much level would be probably the middle of the road alternative, but it could step up again because of additional actions we might take.
spk09: Understood. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. It comes from the line of Don McKenna of DB McKenna and Company. Please proceed.
spk13: Thank you. Patricio, the comments on future sales opportunities, again, are pretty positive. And with the exception of last quarter, the outlook has always been quite positive. And if you go back and read the transcripts, it's obvious that the potential markets that you envisioned and the superior products that you're offering today just haven't produced the results you would hope for. And I'm wondering what you've learned from that failure to capture the potential and what changes you've made in your approach to improve the sales and profitability.
spk20: So as suggested in my quotes, we believe we are executing well with a clear vision of what challenges and opportunities are. And frankly, I think there's a big part of the answer to your question that has to do with the vagaries of what has been going on with certain leading OEMs, where their priorities have taken them in terms of product development. And to keep it at the very high and general level, I would say that from our visibility, a unique perspective with respect to the evolution of our system requirements. Some of the choices that have been made with certain OEMs are going to get those OEMs into a real bind, both in terms of the performance of their platforms, and more importantly, their competitive standing relative to other companies that are aspiring to capture market share and they see the opportunity of leveraging a superior power system technology from Vigo. So I guess I'm not apologetic with respect to how we got to where we are. We don't control our destiny in every respect. Obviously, we make exceeding decisions with respect to strategy and how we're going to make the most of the opportunity, both in terms of FAB our 5G technology, and importantly, our intellectual property. And I would say that I'm quite satisfied with how we got to where we are, and I think we have tremendous opportunity. It takes perseverance, clarity of vision, persistence. We have all those traits, and we expect to, before too long, capitalize on the opportunity.
spk13: I realize it's very difficult for you to try to make any projections on the short term. Can you give us some kind of a feel for where you would expect revenues as a percentage increase over current, let's say, three years down the road? What would you be satisfied with?
spk20: I don't know that I can honestly give you numbers or general expectations without substantial risk in either direction. I think I can say that we do expect to fill our FAB. As we know, the FAB has got a billion dollars worth of capacity and maybe a little more than that. We're going to be able to fill that FAB with opportunities related to you know, 5G, in AI, in data center type of applications, as well as automotive applications, and generally speaking to Phil's earlier point, our top 100 customers in diversified several markets.
spk13: And would you expect to fill that tab in the next three years?
spk20: I do expect that that will happen. I don't know if Phil wants to add some color to this,
spk06: No, I would just say that that's the objective is to achieve that and to do it with the broad-based market, with our distribution channel on the broad-based level, but also the top 100 focus. And we're making great progress across the four BUs with the top 100. And the new products that we're introducing this year, not just the Gen 5, but new high-power front end, products are getting designed into these top 100 customers that we're now focused on. I'm confident that we'll fill the path. I think that some exciting times are ahead of us.
spk11: Great. Thanks, guys. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. It comes from the line of Alan Hicks with Ainsley Capital. Please proceed.
spk18: Good afternoon. I think I heard you say 48% on BBU and 50% on advanced products. Was that correct?
spk20: I'm sorry. Could you repeat that? I'm a little bit handicapped here with my audio today.
spk18: Okay. On the percentage of revenues, advanced products, I think, were a little over 50%, and BBU was a little over 48%. Was that correct?
spk20: That's correct. For the past quarter, yeah, the mix between advanced products and big products changed.
spk18: Okay. So could we assume that royalties were that other 2%?
spk02: I'm sorry, the royalties were?
spk18: The differential added up to 98% roughly. But the differential would be roughly 2%.
spk20: I wouldn't make that assumption. I don't know that I can give you a quantitative measure here. I know as part of our reporting, and maybe Jim can comment on that. He can point you to where you can find additional information.
spk08: Yeah. Alan, the better way to think about it is we said 51.6% advance, 48.4 BRIC, which is 100%. And, you know, the realty income is associated with advanced products.
spk18: Okay. Last quarter it was $7 million, I believe. Did it grow significantly from last quarter?
spk05: It did grow. It did grow and stepped up significantly. substantially from last quarter.
spk18: OK. And is the factory, are the gross margins also improving on the factory?
spk03: Sorry, go ahead, Patricio.
spk20: OK. Well, so needless to say, capacity recession in the factory is an issue, was an issue as of the last quarter, still going to be an issue this quarter. And the fact that the revenues, particularly car revenues, took a step down last quarter didn't help with respect to margins. But all the factors that Jim pointed to in his remarks, including beyond licensing income, reduction in tariffs, changing mix, federal mix, contributed to a significant improvement in total gross margins. And that's a trend line that we are satisfied with. I think we represent in the past that we have a goal to achieve substantially higher margins. And that goal is supported by the strategies that we're implementing and executing with the mix of further advances with respect to our product capabilities, as well as the complementary element of, in effect, monetizing some of the value or IP through selective licensing.
spk18: So I think those gross margins were easily the best you've ever had. Fifth Bank was 53.6%.
spk20: I think gross margins for the quarter, Jim, correct me if I'm wrong, but 53 and change, right?
spk08: Yeah, so I can comment on that, Alan, actually. So 53.8 was the result last quarter, and that was the highest for sure since I've been at FICOR.
spk18: I've got going back over 20 years, so that's the highest I've ever seen. Do you expect that to continue to grow the rest of the year based on royalty increases?
spk20: Again, we're not going to be making detailed quarterly predictions in a year in which so much could happen. So I think we're just going to have to, the ones among us that are invested in VIGO for the long term are going to look at this. I think one of the analysts asked a question in the last call about 2024 being, quote unquote, the transition year. I think at the time, I didn't embrace decarterization. I think in hindsight, it's probably the better way of looking at it. This is a year of transition in which, in effect, a lot of things are going to change, and I would expect for the better.
spk18: Okay. I was at the NVIDIA conference, I think it was February or last month, And I stopped by the Delta Brews, and I asked about the NBM product. And they showed it to me and said, we're not infringing because we have a different process. I don't know. That's all they said, and they kind of shut up. But can you comment on that?
spk20: Yeah, the leather B&S came to mind. The fact is that their copycat product infringes three of our patents. And thus far, the proceedings corroborated that expectation. So let's wait and see what happens with what I expect to be an exclusion order against them.
spk18: OK. And just a quick question on that. There was a product, I think it was showed at the WCX, that had DC-DC converter, 150,000 watts, I think. Is that for charging stations? Phil, could you answer that?
spk06: Yeah, that was the PSU, Patricio, the demo, the five paralleled MBMs in the PSU, the 150 kilowatt onboard 800 to 400 volt charger. That was on demo. Well, we had it in the case, not covered up at WCX.
spk17: But is the application for charging stations?
spk20: That's an application for fast charging and it's an application where we have a major weight advantage as well as a major efficiency advantage. So that system comprising at the moment five of our modules and in fact we'll be able to get to the 150 kilowatt capability with a reduced number of four. You know, that system sports a peak efficiency of over 99%, and it has, you know, astronomical power density, meaning its volume measured in liters and weight measured in kilograms is a small fraction of any competitive unit. So that would go both in the car and the charging station? No, this is a device that certain automakers are going to incorporate within the vehicle in order to facilitate flexible charging.
spk18: OK. How far away are you from design wins there?
spk20: We have design wins with two smaller automakers.
spk18: OK. And one last question. You say you're going to fill the factory to 1 billion in three years or whatever. So that's in addition to whatever OEMs are also manufacturing or licensing your products?
spk20: Phil, I'm having a hard time here with my audio. Could you respond to that?
spk06: Yes. So our goal is product revenues out of the factory, as Patricio said, just over a billion dollars out of that new fab. But we are licensing activities adding to that, yes.
spk18: Okay. Okay. Thank you very much.
spk25: Thank you. Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from the line of John Dillon with DMB Capital. Please proceed.
spk28: Hi, guys. Thanks a lot for taking my questions. I appreciate it. Bill, now that your factory is finished and we're seeing processors at 1,000 watts and higher coming to the market, and also in your prepared remarks, I think I heard you say target production dates for HPC, when will we start seeing evidence of GPUs from major manufacturers using the BiQuare POL solutions?
spk06: So I think Patricio talked about that, John. I think that, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, we're delivering electrical, mechanical, thermal models to leading customers right now. Then we'll follow that up at the end of Q2 with a demo system that they'll be able to check out hardware and test the models against the demo system. And then we'll be sampling towards the end of Q3 And we expect production probably towards the second half of 2025. That's when we'll have vertical power delivery in production.
spk29: Is that what you were referring to?
spk20: There's one notable customer, though, that may well be in production come the very beginning of next year. And for that customer, the hardware, is due to be delivered in the summer months.
spk28: Excellent. And Phil, is that the target production dates that you were talking about, or is that something different?
spk06: No, that's the target production dates, yeah.
spk28: Gotcha. And are there current Gen 4 designs in production or about to go in production that will act as a bridge to the Gen 5?
spk06: Yeah, we have some Gen 4 design wins, but again, as Patricio pointed out, there have been some market shifts with people changing strategies with supply chain considerations ahead of performance and technology, but vertical power delivery comes along. We have, with the Gen 5 technology, an incredible solution with the current density that we can get to 3x over what the competition will be. So I think there'll be some really hard reassessments being made as we move forward here with a number of accounts, but we'll see that happen. But we have some very good interest from the accounts that are building really big investments into AI and developing their own processor chips, and they're the people that you would expect, and we have great engagements with them right now. I'm confident Gen 5 is going to be all that it can be, and we're going to be having a very exciting 2025.
spk28: And you're pretty confident, then, that the productization schedule will stay on schedule?
spk06: I'm personally confident. Patricio, you want to comment on that? But I certainly am.
spk20: I'm also confident. I think... We're leveraging, for the most part, processes and equipment that we have installed and have fully vetted. There are a few process steps that are going to be used in order to scale up capacity, not to deliver initial units that are still under some level of refinement. But generally speaking, the capability is in place, and we have a fab with the capacity to build very, very large quantities of panels and see some solutions for customers.
spk28: So you guys have working alpha or beta product right now?
spk20: So we have a lead customer that we're going to be delivering functional systems. We started some initial partial delivery, but we're going to be delivering complete systems in late June, July timeframe. Excellent. So the lead application to be followed by others as we get into the other part of the year.
spk28: Excellent. I'll get back in the queue. Thank you very much.
spk20: Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham and Company. Please proceed.
spk14: Hey, Jim, just a question on the royalty, how it works. The royalty revenue you recognized in the first quarter, is that for shipments of your licensee that took place a quarter and a rear, so effectively shipments in the fourth calendar quarter of last year? or is it sort of for shipments that took place in one queue of 24?
spk04: It's real-time.
spk08: It's based on shipments that basically they take receipt of. But it's not in arrears. It's in the quarter.
spk14: Okay, perfect. And then just sort of following up on John's question around the Gen 5 deliveries, The lead customer for Gen 5, I assume that that's a data center or sort of AI or HPC application, but just wondering if you could give us in broad strokes what sort of the application is for that first Gen 5 customer.
spk20: It's within the confines you just defined, but at this point in time, We really don't want to be specific. We want to give this customer the full advantage of being first and having an elemental surprise. But it's within the general field that you identified. Got it. Got it. Okay. Thank you.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from the line of Richard Shannon of Craig Callum. Please proceed.
spk15: Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my follow-on question here. I guess, Phil, following on your prepared remarks here, which has probably had as much focus outside of HBC as we've heard in some time here, and you kind of alluded to this at your shareholders meeting last year as well, but in that context, give us a some sort of understanding of a split of your advanced product revenues between HPC and other applications. And then also, if you might just give us a flavor of how much of that advanced product segment is also point of load versus bridging and other kinds of functionality.
spk06: Phil? Yeah, so can you hear me?
spk23: Yeah.
spk06: Yeah, so today the advanced product revenues are...
spk08: Yeah, the advanced product revenue last quarter was 51.6%. Yeah, about 52% of the total company.
spk06: Yeah, and the bulk of that was, well, a number of it was into UPC. There's quite a bit of it's now going into industrial. And I think the early days in automotive, as everyone knows, early days in insurance, that's We're doing quite a few new electronic wall and fence and aerospace applications, you know, like the space satellite application that we've been talking about. We're getting more design wins there. So it's really spread amongst those three business units, excluding automotive, Richard.
spk20: Okay, that's helpful. I would add to that that, you know, the strategy that Phil outlined with data diversification among different end markets with different traits and different sets of opportunities, that's fully supported by a product strategy that leverages commonality of, you know, power conversion engines, control systems, packaging technology, So we are able to, in effect, address market needs in markets and markets that may appear to be somewhat distant, like test equipment on the one hand and, you know, high current point of load VP data applications. You know, with modules, in particular 5G type modules, they're essentially the same. And that sets us apart. in another way relative to the competition, so to speak.
spk15: Okay. Thanks for all that detail. And a quick follow-on question for Patricio. You talked about consistently from the time that we've covered you and, frankly, a lot longer about having a distinct advantage in terms of power delivery at very high currents. You talked about delivering samples or whatever to customers up to 2,000 amps. I wonder if you characterize the competitive dynamics here in the future with 5G in the terms of above what do you think you're going to be the only credible solution up there? Is that at 1,000 amps or below that or above that? Just any characterization so we can think about this as we see the next generation of accelerators come to market.
spk20: So we've enabled systems – They're already up to a few tens of thousands of amperes on a wafer. I would say that's the most advanced solution in terms of power system capability and, from what I can tell, compute capability in the market. obviously cutting edge and far above the more common denominator type of applications, which as Phil suggested earlier, are trending up to the 2000 app level. So we're involved in one important development with a major OEM at the 2000 app level. At that level, fundamentally, you need VPD, and you need an in-adapt form of VPD, such as what we call second-gen VPD. Yes, you could try to do it with the third-gen VPD that has been copied to a high degree by competitors, But what you'd be stuck with is a system, a power system that involves modules that are very heavy, very thick, thermally inept, difficult to cool, with very poor yields in assembly and reliability issues, not to mention the AP issues alluded to earlier. So we see the market in AI in particular, quickly getting past the thousand app level and fundamentally left with VPD only solutions. Lateral is out. Even lateral vertical while achieving significant benefits relative to lateral, not as good as vertical. And fundamentally what's going to be needed is a more advanced version of VPD that doesn't bring about the stacking challenges that characterize first-generation VPD as vigo-pioneered and palliative.
spk12: Okay, great.
spk19: Thank you, guys.
spk25: Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. All right, our last question comes from John Tan Wanting with CJS Securities. Please proceed.
spk10: Hi, thanks for taking one more from me. I was wondering if you could update us just on the uptake of automotive and when you expect to start shipping in volume those products. I think you've said for a number of years now that you expect a 25%
spk06: be the year that automotive really starts shipping and making a difference i'm wondering if that remains on track and if that's going to be a good source of growth uh even before your vpd products start shipping in the second half of 25. um hi john this is phil so so now the timing for automotive um is really uh 26 27 from you know reasonable revenue ramps uh beginning um There may be opportunities in Asia Pacific, conversations that we've had in the last six months that could pull that in, but those are yet to develop, so it's too early to talk about those yet. But this is really a 26, 27 story for automotive. Although we will begin, as I mentioned, I think last quarter or even in my remarks the quarter before, production, early production at the end of this year. for high-performance applications. So I think that that's sort of the timeframe that we're on with automotive.
spk10: Okay, got it. If you were to characterize what could be a bridge market between then and now, which one would be the most likely to drive some sort of upside, whether it be HPC or automotive or some of these other applications you're talking about?
spk06: Yeah, HPC is definitely number one. And I think that we are, again, as I mentioned, seeing very good design-ins and wins in industrial defense and aerospace. So there's going to be some really good growth at good margins coming from those markets. But HPC and Gen 5 could just completely dominate that.
spk10: Got it. Thank you, guys.
spk25: Thank you. I'm not showing any further questions in the queue. Thank you.
spk07: Okay, thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for joining.
spk25: And with that, everybody, we appreciate your participation, and you may now disconnect.
Disclaimer