Welltower Inc.

Q2 2021 Earnings Conference Call

7/30/2021

spk14: Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q2 2021 Welltower Inc. earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 1 on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. If you require any further assistance, please press star 0. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Mr. Matt McQueen, General Counsel. Please go ahead.
spk03: Thank you, and good morning. As a reminder, certain statements made during this call today may be deemed forward-looking statements in the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Although Welltower believes any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, the company can give no assurances that its projected results will be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are detailed in the company's filings of the SEC. And with that, I'll hand the call over to Sean for his remarks. Sean?
spk17: Thank you, Matt, and good morning, everyone. I hope that all of you and your families are safe and healthy. Before I make some introductory comments on the state of senior housing and on capital allocation environment, I want to welcome John Barker, our Chief Operating Officer, to this call. John joined World Tower last week after an illustrious 25-year career at Essex. We believe he will make a tremendous long-term impact on our platform. Following my remarks, as usual, Tim will walk you through our operating and financial results. We're cautiously optimistic on the senior housing business as occupancy is starting to build, and we're encouraged by nearly 200 basis points of spot-to-spot occupancy growth in second quarter, which clearly exceeded our expectations. Momentum in the U.S. continued to be strong, with lead generation returning to pre-COVID levels, resulting in a 280 basis points occupancy gain in the quarter, and the U.K. remained resilient despite a rise in the Delta variant cases being driven by the younger cohorts. Though we are monitoring the situation closely, we have seen very little impact to the portfolio so far, as U.K. case counts more broadly appear to be decreasing rapidly after a recent spike. While Canada was a drag on occupancy, we're witnessing some green shoots following a material decline in COVID cases. In fact, tours almost doubled in June from April and May in Canada as provinces have removed move-in restrictions and are now permitting in-person tours. For our overall portfolio, June was a particularly impressive month with move-ins exceeding 2019 level for the first time since the beginning of the pandemic. I'm also encouraged that our operators were able to achieve these occupancy gains while holding rates, reflecting the need-based nature of our asset class, and strong value proposition of this business. Year over year, same-store report is up 3.2% across our assisted living properties, 2.8% across our independent living properties, and 5.3% across our wellness housing communities. The strength in same-store effort was primarily driven by our high-end luxury product in primary coastal markets. Having said that, I'll caution you that there is still significant uncertainty and many unknowns related to the path of COVID, and it is too early to signal an all-clear. However, we're very pleased with the progress that we're making towards achieving the substantial embedded NOI growth in our show portfolio. Last quarter, we provided information details of nearly half a billion dollars of NOI upside, which assumes a return to fourth quarter 2019 occupancy and margin levels. We are pleased to report that we not only achieved $71 million towards this total goal in one quarter, but also added another $29 million of potential upside through the second quarter acquisition and development deliveries. Going forward, we'll still have another $430 million of NOI upside in that business. Again, this only assumes a return to pre-COVID occupancy with potential upside from higher rates and return to frictional vacancy, which is mid to high single digits. Turning to capital allocations. Last fall, when we made a significant pivot from defense to offense, we made an explicit bet that consumers will return to this need-driven business. With 400 basis points of occupancy ramp in U.S. from March trough, with healthy rates, it appears that we're on the right side of that bet. Over the past three quarters, we have deployed $4 billion of capital at extremely attractive pricing during a time when others were fearful. But we remain paranoid optimists, and our humility and lack of complacency are pushing us to test our hypothesis and underwrite everything we look at with conservatism. And you can rest assured that we look at pretty much everything in our space. Therefore, we are only willing to pay a price per unit that does not require everything to go right for our owners to make a reasonable return. The second quarter was one of the best quarters from a capital deployment perspective, having closed approximately $1.4 billion of growth investments. Q3 will likely top Q2, and we anticipate that it will be another record quarter of investment activity for the company. We started Q3 with a bang, and so far in July, we have already closed $230 million of gross investments and expect our previously disclosed holiday transaction to close in third quarter as well. While it is fun to talk about large transactions like holiday, which I'll get to in a minute, I want to point out that our core strategy and strength is granular transaction with a diverse group of operating partners and is supported by our data analytics platform. Our COVID class, which I define as anything we bought since starting to offense in Q4 of last year, now exceeds $4 billion of gross investment activity, including holiday, across 37 transactions with 24 unique partners. In the U.S., That would, on average, be $16.6 million per community or $161,000 per unit, which we believe represents a significant discount to replacement costs. The pipeline remains very strong, with many owners and operators eager to join our operator and data platform. Let me give you some examples. I'm very pleased to announce that we'll expand our relationship with John Moore and his team at Atria, while Lele and her team at Holiday will join our platform. We're buying 80 nearly identical Holiday independent living assets at more approachable end of senior living spectrum with an addition of six more combination ALIL assets for a total consideration of $1.58 billion, or $152,000 per unit. Our basis remains compelling even after our anticipated investments of $1.5 to $2 million of CapEx per community to bring them to tomorrow's standards. While the lease-up of this portfolio from the compelling basis should generate a double-digit unlevered IRR, we believe there are few opportunities to enhance our return. Number one, our underwritten rent growth is 2.5% per year despite a heavy investment in the portfolio that will improve the asset quality and marketability. Our 2026 underwritten rent remains $700 to $800 below feasibility rent to make development pencil. We have a significant expansion opportunity in 10-plus assets, which we expect will generate a double-digit return on invested capital. Three, the optimization of six AL buildings under ATRIA platform. And four, there are at least five higher and better use opportunities. And a couple of them are so significant that they may generate enough proceeds to pay for a significant portion of the CapEx investment for the whole portfolio. If we are successful in this effort, we'll have a completely renovated portfolio at roughly our going-in basis, which will enhance our IRR materially. Moving on from Holiday, I'd like to make a few operator-specific comments on this call. First, we continue to be encouraged by Jack Carlson's leadership at Sunrise. Jack is refocusing the organization as a premier senior living brand in North America. We are excited about this focused growth strategy and have brought Sunrise in to run a recently-acquired community in the Philadelphia metro area. This is our first acquisition initiative with Sunrise in several years and believe we'll have many opportunities to grow together. In the UK, Sunrise platform and portfolio will be acquired by Signature and Care UK. Signature is an existing World Tower operating partner which runs our highest-end communities in the UK. We're tremendously excited to welcome Care UK to our platform, which is one of the most well-respected and largest senior living operators in the U.K. With the addition of HC1 on the value end and Care UK on the higher end, along with our existing operating partners, the barbell approach to portfolio construction that we have taken in the U.S. and which we always aspired to be in the U.K. is beginning to take shape. We're very excited about CareUK's technology and management platform. We're also thrilled to welcome Pathway Living to Wellstar's operating platform, which we believe opens another avenue for growth for us. Next, I'm excited to announce our expanded partnership with Oakmont Management Group, which is one of our strongest and best operating partners. This expanded partnership with Courtney and her team is expected to result in a nearly doubling of our current portfolio together in California. We're also embarking on a long-term exclusive development program together to meaningfully expand our relationship in the next decade. Fun fact, Oakmont is our first operator in our portfolio to return to the 90% occupancy mark post-COVID, a reflection of Oakmont's operating acumen and market strength. Finally, I'm excited to announce our new partnership with Chris Smith and his team at Aspect Health. We recapped Aspect's existing MOB portfolio in Connecticut and New York and entered into a long-term development partnership with Chris. We believe a combination of our data and operating capabilities with Aspect's relationships and development talent will create significant opportunities for growth for both the companies. We are already on our first development together, which will be a 60,000 square feet outpatient medical building located at a very attractive market in the New York metropolitan area. The property will be master leased to a leading health system for 20 years and is expected to start construction early next year. Speaking of growth opportunities, I'm pleased to announce our continued growth with the Bremner organization. In the second quarter, our partnership closed on the first building of a large development near Norman, Oklahoma, with Norman Regional Health System. The total development cost for phase one of this multi-phase development is expected to be in excess of $100 million, consisting of 181,000 rentable square feet of Class A outpatient medical facilities. Our significant MOB development pipeline, which is 100% leased, is now in excess of 1 million square feet and will create significant value for our shareholders in a very tight acquisition market. All of these operating and development partnerships make us the foundation for our core belief that Their centralized capital allocation and decentralized execution releases entrepreneurial energy while keeping cost and politics at bay. We're very proud that we have formed 50 new operator and developer relationships since the beginning of pandemic, and we have a handful more in the works. The implication of our rapidly growing operator and developer platform are vast, including a network effect whereby addition of more operators create exponentially richer data sets and thus stronger and attractive analytics platform. This dramatically enhances the informational advantage where already processes through our best-in-class data analytics platform, which forms the basis of our capital allocation decision. Needless to say, these relationships create foundation for significant capital deployment opportunities as each one of them are attractive growth vehicles on their own right. This Lollapalooza effect of intertwining operating and data platform has created a wide and increasingly deeper moat for WorldTower. As Tim will speak to you in a moment, we're very pleased with our progress to further strengthen our balance sheet and liquidity profile. More specifically, our sequential adjusted EBITDA growth of roughly $50 million indicates that we're on our way to deleverage organically as senior housing recovery unfolds. Overall, we're very happy with our execution so far in the year to create car share value for our shareholders. We're cautiously optimistic about the fundamental environment and excited about our opportunity set to acquire and develop talent, create new relationships, and attract quality partners, which should result outsized internal and external growth for years to come. After retooling our asset and portfolio operator, and building a formidable predictive analytics platform and talent base and growing with conviction following two negative cycles superimposed on each other resulting from oversupply and COVID, I'm happy to say that we're emerging as a partner of choice, an employer of choice, and an investor of choice on the other side of this pandemic. With that, I'll pass it over to Tim. Tim?
spk16: Thank you, Sean. My comments today will focus on our second quarter 2021 results, the performance of our investment segments in the quarter, our capital activity, and finally, a balance sheet and liquidity update in addition to our outlook for the third quarter. At the time of our last earnings call on April 29th, we were six weeks into an occupancy recovery in our senior housing operating portfolio, which had seen total portfolio occupancy increase 67 basis points off March 12th lows, or an average increase of 11 basis points per week. In the 13 weeks that have followed, we have seen the occupancy recovery accelerate, adding an additional 204 basis points through July 23, an average pace of 16 basis points per week, bringing the portfolio-wide occupancy recovery since March 12 to 271 basis points. The recovery continues to be uneven across the portfolio, with the U.S. leading at 401 basis points since March 12, followed by the U.K. at 275 basis points, And lastly, Canada, which has seen a net decrease of 88 basis points over this time period. We believe these geographic discrepancies will normalize over time as the reopening of both Canada and the U.K. catch up to the U.S. Looking forward, despite the uncertainty around the path of COVID in the near term, particularly the spread of the new variants, we continue to both gain evidence that the vaccines are exceptionally effective at protecting our residents and staff from this evolving virus, and gain confidence that the permanent demand impairment thesis that surrounded the senior housing asset class through much of the last year and a half is becoming significantly less probable. Now turning to the quarter. Welltower reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $0.06 per diluted share and normalized FFO of $0.79 per diluted share versus initial guidance of $0.72 to $0.77 per share. and our June guidance update of $0.75 to $0.79 per share, which included a $5 million benefit from HHS provider relief funds. We ultimately recognized that $5 million benefit from HHS funds and also recognized an additional $4.9 million of reimbursement payments for similar programs in Canada and the UK. After adjusting for the impact of these funds, our normalized FFO per diluted share in the quarter is $0.77. Now turning to our individual portfolio components. First, our triple net lease portfolios. As a reminder, our triple net lease portfolio coverage and occupancy stats are reported a quarter in arrears. These statistics reflect the trailing 12 months ending 3-31-2021. Importantly, our collection rate remained high in the second quarter, having collected 95% of triple net contractual rent during the period. In our senior housing triple net portfolio, same store in Hawaii declined 2.7% year-over-year. as leases that were moved to cash recognition in prior quarters continued to comp against prior year full contractual rent received. And trailing 12-month EBITDA coverage was 0.89 times. As I've stated in the past, the timing and slope of the recovery in our senior housing portfolio will dictate whether or not disruption from COVID to underlying fundamentals generates a short-term liquidity issue or a solvency problem for our triple net operators. Over the first four months of recovery, We observed occupancy and EBITDA trends within this portfolio that are in line with our U.S. and U.K. operating portfolios. As these recovery trends strengthen, the solvency risk for our operators has decreased in tandem, and our continued strong cash rent collection in the quarter is the best evidence we have of this. The value of the collateral that sits behind many of our lease agreements continue to allow us to work with our operators to enhance near-term liquidity without impairing the value of Welltower's real estate position. Next. Our long-term post-acute portfolio generated negative 1.1% year-over-year same-store growth, and trailing 12-month EBITDA coverage was 1.29 times. In the quarter, we transitioned 40 of the 51 planned Genesis transition assets to new operators, including nine power-back assets transitioned to ProMedica, with the remaining 11 scheduled to transition in the third quarter. Thirty-five of these assets are expected to be disposed of in the third quarter. With the expected third quarter Genesis dispositions and the $75 million sale of an LTAC portfolio in the quarter, Welltower's percentage of in-place NOI generated from long-term post-acute segment will be reduced to 5.6%, and Genesis Healthcare will represent less than 90 basis points of total company in-place NOI. Lastly, health systems, which is comprised of our ProMedica Senior Care Joint Venture with the ProMedica Health System, had same-store NOI growth of positive 2.7% year-over-year. and trailing 12-month EBITDA coverage was 1.25 times. Turning to medical office, our outpatient medical segment delivered 2.2% year-over-year same-store growth due to improved platform profitability and increased property-level expense recoveries. Occupancy in our same-store portfolio ended the quarter at 94.8%, a 20 basis point sequential increase versus first quarter. This strong growth was driven by executed new leasing totaling 178,000 square feet, our highest quarter since the fourth quarter of 2019, and supported by 94% retention in the quarter, as consistent renewal activity was paired with reduced vacancies. Also during the quarter, we delivered one purpose-built medical office building with the Monty's Medical Center in Brooklyn, along with two recently converted state-of-the-art MOBs in Charlotte with Atrium Health. These buildings total 449,000 square feet of fully occupied space with highly credited health systems. Now turning to our senior housing operating portfolio. Before getting into this quarter's results, I want to provide some color on the recently announced transfer of the Sunrise UK operating platform to two local operators, Signature Senior Lifestyle and Care UK. We're excited to take this opportunity to deepen our local operator relationships. The Sunrise UK portfolio consists of 46 predominantly private-paid properties located primarily in southern England. The portfolio is being split largely by geographic focus, The property is located in Greater London, moving to Signature, a premium operator with which Welltower has had a relationship since 2012. And the rest of the property is moving to Care UK, a new member of the Welltower operating family and the fourth largest independent care home operator in the UK with a focus on the private pay market. Turning to government grants. In the quarter, we received approximately $5 million from the Department of Health and Human Services CARES Act Provider Relief Fund. As we've done in past quarters, These funds are recognized on a cash basis and, as such, will flow through financials the quarter they are received. We are normalizing HHS funds out of our same-store metrics, however, along with any other government funds received that are not matched to expenses incurred in the period they are received. In the second quarter, there were approximately $9.3 million of reimbursements normalized out of our same-store senior housing operating results. Now turning to results of the quarter. Year-over-year same-store NOI decreased 17.6% as compared to 2Q2020. driven by a 670 basis point decrease in year-over-year average occupancy. The COVID-related decline in occupancy that began in March of 2020 came to a halt in mid-March of this year, and portfolio-wide occupancy increased by approximately 230 basis points from March 12th to the end of June, with 190 basis points taking place in the second quarter. The start of the occupancy recovery and the accompanying operating margin expansion has created an inflection point for bottom-line results. the sequential same-store NOI increased 11.2% from the first to the second quarter. Sequential same-store revenue was up 1.8% in Q2, driven primarily by a 40 basis point increase in average occupancy and sequential monthly rev pour increase of 1.3%. With respect to expenses, total same-store expenses decreased 40 basis points sequentially and declined 2.9% year-over-year. I will focus on the sequential change since this is more relevant to trends in the current operating environment. The 40 basis point sequential decline in operating costs was driven mainly by lower COVID costs as case counts remained near zero for all the second quarter after spiking meaningfully in the first quarter. Costs were also driven lower sequentially by seasonal utility costs as the spring and early summer have lower utility costs relative to Q1. The net results of the resilient rental rates and rebounding occupancy combined with a decrease in total expenses, was a sequential margin improvement in our same-store pool of 180 basis points to 21.2%. Looking forward to the third quarter, and starting with July quarter-to-date data we have already observed, we've experienced a 40 basis point increase in occupancy through July 23rd, with the U.S. and the U.K. up 60 and 30 basis points respectively, while Canada is flat. Despite the strength of the recovery so far, particularly in the U.S., we remain cautious in projecting an acceleration in trends from the second quarter to the third quarter, given the continued lack of historical precedence with which to forecast, and also uncertainty around COVID variants. Despite seeing promising resilience in our UK portfolio over the last month, as the surge in the Delta variant infections amongst the general population has not been echoed amongst our resident population, there remains uncertainty, particularly around how national and local authorities may react in the coming months, if the surge continues or accelerates in our other geographies. On a spot basis, we are currently projecting an approximate 190 basis point increase in occupancy from June 30th through September 30th. We expect monthly REV4 to be up 1 to 1.5% sequentially and up 2.5% year-over-year. Lastly, we expect total expenses to be up 1.5 to 2% sequentially, driven by a combination of occupancy-driven labor utilization and seasonal utility costs, offset slightly by continued declines in COVID costs. The net result of these sequential changes will be expected flow-through margins in the mid-60s, inclusive of the seasonal utility increase, and mid-70s, normalizing for the seasonality of utility costs. Turning to capital market activity. In June, we expanded our existing unsecured credit facility to $4.7 billion after closing on a $4 billion unsecured revolving line of credit, which replaced our previous $3 billion revolver. The revolving facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 77.5 basis points, representing a five basis point improvement from pricing under a previous revolver. The facility was supported by 31 incumbent and new banks and highlights the incredible support of our banking partners. On June 28th, we completed the issuance of $500 million for senior unsecured notes due January 2029, bearing interest at 2.05%. Proceeds from the offering were used to pay down borrowings in our revolving line of credit, and to pay down the remaining balance of our COVID term loan put in place in April of 2020. Additionally, in the quarter, we extinguished $674 million of senior unsecured notes due 2023 using proceeds from our March 25, 2021 bond issuance, improving our weighted average maturity across senior unsecured notes to 8.2 years. We continue to enhance our balance sheet strength and position the company to efficiently capitalize a robust and highly visible pipeline of capital deployment opportunities. by utilizing our ATM program to fund those near-term transactions. Having sold 20.1 million shares since the beginning of the second quarter via forward sale agreement and the initial weighted average price of approximately $80 per share for expected gross proceeds of 1.6 billion. Since the beginning of the year, we've sold a total of 22.3 million shares of common stock via forward sale agreements, which are expected to generate a total of 1.8 billion in proceeds, of which 5 million shares were settled during the second quarter resulting in $372 million of gross proceeds. As capital deployment opportunities continue to materialize, we will look to fund those opportunities while maintaining ample liquidity and balance sheet flexibility. We ended the second quarter 6.8 times net debt to adjusted EBITDA, 6.88 times when adjusting out $5 million of HHS funds received the quarter. This HHS-adjusted 2Q21 leverage number represents a 0.25 times decline from the prior quarter's 7.13% debt to EBITDA adjusted for HHS. Last quarter, I highlighted the impact that the recovery in senior housing fundamentals would have on underlying EBITDA and cash flow-based leverage metrics. We are encouraged to see this trend take shape as a 15% sequential improvement in EBITDA contribution from senior housing operating grilled the entirety of the HHS adjusted improvement in debt to EBITDA. With total portfolio occupancy sitting at 74.6% at quarter end, 12.6% below pre-COVID levels, and approximately 16.6% below peak levels achieved prior to last decade's supply wave, we believe the stage is set for powerful EBITDA recovery. This occupancy upside is coupled with margin expansion off a very depressed base. Lastly, moving to our third quarter outlook. Last night, we provided an outlook for the third quarter of net income attributable to common stockholders per diluted share of 44 to 49 cents, and normalized FFO per diluted share of of 78 to 83 cents. This guidance has not taken into consideration any further HHS funds or similar government programs in the U.K. and Canada. So in comparing it sequentially to our second quarter normalized FFO per share, it would be better to use the as-adjusted 77 cents per share number I mentioned earlier in my comments, which excludes the out-of-period benefits of those programs as well. On this comparison, the midpoint of our third quarter guidance 80.5 cents per share represents a 3.5 cent sequential increase from 2Q. This 3.5 cents increase is comprised of a 3 cent per share increase from our senior housing operating portfolio, driven by an increase in sequential average occupancy and expected reduction in COVID costs. A 2 cent per share increase from strong net investment activity, highlighted by the expected closing of the holiday senior living portfolio during the third quarter. which is offsetting dilution from dispositions related to our previously communicated reduction exposure to Genesis. And a half-penny increase in NOI from recently converted developments, mainly two fully leased MOBs in Charlotte, North Carolina, and Brooklyn. These increases are offset by a one cent per share increase in sequential G&A, driven mainly by new hires, and a one cent dilution from shares settled in the second quarter. And with that, I will turn the call back over to Sean. Thank you, Tim.
spk17: Thank you, Tim. I want to conclude by expanding on a theme that I mentioned before. We're engaged in two small transactions with two other REITs in our sector that are not material to any company that's involved. We're buying a handful of assets in one transaction and selling a handful of assets in other transactions. The dollars involved are too small to even be mentioned on this call, but I bring them up as I think they reflect a new era of collaboration amongst public REITs. Both of these transactions will result in favorable outcomes for all of our respective shareholders on a transactional basis. But what's important to focus is an emerging theme amongst public REITs, that life doesn't have to be a zero-sum game. With that, the operator will open it up for questions.
spk14: Thank you, sir. As a reminder, to ask a question, you would need to press star 1 on your telephone. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. We ask that you please limit yourselves to one question and recue for follow-ups. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. I assure our first question comes from the line of Vikram Malhotra from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
spk18: Thanks so much, and good morning, everyone. I guess, you know, Shank and Tim, the one thing that sort of surprised me was the REF4 growth that you saw on a like-for-like basis. I think most people would have anticipated in this period of still occupancy recovering and low occupancy, there'll be more discounting. So I guess just on the expense side, two questions. One, did this surprise you and what drove that? And second, if this REF4 continues into kind of the next few quarters, what does that say about sort of the margin and the cash flow recovery into 22. Thanks.
spk17: I'll try to take a stab at that. So did it surprise us? Yes, it did. If you think about last quarter call, I said, you know, despite all the noise of discounting and others, and I said that our operators have a very special product and a very special value proposition that just they're not willing to discount. But having said that, I didn't expect this kind of pricing strength yet. You know, it was entirely driven by our high-standard luxury product in coastal markets, as I said. Do we expect it to continue? Yes, we do. In fact, as Tim pointed out in his prepared remarks, we expect that to accelerate into Q3. And so, look, I mean, from the perspective of, you know, the state is set for a very powerful recovery of margins and cash flow increase as we come through. But we're very, very excited about what's going on. And at the same time, there's a lot of uncertainty. We're not in this for next quarter, next month. This is a long-term business. We're excited about what we're seeing. But most importantly, as Tim pointed out, we think that we're increasingly getting to a point that is really validating our belief that that the business, which frankly it was when we said this last year around this time, that it's validating our belief that the product is needed and the consumers will be back, and we're seeing that.
spk14: Thank you. I show our next question. It comes from the line of Amanda Schweitzer from Baird. Please go ahead.
spk00: Thanks. Good morning. I wanted to start with a quick clarification on your occupancy guidance. When I think about your spot occupancy guidance versus where average occupancy will end up for the quarter, it looks like it might be a different setup from recent quarters, and average occupancy could actually end up exceeding spot occupancy in the third quarter. Is that the right way to think about it?
spk16: That's correct, Amanda. The right way to think about it is you think about 1Q to 2Q, and the first quarter, because of the decline in occupancy we saw that lasted for two and a half months of the quarter, We actually finished where spot occupancy was below average occupancy in 1Q. We have the opposite effect in 2Q, where the increase, particularly in June, has driven spot occupancy above average for second quarter. So thinking about our spot occupancy guidance, 190 basis points on kind of a spot-to-spot basis equates to 210 basis points on an average change from 2Q to 3Q. Thank you.
spk14: Our next question comes from the line of Joshua Dinaline from Bank of America. Please go ahead.
spk20: Yeah, morning, everyone. Just kind of curious to hear about your MLB pipeline and then just Aspect Health. Is there other sharpshooters out there you would be interested in working with?
spk17: Josh, thank you for the question. Our MLB pipeline, if you are asking about acquisition, that pipeline is zero. And if you're asking about development pipeline, it's actually a million plus square feet fully leased, 100% leased pipeline. We continue to believe that the pricing that we're seeing in the MLB market doesn't make any sense from a long-term IRR perspective. So we remain out of the market. We did this transaction specifically because we see a very significant growth opportunity with Chris and his team. And are we willing to partner with more local sharpshooters? Absolutely, yes. But purely on a transactional basis, we have not a lot of interest in that space right now. We think what we are seeing, the opportunity to deploy capital and make significant amount of return for our shareholders in the senior housing space is compelling, and that's where the capital deployment opportunities in the near term will be focused on.
spk14: Thank you. I'll show our next question. It comes from the line of Steve Sackwar from Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.
spk15: Yeah, thanks. Good morning. Shank, I was just wondering if you could talk about what your operator policies are with respect to vaccinations. You know, there's been a lot written about healthcare workers, some not wanting to get it. And I just wonder, does this create any kind of hangup in terms of move-ins or when you're marketing So, you know, maybe just kind of provide around the horn or kind of broad update on kind of where your operators stand and whether you've seen any issues.
spk16: Yeah, Steve, it certainly differs across operators. I'd say as far as the question around hang up on move-ins, the effectiveness of the vaccine and the lack of cases we've seen in the buildings across all three of our geographies at this point has really trumped the marketing around the operator policies. That being said, a large majority of the employees at the property level are vaccinated, along with upper 90% of our residents. So it's a highly vaccinated kind of facility environment across the board.
spk14: Thank you. I show our next question. It comes from the line of Michael Carroll from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk01: Yeah, thanks. I wanted to go back to the REV4 growth. I know that your operators have done a good job driving modest growth even at these occupancy levels. I mean, how does this dynamic change when occupancy gets back to the high 80% range? I guess I'm trying to understand how much does this rate growth vary? I mean, are changes generally more muted both on the downside or upside, or can we expect the total portfolio to generate significantly stronger REV4 growth once occupancy comes back to stabilization?
spk17: Mike, that's a very, very good question. Now you're asking me to speculate. So I will speculate, but it's a speculation nonetheless. But if you think about the occupancy as we get back sort of to the more stabilized occupancy level, you just call it high 80%. I think you will see significant pricing power even above what you have seen, you know, sort of this quarter, this particular quarter. Let me remind you, through the supply cycle, sort of call it from 15 to 19, when our occupancy has gone down, we have still raised rates above 4%, right? In the face of a supply cycle, which I expect, you know, the setup is completely different this, you know, this cycle, this decade forward, right? where you have better demand and probably in a better environment for supply as well. So should we see, once stabilization happens, greater pricing power? We absolutely should, but it remains to be seen. As I will tell you, one of the things that we interestingly watch is the very tight correlation of housing price appreciation and pricing power in the senior housing industry. And, you know, we have seen significant increase, you know, record household, you know, sort of wealth growth, and that hasn't really translated so far into senior housing pricing. We're probably starting to see some of that this quarter, but it will come through. Thank you.
spk14: Thank you. I'm sure our next question comes from the line of Rich Anderson from SMBC. Please go ahead.
spk04: Thanks. Good morning. So... When you take into account the embedded NOI that you go through in the deck and you hold everything else constant, you're kind of 50% shop and 20% senior housing adjusted for all of that. I know that's not absolutely precision, but you're clearly focused on the senior housing business. And I know your thesis has always been your IRR investors, and you think more about that than certain asset classes. But You are the senior housing REIT relative to your peers, like it or not, at least for now. I'm curious, as you're underwriting deals and kind of tethering yourself to the business, what are you thinking about in terms of the next supply cycle? We've seen that to be the risk for this business in the past. Lumber prices are coming back down. I'm wondering how you're underwriting the future for supply and how you're making sense of the growth in this side of the business.
spk17: Thank you, Rich. That's a very, very good question. So we continue to believe, as I said before, that you will see some supply, but you will not see this cycle. We believe that supply will chase demand instead of demand chasing supply like you have seen last decade. You know, if we see no supply, we have bigger issues, right, that says that we're the only people who actually see the business and everybody else missing. That's not how it is going to happen. But I wouldn't react to, you know, short-term, high-frequency data on these things because these data is obviously dangerous. comes with a lot of errors and noises, the similar types of data that you have in supply would have told you that occupancy for us for the quarter would be down with negative pricing. That clearly didn't happen. So I wouldn't react too much to this high-frequency data from one or two providers. I will tell you that forget about what others are doing. We are looking at a lot of development, and they're very, very hard to pencil. They're very hard to pencil given feasibility rent remains between 20% and 30% below, depending on different markets. And that's just, you know, that's just a question of how much rents have, you know, sort of cost has gone down, cost has gone up. And, you know, a high-frequency indicator like lumber price on your Bloomberg screen doesn't tell you that it has changed significantly. You've got to look at a long-term average and people's ownership of that that's sitting in the warehouse that it hasn't shown up yet. Will it show up? Probably it will show up at some point, but that's it. At the same time, you're seeing a lot of other product cost is going up. The country is significantly undersupplied on overall housing, and you will see housing stocks will continue to go up with the demand of the different materials. So I think a lot of lessons have been learned on the bank side, losing a lot of money in this space. A lot of equity has lost a lot of money. Clearly, you can see where we're buying product, new products. at significantly below replacement cost. And the gap between where we're buying, call it 60 cents on the dollar, and 100 cents is somebody lost a lot of money, right? And so it was obviously these lessons will be remembered in the near term as the demographic catch-on. But we are very much aware of what you are saying. This is why we're so focused on price per unit, and that's why I made the point I made during my prepared remarks that we're not willing to buy anything and everything, even if we think it's a decent deal. Because in many cases, a lot of these things, as a long-time investor in the space, a lot of these things need to go right over a period of time for us, our shareholders, to make money, and that's not that kind of investment I do make.
spk14: Thank you. I'm sure our next question comes from the line of Jonathan Hughes from Raymond James. Please go ahead.
spk19: Hey, good morning. I do agree with Rich. You are the seniors housing group, but I want to ask about the health system portfolio and what happened to EBITDA coverage there. I see it's one and a quarter turns now from 1.9 last quarter. And then could you also maybe talk about exposure to operators at less than one times EBITDA coverage? You know, without naming names, are there any ongoing discussions with operators for either rent deferrals or transitions across your triple net segments. Thank you.
spk17: Thank you, Jonathan. So first is the coverage came down for obvious reasons, right? You are still – remember, the NOI has troughed last quarter. It's still coming down, right, from a trailing – Four-quarter basis is how you report coverages, which means the better quarters are getting out of numbers and worse quarters are getting in the numbers. Mostly speaking, in a normalized, you know, in a stabilized environment, coverage should give you the state of the business. At inflection points like this where you've got sharp decrease and sharp increases, it will not give you the state of the business. Just, you know, like our other operators that you're seeing in shop part of the portfolio, The fundamentals have dropped last quarter, and it's actually getting better. So, for example, let's just talk about Prometica. I don't want to get into this because, frankly speaking, for our investors, Prometica coverage is an irrelevant metric because, as I told you before, that ProMedica rent is guaranteed by the health system, the mothership at the top end, right? So it really is a relevant metric for our investors. However, having said that, let me make some observations about that topic. The revenue, if you think about, for the second quarter, was the highest in actually for ProMedica. For that specific business, for manicure, was the highest in the last five quarters. They have seen significant increase, sequential increase in occupancy just this quarter, about 400 basis points in that skill nursing business. And, you know, what is going on is they are in middle of, as we in Promenica are in middle of, selling a bunch of assets, right, and those asset base, is going through, it has a negative EBITDA, as I talked about before when we announced the deal, and that's still flowing through the number and creating significant noise on the number side. So that is absolutely, it's sort of going to create a lot of issues. And also on the same side, you are seeing we added nine power back buildings that is getting integrated. So we have a lot of noise. I will tell you, let's take a step back and think about where the business is trending. Business, as I said, their second quarter revenue was the highest actually in the last five quarters. Business is getting better. ProMedica team, senior care team, is doing exactly what we laid it out that it will happen, which is creating new partnership with different systems. They announced a new partnership with MetroHealth in Cleveland. There's another one. They signed a joint venture, which I'm not the liberty of naming names right at this point. It's a premier system across the country. business is moving forward. But as far as, you know, wealth of shareholders are concerned, that rent is guaranteed by the mothership, which obviously is a very significant system with two plus billion dollars of cash and material, you know, $7 billion of revenue. So I don't want to get into that conversation. Remember at this point in juncture, just not just talking about Prometica, but any triple net leases will not reflect the state of the business because of the four quarter trailing nature of of how we report coverages. From the standpoint of your second question, I think Tim touched on it. I will still say again, we have told you before that we believe that our leases are backed by material amount of credit and assets that we own in joint venture and other assets owned by the operators. We do not believe there will be significant disruption of earnings and cash flow coming out of that. And our belief, that statement, is getting stronger and stronger every day. That's how much I'm willing to talk about any specific operator at this call. Thank you.
spk14: Thank you. I show our next question comes from the line of Mike Mueller from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.
spk02: Oh, hi. My question was just answered. Thanks.
spk14: Thank you, sir. I show our next question comes from the line of Juan Sanabria from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk13: Hi, thanks for the time. Just curious on the acquisition pipeline. You guys have done a tremendous amount of work and heavy lifting and kudos to you, but the market's always about what comes next. So just curious on your views of what's in the pipeline going forward and how long you think you can take advantage of this COVID dislocation. And for the deals that you're striking now, how should we think about when those were negotiated? I'm not sure if You could talk to Holiday or more broadly about when those deals were really struck versus just to think about the runway for future discounts and replacement cost opportunities.
spk17: Thank you, Juan. I completely agree with you. It's about what comes next. That's the point I was trying to make on the coverage metrics, right? It's the state of what's happening now and what's happening next, not what happened yesterday. Having said that, I'll tell you, it's important to understand when we talk about acquisitions, unlike many companies, we don't talk about what's under contract unless it is a very large transaction that shareholders should know about. Holiday is a very good example. So the $4 billion or so of COVID costs is transactions that we have closed. We could have given you a significantly higher number of the transactions we have shaken our hands on. So pipeline, I know you understand that, but I wanted to make a very concerted effort to make that point again, because it's very different from how most other companies report their numbers. So the pipeline, let's just talk about pipeline, which is where we have shaken hands, we have agreed on a transaction, and it's just going through the process. Real estate transactions take a long time to close, as you know. We're pretty quick. We're quicker than probably most other organizations that you'll meet, but we're also extremely thorough, right? So it takes time. We visit every property that we buy, so it takes time. So let's just talk about that pipeline, which we define as something that's under contract, that's visible, that is significant, and it's under contract. So we feel very, very good about continued momentum on the acquisition side. Let's talk about the shadow pipeline. which I define as something that we are negotiating right now that is also significant and visible. And I think you will see continued acquisitions at very, very favorable price. As I've said before, going forward, as I've said before, we're driven by value of acquisition, not volume of it, right? So as long as we can create value, we'll continue to occur. And if we see that market prices have moved to a place where it doesn't make sense, we will not. And, you know, it could be a lift service, but you can look at our history, and you will see that we have exactly done that. We have moved with market pricing, and if market pricing hasn't gotten to a place where we think it doesn't make sense, we sold assets. You know, near term, we see tremendous amount of opportunities by all this disruption in the market, and we're seeing tremendous opportunity because there are several operators and developers want to join our platform to access the data that we talked about for several quarters on this call. So sum it all together, you know, I'm very, very optimistic about capital deployment opportunities at very attractive price in coming quarters.
spk14: Thank you. I show our next question comes from the line of Nick Joseph from Citi. Please go ahead.
spk10: Thanks. Are you seeing any of your operators take additional preemptive measures for the Delta variant? And then are you seeing any recent changes to state or local restrictions?
spk16: Thanks, Nick. Good question. We have not seen significant changes to state and local restrictions. And my comments in the manuscript are more towards kind of the uncertainty around that going forward. There's obviously... a lot of noise around kind of where things may change from where they've been the most recent months. On the operator front, you know, our operators never, you think about something like a mask mandate, our operators never left the mask mandate. So you think about just the general facility and the way that they've been being run, there has not been, you know, likely will not be much of a change, depending on, obviously, the path of the virus, but to kind of what's going on in the general public the last few months, because the operators continue to run a very safe, stringent environment when it comes to COVID.
spk14: Thank you. I'm sure our next question comes from the line of Jordan Sadler from KeyBank Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk11: Thanks, and good morning, guys. So, Shank, I want to come back to, you know, your comment on moving swiftly. I know it's early and the pandemic's not over, but your bet on seniors housing seems to be playing out better than expected with occupancy improvements accelerating and now REVPAR growth coming through. How is this impacting your underwriting of new investments? And even on the asset management side of the portfolio, how is it impacting your thinking?
spk17: Thank you, Jordan. Look, I mean, when we made last year this bet, you know, for example, I'll tell you this is exactly a year, one year mark when we first have started this discussion with Oakmont how to grow this business significantly as a partnership. You know, yesterday marked exactly one year. The times were scary, right? I mean, there's no question about it. Occupancy was falling significantly. Like Iraq, Ibadan obviously was going down materially given the high operating leverage in the business. But we had unwavering belief that the product is needed and the consumers will return, right? That doesn't mean that we knew for sure that will happen. That's the bet we made, and that actually made sense on a risk-adjusted basis. And we talked about that over the last four calls. And I am very pleased, as you recognized, that that bet seems to be, you know, playing out. So how is it changing? Look, at the end of the day, you have to think about real estate as a game of basis, right? No matter how good the environment is or how bad the environment is, there's a floor and ceiling of value depending on what it costs to build. So we are not going out to say, you know, it's all clear. Things are fantastic. Let's just, you know, pay prices that are above replacement cost and acquire as much assets because we can, because we have a cost of capital. That is not how we run this place. We have a cost of capital. Our owners have given us a cost of capital. Our bondholders have given us a cost of capital so that we can accrue value to our owners, not because we want to accrue value to the sellers. And that is how we have always run this place, and that is how we'll always run this place. There is no doubt of opportunity. We're not significantly changing our underwriting. And frankly speaking, we're a basis investor, an IRR investor. So you might say, okay, your long-term 10-year IRR or 15-year IRR really hasn't changed. Has your near-term growth rates have changed? Yes, it has. but that doesn't translate into higher prices because we're still solving for the same IRR and we're still really focused on what the price per unit, price per foot is. Hopefully that helps you to get a glimpse of how we underwrite.
spk14: Thank you. I show our next question comes from the line of Nick Ulico from Scotiabank. Please go ahead.
spk08: Thanks. Just going back to the senior housing guidance for the third quarter, Tim, I know you talked about this earlier, that it's a little bit hard to predict an acceleration. But I guess I'm wondering, you know, how much did the July numbers sort of impact guidance, right? Because I think you said you're up 40 basis points so far in July as of last week. And I guess I'm just wondering, is that sort of running a little bit slower than before? June, at the end of the day, June was a very strong month. So I guess we're just trying to figure out kind of the sequential movement on occupancy here, which was strong in June, and then July feels like it's slowed down a little bit. Maybe you're putting in some conservatism about Delta variant, et cetera. Maybe just you can unpack that a little bit.
spk16: Thanks, Nick. That's a great question. And thinking about that relative to, you know, you look at the second quarter, as you pointed out, June was a very strong month. What we've seen coming into July is actually very consistent on indicators like leads and interest and all of the kind of leading indicators that were strong in June have continued in July. The biggest difference, you know, at this point, if we look at it, July 4th holiday was a very low move-in week, which is not surprising to us. Looking at June, so up 40, we're a bit more than 40 relative, or sorry, in July, we're a bit more than 40 month-to-date. At this point in July, we were mid-50s, so we're 10-plus basis points behind kind of where we were in June, and we're 10 to 15 basis points ahead where we were in April and May. So we're continuing to see this improvement on a trended basis. We're trying not to read too much into kind of the micro-trends, so I don't think July's start really plays a role in our conservatism. I think you mentioned at the end uncertainty around Delta variant and, as I said in my script, inability to necessarily forecast, given still unprecedented nature of the backdrop, derive a little bit of our view and how we give the guidance there, but it doesn't have as much to do with the start in July.
spk14: Thank you. I show our next question comes from the line of Lucas Hartwich from Green Street. Please go ahead.
spk02: Thanks. I have a question for John. I know you just joined the company, but I'm curious what your key priorities are out of the gate. Thank you.
spk06: It's day 10, so my key priority is the seek first to understand aspect of things. Very excited to be here, but those who know me know I don't give out my playbook, so I'm definitely not doing that, but very excited to see a lot of opportunity, amazing people here. Sean is obviously amazing, and that's as much as I'm going to give you today.
spk14: Thank you. I show next question comes from the line of Derek Johnson from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
spk09: Good morning, everyone. Back to the capital deployment front. Are you changing or getting creative with the mix? Specifically in show? How are you viewing independent living versus assisted living opportunities? And how do the valuations vary in the private markets for each segment? versus replacement costs today and, of course, Wells' appetite for each?
spk17: We are actually not changing the criteria. It is usually the replacement cost of assisted living for a like-for-like location is higher, sometimes significantly higher. But we always invest capital relative to what the replacement cost is. Our targets are not different. I will tell you that we have a general propensity to go with a micro market with a strong operator who have a strong hold on a product type. Going forward, as you think about, I said this before, our portfolio has a barbell approach. We want to be at a high price point, high service areas, high service products in great barriers to high barriers to entry markets. or we want to be on the lower sort of approachable end of lower price point, low service, right? That's kind of what our bar bill approach is, and we have not changed that. So there is a lot of creativity in the shop, but usually that's not around just a product selection. That's around where you want to play in the capital structure, how you want to structure transactions. That is not just one transaction and they're done. For example, we like to build these growth vehicles that we'll continue to talk about. This quarter we talked about Oakmont and Aspect, but as you can see, you know, you go back and look at five quarters ago or six quarters ago, we probably talked about Remnar Organization, and you see this quarter we started $100-plus million of MLPs, right? So our job is not only to see, okay, where can we get the, you know, sort of the play, state of play right now, which is the deep value end of the play, but also create these growth vehicles that changes the growth rate through the cycle, right? That's what we are focused on. And I'll be honest with you, Derek, I'm very, very proud of this team that has created. I think this company will have unprecedented growth that will be unmatched in its history. And I think it is relatively understood the cyclical sort of bounds of that, but I think it is fairly, fairly misunderstood on what this cycle can look like.
spk14: Thank you. I show our next question comes from the line of Connor Siversky from Barenburg. Please go ahead.
spk07: Good morning, everybody. Thanks for having me. Great quarter. A bit of an abstract question maybe. So operating under the assumption that the target demographic for seniors has a lot of net worth tied up in home equity, If we were to potentially see a blip in the housing market as prices maybe come off peaks, could that translate into some kind of transitory impacts on rate or report? Or do you think the demand environment currently is strong enough to offset that kind of dynamic?
spk17: If you believe that housing prices can come down 50%, which I think is how much it's up in the last few years, three, four years, in many, many places, then yes. But also remember that that you are talking about people who have bought their houses in the 80s and 90s, right? They're sitting on significant amount of household sort of network that should not impact. I will give you, go back and look at how assisted living has done, senior housing in general has done during the global financial crisis where you got a massive crash of housing prices and see how the asset class has done. Just as a hint, I think that was you know, senior housing was one of the best performing asset clubs through the global financial crisis, through that housing bust. So that should give you some hint. I'm a student of history. Every cycle is different. I'm not going to sit here and pontificate how much this might play out, but I will tell you that, you know, housing has an impact on many aspects of the economy, and it has a particular impact because senior housing is not an income play, it's an asset play, and mostly it is an housing type of an asset place. But remember, who is your customer? It's an 85-year-old, and she's sitting on a house that probably she bought in 1988.
spk14: Thank you. I show our last question comes from the line of Daniel Bernstein from Capital One. Please go ahead.
spk05: Good morning. I guess I just wanted to see if we could drill down a little bit into the Canadian asset leading indicators. I mean, if That has trailed a little bit, and your numbers would have been even better than you had posted if Canada had performed. So I just wanted to see if we could drill down a little bit on what's going on with the tours, leads, some of those leading indicators on the Canadian seniors, Allison.
spk17: Okay, so Dan, I mentioned this in my prepared remarks. You know, April and May, we have seen that drag that you were talking about really percolated up in June. We've seen almost doubling up in-person tours, et cetera, in June. Canada, by and large, opened up, you know, significantly in the beginning of July. So we are seeing that is starting to reflect again. and we expect that Canada will catch up, right? So sort of it's a draft today, but I would expect that you will see some significant sequential improvement in Canada as we get through the rest of the year. Tim, you want to add anything?
spk16: Yes, in July, Chuck mentioned tours interest. We've seen actually tours and inquiries reach 2019 levels. So if we look at how The recovery occurred in the U.S. There was about a month lag between when we kind of saw that start to happen in February and February when we started to see occupancy turn. So I'm not saying it'll follow the same pattern, but we've seen first kind of flattening of the decrease in occupancy, and then we've seen these leading indicators move. So we're certainly hopeful that we'll start to see those fundamentals turn here in the third quarter.
spk14: Thank you. This concludes our Q&A session and today's conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now all disconnect. Everyone have a good day. This concludes today's Q&A session. Thank you, everyone, for participating. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer

This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

-

-