This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk11: And welcome to the Scorpio Tankers Inc. First quarter 2023 conference call. I would now like to turn the call over to James Stone, head of corporate development and IR. Please go ahead, sir.
spk08: Thank you for joining us today. Welcome to the Scorpio Tankers first quarter 2023 earnings conference call. On the call with me today are, Emanuel A. Loro, chief executive officer, Robert Bugbee, president, Cameron Mackey, chief operating officer, Brian Lee, chief financial officer, Chris Savella, chief accounting officer, Water Stanker-Nielsen, commercial director. Earlier today we issued our first quarter earnings press release, which is available on our website, scorpiotankers.com. The information discussed on this call is based on information as of today, May 2nd, 2023, and may contain forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty. Actual results may differ materially from those set forth in such statements. For discussion of these risks and uncertainties, you should review the forward-looking statement disclosure in the earnings press release, as well as Scorpio Tankers SCC filings, which are available at scorpiotankers.com and scc.gov. All participants are advised that the audio of this conference call is being broadcasted live on the internet, and is also being recorded for playback purposes. An archive of the webcasts will be made available on the investor relations page of our website for approximately 14 days. We will be giving a short presentation today. The presentation is available at scorpiotankers.com on the investor relations page under reports and presentations. The slides will also be available on the webcast. After the presentation, we will go to Q&A. For those asking questions, please limit the number of questions to two. If you have an additional question, please rejoin the queue. Now I'd like to introduce our chief executive officer,
spk10: Emanuel Iwera. Thank you, James, and thank you for joining us today. In the first quarter, the company generated 286 million in EBITDA, and 196 million in adjusted net income. This compares with the first quarter last year, when the company generated an adjusted loss of around $15 million. So we're starting 2023 with $210 million more in adjusted net income compared to 2022. Today we have $800 million of pro forma liquidity. We see an order book near record lows, an aging fleet, constructive demand for refined products, refinery dislocations, and a time chapter market with duration and high rates which continue to improve. Corp of Anchors is a young and large fleet with significant operating leverage, and most importantly, minimal cap ex. We do not intend to grow the company, rather we intend to harvest. The balance sheet has, and we continue to see a reduction in leverage, but we will look to optimize it as well. Our new $750 to $1 billion term loan and revolving credit facility, while still under discussion, can accelerate the repurchase of more expensive lease financing and can create more balance sheet flexibility. The revolver increases the flexibility and efficiency of managing the two critical levers vital to shipping companies, leverage and liquidity. While overall debt reduction continues to be our priority, our strong financial position continues to improve and has allowed us to start to return capital to shareholders. Since July, 2022, we have repurchased seven and a half million of our common shares for $350 million. Today we announced the renewal of our security repurchase program for up to $250 million and an increase of our quarterly dividend from 20 cents per share to 25 cents per share. Finally, it is with mixed feelings that I must announce today that Brian Lee, our Chief Financial Officer, will be stepping down in September of this year. He will be replaced by Chris Avella, who has been with the company since 2010 and currently serves as our Chief Accounting Officer. Brian's leadership and experience has been instrumental in the growth and development of the company over the last 13 years. He's been with us since the beginning and leaves the company in its strongest financial position with a well-trained team poised to maintain high standards. Brian, I will miss you. We will miss you. We will miss your unparalleled work ethic, your temperament and character too. I'm truly grateful for your contribution to the company and wish you the best on a well-deserved retirement. And by the way, if you change your mind, now that the Chief Accounting position is open, I'm sure that Chris will hire you in a heartbeat. With that, I'd like to turn the call to James for a brief presentation.
spk08: Thank you, Emmanuel. Slide seven, please. We have seen an elevated rate environment since Q1 of last year, and over the last five quarters, we've generated a window under $1.4 billion in EBITDA, of which $1.1 billion has gone to debt repayment. And as Emmanuel mentioned, since July of 2022, we've repurchased 350 million of the company's shares. We have 15 vessels on time to our contract, and the most recent charter was in LR2 for three years at $40,000 per day. The remaining 98 vessels are operating in the spot market. Slide eight, please. We continue to repurchase vessels under expensive lease financing, and have started to refinance some of these vessels with new bank credit facilities that have lower interest margins. To the right, you can see the list of vessels that have been repurchased and are upcoming. So far, we have given notice to repurchase 42 vessels. And when we say repurchased, it's really paying off the outstanding debt on the vessel. As of today, we have repurchased or repaid the outstanding debt on 28 vessels. And in Q2, we will repurchase 13 vessels on lease financing for 325 million. The margin on the lease financing ranges from LIBOR plus 350 to 525 basis points. And the new loan facilities have a margin of SOFR plus 190 to 197 basis points. Given the credit adjustment spread between SOFR and LIBOR, the LIBOR equivalent margin of our new financing is around 170 basis points. The criminal who have done a great job. Slide nine, please. Timing differences between repurchasing vessels on lease financing and drawing down on new facilities mean that at times it appears debt is increasing. On the left, you can see the movements between the new facilities being drawn and debt being repaid. In the first half of this year, including drawdowns on new facilities, we expect to reduce our debt by 146.2 million. If you look at the graph on the right, compared to December, 2021, by June 30th this year, the company will have reduced its debt by 1.4 billion and repaid 1.1 billion for lease financing. Until recently, the debt repayments have been done primarily with free cashflow. However, with the new 750 million to $1 billion term and revolving loan facility, we can accelerate these lease purchases and optimize the balance sheet. The revolving component of the new loan will allow us to manage leverage and liquidity. After completed, the changes will translate to lower breakeven rates for the fleet as amortization and interest costs decline. By 10, please. This December 31st, 2021 net debt has decreased 1.5 billion. Today, on a pro forma basis, we have over 800 million pro forma liquidity and with no new buildings on order, we have minimal capex. We are very well positioned. By 11, please. In Q2 so far, including time charters, the fleet is averaging almost $40,000 per day. On an annual basis, this will translate to almost $20 per share in free cashflow or over a 38% free cashflow year. These are exciting times. By 13, please. Despite significant refinery maintenance in the first half of this year, a reduction in European imports after building inventory ahead of sanctions and a warm winter, rates have remained strong. European product imports have increased to normalized levels. Refinery maintenance will decline considerably over the next two months and global inventories remain well below five-year averages. All of this leads to strong expectations for the remainder of the year, especially the back-up and neck. By 14, please. Demand has been robust. While we do expect slightly lower diesel demand due to less trucking activity, the increase in gasoline, jet fuel, and nap, are more than offset the lower diesel demand. We expect refined product demand to average one and a half to two million barrels per day more from Q2 to Q4 than last year and go up throughout the remainder of the year. Two more volumes remain extremely high and are averaging 1 to 1.5 billion barrels per day, more than 2019 levels. Given low global inventories, increased consumption will continue to be met through imports with product tankers reallocating barrels around the world. Slide 15, please. While demand is above pre-COVID levels, refining capacity is lower and more dislocated. Regional capacity changes are structural and will continue to drive ton miles and flows for the coming years. After a brief surge in product exports at the end of last year, Chinese exports have now returned to normalized levels. And while OPEC cuts will restrict crude exports, they do not restrict products, and the Middle East has been the incremental barrel of refined product. They're one of the few areas with refining capacity coming online for the export market, and most of these exports are going long hauled to Europe and Asia. As ton mile demand increases, vessel capacity is reduced and supply tightened. Slide 16, please. At the start of sanctions, Russian product exports declined, but over the last two months have been above pre-sanction level. And prior to sanctions, most of the Russian exports were going to Europe, and now they are going longer hauled Almost every replacement route, aside from Turkey, is longer than the previous route, and these new flows will drive a significant increase in ton mile. On the other side, Europe has to replace the lost Russian imports, and these will be from farther away. The gray fleet are vessels that are servicing Russia, has increased significantly, to 322 vessels today, of which 254 are Handymax and MR vessels. Once these vessels load at Russian ports, they are unable to service the US or Europe. The impact of vessel servicing Russia is expected to have a significant impact on the capabilities of the global feed. While unclear if Russia will be able to maintain current levels, it's very clear these volumes are needed given the low inventories around the world. Slide 17. I know there's been some more new building orders over the last two months, and probably more than in this graph, but the overall order book as a percentage of the fleet still remains near historical lows. And in December, clean tanker rates reached record levels while the order book was at an all-time low. So we do expect additional orders given the strong rate environment in each fleet. However, there are still long lead times for the delivery of new-build vessels. Shipyards are busy with orders from other sectors, and vessels ordered today will not deliver until 2026. Also, new builds are expensive compared to historical levels, and concerns about different propulsion systems to meet environmental regulation and the cost of these systems act as a constraint to ordering. Slide 18, please. When thinking about new building orders and fleet growth, the age profile of the fleet must be considered. On the lower left, you can see that from 2023 through 2026, 680 MR and LR product tankers will turn 15 years old. By 2026, there will be 815 product tankers 20 years and older. And on a percentage basis, that means 50% of the HandyMax fleet, 23% of the MR, 29% of the LR1s, and 12% of the LR2s will be older than 20 years by 2026. But we always prefer to see low ordering activity. The number of vessels turning 15 and those that will be 20 and older is staggering and should be put into context. Slide 14, please. While the order book is at a record low, the spot market continues to remain at very strong levels. One and three-year time charter rates are at high levels and evidence that our customer's outlook is one of increasing exports in ton miles against a constrained supply curve. What's different today is that typically as rates improve, the order book builds and oversupply more than often leads to a decline in rates. But we have only seen modest order book growth. Using minimal scrapping assumptions, the fleet will grow less than 1% over the next three years. And using higher scrapping assumptions and fleet age due to upcoming environmental regulation, the fleet is likely to shrink over the next three years. Seaboard exports in ton mile demand are expected to increase .4% and .5% this year and 4% and .1% next year. Vastly outpacing supply. The conclusive factors in today's market are constructive individually, historically low inventories, increasing demand, exports in ton miles, structural dislocations in the refinery system, rerouting of global product flows and limited fleet growth. But collectively, they are unprecedented. And at last, but certainly not least, Brian, it has been a pleasure to work for you over the last 10 years. Thank you for being a great mentor, leader, and friend to so many of us. You have always been the last person in the office, the first to give credit and the last to take it. Your hard work, humble attitude, and great sense of humor will be missed. I wish you the best in retirement. With that, I'd like to turn it over to Q&A.
spk11: Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on a telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star, then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question is from the line of John Trapple with Evercore. Please go ahead.
spk07: Thank you. Good morning. Brian, echo the comments. It's been a real pleasure and you'll be missed. Maybe Lars, if we can pull you in here. James had some really great slides kind of explaining what's happened since the start of the year, but certainly some of the recent momentum, especially in the MR segment, has been somewhat seasonal, but maybe a little bit more extreme than anticipated a couple months ago. Is it strictly a function of refinery maintenance and that's what gives you a more optimistic view on the back half of the year? Or is there something else going on, either seasonally or counter seasonally in the MR market recently that's caused some weakness?
spk01: Hi, John. I think, putting things in context, I think rates for the current quarter has actually held up quite nicely. The market is certainly a lot more volatile that we've seen when markets were poor and we had a flatlining market. And I think that volatility really defines that tightness, but we are operating from a higher base in terms of earnings. A lot of the things that we're seeing right now has been an MR market, particularly in the Atlantic Basin, which we saw a little bit of a drop or a substantial drop from mid-April. But apart from the mid-April drop in the Atlantic Basin, I think it has performed quite well in the second quarter. And I would actually argue that rates in the Atlantic Basin have bottomed out. And I think even for this morning, the market for the TC2 has increased by 20 points in one go coming out of the box. So as we start emerging out of this tremendous turnaround that James was talking about, I think we are coming into a season in a very good place. I'm personally very constructive, the rate environment for the second half of the year and also balance of the second quarter. And I think that the adage of the stronger for longer that people have been bantering about certainly is valid from where I sit. Generally speaking, when as James was talking about, the stocks are low, refining margins, complex refining margins are still positive. You've got a new capacity that's coming online. And I think one of the key components here in terms of where the market is, the connectivity in the regional markets is defining and a fundamental role that's underpinning by this tighter supply that we, alternatives that we've been seeing. So generally speaking, you're seeing a lot of imports coming further afield, the Russian sanctions that everybody knows about, they will continue to influence the supply chains. So I think a lot that we've seen, just to answer your question, we've seen is the substantial turnaround in all three regions has been playing a big role. I think the, in April, if I'm looking at my numbers, you had global refining main since topping at 9.4 million barrels. And I think by June, July, 6 million of those refining capacity will return to the market. You then add on the additional new capacity from Al-Zor, which is gonna have its third train up and running in the third quarter. GESAN is at 50% at the moment, that's gonna increase as well. So there's plenty of additional product that's there to be moved. And I think this is just, to be honest, a market correction in terms of the refining turnaround that particular has been strong in April.
spk07: Okay, super helpful, thank you Lars. For my second question, I don't know if it's for James or Robert or maybe back to you Lars, it seems like the pace of your one and three year time charter contract has slowed a little bit from the back half of last year. But if I look at slide 19 on the upper right hand side, the rate for the MR1 year and the three year for, and the one year for LR2 has been pretty stable. So has that just been more of a strategic decision to hold on to more spot exposure as we go into the back half of the year that Lars just laid out or maybe those rates holding in there but the liquidity's dried up a little bit?
spk04: Well, I think it's partly that. I think that if I just take the first question, I think that the, all weakness is relative. So I understand that the market may be slightly weaker than its full time record highs, but we would hardly describe a market that's averaging 40,000 a day in the second quarter bookings a week. I mean, that's huge, $20 annualized run rates on a $50 stock is thank you very much. And that's important because we're seeing a very steep discount many points during this first quarter of the actual three year charter rate to the actual spot market. And what Lars has greatly pointed out, John, is indicating for the balance of this year. And we don't necessarily, and at the same time, our balance sheet is getting stronger and stronger and stronger. And therefore the requirement or the need or the wish to seek the security of a three year charter is less when we're getting such confirmation in the actual spot market and doing it. I mean, we simply have an incredible situation where every single report that we're reading indicates that we're gonna continue to see growth in product and product demand, headline product demand around the world for the balance of the year. Regardless, if we're reading someone who's very pessimistic about the world economy thinking it's in recession or going into recession. And we know that the actual fleet itself is fixed. And we know that those ton mile multipliers related to the final research might continue. So I think a lot of it is we've been really choosy. We've hit the record rate on our three year charters and our LRTs each point over these last three months. But there's no, there's less of a need because I guess we're more optimistic about what's happening. I mean, think of all the doubt we've been through in this first quarter, what you've been talking about. And we end up in the second quarter right now. That is really a terrific base for what we could see going forward.
spk06: Yep, that all makes sense. And we have
spk04: 800 million dollars in pro forma cash and we're just about to do an incredible refinancing so that balance to create time shutter security is really just going down.
spk07: Yep, thank you Robert, thanks Lars.
spk11: Thank you. Thank you. A reminder to all participants, if you have a question, please press star then one. Our next question is from the line of Omar Nocta with Jeffries, please go ahead.
spk12: Thank you, you guys, good morning. Also Brian, congrats on the retirement. We'll miss working with you. You're leaving obviously the company in great shape. We've got pro forma 800 million of cash here. We'll have to just sort of ask about kind of priorities and I think, Emanuel, you sort of outlined this early on. You've got the 1.4 billion of net debt. Can you maybe rank your priorities in terms of the use of cash in the next few quarters and if you guys have set yet a target of what you'd left that net debt number to get to?
spk04: We haven't set the target for the net debt but we have said that we don't intend to go to zero. We're also creating a debt facility on top of other commercial lending debt facilities which would probably, if you added those up, would give you some kind of base position and then you're going to have normal amortization probably from that point. There's no target yet set. So we're gonna continue really with what we've done for the last quarters. We're going to take down our total debt
spk05: and
spk04: we are going to prioritize buying back those sale lease back too and when the new facility is closed, that's going to really accelerate that basis. But we still, we're able to do all those things and we still have ample capacity to take advantage and create value for our shareholders through buying back stock. You know, if the opportunity at what we see as very value creating level remains and that's why we've increased the, gone back and re-increased the share buyback. You know, I think we've shown the market that we're not increasing sharebacks for show. We're increasing the shareback buybacks so that they can be used.
spk12: Yep, thanks Robert. Yeah, you've bumped the dividend and then you've recharged the buyback. So clear indication there. And then maybe just second question would be, you know, asset values continue to push higher here. Does that change at all your view on, you know, how you've been conducting the business? Does it go from harvesting the assets today versus say monetizing down the line? How do you think about that in this context?
spk04: I think we're, you know, especially when you've got very large spreads now. I mean, the spread between our, our NAV or our calculated NAV and, you know, the stock price has only increased in the last three or four months. So the, you know, it's the cash you've seen has come in and look, we're open and I think it's fair to say that, you know, we are prepared and are indeed in discussions when it comes to taking advantage and, you know, maybe selling a couple, two, three, four, or whatever the older vessels. That would just be a smart thing to do with when you've got such a wide discrepancy at the moment.
spk12: Yeah, yeah, it makes sense. All right, well, thanks, Robert. I'll turn it over.
spk11: Thank you. Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Stambland with JP Morgan, please go ahead.
spk06: Yeah, thanks, thanks for taking the questions. The first one is, I guess we're aware of the sort of more midterm supply and demand picture, but then you've got all these different sort of shorter term effects like refinery maintenance and inventory levels.
spk05: Do you,
spk06: can you just talk, I know you touched on those in the opening comments, but where roughly do you think we are on those sort of shorter term effects? Are we kind of at the peak sort of headwind phase and from here it turns to tailwinders, refineries, activity starts increasing or where roughly do you think we are in that cycle? Thanks.
spk11: Lars, James.
spk08: I'll start. Good question, Sam. Look, I think for almost two years, we've seen massive draws in inventory. And right now we look at a market where Russia has been able to export more product than pre-sanctioned levels, but it's unclear if they'll be able to maintain those level of exports in the long term. And there's a lot of assumptions around those volumes being moved into the market. But I do think the inventory data, if you look specifically at the US because it comes out weekly, diesel is 12% below the five-year average, gasoline is something like 7% below the five-year average. So we're seeing inventories continue to decline despite higher volumes. And so I think as we move to the back half of this year, demand is going to increase from a gasoline jet and not the perspective. And it's going to be much more than a slight drop in say, disparate demand from trucking. So we're still extremely bullish on the outlook. And we haven't seen anything in our market, whether it's flows or volumes, as shown in the graph, that suggests things are lower. And we do expect a stronger back half for demand this year.
spk06: Okay, maybe I could ask the second one. It's on the order book number. I think it's 6% in the presentation. I mean, that's come up very slightly. What's your sense of your market participants? Are we starting to see a real acceleration in orders? Or would you say it's still quite subdued at the moment? And I suppose, do you have any sort of feeling on where you'd be happy for that 6% number to go to and still think that the supply and demand was quite healthy? Thank you.
spk04: Maybe I can try that one. I think that as the orders come in, they go further away. So the easy pickings, I would say more or less gone and the easy pickings would have been the filling in the N225 birds in the early 2026 birds. So now each step is even more expected to, even more expensive to go out. And I think that when you're booking forward the market two and a half years, I think that you don't really begin to even think about things until you're up to a 10% total on order. And that itself wouldn't be very much. That's just 3% each year. And that would just be in historic terms. Now we have a situation where if you look at the graphs that Graeme James put up, there's severe stress out of that in the industry in terms of overaging to the product. So you've got to set that in the context of how many ships are gonna be turning 15 years old, turning older over this next three, four, five year period. And that's huge, way more than the 10%. So I think that we can be, I get the headlines, the headlines now look as if there's an acceleration, there is a little bit of acceleration. It's kind of dramatic and it's oh my God, what's happening. But when you put it in the perspective of the actual ongoing fleet, it's not something that we're concerned about at all. But I think that in general terms, you want to look at tanker fleets or any type of shipping fleet once you cross 10 and then you have to put it in the perspective of what's likely to be moved in the fleet going forward as to whether 10 is acceptable, the above 10 is acceptable or not. But up until 10 here, we're all pretty safe.
spk01: Robert, last year, I mean, I just think also, I'd just like to add the ships that you were talking about, they're also gonna be struggling to meet the new carbon regulations that they kind of are being introduced in the coming years, right? So they'll kind of be more inefficient and potentially will also kind of increase the scrapping element to it as we move along the line.
spk06: Understood, okay, thank you very much.
spk04: Yeah, and I'd just like to highlight, for everybody, these are the two red herrings we see. The red herring we see is the, oh my God, we're seeing these new buildings ordered. And the other one is this thing to do with recession and headline demand. Because just the increase in jet fuel going along around the world, which is tremendously important thing for the product market, especially new ships or whatever, is we can't get to a scenario over these next quarters where you don't get continued product anchor demand. And that's even without dealing with, just trying to refill inventories, which is required. Thank you. Join the next question, please.
spk11: Our next question is from the line of Ken Hoxter from Bank of America, please go ahead.
spk03: Great, good morning, Brian, definitely good luck in the next phase and thank you for all the help over the years. It's been a great education in learning about the business. So thank you to you and the team and good luck. Maybe Robert Emanuel, you're talking about the oldest fleet or the aging fleet overall, kind of very slim new orders, although some are coming on, harvesting the fleet, maybe selling some vessels at the peak here, or selling some vessels. Are we then looking at the peak of the market if we're starting to see those new orders that you're talking about coming in, you're looking at maybe selling some vessels, just how should we step back and think about that? And then as the second part to that, do you need to renew your fleet as it starts to age here? Do you need to go in and maybe it's not expansion, but it's just simply renewal of the fleet? Is that something you'd look at or is it just more monetizing at strong levels?
spk04: Well, what we need to do is to provide our shareholders a return. And we can get selfish with it. We need to, as Jack Welch said, show me how a person's paid and I'll show you how they manage. Well, insiders are the largest shareholder of Scorpio Tonkin. So the idea of selling old vessels, that's nothing to do with whether or not we think the market has peaked to which we don't think the market has peaked. It is all about the fact that, as Lars has pointed out, older vessels are going to become harder to manage over the next couple of years. Whereas older vessels, we could simply sell the older vessels and you could use that capital to accelerate the debt payment or accelerate the stock we purchase, depending on if the stock continues to be massively discounted to its NAV. But there's no requirement for us to renew at all. And our fleet can quite happily, with age and go through for many years going forward here.
spk03: Okay. And then maybe Brian, if I could bring you back in, the OPEX, I just want to run through, obviously you noted it was down because of the fewer vessels. I guess COVID costs came off. Maybe talk about what's going to happen with OPEX going forward given inflation and your thoughts on OPEX into 2Q and second half.
spk09: That's exactly right, inflation. So there's still some inflationary pressure and delivery costs and things like that of goods being delivered. So we think it may take up a little bit higher from where it is here. So again, if it was less between this quarter, last year, this quarter, this year, and last year is because less vessels. But we do disclose the average daily costs. So that's in there. I think that again, that's going to move up a little bit over the next few quarters here.
spk03: Can we put parameters on that or?
spk09: Tell me how much inflation is going to be, where our equipment is going to be delivered. So you can look at it. I don't know, three, two, 3% for now. All right,
spk03: great. Thanks for the time and thoughts. Appreciate it guys. Thanks Ken.
spk11: Thank you. Next question is from the line of Froude Mocter with Clarkson Securities. Please go ahead.
spk13: Thank you. Hi guys. Nice discussion on the refinery turnarounds and the product inventories. I guess I have a high level question on arbitrage trading. I guess at least historically it was fascinating to see, let's say one barrel of jet fuel could be resold many times after it was produced. And that led to this very high multiplier, maybe four or five times compared to oil demand in terms of trade. So I'm curious to see or know how prevalent is this phenomenon today. And do you actually see barrels moving from, let's say Europe to New York and then being resold to other destinations and so on? Or is this something that could be forthcoming?
spk01: I thought it was Latio. I'm gonna try and give a stab at that. I mean, there is no doubt that the product market in general from the trading perspective is traded multiple times. And we have seen multiple times and throughout that we have a change of orders or there is a different trading behavior depending on where that particular arbitrage is. I mean, of late, there has been some spreads going on where you've seen a lot more Caribbean cargoes that have been destined to a New York harbor because of the pricing structure. That is product that has initially come from the East of Sue, from India or whatever. And you then see them putting them into storage and then breaking bulk and moving different places. We see cargoes moving into the US West Coast and in particular into Mexico on the West Coast which previously would have been cargo that had been sourced out of the US Gulf. And we have seen throughout the first quarter a lot more cargoes suddenly being moved into Mexico and the West Coast out of North China and Southeast Asia in general. So in terms of the diversity of cargo base and in terms of how that moves around, we see a very healthy level of disparity around that. And obviously this is one of the things that we in the product market really enjoy is the ability to triangulate and that we certainly have been able to see at a large extent. And I've talked about this before, in particular the LR2s, we have been seeing how that particular unit has moved from a one-dimensional laden ballast type of vessel into being a true arbitrage mover. We are today moving LR2s into Japan or North Asia then reloading in North Asia and China, down into Australia, then we then load again out of Australia and take it back up to North Asia or into the AG or even to West Africa and then reload out of West Africa, et cetera. So this whole kind of way of a fungible market in products is certainly still there, I think it's gonna remain to say. And because of the kind of very constrained logistical chains that are in place, we will start to see a lot more of Congress double handling on the back of what we've seen with the Russian sanctions and this obviously will increase 10 miles as well.
spk13: Perfect, that's very good. My second question is on the new refineries in the Middle East, any update since the last time you talked about that, what do you see as incremental effects on the product market going forward?
spk01: Thank you. So, I mean, this is only what I have heard and it's not something that is kind of reported officially, et cetera, but we know that the two out of the three trains at Al-Zor and Kuwait are up and running. I have heard that the third train is gonna be coming up and running in the third quarter and we will at the end of the year start seeing 640,000 barrels per day of product being shipped out of Kuwait, which is substantial. That incremental barrel obviously is gonna make huge marginal change in the supply of vessels as these vessels that are learning out of Kuwait are all gonna be going long haul for a large part, particularly the distillate will be going west of sewers and the light ends will be going east, which again is gonna influence the ton mile in a very positive sense. I've heard that the Jisan refinery is now up and running around 50%, and that also is increasing as we set out into the second half of the year. So there is a lot of additional capacity that is just about to come up and running. They are already open. We can see already on the volumes that are coming out of both of Kuwait and out of Jisan and the Red Sea has made a fundamental impact in product tankers, not only on LR2s, but also on the MRs, and that's certainly something that we are very happy with to see. That will increase again in the second half of the year.
spk13: Perfect, that's good. That's great, Marcy, thank you.
spk11: Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Sharif Al-Maghrabi with VTIG, please go ahead.
spk05: Good morning, thanks for taking my question. I wanna ask, how are you thinking about returning capital going forward? Because the dividends saw a nice boost and also the share repurchase program got reset. Obviously the stand lease backs are a priority, but it's looking like you have a line of sight on that now, which would free up more cash flows for other activities.
spk04: Sure. Well, I think we did look what we recently did. We bought back a lot of stock in the first quarter. I can't remember exactly what it was, but it was five, six percent of the company. And we can see that our debt is projected to be going down and the cash and liquidity is as high or higher than it was at the beginning of the first quarter and the rate guidance is higher. The stock's moving nowhere. So, you would expect that that would be a strong priority of allocation of capital at the moment, combined with a continued strategy of taking debt down. We thank you for observing the dividend. We said before that we're raising a regular dividend. We're doing it in increments that can be some kind of guide to the future and we're not going to go to percentage payout positions, but we would always leave it open if required to do extraordinary dividends. But all these, that really depends on where the value is in the stock price. You have a major dislocation right now between, forget the actual NEB, that's one way of measuring it. As James pointed out, the present runway, we're nearly making something $20, $21 a share in cash flow on a pretty new fleet. And that's on an annualized basis and we then combine that with the largest view of the market. If you forgot cash flow, you're basically indicating that that is going to, the value in the company is even going to be more discounted going forward. But that is overwhelmingly higher priority at the moment because of that, or has been in that first quarter period.
spk05: Thank you very much.
spk11: Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Liam Burke with B. Riley FBR, please go ahead.
spk00: Thank you. Has it been, I know time charter activity is sort of flattened out here, but has there been any recognition by your customers that there's a impending shortage as the MRs age for them to start time chartering either on longer durations or higher rates?
spk01: I just want to say that there is, yeah, there's still a decent quality for TC business even with kind of the very brief slowdown that we've seen. I think it's fair to say that end users share the same constructive view of longer term market rates and we see plenty of questions coming across, rates still at elevated levels compared to last. And the last time I've seen this type of interest for three to five year time charters is probably mid 2000s. So there's plenty of interest out there.
spk00: Okay, great. And the balance, I mean, you talked about the dividend and buybacks in terms of the balance, but is there an NAV for your fleet that you consider when looking at your buybacks or is it just stock price?
spk04: No, of course we look at the NAV and we look at the cashflow and then we look at what we can afford to go back to the question that before. I mean, you can see what's happening in the balance sheet and there's going to be, we are not going to take the debt down to zero. We don't go and negotiate $570 million of bank credit and then negotiate up to a billion with the idea that you're gonna pay the whole thing down in a year. That would be massively inefficient. So we're going to have a base level of debt. That level is going to be very low compared to not even the real loan to value, but it's going to be very low to the book value of the company, which is substantially lower than where the loan to value is. When that point is reached, obviously if you still got a huge amount of cash, which we would hope to have too, all of the income coming in then becomes surplus to what's happening. So when you're measuring buybacks, the net asset value is only one guide. We're trying to model where the company is worth in the end of the year. We're also trying to, in two years, three years, we're also trying to model it in terms of we got something wrong if there's something that we can't account for and let's say values were down 30% or something. So you look at it that way. At the moment it's not too difficult to calculation either way.
spk00: Great, thank you, Robert.
spk11: Thank you. Our next question is from Chris Robertson with Deutsche Bank, please go ahead.
spk02: Hey guys, thanks for taking my question and Brian, good luck with retirement. That switches towards you into the future. I just wanted to ask here around the scrubber fuel spreads come down a bit over the last few months. Can you comment about what's been driving that? Do you think this is a structural change or is this a seasonal effect?
spk08: I'll take that one. Hey Chris, I don't think it's structural. I think if you look at the demand for high sulfur fuel, it's predominantly for vessels with scrubbers and for power generation in the Middle East. I think the pressure is coming from distillate and you've seen distillate cracks come down, you've seen diesel prices come down and it's just a reversal of what we've seen for the last two years. You've had a very, very strong and tight distillate market. People have been worried about shortages and so it's probably an overreaction to that but for the foreseeable future, we're still constructive on that spread. Does it hit the high 300s as it has in the past? Maybe not, but 100 to 250 I think is a reasonable range.
spk02: Okay, yeah, thanks for that. And just following up on a few questions from earlier around kind of the new building orders and this really relates to shipyard capacity. So as you look at the aging fleet, not only on the product side but also the crude side and in the dry bulk market as well, what are your thoughts on capacity to be able to handle kind of these fleet renewal efforts that seem to need to be done? And shipyard capacity, can that be ramped up over the coming years to accommodate all these things or do you think there'll be a crunch which further kind of limits fleet growth?
spk04: James?
spk08: Well, I was actually looking at shipyard capacity and if you compare it to historical levels, it's certainly down. I wasn't looking at other sectors, I wasn't really looking at products but if you look at the MR fleet that's on the water today, I think something like 800 or since delivered actually, so out of 2200 ships, I think 800 are from shipyards that are no longer active. So there's certainly capacity but I think the best answer to your question is if you wanted to order a lot of ships today, they wouldn't come till 2026, right? And that's what you're seeing with the last couple orders and 2025 is full. And so I do think there's gonna be a constraint on the capacity side. But even if you were to order hundreds of ships, given the age distribution of the fleet, there's going to be more ships turning 15 to 20 than will be delivered over the next couple years.
spk02: All right, yeah, got it. All right, thanks for the time, appreciate it.
spk08: Thanks, Chris.
spk11: Thank you. This concludes our question and our session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Emmanuel Loro for any closing remarks.
spk10: We don't have any closing remarks other than thanking everybody for their time today. So we'll speak to you soon. Thanks a lot, the call may be concluded.
spk11: The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now.
Disclaimer