The Boeing Company

Thank you for standing by. Good day everyone and welcome to the Boeing Company's second quarter 2024 earnings conference call. Today's call is being recorded. The management discussion and the slide presentation plus the analyst question and answer session are being broadcast live over the internet. To ask a question on today's conference, please press the digit one followed by the digit zero on your touch tone telephone. Again, it's 1-0 for questions. After pressing 1-0, you will hear that you have been placed in queue. Pressing 1-0 again will take you out of queue and may prevent you from being able to ask a question. At this time, for opening remarks and introductions, I'm turning the call over to Mr. Matt Welch, Vice President of Investor Relations for the Boeing Company. Mr. Welch, please go ahead.

Thank you, Lois, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Boeing's quarterly earnings call. I am Matt Welch, and with me today are Dave Calhoun, Boeing's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Brian West, Boeing's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As a reminder, you can follow today's broadcast and slide presentation at Boeing.com. Projections, estimates, and goals included in today's discussion involves risk including those described in our SEC filings and in the forward-looking statement disclaimer at the beginning of the presentation. We also refer you to the additional disclaimers related to the Spirit Aerosystems transaction at the beginning of the presentation, as well as the disclosures relating to non-GAAP measures in our earnings release and presentation. Now I will turn the call over to Dave Calhoun.

Thanks, Matt. Good morning to all and thanks for joining us. First, you saw the news that the company has announced the appointment of Kelly Ortberg as my successor, commencing August 8th of this calendar year. As you know, the board conducted an extensive search process. It was led by Steve Malenkov. I am incredibly grateful to the way in which he conducted it and the extent to which he conducted it. and I'm extremely confident in their selection of Kelly as the next leader for Boeing. He's had more than 35 years of experience in aerospace and is tremendously respected in the industry. I look forward to working with him to ensure a smooth transition. I want to focus my upfront comments on the progress that we are making on our recovery as we strengthen our quality management systems and position the company in the best possible way as we move forward. Brian will cover the financials following my remarks. As a company, we've been on a multi-year path to strengthen our safety and quality management systems. We've stressed our commitment to transparency every step of the way. The January accident obviously sharpened this focus, leading us to take multiple additional steps to improve the stability of our operations, including major elements of our supply chain. First among our actions was to slow things down and control travel work, allowing our supply chain to catch up and provide the buffer we need to improve quality and stabilize deliveries going forward. Our second quarter financial results reflect the reality of that continuing recovery post the Alaska accident. We're committed to doing all of the work necessary to ensure Boeing is the company the world needs it to be, safe and predictable. Over the last seven months, we've made meaningful progress toward that goal. At the end of May, we provided our comprehensive safety and quality plan to the FAA, which continues to provide strong oversight of the delivery process. The plan notes are key performance indicators by which we and our regulator will monitor the health and the quality of our production system. These measures include employee proficiency, notice of escapes, supplier shortages, rework hours, travelers at factory rollout, and ticketing performance. All of these key performance indicators, KPIs, are established and operationalized across our BCA airplane programs, and they provide real-time insight to support stability, quality, and safety. We are seeing improved performance across the majority of the metrics and remain confident in our ability to meet these KPIs as we expand production. An important element of this plan is the control limits we've established by which the FAA and, more importantly, our own team hold ourselves accountable. Furthermore, our plan doubles down on four key investments, workforce training, simplification of manufacturing plans and processes, eliminating defects, and elevating our safety and quality culture. We continue to seek feedback from our employees, from our customers, our regulators, policymakers, shareholders, and many others as we move forward. One of the most important actions we took was the transfer of our Renton fuselage inspection process to Wichita. On-site Boeing inspectors at Spirit increased by almost three times the number that we had before January, and defects we initially caught and reworked in Renton are now caught and reworked in Wichita. While this dramatically reduced the number of clean fuselages coming from Spirit in the first few months, we have seen steady improvement ever since. The improvements in quality have significantly improved our rent and flow times over that same period. While our focus remains on our factories to ensure we can meet our customer commitments, we are also making important progress on our development programs, including the 737-7, the 737-10, and our 777X. Most notably, this month, we received Type Inspection Authorization, TIA, for the 777-9 and began CERT flight testing with FAA personnel on board the aircraft. Our team has put the 777-9 test fleet through more than 1,200 flights 3,500 flight hours across a wide range of regions and climate conditions. And the certification of flight testing will continue validating the airplane's safety, reliability, and performance. In addition, we've identified an engineering solution for the engine anti-ice system for in-production aircraft that will be implemented and certified in 2025 to support the first delivery of our Dash 7 and Dash 10 in the MAX family. A comment on Boeing defense space and security performance. Clearly the results this quarter are disappointing. Brian and I have mentioned before that we expected the fixed price development programs to remain bumpy until we complete the development phase and transition to mature long-term franchise programs. Based on the lessons that we've learned in taking on these fixed price development programs, we have maintained contracting discipline for all future opportunities. We remain cautiously optimistic about the long-term prospects of our defense business, and we believe we can progress toward a more historical level of performance over time. Finally, Global Services remains a bright spot and continues to deliver solid results. We have a strong franchise, and the team remains dedicated to supporting our commercial and defense customers. Before turning it over to Brian, let me touch on the recently announced agreement to acquire Spirit Aerosystems. This is an important shift in strategic direction and it would course correct the decision made decades ago. This planned acquisition is a very significant demonstration of our resolve to invest heavily in quality and safety and to take the additional actions needed to reshape our company. As we have said, we believe this proposed deal is in the best interest of the flying public, in the best interest of our airline customers and the employees of Spirit and Boeing and the country more broadly. By bringing in critical manufacturing work back within our four walls, we can unify our safety and quality management systems and ensure our engineers and mechanics are working together as one team day in and day out. I'll close with a comment to our employees. Thank you for all that you do every single day. You care deeply about our mission, about our company, and about each other. Your passion, your resilience, and commitment are inspiring. This is a challenging period of time for all of us. There is no doubt. But I am confident, maybe more confident than I've ever been in our future because of you. And thank you. And Brian, I'll turn it over to you.

Thanks, Dave. And good morning, everyone. Before jumping into the financial results, let me take a moment on our planned acquisition of Spirit Aerosystems. On July the 1st, we announced a definitive agreement to acquire Spirit. and an all-stock transaction worth approximately $4.7 billion, with a total enterprise value of approximately $8.3 billion. As our materials indicated, we expect the transaction to close mid-2025, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including regulatory and SPIRIT shareholder approvals, as well as the sale of SPIRIT operations related to certain Airbus commercial work packages. This agreement kind of plays us acquiring substantially all Boeing related commercial operations, primarily consisting of the Wichita, Kansas, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Dallas, Texas facilities, as well as other commercial defense and aftermarket operations that would further augment our capabilities and offerings across the portfolio. Regarding the defense programs, we're committed to working with Spirit, its customers and the DOD to ensure continuity in order to support these critical missions. We continue to believe that this reintegration leverages and builds on our capabilities, supports supply chain stability, integrates critical manufacturing and engineering workforces, and allows for the ultimate unification of safety and quality management systems. Fully aligning to the same priorities, incentives, and outcomes, centered on safety and quality, is in the best interest of our customers, the aviation industry, and all stakeholders, including the flying public. All of this demonstrates our ongoing commitment to aviation safety, quality, and stability. Turning to the next page, I'll cover the total company financial performance for the quarter. Revenue was $16.9 billion, primarily reflecting lower commercial delivery volume. The core loss per share was $2.90, reflecting lower commercial delivery volume and losses of $1 billion on fixed-price defense development programs, which I'll get into later. Free cash flow was a usage of $4.3 billion in the quarter, which was generally in line with the expectations shared in May. Results were impacted by lower commercial deliveries and unfavorable working capital timing. Turning to the next page, I'll cover Boeing commercial airplanes. BCA delivered 92 airplanes in the quarter. Revenue was $6 billion and operating margin was minus 11.9%, primarily reflecting lower deliveries and expected higher period costs, including R&D. The backlog in the quarter ended at $437 billion and includes more than 5,400 airplanes. Last week's Farnborough Air Show continued to highlight the robust demand for our product lineup as we announced orders and commitments for over 150 airplanes, including nearly 100 widebodies. Now we'll give more color on the key programs. The 737 program delivered 70 airplanes in the second quarter, including a meaningful step up to 35 in June. July will be more or less in line with June levels despite normal seasonality. On production, we gradually increased during the quarter and still expect to be higher in the second half as we move to 38 per month by year end. We've reactivated the third line in our rented factory and monthly production improvement from high single digits at the end of the first quarter to roughly 25 in June and July. As Dave noted, the factory is currently operating within or near the KPI control limits laid out with the FAA as part of the safety and quality plan. The factory is operating with all fully inspected fuselages today, and near-term production will continue to be paced by fuselages from Wichita. More broadly on the master schedule, we continue to make adjustments as needed and manage supplier by supplier based on inventory levels. Our objective remains to keep the supply chain paced ahead of final assembly to support stability and minimize traveled work. The quarter ended with approximately 90 737-8s built prior to 2023, the vast majority for customers in China and India. This is down 20 from last quarter's value, and we expect approximately 10 more delivered in the month of July. We still expect to deliver most of these airplanes by year-end as we work towards shutting down the Shadow Factory. Regarding the 7 and the 10 models, Inventory levels remain stable at approximately 35 airplanes and the certification timelines remain unchanged. On the 787, we delivered nine airplanes in the quarter. Although the quarter was impacted by lower production, seat delays and other delivery timing items noted previously, we're starting to work through these issues and delivered six airplanes in July. The program produced below five per month in the quarter as expected and still plans to return to five per month by year end. We ended the quarter with around 35 airplanes inventory built prior to 2023 that required rework, which continues to progress steadily. We still expect to finish the rework and shut down the shadow factory by year end with most of these airplanes delivering this year. Finally, on the 777X program, as Dave noted, we took a very important step on the certification timeline earlier this month as the program obtained type inspection authorization and began FAA certification flight testing. We'll continue to follow the lead of the FAA as we progress through the certification process and still expect first delivery in 2025. Inventory in the quarter grew approximately $800 million in line with recent quarterly trends and will continue to grow as we move towards entry into service as we've previously contemplated. Moving on to the next page, Boeing Defense and Space. BDS booked four billion dollars in orders during the quarter including capturing an award from the U.S. Air Force for seven MH139 helicopters and the backlog ended at 59 billion dollars Revenue was $6 billion, down 2%, driven by fixed price development losses. And BDF delivered 28 aircraft in the quarter, including the first CH-47F Block II Chinook to the U.S. Army. We took a billion dollar loss on certain fixed price development contracts in the quarter, and operating margin was minus 15.2%. In late May, we indicated that margins would take a step back and be negative due to a couple of things. First, the deliberate slowdown of the Puget Sound factories has impacted the derivative programs, specifically a $391 million loss on the KC-46A tanker, as well as margin compression on the profitable P-8 program. Second, we've seen additional fixed price development cost pressures resulting in additional losses on T-7A, VC-25B, and commercial crew. primarily related to higher estimated engineering and manufacturing costs and inefficiencies associated with meeting certain technical requirements. Given the fixed price nature of these contracts, we continue to be transparent about impacts as we work to stabilize and mature these programs. While acknowledging these are disappointing results, These are complicated development programs and we continue to put milestones behind us and remain focused on retiring risk each quarter and ultimately delivering these mission critical commitments to our customers. Stepping back, the game plan to get BDS back to high single digit margins in the medium to long term remains unchanged. The core business remains solid, representing approximately 60% of our revenue and performing in the mid to high single digit margin range. The demand for these products continues to be very strong, supported by the geopolitical threat environment confronting our nation and our allies. On the 25% of the portfolio primarily comprised of fighter and satellite programs, the quarter again saw improved margin trends as we continue to make important progress, including delivering our eighth F-15EX aircraft to the U.S. Air Force, which enabled the program to achieve its initial operating capability milestone in July. We still expect to return to strong historical performance levels as we roll to new contracts with tighter underwriting standards. Overall, the defense portfolio is well positioned for the long term. There's strong demand across the customer base, the products are performing well in the field, and we're confident that our efforts to drive execution and stability will return this business to performance levels that our investors will recognize. Moving on to the next page, Boeing Global Services. BGS continued to perform well in the second quarter, delivering very strong results across a globally deployed team that is focused on supporting its customers on both the defense and commercial sides. They received $4 billion in orders, and the backlog ended at $19 billion. Revenue was $4.9 billion, up 3%, primarily on higher commercial volume. Operating margin was 17.8%, down slightly compared to last year, but still strong performance. In the quarter, BGS secured an Apache performance-based logistics contract from the U.S. Army and captured flight deck pro service contracts with Hainan Airlines and Ryanair. Importantly, BGS continued to deliver very strong operating margins for the first half of the year, matching the record levels from 2023. As a terrific franchise that's set up for years to come, the team is focused on profitable, capital-efficient, high IT offerings, and we still expect it to grow at solid mid-single-digit revenue levels and throw off mid-teen margins with very high free cash flow conversion. Turning to the next page, I'll cover cash and debt. On cash and marketable securities, we ended the quarter at $12.6 billion, reflecting the $10 billion issuance of new debt in May. partially offset by the use of free cash flow in the quarter. The debt balance increased to $57.9 billion driven by the new debt issuance. We continue to maintain access to $10 billion of revolving credit facilities, all of which remain undrawn. The deliberate actions we're taking demonstrate our commitment to improve safety and quality, and we continue to manage the business with a long-term view. We acknowledge the impact these actions are having on calendar year cash flows, so let me provide some additional context on near-term expectations. While commercial production and deliveries are improving, additional losses in BDS and working capital timing continue to weigh on near-term cash flow. Inventory will remain a near-term headwind as we prioritize supply chain stability to support future rate increases. And advanced payments will take time to improve as we stabilize production and improve predictability of deliveries to our customers. Given these near-term working capital pressures, third quarter is expected to be another use of cash. We expect these working capital timing impacts will begin to unwind as deliveries and production stabilize later this year. On the free cash flow outlook for the year, we are now expecting a larger use of cash than previously forecasted. As you know, operating leverage in our business is meaningful, and as we ramp up deliveries, free cash flow will grow. We are deliberately investing today and taking the time necessary to get it right to ensure we're positioned to ramp production in a more predictable and stable fashion. We remain committed to managing the balance sheet in a prudent manner with two main objectives. First, prioritize the investment grade rating and second, allow the factory and supply chain to reset. Both of which were supported by our decision to acquire Spirit with all stock financing. We'll continue to actively monitor our liquidity levels and as needed, we'll supplement our liquidity position with these two objectives in mind. We're confident that over time, the business performance and capital structure will return to levels fully aligned with an investment grade profile. Looking forward, we're taking the time now to ensure that our BCA factories are positioned to ramp production in a stable fashion for years to come. We'll also continue to make progress on other important objectives, including shutting down the shadow factories, maturing and de-risking the defense fixed price development programs and building on the continued strong results and services. Entering 2025 will be in a much stronger position because of the work we're doing now. As noted in the commercial market outlook published this month, we continue to see robust demand and the fundamentals are there for the next 20 years, where we expect the global fleet to almost double as nearly 44,000 new airplanes are delivered, with about half of those for replacement demand. The commercial and defense markets we serve, along with our product portfolio, underpin our confidence as we manage the business today with a long-term view built on safety, quality, and delivering for our customers. With that, let's open up for questions.

Thank you. In order that your question be clearly heard, We ask that you not use a speakerphone, cell phone, or phone headset. Please use your handset to ask a question. If you are on a speakerphone, please be sure your mute function is switched off so your signal can be reached on our equipment. As a reminder, in the interest of time, we are asking that you limit yourself to one single part question. And our first question will come from the line of Doug Hernid from Bernstein. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thank you. Now I wanted, I wanted to understand a little bit about the sort of the process, the production process on the 787 and the 737. Because you're seeing this inventory build and it appears both from suppliers supplying at 38 a month now for the max and, and five to six a month for the 787. So on that end, I expect you have an inventory build. And then on the other end, you know, difficulty with seats, so you would have things coming off the line and some of the inventory to China as well. It's difficult to get out of there. Can you talk about how you think of managing this inventory on both ends given the production process or ramp that you're on right now?

Yeah, thanks, Doug. There's no question the inventory build is right in front of us as we make this investment for stability. The way I would think about going forward, we were on the 737 to start with. Our delivery rates in April, May were in the mid-teens. June we did 35. July we'll do somewhere in that zip code. So we are seeing demonstrated progress as we continue to move forward in Renton to stabilize and get better. So the progress evidence is there, and we expect that to continue as we move through the second half. And of course, then the inventory will begin to unwind. But it's real predicated on the continued progress. And as I mentioned, that third line in Renton is a very big deal for us to get moving, as well as resuming deliveries to China. So all of those indications suggest that production is moving in the right direction. We're making progress and the inventory will unwind. On the 8-7, similarly, as I mentioned, second quarter, we had nine deliveries. In July, we've already got about six. So, again, good progress despite having some real supply chain constraints, as you mentioned. Those constraints aren't going to go away immediately, but they're going to get better. We've got a game plan in place, and we do believe that we'll get to that five per month, as we get to the end of the year. And again, that inventory will liquidate as as production performance improves.

If I can just follow up on that, the you all talked about the bottleneck chief bottleneck, I believe being the fuselage deliveries from spirit. So as you bring that third line on, How does this work? It didn't seem like it was final assembly that was the bottleneck before. So how does that help you at SPIRIT at a point now where it's your capacity that is the limiting factor?

So SPIRIT's done a very nice job. We watch it very closely. But they've had a nice, steady improvement. They're ramping their way up. We've got confidence, Pat and the team. And we believe that we will be able to fill that third line, and we believe that we'll be able to get to that 38 per month as we get to the back half of the year.

The only thing I would add, Doug, is the third line, it also helps us with unforeseen issues because it gives us flexibility across three lines as opposed to having to close two if we end up with a nonconformance somewhere. So we are simply trying to overcapacitize to accommodate the things that appear and study our production. Okay, very good. Thank you.

Yep. Thank you. Our next question is from Peter Alman from Bayard. Please go ahead.

Yes, good morning, Dave and Brian. Hey, Dave, thanks for calling out some of the KPIs that you were talking about. Obviously, they're all super important. You said you're getting some real-time insights on some of these metrics. Maybe, you know, is there any color you can give us on what you're seeing so far on the progress, whether it's, you know, the notice of escapes or shortages or, you know, you talked about employee proficiency? Just trying to get at, you know, ultimately what the metrics that – is there anything that's a long pole in the tent that is holding back for rate increases and just the confidence around, you know, getting to that rate 38? Thanks.

Peter, thanks. Every metric gets better when you slow things down. So, yeah, I don't want to kid anybody. The step we took to slow things down, it was very deliberate, very straightforward, and every metric benefits from that moment. So we've had a step change, improvement, traveled work, of course, being the big one. And the way to measure traveled work, in my view, I think the view of our production team is when we get a clean fuselage and we move it through, you know, less than half the flow time it would have taken in its prior state. That reduces everything. And the reason is you don't have traveled work, you don't have defects moving down the line, you don't have any of that stuff. So we've been a beneficiary of a step change on that front. And we're now at the stage where we're only getting clean fuselages. Whereas, you know, in the first two quarters, we were managing a mix of the prior regime and what we're getting now. So, anyway, that's the big proxy for the way things are going to move forward and are moving forward. You'll know when we get out of kilt on any one of those metrics. I don't think any of them are going to stop us from the plans that we've announced and our expectations as we approach year end. probably the one we'll all just keep our eye on is the traveled work scenario where we cannot allow ourselves to uh to get back into a scenario where we're traveling things too far down the line and we've got a lot of controls in place so that that won't happen appreciate it thanks dave yep thank you our next question is from sheila kayalu from jeffries please go ahead thank you guys and good morning dave and brian

Brian, this one's for you. Maybe if we could just think about what's the buffer on free cash flow and the cash balance? How do we think about tapping that RC if cash falls below $10 billion, which is what you're suggesting in Q3? And do we think about Q4 as cash usage or generation? And what's the cadence of inventories and advances maybe over the next two to four quarters, if you can?

Yeah, so sure. Thanks, Sheila, for the question. So the working capital drag has been pretty meaningful in the first and second quarter, and it's the inventory as well as the advances as deliveries have been lower. Now, the third quarter is going to be a similar working capital drag as it was in the first and second quarter. Inventory will still be a headwind, albeit a smaller one, and the advances timing will be an additional headwind, which again, that will gradually improve over time with deliveries. And we're seeing that customers are applying excess advances and lowering advance payments as they want to see delivery performance improve. So we've just got to deal with that timing because once the factory moves and we start delivering, all of that will unwind on both the advances and the inventory. But it is going to take us time to do that. Now, in the third quarter, deliveries will be better, but we still have these word capital headwinds. In the fourth quarter, we're going to have stronger deliveries. We're going to have real world capital improvement. And I'd also mention that we're going to have a tanker lot 11 that we expect. So these cash flows can move fairly meaningful quarter to quarter, and it's all predicated on our ability to deliver and get the factory stable and getting it improved. So that's the way we're thinking about the back half on cash.

What's the cash balance you feel comfortable with?

You know, we've always said 10, but at any given moment, if that kind of moves a little bit, given what's in front of us, we can be comfortable. I think there's a broader question around we're constantly looking at liquidity. You saw that with what we did in May. You saw that in how we treated the Spirit transaction. So right now, we're comfortable with where we're at and how we get to the end of the year.

Thank you. Thank you. The next question is from Maya Walton from Wolf Research. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. Maybe to follow up briefly on that, Brian, can you comment on the abnormality of those advance payments? You mentioned some are applying previous prepayments to the current profile and some are basically deferring their payments until they see better performance. Can you categorize where you are on advances? Have you overcollected in the past and therefore we're in a divot? Are you undercollecting now and there'll be a you know, an actual beneficial recovery, if you will, at some point in the near term?

Both. Let me answer your question. You know, we do have the excesses that people are applying, as well as people are withholding the PDPs until they get that delivery structure, delivery schedule more stable. So it's both. I mean, you saw in the quarter that we had a pullback of about a billion dollars on the advance balance. Those two things are both happening in that balance, and we expect that in the second half to continue. But when we start to deliver with predictability, all that will begin to unwind. So this really is timing. And if timing over quarters is our best guess, and it's all, again, predicated on our ability to get deliveries in a different position.

And the overarching – Opportunity for us is still the shortage of airplanes and the demand scenario. So this isn't a soft spot in the market where people are trying to sort of get something, create a fundamental change. This is short-term management, which we all understand and we're trying to accommodate. But the demand is still so strong for airplanes that that provides the incentive for everybody to want to get us money so they can get their planes.

And on advances on 777X to offset that $800 million quarter inventory growth, is that a material offset to the 800, or is the 800 more or less the net 777X performance that we're seeing?

Yeah, the 800 is really the inventory specifically. The advance was not meaningful at this moment. It's the inventory that is the real one that we're dealing with, which, again, is the investment in the entry to service.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you. The next question is from David Strauss from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Maureen, thanks for taking the question. Brian, I know it's difficult to put a fine point on the cash burn, but, you know, I guess for the full year, are you looking at a number closer to a $5 billion burn or a $10 billion burn? That's the first question. And then, you know, you've obviously said you're prioritizing your investment grade rating. To the extent that you need more funding, do you expect the rating agencies to allow you to issue debt again and keep IG? Or, you know, are you potentially thinking about, you know, having to do an equity offering? Thank you.

Yeah, I'm just not smart enough right at this moment to say whether it's five or 10. As you know, as we ramp up, deliveries, it's pretty meaningful movement in our cash balance. So I'm going to steer away from trying to get more specific. It will be a usage and we're working our way through it. And as we work through the timing elements, we know that as we move forward, that's going to go in the right direction. In terms of the question around rating agencies, you know, we are in regular conversations with all three rating agencies. They, like us, are all focused on the operating performance of the company, on our ability to generate free cashflow, and the absolute debt reduction. And we tell them what we consistently said to everyone. The investment grade is the number one priority, and as we regularly monitor our liquidity, if we are ever to bump up against maturities, we're to do what it takes to protect that rating, period. And we've been consistent since, April 2020 on that front, and evidenced by the spirit of financing decisions. So we stay ready, we stay agile. That rating is the priority.

Thanks very much.

The next question is from Jason Gursky with Seager. Please go ahead.

Yeah, good morning, everyone. I just want to go back to the 777 for a minute. And Brian Moody asked you to talk a little bit about the expected, you know, future burn on that program from a cash flow perspective in the quarters leading up to certification and initial delivery. And then, I know a lot of that's being driven by inventory, of course. Maybe as well talk about what the inventory burn looks like on the back side of that and kind of what you are expecting at this point from, you know, production when we get out in that 25, 26 timeframe and kind of what you're thinking on deliveries out in that 26 timeframe given the backlog assuming that you get the certification done there in 2025 and first deliveries get started. Thanks.

Well, the good news on the last part of the question is the backlog is pretty robust, and we just had some terrific performance at the air show on the widebody front. I would say, in general, the 777X cash is going to look similar to all the other development programs. You know, we used cash prior to the entry in service. You've seen that. I talked about the $800 million this quarter. That's been consistent, and that is all driven by the natural inventory build as we prepare for that entry in service. Now, we also know that it will turn positive about a year after EIS as deliveries begin to ramp. And that will play out in a very normal way that most development programs play out. And, yes, it's going to be underwritten by that robust backlog that we have a high confidence in, and the customers love the airplane. So we feel pretty good, and these are just investments in timing. And over the long term, it's going to be a great payoff.

thank you and our next question is from christine lee wong from morgan's family please go ahead hey uh dave bryan um on the iam labor negotiations um can you provide an update on where you are how far apart are you and the union and economics and what operating contingencies are in place in case the union were to go on strike thanks well we're definitely not planning on a strike uh just for starters uh

I can't really – it's too early to call out a gap analysis with respect to the puts and takes because we're too early in the process. And, you know, I like the framework. I like the investments that we want to make with respect to training and development of people. We know that asks will be big. We know wage asks will be big. We're not afraid to treat our employees well in this process. So we're just going to work as hard as we can not to have a strike. And anyway, this will be in Kelly and Stephanie's, you know, backyard by the time we get to that negotiation. But as you know, as well as I do, until the last week is in play, you don't know much. So I'll just leave it at that and try not to predict. Other than to tell you we have an express intent to not have to strike.

Great. Thank you.

And thank you. The next question is from Kaivan Rumer from TD Cohen. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks so much. So, production in July looked like it remained pretty depressed. In August, you basically have vacations. How should we think about the recovery in terms of production and deliveries? Because it looks like August isn't that great. And sort of related, a number of your suppliers, you know, who are going at higher rates than you are producing are talking about, you know, they're keeping some inventory there because you don't pull it yet. And they're asking you for advances. So, what are you having to do with your suppliers in terms of giving them a lifeline of some advances so that they can continue to produce, won't have to cut back and then ramp up later. So yeah, so maybe talk about those two issues.

So in terms of your question around the 737 rate ramps, keep in mind, beginning part of this year, we were very, very low production, like single digits. And now we're getting to the point in June, July, where we're kind of mid-20s. And, you know, August will likely be an improvement ahead of that. But then we're going to have a nice steady ramp through the back half the year, again, predicated on a successful Line 3 being brought to bear and also the China resumption. So everything we see, we've got the labor, we've got the inventory, We've got the fuselages. It's all lined up for us to continue to improve our delivery ramp, and that's on us to go execute it. So we feel good about the progress we've made, and we've got proof points that says we've got a real ability to hit our 38 per month as we exit the year. In terms of the discussion about the supply chain, they're all unique. It's one by one. We're very careful to make sure that The way we're trying to protect stability in our own factory, we're trying to protect stability across the supply chain. And we do make certain moves here and there. Probably Spirit's the best example. And we have to do that so that when we move through the course of this year and going forward, we do it in a very stable, predictable way with a supply chain that's right there with us. Nothing that we see gives us any pause or concern. We've got all the assets and resources. We just have to start working our way through and delivering these airplanes for our customers.

But so collectively, if you add all of your advances to suppliers, have those peaked or are they continuing to move up?

You know, there's not really a material change, Kai. You know, here and there, there might be some differences, but nothing material and nothing that's not contemplated in our forward look.

Thank you very much.

And our next question is from Seth Seichman from JP Morgan. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks very much and good morning. Wanted to ask on SPIRIT, which you mentioned on the last question, when you think about their ability to fund themselves through the close of this transaction in mid-2025, is that, you know, are you contemplating having to take any additional action to fund SPIRIT through close? And then secondly, when you think about the investment plan for Boeing into Spirit, once Spirit is part of Boeing, you know, what can you tell us qualitatively or quantitatively to characterize that investment plan to prepare Spirit for the rate ramp ahead?

So I'll be careful not to speak for Spirit too much. On the other hand, they're performing well. We expect them to continue to perform well. And we've got confidence that we're going to get clean fuselages that helps coincide with our delivery schedule. So we feel pretty good about where they sit and their continued performance. So nothing there gives us any concern at the moment. And in terms of investing, we look forward to closing this acquisition. We look forward towards bringing them into the Boeing world. And, you know, we will not be shy or bashful with any investments that are needed in order for long-term stability. We feel really good about what is in front of us on that front, and we can't wait to close.

Great. Thanks very much.

Thank you. Our next question is from Noah Papanek from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, everyone.

Good morning, Noah.

Can you talk a little bit more about the leadership decisions that you've made? I know Kelly has had a lot of experience in the industry, but kind of out of an operating role for a bit, what's the potential for wanting to hit the reset button on a lot of the transitions you're in the middle of right now versus ability to hit the ground running? And how should we think about Pat, Stephanie, other roles as you move forward here?

Well, I'll take a crack, and I'm not going to – You know, divulge anything that I that I'm not. Perfectly aware of. The board made this decision. Over the last nine months. When I think about the number of people they've called around the industry at the supply side, the buy side, the regulatory side. Pretty remarkable thorough discussions. And at the end of the day, a couple of names surface and they landed on Kelly and I I could not be happier with the call because I know Kelly I've been around Kelly. He's a seasoned operator. He's got experience. He knows what we do for a living. And it'll bring that experience immediately to bear. So I wasn't really in the decision making process. So I don't want to I don't want to kid you about that. On the other hand, where it ended up is, in my view, a very, very strong place. And then with respect to Kelly, Kelly was quite informed about everything going on at Boeing, leadership team, et cetera. And anyway, I don't think he's coming in with a notion to want to change a lot of folks. And my guess is he's going to put his arms around Stephanie and the rest of the team in a big way and just try to support their work. He knows full well that we're in a recovery mode, and he knows full well we've got to complete the recovery mode, and we've got to get this stable and move forward. So that's me talking, and anyway, I don't think Brian's going to add much to this, but I don't think this is intended to be a large leadership overhaul.

Okay. Brian, just a quick one. Do you have a number, whether billions of dollars or a number of airplanes that How much inventory you hold that's specifically from having the supply chain stay ahead of you?

You know, there's not a number that we disclose. It's not immaterial. The good news is that you see it right there in the cash flow statements in total. That's a big driver, and the good news is that this is timing. This will unwind as we deliver airplanes for our customers, which we look forward to being able to do more predictably.

Okay, thank you. Lois, we have time for one final question.

Thank you. And that will come from Ken Herbert from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Dave and Brian. Thanks for squeezing me in. I just wondered, Dave, maybe if you can provide a little bit more color on certification timing on the 7 and the 10. I know it's now 25. You're confident in the de-icing certification, but can you give any more granularity on how we think about that timing and some of the next milestones for those two particular variants on the MAX?

Well, really, the milestone is to complete the engineering work and make sure that it passes the certification tests, etc. And it literally is that one discrete item that is the choke point. But high level of confidence that we're going to complete that and probably complete the engineering well before the end of the year, then we've got to get through the test certification work and then we're off. I don't Think there are any other sort of issues that we have to contend with other than to get that done and prove it out.

So first half 25 sounds realistic.

Sounds realistic to me. But they're in charge.

All right, Lois, everybody that concludes our call. Thank you for joining.

Thank you. That concludes the call. Thank you for joining the Boeing Company Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call.