ONE Gas, Inc.

Good day, everyone. One guest, second quarter earnings conference call and webcast will begin shortly. Good day and welcome to the OneGas second quarter earnings conference call and webcast. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Erin Dailey. Please go ahead, Ms. Dailey.

Thank you, Dennis. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on our second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. This call is being webcast live, and a replay will be available later today. After our prepared remarks, we're happy to take your questions. A reminder that statements made during this call that might include one-gap expectations or predictions should be considered forward-looking statements and are covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Securities Act of 1933, and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statement. For discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ, please refer to our SEC filings. This call will include financial results and guidance with respect to adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share, which are non-GAAP financial measures as defined by the SEC. A reconciliation of the company's GAAP net income and GAAP earnings per share to adjusted net income and adjusted net income per share, along with additional disclosures required by Regulation G, are available in the earnings relief that we issued yesterday. Joining us this morning are Sid McAnally, Chief Executive Officer, Chris Signolfi, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Curtis Dinan, President and Chief Operating Officer. And now I'll turn the call over to Sid.

Thanks, Erin, and good morning, everyone. Our strong second quarter performance reflects solid execution across the business and the continued strength of our growth strategy, supported by constructive jurisdictions. Adjusted EPS was 82 cents for the quarter, compared to 54 cents in the same period last year. Through the first half of the year, we've grown adjusted EPS by 16 percent over last year, despite weather that was 25 percent warmer. We delivered these results while keeping the average customer bill flat year over year and increasing our dividend. This balanced approach to operating a 100% regulated company is intentional. Our strategy is to strengthen our delivery system and grow the business through disciplined investment while keeping our long-term customer bill growth in line with inflation. Combined with the legislative and regulatory framework that supports investment and economic development, We're able to deliver growth that is both durable and sustainable. The opportunity to serve large load customers continues to broaden across our service territory. Rising demand is being driven by ongoing electric load growth and the need for reliable, dispatchable energy. Interest from gas-fired generation, data centers, and advanced manufacturing has grown meaningfully creating additional avenues for sustainable long-term growth. We expect the factors driving our strong performance in the first half of this year to continue, and we now expect to achieve adjusted earnings within the upper half of our 2026 guidance range. We're confident in our outlook, which is supported by new rates taking effect and continued customer growth. along with ongoing benefits from constructive legislative developments in Kansas and Texas. Now I'll turn it over to Chris to discuss the details of our financial performance and regulatory activities.

Chris? Thanks, Sid, and good morning, everyone. Adjusted net income for the second quarter was $52.1 million, or 82 cents per diluted share, compared with $32.7 million, or 54 cents in the same period last year, a 52% increase. On a GAAP basis, EPS was 74 cents compared with 53 cents last year, a nearly 40% increase. These results were supported by approximately $16 million of new revenue from new rates and greater than anticipated benefits from Texas House Bill 4384. As we have discussed previously, the Texas House Bill supports economic development by allowing natural gas utilities to defer depreciation expense and ad valorem taxes and accrue a carrying cost on capital expenditures between the time of project in service and its inclusion in rates. The impact will fluctuate by quarter based on the timing and amount of eligible capital placed into service. Given the cadence of our annual GRIP filing, We generally expect the second quarter to represent a larger share of the annual benefit with a smaller contribution in the third quarter. This timing reflects how eligible investments are accrued before the annual GRIP filing takes effect. Once the filing is reflected in customer rates, the amount recognized through accruals declines in the third quarter before building again. With first half 2026 results complete, We now expect House Bill 4384 to contribute approximately 42 cents to full year adjusted EPS. This expectation, along with new rates and ongoing cost discipline, gives us confidence in raising our financial expectations for the full year. As I noted on our last quarter call, the warm winter weather created some positive offsets, which we expected to see play out later in the year. and that has proven true. We consumed less gas for storage this winter than we would have under normal conditions, finishing the first quarter with inventory levels about 25% higher than we had planned. Higher spring storage balances mean we have less to inject this refill season, creating the opportunity for capacity release in Kansas, the revenues from which we share 50-50 with customers. Net to our interest We recognized about $900,000 in related revenue during the second quarter and have realized the total of $2.8 million in capacity release revenues year to date. We believe an incremental $1.2 million in capacity release opportunities remain through the injection season. Second quarter O&M expenses increased approximately 6.6% year over year, moderating from the first quarter increase. line locating tickets, largely related to fiber installation activity, remain elevated, reflecting continued construction and economic activity across our service territories. We have also experienced increased fuel costs from our fleet due to geopolitical unrest. We are not changing our 3 to 4 percent long-term guidance for annual O&M increases, however, and expect the sequential growth in overall O&M expenses to move meaningfully lower over the back half of this year. Excluding amounts related to KGSS1, second quarter interest expense decreased by $3.8 million compared with the prior year due in part to lower commercial paper rates. Turning to equity, we have forward sale agreements in place which total approximately $41.5 million. roughly half our need for this year. We will continue to be opportunistic about issuing equity as we meet our remaining needs, which, given our trading liquidity, can easily be funded through our ATM program. Yesterday, the One Gas Board of Directors declared a dividend of 68 cents per share, unchanged from the previous quarter. Our financial guidance for the year remains adjusted net income of $306 million to $314 million and adjusted EPS of $4.83 to $4.95. But with strong first half performance and the impact of the Texas legislation, we expect to achieve adjusted earnings within the upper half of these ranges, or $310 million to $314 million and $4.89 to $4.95. Now I'll turn to regulatory activities. Oklahoma Natural Gas filed its annual performance-based rate change application in February, seeking a $28.7 million rate increase. At the hearing in June, the administrative law judge recommended approval of the application as filed. Interim rates subject to refund were implemented in late June. Texas Gas Service made its gas reliability infrastructure program filing in March, requesting a $36.9 million revenue increase. In June, the Texas Railroad Commission approved the requested increase, and new rates became effective in July. This was our first statewide GRIP filing, and the first to reflect the expanded benefits of Texas House Bill 4384. Kansas Gas Service filed an application under the gas reliability surcharge statute in July, seeking an approximately $14.3 million increase, with rates expected to take effect in October. The filing reflects the expanded recovery provisions under House Bill 2435, which broadened eligible investments to all direct capital investments in Kansas, increased the maximum residential monthly surcharge to $1.35 from 80 cents, and shorten the review period to 90 days from 120 days. We do not have any full rate cases planned until we file the Oklahoma rate case in 2027 as required by Terra. And now, Curtis, I'll turn things to you.

Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with an update on growth and capital deployment. We completed $188 million worth of capital projects this quarter, Relatively in line with the same period last year. Growth across our service territory remains broad-based. Through July, we installed 11,000 new meters led by Oklahoma City and El Paso. Beyond this ongoing residential growth, we are advancing large load opportunities and currently have three high-volume projects under contract. Together they represent roughly $15 million of incremental annual revenue and $175 million of associated capital within service dates spanning the second half of 2026 through 2028. One of these projects is the Western Farmers Gas Fire Generation Project, which was announced late last year. We are preparing to bid the construction contract and expect to begin installation early in 2027. The project remains on track for a Q3 2028 end service date. It includes the construction of a 43-mile, 24-inch pipeline in southern Oklahoma. The other two contracted projects are already in construction or commissioning. One of the projects is in El Paso to serve an advanced manufacturing facility, and the other will serve a data center in Oklahoma. Both are expected to be placed in service this quarter. On our last earnings call, we noted six additional projects in late-stage discussions that, in aggregate, could support approximately three gigawatts of generation and up to one BCF per day of demand across Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. One of those six projects is the Oklahoma Data Center that I just mentioned. which is now not only under contract but expected to be in service this quarter. This project highlights one of our strategies in pursuing large load opportunities. By leveraging our existing pipeline network, we can respond quickly to meet customer needs and create value for all customers. The remaining five projects are in late stage discussions and project scoping and represent our highest conviction prospects. We have 17 additional opportunities in early stages of evaluation and will provide updates as the projects advance. Turning to O&M, our coworkers continue to drive improvements in workforce efficiency and safety. Second quarter line locating activity increased approximately 7% year-over-year, while damages declined 6%. This highlights the operational benefits of bringing certain work in-house. In addition to the insourcing progress on our line locating function, we have also insourced 40% of the watch and protect function in Oklahoma and are on track to have that fully insourced by year-end. This initiative further demonstrates our focus on operational excellence by enhancing safety and system integrity while driving more effective management of O&M expenses. And now I'll turn it back over to Sid for closing remarks.

Thanks, Curtis. We operate in a region that continues to experience residential growth driven by economic development. Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas have business-friendly policies and regulatory frameworks that attract investment and support growth. Our states also enjoy abundant natural gas resources. and extensive infrastructure, creating an attractive environment for large load customers. We are well positioned to serve this growing demand, driving sustainable growth and shareholder value, all while maintaining our commitment to safety and affordability. Our performance over the first half of the year reflects the strength of our strategy, the quality of our execution, and our ability to capitalize on the opportunities before us. The disciplined focus of our coworkers and their commitment to safety and operational excellence continues to drive our success. I want to thank each of them for their contributions and dedication to serving our customers and our communities. As we look forward, we continue to see a clear runway for growth and remain focused on serving our customers while generating attractive returns for our investors. With that, we'll open the call for questions.

Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star 1 on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. Again, press star 1 to ask a question. We will pause for a moment to allow everyone an opportunity to signal for questions. And your first question is from the line of Constantine Ledniv with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. It's actually Alex on for Constantine. Thanks for taking our questions. Just in terms of the capital allocation strategy on a go-forward basis with some of the improved regulatory constructs you've highlighted, do you see maybe a capex shift or pull forward of capital into better constructs with less ROE lag? And maybe just to frame that, Would you provide sort of a creative opportunity within your current five to seven longer term?

Alex, this is Curtis, and let me just talk first a little bit about how we think about capital in general. So the first thing our capital focuses on is our system integrity spending, and that typically represents about 60 to 70 percent of our capital budget. That is agnostic to regulatory treatment in any of our jurisdictions. That's purely driven by the needs of our system and the replacements we need to make. In terms of allocating other capital, our growth capital, that's driven mostly by what customer needs are and where those growth opportunities are taking place. We're seeing that in all three of our states and across the different types of projects that I mentioned in my comments and Sid also mentioned in his. whether that's utility scale generation, it's advanced manufacturing, or it's data center opportunities. Again, that exists in all three states. We're seeing a little bit higher level of activity with customers in the state of Texas, which as your question suggests, that's beneficial to us because of the legislation that we talked about earlier. So where there is the opportunity, where the greater opportunities are in Texas, that again is driven a lot by what the customer needs are and being able to respond to what's in the marketplace.

Alex, to your second question, you can expect us to continue to be very open-handed in the reports that we offer the street relative to the capital projects in front of us. have a great deal of confidence in our execution going through the remainder of this year, but we don't see limitations in the years to come. Your question about our five to seven, we offered that guidance in December of 2025, and we will continue to execute this plan and look forward to the opportunity. to speak to the investment community about 2027 later this year.

Got it. That makes sense. And then just touching on the dividend policy, it's been credit supportive. So does the current policy of 1% to 2% growth still make sense with the improving cash flow metrics? And where do you want to be over the longer term relative to your peers? Thanks.

Alex, this is Chris. That is a board decision. It's a discussion with them on a quarterly basis. But the five-year plan that we communicated last December, the same plan Sid just referenced, did contemplate a 1% to 2% growth rate in the dividend annually through the duration of that plan, so through 2030. We think about it in a cash flow modeled basis. And 100% regulated company as we are, where we have actual capital structure, in our rate designs in all three states. We believe the best return on investment and the fastest earnings per share growth rates can be achieved as we self-fund a greater percentage of our capital investments. And so the strategy around the dividend, the deceleration in dividend growth, which we put in place three years ago, was really driven to pivot our funding structure to be more self-funded. from an equity perspective. You've seen the payout ratio fall from 68% a couple of years ago to an implied 57% on a gap basis this year. That will continue to moderate as our plan runs through. And the point of liftoff in terms of when are we satisfied that we have internally funded the growth strategy of the business and when can elevated levels of dividend growth That's going to be an active conversation as we come into the planning process this fall.

Great.

I'll leave it there. Thank you. Thanks for your questions, Alex.

Our next question is from the line of Richard Sunderland with Truist Securities. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning and thank you for the time today. I wanted to go back to the start of the script and that opportunity around the large load customers. You talked about interest across a number of avenues and growth there. Is that reflective of kind of new inbounds you are seeing across generation data centers, advanced manufacturing, or is this You know, a continued trend that you've been speaking to for several quarters now. Just trying to get a sense of the customer side and maybe how that feeds into the 17 projects in other stages of evaluation also offered in the script.

Hey, Richard. This is Curtis. And these are normally kind of longer lead type of developments. So these are customers that we've been working with for a period of time. developing the projects trying to understand what their needs are and as they go through their investment decision process where they're supporting them to think about options and how to how to approach the different opportunities. There are other projects in that mix of 17 that have come up much more quickly have gone very quick to we know that there's limited capacity in this area and we want to secure that supply as we continue to finalize our their investment decisions. So it's a mix of those and again that's across all three states and each of those different types of categories that I was describing earlier. We continue to make progress on them and as I said in my comments we'll share more once additional projects reach final investment decisions and they're under contract with us.

Understood, that's helpful there. Thanks for running through that. And then just on the numbers themselves, and I guess some of the O&M commentary in particular, you spoke to 1H versus 2H dynamics. Could you push that a little bit more in terms of the O&M trajectory on a 2H basis that you're expecting? And is there any kind of knock-on effects into 27 on how you're staging some of that activity this year versus next year?

Rich, let me offer just a little bit of context and then ask Chris to go into detail in responding to your question. We started some years ago looking at the opportunities that we had to insource certain work, and as we piloted those programs, we realized that not only could we match or beat the cost that we were experiencing externally, We saw a significant step up in the quality of the work that was being done. So over the last few years, we've been fairly aggressive in insourcing and line locating, and we're coming to a point in that project where we're finding the balance that we saw a few years ago when we started. As Curtis said, we've shifted that over now to watch and protect. That's where we send folks out to watch our system when we know that there's construction around critical areas of the system and we're seeing the same level of performance there. So as we signal both in our first quarter call and in this call, we knew that we would see escalated O&M related in part to increased insourcing and we continue to recognize the efficiencies of that as we go through the remainder of the year. So the shape of O&M through the year is something that we've attempted to signal all along and we continue to be committed to the fact that we're going to see a pretty significant reduction in the second half. Chris?

Yeah. Hey, Rich. How are you? To follow on from Sid's comment, I mentioned in the prepared remarks that we expected, as you look at a sequential growth in O&M from the prior period to the current period, to see a meaningful step down in the back half. 8 plus percent in the first quarter and 6% and change in the second quarter. Your expectation should be meaningfully below that in the third and fourth quarters. There are external factors. Curtis mentioned line locate activity up 7% year over year. So there's a lot of economic growth going on in our territories. That's a cost that we bear that we have to respond to to locate our assets on behalf of others who are digging. I mentioned in my prepared remarks fuel costs. We're paying close attention to what refined product inventories look like and the dynamics associated with that. We travel about 10 million miles a quarter in company-owned vehicles. So you think about the $9-ish million of additional O&M expense this quarter versus last year in the second quarter. About 15% of that was fuel, elevated fuel year over year. So we've baked all of that in. to the expectations that I'm offering you. As you think about a cascade in the future, we talked about a 3% to 4% long-term O&M growth rate. So as you think about it, it will cascade to lower levels of annual O&M growth in future periods. Some of that is driven by the benefits of the insourcing effort that Curtis has noted, primarily line locating, but now watch and protect. And they continue to explore other functions that are worthwhile for insourcing.

Thank you for running through all of that and thanks for the time.

You bet, Rich. Thanks for the question.

Your next question is from the line of Julian Dumoulin-Smith with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Nicely done on the quarter. This is Luke Fincker on for Julian. I just wanted to ask if you could quantify the benefits from HB 4384 this quarter and how that showed up across DNA and interest expense. and if not, maybe color on how we should think about cadence for the rest of the year after the July grip reset would be helpful. Thanks.

Hey Luke, this is Chris. I don't have it for the quarter. If you thought about it maybe in the first half of the year across both the elements included in GAAP and then the non-GAAP adjustment which reflects the equity return, it's about 28, 29 cents. As you think about the back half, one thing to note is The benefits, the accrual benefits, I spoke about this in my prepared commentary, is driven by capital in service in Texas. So a reminder, the largest project that we've completed as a company was the Austin System Reinforcement Project, which was in Austin, as the name implies, and was placed into service in the third quarter of last year. So the first full quarter for which this legislative benefit was available Our largest project took effect. We don't have projects in Texas of that caliber planned for the back half of this year. And so as you think about sequentially back half last year to back half this year, I would just note to you that we had a very large project take effect in the third quarter that we don't see this year. I did note a 42% full year impact anticipated given what we now know from first half performance.

Got it. Yeah, that helps. And then maybe, you know, you previously discussed evaluating low cost rate protection, including a SOFR collar for commercial paper. Can you update us on where the evaluation stands and whether you expect to put any head structures in place this year, just given expectations with rising rates? Thanks.

Yeah, thanks, Luke. We did explore that. You're right to raise it. And we are not of the mind to pursue it at the moment. It's something that's available to us. But as we thought about the cost of that structure and some of the complexities around it, mainly some of the volatility that it may introduce to our earnings reports on a quarterly basis, we didn't feel like it presented the value that we maybe initially thought it might. In addition, as we thought about the voting members of the FOMC. And yes, the markets focus a lot on is the next move a 25 basis point hike or how many hikes might we have through the balance of the year. The expectations were for three rate cuts at the beginning of the year and now the market expectation is for two rate hikes. But if you watch the dot plot and think about where each of the FOMC voting members is positioned for future expectations, They all see a lower Fed funds rate as you scroll out through 27 into 28 and 29. They all represent the current level of Fed funds rate as restrictive relative to a broadly 3% neutral rate. And so with all of those factors, it's not something that we have decided to take action on today, but it still represents an option to us.

Got it. Makes total sense. Thanks so much, Chris. I'll leave it there.

Your next question is from the line of David Arcaro with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi, this is Amanda on for Dave. Thanks so much for taking our questions. Maybe just on the expectation raise, anything that you could speak to in terms of specific aspects that give you confidence to land in that upper half? I know, Chris, you mentioned the Texas House Bill contribution. Just wondering if there are any other specific moving pieces that you would point to for the raise.

Hi, Amanda. Well, that's one of them. Another is some of the solidification of some of the projects that Curtis mentioned. I mean, he mentioned one that had moved from sort of prospect to in-service this quarter. That will start contributing in a way that we were not totally certain about before. And then, as I talked about, O&M and a real focus internally coming off the winter. We had spent some time on last quarter's call about levers we thought were available to us that could help us moderate from a cost standpoint and overcome some of the margin hit that we took in the first quarter with the weakness in the weather dynamics. As we walk through that with teams throughout the company, we have a greater level of competence and cost discipline to the back half of the year.

And Amanda, this is Sid. I'd just add that The capacity release program has been a real success and credit to our gas supply team for the way that they've taken advantage of what was excess supply coming out of a relatively warm winter with the exception of one significant storm. I also want to point back to a question in Chris's comment. When you think about the way that these projects come into service, They come in in a way that we have some visibility around but not perfect visibility around. But the funnel that Curtis speaks to is one that will allow us to have ongoing projects. And so we do have forward visibility into what the marketplace looks like in terms of projects and the probability of those projects. We've been very intentional in building a funnel that allows us to evaluate opportunities and to take advantage of those that we think are beneficial not only to our investors but also to our customers in the way that they are positively impacted by some of the projects that we've already talked about and projects that we're working for the future. So the Austin System Reinforcement Project came online last year and there are other projects of scale in addition to Western Farmers. They're just, to Curtis's point, not to the point that we want to talk about them publicly because we don't talk about projects publicly until we have contracts in place and a high level of certainty.

Great. Thanks so much for the color. To the extent that you can, maybe just to follow up on that in terms of maybe like timing of those large load opportunities between generation data centers and manufacturing, I guess You pulled one of the projects forward, but kind of what does that look like for the remaining five projects in late stage and the 17 in the early stage?

I think I made the comment on the first call, Amanda. This is Curtis. About the ones that we put in the late stage, we thought there was a decent probability that those would move into a contracted stage here in fiscal 26. And in fact, one of those did. We're still working on the other projects. and we could be in a position where they're signed and announced before the end of the year. If not, it would likely be in the first part of 2027. In terms of the other 17 that I mentioned, those are, again, a little bit earlier stages of evaluation, working with the customers to figure out exactly what their needs are and what their timing is going to be. And so that's really what will drive getting to a final point where we speak publicly about them specifically.

Okay, great. Thanks so much.

Thank you. Your next question is from the line of David Paz with Wolf Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Looking out to the back half of your plan, have the better results this year pushed you to the upper half of that five to seven, say like in 2029, 30 off your current 2025 base?

Yes, David, thank you for the question. As you heard in our prepared remarks, we were confident moving into the upper half of the range given performance in the first half, and we have a fairly high degree of confidence as we go into the first half and are engaged in our planning for 2027. So we look forward to coming back to you at the appropriate time with more insight into what 2027 looks like in the forward five-year guidance. Anything you'd add, Chris?

I think that's right. David, if you think about we've had some developments this year that we did not anticipate in the plan last year. The expansion of our GSRS mechanism in Kansas is one we've talked with you and others about. The conversion of some of the large load and I think some of the maturation of what exists in the funnel and continues to be added to the funnel is additive in a way different than we thought about, you know, nine months ago, 12 months ago. So those are supportive functions that I think you're wise to pay attention to.

Got it. And just following up, when you do give your update this fall, I believe, will you be, do you expect to rebase it off of a new year? Should we assume until 25, given 26 and 27 are, I don't know if you want to say abnormal, but they're not in that five to seven range?

No, you should expect from us a consistency where we would use as the base the current guidance at that time for 2026. That has been our practice since we separated from One Oak. And one of the things that you understand if you backtest is that if we achieve what we aim to achieve, which is the upper half of this range, and you look at where we started in 2014, You will see a compound annual growth rate of adjusted EPS that's north of 7%, yet we've never really guided that level. And so the consistent outperformance that we've generated has kind of gotten baked into the historical performance in a way that maybe doesn't get fully captured by the forward guidance. We ratchet forward every year, which means outperformance like this year or we outperformed last year and we outperformed in 24. sometimes gets overlooked by forward guidance in a way when you compare it to the peer set. I think they would just focus your attention on that.

All right, thank you. That concludes the question and answer session. I would now like to hand it back to the One Gas team for closing remarks.

Thank you again to everyone for your interest in One Gas. Our quiet period for the third quarter starts when we close our books in early October and extends until we release earnings on November 2nd. We'll provide details about the conference call at a later date. Have a great day.

This concludes the One Gas Second Quarter earnings conference call and webcast. You may now disconnect.