Napatech

Thank you for standing by and welcome to Navitek's first quarter 2026 interim management statement. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. And if you would like to withdraw your question, press the star one again. For operator assistance throughout the call, please press star zero. And finally, I would like to advise all participants that this call is being recorded. I'd now like to welcome Klaus Skogrup, CFO, to begin the conference. Klaus, over to you.

Good morning. I'm Klaus Skogrup, CFO of Navatech. I am pleased to welcome you all to Navatech's presentation for the first quarter of 2026. Joining me today is our CEO, Karthik Srinivasan. Our first quarter 2026 report was released earlier this morning on the Oslo Stock Exchange and is also available on the investor relations section of the Navitek website. For your information, a recording of this webcast will be available later today. There will be a question and answer session following the presentation. During and after these prepared remarks, you may submit your question via text on the webcast page or we can take your questions on the phone. If you would like to ask a question, please follow the instructions on this slide. Please note that this presentation contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ from those discussed in forward-looking statements. For further information on risk factors, please see company announcement and the slides prepared for this presentation. With that, over to you, Karthik.

Thank you, Claus. And hello, everyone. Let me start with a brief summary of the quarter. We saw continued strengthening in our financial performance and early signs of demand recovery in the core infrastructure market, supported by disciplined execution across the business. At the same time, we are seeing accelerating momentum in our design wind pipeline across both core and infrastructure. Importantly, this pipeline is increasingly progressing toward production. which we expect to translate into revenue over time. Finally, our product positioning remains highly differentiated. As AI workloads scale, the network has emerged as a critical bottleneck and our deterministic programmable architecture is well aligned with these evolving requirements. Overall, the quarter reflects improving fundamentals, building momentum, and a clear positioning for the next phase of growth. Turning into our financial performance for the quarter, we delivered revenue of 5.7 million, representing 69% year-over-year growth, primarily driven by our improved demand in our core infrastructure business. Gross margins remained strong at 70%, reflecting a favorable product mix and continued discipline in execution. We're also seeing improvement in revenue trends, indicating early signs of recovery in our core infrastructure markets. With all this, while our guidance for 2026 remains unchanged, we continue to focus on consistent execution and converting pipeline into revenue over the course of the year. Turning to business momentum. On the core infrastructure side, we saw solid activity in the quarter with five new design wins, continued pipeline expansion across verticals, and new customer engagements. We also converted a key design win in the financial infrastructure. This is a production-oriented engagement with a multi-year opportunity, and importantly, we view this as a repeatable use case across similar customers. I will go into a bit more detail on this space in my next slide. On the AI infrastructure side, we continue to make steady and tangible progress. Our technical deliverables are on track, and validation and testing activities are progressing as planned. At the same time, we are seeing continued collaboration as we advance overall solution readiness towards production. In parallel, our engagement with the tier one server OEM continues to progress with use cases defined, product deliverables aligned, and commercial discussions underway. Overall, we are seeing strong execution in core infrastructure alongside meaningful progress in AI as both areas contribute meaningfully to our growth trajectory. I'll now take a moment to highlight one of our core infrastructure verticals, financial trading networks. These are mission-critical, latency-sensitive environments where performance is defined not just by speed, but by consistency and determinism. Typical applications in this space include real-time market data capture and normalization, feed handling, trading signal generation, and order execution, where even microseconds of variation can impact outcomes. Our customers in this segment include global banks, hedge funds, proprietary trading firms, and exchanges, all operating highly performance sensitive infrastructure. In these environments, the network sits directly in the critical path and increasingly becomes the limiting factor for performance. This is where Napotex architecture is well aligned, enabling deterministic ultra low latency processing with high reliability. Importantly, this is a repeatable use case with deployments across leading financial institutions and clear expansion potential over time. Let me now turn to AI infrastructure and how Nappertech's role in this space is becoming increasingly critical. As AI workloads scale, performance is increasingly constrained by the network rather than compute. Moving data efficiently between AI compute, memory and storage has become a critical challenge. Importantly, we view this not as a linear or evolutionary shift, but as a more fundamental change in how compute, networking and memory interact, requiring a different architecture to scale efficiently, both from a performance and energy standpoint. traditional networking introduces variability, congestion, and CPU overhead, which limits overall system efficiency and utilization. What we enable is a fundamentally different approach, deterministic, programmable networking that sits directly in the data path. This allows for consistent low latency movement, improved utilization of compute resources, and more efficient scaling of AI workloads. In practical terms, this applies across applications such as distributed inference pipelines, data preprocessing, and storage access used by hyperscalers and enterprise AI deployments. Overall, we see this as a structural shift in the market where networking becomes a key lever for performance and efficiency and where our architecture is well aligned. Before I hand it over, just to summarize, we are seeing strengthening financial performance, solid momentum in our core infrastructure business, and continued progress in AI as we position for the next phase of growth. With that, I'll turn it over to Klaus to walk through the financials in more detail and provide an update on our outlook.

Thank you, Karthik. We entered the year with a strong revenue in Q1 of $5.7 million, up 69% compared to Q1 last year. And as Karthik mentioned, the performance reflects continued customer engagement across our core infrastructure segment solutions. Our gross margin in Q1 was 70% in line with last year. Our staff costs and other external costs in Q1 amounted to 44.5 million Danish kroner, down 9% compared to Q1 2025, mainly due to reduced costs of subcontractors and personnel during 2025 to balance costs to the revenues. In Q1, we capitalized 810,000 Danish kroner compared to 3.1 million Danish kroner in Q1 2025. You can also read that our EBITDA in Q1 2026 amounted to a negative amount of 18 million Danish kroner, which is an improvement of 11 million Danish kroner compared to Q1 last year. Free cash flow in Q1 was negative of 5.8 million Danish kroner, following the negative EBITDA, which was partly covered by an improvement in our working capital. We still have more than 120 million Danish kroner in available cash. While we still have focus on reducing inventory, we are increasingly also pre-ordering to make sure we can meet customer demand, especially now where we do see increased lead times for a range of components. The positive development in receivables was driven by customers paying their invoices from December 2025 during Q1 26. Networking capital at the end of Q1 was 73 million Danish kroner, a reduction of 8 million Danish kroner compared to Q4 25. Net cash flow from financing activities for Q1 was negative 23 million Danish kroner as we did not draw on our credit fatalities by the end of Q1. We continue to manage the business with a strong focus on cross-discipline and cash preservation. Our guidance for the full year 2026 is unchanged compared to our latest reporting as Karthik mentioned. so here we are guiding units to be sold to be expected between 8 700 and 10 700 we expect a revenue between 32 and 38 million dollars which corresponds to around 200 to 240 million Danish kroner ending in the middle of the range would be equal to a growth of more than 50 percent compared to 2025. Our gross margin interval is expected to end between 60 and 70, and we expect staff expenses and other external costs to end in the range of 170 to 180 million Danish kroner. Staff costs transferred to capitalized development costs are expected to be DKK 5 to 8 million in 2026. As we wrap up today's presentation, we would like to invite you to visit Navitek at one of these upcoming events, Our full year event plan is shown online at the link provided. And if you happen to be in one of these great cities during the coming period, we would love to meet you in person. With that, we are now ready for the Q&A. Operator, we are now ready to take the first question.

Thank you, Klaus. And as mentioned, we will now begin the Q&A session and we'll take questions first from the phones. A reminder, if you are listening by phone and would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. And to withdraw your question, press the star one again. When called upon to ask your questions, please use your device handset and ensure that you are not on mute. Again, that is star one to raise your hand and join the queue and we'll pause for a moment for any questions. And your first question comes from the line of Christopher Bjornsson of DNV Carnegie. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Can you just give some more color on how you are progressing both with the Tier 1 Server OEM and with the D-Matrix relationships on the Server OEM? perhaps a bit more flavor on where you are in terms of the steps towards commercialization and how you think about timing there. And then in general, most of them, especially on the matrix, whether you feel that the inventory that you added in the quarter is kind of sufficient to prep you for the ramp with the matrix or if we should see a proper increase in Q2.

Thank you, Christopher, for that question. So I'll kind of break this into two parts. One is on the AI inference customer. We are progressing from our technical deliverable standpoint as well as commercial deliverable standpoint on track. We remain convinced and excited about that opportunity. And again, the variable here is just the timing of this. to your question about are we changing our supply or planning in terms of how we want to fulfill it. We're sticking to what our guidance is there. We had already factored in orders coming in from them. And so there's no change to that plan as far as that AI infrastructure customer is concerned. And as far as the tier one server OEM, Christopher, that's progressing well on plan. We have alignment on the statement of work. We have alignment on the features, performance, cost, schedule, et cetera. So things are looking good there. Again, the same kind of response applies. We are delivering to our requirements. When that converts into some sort of meaningful thing remains to be seen. But we have some amount of orders in 2026 baked in from the tier one server OEM as well, which we are not changing right now.

All right, thank you. And a reminder, if you are on the phones, please press star one on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue, and we'll pause for any final questions. And you have a question from Anders Newsom, private investor. Please go ahead.

Yeah, hi, guys. Thank you for allowing me in. Just on the five design wins, could you perhaps give us a bit more flavor on those in terms of potential and also timeline? Are they impacting 26 by any means? And also on the recent design win within the financials, when do we expect to see it convert into the revenue that you have guided for? Is that in Q2 or in Q4? When is that going to happen?

Yeah, thank you for the question. The design momentum that we speak about, both of those are pertaining to the core infrastructure. The five new design wins that we had, each of them will track a different kind of path towards production. And some of these may actually impact 2026, but again, no change to our plan there. But these tend to be a bit drawn in how they convert from a design win into full production. It can be anywhere between six and nine months for an existing product, which is why the core infrastructure market is so lucrative for us. We do turnkey solutions in that space to an existing, well-known, robust customer base. On the other side of the key design win that we announced, on the financial side, we are expecting the first 1.5 million that we spoke about, that is expected within the next couple of months. So that will definitely hit our 2026 revenue and that's kind of part of our plan. And the rest of the opportunity will kind of extend into 27 and beyond there. So that's kind of how the timing of the financial institution revenue looks like.

Thank you. What was the financial design when baked into your original guidance?

Yeah, so the way this works is we do have a lot of proof of concept designs that we do on an annual basis. And at any given point, each one of these or a few of these can actually convert into a design win like this for us. So we run data analytics based on how we are engaging with these customers or segments, and we bake that into our assessment for 2026. So this was not

uh something that came as a complete surprise this is already baked in into what we were expecting perfect thank you very much and your next question is from the line of oyster and lot guard of abg please go ahead yes thank you good morning uh congrats on the strong growth in q1 so i guess this this kind of reflects the good good momentum in your traditional smarting business can you say kind of what kind of verticals what kind of use cases are you seeing strong growth and and and how you kind of expect kind of the traditional smart business to to move throughout the year should we anticipate kind of normal seasonality from here that it strengthens in the second half or is kind of some kind of a large one of contracts or something in q1 so we shouldn't kind of fully extrapolate that

Yeah, fantastic question. Thank you for asking that. So we do, there is a reason why we kind of place the definitions of our market segments as core infrastructure and AI infrastructure. Within the core infrastructure, which is where we are seeing early signs of kind of demand recovery, that breaks down for us into at least four big verticals. That is fintech, uh telco uh cyber security and network packet monitoring each one of those segments represents uh individual growth areas for us like we announced in the in the fintech space we converted a designman into revenue uh we but we also expect uh alongside the the cyber security packet monitoring and telco businesses uh are showing signs of early recovery as well so we're expecting that to play a part in our 2026 performance

Thank you very much. Can you say something in terms of new design wins in the AI infrastructure area? Are you working on many leads there? What are you seeing in that area in terms of new potential design wins?

Yeah, there is a lot of engagement there. That is actually the more fascinating place for how fast that space is evolving. One thing I can definitely tell you with a lot of confidence is the AI infrastructure is no longer a compute problem. It is an efficiency problem, which immediately translates to two components of the data center that come into question. One is networking and the other is memory. And you will see that that's why there is a lot of requirements, a lot of specifications, a lot of consortium being formed around what to do in the space of networking. Big hyperscalers are putting out specs, consortiums are putting out specs. And this is an exciting time for a company like Napotech because we are fundamentally based on programmable networking. Our architecture, our products are built to deliver to an evolving paradigm, which is what the AI infrastructure market is going through right now. So I am very confident and excited about this space. And there's a lot of activity that we are currently in. And I'll be the first one to come here and tell you as they convert into some sort of designments.

OK, thank you. Thank you very much. I'll move back to the back of the queue.

And this does conclude our Q&A session via the phone. I would like to hand back to management for any written questions and closing remarks.

Thank you and we do have some written questions here and I'll just see whether I can group them a little bit. So there's one here from Lars Knudsen. A few questions. What is your visibility on H2 AI orders? How will RAMP look like? And maybe we'll just start with that and then we'll take the rest of the question. And I think you spoke a little bit into it already Karthik.

Yeah, so the second half of our 2026 is going to be exciting as well because that's when we start seeing some of our AI infrastructure revenue start starting to materialize. I think we had mentioned that a good chunk of the 2026 revenue for us will still be based on core infrastructure. and uh and the ai infrastructure will probably be about 20 and that's kind of still the mix that we're expecting for 2026. and then regarding the tier 1 oem have you lost any opportunities Oh, no, actually, we have not. In fact, we are in a very favorable position within the tier one OEM. I remember using an expression the last time I was here called the hub and spoke model, which basically translates to we are very much engaged with the technology team, which is the hub. and then there is a few spokes that lead to the product teams. That model is still strong for us and we are excited about delivering what we are calling the next generation data reduction technology, which is extremely important in the AI infrastructure world. As you're loading in huge large language models, compression and deduplication becomes a very important aspect of how our data gets rolled out. And that's exactly the critical application or use case that we are delivering in this proof of concept.

And then maybe just jumping to Per-Ola or Ignis, who has a question here. How is the progress in proof of concept with the tier one? That's what you just explained. And when can we expect to be part of their sales and their server sales?

Yeah, so the conversion of these designs into revenue and productization, that's kind of the variable in play here. We do have some level of early orders baked into our 2026 revenue, like we discussed. But when that converts into material production and revenue, that remains to be seen.

Yeah. And then a follow up question for Lars Knudsen here. Are there other opportunities arising with other players within AI infrastructure?

Yes. So that was the engagement or the set of engagements that I've been talking about. We do have to the capability that we have as a company to deliver. We are being selective on how we engage because at the end of the day, we have to prioritize how we deliver and make sure that our deliverable is robust. But yes, there is a and set of engagements that we have on the AI infrastructure, which follows our design wind pipeline, four stage pipeline routine.

Thank you. Then there's a question here from Ola Mellingstadter. You write that first orders from AI infrastructure will come in H2. Could you be specific? How many dollars of your 26 guidance of US dollar 30 to 37 million assume AI infrastructure deliveries? And if it's two AI orders come in at zero, how does that change the full year picture?

Yeah, so our 2026 revenue profile will still be significantly biased towards the core infrastructure. I think the last time we were here, we said about 20% of that is going to be coming in from AI. That's what the numbers look like. And of course, if the edge to AI orders don't materialize, then that's what the impact is going to be.

Thank you. and let me just see whether there are other related to this i think there is in in earlier presentation this pair all of gymnasts in earlier presentation has been said just 20 of the forecast from b matrix is taken into navas for us for 26 is this still valid yeah so yeah so i think that uh observation of yours is still what we're tracking for point context Yeah, but I think the point here is that D-Matrix may have a higher forecast and then we have only taken 20% of that in. So I think the point is that currently our guidance that's based on our expectations of what orders are coming from D-Matrix. Right, right, correct. Yeah. Then there's one here from again, D-Matrix acquired GigaIO to build a complete rack scale system. How has that changed your role at D-Matrix? Are you still the scale-out NIC in the squad reference architecture, or is there a risk they switch to a different supplier as they build out their own stack?

Good question. And I'm sure a lot of people had the same thing. And so, Olav, I'm glad that you asked it. Our relationship with them remains as strong as ever. In fact, it's even getting stronger because of the requirements that are unfolding for us as they themselves are evolving in this landscape very rapidly. The requirements are coming in towards production and we've completed the first stage and we're already embarking on the next generation kind of engagement to see what that looks like. And of course, a lot of these questions are for the matrix to answer. but the the acquisition that they made of the giga io data center assets that definitely enables them to build more of a rack scale architecture of which we are the singularly the the component delivering scale out networking cool and then there's a question here from lisa via mu you your site commercial discussions underway on the tier one server oem design when

Does that mean that proof of concept has been achieved? We're currently in the qualification process.

Right. As part of the design and engagement that we are having with the tier one, starting commercial discussions typically indicates that there is activity across the three groups that make decisions at these kind of places. So we have alignment with the executives. We have alignment with product management and engineering. And now we are working on alignment with commercial. And once all of those move forward, that converts into product and then converts into revenue. So moving into the commercial stage or activating the commercial stage is a strong indication that things are making good progress towards production.

Yes. And then also from Lisa here, can you also give some color on expected revenue ramp up for the remainder of the year? given that Q1 was seasonally very strong?

Yeah, so there is definitely seasonality that we will still continue tracking throughout our 2026 revenue. Because our 2026 revenue is still heavily based on core infrastructure, the seasonality will mimic prior year's seasonality, not necessarily in the absolute dollars, but at least in direction. So you can expect some of that to be similar in 2026.

Yeah, and then a question here from Terry Jensen. Why is revenue for Q1 lower than revenue in Q4? And I think that was what you just explained, Karthik, also that we do see seasonality and usually Q1 is our weakest quarter, whereas Q4 is the strongest. And then there's a last question here from last question. What's the timeline from your order card from your order cards to have it in stock? Any limitations?

Yeah, so again, very good question across the overall supply chain management and planning there. So our demand planning cycle or at least process is no longer limited by demand. It's actually just what we have to how we manage our supply. The lead times across critical components that we put in our adapters and solutions, including the likes of FPGAs and the memory components are seeing longer lead times and of course, volatility in availability. But the good news is that our engagement with our customers allows us to have a solid level of visibility into how we plan our quarterly delivery. And we have put some mitigation factors in place as well by some level of pre-purchasing of these parts, both across FPGAs and memory. So this allows us to deliver our products to plan to the 26 revenue, as well as towards what the customer requirements are in the quarterly distribution of our products.

I think that summed up the last question we had in written form in the Q&A. Good, and I don't think there's more coming in here. Operator, is there more questions on the line? There are no further questions on the phones. Thank you. Then I want to thank everyone for listening in. Enjoy the day, everyone. Thank you. Thank you.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.