This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

Sea1 Offshore
5/15/2024
Good day, everyone, and welcome to the review and presentation of our results for the first quarter. My name is Bernd Omdahl, and I'm the Chief Executive Officer of C1 Offshore. I'm joined by our CFO, Vida Gjerstad, and together we will take you through this presentation. C1 Offshore's report for the first quarter 2024 was released prior to the market opening today and in this presentation we will cover the main highlights for the report and we will refer to the presentation issue together with the financial report and at the end of the presentation we will open up for questions. Looking at the highlights for the quarter we had 26 vessels in operation and all vessels delivered a positive EBITDA margin. We had close to $83 million in revenue and we delivered $33 million in EBITDA, which is equivalent to 40% EBITDA margin. Our cash position at the end of the quarter was close to $77 million. And our book equity ratio was close to 50%. In the quarter, we had class renewals for three of our vessels, which are impacting the margin. And our firm backlog is now $857 million. And there are $603 million in options attached. The total backlog, including options, are US$1.46 billion. Looking at the contract awards in the first quarter, we signed two long-term contracts for our two well-intentioned vessels, CM Helix 1 and CM Helix 2. The new contracts will commence 1 January 2025 and 1 January 2026 with a firm period for six years with five yearly options. Firm contract backlog for the two vessels are $608 million and $1.1 billion when including the options. CM Spare Fish got a one year contract with PXGU and there is one optional year attached to that contract. We also signed a contract with the same client for CM Dorado taking her until end of 2024. For the two Brazilian built vessels, the PSV CM Giant and CM Atlas, we secured two contracts with Total in Brazil. Duration of the contracts are three years firm with four years of options. And for CM Atlas, the firm period is nine months with options until end of 2027. We have also got in place a medium-term contract for the anchor handler CM Ruby, taking her until the end of the year. And in addition, it's worth mentioning that we recently signed a contract for oil spill recovery vessel CM Maritisis, and the contract duration is four years. And yesterday we concluded 200 days for the CM Emerald. Furthermore, the company agreed to sell nine of our vessels to the major shareholder, CM Sustainable Energy, in exchange for 35.7% of the company's shares. As part of the transaction, 117.5 million of debt will follow the nine vessels. The vessels will be transferred as soon as practical possible, but no later than 1st of July. Then we had the AGM that was held on the 7th of May, and a new board is in place with Mr. Sveaus as the chairman. Two new board members were also elected, Mr. Fredrik Plato and Mr. Ørjan Svanevik. I will hand over to my colleague Vidar Gjerstad that will give you some more details regarding the results for the first quarter.
Thank you Bernd. C1 Offshore's first quarter report confirms a continuation of the positive market trend. The company had $83.2 million in revenue in the quarter, up from $76.5 million same quarter last year. The uplift is particularly strong when we know that the revenue was negatively affected by the dry docking and class renewal of the three OCV vessels, CM Barracuda, CM Spearfish and CM Stingray. Operating expenses was $44.6 million. That is higher by 10.4 million compared to same quarter last year. However, we must be aware that number one, the operating expenses in first quarter last year was positively affected by a one-off incident of $3.7 million. Point number two, changes of operational area and thereby cost level for certain vessels represent 3.4 million in increase in OPEX. And point three, Related to the mentioned class renewals of the three vessels, we had an increase in operating expenses of 1.1 million. So after this, 2.3 million dollars remains as a gap in the operating expenses figures compared to last year. And this is explained by other smaller issues, incidents and inflation. Administrative expenses came in at 5.6 million compared to 5.2 million last year. Epidea for the quarter was 32.9 million, down from 37 million. Depreciation was 18.2 million. This is somewhat higher than last year due to reversal of impairment on vessels at year end of 2023 and general capital expenditures last 12 months. There were no impairments or reversal of impairments in the quarter. Operating profit ended at $14.7 million, down from $20.1 million. Net financial items were negative by $3 million, and that's compared to a positive figure of $9.7 million last year. However, last year was largely affected by one-off incidents, and you can read more about that in Note 9. Net profit before taxes ended therefore at $11.7 million. Net profit after taxes ended at $11.6 million. And after adjusting from a minority shareholder in one of our subsidiaries, we end up at $11.8 million. This slide shows operating margin distributed on segments. The figures are before G&A expenses. On the left-hand side, we see operating margin in the quarter. The $2.4 million or 9% decrease in the subsea segment relate to the previous mentioned three vessels in dry dock for class renewal. This has been affecting operating margin negatively through both less revenue and increased operating expenses in the quarter. The PSV market was more challenging than expected this quarter and margin ended down by $800,000. The anchor handling market is improving. An increase in charter rates and utilization has increased operating margin by $3.3 million, or more than 50% this quarter compared to the same quarter last year. Other segments are down. However, if we exclude the one-off incident of $3.7 million from last year, it is unchanged. Actually, The vessel operating activities isolated in these other segments has a small increase in operating margin. And let's take a look at the balance sheet. The company has now $534 million in book equity and a book equity ratio of 49.7%. Gross interest bearing debt is $443 million. $156 million of outstanding debt under certain facilities mature in December 2024 and is expected to be refinanced during the year. We are comfortable with the situation and our position, and we see good interest from a variety of lenders. Net interest-bearing debt is $366 million. C1 Offshore's financial position is strong. And the cash flow for the first quarter shows the following. We started the year with $97 million in cash. We have received $23 million from operations. We have paid $6 million in interest. We have invested $21 million in the vessels. We have repaid $20 million in debt and some other changes. We ended the quarter with $77 million in cash. Even though first quarter historically represent winter season and lower activity, and first quarter this year has been particularly cutbacks intensive, the company has repaid $20 million in debt. Going forward, we see that C1 Offshore's capacity to repay debt is good. And now the contract backlog. Note this overview is excluding backlog of the nine vessels to be sold, And this is the backlog as of today. The firm backlog amounts of $857 million with quality counterparties. In addition, clients have options representing $603 million in revenue. Total amount if all clients exercise all options is $1.46 billion. The subsidy segment dominate with 81% of the firm backlog. The two well intervention vessels or helix vessels are part of this segment. Our Brazilian PSVs has 6% of the firm backlog. Our six remaining anchor handling vessels represent 6% of the firm backlog. And our Brazilian fast crew and oil spill recovery vessels has 7% of the firm backlog. On this slide, you see firm contracts and options in green and vacant vessel capacity in blue. The anchor handling vessels represent the largest exposure to the markets, implicating market risk and market opportunities going forward. However, under the current continuing trend of improving markets, we believe the available capacity going forward represent an attractive earnings potential. Back to you, Bernd.
Okay, looking at our fleet, we have now a fleet of 17 owned vessels as listed on this slide and in addition we have 12 vessels under our management. The vessels now owned by C1 Offshore are as follows. We have six anchor handlers, that is the CM Emerald, CM Aquamarine, CM Amethyst, CM Sapphire, CM Ruby and Avalon Sea. We have two Well Intervention Vessels, which is the CM Helix 1 and CM Helix 2. We have two Construction Vessels, which is CM Spare Fish and CM Dorado. We have two PSVs, CM Giant and CM Atlas. We have two Oil Spill Recovery Vessels, CM Maratisis and CM Maragogi. And we have two Fast Crew Vessels, CM Pendutiba and CM Piata. and we have one core drilling vessel, which is the JOIDUS Resolution. The company has a very good global footprint, which is important for the utilization of the fleet. We will continue to move vessels around the world where we can perform safe operations with sustainable conditions. It is important to remember that we have only changed name to C1 Offshore. The know-how remains in the company and so will the office locations around the world. We will now go through the company owned vessels. For the anchor handler segments, there are mainly shorter contracts and campaigns. Currently, we have CM Emerald trading the North Sea spot markets. We signed a contract for her yesterday, so she will leave the North Sea for another region. Then we have the three anchor handlers, CM Sapphire, CM Amethyst and CM Aquamarine, which are trading in Asia on term contracts. Then the CM Ruby, also an anchor handler, is on a term contract in Argentina, keeping her employed throughout the year. and the last anchor handler Avalon Sea is on a term contract in Canada. Moving on to the construction vessels. The CM Spare Fish is on a firm contract which gives utilization throughout the year. She is currently operating on the west coast of Africa. And then we have CM Dorado on a firm contract currently in Brazil. The two well intervention vessels, CM Helix 1 and CM Helix 2, are both on term contracts working offshore Brazil. In our fleet we have two PSVs, both of them on term contracts in Brazil, that is the CM Atlas and CM Giant. And for the smaller Brazilian fleets, as we call it, we have the oil spill recovery vessels, CM Maragogi and CM Maratices, both on long-term contracts with Petrobras. And we have the fast crew vessels, CM Pendotiba and CM Piata, they are both on bare boat charters. And then the JOIDES resolution, the core drilling vessel, continue working around the globe on a term contract. As shown on a previous slide, we have a good contract coverage for this year. At the same time, it's important to have a vessel available in an improving market, so there is an increased potential of earnings. Just a slide giving a summary of the market for the first quarter. The quarter was, as expected, a bit slow at the start and then increasing towards the end of the quarter. The North Sea sport market was characterized by limited utilization for anchor handlers and PSVs. And for the anchor handler market, it is expected to remain volatile going forward. The subsea segment was tight with the competition between renewable projects and traditional oil and gas campaigns, which are impacting the utilization and also the day rates in a positive way. Most segments are experiencing an increased number of multi-year contracts, which is a signal that charters are processing positioning themselves for future projects. The expected increase in activity for all segments indicates good market prospects for our high-end fleet. So to summarize, we delivered a strong quarter with high activity. We had several vessels class renewed. We delivered first class operation with an excellent HSEQ performance. continued improved financial position and we have a strong backlog with quality clients and there is a positive long-term market outlook in all segments. That was the end of the presentation and we will now open up for questions.
If you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial pound key six on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Newt Martin Carlson from Commandeer Capital. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon and thank you for taking my question. I have a two-part question regarding the anchor handling supply side. Given the recent development in the anchor handling supply market where we have seen Viking supply ship acquire high spec vessels from Oceaneel and noting that there are very few vessels promoted in the market and those are mostly low quality and low bullet pool vessels. It appears that the market is experiencing some tightening. Could you please share your insights on the current state of the supply side in the anchor handling sector with regard to vessel acquisitions? That's the first one. Thank you.
Well, I cannot comment on Viking supply ships acquiring anchor handlers but I mean we are following the market tight and if we see there's any good opportunities we will consider them. There's a limited number of high spec anchor handlers on a worldwide basis so we believe that the anchor handle market will tighten going forward.
Thank you. And considering the prolonged hiatus in new chip construction since the market downturn in 2010, what are your thoughts on new build activity within the anchor handling sector? Are you observing any notable trends or upticks in new build orders? And what is your perspective on the industry capacity to initiate and sustain new build projects at this juncture?
I think it's hard to justify building new anchor handlers the way the market is. It's very volatile. Yes, we see really good day rates obtained for shorter periods of time. But then again, you have a number of days where you're idle. So the average day rate in overview doesn't justify building high spec anchor handlers.
Thank you and finally just a follow-up. We've seen some activity where PSV vessels that left the oil and gas market for for example aquaculture are coming back into the oil and gas market. Is there any supply that could come from those sort of reversing for the anchor handlers such as those that have been sold to the coast guard and similar?
It's hard to say, but we don't believe so. I mean, many of the vessels that have gone to the fishing industry, fish farming industry, I think that's low spec, older vessels. So we don't see that as a, call it competition, that those vessels will come back. Okay. Thank you. That's all for me. All right. Is there any other questions, please?
As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad. There are no more questions at this time, so I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments.
So please, if there's any questions, please dial 5 on your phone and we are ready to answer them. Okay, if there's no further questions, we thank you all for attending. Thank you and have a good day.