This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

Softwareone Hldg Ag
8/26/2026
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to a SoftwareOne H1-2026 results conference call and live webcast.
I am Matilde, the course call operator.
I would like to remind you that all participants will be in listen-only mode in the conference if she is recorded. The presentation will be followed by Q&A session. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star and 1 on your telephone. For operator assistance, please press star and zero. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Shil Arne Hansen, Head of Investor Relations at SoftwareOne. Please go ahead.
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining SoftwareOne's H1-26 presentation. My name is Shil Arne Hansen, Head of Investor Relations at SoftwareOne. Joining me today are CEO Rafael Erd and CFO Hans-Petter Schrammer. In terms of agenda, Rafael will start with an overview of the H126 business performance. Hans-Petter will then take us through our detailed financial performance. And finally, Rafael will present the outlook for 26 and share his closing remarks. Before handing over, please let me draw your attention to the disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements and non-IFRS measures on slides two and three. With that, I will hand it over to Rafael.
Thank you, Shell Arne, and a warm welcome to everyone joining the call. I'm proud of our performance in the first half of 2026. On a combined like-for-like basis, we delivered 11.6% year-on-year revenue growth. We also delivered a 24.9% adjusted EBITDA margin. a 4.5 percentage point improvement versus the prior year, with our profitability translating into a cash conversion ratio of 69% over the last 12 months. We achieved 100 million Swiss francs of run rate cost synergies, delivering the top end of the announced target six months ahead of the original schedule. Integration is now substantially completed, with the company's focus shifting fully to commercial execution and customer value creation. Now let's take a closer look at the financial results. I will mainly focus on the like-for-like performance as this best illustrates the results of the combined business. Q2 26 maintained a strong momentum from Q1. with revenue growing 10.4% year-on-year. As a result, H126 revenue increased 11.6% year-on-year, with all regions and business lines contributing to growth. As already mentioned, in H1 2026, we delivered an adjusted EBITDA margin of 24.9%, an improvement of 4.5 percentage points versus the prior year period. Q2 26 was particularly strong. This adjusted EVDA margin reaching 28.9% up 5.4 percentage points year on year. I would also like to highlight that our reported EVDA margin for the first half of 2026 was 22.7%. This is an increase of 5.2 percentage points compared to SoftwareOne's standalone reported EVDA in H125, reflecting well-executed integration and synergy realization. Overall, our results illustrate the strengths of our business model and confirm the strategic rationale of the merger we closed a year ago. Now, let's look at the business line performance on a combined like-for-like basis. In H126 all business lines showed positive growth with channel and services showing an exceptional 35.6 and 17.4% growth at constant currency respectively. Software and cloud direct grew 1.5% in H1 driven by EA to CSP conversion. This continued in Q2 However, growth declined 1.8% as the comparative period benefited from several larger deals. We expect direct to return to growth in H226. Adjusted EBITDA margin for the first half of 2026 ended at 50.8% at the same level as last year. Our channel business had an exceptional first half of the year, growing 35.6%. is an adjusted EBITDA margin ending at 57.2%, an increase of 9.3% versus prior period. This clearly proves the key message from our CMD. This is a very scalable business model. The growth in H126 was led by CSB business, as well as strong growth from other ISVs, with AWS at the forefront. In addition, the expansion of cloud IQ to new countries further contributed to Q2 26 performance. Performance in our services business was also strong in the period led by CSP related services. In addition, cloud services, especially in AWS and Google, data and AI and cybersecurity continued to deliver strong performance. Profitability in services, business also improved, and our adjusted FEDA margin ended at 8.5% for H126, a significant increase from 3.3% in H125. Growth in H126 was broad-based across all our regions, and I'd like to walk you through key highlights for each region. grew 6.8%. Microsoft-related growth remained strong, driven mainly by continued EA to CSP conversion, which also drove double-digit growth in our services business. Western Europe grew 11.7%, driven by strong double-digit growth in services and over 50% growth in channel, supported by continued EA to CSP acceleration in direct. The Nordics delivered particularly strong growth of 26%. Our services business, which amount to over half of the regional revenue, grew close to 20%. Direct delivered double-digit growth and general grew more than 50%. I'm very pleased with our progress in North America, which delivered its second consecutive quarter of growth. up 8.6% for H1-26. This was driven by a channel which nearly doubled year over year alongside strong services growth from CSP and AWS cloud services. APEC was our fastest growing region, up 23% for H1-26 and accelerating to 27% in Q2. Growth was broad-based, with particular strengths in Australia and New Zealand, India, Southeast Asia and North China. The service business remains the primary growth engine, led by cloud services and cybersecurity. LATAM grew 6.9% to 49.3 million CHF, led by services, cybersecurity, data and AI, and AWS. with direct stable year over year. Brazil and Mexico both contributed positively. And lastly, CEE grew 16.7% to CHF 42 million with strong performance across all business lines, particularly in Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria. Let me now share a great example of how SoftwareOne moves from project execution to strategic engagement. What started as a cloud migration project has become a strategic partnership. Together with Allianz Ayutthaya, the Thailand-based subsidiary of Allianz, a leading global insurance and asset management company, we successfully migrated over 500 servers to AWS. reduced infrastructure operational run costs by 24% and accelerated their cloud transformation journey. Today, we are supporting broader modernization and innovation initiatives, such as development of an app that would modernize Allianz Ayudhya's life and health claims process, demonstrating how our business model and offering coupled with successful execution creates opportunities for deeper customer relationships. And with that, I will hand it over to our CFO, Hans-Peter Schrauner, who will take you through the financial details of the first half of 26.
Thank you, Raphael, and welcome from my side as well. I will now take you through the IFRS income statement. As a reminder, the 26 income statement includes Crayon, which has been consolidated since 1st of July 1995 and therefore significantly impacts year-over-year comparisons. Revenue grew 68.2% to $818.3 million in H1-26. Performance also reflects tailwind from multi-year CSD contracts and early renewals triggered by Microsoft price increases in July 26, consistent with the trends we saw in Q1. Reported EBITDA increased to 185.4 million, responding to a margin of 22.7%, a significant improvement of 5.2 percentage points Hldg Ag Hldg Ag Hldg Ag Hldg Ag Hldg Ag The net financial results mainly reflect higher debt levels following the Crayon acquisition, whereas the prior year period benefited from positive fair value adjustments on softer bonds, predicting investment in Crayon. H126 effective tax rate was impacted by non-capitalized tax losses and non-tax-deductible expenses. and as a result, net profit for H126 amounted to 54.3 million. Let me now turn to the bridge from the reported EBITDA to adjusted EBITDA. Adjustments remain low and continue to be largely driven by the Crayon integration activities. In H126, 60.9 million of the total of 18.4 million EBITDA adjustments related to Crayon integration costs. Since the start of integration in 25, cumulative Crayon integration expenses have reached 42.3 million as of H1 26. We now expect total cumulative integration costs by the end of 27 to be in the range of 75 to 85 million below the initial estimates of 80 to 100 million. Looking ahead, we anticipate realizing a further 5 to 10 million of cost synergies by the end of 26. With approximately 20 million of integration expenses expected in H226, around 20 million of integration costs remain to be incurred in 2017. This slide summarizes OPEX development on a combined life-for-life basis. OPEX remained broadly flat year over year at 632.9 million. Cost discipline remains intact. Realized incremental in-year cost initiatives of 37 million were largely offset by tax inflation, performance-related compensation, growth invests, and higher third-party delivery costs linked to revenue growth.
FX further reduced OPEX.
also reduced from 33 million to 18 million, reflecting the improvements from reported to underlying profitability. Turning to the balance sheet. As of June 26, net debt stood at 408 million, up from 369.3 million at year end 25. process primarily consists of the $550 million term loan and $200 million drawn on the revolving credit facility. As planned, the bridge facility was fully repaid in January 26. Comparison to June 25 should be viewed with some caution, as the June 25 balance sheet reflects the pre-closing structure. At that time, you have both the bridge facility drawdown and the Crayon shares recorded as financial assets prior to settlement of the transaction. Net working capital of the factoring improved to negative 509.2 million as of June 26 compared to negative 216.6 million a year ago. This improvement mainly reflects the structurally attractive and quiet working capital profile of Crayon. Intangible assets increased substantially following the acquisition and now include the goodwill and the acquired intangible asset recognized as part of the purchase price allocation. I would also like to note that we have now finalized the purchase price allocation for the trade acquisition. As a result of this final valuation work, goodwill was adjusted by 22.5 million retrospectively as of the acquisition date. Hldg Ag Hldg Ag Hldg Ag Hldg Ag Hldg Ag and currency translation adjustments over the period. Turning to working capital, which remains a key management focus. On a like for like basis and looking at the last 12 month period to June 26, networking capital before factoring improved by 46 million. This improvement can even have reduced our utilization of short-term factoring by 12 million. So after factoring, the next improvement was 34 million. I would like to emphasize that we delivered strong growth across the combined business while keeping network and capital broadly stable. This reflects continued discipline in working capital management and ongoing improvements in our underlying processes, which remains a priority going forward. At our capital market day, we introduced a cash conversion target above 60% throughout 26 to 2030 periods. On a last 12 month basis, we delivered a 69% cash conversion excluding the impact of factory. Last 12 months operating cash flow was 271.6 million, primarily driven by profitability. Adjusting for the 12 million reduction in factory utilization operating cash flow was 283.6 million. Of the capex of 71.9 million, free cash flow amounted to 211.7 million. Against last 12 months reported EBITDA of 308 million, this translates into a cash conversion rate of 69, well above the target. Lost 12 months capex of 79.9 million was primarily related to internal IT investments, followed by platform investments, with services and other investments accounting for the remainder. As outlined at the Capital Market Day, we expect CapEx to increase modestly during 2027 and 2028 as we accelerate investments in platforms, internal IT and year-to-year initiatives. During this period, CapEx is expected to represent approximately 7% to 8% of revenue before normalizing towards around 5% from 2029 onwards. Regarding cash conversion, you continue to expect a meaningful tailwind from networking capital improvements over the first three years of the plan period, with benefits moderating thereafter. The exact facing will naturally depend on the pace at which we execute further working capital improvements across the combined business. Turning to the H126 cash flow statement. It generated operating cash flow of 90.1 million, up slightly from 87.1 million in the prior year period, supported by stronger profitability. Profit for the period increased significantly from 9.1 million to 54.3 million. Benefit was largely offset by working capital movements, which resulted in 72.1 million cash outflow in H126 compared to a cash inflow of 81.8 million in the prior year. The prior year period benefited from the introduction of our main new loan recourse factoring program. Investing cash flow amounted to an outflow of $34.2 million, primarily reflecting $36.5 million capex, broadly in line with the prior period and focused on internal IT and platform investments. This compares an outflow of $64.7 million in H125, which included the settlement of the swap agreement related to the crayon investment. Financing cash flow was outflow of 102.4 million compared to an inflow of 369.3 million in the prior year. This year's figure was negatively impacted by the acquisition of Crayon Minority Interest. The prior year's figure, by contrast, benefited from 420 4.2 million drawdown of the grain acquisition bridge facility. As a result, cash and cash excellence were 382.8 million at the end of June 26, compared with 419.1 million at the beginning of the year. Let me conclude with the development of MedTech over the last 12 months. As of June 26, net debt stood at $408 million, with a leverage ratio of 1.1. Compared to the net cash position of $36.2 million in June 25, the increase was mainly driven by the acquisition of Crayon. Beyond the acquisition itself, the key cash outflows were income taxes and interest paid, capital expenditure and credit transactions and integration expenses. This concludes the H1 financial review. With that, I will hand over to Raphael for his closing remarks.
Thank you, Hans-Peter. We are tracking well towards delivering against all targets. Looking at the numbers, FI25 revenue growth was 1.4% and on an LTM basis to June 26, that's now at 8.9% growth. Our 26 guidance remains mid to high single digit revenue growth. H2 2026 growth is expected to moderate as the benefits from accelerated EA to CSP conversion and early renewables, which supported H1, don't repeat at the same pace, compounded by a tougher comparison base in H2-25. On EBITDA margin, FI 2025 was 20.9% on an adjusted basis, with LTM now at 23.2%. we continue to guide to above 23% adjusted margin for 2026. Our dividend payout policy remains 30-50% of adjusted profit for 2026, moving to 30-50% of reported profit as we look forward 2030. And lastly, our cash conversion outlook for 2026 is above 60%. We wanted to use today s update as an opportunity to give you a bit more detail on what s driving the path to our 2030 margin ambition we laid out at the Capital markets day in June. As a reminder, we are targeting an FHDA margin above 28% by 2030, a 5 percentage point improvement compared to the 26 outlook which we expect to face roughly linearly over the period. The largest contributor, around 3 percentage points, comes from AI and automation efficiencies and further embedding that across our own internal processes. A further 1 percentage point comes from scaling our channel business. margin expands faster than growth as we scale within our existing footprint and as we expand into new markets. The final percentage point comes from our services business, as AI drives a more scalable delivery model through, for example, central platforms that allow us to leverage expertise globally and standardize some delivery alongside continued SG&A efficiency, the expected to improve margin is no dilution effect. And last but not least, as we have already said this during the CMD, sharpening our services portfolio is something that will contribute to the margin expansion. All three of these build on the foundation we have already delivered. our 100 million CHF cost synergy program completed in H1-26 and continued benefits from the more efficient operating model that the program put in place. Underpinning all of this is continuous cost discipline across the group. And now I'm pleased to present our evolved Executive Board, effective from 1st September. These changes mark the next phase of SoftwareONE's development, increasing regional representation at the Executive Board level and bringing customers, partners and markets closer to decision-making. Regina Manfredi will assume responsibility for the full Americas region, expanding her current mandate for NORAM to include LATAM. Regina led Crayon's NORAM business ahead of the merger and has served as President of North America since July 2025. Ricco Andreoli will lead the full EMEA region, broadening his responsibilities beyond Western Europe to include the Nordics TAS and CEE Rico brings nearly two decades of experience at Software One having joined in 2009 and most recently serving as Regional President Western Europe Varun Palival will continue to lead APEC a region he has led since January 2025 after more than a decade in senior roles at Software One Lastly Gudmundur Adalsteinsson has been appointed Chief Channel and Ecosystem Officer. Gudmundur recently served as Chief Partner and Sales Officer and brings more than 25 years in the software and cloud industry, including a decade at Crayon in senior commercial leadership roles. Combined, the new structure strengthens accountability and supports faster execution. I would also like to mention that our Chief Operating Officer Oliver Bergstoltz has decided to leave the company. Let me close with a few key takeaways. With integration substantially complete and synergies of 100 million achieved, our focus is now shifting fully from integration to commercial execution and customer value creation. We remain on track to deliver on our 2026 financial targets across growth, marching and cash conversion. And we continue to focus on sustainable working capital improvements to first strengthen our cash generation. Taken together, this sets a clear foundation for how we execute against our ambition going forward. And with that, we will now move to the Q&A.
We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and 1 on the telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and 2. Questioners on the phone are requested to disable the loudspeaker mode and eventually turn off the volume from the webcast while asking a question. Anyone who has a question, you press star and 1 at this time. The first question comes from the line of Nooshin Mizabi from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good morning, Rafal. Good morning, Hans Peter, and congrats on the quarter. I have a couple of questions on margin. Given how strong margin has been in H1, why are you only reiterating the guide for 2026? I guess my question is, what are you expecting to weigh on margin in H2? And on 2030 margin bridge, and thanks for the color, very useful. The biggest piece is from AI and automation efficiencies. How much investments do you need to achieve this? And where exactly do you see those coming from? Is it internal processes, SG&A, or delivery productivity? And if I may also on the linearity of that expansion, Do you also expect the contribution from AI to be linear, or is that more back-end loaded? Thank you.
Thank you very much for the question. Maybe first of all on the ABDA margin targets. I think the lower end of the range would require a scenario where several things I would say it would move against us at once. We are not seeing evidence of that today. The range as guided reflects the realistic band of outcomes. But based on the underlying growth trajectory, the momentum in services and channel and the trends across our regions, we are comfortable that we will land in the range and we are from an EBITDA margin positive that we will not land at the bottom of the 23%. I hope this clarifies your question on the EBITDA margin. And I think you had a point related to the AI efficiencies. We mentioned before on the trajectory to reach the 28% plus target How much investment do you need to achieve this?
This is what we have communicated at the Capital Market Day. The capital yield will increase in 2027-2028 to, we said also today, 7-12% of revenue, funding these investments in AI and automation, and the funding will come from the release of networking capital. so it should be in a way cash neutral. So we don't have every investment the next two years and then benefiting the years to come.
Thank you, very helpful.
The next question comes from the line of Lurian Traj from Kepler-Chevreux. Please go ahead.
Yes, good morning, gentlemen. Thanks for taking my question. I have basically two questions around this EA to CSP shift. The first is, can you simply, can you kind of quantify the tailwinds you have seen in H1 and what you expect to happen in H2? Or can we argue that higher pricing at Microsoft can compensate for the higher comparison base in H2? And the second one is, like you flagged it, the CSP shift has also positively impacted your services margin Can you talk a bit about sustainability in that segment if you look into the coming quarters? If it's fair to assume a 10% plus margin all through the quarters to come? Thank you.
Thank you very much, Florian. We mentioned during the call that the EA to CSP conversion was a bit accelerated in H1 due to early renewables. due to the fact of the price increases of Microsoft as per July. That clearly gave us certain tailwinds in H1. And we mentioned that the tailwind is around 4 percentage points overall. And this will then also have an impact on H2. We see a bit of decelerated growth compared to H1. The second point, it's absolutely true that the EA to CSP conversion has an impact not only on our direct or general business, but also on our services. Business line has a positive impact because we sell CSP always as a bundle which consists of the license plus a service wrapped around. Typically this is, there is various support packages which we offer to our customers there is always a service wrapped around and obviously that then also helps us accelerate our services business and contributes to the growth which we have achieved in H1 and will also contribute to the growth which we see in H2 Great, thank you
We now have a question from the line of Mark Berge from Finanz- und Wirtschaft. Please go ahead.
Yes, thank you. Actually, my questions were already asked. Yes, I was interested about the tailwind that you get due to the early renewals, but you already clarified that. Thank you.
Thank you.
As a reminder, if you wish to register for a question, please press star and one on your telephone. The next question comes from the line of Christopher Tom from UBS. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe just one from my side. On Microsoft 2027 incentive changes, I was just wondering what your thoughts were on the introduction of growth margins. and the change of channel partner incentive changes.
Thank you very much, Christopher. I mean, we think broadly speaking on the FI27 incentive framework, the focus is increasingly on growth, basically. And partners which grow fast, they can, I would say, benefit, right? As for Microsoft announced, they announced the 5% margin reduction from October 26 on products such as 365, E1, E3, OneDrive, SharePoint. Based on our discussions with Microsoft and also our assessment, it suggests that we would not expect a meaningful impact overall. Any reduction on these products should largely be balanced by other incentive opportunity. Also, these products make up only a small part of our overall CSP business. And therefore, I would expect there is actually no material impact for us on the incentive changes. We see them as very neutral.
Got it. Thank you very much.
We now have a question from the line of Christian Bader from Zürcher Kantonalbank. Please go ahead.
Yes, good morning. Congratulations to these excellent numbers. I have a question regarding taxes. Your IFRS reported tax rate was 42% in the first six months. However, in terms of cash taxes, the cash effective tax rate was only 20%. So I was wondering Can you maybe provide some color of what we should model for the full year?
For 26, you can assume a more normalized tax rate of in the range of 30%.
And is this a good runway for the years thereafter?
Of course, the ambition is to further reduce. Hldg Ag Hldg Ag Hldg Ag Hldg Ag
Yes, thank you. Could you maybe explain the logic behind the reorganization? Why did you decide to streamline it and reduce the number of regions? Thank you.
Thank you, Mark. As we have mentioned, we go now into the next phase, right, from integration towards customer focus and execution. That's really the key, and I think It's very vital that we make sure that within the Executive Board we really have the representation which is close to the customers and close to our markets and therefore elevating some of the regions into the Executive Board makes a lot of sense. That's what we have done now. We have three overarching regions with EMEA, Americas and APEC, focusing exactly on this. And then also, last but not least, very important is the channel representation and our vendor partnership representation in the executive board with Gudmundur joining. He mentioned the channel business, which is part of 2030. Hldg Ag
Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Shir Arne Hansen for any closing remarks.
Thank you and thank you everyone for joining and as always, please don't hesitate to reach out to the IR team if you have any follow-up questions. Thank you.
Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now over. Thank you for choosing Coruscall and thank you for participating in the conference. You may now disconnect your lines. Goodbye.