Cameco Corporation

Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Cameco Corporation third quarter 2023 conference call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there'll be an opportunity to ask questions. To join the question queue, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. Should you need assistance during the conference call, you may signal an operator by pressing star and zero. Webcast participants are asked to wait until the Q&A session before submitting their questions as the information they are looking for may be provided during the presentation. I would now like to turn the conference over to Rochelle Girard, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Operator, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Cameco's third quarter conference call. With a very busy international travel schedule this quarter, our quarterly board meetings were held off-site, rather than at our corporate office in Saskatoon. With us today on the call are Kim Gitzel, President and CEO, joining the call from Vienna, Austria. Grant Isaac, Executive VP and CFO. Heidi Schake, Senior VP and Deputy CFO. Brian Riley, Senior VP and Chief Operating Officer. Sean Quinn, Senior VP, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary. And Alice Wong, Senior VP and Chief Corporate Officer. I'm going to hand it over to Tim in just a moment to discuss the current nuclear market environment, how today's market compares to previous cycles, and how it provides the basis for Cameco's improving prospects. After, we will open it up for your questions. As always, our goal is to be open and transparent with our communications. Therefore, if you have detailed questions about our quarterly financial results, or should your questions not be addressed on this call, we will be happy to follow up with you after the call. There are a few ways to contact us. You can reach out to the contacts provided in our news release, you can submit a question through the contact tab on our website, or you can use the ask a question form at the bottom of the webcast screen and we will be happy to follow up after this call. If you join the conference call through our website event page, there are slides available which will be displayed during the call. In addition, for your reference, our quarterly investor handout is available for download in a PDF file on our website at Cameco.com. Today's conference call is open to all members of the investment community, including the media. During the Q&A session, please limit yourself to two questions and then return to the queue. Please note that this conference call will include forward-looking information, which is based on a number of assumptions, and actual results could differ materially. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements we make today, except as required by law. Please refer to our most recent annual information form and MD&A for more information about the factors that could cause these different results and the assumptions we have made. With that, I will turn it over to Tim.

Well, thank you, Rochelle, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us for today's call. I'm pleased to start today's call by announcing an addition to Cameco's executive team. Effective November 1, Dominique Kieran will be joining Cameco as Global Managing Director of our subsidiary in the United Kingdom. Dominique brings extensive international executive experience in the nuclear fuel, chemical, and broader technology industries, which will enhance the skill set of our strong and experienced leadership group. His wide-ranging expertise will help facilitate Cameco's growth across the nuclear value chain. Dominic brings over 20 years of leadership experience to Cameco. Most recently, he served as Chief Executive Officer with Babcock Nuclear. Previously, he was with Yerenko for 15 years in increasingly senior leadership roles, including Chief Commercial Officer, and gained a wealth of experience from his diverse responsibilities. We look forward to having Dominic join our Cameco team. As Rachelle mentioned, I'm joining today from Vienna, Austria, where tomorrow I'll be attending meetings of the IAEA's Standing Advisory Group on Nuclear Energy. Mr. Raphael Grossi, the IAEA's Director General, appoints group members from governments, research institutions, and the nuclear industry to advise the Agency on nuclear power and fuel cycle activities and provide guidance on matters concerning capacity for long-term energy security. This trip adds to what has been a very busy fall. Back in Canada, I met with Ukrainian President Zelensky and Prime Minister Trudeau in September, followed by a trip with a Cameco delegation in October to the head office and operations of Energoatom in Kyiv, reinforcing our commitment and support for Ukraine's energy independence. We also joined the OECD's inaugural Roadmaps to New Nuclear Conference in Paris, where government and industry leaders met to build leadership and cooperation in nuclear energy. These are all proud moments for us at Cameco that highlight the impact our work is having around the world. Our invitation to these types of influential meetings highlights our credibility as a company and our well-respected position in the nuclear fuel market. and they provide us with unique insight and the opportunity to be in the room where important policies are discussed in support of the global nuclear industry. It's an industry that is getting significant attention today and that's being recognized for the numerous benefits and advantages it can offer to the global energy supply and to energy security. This past quarter we saw players from all facets of the nuclear sector congregate in London for the World Nuclear Association's annual symposium, where the atmosphere was more optimistic than it's been for over a decade, maybe ever. With over 40 years in this industry, I feel well qualified in saying, yes, we've seen enthusiasm in past cycles. However, at the symposium this year, there was a sense of urgency that I can't say we've experienced before. Each time the market has entered a period of transition, stakeholders look back at previous cycles to highlight similarities and common threads in an attempt to predict the duration and durability of the positive momentum. If you followed the industry and Cameco through the 2000s, or if you're one of the exceptional few that might have been paying attention even earlier than that, you would have heard us talking about things like potential long-term demand growth, or supply pressure building on the horizon, or the level of financial interest in buying physical uranium. We are, of course, seeing those similarities right now, but with the added element of urgency, I think there is much more to the story this time. So for today's call, rather than our customary approach of highlighting industry developments in the context of Cameco's strategy, I thought we would provide our view of what sets the current industry environment apart from previous cycles, pulling the various factors together into one discussion. And in doing so, I want to emphasize how Cameco, as one of the leading suppliers in the industry, is also evolving to maximize value while addressing the urgent call to action. Let's consider the durability of demand, first in the context of climate change. Some will argue that the climate crisis isn't new, as it's been part of the conversation for decades now. But what's different today is that urgency. It's no longer just a model on paper with academics running computer simulations. Increasing average global temperatures and the fires and floods that are becoming more and more frequent can't be ignored. The evidence continues to point to our carbon-based energy systems as a key contributor to the problem. This has led to electron accountability and proposals by countries and companies for achieving net zero targets taking center stage. And today it's clear, achieving those targets does not happen without nuclear power. That itself is a notable difference, but it goes even deeper. This time, policymakers are not shying away from proposing nuclear as a key part of their energy mix, some even reversing their previously anti-nuclear stance. The WNA sessions in London that I mentioned opened with U.S. Member of Congress Chuck Fleischman and the U.K. Under Secretary of State and Minister for Nuclear and Netrix Andrew Bowie on a panel where they discussed today's bipartisan support in government. That certainly differs from what we've seen in the past and it forms what might be considered a solid base of support for demand growth using clean, reliable, secure, and well-established nuclear technology. Its growth is starting to move beyond Asia, which has been the key component of the industry growth story since the late 2000s. Asia's nuclear expansion obviously remains very important today, but the broader interest and level of potential growth has expanded and is now much more global. Beyond that base of demand growth, another emerging difference in today's demand profile is the potential deployment of new nuclear reactor designs, with a number of small modular reactors and small advanced micro-reactors in development. These represent a clean energy source that would be more accessible in terms of output that better matches small or modest local demand. They're expected to have better cost and schedule control by way of factory production. And they can also address needs beyond electricity, such as applications for industrial heat, desalinization or hydrogen production. Big industrial energy consumers are not waiting for those government decisions and policies I just mentioned. They are moving much more quickly. A number of private companies are taking action and announcing their own plans to support the expansion of clean nuclear energy in the years to come using those promising new technologies. Another big difference that won't be news to anyone is on the geopolitical front. The tension and uncertainty are increasing daily. Events like Russia's invasion of Ukraine and a coup in Niger leaves countries re-evaluating their energy security and who they want to rely upon to supply fuels, avoiding dependencies such as Russian gas. That evaluation of security is being done in the context of their carbon footprint and electron accountability, which leads to consideration of nuclear to a degree we have not seen for nearly a half century. And while countries need secure and dependable energy supply, they also want it to be clean. Political views and policies generally represent the will of the people, and it's clear that public opinion is changing as well. We're seeing a social shift happening like never before. Nuclear energy is an undeniable part of the social conversation. There's vocal support from diverse and sometimes unexpected sources. Sources like social media influencers, Hollywood personalities, and even long-time nuclear protesters like Bono of View2, who just last month admitted that although he has campaigned against nuclear energy for a long time, his view has flipped to support nuclear amid the climate crisis. Taken all together, the overarching differences we're seeing this cycle contribute to that full cycle demand growth you've heard us talk about. Previous bullish cycles were typically underpinned by demand that was more or less out in the future and in the longer term segment of the forward demand curve. This time, we are really seeing that durable demand growth across the full cycle. In the near term, we have financial interests buying physical uranium. in a way that is much different than in the past. Financial participants are not acting as a marginal buyer and seller, purchasing today and selling tomorrow when the price rises by a few cents. Instead, they are providing better transparency by buying material at the market and with limited redemption capabilities, providing a better sense for the intrinsic value of uranium in the near term. Additionally, we have some real end-user near and mid-term demand. That demand is coming from several fully depreciated, safe, operable reactors. Reactors that were slated for decommissioning due to the economics of broken electricity markets are now being saved for their significant low-carbon and secure energy benefits. And it's coming from reactor life extensions. Again, thanks to the security and low-carbon advantages, and recognition that there is no equivalent clean baseload alternative. In the long-term portion of the cycle, demand growth is coming from more traditional new builds, as well as the emergence of the advanced reactors, SMRs and micro-reactors, which have the potential to add significant demand in the coming decades. In the WNA's updated fuel cycle report, released in September, demand is looking more robust than ever, averaging growth of 3.6% annually compared to 2.6% in the previous 2021 report. And that only includes a very light and conservative estimate for demand to fuel those SMRs and new nuclear designs. Geopolitical tensions and energy security concerns are also changing the demand picture. The number of new markets seeking fuel from reliable suppliers and safe jurisdictions have opened up to create full cycle contracting opportunities, especially in Eastern Europe. So those are some significant differences in the context of demand. But what about supply? Well, the uranium market has had its share of supply challenges in past cycles, but the difference today is that the supply picture is more uncertain than ever. First and foremost is primary supply. As demand grows and the mines are depleted, there is no Kazakhstan equivalent source of supply waiting on the sidelines somewhere to meet that growing demand into the 2030s. Even the existing uranium coming out of Kazakhstan is not going to be splashing around in the market as it has in the past. Because Adam Prom has stated that under their value strategy, production now has a home in their long-term contract book. A big reliable supply source is simply not going to materialize, and the pockets of potential production that could be added to the supply stack carry significant greenfield risk. With no clear emerging primary supply, we have to look at the sources of secondary supply, which have been filling the gap. But the shock absorbers of the past are not what they used to be either. So far this year, industry-wide, there has been nearly £144 million committed under long-term contracts, which is a level we've not seen in 10 years, indicating the market remains on track to replacement rate contracting. These signposts provide a signal that inventories in all forms have been run down, and there is certainly no megatons to megawatts program in the works to ease the pressure. Also on secondary supply, there's an ongoing shift to replace Russian fuel supply services and create more capacity in the enrichment segment of the fuel cycle by moving from underfeeding to overfeeding. I won't get into the technical aspects of underfeed, overfeed, but the punchline is that it means less secondary supply going back into the market from enrichers. In fact, similar to the story of rebuilding a depleted inventory beyond run rate requirements, Overfeeding has an exaggerated impact on supply tension by not only reducing secondary supply, but creating secondary demand. So primary and secondary supply of the natural uranium needed at the very start of the fuel cycle is declining. Then there is the matter of actually moving that supply through the cycle. Nobody will say that moving Class VII nuclear material around the globe has ever been easy. but it's clearly facing new risks and challenges as a result of geopolitics. However, the uranium supply story does not end there. Stakeholders have recognized that much more than natural uranium is needed to build a nuclear fuel bundle. The services, refining, conversion, enrichment, deconversion, pelletization, and fuel fabrication are getting more attention than ever. and the degree to which they are interdependent complicates the typical supply-demand analysis of a commodity. And those other segments of the fuel cycle are also facing challenges. Based on lessons learned, we're seeing a new common theme across producers and services at all stages of the cycle. Suppliers have been clear, they are not going to front-run demand with uncommitted supply. If they're going to add back, expand, or build new production or processing capacity, they need contracts and commitments from end users to support their investments. That has not been a central consideration in the past. As we hold those contracting conversations with customers to lock in long-term value, it's also important to consider today's pricing environment. We've never been this early in the cycle with prices as high as they are today. That's a significant factor that some might be thinking could hamper the momentum, but it isn't. That's because of the improving electricity prices rising faster than front end fuel prices, which has rarely, if ever, been the case for us in nuclear. That means customers can better tolerate the realities of sustainable fuel pricing and focus on shoring up inventories to help ensure security of supply. So all those differences in today's nuclear fuel cycle from both the demand and supply perspective mean that Cameco, as a diversified nuclear fuel supplier, has more opportunities in front of us than ever. And compared to the Cameco of previous cycles, we're different as well. This time we don't have big capital-intensive greenfield mines under construction. As we see demand come to the market, we have multiple Tier 1 licensed permitted and approved assets, we can bring back to capacity and expand. In fact, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission just awarded us 20-year license extensions at MacArthur River and Key Lake, which is double the term of our previous license. And at Rabid Lake, we received a 15-year license extension. We believe that our commitment to protecting the health and safety of our people and the public and to protecting the environment is reflected in the extended duration of the licenses. And as we add contracts to our portfolio for the delivery of uranium in the years to come, we also have several already built and permitted Tier 2 assets where costs and economics are established and proven. These are all sources of proven and reliable supply from a preferred jurisdiction. And of course, it doesn't end there. We have what we believe are some of the best advanced exploration projects and most prospective land positions in the business. Today, we are more focused on our core expertise, having divested interests in gold and power generation, and as a pure play nuclear investment, we are very well positioned to maximize value. There's improved recognition of the importance and interdependence of the entire fuel cycle beyond uranium as a core commodity. This means that our long-established and reliable fuel services division, as well as our investment in global laser enrichment and its next-generation enrichment technology, are being highlighted for their strategic importance. And I'm not using the word strategic in place of economic. We've been invested across the fuel cycle since inception, and I think those assets are more valuable to us today from a financial perspective than they've ever been. Considering our uranium and fuel cycle assets together from an investment perspective, we offer exciting upside exposure to an in-demand commodity at a time when supplies have never been more uncertain. And at the same time, we offer the stability and protection of an impressive long-term contract portfolio representing a stream of earnings and cash flow that provides exposure to rising prices. And our pipeline of contract discussions continues to grow. And with our partner Brookfield, we continue to work toward closing our acquisition of Westinghouse by the end of the year. That transaction is very well aligned with our pure plain nuclear strategy. With several parts of that business being more stable and less tied to the ups and downs of the commodity, it's expected to complement our high quality tier one uranium and fuel services assets. Cameco's valuation should therefore reflect a scarcity premium. No other publicly traded uranium company offers similar exposure to that durable, full cycle demand growth across the fuel cycle that's occurring in the nuclear industry. So I think it's clear the drivers that supported the positive momentum of cycles in that past are important factors in today's environment. However, the urgency and the differences impacting demand and supply And the strategy Cameco has pursued over the past decade has made us a different company today than we've been in the past. Combined, these factors set up this cycle to be more exciting than ever. The improving market conditions coupled with our strategic decisions are also benefiting our financial performance. We're seeing improvements in our earnings, gross profit, and cash flow, which was evident again this quarter. and we expect our financial performance to improve further as we continue our transition back to a Tier 1 run rate. Cameco's strategy of contracting discipline, production discipline, and risk-managed financial discipline is set within the context of the transitioning market environment we're currently in. With $2.7 billion in cash, $1 billion in total debt, and a $1 billion undrawn credit facility, our balance sheet remains strong. We will retain our conservative financial management to support our balanced and disciplined contracting and supply decisions, providing us with the ability to self-manage risks and retain the capacity to pursue value-adding investments like Westinghouse. Before moving into our Q&A session today, it is with an enormously heavy heart that I acknowledge and remember Ian Bruce. a dear friend, valued colleague, and Cameco's longtime board chair, who tragically passed away at his cottage in Ontario on October 16th. I've worked with Ian since he joined our board more than a decade ago, and on behalf of the entire Cameco family, I extend our deepest condolences to Ian's wife Darlene and his family and many friends and loved ones. His business acumen, personal and professional advice, Overall leadership and most importantly friendship were absolutely invaluable to Cameco and his absence during yesterday's board discussions was notable. Ian was excited about nuclear energy and the company's future and he was extremely proud to be part of the Cameco team. He will be profoundly missed.