This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

MustGrow Biologics Corp.
8/31/2026
Welcome to Musgro Biologics Q2 2026 earnings call with CEO Corey Giasson and COO Colin Bletsky. The financial statements and management discussion and analysis are available on CDAR+. Today's remarks may contain forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Please refer to Musgro's filings on CDAR for more information. After management's remarks, we will open the call for questions. Participants may submit questions in the question and answer window. Welcome, gentlemen, and please begin your presentation.
Thank you, Martin. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to Musgrove's Q2 2026 earnings call and question and answer session. Before I begin, I'd like to draw your attention to our disclaimer. Forward-looking statements are going to be made in this presentation and the Q&A session at the end. Again, some of these statements will not come to fruition. This disclaimer can be read on our website at musgrove.ca. So last week we announced the Q2 2026 results. Terrasante sales revenue for the quarter was $75,000. Gross profit was a gross loss negative margin of about $17,000. That was due to us shipping product from Asia through air freight into the US and it's quite costly as you can see. licensing revenue. We were able to report in Q2 that we had earned licensing revenue of about $1.4 million and we made the announcement a couple of weeks ago that we'd received that portion of the cash. So in the Q2 financial statements, it reads as in accounts receivable. Our expenses continue to normalize without Nexus BioAg with about $900,000 quarterly of expenses. and Net Profit, which includes the discontinued operations of Nexus BioAg. We had a profit of about $300,000 versus a loss of about 1.1 million in Q2 of 2025. We have a strong cash position now with the capital raise that we completed in June. We're sitting on cash at the end of the quarter of about 4.4 million and a working capital of 5.2 million. So some comments on the results for 2026. Again, as we indicated in Q1's call in May, that we expected the first half of the year's sales to be slower than expected. This is due to manufacturing, specifically manufacturing issues. The new plants that have been brought online, they're having some hiccups and not being able to produce product uh enough product in a timely fashion for us to get into the market that's why we were focused on some of the product that they were able to produce to utilize air freight to get it into the market in time but we are starting to see some improvements in terms of manufacturing. And we did announce in this latest earnings news release sent out on Thursday that as of August 15th of this year, year to date sales are about $900,000, which is up about 46% compared to all of 2025. So we are starting to see some improvements in manufacturing. As we go forward, air freight being as costly as it is, We're looking to move the rest of the product for the remainder of the year and into 27 with ocean freight, which we should start to see our margins improve back to where we see in a Q1 of about 24% and potentially better. Going forward, our focus is to drive TerraSante sales. We continue to see an uptick in demand and Colin will get into some of that in the question and answer session. But we need to be able to have our manufacturers produce enough product in a timely manner for us to get the product into the market. And we're starting to see them do that. I'm very confident that they're going to continue to see improvements in manufacturing. And we are also assessing opportunities to supplement production here in Canada and potentially the US. We've seen a strong second start to the second half of the year as you've seen over 900,000 or about approximately $900,000 of sales year to date. And we expect the remaining four months of 2026 and going into 2027 to be even stronger. We're excited to receive our first milestone payment from Bayer. This continues to validate the efficacy of our technology and the need for it in the market. And we look forward to working with Bayer going forward, working our way towards doing the work and completing the tasks required for our second milestone payment.
So on that, I thought I'd go into just a reminder of what the Bayer commercial license is and what is around it and kind of the going forward with it. As you remember, back in 2023, we did sign a crucial exclusive agreement with Bayer for the biopesticide and bioherbicide, and that was all focused around Europe, Africa, and Middle East. and we don't need to really go into the why, the why still remains. European Union specifically and the regions around it are moving away from the synthetic chemistries. It's harder for a lot of these large organizations to get the registrations in place and get some of the synthetic chemicals and fertilizers into those markets. So the need is growing and continues to grow within that region right across where Bayer is working. And, you know, when we look at the commitment from Bayer, we always estimate, as Musgrove, that they'll be investing anywhere from $35 to $40 million to get that product registered. And right from day one, there is not a chance that we can go into that market without the regulatory expertise, without the investment, without the boots on the ground to really access that marketplace. When we look at what Bayer is potentially spending from R&D, market development, and then into the milestones, it is going to be between that $35 to $40 million mark, potentially through that period. And once we move to sales, once the product's registered after the registration process, that's when we'll move into more of a royalty and a cost plus on the active ingredient. So Bayer continues to move this forward, and I'll go through that a little bit later, but we're very excited about the first milestone. We're very excited to hit those technical advancements and really start driving this product to that next stage of registration and more market development, and really looking at working with them and excited to work with them in the next three to seven years. And then if you look at the size of that market, it is a significant opportunity for us right across Europe, Africa, and Middle East. And just a small amount of market share could generate a significant amount of dollars. And remember, Bayer would not be taking this forward if the product didn't work, if we weren't seeing efficacy, if they weren't able to get around some of these technical challenges and questions, but also they have to be profitable. And taking them and having them take this forward is very exciting for us.
Todd Lahti, Colin Bletsky, Todd Lahti, Corey Giasson to be able to have them manufacture that product and get it into the market in a timely manner so that we can move this company into positive cash flows and continue to grow it from there. But the U.S. is really key for us. We are also, as I mentioned before, supplementing or looking to supplement TerraSante sales in other markets potentially. This is going to take on-farm testing, which we're doing here right now. and with positive results and identifying an economic need for this product in the market, we'll be looking to do the initial ramp up just as what we've done in California, for instance, starting a few years ago now. In terms of our biocontrol, TerraMG in Canada and the US, not much has changed here. We continue to work with the EPA and the PMRA, but you will take note in our financial statements, in the income statement, that we are spending less and less on regulatory work. Part of it's a wait and see type of period, and part of it is that we want to also make sure that we're driving cash to be able to generate those sales of TerraSante. which again is going to get us the positive cash flows. And I won't comment any more on Bayer. Colin covered that very well in the last slide. In terms of our capital structure, we have 70 million shares outstanding, about 92 million fully diluted. We have seen this count grow over the last few years as we've raised some much needed capital. We're sitting in a very comfortable cash position right now. And I believe if we're able to execute on manufacturing and selling this product into the market in a timely manner, our goal is still that we'll be positive cash flows next year. Thank you for joining us today. We're also excited with some of the discussions we've had with some of these manufacturers is that not only do they want to be able to hit their targets right now in terms of production, but they want to continue to grow with us as we need more and more product in the future. So I think we've got some very good partners that we have in terms of manufacturing and I'm looking forward to us being able to hit those manufacturing numbers so that we can really start driving sales and work this company into positive cash flow and beyond. So with that Martin, that's the presentation and I'd like to open up to questions and answers.
All right, thank you, gentlemen. We will now take questions from the audience. We have received numerous by email already. Please submit questions into the question and answer window, and they will be addressed. First question, what kind of milestone was achieved for TerraMG with Bayer, and will there be a next milestone?
Yeah, so Martin, as I said, those were based on technical achievements and both technical on efficacy in field, but also on application. And one of the key criteria is not only about having a product that actually works, but it's having a product that can go through the typical farm systems that are used in that region. And when you look at what's happening in Italy and Spain with different types of equipment than some parts of the U.S., A big part of that milestone was based on those technical achievements. So on that, and then we're very hopeful and the potential milestone for 2027, we do believe we're well on our way for that milestone, but we also have to work through a lot of different meetings, a lot of different things with Bayer over the next course of the year.
I think you've addressed this already, but is there a realistic chance of achieving additional buyer-related milestones in 2027?
Yeah, and as I said, the potentials there and the opportunities there, I believe with the diligence that we're working with Bayer, hopefully within 2027, we'll see an additional milestone.
Can you quantify the current production capacity for TerraSante? Are the newly commissioned production lines already operating at full capacity?
Yeah, based on the existing lines that have been put in place, I estimate there could be potentially $15 to $25 million of Canadian dollars of product being produced at nameplate capacity. No, they're not operating currently at full capacity. We have seen improvements and I believe that we will get there.
Are you now able to fully meet customer demand or are you still experiencing periods of being sold out?
Yeah, we're still experiencing periods of being sold out. We have an existing PO that we need to go and deliver on. So we're waiting on some product. But our objective here is to fully meet customer demand and then be able to build up inventories specifically for the end of the year so that we can hit the beginning of Q1 hard with sales.
You mentioned additional production capacity in Canada. How is total TerraSante production capacity currently distributed between your facilities in Asia and Canada? And are all of them running dedicated for TerraSante?
Well, all of our production is currently out of Asia. We have two producers in Asia, one in Thailand, one in India. One of the facilities is 100% dedication to Terrasante. The other facility, I'd say, is about 80-90% dedication to Terrasante. They do need to produce another product for a month or two over a particular period of time. And I've taken that all into account in terms of the expected nameplate capacity. So for the one facility where we don't have 100% availability, I've taken into account the months that they will be down.
Are you scaling production based on actual customer purchase orders? in order to avoid building excess inventory?
Well, right now we're just trying to meet demand. Our whole goal is to... I mean, we will be carrying inventory in the future. If we can get our manufacturing up to a level, there will be inventory carried in the future, which, again, is a good thing because we have seen unexpected... Can you provide insight into Terrasante's seasonality and how demand would typically fluctuate throughout the year?
Yeah, and right now, Martin, so it is sold out or sold throughout the year, depending on the type of application method that's going on. There's pre-plant going on, but also in season applications. So when I look at the, I would say the two heavy areas would be Q4 and then Q1. Q4 typically would be around the strawberry, specifically strawberry and vegetable production in Southern US, specifically California. And then Q1 is also strawberries, other berries, but potatoes. And that's when you'd see potatoes come online, specifically in the Pacific Northwest. So as a U.S. as a whole right now, it is spread out across the entire year. But the bulk of it would be a Q4 slash Q1 heavy time frame, just based on the crop plantings.
How has demand for TerraSante developed compared to 2025? Are you seeing stronger order volumes from more repeat customers or expansion into new regions?
Yeah, and as Corey mentioned, and part of the, I guess, the release was the increase of over 40% already for Terrasante sales in 2026 versus full year 2025. Now, most of that product has actually gone to repeat customers. We have to satisfy those needs first. As Corey mentioned, we're still in a sold-out position, and as soon as we get product in, it is gone. So most of that is going to existing customers who are expanding acres. And as I always said, farmers will use a little bit and then continually expand over time. We have now branched out and are selling into some other new customers, which is great to expand that some more. But for the most part, the bulk of the sales are still coming out of strawberries, still coming out of California, and then also into potatoes. So those are the two main crops for us right now. But we have seen a lot of good growth with existing customers who have used the product now for in some cases one year, in some cases two years.
Are you selling directly to those farmers or is it being sold to distribution companies who then move it on to the farmer customers themselves?
Yeah, and we go through distribution. You need to work with the right professional agronomists and the right distribution chain to do so. And I could say we've been open about this, but we've had extremely strong support from Nutrien, specifically looking in that California region. They've been tremendous partners for us, driving that demand with their key customers. So everything we do in that sense is through distribution, and that's how we will continue to go forward.
Thank you for having me. This strawberry market, is that primarily California or is that in the southeast as well or other southern states?
California is the biggest driver of it right now. We are looking and driving some new field trials and testing in Florida. But the two key markets for strawberries would be California and into Florida. Once we look at potatoes, like I said, that's more northwest. And if you go into fruit and veg or other vegetables, that's still a very dominant California market.
How much improvement in gross margins do you expect now that you are transitioning from air freight to more economical ocean freight? And what are delivery times with ocean?
Yeah, so in terms of gross margin improvements, you know, in Q1, we had about 24% gross margin. I expect the CS going back to that 25 to 30, 40% range. It all depends on some of the costs such as ocean freight at the time. We have seen ocean freight rates spike up during the Iranian war. In terms of delivery times, we're looking at about six weeks on ocean freight.
So that 25-ish percent would be at full production capacity?
No, no, it's not at full production capacity, no.
What would, can you estimate what gross margins would be when you're running at full production?
Well, we've got... agreements with our partners in terms of the costs and purchase orders that we put in for the product. The more efficient that they get in terms of their production, and we've seen their efficiency starting to increase, it means that their costs are going to go down. And that's a good thing for them because with the low rates that they've been producing at, it could be quite costly for them in terms of their margins.
What are the next steps in the regulatory process for TerraMG and your other biocontrol technologies?
Yeah, well, in terms of the PMRA, I'll let Colin comment on that, but in terms of the EPA, in the US. We're in a wait and see period here right now. Again, we haven't been spending very much money there because we haven't had to. When we get an idea and a sense of where the EPA is at and what our next steps would be, we'll have to assess if it's going to cost more capital for us to do that. We'll have to assess, do we want to be driving capital there versus TerraSante sales? and um you know and if not well hopefully uh hopefully uh hopefully if not we don't have to spend any more money in this uh area uh you know we look forward to receiving our registration in terms of a timeline with the epa it's hard to say
Yeah, and Martin, in Canada, we are addressing one data need that we are putting forward this fall, and we hope to have that soon. And then with the European Union in Bayer's area, Bayer continually works towards that registration process across the EU27 and their other regions. And, you know, looking at other parts of the world, we continually assess other markets and seeing what would be the best route to market and with who in other areas, such as Asia, Latin America, etc.
When do you expect TerraSante to be available in Europe?
Yeah, as of right now, we are doing testing in Europe, specifically looking in flowers in the Netherlands. So we have to wait for that process and that data to come through before we can then make the next step of working with the right partner and the other partners. Flowers is not part of the Bayer Agreement. So we do have freedom to work in that area, and Netherlands being a very large opportunity. So it's going to depend on country, depending on the country, depending on the data, depending on the crop as well. But we're hopeful that we will be getting a lot of those answers here at the end of this, end of 2026, and then really figuring out the plan as to when for Terrasante and where else we'll go with it.
For TerraSante, you've gotten a lot of action from the potato and the strawberry markets. Are you working on research to validate the efficacy and value in other crops?
Yeah, we are. And so with TerraSante, with TerraMG, both of those products are crop agnostic. So we can work in many different crops. It all comes down to the dose, the timing, and the application. And the one difference between something like vegetables versus strawberries is the value at a farm gate level. So we have to then work through different doses. But we continually look leafy greens, tomatoes. We're looking in other berries, you know, even down to the point of looking into specific row crops as well, just to continue that expansion. But it all comes down to you need to get the right value at the right time for that farmer. And that's where we have to work through some of those key different metrics.
With over 100 patents in hand, could some of those be sold for cash?
Yeah, so I guess, you know, we have about 110 patents here right now. We think there's better value for us keeping these patents right now and moving our technologies into commercialization and scale up because there'll be a lot more value for those patents down the road as we execute on commercialization.
What level of exposure to U.S. tariffs do your customers in the U.S. have, and what, if any, impact do you expect them to have on a go-forward sales?
In terms of tariffs, so far, our product, as it sits here right now, Our product being a biofertility product coming out of Asia, we're not seeing any tariffs. But again, that could change at any time. Even if we were producing products here in Canada and exporting to the US, I believe being a biofertility product, it would be not under the new 50% tariffs that are expected here.
Has the EU changed their biopesticides approval times to be more of a fast-track process?
They talk about it, Martin, but they have not clarified or changed the registration or regulations in that sense yet. There are still, like I said, discussions about utilizing natural products like ours to drive that and go faster, but every regulatory body, I think, on this globe says that they want to be fast, but they never are. It just takes time. It's government, and that's something we just have to deal with.
What will your pricing policy be once production is meeting demand?
So in the marketplace right now for Terrasante, we are in a good sweet spot to drive that growth. It is a profitable product for us in that sense and in those areas. My mindset would be that we maintain our pricing, we maintain driving the value, showing the value at a farm gate level, and showing that value to the producers. Getting more product on the ground, getting more users, getting more turnover is going to benefit us and Todd Lahti. Continue to look, continue to adjust and look at the marketplace, see what's possible. But the first priority is to increase sales and get more product on the ground and get more users utilizing Terrasante so we can continue that growth curve.
Have you started the registration in more states?
As of right now, we have a number of different states and new ones that we just announced. There are a few key other states that I would like to get into just based on demand. But I would say first priority is to get the product placed and put into the marketplace as quickly as we can, number one. But number two is continue the growth curve in the key regions. And I would say those key regions would be Pacific Northwest, You said flowers are not part of the buyer agreement. Is TerraSante also covered in the buyer agreement? It is. Our technologies are covered in that buyer agreement. We will continue to work with Bayer to see how and where we would take Sarasante into the marketplace in those regions. But the first goal would be to get it into something like flowers where we have freedom to operate, show the demand, get the growth, get the data and drive that. Flowers are a tremendous value crop. And if you look at the Netherlands alone, there's roughly 28,000 hectares of flowers in the Netherlands. So it's a very large opportunity. So first is to focus on there. Second would be then to look at where else can we go with TerraSante and TerraMG with Bayer within their region and pick out those key countries.
Can you make a comment to the current share price?
Yeah, I mean, you know, we've seen our share price down over the last year or so. You know, we're shareholders in this company and it's not that we don't notice it, but we know how we can, you know, see appreciating share price, and that is going to be generating sales of TerraSante, moving the company into positive cash flows, showing the growth, and that's our focus. And that's where we're headed.
Does Bayer also support work on TerraSante already and is working towards registration? Or has all the work been on the TerraMG?
All the work with Bayer right now is on TerraMG. TerraSante is a potential upside for both organizations. I will be meeting with them coming up in October to go through potential next steps. When you look at a large agricultural chemical company like Bayer, having TerraMG in the marketplace first is something that's They want to do first and foremost. They do see TerraSante, though, as a potential upside, but we have to work through a number of different things with it to see the right place to right time and where it has a good fit.
Given they're both with the same core technology from the mustard seed, getting approval for the Terra MG, would that facilitate or potentially accelerate an approval process for TerraSante in Europe?
No, they are two separate products with separate claims, with separate formulations, separate targets. So the answer would be no. It's two different systems. The biocontrol system versus biofertility and biostimulant is different, but it does come down to a country-level discussion then with biofertility products. Thank you. There are no further questions.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining us everyone.