Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.

Good morning, my name is John and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Riley Exploration Permian Inc's 3rd quarter of 2020 for earnings conference call. All lines have been placed in mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Philip Riley, Chief Financial Officer. You may begin

your conference. Good morning. Welcome to our conference call covering the 3rd quarter 2024 results. I'm Philip Riley, CFO. Joining me today are Bobby Riley, Chairman and CEO, and John Suter, COO. Yesterday, we published a variety of materials which can be found on our website under the investors section. These materials in today's conference call contain certain projections and other forward looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. We'll also reference certain non-GAAP measures. The reconciliations to the appropriate GAAP measures can be found in our supplemental disclosure on our website. I'll now turn the call over to Bobby.

Thank you, Philip. Good morning and welcome to our Q3 2024 earnings call. Today, we highlight several updates for Riley since Q2, including that our team met or exceeded key metrics on our planned guidance, resulting in significant free cash flow. This has allowed us to continue paying down debt and distributing dividends back to our shareholders. Today, we're paying our 15th consecutive dividend as a public company with a recent increase to 38 cents per share, up 6% from previous quarter. Since 2021, we've returned $98 million to public shareholders, achieving an annual dividend growth rate of 11%. Additionally, we paid down $35 million in debt this quarter, underscoring our commitment to delivering consistent and growing shareholder returns while maintaining prudent financial management. I'm happy to report that our 2024 drilling and completion campaign is delivering excellent results. We are successfully driving down costs while generally seeing production outperform relative to forecast and prior year results in both West Texas and New Mexico. This reinforces the effectiveness of our operational strategies and strengthens our ability to generate value. This success also underscores the quality of our acquisitions and highlights new opportunities to invest in infrastructure that will support future growth. Just as we did early on in our Texas, our champions asset, we plan to take advantage of these opportunities beginning in Q4 and the future to build out infrastructure that will enhance transportation and processing, providing reliable continuous takeaway, ensuring we are well positioned to maximize efficiency and long-term value in both regions. We believe Riley's all-focus assets to be among the most productive and capital efficient in North America. As we demonstrate in new slides in our investor presentation, using data and analysis from Dr. John and Veras, a top data provider for our industry, one can see how our assets compare favorably to core Midland Basin and Delaware Basin wells, outperforming both on longer term cumulative production per lateral foot metrics and forecasted break-even prices. Since the fall of 2022, we've been operating a CO2 pilot in a small footprint area that consisted of six vertical wells and three horizontal wells. The data gathered from this pilot showed that we were successful in mobilizing hydrocarbons, both oil and NGLs, with CO2. This provides valuable insights for potential EOR applications, which we believe will be best suited for post-primary production later in the reservoir's life. We will continue to evaluate anthropogenic CO2 sources that will be crucial in the economic outcome. We made significant progress with our power joint venture, RPC Power, across both projects. In Yocum County, we completed the final installation of power units supporting our operations and are actively transferring load to these units. For our larger merchant project, we advanced with siting, permitting, and equipment orders, positioning us well for continued development. Now I will turn the call over to John Suter, our COO, to discuss operational results for the quarter, followed by Philip Riley, our CFO, who will discuss financial results and guidance.

Thank you, Bobby, and good morning. Once again, Riley demonstrated excellence in operations through safe operating practices. The team achieved a total recordable incident rate of zero for Q3 and EOR to date. We achieved 91 percent safe days in the quarter, a metric requiring no recordable incidents, vehicle accidents, or spills over 10 barrels. Thanks to our team for their continued focus on these efforts. In Q3 of 2024, we drilled 12, completed 3, and turned in line 6 gross operated wells. The additional wells turned in line are carried over from Q2 completion activity. The 9 ducts generated in Q3 will provide our completions for the remainder of 2024 and give us a healthy start to our 2025 program. As Bobby mentioned, our 2024 drilling and completion campaign continues to drive down costs through efficiencies and economies of scale from pad drilling and continuous drilling operations. This has been achieved through optimization of drilling practices, pad drilling, geo-steering efficiencies, and zipper fracks. We've increased both our feet per day and lateral feet per day by 33 percent and 20 percent in 2024 year to date relative to 2023 respectively. We've also set records for drilling in Yocum County for fastest 1-mile lateral at 3.97 days spud to TD and fastest .5-mile lateral at 4.78 days spud to TD. Net production grew from 1.34 to 1.42 million barrels of oil quarter over quarter, an increase of 6 percent, while equivalent production is up 11 percent from 1.94 to 2.16 million barrels of oil equivalent. Our average daily net production was 23.42 NBOE per day for this quarter. We continue to make steady progress in increasing the off-take of associated gas. Much of this is driven by enhancements from our midstream provider alongside us. These efforts allowed us to send 42 percent more of our gas produced to sales compared to the previous quarter. The team successfully implemented our New Mexico plans in the third quarter, including completing our first two Red Lake wells with nine more planned to be drilled this year. We purposely back-loaded our Red Lake development to avoid costly rig moves between states. Initial production of these completed wells meets or exceeds expectations for the area. The additional wells will provide valuable opportunities to test completion methodologies and well spacing to continue to improve results on future wells in the asset. Lease operating expenses were $8.60 per BOE within 1 percent of last quarter and down 7 percent versus the same quarter last year. With the inclusion of vertical production in our New Mexico asset, absolute LOE has increased slightly, offset though by an increase in total equivalent production. We're continuing to look at options to drive down LOE costs, particularly on our vertical wells. This includes but is not limited to leveraging software and other technology to help manage, optimize, and even automate artificial lift changes. In the fourth quarter of this year, we will begin construction of a gathering and compression system in our New Mexico asset to better control our gas takeaway and allow for our optionality in the future. This infrastructure accounts for roughly $12 million of capital spend within the fourth quarter and will allow gathering and compression of our 2025 drilling program wells as well as much of our existing gas production. As for power, we supported approximately 50 percent of our electrical load in Texas with self-generated power in the third quarter. We'll continue to transition to a larger majority of self-generated power as we bring on more production within the generation footprint. I'll now turn the call over to Philip to discuss Q3 financial results and guidance.

Thank you, John. Third quarter of 2024, operating cash flow was 72.1 million or 60.5 million before changes in capital. The increase was driven by higher oil production volumes, lower total unit costs, improved hedge settlements, and lower income tax payments partially offset by a 12 percent decline in average realized prices, including higher gas sales volumes and negative realized prices. We reinvested 50 percent of operating cash flow before working capital changes into upstream capex on an accrual basis and 38 percent on a cash capex basis. Hence, we converted 62 percent of that cash flow to 38 million of free cash flow. That repeats approximately the record level set last quarter despite the significantly lower prices this quarter. Year to date, we've converted 56 percent of operating cash flow before working capital changes to 99 million of free cash flow or 133 million of free cash flow for the last 12 months. So, we're reinvesting less than half our after-tax cash flow and still growing production volumes, but more importantly, growing our free cash flow. We believe this combination of lower spending with higher volumes and free cash flow is a useful indicator of asset quality and capital efficiency. The 99 million of free cash flow this year is 2.7 times the amount, the same metric, I mean, through the first nine months of 2023. And the 133 million of last 12 months free cash flow corresponds with approximately 21 percent yield on our equity value as of the close yesterday, even after the 8 percent one-day increase in the stock price. Generating significant free cash flow while still investing for growth has been a key objective for our team and our company this year, and we're proud to be delivering on the objectives. Operating income this quarter was impacted by the impairment related to the EO-R project discontinuation, most of which was non-cash. On a go-forward basis, we'll save approximately $3 million per year on avoided CO2 costs, which I'll note was previously capitalized not in OPEX, but it will increase free cash flow going forward. Net income was down by 24 percent or $8 million -over-quarter as gains on commodity hedges, about 23 million unrealized and 1 million realized, absorbed some of the reduction from the impairment. Adjusted net income, which excludes the impact of the impairment and the hedging gains, was down by 5 percent -over-quarter. We reduced the principal value of debt by $35 million this quarter to $300 million. Debt to total enterprise value at quarter end was 34 percent, with 1.07 times debt to LTM adjusted EBITDAX. The credit facility utilization is now 35 percent, down from 65 percent a year ago, and total debt has been reduced by $100 million over the past year. We'll look to pursue a normal course extension on the credit facility by early in the new year. The book value of shareholders' equity increased to $507 million or $24 per share based on 21.5 million shares outstanding. The dividend in the third quarter accounted for $8 million or 22 percent of free cash flow. The final allocation of capital in the third quarter was $1.5 million contributed to the PowerJV. Moving on to guidance. At the beginning of the year, we announced our annual plan, which called for 10 percent -over-year oil volume growth while cutting capital spending by 10 percent. Our current full-year guidance range, based on three quarters of actuals plus one quarter of guidance for the fourth quarter, calls for increasing full-year 2024 oil production by 14 to 15 percent over full-year 2023 production. Our guidance range for fourth quarter 24 exit rate is up by 14 to 19 percent over fourth quarter 23 levels. Approximately 85 percent of annual oil volume growth can be attributed to organic development funded by CapEx, with 15 percent attributed to the bolt-on acquisition earlier in the year, which is not an original plan. Adjusting to exclude for the acquisition for illustrative purposes, we'd still be at 12 to 13 percent annual oil growth, so still beating our original goal. Fourth quarter OPEX and overhead cost guidance ranges were both reduced from prior quarter levels, primarily owing to improvements experienced in the third quarter and, to a lesser extent, to the benefit of the increased gas sales volumes, which has the effect of increasing the denominator on unit cost metrics. Our fourth quarter CapEx range implies a -over-year reduction of 20 percent using low end or 12 percent using the high end of spending. Our full-year CapEx range did increase from last quarter on account of the gas compression project that John discussed, which will have longer-term benefits. Adjusting to exclude for that new compression project for illustrative purposes, as we didn't see last year, we're still at a 9 percent annual CapEx reduction from last year, yet still achieving organic growth. Back to you, Bobby, for closing. Thank you.

Thank you, Philip. Once again, we appreciate your time and interest in our company. We're pleased with our recent performance, and while we believe these quarterly results are strong, we remind investors that we are primarily focused on long-term results and value creation. We remain confident that our strategic focus and operational excellence will continue to drive growth and profitability for our shareholders over the long term. Operator, you may now turn the call over for questions.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star one again. Thank you. We'll pause for a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Neil Dingman with Truria Securities. Please go ahead.

Morning, guys. My first question on the capital efficiency and your upcoming BFC plan specifically. You all seem to continue to do more with less, as certainly notable by your slide five. I'm just wondering, when looking at next year, is the plan still to maintain around similar growth and how would a 60 versus $80 environment affect your plans?

Right. Good morning. Thanks, Neil.

Yeah. So we're not providing guidance now for the 2025, as you saw. We haven't historically done that now. We typically do it early in the same year. We can offer a few things. So we've got a multi-year track record of growth through development and simply turning the calendar shouldn't materially alter our strategy. This year, we aim for 10% growth and it looks like we may achieve even more than that on account of the incremental gains we made each quarter. 2025 might look similar. You know, we might keep making those small gains each quarter. You know, similar to this time last year, the macro backdrop is pretty volatile. We've got fairly loose crude supply and demand balances, large amount of OPEC spare capacity, large non-OPEC growth areas in places like Guyana, we've got weakness in China. So we're watching that. Of course, we've got the optimism here domestically with some more growth outlook post-election, but we're all still processing that as the team and with the board. You know, on the price volatility, I think that would probably affect us maybe less than some companies. We're hedged ballpark 40% on total oil production next year, maybe 65, 70% on PTP. And of that, swaps is about 30%, maybe in the 73, $74 above the current strip. That gives us some cushion. And then you've got about 70% in collars at 63 to kind of mid-70s pricing. So that gives us some protection and mitigates some of that volatility. And I don't think that we'll be one to make big changes, certainly at the $80 level. If things are at 60, then, you know, maybe we have a little bit less growth. But as you started with the question, we're able to do more with less. We've got some capital-efficient assets, so I think we might do a tiny bit less there with the – with quite a low price, but don't see a problem in keeping production

flat there. Yeah, that's what I thought. Thanks, Philip. And then just secondly, on the – again, to help ask on the Power Focus JV, specifically maybe could you describe any potential upside, you know, next several quarters and maybe more specifically sort of significant data points we should be looking for in the next few quarters?

Yeah, it's a fair question, and we're looking for the right way to do this. We recognize most of you are upstream analysts, and this is a bit of a new foray. So, you know, we've got two phases here. The first phase is effectively a -the-meter project to power our own operations. That's installed, as Bobby noted. The load is being transferred over more and more. That's going to be an easier business to forecast, and we'll give some guidance soon on that. But that, we hope, is like a mid-teens type of capital return, and we've invested a little over $30 million in that to date. And then we've got this second project, which is the sale to ERCOT, and we're making great progress. RPC is making great progress there. That's the larger one with generation of power and the services, the backup cancel later services. And so they're making great progress permitting and obtaining surface acreage, executing interconnection agreements, and so forth. We're actually not showing material equity contributions this quarter to the JV. Some of those items have contingent payments after the certain milestones are hit. And then we also have some line of sight on some project financing and some construction financing options, which could provide another funding option. And so I just want to encourage you, we are making quite a bit of progress there quickly. We've got projects scheduled to come on mid-year on that second phase, mid-year next year. We're currently seeing a higher potential return there. That's tough for business to forecast, though, with how power prices trade. They trade every 15 minutes in the day ahead market, and you've got wide volatility. We see potential to make money even at lower prices. We've got a favorable setup with low gas prices out in the Permian, and that's part of the thesis there is that this allows for an implicit hedge on our kind of lower gas price there. And we're happy with selling power at those lowest prices, and we can also enjoy the upside on the gas if that should ever materialize. But we appreciate your patience. We'll be providing more information soon.

I look forward to it. Thanks,

Philip. Your next question comes from the line of John White, the trust capital. Please go ahead.

Good morning and congratulations on a very fine quarter.

Thank you, John.

In your 4Q guidance, you've got a line item, infrastructure in the range of 14 to 21 million. I believe your COO touched on this in his comments, but I was wondering if you could provide some more detail.

Sure. Yeah, just as Bobby mentioned earlier, we found value in making key infrastructure investments and champions that has been delivering long-term value in that development. Our Red Lake asset has the same opportunity. So a reasonably large compressor station installation and associated gathering system on the west side of the Pecos River will help us deliver our 2025 development program volumes along with much of the existing gas to sales in a much more reliable manner than would likely not be possible on the existing low-pressure network that's mostly full. So this station will give us more future optionality to various gas processors in the future if needed, different gas markets as we spend significant development drilling dollars in the next five to seven years. We want to make sure and have the optimal situation there.

Thanks for the extra detail. I appreciate it and I'll pass the call back to the operator.

Thank you. Your next question comes from Jeff Robertson with Water Tower Research. Please go ahead.

Thank you. John, just to follow up on the compression system at Red Lake, am I right in thinking that that system will allow for more continuous operation or both that would obviously benefit in gas take away, but also there'd be a benefit on oil production?

Yes, absolutely. We'll be able to compress some of these new wells to the high-pressure system that again we believe is much more reliable from a downtime situation. Certainly it's going to let us get access to that capacity which in turn we produce more gas, that allows us to produce more oil. So I think it'll be kind of a key item in our 2025 development program on the Red Lake side.

Will it be a net positive too from an operating cost standpoint?

Yeah, it should be. There'll be, you know, where we might have been paying fees for some of that. We'll do the installation, but then we'll get a discount on likely on some of those fees that we would normally pay somebody else.

And then back in at Champions, with the power, I think you said you're 50% self-generated in the third quarter. Will you be 100% at some point in the near future or close to 100%?

I think it's going to be a little bit slower than that. There'll be a gradual build as, you know, the whole field is not tied to that, all of that network yet. But as we bring on new drilling programs, kind of expand the footprint of our grid, we'll certainly get there in the next couple years, I would imagine. But for now, we'll just be adding on each drilling program wells as we go.

Am I right in thinking that the economic benefit of that is, number one, lower power costs, but also more reliable power that supports maybe less unscheduled downtime and allows you to produce more oil than you might if you had to rely on the existing grid?

Yes, I would say it's less of a power savings from an operational perspective. But what it does do is provide this great benefit in, you're right, like you mentioned, consistency with less downtime. You know, I think in the time past, you know, we had issues with brownouts being at kind of the end of the electric system grid there. So this gives us a lot more control over the situation, lets us, you know, produce our wells more of the time and, you know, control our downtime on those ESPs, which is not good. And so I think, you know, that can save a lot of money just in future workovers of whenever something drops and stays down for a while. So we're excited about it. The unit costs should go down over time as we add more and more power to the installation. So we're excited about it.

Lastly, Phillip, I know you said that the CO2 costs were being capitalized at the pilot, but will discontinuing the pilot have any other impacts on the on the portion of operating costs that were being expensed related to that pilot?

No, they really won't on the expense. It's that avoided CO2 contract cost, which is roughly $3 million a year. You know, implicitly we could see some production return, which and potentially a little bit less power usage there with less compressors being run, less water flowing through there and such.

So maybe

some mild stuff, but not significant on the OpEx. Thank you.

Your next question comes from Line of Noble Parks with 2B Brothers. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Just

sort of piggybacking on some of the discussion about the PowerJV, if you could just sort of walk me through. So if we sort of head to the opposite scenario of much stronger nat gas prices, which is a high quality problem to have, how would that sort of ripple through the couple of different projects you have on the power side in terms of economics and advantages you that low gas provides that would then shift?

Yeah, that's a fair question, Noel. So first and foremost, in a higher gas price scenario, we all have to remember if we're talking higher Henry Hub and NYMEX or are we truly talking higher West Texas, Waha, Plainspool and such, which often have a significant negative basis differential like they did this quarter. So we are still a long way from say $3, $4, $5 realized gas out there post basis differential. But on our on our base load project, we are taking that gas in kind. So instead of selling it to the market, we're taking it in kind or sorry, RPC, the JV is taking that in kind. So that acts as a feedstock. We have a certain price there that's it would be a material discount to that market price effectively. And then over on the merchant deal, it's going to be bought and sold at a market clearing price. And what we take comfort there in there is the strong historical correlation between the marginal price of gas in in in setting power prices. There can be some disconnects, of course, in the middle of a sunny California weather type day if it's 65 and sunny and windy, you're going to have lower power prices. But what we're seeing is the retirements of the traditional coal and even larger net gas is outpacing that renewable addition. And especially in the face of all the surge of power demand from general Texas economy growth, oilfield growth out in West Texas, oilfield town growth, and then, of course, all of this technology boom and such in the talk of AI data centers and such. So the dynamics are still good for us. And we're excited about the prospect.

Great. Thanks, Todd. Really interesting. And earlier in the call, you were talking about just the success you've seen with the efficiencies. And you mentioned pad drilling, geosteering, zipper fracks. I was just wondering the results from those. Anything I don't imagine necessarily anything you've seen that's been an out and out surprise. I just wonder if there's any implications for maybe localized success you had with some of the techniques that might be applicable to a wider part of the inventory.

Yeah, great question. And I think you're absolutely right. What we are doing is really we have great rock to start with. We've been seeing that. But now we've been able to get the same level of production results just with cheaper costs. Again, our New Mexico asset especially is well set up for pad drilling. We're testing the spacing on a lot of things there now. But I think it's really more of just continued improvement the way I see it. I mean, again, with the zipper fracks, we're getting better, better sand placement. You know, certainly we've had some unexpected improvement on some wells, but we tend to just have, you know, really good tight curve results that we're pleased with. And again, we've just put ourselves in a great position with the asset quality we have and are just performing and executing well. But I wouldn't say there's any transformative ideas. It's just basic blocking and tackling using all the industry methods at our disposal. It's working well.

Great. Thanks a lot. As there are no further questions at this time, that concludes our Q&A session in today's conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect. Have a pleasant day, everyone.