This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk01: Okay, and thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Sierra Metals First Quarter 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 1 on your telephone. If you should require any further assistance, please press star 0. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker for today, Mr. Mike McAllister, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you, sir. Please go ahead.
spk08: Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Sierra Metals' first quarter 2021 results conference call. On today's call, we are joined by Luis Marchese, our CEO, Ed DeMaris, our CFO, We are assuming that all published materials have been read, and as such, today's presentation highlights the key issues of the quarter. However, I would like to highlight that, as always, we are open for questions at the end of the presentation, which can expand upon other issues that might be of interest to those listening. The accompanying presentation for today's call is available for download through the webcast or from the company's website at sierrametals.com. Yesterday's press release, the financial statements, and the management discussion and analysis are also posted on the company's website. Before I turn the call over to Luis, I would like to indicate that this earnings call contains forward-looking information that is based on the company's current expectations, estimates, and beliefs. This forward-looking information is subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors. Actual results could differ materially from our conclusions, forecasts, or projections as reflected in the forward-looking information. Additional information about the material factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from conclusions, forecasts, or projections in the forward-looking information and the material factors or assumptions that were applied in drawing a conclusion or making a forecast or projection as reflected in the forward-looking information is contained in the company's annual information form, which is publicly available on CDAR or EDGAR via Form 40F or on the company's website. Please note that all dollar amounts mentioned on today's call are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. I would now like to turn the call over to Luis Marchese, our CEO, for the first quarter highlights and the company outlook, and then to Edgar Maris, to our CFO, for the financial highlights. Please go ahead, Luis.
spk04: Thanks, Mike. Good morning, everyone. Turning now to slide four. Well, I would like to start by stating that, above all, the safety of our workers and the communities in which we operate remains paramount to the company. COVID-19 has imposed various direct and indirect challenges to the company and management, which have affected our ability to operate as effectively as expected in 2020 and continuing into 2021. Impacts have included delays in mine development and preparation of areas for mining, and consequently, lower head grades as we focus on larger and with lower grade ore bodies as we strive to meet that. This has resulted in lower metal cells resulting from lower grades. Costs were also affected mainly due to indirect fixed costs, which still must be incurred despite lower metals production. That said, we continue to take proactive measures to mitigate potential impacts that COVID-19 may have on our employees, communities, operations, supply chains, and our finance. We continue to test and quarantine employees before they can join the active workforce and continue to monitor all employees daily. Further, we're also deferring time exploration and capital projects due to ongoing and carry forward difficulties for 2020. Additionally, our Cusi mine was also affected by a large-scale power outage that affected Texas and parts of northern Mexico, which caused lost production during an approximately 10-day period and continued instability in the power grid of northern Mexico, which has also brought some other production difficulties for the next few months. However, despite the challenges we faced, the company still had solid revenue and adjusted EBITDA and maintained positive free cash flow. Furthermore, while we are facing challenges from COVID-19 currently, the midterm plans remain in place. Looking ahead to 2021, in 2021, please turn to slide five. Despite the challenges we're currently facing, we continue to see strong growth opportunities for the company as the operations in Mexico are on their way to running at their increased capacities of 5,000 tons per day at Bolívar and 1,100 tons per day at Cusi. Furthermore, we recently received an ITS environmental permit for the agriculture. I expect to receive the final ITM permit which is the operational permit by the end of Q2 2021. This will see Yaburicocha increase permitted throughput by 20% to 3,600 tons per day. This will allow us to make better use of the already installed capacity and Yaburicocha. At Yaburicocha, we continue to complete drilling to grow our mineral reserves and resources and complete the development work requiring operations to increase throughput in the future. We expect these capital expenditure projects will result in future increased cash flows and lower cash costs. Additionally, we expect to fund these capital expenditure programs through the innovation of operating cash flows. At Bolívar and Cusi, like Yabricocha, we are continuing with mineral exploration programs and completing infrastructure and operational improvements to double throughput in the future. These improvements include an expanded tailings facility at both mines and driving an underground tunnel that will connect the mines with the concentrator plant at Bolívar to improve efficiencies and reduce haulage costs. Additionally, at Bolívar, we expect to commence construction of an iron ore processing plant in June, which is expected to produce approximately 500,000 tons per year of 62% iron ore This is expected to enhance Bolivar's profitability while also lowering our transportation and tailings development costs. This is a project that was approved recently by our board. We continue to work on the completion of the previous stability studies for the three mines, which build upon the previous preliminary economic assessments completed at all three mines. They study the expansion of the Yabicocha mines throughput to 5,500 tons per day and a doubling of throughput capacity at the Bolivar and Cusi mines to 10,000 and 2,400 tons per day respectively. In conclusion, on slide seven, the company has had a relatively decent first quarter Despite the direct and indirect, I would say, receivable challenges we face from the COVID-19 pandemic, we were still able to emerge with a stronger balance sheet and cash position. While we continue to operate in a vulnerable environment due to COVID-19, we remain hopeful. We expect further cash flow and liquidity improvements in 2021, a benefit of improving production and metal prices. The company has made the necessary capital investments and infrastructure improvements to continue growing, production, and improving costs. We remain committed to the company's prudent and sustainable growth, and more importantly, to improving the per share value benefiting all shareholders. With that, I will now turn the call over to Ed for the first quarter financial highlights. Ed.
spk09: Thank you, Luis, and good morning, everyone. Turning now to slide six, the company had a relatively good first quarter despite the COVID-19 related operational challenges. We reported a 4.5% increase to our consolidated throughput and generated EBITDA of 25 million. We also reported positive free cash flow and net income and we finished the quarter with approximately $74.3 million in cash. These relatively solid results are the product of evolving optimized operations and expansions ramp up, despite the effects of COVID-19, providing solid financial and operational performances, which we expect to continue as we progress into 2021. Our revenue mix by metal, continues to be led by copper, followed by silver and zinc. While we have seen the copper portion reduced in Q1 due to previously disclosed factors, it is expected to continue to take a leading role in the company's metal mix of production and revenue. In Q1 2021, we saw an improvement in all realized metal prices. Copper continued to improve at the end of 2020 and into Q1 2021 and remains strong currently. I believe today it's $4.70 a pound. Precious metals and zinc have also remained relatively strong in Q1 2021. Turning now to slide seven. Compared to the same period in 2019, Cash costs were higher at both Yauti Kocha and Bolivar, attributable to lower metal production due to lower head grades from reduced tonnage contributions from higher grade zones and bad weather at Bolivar in the early part of Q1. At Kusi, cash costs were lower during the quarter due to the 23% increase in silver equivalent payable ounces sold. However, all-in sustaining costs per silver equivalent payable ounce was in line with Q1 2020 as higher sustaining capital offset the impact of the increase in silver equivalent payable ounces. Turning now to slide eight, we finished the quarter with $74.3 million and have total net debt of approximately $25 million. The company continues to have a strong balance sheet, working capital, and cash position to support capital expenditures and growth initiatives. Management remains committed to the company's prudent and sustainable growth plan, and more importantly, improving the per share value benefiting all shareholders. With that, I will now turn the call back over to Mike.
spk08: Mike? Thanks, Ed. That ends the presentation portion of this call. As previously mentioned, we are open to discussing other topics of interest that shareholders may have. We would now like to open the calls to questions from participants. Operator, please open the line.
spk01: Ladies and gentlemen, just as a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, please press star and then the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from the line of Mark Reichman with Noble Capital Markets.
spk06: Mark Reichman Good morning. So, the first question is, as Luis probably addressed some of this in his commentary, but I wanted to ask just what exactly needs to happen and when do you expect to see great improvements at Yurikocha and Bolivar?
spk04: Luis Garcia Thanks, Mark. Thanks for the question. I mean, what has happened at both mines, Mark, is that we've been with the COVID situation for over a year now, and we have been, over time, prioritizing development and mining to make sure that we have the tonnage to feed the plant. In that process, we have been prioritizing larger ore bodies, although with lower grades, okay? So we are now, and we've had in the first quarter, the effect of this prioritization. Otherwise, we wouldn't have met the challenge. As we speak, we are in the process of trying to catch up back on the development and reaching these higher-grade areas so we can have better results in terms of metal production. Having said that, I just want to highlight that the situation in Peru and Mexico in terms of COVID is quite different from other parts of the world where, due to vaccination, the pandemic seems to be receded. We are still in the middle of the second wave and only around two or 3% of the population has been vaccinated. The government is starting to roll out vaccination for the over 70 year old people this week. So we are still a way ahead from going over the situation. And this is having issues, this is presenting issues in terms of what we can do at the moment. uh certainly we expect these to hopefully to finish by the end of the year when mass amounts of vaccines could be getting into the country so in the meantime we are adding more contractors reaching to more people and trying to go back into our our development that is required so i would expect that in the next coming months we will start seeing the results of that. In Mexico, we feel that we are starting to get into better areas as we speak. So we could see that sooner. But although the team is struggling with some residual effects from COVID.
spk06: So is it fair to say when comparing first quarter production actuals to the guidance range, I mean, it doesn't seem like it should be too much of a stress to achieve the low end of the range, but your ability to gain ground during the remainder of the year, that will in part be driven by, you know, the trajectory of the impact of COVID. Is that the way to kind of think about it?
spk04: Yes, yes.
spk06: I think that summarizes it. I've got a couple more questions, but I think I'll just go back into the queue and follow up with them later.
spk04: Okay.
spk06: Thank you, Mark.
spk01: Your next question comes from the line of Alex Hunchuk with CIBC.
spk07: Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions. I was also going to ask on the guidance, so it looks like you guys have sort of answered that one. But maybe switching to the exploration at Yorikocha, some nice results out there. Is that something that you guys can add to the resources this year, or is it going to take a bit more drilling than that? And when can we maybe see some of that new zone in the actual mine plan?
spk04: Thanks, Chris, for that question, Alex. Yes, the areas that we've We started driving what we call the cruceros in Comil last year to look into this one to one and a half kilometer stretch with the Esperanza and Cachicachi and start putting some exploration spots there. As a result of that, we have found some continuity right next to the north of Esperanza. That's where we announced the marketing and press release. So this is fairly close to where we are. So the next step is that we are going to do some infield drilling and also a bit of pressing up and down to see how far these findings go. And this should take us to add resources this year, and eventually even mine there. So these are very good news. It's very close to where we are operating. and it should help us to reach better resources for this year.
spk07: Okay, great. Thank you for that. And then maybe, could you also just give a comment maybe on the political situation in Peru and how that might impact your culture going forward? I know it's a bit uncertain still, but how are you guys viewing that going forward?
spk04: Yeah, well... Mining is very important in Peru. It's 10 percent of the GDP, 18 percent of the taxes, 40 whatever percent of the exports of the country. So it's the elephant in the room in terms of the economy, and it always comes as a topic of discussion in every presidential election. So this is the case now. We have two candidates, one Keiko Fujimori and the other Pedro Castillo. They have also addressed their initiatives around mining and their impact on the country and their view. There are discussions our government take about redistributing the benefits of the mining revenues into the population and the rest. Having said that, So there is a, if for the initiatives to move forward, they will have to go through Congress and through a strong debate. Keep in mind that the Congress has already been elected, and none of the two candidates have a majority. They have minorities in Congress. So any decision-making in terms of anything, but in particular to mining, which is what we're discussing, would have to go through Congress and through a good debate. We are now, as you said, in the middle of the campaign, so it's a bit uncertain, you know, how campaigns are. So let's wait for the result and see what comes out of this, and then eventually we will engage The industry will have to engage in a conversation together with the political actors. Okay.
spk07: That's a good synopsis. Thank you. Yeah, that's it for me. Thanks, guys. Thank you, Ali.
spk01: Your next question comes from the line of Lee Cooperman with Omega Family Office.
spk02: Thank you. Let me just say this, that I am incredulous that you guys do not voluntarily say something about the strategic review process, which was ballyhooed as a big deal in early January. So, what can you say to update us about the strategic review process?
spk04: Thank you, Mr. Guberman. Thank you for the question. Okay. What I can say is that the strategic review process has also been affected by these unusual times, and it's taking a bit longer than we had expected because of the restrictions on pretty much anything we do now.
spk02: MR. When do you think that you'll have something to say? I'm not asking you what you're going to say, but when do you think you'll conclude the process, if you had a guess?
spk04: It's difficult to tell, but certainly we are working on it consistently, and we expect this to happen in the next few months and hopefully come back to the market with good results from this process.
spk02: All right. Second question. If the process doesn't yield an attractive enough price – see, I happen to come from the vantage point your stock is significantly mispriced. Year-to-date, to give you an example, Freeport Carbon Gold is up 67%. Despite your putting a for-sale sign, the company – your stock is only up 13% year-to-date. But if the strategic review process does not provide a price that's attractive, how much debt is the company willing to carry? Because I think we could recapitalize the company at a very favorable price. In other words, I look at the, you know, you look at your EBITDA forecast this year and look at the tonnage that you're projecting for the next couple of years, I assume your earnings will grow quite substantially if prices stay at these levels. but is the company prepared to take on debt to buy back stock, or is the company uncomfortable doing that?
spk04: Thank you. Thank you for the question. Mike, maybe Mike can comment on the market situation and the comparison that you just made, and then we can comment on the scenario that you are
spk08: Yeah, so the only thing I would say there is, you know, yes, Lee, if you compare us to Freeport, then we're down. But it's not really an apples-to-apples comparison. Freeport is more of a pure copper play. We're a diversified producer. If you look at us compared to, like, Hud Bay or some other, you know, base metal comparables, we're pretty much in line. With iron ore, we're doing better. And silver piers, we're doing good against them as well on a mid-tier level. So, you know, while I hear you on the creep word, we're not a major yet. It's a little ways off. So it's not really a fair comparison to that. We're more of a major player.
spk02: Well, what I would observe is none of these companies you're mentioning have put themselves up for sale. Generally speaking, when a company puts itself up for sale, you get a premium because people anticipate a favorable outcome. And I am not interested in selling the company at a discounted price. So when I look at the enterprise value of the company and I look at our free cash flow, it seems to me that we could create a lot of value for the shareholders by recapping the company. In other words, for example, if EBITDA was a couple hundred million, which I think will be next year, and you had debt to EBITDA, say, two times, that's $400 million, plus you'll be in a net cash position. That's two-thirds of the market cap of the company. You know, so it seems to me very exciting that, you know, we can make our own luck. But anyway, I just plant that seed. Am I right in assuming that you're still staying with guidance, which is that at current spot prices, EBITDA this year, 170 to 185, and consensus prices, 155 to 170. Is that still your guidance?
spk09: Thank you. Yes. Yes, it's still our guidance.
spk02: Okay, good. Okay. And I assume that you would anticipate, if I said to you prices would remain at current levels, which is the big assumption, that we would earn more money in 2022 and 2023 than we're earning currently? That's correct. okay uh good okay and tell me about the iron ore project which is going to take up uh you know a fair amount of capex uh what what what is the return on that capex likely to look like or the profitability of the iron ore business uh we're going to thanks for that question we're very excited about that that project which we are bringing into construction now
spk04: We are going to release the economics in the next few weeks. We should pay for Bolivar, including that project. So I cannot preempt the economics, but I can tell you some characteristics about this project. We are going to do it at a very reduced capital intensity. We're going to spend, as you see in the press release, $28 million for half a million tons of If you compare us with the capex intensity of any other IROGOR project in the market, we are in the low end. On the other hand, in terms of operating costs, Bolivar is very fortunate that we have a railroad line only 50 miles from the mine. While if you have an IROGOR project anywhere inland in the world, usually building infrastructure becomes a major hurdle and a major issue in terms of capex. We don't have that because we have the train available and also we have in Mexico one port which is the closest one to our operation that has space and facilities and infrastructure to manage the production that we are going to bring from the magnetic. On the other hand, we have quite a good stockpile of ore that we're going to process through these new facilities, and these will drive our own cash operating costs at the mine to the low end. So now our challenge is to bring these to operations as soon as possible, and then we're going to add value from our ore resources. So in top of our current metals mix, which is, I think, extremely strong, because we have, you know, as you are aware, copper, silver, zinc, and the rest, we are going to add iron ore. So Sierra Metals is going to pretty much become an example of the right metals mix for the future.
spk02: MR. Yeah. You don't want to answer the question for a few more weeks, but by and large, you have the answer, because you would have not gone ahead and approved the CapEx of $28 million without doing the analysis. Is that correct? Absolutely. We have to follow the regulations. Well, this is an open mic. You know, you have this open to the public, right? So whatever. I don't want to go down that path. Do you expect to end the year with more cash than you have presently? In other words, you have $175 million. Let's say I'm using a Zibida. We have CapEx of, what, $106 million. How much of that $106 million has already been spent this year? How much additional spending are we looking at? Have you spent any money this year yet of the $106 million?
spk09: Yes, we have. And we're a little bit behind in Q1. We're about $10 million from what we said in terms of annualized, if you were to take the quarter and annualize that. But to answer your question, yeah, we expect there to be a positive free cash flow and add-on to the cash balances.
spk02: Yes. I would expect that you would end the year debt-free, you know, if you took your cash minus your debt, that you would be debt-free. Is that a bad assumption? Too aggressive?
spk09: No, it's going to be closely, but, yeah, it's going to be approximately around that. It might have some, but it's going to be de minimis. It might be less than $10 million.
spk02: This is a little bit esoteric, but, you know... I am, I think, the third largest shareholder in the company. And if we don't have a favorable conclusion to the auction process, and I say we don't have a favorable conclusion, I think that the buyer should have to pay materially more than the last sale to buy this business. that we should consider substituting debt for equity in the capital structure. In other words, we're in an environment where interest rates are lowest in history, and our equity price is very cheap relative to the underlying asset value. So it would seem to me to be intelligent to substitute debt for equity in the capital structure as long as we feel we're, you know, a couple hundred million dollar EBITDA-type earner, which I suspect you think we're probably higher than that going forward. They're just expressing a view, and I'm happy to discuss that offline with management. And my last observation, you're going to love this one, Mike. Why are we making it so difficult for people to listen to the call? Why are we requiring preregistration and stuff like that? What are we afraid of? I mean, I've been doing this for over 50 years. I don't recall this being done by anybody else. Why are you doing it that way? To ask questions, you have to preregister.
spk08: It's a matter that our provider has scaled back during COVID. There's not as many operators available. And so if everybody dials in at the last minute, they're going to be overwhelmed. And so they're asking people to pre-register. We're hoping that this will go away.
spk02: Gotcha. Okay. I got you. Thank you. Thank you for your answer. I appreciate it. Good luck. Stay safe. Stay healthy. Thank you.
spk01: Your next question. Your next question comes from the line of Richard Kerrigan with Equitech.
spk03: Good morning, guys. You've already answered my questions, but I have one last question. Did we undertake this review process four months ago as a result of some specific expression of interest in the company? That's my only question now.
spk04: Well, thank you. Thank you for the question. No, it was because the board discussed the strategic position of the company, and it was the view of the board that it was a good time and the right opportunity to undertake this process.
spk03: And did I understand you correctly, answering an earlier question, that the process will probably drag on for another two months, perhaps?
spk04: Well, I cannot preempt that, but we expect that it will go for the next few months.
spk03: Thank you for your time and good luck.
spk04: Thank you.
spk01: Our next question comes from the line of Jim Young with Midwest Investments.
spk05: Yeah. Hi. A couple of questions here for you. Number one, regarding these cost trends that you experienced in the quarter, are these expected to remain at these elevated levels for the foreseeable future, or would we expect to see the decline materializing over the next couple of quarters? Thank you. That's my first question.
spk04: Thank you, Jim. Thanks for the question. As the grades go up, Jim, we expect the cost per metal produced to go down. But that's a function of how we can be successful in bringing these higher grade ore into the mix. I think we are getting there in Bolívar. uh who sees a bit behind because of all the impacts that they had in the first quarter charicocha it's a bit more difficult because as i said we are in the middle of this second wave in peru so it's getting a bit trickier to to get into those or as soon as we would have liked to having said that uh we are bringing more workforce into the mine and trying to get faster into those grades. So that's a function of how we do and how well we can do in terms of this COVID situation. Let me give you a number that strikes, that has striking me in the first quarter. In January, out of the 565 or 70 people that work in Bolivar, we have, through the screening process, we could stop over 150 that were sick with COVID. And in February, we had over 40. So we're talking in the first month, over 25% of our workers were sick of COVID. And in the second month, another 8%. So this has been a real hit, okay, in Mexico in the first quarter. Now we're seeing way lower numbers, but we are still looking into it. Now in Peru, we are seeing more cases. So we still don't know how this is going to evolve, but we are happy that our screening process is working, okay, but we are certainly I'm happy that so many of our workers have been sick out of this disease over the last few months.
spk05: Great. Thank you. And I appreciate your focus on the safety of the employees. The next question would be pertaining, and this is for Ed, is regarding the TCs and RCs. And, Ed, I recognize and understand in the past you aren't able to really comment directly upon Sierra Metals is a specific situation, but can you give us a sense as to how much of the benefit from lower TCs and RCs we saw in the first quarter? And can you help us give us a feel for how much additional benefit do you expect in the second quarter, third quarter, and fourth quarter of 2021? Thanks, Jim.
spk09: That's a very good question. And I don't mind going in and elaborating a little bit more on the TCE situation, especially with the rising metal prices. And I could explain a little bit how the TCE mechanism works. So just first off, the first quarter still had TCEs and RCs from the previous year, negotiated contracts. And that was because of COVID, we had delays in fulfilling all of our contractual commitments with our customers, with our off-takers. Typically, these contracts for concentrates are very short-term. They're usually one year in nature. And the reasoning for that is many, we do a tender process every year. It involves about 20 off-takers, some refiners. And built into these, the TC's, RC's, if you will, are escalators. And what that means is that when you negotiate a contract, the counterparty wants to or puts in provisions that they participate in the upside of any metal prices. So in the case of, let's just take copper. Copper has, a year ago, copper was around $2.50. We're currently at $4.70. So what does that mean to the TC? Your TC would be negotiated at a base price. And that base price, for argument's sake, let's just say was $6,000 per ton copper price. we're now at over $10,000 per tonne and rising. The implications on the TC is as the metal price rises, the off-takers can participate by way of an escalator in the form of higher TC. So essentially what I'm saying is that they participate in the upside. We don't get 100% of the upside. It's not like you can just Take a benchmark TC for copper, for instance, of $60. No, that $60 will increase. And in the case of copper, it could be significant. If metal prices were to stay where they are now, you could see a significant rise in that TC based on the escalator.
spk08: I understand that that's industry-wide.
spk09: That's correct. That's industry-wide, and it does affect our all-in sustaining costs, not our cash costs, but our all-in sustaining costs, which is essentially out of our control in that we include it in the overall cost number. And that's what we're dealing with there. So there is some upward pressure definitely on the TCs and RCs. Even though we negotiated... much better terms in terms of if you if you want to take benchmark as if you look at benchmark for zinc for instance it was down last year's benchmark was about 300 this year i think they they were closer to the 140 150 level same thing with copper they were down probably 25 compared to last year but you now have to factor in this escalator if you will And that could be significant, especially for copper. Copper is on a tear right now. Is it a bad thing? No, it's a good thing. I think we shouldn't – I'd sooner take this than a copper price of $2.50, but it's important to recognize that we don't participate fully in the upside of metal production.
spk08: And that's just for this year.
spk09: That's correct. So because we keep these contracts relatively short term, so when we negotiate next year, these escalators, they reset to zero. So if copper was at 470 on January 1st, 2022, or whenever we negotiated that contract, that escalator, or that's the base price, and then escalators go from there. So it really doesn't have any impact long-term. It's really just a short-term impact on the TC situation.
spk05: Is that similar for RCs too?
spk09: No, it's just a TC. It's on the headline. It's on the treatment charge. Normally, these things wouldn't be... We hardly talk about it because you wouldn't see significant swings in base metal prices like we've seen. I don't recall seeing such a swing over the past 10 years in copper prices.
spk05: Okay, and then secondly, or last I should just say, is that the guy that you gave back on January 18th for EBITDA, I'm a little curious and a little bit disappointed, frankly, that you have not eliminated the low end of that range because of – and I totally recognize and understand that the near-term challenges from COVID, the impact on production, the impact on grades a little bit. But it would seem to me that given where the commodity prices are overall, that that low end of the range is just way, way out of the question. So I don't understand why you're not eliminating that low end of the range. and updating that guidance for EBITDA for 2021?
spk09: I think it's still premature, Jim. We'll certainly look at it. I think probably in a couple months when we close off Q2, we'll definitely provide a lot more clarity at that point. But now, given the cost that we've had in Q1 associated with COVID, given this price participation that I've mentioned in terms of not benefiting fully in the price of the metals, it's – we're comfortable leaving it where it is, and we may make further adjustments or refinements to that in the future, but for now we're maintaining as is.
spk05: Okay, thank you very much. That's all for right now.
spk01: Can you have a follow-up question from the line of Mark Regman with Noble Capital Market?
spk06: Yeah, this is a question for Ed. So capital expenditures for 2021, those were originally forecasted to be 78 million, which included kind of a carryover of 10 million from last year. So 37 was for sustaining, 41 was for expansion. And now you've got the 28 million for the iron ore processing plant. So do you expect to expend the full budget
spk09: you know for the for the year or or maybe i should just ask you know could you kind of address the spending uh for the remainder of the year including the 28 million for the processing plant thank you for the question and yeah with covid we have had restrictions and that has affected mine development it's affected uh exploration development um and so that was uh we had That explained the carry forward into 2021. Could we have a similar carry forward? It's still too early to tell, but if we are restricted in terms of headcount, it could have an impact. So including the magnetite, we're looking at $106 million, the $78 million plus the $28 million that was just recently announced. Could we fall short of that? Yeah, it's too early to say, but there could be where we might have a carry forward into next year. But if we do, it's really because of the safety precautions and just having lower headcounts.
spk06: Yeah, so some of that spending will fund some of the improvements that Louise alluded to in my earlier question. So in terms of the – do you think – for your ability to gain ground for the remainder of the year in terms of production, is that more of a function of the sustaining CapEx spending, or will some of that be on expansion as well?
spk09: In terms of maintaining, because we could easily... The plant capacity, we can go over... So it's really just in the sustaining. The growth really doesn't impact production. It's all in the sustaining. And the good thing is we have the cash to fund the CapEx. So if we can, we definitely will spend it. It's really more of a security situation regarding COVID.
spk06: Okay, great. Thank you very much.
spk01: And there are no questions at this time.
spk08: Thank you, Operator. That concludes today's call. On behalf of the management team, I would like to thank all the participants for joining us today. A replay of the webcast and all materials can be found on our website at sierrametals.com. If there are any further questions or concerns, you may reach out to us after today's call. Our contact information can be found in today's presentation as well as on the company's website. Thank you, operator. Please conclude the call.
spk01: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference call. Today's conference call has concluded. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer