This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

Aimia Inc.
5/13/2020
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the EMEA Inc. first quarter 2020 results call. At this time, all participants' lines are in a listen-only mode. After this period's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 1 on your telephone keypad. I would now like to hand the comments over to your speaker today, Mr. Tom Tran, Director of Investors. Thank you. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, Brandi, and welcome everyone to this morning's call. Today's presentation is available on CDAR and will be available on our website. Before we get underway, I'd like to remind everyone to review our four looking statements and the cautions and risk factors pertaining to the statements, which can be found on slide two of the Q1 Highlights presentation. The presentation refers to several non-GAAP metrics to help you better understand the results of the business. For all of our non-GAAP metrics, a definition and a reconciliation to their most comparable GAAP metric can be found on pages three and four. As usual, you will find a full GAAP income statement on page five. With me on the call today are speakers Phil Middleman, AMIA's new CEO, and Steve Leonard, our CFO. Phil will begin with our strategic highlights before handing over to Steve to take you through the results of the quarter. We will have time for your questions at the end. With that, let me hand it over to Phil.
Thanks, Tom. Hello, everyone. I'm extremely proud to be speaking to you as AMIA's new CEO and of the work this reconstituted board has achieved in such a short period of time. In only 75 days since our board was reconstituted, we have made a remarkable amount of progress. We have announced a new corporate strategy overseen by new management and a new board of directors with long track records of creating stakeholder value, highlighted by a new ownership mentality at the board level, with each board member having purchased significant amounts of stock in the open market. Aligned with our new corporate strategy, we have established an ad hoc investment committee to manage the deployment of the company's cash and liquid investments. We've also announced a significant transaction to merge our two remaining operating loyalty subsidiaries into Cognitive, highlighting the substantial value that has been created in the loyalty solutions business while greatly simplifying AMIA's corporate structure. We've refreshed and improved our relationships with key partners, including Aeromexico, where the working relationship is now very strong. As we announced last night, AMIA has signed a binding letter of intent with Aeromexico to negotiate certain amendments to the CPSA and a shareholder agreement that will ensure strong alignment of shareholders' interests in PLM and establish a minimum sales price at an adjusted EBITDA multiple of 7.5 times, with a minimum floor of $400 million for AMIA stake in PLM. We have also announced this morning that the company has made an investment in Clear Media Limited, one of the largest outdoor advertising firms in China, with market shares of more than 70% in top-tier cities, totaling approximately $75 million Canadian dollars. We will cover these two announcements in greater detail later in my remarks. Last, but by no means least, we have significantly cut costs and right-sized the corporate expenses of the leaner corporate team, reducing our overall corporate expenses from last year's $27 million to a $15 million run rate, with further savings likely. I'll now walk you through the process that the company undertook, leading to the announcement of its new strategy and the recently announced transactions that support the future strategic direction and vision for AMIA. In early March, The Board formed a special committee to evaluate the company's future strategic direction. A thorough and comprehensive process was undertaken by an ad hoc strategic review committee of independent directors comprised of Karen Bazian, Charles Frischer, Sandra Hannington, and David Rosenkranz, who chaired the committee. This group evaluated all available strategic options for AMIA to determine which would generate the most attractive long-term returns for stakeholders. After careful deliberations, the Special Committee recommended to the Board of Directors to change the company's corporate strategy to become an investment holding company focused on deploying its cash and tax assets towards the acquisitions of free cash flow generating businesses in diverse industries. AMU will now seek to make long-term investments in public and private companies on a global basis through controlling of minority stakes. We will target companies that exhibit durable economic advantages, evidenced by a well-established track record of substantial free cash flow generation over complete business cycles guided by a strong, experienced management team. As evidenced by our investment in Clear Media, Amy is now positioned to invest wherever a suitable opportunity can be identified, thus diversifying the corporation away from its prior loyalty-only investment mandate into a more broad and balanced investment holding company. We believe that leveraging the skills of a world-class board to oversee our new management team's effort is the right combination to unlock the future value of the company's substantial assets and investments that deploy its capital. To support the company, the corporation's new strategic focus, we announced two M&A transactions that are aligned with our vision and direction for the company. The first M&A transaction is the acquisition of Middleman Brothers, which provides a company with key management skills and expertise to execute on the new corporate strategy. This transaction was evaluated by the Strategic Review Committee, comprised of independent directors, which unanimously recommended that AMIA's Board of Directors approve the acquisition. I have been appointed interim CEO of AMIA to lead the execution of this new strategy, and upon closing of the transaction, I will be appointed permanently. Chris Middleman will be joining AMIA's CIO and will become a member of the Board of Directors. While Chris will continue to manage Middleman Brothers' portfolio independently, he will also provide added insights towards our goal of acquiring operating businesses that can capitalize on AMIA's nearly $700 million in various forms of tax loss assets. This transaction received a third-party fairness opinion and was structured in a highly favorable way for AMIA, tying the majority of the stock compensation to future earn-out hurdles. including a significant increase in Middleman Brothers assets under management and or AMIA stock, trading at a weighted average of $6 per share over a 20-day period. I'm excited and confident to lead and execute AMIA's new strategic vision, and I look forward to working closely with the board to execute on our new and promising core strategy. The second M&A transaction is the merger of Loyalty Solutions and Cognitive to form a visionary leader in loyalty. For years, AMI's stakeholders have watched our loyalty businesses lose money, with over $80 million in cash burned over the past two years. I am very proud to announce that our successful transformation of these businesses has led to significant improvement, resulting in our announcement today of the first quarter's solid adjusted EBITDA performance of $3.6 million for the loyalty solutions segment. Loyalty Solutions is well-positioned to accelerate its growth as a result of the merger with Cognitive, with each providing cost and business synergies that should dramatically accelerate their growth trajectories. Amy was presented an exciting opportunity in Cognitive, whose proprietary AI peer-to-peer technology allows their partners to distribute and apply rewards via the loyalty capital network to maximize yield and consumer lifetime value. Cognitive's extensive investment in technology will enhance and further enable the loyalty solutions platform and represent a significant acceleration of our combined business models, which are fully funded, with the likely potential to become EBITDA and cash flow positive in 2021, with accelerating growth in that period and beyond that far exceeds our previous internal projections for our loyalty services division. Importantly, Cognitive's management board of directors bring an invaluable array of talented business acumen to the newly merged entity. This transaction is structured similarly to our highly successful investment in Cardlytics, where AMIA contributed certain IP, operating expertise, and board presence, along with funding, into a tech-forward company, which was subsequently bought public in an IPO. We believe this merged entity has the potential for a monetization event that would provide a similar positive outcome. Concurrent with this merger, AMIA and Cognitive Investors will contribute $35 million Canadian dollars in exchange for 12% yielding convertible preferred shares in the newly merged entity, of which AMIA will be contributing $21 million and existing Cognitive Investors and board members will fund the remaining $14 million. This investment made side-by-side with Cognitive Investors signals a strong vote of confidence in the future of the newly merged and financed business with a healthy equity valuation. It also greatly simplifies AMIA's holding company structure and ring fences these operations outside of the parent company and into an external holding that we will be a minority owner of, providing significant upside to AMIA stakeholders while limiting future risk. Integration planning is well underway and client responses on both sides have been very positive. We remain on track to close the transaction by the end of this month. The Board has also worked with the AMIA's management to dramatically reduce corporate costs, leading to a leaner corporate structure. These reductions create immediate and significant stakeholder value through a substantial reduction in annualized operating run rate expenses from $27 million in 2019 to approximately $15 million with further cuts targeted. Corporate operating run rate expenses of $15 million include expenses related to central operating costs such as public company disclosure and board costs, executive leadership, financial reporting, insurance, treasury, tax, M&A, and rent. In conjunction with these savings and following the close of the loyalty solutions and cognitive merger, and acquisition of Middleman Brothers, AMIA's total employee count will be reduced from 450 to approximately 20, as a substantial portion of the staffing will be shifted to the newly merged entity. With those changes will also come substantially reduced operational complexity. This business simplification will help investors better understand the go-forward AMIA story that will consist of a leaner corporate team guided by a highly skilled board, focused on growing the value of its five core holdings in the soon-to-be merged Cognitive, PLM, Big Life, Middleman Brothers, and Clear Media. Each investment is ring-fenced from the parent, which remains debt-free and cash-rich. Going forward, any further acquisitions AMIA makes will be structured as ring-fenced, stand-alone entities that are not financially entangled with AMIA's parent and will not expose AMIA to any risk other than its equity commitment to the investment. Post-transactions, reflecting for the company's new equity investment in Clear Media and AMIA will retain approximately $190 million on a pro forma basis in cash and liquid investments while maintaining an attractive capital structure reflecting the various stock buybacks in 2019, which represented over 40% of the outstanding common shares. As announced last night, AMIA has signed a binding letter of intent with Aeromexico to negotiate certain amendments to the CPSA, including a 20-year extension of its term through 2050, as well as certain amendments to the shareholder agreement, including granting Aeromexico a seven-year option to purchase AMIA's 48.9% equity interest in PLM, and it adjusted EBITDA multiple of 7.5 times, with a minimum floor of $400 million for AMIA's state, subject to its final agreement on certain terms and conditions. The amendments to the CPSA are intended to strengthen the relationship between Aeromexico and PLM to grow and improve the program, and align PLM shareholder interest regarding PLM profitability and value. As part of this agreement, PLM is funded using cash from its balance sheet, $50 million U.S. to Aeromexico in the form of an intercompany loan following the execution of this binding letter of intent, with an additional U.S. $50 million of additional liquidity to be funded by PLM to Aeromexico in the form of prepurchases of award tickets upon the final amendments to the CPSA. Both loans will be secured by Aeromexico's 51.1% equity interest in PLM. We are happy to provide additional liquidity to our valued partner through these unprecedented times. Subject to market conditions, AMIA and Aeromexico will explore alternatives to strengthen PLM's balance sheet and enhance distribution to shareholders. We believe providing Aeromexico with added liquidity and the option to acquire full control of its loyalty program allows both shareholders' interests to be fully aligned going forward. We expect a renewed relationship with Aeromexico will enhance the value of PLM for all stakeholders in the year to come. Finally, let me talk about our new and exciting investment in Clear Media that we announced this morning. AMIA invested approximately $75 million in Clear Media Limited, one of the largest outdoor advertising firms operating in China, with market shares of more than 70% in top-tier cities like Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou, and publicly listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The investment in Clear Media Limited was acquired through a series of common share purchases totaling 58.8 million common shares. which included 19.6 million common shares previously held by clients of Middleman Investment Management, an average cost of HK$7.12 per share, reflecting the same price that would have been paid to the clients of Middleman Investment Management through the current tender offer. This investment was made in anticipation of a pending change of control transaction, which, if completed, would see current controlling shareholder Clear Channel Outdoor sell its 50.9% stake in Clear Media to Ever Harmonic Global, which is owned 40% by Clear Media's CEO, 30% by Ant Financial, which is controlled by Jack Ma, 23% of JC Deco, a public company and leader in the outdoor advertising space, and 7% by JSC Capital Management Limited. We believe an investment in clear media represents an outstanding opportunity for AMIA stakeholders, diversifying our holdings and taking advantage of the COVID-19-related economic malaise in the U.S. and China. AMIA now owns a large stake in the leader in the outdoor advertising market in China, that's debt-free with more than a 20-year track record, strong growth and free cash flow generation, and 19 years as a public company, backed by a blue-chip consortium of investors and a highly skilled management team. I'll now hand it over to Steve. He'll focus on our financial highlights before I wrap up with closing remarks.
Thanks, Phil. We once again delivered on continuing operational progress. The highlight in the first quarter was the positive adjusted EBITDA performance of $5 million, an improvement of $4 million over the same quarter of last year, despite incurring one-time costs of $2 million for IT decoupling, $1 million in severance, and $1 million in litigation and activism-related expenses. Free cash flow was negative $26 million in the quarter, a decline of $6 million over last year, which included $19 million of Part VI tax paid in the quarter related to preferred dividends paid in 2019, which included $26 million of preferred dividends paid in arrears. Excluding one-time payments, which included the Part 6 tax paid related to dividends and arrears and severance, free cash flow was negative $10 million, which represents $1 million improvement over the same period, excluding similar items. Overall, we had a strong first quarter that demonstrated continuing operating performance. In our loyalty solutions division, our focus on delivering great service to our clients coupled with tight cost discipline has led to improving profitability for the business. Loyalty Solutions operating expense was $27 million in the first quarter, an improvement of $19 million over last year's operating expense of $46 million. Reduced headcount, lower technology costs, and benefits from office consolidation were the key drivers of operating expense improvements in the first quarter. Loyalty Solutions adjusted EBITDA performance was positive $3.6 million compared to a loss of $10 million last year, reflecting a successful transformation of that business, which will be merged with Cognitive, turbocharged the new entity's growth and profitability profile. Moving to our corporate another, operating expenses slightly improved over last year as the benefit from lower headcount was mostly offset by increased restructuring expenses of the corporate team, as well as the impact of the one-time costs related to technology decoupling and shareholder activism. As highlighted by Phil earlier, Corporate operating run rate expenses are expected to be $15 million, reflecting a leaner corporate team with a simplified holding company structure. Moving to PLM. PLM's financial performance in the first quarter was positive, and operating metrics were solid. Member growth was up 8% over last year to 6.8 million enrolled members in the first quarter, and gross billings were up 3% year-over-year to 61.5% U.S., mainly driven by the growth at Aeromexico. PLM's adjusted EBITDA performance was up 9% over the same period in the previous year to $22.3 million, or an adjusted EBITDA margin of 34.7% from the modest top-line growth and tight cost controls. AMIA received $9.5 million in distributions in the first quarter, down from last year, which benefited from a one-time exceptional distribution. Subsequent to the end of the quarter, AMIA and Aeromexico agreed to an additional distribution. AMIA's share of that incremental amount was $7 million Canadian, which will appear in our second quarter results. As recently announced, AMIA expects PLM to be negatively impacted by COVID-19, resulting in materially lower gross billings, adjusted EBITDA and cash flow for the remainder of 2020. Consequently, AMIA now expects no distributions from PLM operations in the second half of this year. The company continues to closely monitor the evolving situation and is working collaboratively with Aeromexico and PLM. We believe the impacts are transient. and although the timing of a return to normalcy remains uncertain, we do not expect these impacts to be permanent. Turning now to free cash flow. Reported free cash flow for the quarter declined by $6 million over last year's cash flow of negative $26 million. We included $19 million in Part VI tax paid in the quarter, of which $10 million is assumed to be one time in nature. Going forward, Part 6 taxes are expected to be around $5 million per year or 40% preferred dividends paid. We collected $1 million in cash interest and working capital and other outflows of $13 million and a quarter, which included restructuring payments of $6 million and other share-based and incentive payments, which typically occur in the first quarter of the year. Moving on to the balance sheet. We ended the quarter with cash, restricted cash, and investment in bonds totaling $322 million. Restricted cash was $94 million at the end of March, of which $68 million was set aside as restricted cash as part of the Arrow Plan transaction. Around $65 million of the restricted cash is expected to be released to AMIA in accordance with the terms of the share purchase agreement. On a pro forma cash basis, the company continues to maintain a robust balance sheet with a healthy level of cash to operate and grow the business. Following the closing of the transactions, reflecting AMIA's new equity investment in Clear Media, pro forma cash is expected to be approximately $190 million. This includes the $7 million payment for the acquisition of Middleman Brothers, $21 million payment for the funding of the 12% convertible preferred equity and newly merged Cognitive, and the $75 million in Clear Media, as well as some related... expenses, and transaction costs. And with that, I'll hand it back to Phil to wrap up with closing remarks.
Thanks, Steve. This is an historic moment for AMIA, and we have an exciting and promising future. I'm delighted to lead AMIA as its CEO, but I am also an investor, and I'm now surrounded and overseen by investors, each with their own skill sets to offer, but all of whom are focused on one thing, creating stakeholder value. Our corporate transformation, including a refreshed strategy that's led by a new and leaner management team, overseen by a world-class board, having proven their ownership mentality by purchasing stock in the open market, will contribute to and oversee this focus. As evidenced by the expansion of our relationship with Aeromexico and PLM announced last night, the cognitive transaction, and our investment in Clear Media Limited that we announced this morning, we continue to take advantage of dislocations in the worldwide economy and the markets that are providing investment opportunities for AMIA. We are very confident that as stakeholders, you can now look to the future with optimism and excitement. In less than 90 days, we have demonstrated clear and definitive value creation. Through the merger of Loyalty Solutions and Cognitive, we will retain significant upside to the new entity while greatly simplifying the holding company structure and limiting future risk. The amendments to the CPSA and the shareholders agreement that we will finalize with Aeromexico are meant to ensure that both shareholders' interests are fully aligned going forward and is expected to value AMIA's stake at PLM in a minimum of $400 million, representing more than $5.75 Canadian per share. Furthermore, our investment in ClearMedia provides an exciting long-term investment in a well-established free cash flow generating business backed by a blue-chip consortium of investors at an attractive valuation that we believe can deliver substantial returns to stakeholders. This board and management team are fueled by an urgency to achieve our goals as quickly and as efficiently as we can, And these recent achievements should be a strong harbinger of the exciting future that lies ahead for AMIA stakeholders. So with that, we'll turn it over to your questions. Operator, please go ahead.
As a reminder, to ask questions, you will need to press star 1 on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. We respectfully ask that you please omit your questions to 2. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from Matt Sweeney of Lafayette Capital.
Hi. How you doing, guys? Hey, Matt. So first question in terms of PLM and Aeromexico. There's obviously a lot of uncertainty with global airlines these days. So can you kind of talk about how you got comfortable with sending cash from PLM to Aeromexico in context of any potential bankruptcy risk at Aeromexico? And then can you also talk about how the deal was funded and what the pro forma cash or working capital situation is at PLM?
Sure. I think very few people appreciate and understand the strength of PLM's balance sheet. This is a company with, when you net out the ticket pre-buys, it's got almost $170, $180 million in cash on the balance sheet with no debt. and tremendous earning power. This company generates significant amounts of EBITDA and free cash flow year over year. So when you look at how we're funding this transaction, we had to take into account a lot of variables. We're in very close contact with Air Mexico, and we've evaluated their financial position, and they're in one of the strongest positions of the airlines. They've got significant liquidity and runway to make it through this. They've managed their costs extremely well. We think that this transaction helps them further and is part of other initiatives that they're working on to further enhance their liquidity. So the way we structured this was to loan them cash off the balance sheet of PLM, secured by their stake in PLM. So from a PLM perspective, we're now getting a reasonable interest rate on money that we're lending to a partner that's benefiting a partner that obviously its health is important to us and to the future of TLM. And we're getting back in exchange something very significant for AMEA stakeholders. So there's a balancing act here, and it's one that we're very careful about and wary of Aeromexico's situation. But in an Armageddon situation where Aeromexico did go bankrupt, I think... history has shown us that these loyalty businesses, you know, not only survive, but they typically thrive during periods like this and oftentimes help out their partner airline in a way that benefits them financially as well. So I think, you know, even in that situation, if you just recently saw Avianca declared bankruptcy and Air Miles, their provider who recently did a leverage recap and went public, still has their bonds trading around 80 cents on the dollar and I think the perception there is that they'll do fine as well because these airlines, even if they go through a restructuring, typically continue to operate, and their loyalty companies continue to operate. So we see this as a win-win transaction for everybody, and we're very close with Aeromexico now. It's a very positive relationship, and I think that we all have the same goal, which is to benefit PLM, which benefits AMIA, and benefits Aeromexico, which is the partner obviously feeding PLM's business. We've weighed all of the different elements of this, and I think we made it a great deal.
Great, thank you. I didn't realize that it was secured by Aeromexico's stake in PLM. It's great to hear. And then in the event that Aeromexico eventually exercises their purchase option, can you talk about any tax implications for Ambient, if any?
Yeah, the... The way that investment is structured, we should be shielded from any tax liability. We have a Canadian capital loss. We have a UK ownership structure that will have no tax there. And we believe that we can exit Mexico in a very tax-efficient manner, and we have a path to do that. So we don't see any significant tax on the transaction going forward. I'd also add that part of this agreement is that we are going to pursue a recapitalization of PLM's balance sheet that, if we can succeed, would yield a significant additional amount of cash to PLM's balance sheet, which we would dividend out our share to ourselves and to AirMexico to them. So there's a lot of power on PLM's balance sheet that is not being tapped between its cash and the fact that it has no debt and no leverage. So it's a very exciting opportunity going forward to maximize that value for all of us.
Great. And then if I could just sneak one more in quickly on Clear Media. So I know Middleman Brothers are long-term owners of Clear Media, and then a group of investors came together to take the company private because Clear Channel Outdoors was somewhat of a forced seller due to their own leverage problems. Is there a right way to think about this, simply that Middleman Brothers clients couldn't participate in a going private transaction? but AMIA can, so AMIA is able to step in and basically become part of the consortium that's taking this private?
That's exactly right. We had no choice. Middleman Brothers clients are not allowed to hold private investments, and this is most likely going to become a private investment, so we would be forced to sell at the 712 tender. So AMIA purchased those shares as part of these purchases, and I think some of the stock we got from other people out in the open market are probably exposed in the same way. So this is an amazing investment that we would love to hold, and we've held it for seven years and experienced how smart management is and how well it manages business and the incredible free cash flow generation that's taken place. I mean, these guys have dividended out $250 million in cash. We received almost our entire investment back just from dividends over the period we've owned it. So this is something we didn't want to part with, and this transaction is effectively allowing this group to purchase assets This company was normalized five times EBITDA with huge growth possibilities and really enhanced growth possibilities because of the group getting involved. Previously, this had been run as kind of a cash funding mechanism for Clear Channel who needed the cash. So it had been deprived of cash that should have been used towards growth initiatives like converting to digital billboards. So this new group coming in you can clearly argue that going forward, this is even more attractive than it was before. So even though we're looking at five times EBITDA as a normalized number, you're looking at a much more enhanced profile going forward. They have no debt. They can do a leverage recap themselves. When the group of people involved, and you have Jack Ma involved now running this, and you have J.C. DeCote, a very large public company and the leader in the space, you've got a this is a deal that you would dream of participating in as an outsider. And we had the opportunity because Middleman Brothers had some stock and because other people had stock they couldn't hold, AMIA as a permanent capital vehicle has the opportunity to hold it. So this is really evidence of kind of a synergy you can see between Middleman Brothers and AMIA where both parties can benefit from an opportunity like this where even though Middleman Brothers clients had to sell, they now get at least to participate in it through their ownership of AMIA, so it's a little upside for them. But in general, this is an opportunity that AMIA can be afforded because of its structure. And also, to add to that, we have this very large capital loss in AMIA that could shield gains from this as well, so that's an added benefit as well.
Great. Thanks very much. That's all I have.
No, thank you.
Thank you. Your next question comes from Brian Morrison of TD Securities.
Hi, Brian. Hey, good morning, Phil. Many of my questions are asked there, but I just want to follow up on Clear Media. Is there any kind of rationale or benefit behind the 10% stake that you've taken there?
Yes. Yes, there is. In the proposed structure, if you owned less than 10%, you could conceivably be crammed down. I'm not saying they would do that, but By owning more than 10%, you protect yourselves. They cannot take the stake away from us, and we're allowed to maintain that stake going forward. So it protects you against that possibility.
Okay, and if I can follow up on the Club Premier transaction, I agree it's beneficial to utilize the pre-compliant program in the event of a bankruptcy filing. But in terms of a recap, can you maybe just goalpost the potential size of the distribution, and then you provided us with the net cash on balance sheet. maybe you could also provide us with the size of the redemption liability is on the balance sheet as well.
Sure. I think, um, I think that we, uh, um, Steve, what's the number? Is it like a hundred? We know what the liability is on the balance.
Yeah. It's about, uh, it's about 230 million.
Yeah. I think Brian, with regard to the, the leverage recap. So, you know, obviously the debt markets froze up and we've been monitoring them and, and, If you look at the AirMiles transaction, it's held up really well, even though Avianca went bankrupt and the debt markets have frozen up, so that's a really good indicator. I think that based on a normalized EBITDA production, resuming relative EBITDA normalcy, we could probably do a transaction in the three to four times range and provide about $200 million to PLM in the laboratory cap, and we would dividend half of that to each of us.
Okay. That's impressive. Last question is on cognitive. And maybe you can just do it in layman terms, but maybe just explain the rationale behind cognitive taking a material haircut to its October valuation to merge your transaction.
Sure. I think... This transaction is very exciting, and I don't think anybody's giving much credence to it, but I think they will in the future. Cognitive, you have to look at cognitive kind of as a late-stage venture capital play, merging with LS, which is a more mature business, and loyalty. So when cognitive came to us, it was because when COVID hit, they were just about to close a funding deal. and the funding entity is a pretty blue-chip Canadian group, just froze all their investments. So it was an opportunity that came to us as a funding opportunity. But once we spoke, we were really stunned by the synergies between our loyalty solutions and their business. And I was struck by how exciting their business model is. I mean, they did a billion three in transactions last year, and I'm starting to see this kind of critical mass that they're about to hit. in in their model so so peter schwartz the ceo and i just immediately hit it off and basically one afternoon we structured this deal where we saw it as a merger of equals now they had just funded themselves you know they have an amazing group of investors and they had been funding themselves at a very high valuation their last round was roughly um the same as this combined entity so they took a 50 haircut and they weren't really getting hurt by covet much their entire projected hit was only about $5 million from COVID. So it really wasn't about that. It was about them being able to cross-pollinate with our loyalty solutions customers and vice versa. And I would argue that maybe this is the perfect merger you could ever ask for because there's not competitive overlap. It's really supportive overlap. So I'll give an example. We have HSBC as a banking client at you know, with air miles, and that's one of our customers, obviously. And currently, HSBC will go, you know, they'll say, okay, Phil Middleman has a gold card. I want to upgrade him to a platinum card, so I'll give him 10,000 air miles. And that's what they can do to try to promote their cards or to sign a new card member up. What they can do if they signed up with Cognitive is Cognitive will link up with HSBC. And HSBC will now know that Phil Middleman likes to go to the Ocean Club in the Bahamas, and he likes a certain restaurant that he goes to in New York City. And what they can do is they can say, okay, Phil, we're going to offer you an upgrade to a Platinum card, and also you can have a free night at the Ocean Club in the Bahamas, and you can have a 50% off gift certificate at this place. restaurant in the city that they happen to know that I eat at. That type of synergy is incredible. There's the same synergy possibility for example with Air Mexico who could sign up for a similar type of arrangement. Enabling banks to enhance their loyalty offerings via Cognito is just a tremendous opportunity. Cognito saw that And we also saw tremendous cost synergies that we think propel this to significant profitability in the not-too-distant future. So you don't want to cut your way to success and growth, but in this case, we're getting both. We have business synergies, significant business synergies. I think cognitive is being... I don't think people understand what they do. And so it took me about... a week to figure out what they did, and it's very complicated, but once you grasp what they're doing, it's a completely unique and innovative way to distribute loyalty points from partner to partner in a peer-to-peer way with no middleman and cutting out all these different fees and typically markups along the way that otherwise inhabit that sector. So they saw the value in LS and ISS, and frankly, if you look at AMIA stock, I mean, what were people valuing our loyalty solutions business at? It was either zero or negative for most people. And people weren't appreciating the fact that we've invested $350 million in these businesses and they're not profitable. And, you know, there's a lot of upside in them. But, you know, we weren't getting that. We weren't realizing that value for those entities. And I could see it being very difficult in the future because people would want to see years of growth there before they would give it any value. But in cognitive, together, you have a much more exciting entity that's now got the benefits of being standalone. And the benefits of that are they can do certain joint ventures, partnerships, financing. They can do other mergers and different things we couldn't have done inside the AMIA holding company. And ring fencing, it's very valuable. Now, if there was, for example, if everything went horribly wrong and it needed more financing or something happened, it can do that as a the parent, AMIA, being responsible for funding it. So it's a great transaction all around. It catalyzed the value in it, showing people that Cognitive sees the value in loyalty solutions, and we see it in Cognitive. And I think it's a perfect merger of equals, and that it should yield a significant return for AMIA.
Paul, very good call. Thank you kindly. Thank you.
Your next question comes from Drew McReynolds of RBC.
Yeah, thanks very much. Good morning. Just a quick follow-up on cognitive for Phil or Steve. Just in terms of disclosure going forward, clearly with PLM we do get some disclosure for a sense right now that you have in terms of some financial disclosure on the results from an AMIA standpoint.
Yeah, Drew, it's Steve. We're evaluating that because we're basically taking most of our operating entities and contributing them into the merge entity. So what we'll be left with is the three equity positions that we hold in PLM, Cognitive, Big, and the position Clear Media. We'll likely... do more enhanced reporting on each of the equity positions. How much we're going to do, we're still evaluating. But, yeah, we understand that the orientation of the disclosure will have to change with the changing business structures.
Okay. That's perfectly reasonable. Also, on the strategy for crystallizing some of these tax losses, Phil was just kind of mentioning earlier, how you can kind of tap into that eventually at the holdco level here in Canada. I think there's, you know, some others over the UK. Just remind us where you're at in terms of that. You know, I guess from my standpoint, it all presumably reside at the holdco or AMIA level, which then makes it, I think, a little awkward to try and crystallize the ones in the UK. Like, are you able to outright sell these tax losses? Just maybe some options there going forward.
We definitely don't want to sell these tax losses. We see these as very valuable. I think part of our strategy is to utilize them. We have various forms of losses. There are the capital losses, which reside in Canada, which at a parent level, we can shelter any investment gain that we make, including whether it be PLM or or is taking cognitive or clear media. So those are the capital losses. There's a significant operating loss in the U.S. and the U.K. The U.K. is a little different. It's a step-up loss. But in the U.S., we would expect to seek to acquire an operating business that we could shelter those losses with in the U.S. So it would fit the same parameters that we seek in our investments, but we would get a steady... cash flow generating business in the U.S. that we could utilize those tax losses for in the U.S. on an operating basis.
Okay, that's great, Phil. My last question here, just at the holdco level for modeling purposes, you've brought operating costs down to $15 million, so clearly a good job there. And, Phil, you say maybe some more to go. If you exclude any investment income coming up to the holdco level, Is that just almost a pure P&L here, that $15 million run rate going forward?
Well, we've got the $15 million plus the preferred dividends or the whole cost. So you're looking at basically a $24-$25 million overall expense when you add in the preferred dividends to operate going forward. We think there's some reasonably sized cuts to make at full co going forward. But in a normalized situation, we would expect that PLM's dividend alone would be covering that. And so I think we're in a great position there going forward.
Yeah, understood. Okay, thanks, Phil. Thank you.
Your next question comes from Rahul Khan of DG Capital Management.
Hi.
Hey, Phil. Hey, Phil, how you doing? Great, how are you? Pretty good, pretty good. I had a couple of quick questions on PLM. In the announcement from last night, I thought the language around strengthening the shareholder agreement was pretty interesting and wanted to see if you could provide some more color around just around that comment and when you talk about the stronger alignment and strengthening of shareholder rights. You know, what does that mean relative to the current structure that's in place?
Sure. I think when you have to look at, you know, part of being able to repair this relationship and create this going forward plan was to acknowledge the fact that in order to, you know, to ask Aeromexico to extend this agreement was asking them to increase the value significantly. So, you know, they didn't have to tell me this, but when I asked them for it, I'm basically saying, okay, well, if you're going to extend this, you're going to create the value. You're going to have to pay up for it later if you want to acquire it. So we had to really look at this as a situation where by doing this stuff for us, they're creating significant value for us as well and significant cost for themselves going forward if they want to acquire it. That's a natural progression because these airlines always want to fold in these businesses eventually. So we had to take that all into account. The changes that we're talking about making towards the agreement are all changes that will benefit PLM. And we're not looking to do anything to transfer value to Aeromexico that would hurt PLM shareholders. So we're evaluating all of the different, a lot of different kind of, I would say that, I wouldn't say kind of frozen in the past, but there's been, you know, part of Aeromexico's frustration was that previous management and previous people involved at at AMIA had been blocking certain initiatives that they thought were progressive and happening in all the other loyalty companies, and they were being restricted from doing. And they have a lot of good ideas to kind of broaden the scope of their offerings and diversifying away from just purely, you know, Air Mexico as the prime source of their earn and burn. So I think the... The goal of those changes is we're going to run a careful analysis of how the change will affect PLM, but overall, they should enhance the value of it going forward, and we're very cognizant of where the value goes, and they're aware of it with us, and the changes will be positive.
Got it. Okay, so in terms of the... Is anything changing with respect to minority voting rights or just rights as a 49% shareholder?
No. I think all we're doing here is acknowledging that Air Mexico knows how to run this business better than we do, and we don't want to stand in the way of that. As long as this is all structured in the framework of protecting us as minority shareholders and our rights, remaining the same, just making sure that we're not making a change that will transfer too much value over to Aeromexico and not enough value to PLM. So, you know, you want the airline to succeed, you want it to be healthy, but you want PLM to participate as well. And we don't want, you know, part of the reason why we have the minimum $400 million purchase price is just to protect against, you know, whether it's intentional or accidental drop in EBITDA or a free cash flow that might be caused by some of these changes, although we don't expect that to be the case. We have a floor that we believe is fair and a multiple that we believe is fair. So I think we're maintaining all of those rights is the answer to that question.
Got it. Okay. And then just one follow-up. I think I missed it earlier, but did you give the cash balance or the pro forma cash balance at PLM?
Approximately, we had done some ticket pre-buys in the past. The way those ticket pre-buys work is you use them to burn off the tickets as they're called. It's a form of an advance to Aeromexico. Once those are normalized and returned, I think you wind up with around $180 million, $170 million on the balance sheet. It's been frustrating because people don't realize that half of that is ours. So, you know, you don't see any valuation models where they have our cash in the balance sheet at PLM included. But, you know, it's a real asset. And so that cash is sitting there. And, you know, what we are using it for is we're using it the right way, which is to make secured loans to Aramax to help them, which helps us. And, you know, there's a higher yield for it from an interest rate perspective. That money will come back. and as Aeromexico recovers, we will pursue the leverage recap to provide a significant amount of cash to the balance sheet that we can then distribute out.
Got it. So the $100 million that's going to Aeromexico, that's basically going to take $100 million off that $170 to $180.
You're taking temporarily, you're taking $100 million off that, half of that, or take it pre-buy. So again, you're you're just kind of advancing against what you're going to be using to pay off people that are burning tickets. So those will, you know, you're basically, it's almost like it's an operational, it's going to fund your operations going forward in terms of the burn. The other 50 is a secured loan. They're both secured loans, but the other 50 is a loan that is paid back, $25 million of it is paid back in the event of a leverage recap. So leaving 25 outstanding. So the cash finds its way back to the balance sheet in a relatively quick manner.
Got it. And that 170 to 180, is that U.S. or is that Canadian?
U.S. U.S.
U.S., okay.
All the numbers involving PLM are U.S.
Okay, got it. And what's the interest rate that you're earning on the loan?
The interest rate is 6%.
Got it. Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from Chris Colvin of Reach Inlet Capital.
Hey, Chris.
Hey, first I want to say congrats on all the work you guys have done here in the less than three months, I guess two and a half months. It's very, very impressive. My questions have basically been answered, but maybe a little more clarity just on ClearMedia. the diligence process that the board took before acquiring the stake. I understand that you and your firm had a long history there, so there was a lot of front diligence you could help with, but just discuss kind of what was the process that the AIM board took before acquiring that stake.
Yeah, I mean, the diligence level at AMIA was actually heightened because of involvement of other shareholders, including Middleman Brothers, so they wanted to be very, very careful about getting involved. We had a very long experience, so we could provide a streamlined version for them of all of our experiences with management and the business history of the company. The investment committee spent a great amount of time analyzing this and presenting to the board and the company. not only diligence provided by middlemen, but we did a lot of external due diligence, including people that had been involved in these transactions before, people, third parties that had no tie to this that we got a lot of great insights from. We are, you know, there's been, when you look at the people getting involved with this, that speaks very much to kind of the We addressed a lot of the risks of governance in a situation like this in China, and all the things that you would want to cover as an investor. Amy was very, very careful about covering all those bases, and we wanted to make sure that we were moving into something that, especially when you're dealing with China and you're dealing with an investment in something that had been significantly hurt by COVID and and obviously China's economy had taken a significant hit. So we looked into all of that stuff, and what came out was all very, very positive. And we're very confident with the governance situation there. We're very confident with the finances. We're very comfortable with the go-forward strategy. And the people involved, I would say that if you're an investor looking at this and someone told you that you could partner with China Jack Ma, J.C. Decoe, and JIC and get involved with a leading outdoor advertising firm in China at the bottom of an economic cycle. And you could do it at five times EBITDA and normalize EBITDA. I mean, it's almost unimaginable that you'd be able to participate in that. So we recognized all of that. And I think that buying in at the price we did and having... All the diligence that we had, which was including a lot of third-party involvement, made Amy very comfortable with the transaction.
That's very helpful. And then you touched on this as well, but just for clarity, your stake, which I guess in theory can block a delisting given you own 10% plus, is the intention for your stake to remain public or ultimately you'll go private with this buyout and then obviously, I'm sure you plan to hold it for a while, but if it is to go private, what would be the potential exit strategy?
I think the 10% stake is not to protect against delisting as much as to protect against a cram down. We just want to be able to make sure that we could maintain the stake, which that allows us to do. I think that You know, it could remain as a possibility. It could remain a public holding, but I think it's beneficial for everybody to have them go private with this, which is what we expect to happen, so that they can, you know, the concept of anchoring, you know, people would have a liquid stub that they would have to, you know, value. And I don't think, you know, when you're in a private company situation with these people that are involved, I think they want to kind of hypergrow this and do what they want to do without having to deal with public markets expense and disclosure. And then I think the plan would be if we're, you know, from our perspective, we believe that they'll wind up doing an IPO for this in a few years and that would be the exit strategy. I mean, the people involved here are incredibly smart and connected and I think that they, you know, clear media before this happened was a very attractive business and it's something that anyone should want to invest in. But going forward, I mean, you now have such an added level of growth potential and expertise in financing connections and government connections in China that this should be able to grow at a much more rapid rate. And there's a lot of things that could probably happen here that we're not even anticipating. There's probably roll-up opportunities, other merger opportunities, and these are things that are more easily done in the private company state. So I would expect that that's what will happen. And we're happy to go along for the ride.
Great. Well, I appreciate the color and congrats again on everything you've accomplished so far.
Thank you very much. Appreciate it.
If there are no further questions, I would now like to hand the call back over to Phil Middleman, CEO, for closing.
Sorry, guys. So thank you, everybody. I think I actually... made my closing statement ready. But I will say thank you, everybody, for your time, and we really appreciate your support. We couldn't be more excited about what we're doing here and the go-forward strategy, and I think there's a lot more to come.