This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

ConvaTec Group Plc
7/30/2024
So quiet, but I got some smiles, which is good. Hi, Monita. Nice to see you. She's like, why is he calling me out? Anyway, look, it's a real pleasure to be with you here this morning, and I'd like to welcome you to Convitec's first half 2024 results review. Well, what we'll be doing today, both Johnny and I, is reviewing both our financial performance and the strategic progress we've made. We're very pleased with the financial performance and the strategic progress we've made. And what I thought we could do now was to really spend some time to understand what are the five key overarching messages or thoughts we want to leave you with today. The first one is that in the first half of the year, we went ahead and delivered strong, broad-based organic revenue growth. In addition, we're very much on track to go ahead and expand our operating profit margin. and we're growing our earnings and our free cash flow. So clearly a strong financial result. When you then combine that from a strategic vantage point, we've gone ahead and strengthened our competitive position and our new product launches are doing very well in the marketplace. When you sum that all up, we're confirming to you 2024 guidance and our medium-term guidance. That's in essence what we want to share with you today. But let's look at some data. Let's look at some numbers to understand how has Convitec been performing during the course of the last five years. What you can see is that from a organic revenue perspective, there's been a clear acceleration in organic revenue growth. We've been executing a lot better across the entire value chain, R&D, operations, commercial. And we're very much on track to go ahead and once again deliver 5% to 7% organic revenue growth. And we anticipate and expect to be at the upper half of that range this year. In addition, when you look at the operating margin, what's been happening there is that initially we depressed that operating margin. We invested even more in R&D. We invested more in commercial. And at the same time, we went ahead and started driving efficiency in the area of GNA, and in the area of operations. And now you can start seeing how we're expanding our operating profit margin, gaining the benefit of the productivity initiatives, and gaining the benefit of leverage. And so we're very much on track to deliver at least a 21% operating profit margin in constant currency this year. At this point, let's go ahead and double-click and really understand how do we perform financially in the first half of the year. I'm going to pass the baton on to Johnny.
Thank you very much, Karim. Good morning, everybody. I'm going to talk about our financial performance for the first half. I'll say a few words about outlook and then I'll hand you back to Karim for the strategic review and the Q&A. Here are the headlines. The message is that the performance in the first half is very much on track for delivery of our full year guidance. Organic revenue growth was 6.6%, broad-based across all four categories and in the top half of our guidance range for the year. Operating margin increased by 40 basis points on a constant currency basis, although there was a 70 basis point FX headwind. This was against high inflation in the first half, which will be significantly lower in the second, and I'll talk about that. Earnings per share were flat, as reported, but grew 4.5% on a constant currency basis. That was against an increase in financing costs in the first half, whereas financing costs will be flat in the second. So I'll talk about that. And then free cash flow to equity was much stronger this year, nearly $50 million stronger than it was last year. And that improvement came mostly in working capital. And finally in the headlines, after investing in the business with CapEx and with some M&A, we ended with leverage of 2.3 times, which was 0.2 times lower than the year before. I said the revenue growth was broad based across all four categories. In that bar across the top there, you can see the organic revenue percentages and then the dollar contribution from each category is in the bars on the graph. We're going to go through each category one by one. On the right, you can see some small tailwinds, excuse me, headwinds from our exit from the hospital care business back in 2022 and also from FX. So categories, wound care first at the top of this chart, organic growth was 6.7%. It was solid growth in Europe and in JEM despite some headwinds such as the anti-bribery and corruption campaign in China and some impacts from political reform in LATAM. We've said previously that we expect growth in these two regions to accelerate in the second half as the headwinds and the comparatives ease and we still expect that to be the case. In North America, the growth was double digit, and that included very strong growth in InnovaMatrix, where we haven't seen any impact so far from the draft LCD proposal, which we'll talk more about in a moment. And there was good growth as well in our flagship brand, Aquacell AG+. In Ostomy, Organic growth was 4.9%, which was a further acceleration on the first half of last year. It included double-digit growth in GEM, where we made some strong performances in important markets such as China and Brazil. And there was a good performance in Europe, supported by the new launch of Esteem Body, which is now selling in Italy, Poland and the Czech Republic. Start is very encouraging. And then in the USA, Home Services Group helped to build sales in the community arena. We are growing share in the USA with the support of our strong presence in accessories and new patient starts is positive. In continence care, organic growth was 8.2% and this came from strong volume growth in the USA. New customers coupled with great customer retention and supported by price increase with about 2.5% improvement in reimbursement for Medicare, which affects about half of our revenue. And then in Europe and in GEM, we're still very small, but sales grew very nicely, adding to the category's growth. And the new launch of GC Air for women in France was off to a very good start. And then infusion care is at the bottom of the chart. Organic growth 7.3%. This came from an increase in demand for our infusion sets in diabetes across a wide range of customers and also double digit growth outside of diabetes, particularly in Parkinson's therapies. We're diversifying customers and applications in that category. We said previously that growth would be faster in the second half of the year, and we still believe that, making it another year of high single-digit growth for InfusionCare. So now onto profitability. Operating margin increased by 40 basis points on a constant currency basis. Price and mix added 50 basis points in the first half. And operations productivity added 50 as well, as we made further progress on automation, on network optimization, and on continuous productivity improvement initiatives. Inflation was high in the first half. It was about 6%, which was a headwind of 220 basis points. We've said before, it takes time for changes in market prices to feed through into our results because we use FIFO accounting with an inventory of about just under six months and we operate cost hedging as well. On the way up. For prices, things take time to impact us, but on the way down as well. We still expect inflation for the full year to be in the range 3% to 5%. and so significantly lower in the second half as the benefits of those lower market price increases feed through. We made improvements through simplification and productivity in our commercial area, which benefited other OPECs and there were further benefits in G&A efficiency as we increased the scope of our global business services function and we further standardized our processes. So the improvements in price, mix, operations productivity and G&A efficiency will continue into the second half against a much lower inflation headwind and so the increase in operating margin will accelerate. Going further down the P&L, EPS as reported was flat. It increased 4.5% on a constant currency basis, but flat because the increase in operating profit was absorbed by a significant increase in financing cost based on the increases in market base rates through 2023. You can see that on the left hand side. In the middle there is half two where you see that operating profit growth will be faster because it will benefit from that lower inflation I've just mentioned. And financing costs will be flat year on year because the higher base rates were already in the numbers in the second half of 2023. So that will make the EPS growth in the second half faster and we're still on track for double digit growth for the full year. Cashflow. Cashflow was much stronger in this first half, nearly $50 million at the level of free cash to equity. EBITDA was better because of the higher sales. The big improvement was in working capital, where last year we were investing in inventory to make our supply chain more resilient. But that was completed last year. So in 2024 and going forward, we wouldn't expect working capital to grow any more than sales. CapEx was a bit lower because of timing. Interest was a bit higher for the reasons I've just mentioned. And that's all led to free cash to equity of $57 million. Remember, cash flow is seasonal. There's more free cash to equity in the second half of the year. And we are on track to deliver double digit growth in that free cash to equity in 2024. And probably worth mentioning, not on the chart, the dividend was higher because of the 3% increase and also because we stopped the script. And then we completed the contingent consideration payments for the Cure and Triad acquisitions for a total cost of $71 million. All that together meant net debt went up by $100 million, but leverage improved, as I've already said, to 2.3 times. So looking forward then on outlook and revenue first. Wound care unchanged from mid-single digits. We reduced it to mid-single digits in May from high single digits to reflect the uncertainty introduced by the draft LCD proposal. It's important to say we've not seen any impact from that in the market as yet. In fact, sales are growing very strongly and we're still opening new customer accounts. But there's no resolution of the uncertainty yet, so we want to stay cautious. If that LCD is implemented as drafted at the beginning of Q4, wound care growth would drop to mid-single digits. But we don't think that's likely. There's a reasonable probability, we think, that the draft will be delayed and or modified. And if that's the case and it has no impact on the market in 2024, growth in wound care would be high single digits. And in the meantime, we are continuing to generate and disseminate clinical evidence. We've got a real world evidence trial being published this year. We've initiated two RCTs, one in venous leg ulcer, one in diabetic foot ulcer, which Karim will talk about more later. We'll be launching InnovaMatrix outside the USA in the second half of this year. And we are growing sales in the indications for InnovaMatrix which are outside the scope of the draft LCD proposal. Vascular ulcers, pressure ulcers, dermatology is a big market opportunity outside that scope. On ostomy care guidance is unchanged at mid single digit. In continence care, we're increasing the guidance to high single digit based on the strong performance in the first half and the good momentum that category's got. And then in infusion care, likewise, unchanged, also at high single digit growth. So altogether, we're on track for the group to deliver in our guided range of 5% to 7%, and we think we'll be in the top half of that range. Profit and cash guidance is also unchanged. Operating profit margin expected to be at least 21% in constant currency. I've said that inflation will be lower in the second half than in the first half. Mixed price, productivity in operations and G&A efficiency will all contribute to improvements there. Earnings per share will be we're on track for double digit with lower finance cost or no finance cost growth in the second half and free cash flow to equity also on track for double digit growth despite high capex to continue to build the business capacity, automation and digital tools. And with adjusting items at a similar level to last year, approximately 20 million of cash. So looking further forward then, we're on track as well to deliver mid-20s in 2026, mid-20s operating margin in 2026 or 2027. And this chart's in two parts. On the left, it's a reminder of why we believe we're on track for 21% at least this year. Lower inflation in H2 and all those levers growing the margin. The levers to grow the margin stay the same going forward over the next few years. In recent years, Mix has been a big contributor as we have focused the business out of low margin, low growth activity into higher margin, high growth activity. Going forward, operations productivity is going to play a bigger part as our automation agenda rolls out, as the network optimization gets embedded, and as we continue to deliver on many continuous improvement productivity initiatives. Price and G&A will continue to contribute going forward and all that against inflation, which we expect to normalize. So on track for mid 20s by 2026 and 2027. And in summary, this is a chart you've seen before. It is the sustained organic growth of 5% to 7%, broad-based across all four categories. And that improvement in the operating margin, combined with strong cash control, which gives us confidence we'll be delivering double-digit growth in EPS and free cash to equity going forward. Thanks very much. I'll hand you back to Karim.
Thanks, Johnny. Okay. I think it's pretty clear that we had a strong performance in the first half of 2024 from a financial vantage point. Let's try to understand strategically what's been happening. This framework should be familiar to you. This is our FISB corporate strategy. Focus, innovate, simplify, build, and execute. And we've been going ahead and executing on this strategy, and our strategy is delivering sustainable and profitable growth. That's what we're striving for. When you look at focus, we've reconfigured the business to fundamentally have a chronic care business. Over 93% of our revenues are in the area of chronic care, and I'll talk to you more about that. Secondly, we're obsessed in the four categories and the 12 geographies that we focus on with the whole notion of customer loyalty. How do we drive customer loyalty with consumers and healthcare providers? And I'll be telling you more about how we do that. On the innovation front, we've more than doubled our investment in R&D. We're launching new products successfully. And in fact, we're underpinning these new products with a bolstering of our medical education and professional education efforts. About a year ago, we would have been on track to complete about 12 studies or trials. This year, we'll be completing 24. That's double the number. And I'll tell you more about why that's so significant for being able to drive primary demand. When it comes to the whole area of simplification, we're driving that in the area of operations, very much focused on automation and robotics, particularly when it comes to packaging lines. Significant room for improvement there. Second, we're optimizing our network. And you might say, well, what does that mean practically? Well, what it means is, for example, we've taken our facility in the Netherlands, which was subscale, not automated, shifted that production to Slovakia, much larger scale facility, much more efficient facility. That gives us clear cost savings. And lastly, we have a whole stream of continuous improvement initiatives where, for example, we'll look at our packaging and understand, are we using the right materials? Can we do a better job on procurement? Now, not only are we driving productivity in the area of quality and operations, but we're doing the same thing in G&A. We've rolled out global business services. We've broadened the scope of our global business services in terms of standard processes, standardizing systems, and that's driving G&A down. We're at 7.5%. Many of you will recall that several years ago, we would have been at 13 points of revenue. And we've committed to you that we're going to drive that GNA number to 7% or less. And we're confident we're going to do that, and there's room for improvement there. In terms of building capabilities, we've built capabilities in areas like pricing. We're leveraging our pricing center of excellence. And in the first half of the year, the pricing center of excellence, in collaboration with our business units, achieved an expansion of our gross margin of about 50 basis points. And then we're just executing a lot better across the entire value chain in areas such as commercial. where more and more of our call frequency is focused on A and B accounts. That number today is about 65%. Historically, it had been about 45%, and we're striving to get to 75%. And as you do that, what happens is flagship brands like AquaCell AG Extra, a $200 million brand, grows double digit and grows market share. Now, let's try to understand this FISB strategy, how is it actually working in practice from a focus perspective, and how is it actually working category by category? Focus. 93% of our revenues are chronic care. You might say, well, Crane, why is that so salient? Why that's so important? Well, it's important that we understand that fundamentally, this chronic care orientation is driven by underlying conditions. In the area of wound care, cardiovascular illnesses and complications, diabetes. In the area of ostomy care, colon cancer, bladder cancer. In the area of continence care, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries. In the area of infusion care, diabetes, Parkinson's disease, right? And what that basically does is it has us as a company, as Convitec, support all the various consumers and healthcare providers. And as a result of that, we have a very sticky model. So there's a recurring revenue aspect to this. Many of these consumers and patients are working with us for years and years and years. And let's try to understand this chronic nature of our business, how broad it is. And what you realize is in each and every category, we're pretty balanced. In fact, when you sum up all the categories that we compete in, they sum up to about $14 billion of market opportunity. And in each one of these categories, they're growing 4% to 8%. They're substantial growth. And in each instance, we're either growing at the same rate as that category or growing faster. And so we find ourselves in a situation where our competitive position is very strong. We're consistently a top three player in each and every one of these categories. Now, beyond having a broad and diversified chronic care business where we're executing better, we're also in the midst of launching a lot of new and exciting products. We're in the midst of launching seven new products currently, and we'll be adding, sorry, eight currently, and we'll be adding an additional seven here in 25 and 26. And what I'd like to highlight to you about this chart is that all these new products are across all four categories. There is breadth to this portfolio. There is richness. And here shortly I'll be describing to you how in each and every category we're successfully launching these new products. And that ought to give you confidence in terms of CombiTech's long-term growth prospects. So let's look at our wound care business, okay? So how do we strengthen our competitive position? The first thing we do is we invest in medical and clinical. So recently we completed a randomized control study. This was a non-inferiority study carried out across a whole series of countries and we compared AquaCell AG Extra to the standard of care, what is commonly carried out. Okay. And what we were able to demonstrate was in fact superiority. That's a really big deal. Okay. It's very, very rare that you demonstrate superiority. 75% of the wounds were fully healed when using AquaCell AG Extra. These were venous leg ulcers we're talking about. Standard of care, 56%. That means there's more than a 30% likelihood that if you use AquaCell AG Extra, you're going to have that wound fully healed. In addition, we ran real-world evidence studies, okay, across many, many countries, about 700 patients. And we tried to understand in the real world how would we perform. We collaborated with thought leaders around the world and introduced a wound hygiene protocol. Four key steps. The first thing is you got to cleanse the wound. Step two, you got to go ahead and debride the wound. Step three, you got to go ahead and refashion the wound. And then lastly, you use the appropriate wound dressing. We were trying to raise the standard of care on a global basis. And when we do that, follow the wound hygiene protocol, and utilize AquaCell AG Extra, guess what? 94% of wounds either improve or fully heal. That's a big deal, right? So when you combine the fact that we're strengthening our competitive position through medical education, guess what? We're also launching new products very successfully. We're launching ConvaFoam. We've launched in the US. Our win rate in terms of evaluations continues to be above 50%. And we're now going to be in the midst of actually launching it in Europe, right? We've actually received regulatory clearance to be able to do that in Europe and the UK. And we're very excited about that. Above and beyond that, Innova Matrix. It's doing incredibly well in the marketplace. It keeps on growing double digit. And we're in the midst of going ahead and getting ready to launch it now outside the United States here in the second half of 2024. Now, there have been many questions about ANOVA matrix, right? The LCD and what does it mean and where are you going, et cetera, et cetera. So I'm going to spend a little extra time now to really focus on ANOVA matrix. But as I do that, I want to make sure that you have three key takeaways. The first one is ANOVA matrix has a great clinical and scientific profile. It works really, really well. Two. We have initiated randomized control studies on ANOVA matrix in diabetic foot ulcers and venic leg ulcers. They're up and running. Three, fundamentally, ANOVA matrix will be a driver of growth for CombiTech, short-term, medium-term, and long-term. I hope I've been reasonably clear. Let's double-click. Strong scientific and clinical profile. Why do you make that claim? First of all, let's remember that Inova Matrix was cleared by the Food and Drug Administration in October of 2020. And it was cleared as a medical device. That's important because the hurdle bar for a medical device is very, very high. When the Macs assessed and developed their draft proposed LCD, they evaluated over 200 different products. Less than 50 of those are medical devices. And in fact, what we had to go ahead and do was demonstrate substantial equivalence. That's not my term, that's the Food and Drug Administration's term, substantial equivalence. So we demonstrated both scientifically and clinically that in essence, from a clinical and physical endpoint perspective, we were comparable and we met all the physical and clinical endpoints and were able to demonstrate that we were safe and effective for wound healing. That's a big deal, right? We were cleared by the Food and Drug Administration. Now you might say, great that the regulatory, the regulator, excuse me, gave you a thumbs up. What about physicians and nurses who have been using this product for two years? How do they feel about it? Here we go. Here are just two random quotes from thought leaders in the United States. Dr. Rader is very well known, okay? He's a podiatrist and what he tells you is it consistently delivers. We have another key thought leader who tells us, man, the speed at which the wound heals, incredible. And here's a real picture of a case study from Dr. Oldani. Dr. Oldani is a podiatrist in St. Louis, Missouri. When you look at that foot there, you can very quickly see we've got a type 2 diabetes patient who clearly has a diabetic foot ulcer, comorbidities, hypercholesterolemia. Hypertension. This food is at risk of being amputated. When you utilized, and when he utilized, Inova Matrix over the course of several months, guess what? That wound healed. Key messages, Inova Matrix really works. Don't mark my words. Talk to clinicians who are actively using it. What about any evidence? Do we have any evidence? Well, here's a study that will be published later on this year. This is a real-world evidence study. We worked with IntelliCure Analytics. They're the leading entity in the United States, over 500 wound care centers. They went in and analyzed and said, how did InovaMatrix perform? And what you see here is that 53% of the wounds were fully healed. As a benchmark, typically in this kind of cohort, 40% or less of wounds would heal. And what's interesting is that our cohort was really tough because typically about 15% of patients that are assessed in a real world evidence study, about 15, have life or limb-threatening situation. In our case, it was 44%, about 3x. So we had really an acid test. And nevertheless, we performed really, really well. So what I'm trying to tell you is that Inova Matrix really works. Clinicians see it. The regulatory sees it. We see it in terms of evidence. So what are we going to do about it? The first thing we want to note is that when you look at the whole market in the United States, 55% of the market is not DFU and VLU, diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers. Let's clarify that. 55%. So now we're focused on the 45% where the LCD was focused on, right? And when you look at this slide, look at the top half, first of all. I'm going to talk a little bit about evidence for a second. And what you'll note is that currently in terms of real world evidence, we're publishing data here in the second half. I've given you a snippet of what you'll be seeing, right? I just did that. The 53%, you just saw the graph. I already told you we're in the midst of initiating randomized control studies in diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers. We'll be reporting the randomized control study data in roughly the 2026 timeframe period. What does that practically mean? It means that both in the hospital channel or point of care and in the outpatient point of care, we'll go ahead and expand our coverage. Now you might be saying, well, there's uncertainty tied to the LCD. How does this all work? Well, it's actually quite simple. You've got a worst case scenario that in essence says, hey, the LCD is going to be implemented just the way it's been drafted. Yes, that will create headwinds for us, particularly in 2025. What is more likely, and we think there's a reasonable probability that this will occur, is that the LCD will be modified and or delayed. If that occurs, that gives us time to be able to complete the randomized control studies, report out, and actually get broader coverage. And then you've got the last situation, which is actually the LCD is eliminated, and that creates even more upside. But the bottom line is, a nova matrix works, we're gonna be getting more broad coverage, and it's gonna be a key growth driver for us, short term, medium term, and long term. I hope that was clear. Let's move on to another very exciting area, ostomy care. So what's happening there? We're growing new patient starts in the United States. It's an important signal. We've got a lot of really great team selling occurring. Our clinical team is working well with our sales team. We're working well with the home service group. And so that's helping us grow our business. On a global basis, in fast-growing segments like the convex segment, the accessory segment, we're actually outgrowing the growth rates there. And esteemed body is off to a really strong start. What you've got with Esteem Body is a new product where you've got the great Combatec adhesive base plate. It doesn't cause skin irritation. It doesn't cause leakage. But now we've also got a really discreet pouch. And so you can see, for example, in Italy where the rate of new patient starts has increased by more than two and a half times. So clearly we're growing that business. And we're not stopping there. We're underpinning the new products with medical education and clinical education. So we recently ran, for example, a global convexity summit. We had over 12,000 health care providers participate. So a lot of interest in this whole theme and topic, a lot of interest in Esteem Body. And so what are we going to be doing moving forward? We're going to continue to expand the launch of Esteem Body on a worldwide basis, including markets in the US, Europe, global emerging markets. But also, we're in the midst of being very much on track to launch Natura Body, which is our two-piece soft convex. The steam body is a one-piece. We'll be launching our two-piece Natura Body in 2026. What about Continence Care? What's happening in Continence Care? Again, a terrific business. When you look at Continence Care, we really provide outstanding service and outstanding products. On the service side, we've got world-class net promoter scores. Amazing levels of loyalty. with consumers, with healthcare providers. And you might say, well, how do you do that? I see the statistic, the 80 plus, right? How do you actually do that? In practical terms, what it means is that we've selected the very best people to be able to connect and dialogue with these consumers, but we also invest heavily in technology. So for example, we've introduced now a new AI-based platform that allowed us to reduce the waiting time by more than 50%. Already, if you called the home service group in the United States, you would wait on the phone about 30 seconds. I don't think that's that long. And we've cut that by more than 50%. That's what we mean by world-class service. Now, we've combined that with some great technology. We have a proprietary feel-clean technology. This proprietary field clean technology relates to the fact that when you're using a catheter four to six times a day, you don't want any friction. Friction would be bad. So we have a superiority claim from the Food and Drug Administration for superior comfort and less stickiness. And what you really are trying to do is to make sure you're not damaging the urethra. You don't want to harm the urethral cells. And now we've actually got scientific evidence that we don't harm the urethral cells, and we do that to a 30% lesser degree than the current standard. So clearly this field clean technology, which is very hydrophilic in nature, water loving, it is the third generation and the most advanced hydrophilic technology that provides superior comfort and goes ahead and make sure that it's a lot less sticky. So then what's happening geographically? Well, in the United States, we're the number one player as a service company with a number two player as a manufacturer. And when you look at the composition of our portfolio, Approximately 60% of our revenues are hydrophilic catheters. And if you're wondering if the market moves to more hydrophilic, that is good for Convitec. Let me say that again. If the market moves more to hydrophilic, that is good for Convitec for the avoidance of any doubt. And by the way, when you look at our new products, right, and you see how we're growing globally, we're leveraging the Feel Clean technology. It is cutting edge hydrophilic technology. And so we've launched, for example, GCR for women. in France. It's growing segment share very, very rapidly. We're going to go ahead and expand that launch to other European markets and the United States, so that bodes well for growth. And above and beyond that, we're taking that same feel clean technology, and we're going to be looking to launch GC Air for Men in 2026. So let's go to InfusionCare. I've given you a lot of stats, a lot of numbers, and I thought I'd love to share with you a story. This is a real story. So the story here is about a gentleman by the name of Damien Gath. Damien's from Derbyshire. He's 52 years old. And unfortunately, at age 42, Damien was diagnosed with having severe Parkinson's. He's a father, he's married, and he and his lovely spouse have four children, right? And he's been having to go ahead and take over 20 pills a day, right? And so many of you know that AbbVie launched ProDuodopa for the treatment of severe Parkinson's. And it's a dual suspension with a pump, and it uses our proprietary innovative infusion set. And what I'd like to do now is to show you a video where you can kind of get a sense of What was it like for Damien before using this innovative ProDuodopa with our proprietary infusion set? And what's it like after? He's one of the very first patients in the UK to benefit from this intervention. And literally here in the month of July is when he started using it. Without any further ado, let me show you the video. This is the before. Let's try to make some coffee. This is him after. I don't know about you, but I was incredibly touched when I saw that. And it just reminds us of what we actually do at Combatech, right? We have a brand promise, forever caring. We talk about pioneering trusted medical solutions to improve the lives we touch. And clearly here, we've touched a life. So I think it's very, very telling. Let's shift gears for a second. Infusion care, how's that business doing? It's doing very well. The reality is in the diabetes space, we've been... broadening the number of customers we're working with. We continue to partner very effectively with Medtronic and Tandem Diabetes, but we're also now growing and working with other key partners, such as, say, Ypsomed and Beta Bionics. So they're all doing very, very well as insulin pump therapy continues to develop in the marketplace. In addition, we've diversified our business into non-diabetes-oriented applications. You saw the example here with Damien in areas such as Parkinson's. in areas such as pain management and immunoglobulin therapy. So fundamentally, this is a really healthy business. Honestly, we're challenged with keeping up with demand. There's very strong demand for our offering. And so we're going to continue to grow this business. It'll grow, again, high single digit this year. And it'll continue to grow year after year in that high single digit arena or area. Let me try to summarize at this point. Hopefully, what you've gotten a sense of is that in the first half of the year, we went ahead and delivered strong broad based organic revenue growth and are very much on track to expand the operating margin. We also grew our earnings and free cash flow. When you think about 2024, I'm here to confirm to you that once again, we're going to go ahead and deliver the five to 7% organic revenue growth. We'll be at the upper half of that range. We will achieve at least a 21% operating profit margin in constant currency. And we'll go ahead and grow double digit our EPS and free cash flow. From a medium term perspective, look, we've got a very bright future. And in essence, you find a business which is chronic care oriented. It's got very attractive characteristics to it. We've got a strong competitive position there. And this chronic care business where we've got strong competitive positions in all four categories is underpinned by a whole series of new products that are going to be launching again across all four categories. And so then you say, well, what does that mean in terms of financials? What that translates into is you ought to be expecting double digit growth in EPS and free cash flow year in and year out on a compounded annual growth basis. On that note, I'm going to say thank you, and we'll open it up for questions. Okay. Hassan had his hand go up very quickly. Sit down first. Sit down first. We'll start. Let's just go by row, maybe, if that's okay. May I start with Veronica? Is that okay, Hassan? We'll let Veronica go. I'll just go row. Go ahead, Veronica. Okay.
Sorry, they're waving at you. Could you please pick up the mic, which is in the seat? It's right on your side. Yeah. Sorry about that. I think it's for those who are online listening. Those in the front row have mics in the armrests, and the others have mics behind the chair. Maybe just introduce yourself.
Perfect. Hopefully this works. Veronica Dubaiba from Citi. There we go. Excellent. So three questions for me, if I can, please. The first one's just a little bit of housekeeping for you, Johnny, which is the mid-20s midterm EBIT margin. Can you confirm whether that's reported or constant currency? And I guess if it is constant currency, maybe just give us an update on what's the FX headwind that you will have accumulated by the end of this year since you gave that mid-20s target. So what would it be in reported terms then? So that's my first question. My second question is just, you know, trying to understand a little bit if I look at the wound care business stripping out to Nova Matrix. If I look at the math, I think we were at about 3 to 4% in the first half of the year, which obviously we haven't seen everybody report yet in the market, but it doesn't seem like a ton of share momentum. I know you flagged LATAM and China, so maybe if you can talk to what the growth is like excluding those two. And your degree of confidence that you can keep winning market share in that traditional wound care market, given where the first half came in. And then my final question is on inflation. If I look at the sort of disclosure you had given us last year. It doesn't look like inflation abated at all really in the first half of this year. I think the headwind was 250 or 270 basis points last year. It's 220 this year. Very modest improvement. So maybe just talk through what gives you confidence that indeed you will see a meaningful easing in that inflationary headwind in the back half of the year. Thank you.
So that's it, one and three?
Sure.
Yeah. So, on the mid-20s margin FX, we didn't qualify that with an FX condition when we issued that guidance. So, no, it wasn't stated in constant currency. That said, I guess it's underpinned by... roughly around these levels. If something extreme were to happen, we might need to revisit. But in the current and recent range of FX, we're still on target, on track very much for mid-20s as a reported margin. And that's, by the way, why we've got a bit of slack in the time period, because there are some external uncontrollables, mostly inflation and FX, which we wanted to be cautious about. On your inflation point... You're right that it didn't abate much in the first half. And that's because, you know, we have just a bit less than six months of inventory. And with FIFO accounting, you know, the inventory we sold in the first half of 2024 was mostly manufactured in 2023. And I think we've previously said it takes six months or more for external price effects to flow through our results. But the inventory we'll be selling in the second half of 2024 was mostly made in the first half. You know, it's obviously not quite as simple as that. The inventory does co-mingle. But that gives us very good visibility over what the inflation number is going to be in the second half because the inventory has already been made. That and the fact that we hedge our costs on a rolling basis, and that's typically over about six months. So those hedges roll off over time. And so just to reconfirm, we said at the beginning of the year, we thought inflation for this year would be in the range 3% to 5%, and we still do.
Yeah, on the wound care market share, look, I think the reality is that we've got a really strong portfolio, Veronica. So clearly you've got the Innova Matrix situation, and there's some uncertainty around that, which I think we discussed amply today. I think when I look at the rest of the portfolio, I'm very pleased with how AquaCell AG Extra is performing, and that really is our flagship brand in the antimicrobial segment. Obviously, we're growing our business in the foam area. We've introduced now CombiFoam. We'll be expanding that into the European marketplace also here in this half of the year. We're already in the second half. From my vantage point, my level of confidence is high. Yes, in the first half of the year, we still had an impact from the China situational ab cam situation. I think the comparator becomes a lot easier, honestly, in the second half. So I think that'll come down. In Latin America, John, you alluded to this, particularly in places like Colombia, there's been some healthcare reform. which, frankly, again, we've had to adjust and adapt to how the payer is working, but that's working its way through. So I think the whole idea of being able to be in that mid to high single digit, so in essence the business grows at mid single digit, if you take out significant contribution from Innova Matrix, I think that's reasonable. On the other hand, if you also include Innova Matrix, you get to high single digit, and that's pretty consistent with how we've guided. That's what I would say. Okay, why don't we go to Hassan and then I'll check in.
Hi, morning. Hassan Al-Wakil from Barclays. Three for me. Firstly, could you talk about why you expect a positive impact from reimbursement changes in continents, given the margin differential could be quite significant when distributing third-party product? You note that the sales mix is 60% hydrophilic, but this may be skewed somewhat by higher priced hydrophilic catheters on the manufacturing side. So it'd be very helpful to know what the volume mix is and how that splits distribution versus manufacturing. Secondly, on 2025, Karim, could you talk about the potential offsets to biologics reimbursement changes, be it in over matrix itself or further afield in the portfolio? And if the 5% to 7% growth target is still a realistic ambition for 2025 in a scenario where you lose the physician office business. And then finally, on margin guidance, could you talk about the building blocks and achieving the ramp? needed to hit the implied H2 margin and the rationale for retaining the wording of above rather than around. And with the new FX headwind that you've talked about, do you think consensus at 21.4 is too high? Thank you.
Okay, so there's a little bit on continence care and catheters, biologics, what's happened sort of in that worst-case scenario in 2025, and I think... a little bit about margin guidance this year. So maybe I'll take questions one and two, Johnny, and then let you take question three. Does that work? Yeah. So look, I think the way to think about continence care is currently there are basically three reimbursement codes in the United States. Okay. And, uh, there've been a movement amongst some who said, Hey, we want 19. And I think basically CMS said, Hmm, be very British in how I describe it. That seems a tad bit too much. Okay. So I think the reality is that there was a whole series of distinctions that were trying to be made and fundamentally from a scientific and clinical perspective, which is what we prefer to focus on, there is evidence that, hey, if you're using a hydrophilic catheter, there can be some benefits in terms of urinary tract infection reduction. So when we look at it, frankly, regardless of whether it's a third party catheter or our own, guess what, in terms of margin, right? on a per unit basis, hydrophilic is very attractive. I'm not going to get into numbers. I'm just going to tell you it's very, very attractive. And then the reality is that our own portfolio, which is growing, right, is very hydrophilic oriented. And because we have a formidable service company, let's just say that we have a lot of credibility in the marketplace as to what might be valuable for a consumer or healthcare provider to use. So fundamentally, net-net, we benefit in that equation. On the biologics question, look, I think the reality is that we've gone ahead and guided for our medium-term guidance to be 5% to 7% year in and year out. We talked about the LCD where we think there is a reasonable probability that that LCD will be modified or delayed. In the case, if that were not to be the case, again, I think it's fair to say that we had anticipated historically that it would be some downward pricing pressure on Innova Matrix. And what I can say is that we've got a really rich portfolio in wound care, whether that's AquaCell AG Extra, whether that's ConvaFoam, whether that's all of our hydrocolloid portfolio, whether that's new products coming about also, right? And I haven't talked at all about ConvaNiox, which is all about the nitric oxide technology. I haven't spoken at all about single-use negative pressure wound therapy, which is very much on track. You saw it up on the chart, right? So it's a rich portfolio in wound care. And then we've got a very broad portfolio in ostomy care, continence care, and infusion care. So overall, I'd say I'm cautiously optimistic. I'll pass the last question on to Johnny.
Yeah, H2 margin. Look, in the first half, we added 270 basis points to margin before inflation. And then inflation was a headwind of 220. Now what we've said is inflation in the second half is going to be a lot less. And if you just do the arithmetic to the range we're aiming for you know you'll see inflation comes in at you know, a third to a half of what it was in the first half of the year. So that means the headwind drops below 100 basis points in the second half compared to 220 in the first half. And that in itself gives you sufficient, you know, if you, so what I would guide to is the levers under our control will contribute, continue to contribute roughly the same and inflation will drop right away. And that gives you the bridge you need to get to the expectations that we have set. I think you asked why are we still saying at least 21% because nothing has changed. We are still on track to deliver the margin expansion that we thought we would be at the beginning of the year. Now, as to consensus, look, if you do that sum in terms of inflation, you will get to somewhere, 20 21 plus and then you've got a form of view on a few on fx uh you know the pound has moved over about five percent in the last couple of months so you know that's obviously not good for our margin that's where the tailwind has come from at the beginning of the year excuse me the headwind has come from um at the beginning of the year there was very little headwind And that has developed recently. So you'll have to form a view on FX. You can do that just as everyone else can.
OK. Oh, sorry. We had one more up front. I apologize.
Morning, it's Sam England from Berenberg. Just two questions around Inova Matrix. Firstly, can you talk a bit about the work you're doing to expand Inova Matrix in new indications and points of care and how quickly you think that can progress? And are you reallocating resources from the physician's office to the hospital channel? as a result of the potential changes. And then also on Anova Matrix, can you talk about the go-to-market and pricing strategy for the product outside of the U.S., given that the biologics market has been sort of slow to develop outside of the U.S. historically?
Yeah, look, so I think within the U.S., I highlighted this to you, that if you take away DFU and VLU, so diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers, there's still 55% of the market there. And the reality is that we have clearance from the Food and Drug Administration for 15 indications. Okay, literally 15. So that means 13 above and beyond DFU and VLU. And the reality is that in the Dermatology space as an example where we talk about Mohs, which is basically surgery if you've had skin cancer, right? It works really well. We're getting really positive feedback from dermatologists. It works really well in pressure ulcers. It works really well in vascular ulcers. And I could keep on going on and on. And so clearly we're very rapidly growing that business as you can imagine. And so I would expect that as we continue to move through the year, that portion of our business is going to continue to grow in an important manner. In terms of the OUS opportunity, I think that OUS opportunity exists both in places like Europe and Latin America. We've got a very strong, frankly, commercial infrastructure that we can leverage. And we've been pretty busy, frankly, trying to focus on how we can go ahead and introduce it into those marketplaces. There really is a need for a biologic in those markets. And again, if you've made the investment in R&D, you've made the investment in quality operations, you can imagine that marginal dollar is very valuable to you. And so we'll talk more about it as the time progresses. But I think you'll see us going ahead and being pretty darn successful in that arena. Maybe go to Anshu. We can't hear you, sorry.
Can you hear me?
Hello? Better, thank you.
Hi, good morning. It's Anshul Verma from JP Morgan. I have two questions, please. One is on the midterm guide and perhaps building a bit more from Hassan's question. Bare case scenario, if Innova Matrix and the LCD goes through as it is, if we exclude Innova Matrix, Is that high single-digit growth target for advanced wound care still possible? And on the flip side, on the continence care side, do you think the growth momentum continues such that there's upside risk to the mid-single-digit target there? And then secondly, just a bit more housekeeping on phasing of growth for H2O. How should we think of that between Q3 and Q4? Is it sequential improvement or a bit more equal weighted? Are there any phasing dynamics we need to be aware of?
Okay, let me try to take the two questions. So on the medium-term guide, let me be really clear. Innova Matrix will be a growth driver, okay? I'll just say that again. For the medium-term guide, Innova Matrix will be a growth driver, okay? It works incredibly well clinically. It's got really strong scientific profile. So the only thing we're talking about in a worst case scenario is that, hey, in 2025, we may be challenged, right? And we'll experience a headwind. So when you think about 26, 27, 28, 29, I can keep it all going, the NOVA matrix will be a growth driver, okay? So I hope I've been clear on that one. Risk on CC to the upside. It's too early to say. I think this year we're confident we're going to deliver the high single digit. Clearly our ambition for all businesses would be to grow at high single digit. But again, we've always tried to be grounded in terms of how we go ahead and guide. So as we strengthen our position in CC, in continence care, as we go ahead and continue to sustain really great service levels, as we continue to see improvement and successful new product launches, then that's going to give us more confidence. But again, we don't want to get giddy at this point. So I think it's premature at this point. I'd say the same thing with ostomy care, right? If you could fast forward, I'd love to do that. I say that to Johnny sometimes, saying, could I fast forward the movie? I'd love to be able to tell you, you know, steam bodies launched all over the place, and the Tura bodies launched all over the place. We're executing impeccably commercially all over the place, and we've got all the capacity and automation we need. But we can see that happening. So let's stay grounded. I think that from a medium-term perspective to say that wound care can grow high single digit, yes, tick. Infusion care can grow high single digit, yes, tick. And ostomy care and continence care can grow mid-single digit. And clearly we have that ambition to see if we can get those to grow even faster.
And then on the phasing point, we're not calling anything out at the moment, nothing specific between Q3 and Q4. We try to avoid getting into short-term phasing too much.
Perfect. Thank you. Okay. Kane, you want to go for it?
Sorry, Graham. Maybe just move away from the LCDs, give you guys a break. Just on ABV and the FDA rejection of the drug, just wondering for 24, I imagine you didn't really have anything in there, but just wondering what, if anything, was in for 25, or is it just a case of we wait for them to do their part? on the approval side, and then we kind of build it in. Bearing in mind, you've probably been growing quite nicely there outside of diabetes anyway, I would imagine, but just maybe a little bit on that. And just on the pipeline, I mean, obviously, I think you said eight products or seven products over the next two to three years. How are we looking there? And just how much of maybe the last 12 months of growth has come from new products? Thanks.
Yeah, so look, on the question about AbbVie and ProDuodopa, the reality is we wait for them to basically launch and then we build it in. So we're kind of more on the prudent side. I think what's exciting about ProDuodopa, it's doing incredibly well in Japan and Europe. I think that it's at least meeting, if not exceeding, AbbVie's expectations in terms of how it's performing clinically. So I think they're going to work through this third party supplier that had some challenges. So I would anticipate 2025, they ought to be able to get no full approval from the Food and Drug Administration. And I think it's a very big opportunity. You can see from the example we gave you, it really does make a big difference. In terms of the pipeline, look, what I would say is that clearly the new product pipeline is contributing growth. We've not broken it out. I don't think it'd be appropriate to go ahead and do that. But it is meaningful and important. And as you can imagine, in our kind of a business, having a continual stream of innovation is important. incredibly important. And so you'll continue to see us increasing our investment in R&D. You'll continue to see us working on rapid iterations, new platforms, breakthrough technologies, investing even more in clinical evidence. I mean, that is a deliberate strategy on our part. And so I think that bodes well that if you're looking from an investment thesis perspective for a business that's going to grow sustainably and profitably year in and year out, I think it's a good place to be. Graham.
There we go. Thank you. Graham from UBS. Can I go back to the LCDs? You made a comment around you think a reasonable scenario is that it's delayed or changed. What's that based on?
Yeah. It's a good question. So, look, we try to keep our ear to the ground as much as possible. So you can imagine there's a whole series of stakeholders. It wouldn't be appropriate for me to point, you know, to any one specific stakeholder. But I think what I would say is that when you go out and have dialogues with the various stakeholders, that would be one element. Two, I think the LCD, the way it's been drafted, is actually quite problematic from a regulatory and legal perspective. So you can imagine that we've assessed it from that vantage point. So look, let's just wait and see how it plays itself out. But I think that it's a reasonable assumption to say, look, there is a reasonable chance or probability that the LCD will be modified or adjusted. And I think that, frankly, if you do your work across the industry, I think that view goes above and beyond Computex. I think there's quite a few folks who maybe have that view. And I'll leave it at that.
And then just to follow up on InfusionCare, we haven't talked about patch pumps for a while. Can you give us an update on where you might be in that scenario when you think you might have an offer?
We had so many last year. This was our first one. Look, what I'll just say is we're very encouraged by all the developments. I think I've shared on a variety of occasions that our technology can be leveraged both with durable pumps and patch pumps. That clearly is the case. I would say there's strong desire on part of different partners to work with us in that arena. So I'm cautiously optimistic in that arena. Stay tuned. Maybe ask me the same exact question, maybe in about six months, and I'll look forward to the question. I'll leave it at that. Okay, let's shift gears. Or shift sides, I should say. Okay.
Thank you. Marion Billot from Bank of America. Just one follow-up on the LCD. Has Medicare provided you the guidelines to get back on the list if you're excluded, or is it something that they provide when they publish the final?
Yeah, to the best of our knowledge, Medicare has not provided any guidelines at this point in time.
Hi there, Jack Reynolds-Clark from RBC. Thank you for taking the questions. I had a couple, please. One following up on Sam's question around XUS in over matrix. Was this part of the plan originally? And what kind of timeframe do you expect to see meaningful growth here contributing? And is there kind of a meaningful change in the kind of cost associated with that versus your original plan? And then on Convofoam, Again, just on XUS launch there, what are your timing expectations and which markets are you targeting?
Sure. So, look, Jack, I'd say that on a NOVA matrix OES, we'd always plan on launching OUS. We've got a great commercial and clinical infrastructure, and so very much is executing the plan, if that makes sense there. And as I said earlier, there really is strong demand amongst clinicians to have an extracellular matrix that performs like a NOVA matrix. And so as we continue to generate more real-world evidence, more RCTs, it only makes sense to you know, make that available to our customers. On ConvaFoam, look, we've gotten clearance now, so we have our CE mark for Europe, so that's all basically continental Europe. We've also gotten clearance from the UK regulatory authorities, so you know all the major key European markets. So we're very, very focused on starting there. But here in the course of the next 12, 18 months, you'll see us roll it out. And then obviously we're looking also to introduce ConvaFoam in global emerging markets. So it's a global brand for us, and we're just in the midst of continuing to roll it out.
And on the costs question, it was always part of the plan, both of those things. So there's no new costs that aren't already in guidance.
Is there a change of facing of those costs? No. No. No.
Christian, I think. Hi. Hi. Christian Glennie with Stifel. Just on Innova Matrix, continuing on the theme, just what more can you share around the design of these RCTs that you've said you've kicked off? Can we assume it's one each in DFU, VLU, patient numbers, comparator, arms, and cost ultimately in terms of is it part of your cost profile?
Yeah.
So let's say that we tend to be prudent, so they're of an appropriate size. We have a pretty clear sense of what standard of care is, right? So that's what you would do in an RCT. And I think that in terms of cost, we'd always planned on making these investments. So this isn't anything new, by the way, for us. The strategy typically when you have a 510k approach, right, which is, you know, you get approved as a medical device through the FDA, you start off typically via Medicare, but you know very well that for the private payer, you're going to need to have additional clinical evidence. So we'd always planned on doing this. We've looked at all the current clinical evidence that we have, and then based on that clinical evidence, analyzed the entire plethora of other folks that have run RCTs. We're not going to be the first ones doing this. We've drawn the conclusion as to how to design it, what the sample size is, what the arms are, when are we going to carry out interim analyses, final analyses, prepare reports, et cetera, et cetera. So we're just frankly focused on executing right now, and we're on track.
And then can I follow up on, in terms of the timing, I think, if I recall correctly, I'm not sure, but from your May training update, you said you'd probably start those trials towards the end of this year. It feels like you've brought that forward. Is that with... with the expectation that maybe the fact that you've got a trial up and running may help you in terms of those LCDs. And ultimately, is there flex as well in the design of those trials, given that the goalposts may yet move in terms of what they deem to be a rigorous clinical trial?
Yeah. So I'll answer the second question first. Is there a flex and modularity in the design? Absolutely, yes. So that's the first answer to your question. So we've contemplated that. And then B, really, look, in terms of what we communicated historically, it was more, hey, in the second half, we would anticipate. We've got more clarity now. And because we're in the midst of initiating those trials, we're being more concrete and more specific on the exact timing.
Hi. I couldn't get that mic to work, that's why I had to use this.
John, I'm from .
I just had a follow-up question on the OUS launch of Innova Matrix. Historically, I think one of the main reasons why skin substitutes have not really taken off outside of the US is the varying regulatory regimes in different countries. Is there anything specifically about Innova Matrix which makes you think those regulatory hurdles will be easier to overcome? And then my second question is on ConvaFoam. I think you said the growth of foam in the first half was like single digits, but you said that you're winning over 50% of appraisals. So just a little bit more context on what that actually means when you say you're winning over 50% of appraisals in terms of does it lead to orders or is it just on the formulary? Are you winning tenders? And when that is likely to come through into the growth rate for the phone business, please.
Yeah. Um, Maybe I'll take the regulatory one and let you handle the phone one. Does that work? So look, I don't think there's anything specific or unique to Innova Matrix through a pure regulatory lens. I think each one of the various geographies has its regulatory requirements. What I would say is that based on its clinical profile and what we'll be able to see in the United States, our level of confidence of being able to, frankly, meet the regulatory requirements is actually pretty darn high. And so, again, I think you'll see us make progress there on the regulatory front. We'll leverage all of our clinical data. And then commercially, we have a pretty darn strong commercial infrastructure, both in the hospital setting and in the outpatient setting, and many of the key 12 markets in which we really focus on. Those are FISB 12, we refer to them as. On the foam side, maybe I'll let you comment, Jamie.
There are two separate points. So the mid-single digit growth reference doesn't refer to Convofoam because Convofoam is still very small. So that's all the rest of our foam products which are continuing to grow at mid-single digits. It's not a bad performance considering obviously Convofoam is a better product and yet the old stuff is still growing solidly in the market. We're very happy with the ComboFone product. What we mean with the evaluations, we are getting more and more evaluations with customers in the US where we've already launched. And we're continuing to win in those evaluations more than 50% of the time. But it's a slow process. And the timing is not really in our gift. The timing is governed by when the customers want to run evaluations and then how long it takes them to go through from the healthcare provider evaluating the product to it going through the procurement committees and other approval steps within each customer organization. So it's building, it's promising, promising results, really good from a clinical perspective, but it's slow.
I think they're done, Karim. Okay, wow. No more LCD questions, huh? Okay, look, just a huge thank you to all of you. Thanks for your engagement and support, and we look forward to being in touch.