This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk02: Thank you very much. Good morning and thank you for joining us for our third quarter 2022 conference call. A few messages to start with. In the first nine months of this year, revenue has increased by close to 5%. and adjusted BDA has increased by 4.3% on a comparable basis, while cash available for distribution increased by 6.2%, up to $179 million. Net corporate debt, the ratio stood at three times as of the end of September, providing us with significant financial flexibility. And regarding growth, we have committed close to $150 million in new investments in storage and EV. With that, I will turn the call over to Francisco, who will take you through our financial results.
spk01: Thank you, Santiago, and good morning to everyone. Please turn to slide number four, where I will present our key financials for the first nine months of 2022. Revenue reached $858 million, which represents a 4.9% growth on a comparable basis, excluding the effect from the non-recurring solar project we discussed last year and foreign exchange. Adjusted EBITDA amounted to $631 million, representing an increase of 4.3% on the same comparable basis. Regarding cash flow for distribution, we generated $179 million in the first nine months of 2022, an increase of 6.2% year over year. On the following slide, number five, you could see our performance by geography and business sector. In North America, revenue increased by 5% to $324 million in the first nine months of 2022, while EBITDA increased by 6% thanks to the assets we recently acquired in the United States. In South America, revenue and EBITDA both increased by 5%, to $123.95 million, respectively, thanks to the recent acquisitions. Revenue in the Maya region decreased by 20% in the first nine months of 2020 to 2022, mainly due to foreign exchange impact and the non-recurring effect mentioned previously. EBITDA in the Maya region decreased by 8% in the first nine months of 2022, mostly due to FX impact and the one-time gain in the first quarter of 2021. Excluding this impact, revenue would have grown at 4.9% and EBITDA by 2.6%. Looking below at the results by business sector, we can see similar effects. Let's now please turn to slide number six, where we will review our operational performance. Electricity produced by our renewable assets reach 4,155 gigawatt hours in the first nine months of 2022, an increase of 20 percent versus the same period of 2021. The increase was largely due to the contribution of assets recently acquired. Looking at our availability-based contracts, once again, ACT continues to show solid performance. In transmission lines and water, the two other sectors where our revenue is based on availability, we continue to achieve high availability levels. Now let's please turn to slide number seven to walk you through our cash flow for the first nine months of 2022. Our operating cash flow reached 516 million, strong 16.7% increase compared to the first nine months of 2021. Investing cash flow in the first nine months of 2022 mainly includes the investments in new assets and the distributions received from entities under the equity method. Financing cash flow was $263 million, and it mainly includes the schedule, principal repayments of our project financing agreements for $196 million, and dividends paid to shareholders and non-controlling interest for $178 million. On the next slide, number eight, we would like to review our net debt position, which has decreased significantly compared to 2021 year end. Net project debt as of September 30th, 2022, was $3,946 million, a decrease of more than $500 million versus December 31, 2021. In addition, we closed the first nine months of 2022 with net corporate debt of $850 million. With this, our net corporate debt to CAFTI pre-corporate debt service ratio stood at three times, which puts Atlantica in a good position to finance our new investments. I will now turn the call back over to Santiago.
spk02: Thank you. Regarding growth, we are happy to announce close to $150 million in new investments. These include, among others, our first standalone battery storage system and an investment in a solar PV plant in operation on which we also plan to add storage. If we look at slide number 10, we will talk briefly about the new battery storage project which is going to start construction and is located inside our geothermal plant in California. The battery system is expected to have a capacity of around 100 MWh and to start operation in 2024. This project will benefit from the Inflation Reduction Act, which we believe is and will be a game changer for the sector. In fact, we expect this project to be the first one of a pipeline of projects in the Southwest. This is a region that presents a clear opportunity for storage and with our experience in most renewable energy technologies and in storage, we believe that Atlantica is in a very good position to take advantage of this sizable growth opportunity. On the next page, we review our first investment in PV plant with batteries. We have closed recently the acquisition in Chile of a 70 megawatt PV plant through our renewable energy platform there, and we expect to add a battery system next year. Let me turn back the call to Francisco, who will cover the last part of our presentation.
spk01: Thank you, Santiago. Let's move on to slide number 10. Since we're in a market environment with rise in interest rate and a strong U.S. dollar, we would like to spend a couple minutes reviewing how Atlantica's prudent financing and hedging policy limits our exposure. First, our CAFTI impact from the current Euro devaluation is limited. Atlantica has a natural hedge since the distributions from its assets in Europe are partially offset with Euro-denominated corporate interest and GNA. For the net Euro exposure, we have a hedging strategy through currency options by which, on a rolling basis, we hedge 100% of the expected net exposure for the next 12 months and 75% for the following 12 months. That being said, after month 24, the potential impact of CAFTI would be approximately 2% to 3%. This is calculated as the difference between the expected average net euro exposure converted at the current euro dollar rate and our average hedge rate for 2022. Second, Atlantic has protected against inflation thanks to escalation factors. Approximately 50% of the company's portfolio has revenue index either to U.S. inflation index or to an inflation-based formula or to a fixed number. Third, we are well insulated against interest rate risk. Ninety-four percent of the company's consolidated debt is either hedged or fixed, And an increase of 100 basis points in interest rates with respect to current rates will have an impact of approximately 1.5% of our CAFD. And finally, given the regulated nature of revenue from our assets in Europe, any potential cap on market prices should have no impact in the net value of our assets. In addition, our assets in Europe are not subject to new taxes recently announced. With this, I conclude today's presentation. Thank you for joining us, and now we will open the lines for questions. Operators, we're ready for Q&A.
spk03: Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad now. If you change your mind, please press star followed by two. When preparing to ask your question, please ensure your device is unmuted locally. Our first question comes from Angie Storensky. from Seaport. Your line is open.
spk04: Thank you. So first question, again, I was looking through your slides. So those battery investments that you are proposing, do you have PPAs for these investments? And if you could talk maybe about CAFTI yields you expect to derive from them.
spk02: Thank you, Angie. So regarding the new investments, we have announced each situation is different. There's a project in California, as you saw. There's another project which is in Chile. In both cases, these are geographies where storage as a technology makes a lot of sense. And therefore, in front of us, we have different options. In the case of the U.S., one option would be to go for a full PPA. Other options would involve having fixed payments RA through resource adequacy together with market revenues. And at this point in time, we are going to be working on the different options in front of us. But in any case, both business models result in returns, both long-term and short-term, which are more than enough to meet the objectives we have. As you can imagine, Angie, given current pricing and the short-term, mid-term outlook, these investments should result in very good multiples and yields.
spk04: Okay, but just again, back to the either EBITDA or CAF yields, I mean, How do these compare, or your expectations of returns, how do these compare to what you have been showing over the last couple of quarters? So is there an in those return expectations, as you said, in recognition of the higher financing environment?
spk02: So if you look at our disclosure, Angie, you will see that in terms of EV to EBITDA multiples, one of the projects we mentioned at 10 times, the other one we mentioned at six times. So it should be, and that's why I'm mentioning that from an accretion point of view, from a return point of view, the projects do clearly meet our requirements.
spk04: Okay, good. And then secondly, your slide on project financing shows that you could pull forward CAFD by basically refinancing that non-recourse debt. So you haven't announced anything. So is this like a lever that you leave yourself once there's no additional growth in the asset base? Or when could we actually expect an update on potential refinancing?
spk02: Sure. So this is clearly another lever that, as we have been discussing in the past, we believe is going to help us to increase our distributions are covered. In fact, once you go through our disclosure, you will see that we have refinanced an asset in this quarter.
spk04: Okay. And then lastly, I know that you usually make these comments on the fourth quarter call, but is there any update on your growth projections, so targeted increase in the CAF Deeper Share for the next couple of years, or maybe a comment on 2023 or 2024? What would be derived from the growth projects you have already locked in as far as CAF Deeper Share growth?
spk02: So, as you mentioned, Angie, we typically give guidance when we announce results for the year. So, there's not much I can add there. We will be talking about that in February when we announce results. Nothing new in that regard.
spk04: Okay. Thank you.
spk02: Thank you.
spk03: We now turn to Julian Dumoulin-Smith from Bank of America. Your line is open.
spk05: Hey, good morning, team. Thank you so much. If I may, to follow up on Angie's question there on the first one there, so you don't have an off-day commitment yet for California, if I hear it right. You don't have a CPC arrangement. And to the extent to which that you opt for the latter with the, you know, fixed RA payments, what kind of duration are you looking at getting? And then just to throw in another related question, the EBITDA multiple 10 times, that's exclusive of an ITC, I take it?
spk02: So, in terms of off-takers, as I mentioned before, in both geographies, you have the options of PPAs and you have the options of an RA or the equivalent of the RA, and that would mean that the assets would be contracted in any case. In one case, they could be nearly 100% contracted. In the other case, going through an RA, it would be a smaller percentage. And at this point in time, given the situation in the market, we want to keep our options open. And both options, as I mentioned before, we believe deliver very good economics. As you know, our portfolio at this point in time is nearly exclusively contracted. and therefore we believe that we have the option in these couple of new projects to look at both situations. In terms of your second question, the multiple is the EV, the investment divided by the EBITDA. So the gross investment if you want, Julian.
spk05: Yes, right. It's not net of the ITC. Excellent. Thank you. And then if I may just to pivot the subject here to the Loan Star 2, that's the wind project here. Can you talk about just repowering and opportunities to recontract that asset? I believe it's with EPR as it stands right now, and it's coming up on contract termination here. If you can speak about the options ahead here.
spk02: Yeah. So, as you rightly mentioned, we have a partner there. Therefore, everything we do there should be done with our partner. In the short term, our intention is to sell to the market. We think that short term, that's the best option available. Now, given IRA, we will continue analyzing options to go through a repowering at some point in time. And obviously, IRA opens new opportunities that we didn't have when we made the investment in terms of when and how to do such a repowering. But short term, we think that the best option is to sell in the market for some time.
spk05: Got it. But why not a repowering, if you can speak to thinking about that, given the IRA clarity that we've got now?
spk02: Yeah, to help you, I mean, to share with you some elements of the reasoning you need to follow there. The when in a repowering is extremely important, and you need to look there at inflation, cost of supplies, workforce, et cetera, et cetera. Plus, you need to compare that versus short-term prices in the market. So our intention as Atlantica would be to have that asset contracted at some point in time. But given IRA, we are in no rush, and our intention is to optimize the value of the asset, taking into account market prices, especially in the short term.
spk05: yeah that makes sense right elevated power price in the near term no reason to take the asset down for any kind of um repowering or maintenance or otherwise so i hear you all right i'll leave it there thank you guys very much thanks julian our next question comes from david kuzada from raymond james your line is open thanks uh morning everyone um my first question here just just on your um
spk06: your comments around the growth outlook in the U.S. and the potential benefits of the Inflation Reduction Act. I'm just curious if you can discuss your U.S. pipeline at all, maybe even just qualitatively, you know, what kind of projects do you have that could benefit from the legislation there? And even if possible, or maybe as kind of a side question, you know, what your thoughts are around interconnection delays and, you know, challenges getting into that market.
spk02: Sure. So we do think, obviously, that IRA is going to help the sector in general and Atlantica specifically as well. In our case, the storage project we are talking about today is the first of a pipeline we have been working on. for the last few years, so we do believe that we have a number of projects and you have a couple of figures in our disclosure regarding that pipeline in the Southwest. We believe that we are going to have opportunities in the next years to benefit from IRA and develop and build a number of assets, mostly around the storage and the PV as the portfolio is in the Southwest.
spk06: Okay, excellent. Thank you for that. And then maybe one on your dividend policy, just high level, and I appreciate that a lot of this is the board's discretion, but as you're looking at more development projects and growing and building new projects, I'm curious if you see a scenario where you might increase your proportion of retained cash in order to fund some of these projects in the future.
spk02: sure so as you rightly pointed out obviously the board is the one deciding the dividend at this point in time our policy is to be around an 80 percent payout ratio that's in our disclosure and that's the policy we have obviously what the board would do in the future I wouldn't like to comment and but that's the policy we have and we are following
spk06: Okay, understood. Thank you. And then maybe just one last one for me. And again, as it relates to your opportunities throughout the U.S., just any updated thoughts with respect to opportunities you could pursue with Algonquin?
spk02: So with Algonquin, as you know, in the past, we have done a few projects in South America, and periodically we analyze opportunities with them. So it's one of our sources of growth, and we intend to continue looking at opportunities with them. But again, being one of the many sources of growth.
spk06: Okay, excellent. Thank you. I will turn it over. Thank you, David.
spk03: We now turn to Mark Strauss from JPMorgan. Your line is open.
spk09: Yes, excuse me. Thank you very much for taking our questions. Just a clarifying question following up on the IRA. When you talk about most of your U.S. pipeline being in storage going forward, Is that because other technologies aren't clearing the required return hurdle, or is that just a relative comment that storage looks better than other type of assets?
spk02: No, I mean, it's not. Not trying to say that the other technologies do not meet the benchmarks at all. It's simply given the fact that the pipeline I'm talking about is in the southwest, California and neighboring states, we do see an opportunity around the storage. As you can imagine, as solar penetration of solar PV increases, you start to see opportunities for storage and probably California is one of the most advanced markets in that regard. That's why our specific portfolio as of today in the Southwest has more storage, but that's all. It's very specific to that region currently and for our portfolio. But obviously we look at opportunities in many other technologies and in many other locations.
spk09: Got it. Yeah, okay. And then just following up on slide 12 on the hedging, I just want to be clear here. So the strategy moving forward, even given the recent volatility in FX, is to continue to hedge 100% for the next 12 months and 75% for the following 12 months. So you're not trying to game FX, essentially, looking out to 2024 and 2025. as we roll into next year.
spk01: That is correct, Mark. I mean, we do our hygiene strategy I described with 100% of the next 12 months and the 75-month form, a month 12 to 24 on a rolling basis, and we continue to do that. So there's no change in our hygiene strategy. Okay. Good to hear. Thank you. Thank you.
spk03: As a reminder, to ask any further questions, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad now. Our next question comes from Mark Jarvie from CIBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.
spk07: Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Santiago, I wonder if you could break down the $150 million of new investments and just clarify how much of that will be deployed in 2022?
spk02: So that's not a detail we are sharing in our disclosure, so I wouldn't be able to give you numbers there. Obviously, some of the projects, as I said, are going to be online in 24, so that would mean that a significant part of those projects, the investment would happen more in 23 than in 22. Okay.
spk07: Can you comment at all in terms of where you think you might end up this year in terms of FD deployment, whether or not you'd hit the 300 million target?
spk02: Yeah, I mean, as you know, the 300 is sort of guidance. There are years where we do more and we do less. At this point in time, it's a bit early to tell you where we are going to land specifically. It should probably be south of 300. But at the same time, for 23, we already have a significant amount of money earmarked or being invested.
spk07: Okay. And then just to clarify one thing on these investments, it does seem like at least the one at COSO is unlevered. What about the investment in Chile? Does it have any debt attached to that, or is that unlevered at this point?
spk02: So at this point in time, they are unlevered. Our intention would be to lever them and probably to lever them once they are operational.
spk07: Got it. And this last question, just with that pipeline you have in the southwest, six projects, PV and storage, any rough indication of when you think the next project could come to fruition and be able to announce something? Is that something that could come together next year, or are these projects a couple years out? I'm reaching for a final investment decision.
spk02: Yeah. Yeah, it's a portfolio, and like all portfolios, there should be things coming in different dates. And therefore, you know, it will depend on how we can advance further. It will depend on the contracting side of things. And then there could be projects in the next few years being ready to decide whether we invest.
spk07: Understood. Okay, thank you.
spk02: Great, thanks.
spk03: Our next question comes from William Gripen from UBS. Your line is open.
spk08: Excellent, thank you. First one, just coming back to the battery projects. Do you have visibility or contracts on battery supply there already locked in or, as I said, at least visibility to securing supply?
spk02: So, obviously, the teams are working on that. I would not comment on the specifics there, but given the size of the projects, it should not be a problem. At this point in time, when you're talking about battery supply, you are able to lock in reasonable agreements, especially if you have been working with the suppliers for a long time and you are working on sizes like the ones we are discussing.
spk08: Got it. And then specifically on the COSO project, you're calling that one a standalone storage project, but obviously, you know, locating it on the COSO side. Could you just speak to the benefits of doing that? Is it primarily just leveraging the existing interconnection and land? Or are there other benefits you see potentially in doing that?
spk02: So those two are clearly important. And the third one is the operation and maintenance of the asset. Obviously, it will be done with the same crew that is today taking care of a geothermal plant. That's a significant synergy in terms of costs for us.
spk08: Got it. Appreciate the time. Thank you. Thank you.
spk03: This concludes our Q&A. I'll now hand over to Santiago Siege, CEO, for final remarks.
spk02: Great. Thank you very much to everybody for attending our call today. Thanks. Thank you.
Disclaimer