Azenta, Inc.

Greetings and welcome to the Azenta Q1 2024 Financial Results. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards, we will conduct a question and answer session. At that time, if you have a question, please press the 1 followed by the 4 on your telephone. If at any time during the conference you need to reach an operator, please press star 0. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded Wednesday, February 7, 2024. I will now turn the conference over to Sarah Silverman, Head of Investor Relations.

Thank you, Operator, and good afternoon to everyone on the line today. We would like to welcome you to our earnings conference call for the first quarter of fiscal year 2024. Our first quarter earnings press release was issued after the close of the market today and is available on our Investor Relations website located at investors.azenta.com. in addition to the supplementary PowerPoint slides that will be used during the prepared remarks today. I would like to remind everyone that during the course of the call, we will be making a number of forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Litigation Securities Act of 1995. There are many factors that may cause actual financial results or other events to differ from those identified in such forward-looking statements. I would refer you to the section of our earnings release titled Safe Harbor Statement, the Safe Harbor slide on the aforementioned PowerPoint presentation on our website, and our various filings with the SEC, including our annual reports on Form 10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. We make no obligation to update these statements should future financial data or events occur that differ from the forward-looking statements presented today. We may refer to a number of non-GAAP financial measures which are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. We believe the non-GAAP measures provide an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations and performance, but when considered with GAAP financial results and the reconciliation of GAAP measures, they provide an even more complete understanding of the events of business. Non-GAAP measures should not be relied upon to the exclusion of the GAAP measures themselves. On the call with me today is our President and Chief Executive Officer, Steve Schwartz, and our Chief Financial Officer, Herman Cuto. We will open the call with remarks from Steve on highlights of the first quarter. Then Herman will provide a more detailed look into our financial results and our outlook for fiscal year 2024. We will then take your questions at the end of the prepared remarks. With that, I would like to turn the call over to our CEO, Steve Schwartz.

Thank you, Sarah. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I'll focus my remarks on a summary of Q1 2024 results, our outlook for the full year, including updates on some of our key initiatives, as well as our view on the current market environment. Let me begin by saying that we're pleased with our Q1 results, as we delivered everything we'd intended for the quarter in terms of performance and progress on key initiatives for the year. We have momentum that supports the guidance we announced at our November earnings call. In addition, new product and services offerings are gaining market momentum and we're running larger contracts of bundle offerings for larger customers. We're in a post-COVID world now that colors the life sciences industry in more muted tones. This environment allows us to more clearly see the value of our capability in reference to peers in our space. We've embedded ourselves in a critical position in the center of a biological sample-based world that begins at discovery and goes all the way to the delivery of treatments. Our ability to source, manage, and store, and measure and interrogate samples, ultimately providing discovery-unlocking data, is paramount to all that is advancing this industry. We serve this sample world with a unique set of capabilities. We've built a company that's headed towards $700 million in revenue this year by matching our capabilities to customers' needs for more automated sample workflows and world-class multi-omics capabilities. And we further benefit from tailwinds generated by an industry trend to outsource more critical sample management and measurement. We see sustained long-term growth above the market rate that can persist for years to come. In addition, we've identified the potential for another strong growth vector that will utilize our core capabilities to allow us to add some of the rarest and most valuable biosamples into the discovery pipeline. Samples that are sourced by us, managed by us, measured by us, and owned by us, By this, we mean the chance to bring consented samples from Africa, Asia, and South America, which will enrich and diversify the genomic sample population, which today is still dramatically underrepresented in research and discovery. There's still much work to be done to make this a reality, but we're uniquely positioned to deliver on this tremendous opportunity. We're a great company in strong market-leading positions, serving a market in need of all that we do. I'll now turn to some highlights from the quarter. In Q1, we delivered revenue of $154 million, which translates to an organic decline of 15% year-over-year, but up 2% when you exclude the B medical segment, which had a lighter Q1 due to the timing of orders, as expected, and up 5% when you also exclude our consumables and instruments business, which has faced the most notable headwinds in the post-COVID timeframe. Let's look at the business by segment. I'll begin with SMS and multi-omic segments before I turn to B medical. these market segments that were down for most peers in our space we continued to grow we expanded in and around the sample space and once again received some indications that even the areas of our business that have been slow to recover like consumables and instruments are showing signs of continued recovery specifically our sample management solutions business grew one percent year over year on an organic basis and grew nine percent excluding the cni business inside this it's the growth of the sample volumes that continues to be the fuel for our SMS opportunities. Large automated stores revenue was up 37% year-over-year, and sample repository solutions was up a healthy 6% year-over-year, continuing the trends we saw in the September quarter. This pattern of business is fueled by two key drivers. One, the sheer number of samples that are collected for future discovery, and two, the trend toward outsourcing the care and management of these large, precious, and complex sample collections. We're positioned perfectly to provide on-site automated systems as well as off-site collection management. And our workflow solution of best-in-class automated stores and repository services makes us enter the ideal choice for customers, regardless of their sample management strategy. To add even more potential to our SMS opportunity, this week we launched a breakthrough large automated storage system, the BioARC Ultra, which we featured at the Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening 2024 International Conference in Boston. This new system designed to hold up to 10 million samples offers unparalleled storage density. The Ultra features an innovative eco-friendly cooling system that utilizes natural air rather than ozone depleting refrigerants, furthering our commitment towards sustainability as an organization, as well as supporting our customers in their carbon footprint reduction efforts. Not only will this provide a new level of sample management performance to our largest customers, but will also be transformative in the efficiency of our biorepository operations. In sample repository solutions, during the quarter we closed another multi-million dollar, multi-year large sample management agreement to provide sample storage and related services for our research consortium that currently has samples distributed across more than 25 sites. Similar to the large disease specific projects we highlighted in recent quarters, We'll provide consolidated management of this precious collection and centralized laboratory services to members of this research collaborative. This project will start with the transfer of the customer's existing sample collection with the anticipation that this collection is expected to grow rapidly over the next five years. Finally, we're also encouraged that consumables and instruments showed sequential growth for the second quarter in a row. Our channel partners continue to see improvement and end user demand is also showing signs of life with increased inquiries year over year. In a very challenging market for life science services, we're pleased that MultiOMICS delivered organic growth of 2% with yet another record revenue quarter in our next generation sequencing business. This result is particularly noteworthy as it highlights our ability to navigate through a market that's once again being disrupted by a quantum improvement in cost performance. As everyone's aware, to the benefit of all discovery, the cost of sequencing is falling rapidly. We see this as not just good for global health initiatives, but also as a driver for significant demand for our sequencing services. Necessarily, lower sequencing costs allow us to offer lower prices, and the elasticity of demand is driving more volume and lab efficiency. As we manage this balance of volume, cost, and profitability, we believe we're dialing it in just about right as revenue continues to increase while our gross margin is, for now, stable. So although a 2% increase is modest growth, we believe it represents strong outperformance as end markets remain muted. In general, pharma and academic funding remain steady to up modestly, but biotech continues to face funding constraints. From a regional perspective, Europe was up strongly, growing approximately 20%, and the business was broad-based. The expected opening of our new NGS lab in Oxford, UK in late spring is already helping us gain traction in several key accounts. Although our North American multi-omics business remains soft, declining in the low single digits, our China team delivered yet another strong quarter of growth in the low teens. Our team in China is incredibly strong, and they continue to outpace competitors there while they overcome some of the macroeconomic and regulatory headwinds that exist in that market. C-Medical delivered $13 million of revenue, down 70% as expected. The lower level of revenue year over year is primarily due to the timing of orders. As of today, we have $19 million in orders on hand for Q2, and this number contains no revenue from the DRC. We recognize that we have much more product to ship this year, but we maintain our expectations for mid-single digit growth for B Medical for the full year fiscal 2024. But I do want to take this moment to give an update on our activities with the Democratic Republic of Congo and the opportunity we announced on our last earnings call. We're pleased with the vaccine cold chain business that's expected from this project, but even more by the fact that we have an opportunity to play a central role in the collection of millions of samples of whole blood in support of crucial health initiatives that are high priorities for the Minister of Health. We'll continue to keep you updated on this exciting opportunity as it develops. To summarize Q1 results, our sample-based business remains a steady source of growth. Our customer positions across geographies and applications, coupled with improving markets, will only add to our above market momentum. Our investments to lead the industry in energy-efficient, ultra-cold sample storage, as well as our important role coordinating focused health initiatives, gives us tremendous confidence in the sustained growth prospects in a life sciences market in need of these new solutions. Yet, as we benefit from this position, we're also keenly focused on enhancing our profitability through disciplined cost management, plus a series of transformative structural improvements that Herman is leading with a huge amount of energy and enthusiastic support from our team. A fulsome description of these focus areas and what we plan to deliver from these initiatives, as well as our long-term outlook, including our plans for Be Medical, which better aligns with Azenta, will be key features of our presentation at our investor day next month. We very much look forward to the chance to engage with you in more depth on March 14th. And now it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Herman.

Thank you, Steve. My first 100 days at Azenta have been both busy and fulfilling. I have had the opportunity to meet with many of our employees and have visited several key sites with more visits planned over the coming months. I continue to be impressed by what I see and the opportunity that lies ahead. To supplement my remarks today, I refer back to the slide deck available on our website. Turning to slide three for some highlights. First quarter revenue was $154 million, down 13% year over year and down 15% on an organic basis. As expected, the lower B medical revenue drove the Q1 decline. Excluding B medical, the business grew 2% organically. As we have discussed in the past, the consumables and instruments business, or CNI, remained a headwind to growth in the quarter on a year-over-year basis. If you exclude CNI as well as B medical, organic growth was 5%. This above-market growth rate is consistent with what we delivered in Q4 fiscal year 23. In CNI, we did see another 5% sequential improvement as we moved from Q4 to Q1, and we believe that we have now cycled through the tough year-over-year compares. We delivered non-GAAP EPS of 2 cents and adjusted EBITDA of 3% in Q1. Our cost reduction initiatives continue to track well relative to our plans. We ended the quarter in a very strong position with $1.1 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. Free cash flow was positive for the third quarter in a row at $15 million as we continue to focus on commercial, operational, and working capital management. In addition to the positive operational performance in Q1, we returned $113 million of capital to our shareholders through the repurchase of 2.3 million shares of Azenta stock. We have now completed roughly $1 billion of the $1.5 billion of planned share repurchases. We continue to be extremely well positioned from a balance sheet perspective, and even after this investment, we will still have roughly $500 million of cash on hand to be used for disciplined and long-term value creating initiatives. Now let's turn to slide four to take a deeper look at our results in the quarter. Total revenue was 154 million. As anticipated, non-GAAP gross margin was down year over year, coming in at 43.5%, down 190 basis points. Excluding B medical, gross margin was roughly flat. Non-GAAP operating margin was negative 5.6%, down 560 basis points year over year. Excluding B-Medical, we saw operating margin expand 160 basis points. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 3%, down 370 basis points year over year, again driven by the B-Medical dynamics. This was partially offset by strong leverage from the combination of better expense management and the impact of the cost reduction actions implemented in fiscal 2023. Again, non-GAAP earnings was two cents per share in the quarter. Before I get into the segment details, I want to remind everyone that Q1 is the first quarter we will be reporting in the new segment structure. You should have seen an 8K posted last week, which provides two years of historical quarterly information in the new format. With that, let's turn to slide five for a review of our segment results, starting with sample management solutions, or SMS. Total SMS segment revenue was 79 million for the quarter, up 5% year-over-year on a reported basis, led by growth in sample repository solutions, which was up 7%. SMS organic growth was 1%. If we look at SMS excluding CNI, organic growth for the segment was 9%. As Steve mentioned, continued momentum in sample repository solutions and large automated stores were the key contributors to the year-over-year growth. Zyeth contributed approximately $1 million in revenue. SMS first quarter gross margin was 43.1% and was up 10 basis points year-over-year, absorbing the impact of strategic investments such as the new Boston repository. Turning next to the multiomics segment. Multiomics delivered revenue of 63 million in the first quarter, an increase of 3% year over year. The organic revenue for the quarter was up 2%, led by double-digit growth in gene synthesis, modest growth in next-gen sequencing, and a decline in Sanger. Of note, our multiomics business in China delivered another strong quarter with organic growth of 12%. The multiomics business gross margin was 47.1%, down 30 basis points year over year. As the cost of sequencing has come down with technological advances, the increased volume in conjunction with labor productivity and direct material savings has allowed us to maintain a fairly stable gross margin. And finally, the B medical segment. Revenue was 13 million in the quarter, down roughly 70% on a reported and organic basis. The lower level of revenue was primarily due to timing of vaccine cold chain orders. Gross margin of 28.1% was lower than last year, primarily driven by sales mix. Next, let's turn to slide six for a review of the balance sheet. As I mentioned earlier, we ended the quarter with 1.1 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. We had no debt outstanding. During the quarter, improvements in working capital translated to the strong operating cash flow that you could see on the next slide. Cash flow from operations was $26 million, primarily driven by an improvement in inventory, accounts receivable, and customer prepayments. Capital expenditures for the quarter were $12 million, slightly elevated versus recent quarters, primarily due to investments in multi-omics equipment. In total, this brought free cash flow in the quarter to $15 million. Turning to guidance on slide 8, as you saw in our press release, we are maintaining our previous full-year guide that we initiated on our Q4 fiscal 2023 call in November, which calls for organic growth of 5% to 8%. approximately 300 basis points of adjusted EBITDA margin expansion and non-GAAP EPS in a range of $0.19 to $0.29 for fiscal year 2024. In terms of the quarterly guidance, please refer to page 9 of the slide deck for color and key considerations. In Q2, we expect revenue growth to accelerate to mid to high single digits. Multiomics and sample management solutions are expected to grow mid-single digits on a combined basis, and at this point in the quarter, B Medical is expected to grow 25%. We expect gross margin to be approaching the mid-40s and slightly better than Q1 fiscal year 24. R&D expense as a percentage of revenue will be consistent with Q1 fiscal year 24, SG&A is expected to be slightly better than Q1 fiscal year 24 on a percentage of revenue basis. Overall, we expect the business to deliver an adjusted EBITDA margin that approaches mid-single digits and non-GAAP EPS roughly flat to Q1 fiscal year 24. In closing, we are pleased with our performance in Q1 and look forward to our analyst day scheduled for March 14th of this year where we will discuss our longer-term strategy, vision, and financial goals. We are committed to delivering on our purpose, serving our customers, and enabling life sciences breakthroughs faster. This concludes our prepared remarks, and I will now turn the call over to the operator for questions.

Thank you. If you would like to register a question, please press the one followed by the four on your telephone. You will hear a three-tone prompt to acknowledge that request. If your question has been answered and you would like to withdraw your registration, please press the 1 followed by the 3. Once again, to register for a question, it is 1-4 on your telephone keypad. And your first question comes from the line of David Saxon with Needham. Your line is open.

Great. Hi, Steve. Hi, Herman. Thanks so much for answering my question. I guess I wanted to start on the medical. So, I mean, obviously the December quarter is supposed to be the strongest quarter. But it looks like the second half of the quarter only drove, you know, three, four million in revenue. So is the seasonality changing at all? Or is there anything about the deals in the pipeline that's kind of resulting in that dynamic not holding or just requiring a longer selling cycle? And then just regarding the DRC deal, it doesn't sound like there's anything in the fiscal second quarter guide. But can you give us a sense of how we should think about the cadence of that deals revenue being realized in the back half?

David, it's Herman. How are you? I guess I would start with bringing everybody back to some of the commentary that we talked about on the fourth quarter call that be medical. It's a pipeline business. Trying to predict the timing of these things is very hard to do. What I would say is we have a very robust pipeline, but the timing of the conversion of that pipeline is one of the unknowns here. In terms of maybe just a little bit of backdrop on the funding environment, there's a baseline of GAVI funding out there. That just hasn't happened yet. So in terms of seasonality and things like that, it's not that. It's just when that funding frees up, the orders will start to flow. As I said, we have a robust pipeline. We feel good about where the pipeline is. The pipeline gives us confidence in the full year guide. We just have to be comfortable with the timing of when it comes in.

Yeah, and David, this is Steve. On the DRC, there are ongoing really active discussions about how to get the segments of the contract let and contributed. There's a lot of urgency from the DRC standpoint to get the vaccine cold chain products in place, but as we mentioned, there are also emergency vehicles and distribution vehicles that are being discussed, and what we can tell you is the multi-party discussions are going on, make sure the funding comes in. But we're confident about the contract, the timing is what we're working on. So we'll let you know when we've got it in hand. I think, as you can imagine, that's the way we've been guiding here, is what do we hold at the time of the call, just to make sure the expectation is set properly. But I can assure you there's a lot of activity going on to make sure that, by all parties, to make sure that gets accelerated here as we go forward.

Okay, great. That's helpful. Thanks for that. And then just as my follow-up, I wanted to ask on CNI and the recovery you're seeing there. I think you had kind of called out the U.S. as being ahead of Europe from a recovery perspective. So any color on the geographic mix of CNI as Europe kind of recovers behind the U.S.? How big of a tailwind could that be? And then I think, Steve, it was you in your prepared remarks. You called out C&I, you know, fully lapping the tougher comps, or maybe that was Herman. So should we think about C&I being a, you know, year-on-year grower going forward? Thanks so much for taking my questions.

Yeah, David, it's Herman. The commentary around C&I is very similar to what we talked about on the fourth quarter call. So the U.S., when we talked to the team, it does seem that distributors are now at pre-pandemic inventory levels. So whatever we're selling into the distributors, it's being sold through to the end market. So that we feel very confident about, and it's a similar situation as we talked about on the Q4 call. Europe, it's very similar. They were lagging behind a little bit. The commentary is still the same. But again, we expect to be out of that when we get into the second half of this year. We did see sequential growth from Q4 to Q1. So that was about 5%. So we have two quarters in a row. So from Q3 to Q4, it was 9% growth. And now we're seeing an additional five. So at this point in time, we do think we've cycled through it. And as we get into the second quarter and later in the year, we don't expect it to be a headwind. As we said in the past, we're not counting on a ton of growth in this area. But we do believe we're out of the tough compares.

Okay, great. Thank you so much. Your next question comes from the line of Jacob Johnson with Stevens.

Your line is open.

Hey, thanks. Good afternoon, everybody. Hey, Steve. Hey, Herman. I guess I, too, will start on the medical. Steve, I just want to follow up on your comments about the DRC contract. You said you're confident in the contract, but then you mentioned kind of vehicle procurement and timing can be difficult. I just want to make sure, I guess, one, you know, is there any risk to the full year guide from this? Or is this just more about kind of when it hits, you know, two Q versus three Q, four Q. And then I guess along those same lines, obviously the seasonality has been a bit different than we would have expected this year. And I know it can be a lumpy business. I just, I'm curious kind of on an annual basis, do you think this is a more predictable or stable business or, Is there any risk this could be a lumpy business from year to year? I know it's too early to talk about 2025, but I think that... Yeah, so Jacob, let me answer him backwards.

This is Steve. So thanks for the question. On an annual basis, I think it's not so lumpy. If we always run the business and we look at trailing 12 months, it's not linear for sure, but the lumpiness gets smoothed out. We expected... based on three data points from diligence, if you will, that the December quarter would be the largest one. And, you know, we came to this December quarter and it was not, but we've seen that in our forecast. On the DRC, we just, we continue to be bullish about, you know, how many units, where they're going to go. It's just a matter of these things getting lit. There's a pent-up demand for vaccines that need to be distributed, so we're confident that they will, you know, that they'll begin to be part of this year. We don't know the timing exactly, but I can tell you there's a lot of energy going into making sure that everything gets resolved so that we can start to ship product to the DRC.

And your next question comes from the line of Andrew Cooper with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hey, everyone. Thanks for the questions. I'll start with something other than be medical. So maybe just first in multiomics, I think you pointed out, you know, growing at a time when that's not necessarily what we're hearing from some of the others in the space. So just maybe any sense for whether that's something changing the competitive landscape. Are you taking share? Are you working with, you know, a little bit different sort of customer set than maybe some of the others are? Just help us think about what's allowing you to grow when others are struggling a little bit more.

Yeah, Andrew, thanks. When we look at it, for sure I can tell you that contracts that we have, the customers that we have, are giving us more business. But I can't tell you it's because we've taken share from others. But as we get more capable, for sure the size of the contract work we're doing for customers has grown for a lot of the larger customers. We attribute it to that because, indeed, in North America, a lot of the biotech funding has been off or down as companies have either reduced funding or gone out of business. So from larger customers, without question, we're getting more business. And I do attribute the elasticity on some of the NGS. The number of reactions we do has gone up appreciably, and the revenue has grown. So I attribute it to both of those things. I will say, for example, on the Sanger side, that shrunk a little bit here in the last quarter. Two reasons. One, Without question, this a little bit softer North America business has caused us some issues there, and we begin to transfer some of the plasmid EZ sequencing into the NGS business. But I think just aggressive sales, close customer contact, and larger contracts with larger customers are what's allowed us to continue to sustain the business here.

Okay, great. And then...

Oh, go ahead.

Yeah, Andrew, I was just going to add, you know, in terms of the funding environment, I think, you know, from a macro perspective, we're seeing steady funding in pharma and academics. It's when you get into biotech where you're still seeing a little bit of the funding pressure. So we'll just continue to watch that. When we do our scouting in the markets, we understand that if the interest rate environment gets a little better, maybe some of that funding will come along.

Great, that's helpful. And then maybe just on margins in that segment, I mean, you mentioned a lot of the things that help you maintain as best you can the margins there, but sounds like certainly still some pricing pressures. So just maybe what's baked into the guide in terms of pricing and maybe longer term, you know, where do you think we can settle out? Or is it a continued kind of ongoing pressure at this pace, at a different pace? Just would love your thoughts on what that looks like.

Yeah, it's Herman, Andrew. So it's an interesting dynamic with pricing right now in the multiomics business because what you have on the revenue line is you have the pricing pressure, but you now have a lot more volume than you've ever had before because now sequencing is much more affordable than it was in the past. So you have that dynamic going on on the top line. And when you look at margins, you have a couple of things going on. So first, you have a ton of leverage on your fixed overhead. So that drives cost savings. And then on top of that, you have labor efficiency because the technology is there, and also the direct material efficiency. So you're kind of seeing a nice, stable gross margin. When we think about pricing, in the guide, we cared for it. We knew it was going to be there. So it's all contemplated in the guide. But we think it's going to be a dynamic as the market sort of cycles through the technology. We will start to see it settle down when we get into the back half of the year.

Okay, great. And then maybe if I can just sneak one last one in.

Just on CNI, you know, any sense for – I know you called out some of the sequential improvements here, both last quarter and this quarter, but – you know, what is the typical seasonal step-up you might have seen into a calendar 4Q where we often do see some of those changes? And then, you know, aligned with that, is there anything in particular, whether it's, you know, more anecdotal or not, that you can point to to give you that comfort that, hey, we're past the worst of it other than simply the plus 5% sequentially?

Yeah, I mean, maybe I'll step back and talk about it from and a Zenta point of view. If you look at the Zenta business and you exclude B Medical for the dynamics that we talked about, and you have Q1, you have the Q2 guide, and you have the bookend of the four-year guide, what you'll see, and it's just math, is that it's a very balanced business overall. You know, if you look at the mix of revenue in the first half versus the mix of revenue in the second half, it's very balanced. And if you look at the growth rates from the first half to the second half, it's very balanced. So I think you have similar dynamics in CNI. Andrew, I wouldn't look at that business as being overly cyclical. And Azenta overall, when you unpack the SMS business and also the multi-omics business, you see really a nice balance across the first half and second half.

Great.

Looking forward to seeing everybody in March. Appreciate it.

Your next question comes from the line of Paul Knight with KeyBunk.

Your line is open. Yes.

Where are you with the transition on your sales distribution model? I know you had to redo that strategy. So are you half done? Where are you with, you know, where you think you're going to be?

Yeah, hi, Paul. Thanks. We're aligned. So we have the sales organization is complete. In each of the three segments, there's a dedicated sales organization. And now it's just getting traction and practice and making sure that we execute. But we believe the fact that we've been growing in this environment is because we've got the sales aligned again as it should be. So distribution channel continues to build. And you can imagine as we exercise that channel, we'll be you know, rotating through different distributors who are keeping up, but we like how the channel has built, and the scientists selling to scientists in the multi-omics business is already completely aligned. We still have, you know, some openings to fill, but by and large, that organization is also in place, and that's why we're seeing, we're starting to see really good traction.

And then could you update us on... on China. I know that you redid logistics a little bit there last year.

You bet. And so let me talk to China a little bit. So we mentioned that we were, you know, double digits growth in China again for the third consecutive quarter. Most of the business we do in China these days is services related. So it's for the multi-omics business. And we grew 11 percent in synthesis this quarter again. So we've seen strong growth in synthesis, really good recovery. The issues we had in China 18 months ago are behind us, and we feel like we're in a really good position. Back to growth, I can tell you the team is incredibly busy in China, serving the customers both inside and outside of China. So we believe China is fully capable, full speed ahead, and just the growth characteristics they've exhibited, so different from what's going on in the rest of the market. is a tribute to a strong team aggressively going after all their local customer base.

And then lastly, on Be Medical, I mean, I thought the real reason to buy Be Medical was to move it into things besides vaccine. The technology in the box was kind of what you liked a lot and made me move into other areas like service. Where are you in that journey with Be Medical?

Yeah, Paul, it's exactly what the DRC contract is about. That's probably the most exciting opportunity for us. We talked about the 60 million euro portion of the 100 million euro agreement is related to vaccine cold chain. But the DRC, Toyota, Zenta B Medical, we're all focused on how to use those now to do whole blood recovery. So the plans are for how do we get to retrieving a million whole blood samples per year in the DRC through this channel using the B medical vaccine boxes on outbound side, sample retrieval on the inbound. And those are the active live discussions that are going on right now because it is a top priority for the Ministry of Health. And that's exactly where we are. And that's why we're really enthusiastic about the DRC. We hope before the year is over, that we can articulate what that program is specifically with numbers and units and samples in terms of what that's done from a transformative standpoint to add tremendous value to a product-based B-medical vaccine cold chain to a services revenue for Azenta on the sample retrieval side. Thank you.

Your next question comes from line of Vijay Kumar with Evercore ISI. Your line is open.

Hey, Vijay. Hi, Steve. Hi, Steve. Thanks for taking my question. Just maybe keeping questions on guidance. Second quarter, mid-singles to high singles, is that like total revenue growth or is that an organic number, if you could clarify?

That's going to be an organic number.

Fantastic. And I think based on those numbers, the implied for back half is high teens. The step up in a back half, what are you assuming? Is that all just coming from B medical, the DRC contract, revenue recognition, or are you assuming sample management and multi-units to step up in back half? No.

So, Vijay, it's Herman. So, when you... So when you look at the business XB Medical for a minute, if you look at the Q1 actuals and you now have the color on Q2 and you have the full year guide as the bookend, what you'll see is a very balanced mix of revenue between the first half and the second half. And you can do the math. It's around $49.51. And you look at the growth rates, again, they're very, very balanced. So when you look at SMS and multi-omics, between the first half and second half, you don't have very large step-ups. It's not a hockey stick. The big piece is B Medical in the back half. And that becomes all about the pipeline conversion. We have a very robust pipeline. The timing of when it converts is the thing that we've been talking about for the last two quarters.

So, BJ, Steve, I think you hit it exactly. We have good line of sight, good visibility to the business on the multi-omic side, on the SMS side. We feel really comfortable about what that looks like. And as Herman defined the progress, it's modest uptick from the first half to the second half, and we feel good about that. And we had a lot of good opportunity there. it's heavily weighted on bringing the B medical business home in the second half.

Understood. And then one on NGS, here's the modest growth. Is that just because of the transition, because of price coming down? Can this business get back to high singles? How do you see NGS market laying out?

So, Vijay, what we see, again, we need a few more data points. But the number of reactions we ran was up considerably, but we prepared for it. We knew this was coming. But we're starting to populate with a large number now of the NovaSeq X pluses, and it does change the economics. So we're comfortable to help pass the reagent costs through to customers, but we still get paid for the value that we bring, for the consultative nature of what we do, for the capital that we've employed. And so that's why we can sustain the margin while we're growing revenue. The amount of work we're doing is up significantly. We're going to work to stay in front of it, so I'm guessing that we'll ask each other this question one quarter now, two quarters now, three quarters from now, just to make sure that we're keeping up. But right now, that's how this is playing out. We're able to sustain margin right now, but we're putting a lot of volume through brand new tools, and we think that transition will just keep coming.

Understood. And maybe my last one, Herman, for you. The interest income assumption here for QQ is that you have to make a lower cash balance on share repurchase. And then the free cash flow performance in Q1, pretty impressive. Is that sustainable? I think it's annualizing to $60 million.

Yeah. So... Maybe the first one on the interest income. Yeah, so we do see a little bit of uptick in interest income in the second quarter, and we're calling that out. And again, it's more around the timing of the cash that we're holding. And then free cash flow, yeah, we feel good about where cash flow is coming in. We're doing a lot of work operationally, a lot of discipline around spend management, timing, working capital. So I don't want to speculate on where the number could go, but your math is right. 15 times 4 is 60. So yeah, we'll see where it ends up.

Fantastic. Thanks, guys. Thanks, Vijay.

And your next question comes from the line of Yuan Shi with B Reilly. Your line is open.

Thank you for taking our questions. First, we are trying to better understand the impact from recent news from nanoscreen and invitee bankruptcy. Are they clients of the firm, and is there any read-through to your genomics customers in this clinical application space?

Yeah, Yuan, not yet. I mean, this isn't so immediate, and, you know, we've got other backup capabilities we provide to customers. So, you know, we... We think there's no repercussions that we haven't guided or people aren't aware of.

Got it. Another question is for AstraZeneca, AZ just announced a $300 million cell therapy project here in Maryland for cell therapy manufacturing. Can you maybe comment on for projects like this, what is the impact to different parts of the business you know, the large store, the sample management, and maybe some genomics, and if you can, you know, win some business here.

Yeah, Yuan, it's not something we're able to comment on specifically for a customer, but you can imagine anywhere there's an opportunity like this that we're involved. So we can't be specific, but we've been partners with AstraZeneca for many, many years.

Got it. That's all from my end. Thank you. Thanks, Johan.

And there are no further questions. I'll turn the call back to your presenters for closing remarks. Thank you very much.

Okay. Thank you, everybody, for joining the call today, and a big thank you to the 3,500-plus Zenta associates around the world. Thank you very much.

We look forward to speaking with you at the analyst day on the 14th of March. Thanks, everyone.

That does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you very much for your participation. You may now disconnect.