4/21/2022

speaker
Irene
Conference Call Coordinator

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining and being present at the Banner Corporation's first quarter 2022 conference call and webcast. My name is Irene and I will be coordinating today's call. If you would like to ask a question during the presentation, you may do so by pressing star one on your telephone keypad. In case you have joined us online, you have the possibility to press the flag icon on your web browser and to ask a question. I will now hand you over to your host. Mark Grescovich, President and CEO to begin. Mark, please go ahead.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Thank you, Irene, and good morning, everyone. I would also like to welcome you to the first quarter 2022 earnings call for Banner Corporation. As is customary, joining me on the call today is Peter Connor, our Chief Financial Officer, Joe Rice, our Chief Credit Officer, and Rich Arnold, our Head of Investor Relations. Rich, would you please read our forward-looking safe harbor statement?

speaker
Rich Arnold
Head of Investor Relations

Sure, Mark. Our presentation today discusses Banner's business outlook and will include forward-looking statements. Those statements include descriptions of management's plans, objectives, or goals for future operations, products or services, forecasts of financial or other performance measures, and statements about Banner's general outlook for economic and other conditions. We also may make other forward-looking statements in the question and answer period following management's discussion. Additionally, we provided an investor presentation that can be found in the investor relations section of our website, bannerbank.com. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from those discussed today. Information on the risk factors that could cause actual results to differ are available from the earnings press release that was released yesterday and a recently filed Form 10-K for the year ended December 31st, 2021. Forward-looking statements are effective only as of the date they are made and Banner assumes no obligation to update information concerning its expectations.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Back to you, Mark. Our clients, our communities, and our shareholders. Third, Joe Rice will provide comments on the current status of our loan portfolio. And finally, Peter Connor will provide more detail on our operating performance for the quarter and an update on our strategic initiative we are calling Banner Forward. As a reminder, the focus of Banner Forward is to accelerate growth in commercial banking, deepen relationships with retail clients, advanced technology strategies, and streamline our back office. I want to begin by thanking all of my 2000 colleagues in our company that have helped develop Banner forward and are working extremely hard to assist our clients and communities. Banner has lived our core values summed up as doing the right thing for 131 years. It is critically important that we continue to do the right thing for our clients, our communities, our colleagues, our company, and our shareholders to provide a consistent and reliable source of commerce and capital through all economic cycles and change events. I am pleased to report that is exactly what we continue to do. I am very proud of the entire Banner team that are living our core values. Now let me turn to an overview of our performance. As announced, Banner Corporation reported a net profit available to common shareholders of $44 million or $1.27 per diluted share for the quarter ended March 31st, 2022. This compared to a net profit common shareholders of $1.33 per share for the first quarter of 2021 and $1.44 per share for the fourth quarter of 2021. The earnings comparison is impacted by the allowance for credit losses recaptured, a continued inflow of liquidity coupled with very low interest rates, our strategy to maintain a moderate risk profile, continued good mortgage banking revenue, and the acceleration of deferred loan fee income associated with the SBA loan forgiveness of paycheck protection loans. Peter will discuss these items in more detail shortly. Directing your attention to pre-tax, pre-provision earnings and excluding the impact of merger and acquisition expenses, COVID expenses, gains and losses on the sale of securities, banner forward expenses, and changes in fair value of financial instruments, earnings were $49.7 million for the first quarter of 2022, in line with the first quarter of 2021 at $49.5 million. This measure I believe is helpful for illustrating the core earnings power of Banner. Banner's first quarter 2022 revenue from core operations decreased 3% to $137.6 million compared to $141.4 million for the first quarter of 2021, primarily due to the increase in mortgage banking revenues, which were down $6.9 million when compared to the same period last year. We continue to benefit from a larger earning asset mix, a good net interest margin, solid mortgage banking fee revenue, and good core expense control. Overall, this resulted in a return on average assets of 1.06% for the first quarter of 2022. Once again, our core performance reflects continued execution on our super community bank strategy, that is, growing new client relationships, adding to our core funding position by growing core deposits, and promoting client loyalty and advocacy through our responsive service model. To that point, our core deposits increased 9% compared to March 31st, 2021, and represent 94% of total deposits. Further, we continued our strong organic generation of new relationships and our loans outside of PPP loans increased 5% over the same period last year. Reflective of this solid performance, coupled with our strong tangible common equity ratio, we announced a core dividend in the quarter of 44 cents per share. Our branches continue to be fully operational and given the recent release of mass mandates in our region, we have reinstated our return to the workplace policies. To provide support for our clients through this crisis, we made available several assistance programs. Banner has provided SBA payroll protection funds totaling more than $1.6 billion for approximately 13,000 clients. Also, we made an important $1.5 million commitment to support minority-owned businesses in our footprint, a $1 million equity investment in Citi First Bank, the largest black-led depository financial institution in the United States, significant contributions to local and regional nonprofits, and have provided financial support for emergency and basic needs in our footprint. Finally, we continue to receive marketplace recognition and validation of our business model and our value proposition. J.D. Power & Associates announced this quarter that they've again ranked Banner the number one bank in the Northwest for client satisfaction for the sixth time. Banner has been named one of the top performing U.S. public banks of 2021 by S&P Global Market Intelligence. We have been recognized by Forbes as one of America's 100 best banks. And again, Banner recently was named one of the world's best banks in 2022 by Forbes. And finally, Banner Bank has received an outstanding CRA rating. Let me now turn the call over to Jill to discuss the trends in our loan portfolio and her comments on Banner's credit quality. Jill?

speaker
Joe Rice
Chief Credit Officer

Thank you, Mark, and good morning, everyone. I am pleased to be able to once again report strong and improving credit metrics this morning. Banner's delinquent loans as of March 31st remain nominal at 0.21% of total loans, flat when compared to the prior quarter and down from 0.43% as of March 31st, 2021. Adversely classified loans total 1.96% of total loans down from 2.18% as of the linked quarter and compared to 3.13% of total loans as of March 31st, 2021. Non-performing assets remain low at 19.1 million and include non-performing loans of 18.6 million and REO and other assets of 446,000. This represents 0.11% of total assets, down 3 basis points from the linked quarter and 12 basis points when compared to March 31, 2021. Gross loan losses in the quarter were nominal and were more than offset by recoveries of prior charge-offs, with a net recovery of $748,000 posted as of March 31. Based on the continued improvement in asset quality, we released an additional $7.4 million from our reserve for credit losses as of March 31. This was partially offset by an increase in our reserve for unfunded loan commitments of $428,000 for a net release of $7 million. After the release, our ACL reserve totaled $125.5 million or 1.38% of total loans as of March 31st, down seven basis points from the linked quarter and compares to a reserve of 1.57% as of March 31st, 2021. The Reserve provides 674% coverage of our non-performing loans. Looking at the loan portfolio, we again reported strong loan origination. Our commercial and commercial real estate pipelines are solid and for the quarter we reported core portfolio loan growth excluding PPP loans of $100 million or 1.12% for the quarter and 4.6% on an annualized basis. Looking at specific product lines, CNI activity was strong in the first quarter. While the utilization rate within this category remains approximately seven basis points lower than historical norms, C&I balances nonetheless increased by 68 million, 3.7%, quarter over quarter, or 15% on an annualized basis, and are 5% higher than that recorded as of March 31st, 2021. This growth was spread across the footprint and was diversified in product type as well as by industry. In spite of solid originations, commercial real estate totals continue to be hampered by property sales as well as refinancing and are down $14 million in the quarter or 1% on an annualized basis. On a year-over-year basis, however, commercial real estate totals are up 5%. The majority of the decline in the quarter is located within the small balance CRE totals, down $120 million or 9%. Much of this decline was offset by increases in the multifamily portfolio which grew by $68 million in the quarter, in part due to retaining a small number of before sale originations closed within our footprint. Additionally, owner-occupied CRE balances grew by $41 million in the first quarter. Construction and development loan balances also reflected strong production, especially when considered in light of the continued rapid payoff of our residential construction loans. Commercial construction balances grew by $12 million, or 7% in the quarter, and multifamily construction balances grew by 15 million or 6% in the quarter. The residential construction outstanding declined by 12 million or 2% in the quarter. The year-over-year changes in these portfolios detailed in the release reflect anticipated payoffs and the expected conversion to permanent loan status upon construction completion, as well as the replenishment of land inventory within our residential builder portfolio. While we anticipate that the recent increase in mortgage rates will have an impact on the velocity of home sales within our residential spec portfolio, I will reiterate what you have heard for the past several quarters. The housing markets in which we do business continue to be very strong, and the inventory of completed unsold homes remains at all-time lows. Demand continues to outstrip supply in many areas, and affordable housing continues to be undersupplied across the footprint. Consistent with prior periods, our total residential construction exposure remains acceptable at 6.1% of the portfolio, and of that, nearly 40% is the balance outstanding within our custom 1-4 family residential mortgage loan portfolio. When you include multifamily, commercial construction, and land, the total construction exposure remains at 14.6% of total loans. The decline in agricultural loans, down 35 million quarter over quarter, or 12.4%, is seasonal in nature and to be expected. When compared to the prior year, ag loan balances were up 11.5%, reflecting both new and expanding relationships. Consumer mortgage and home equity lines also added to the growth in the quarter, up 63 million, or 6%, which reflects increased mortgage loan production held in the portfolio, as well as the result of a successful home equity campaign to replace those balances that were paid off with home refinances over the course of 2021. Looking at asset quality briefly, adversely classified loans declined $20 million in a quarter and are down $133 million or 43% year-over-year. This includes nearly $85 million in adversely classified loans that were paid off over the past 12 months. Overall, adversely classified loans are down 58% since the pandemic induced high reported in September of 2020 and continue to be centered in the recreation and hospitality industries. I noted last quarter that our clients have adjusted to the ever-changing operating conditions and are continuing to perform well. That remains true today. Still, I am not yet ready to declare the credit cycle over. Rather, in addition to any lingering impacts from COVID variants that may impact our clients over the next several months, we are also closely monitoring the impacts of sustained inflation, commodity price increases, supply chain disruption and labor shortages, as well as the impact that the Ukraine crisis may have on the overall economy. Notwithstanding these uncertain economic drivers, our moderate risk profile remains intact. Our credit metrics continue to be strong. We have a solid reserve for loan losses, especially in light of the portfolio performance, and our capital levels continue to be well in excess of regulatory requirements. We remain well positioned for the future. With that, I'll turn the microphone over to Peter for his comments. Peter?

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Jill, and good morning, everyone. As discussed previously and as announced in our earnings release, we reported net income of $44 million, or $1.27, for diluted share for the first quarter compared to $49.9 million or $1.44 per diluted share for the fourth quarter. The 17 cent decline in earnings per share was due to a decline in net interest income and lower non-interest income partially offset by a larger provisional lease this quarter. Core revenue excluding gains and losses on securities and changes in fair value of financial instruments carried in fair value decreased $5.8 million from the prior quarter due to the wind down of the PPP loan program, lower miscellaneous income from gains on branch sales in the prior quarter, write-downs on closed branches this quarter, along with lower mortgage gain on sale. Core non-interest expenses, which exclude Banner Forward, debt extinguishment, M&A, and COVID-related expenses, declined $300,000 due primarily to lower advertising and marketing costs. Turning to the balance sheet, Total loans increased $30 million from the prior quarter end as a result of increases in held for portfolio loans partially offset by a $75 million decline in PPP loans. Excluding PPP loans and held for sale loans, portfolio loans increased $100 million or 4.6% on an annualized basis. Ending core deposits increased $235 million from the prior quarter end due to continued growth in the level of client deposit liquidity. Time deposit balances declined by $38 million from the prior quarter end, ending at $800 million, as higher cost CDs continued to roll over at lower retention rates. Turning to net interest income. Net interest income declined by $2.9 million from the prior quarter due to fewer calendar days, a decline in SBA PPP loan forgiveness, which were partially offset by higher securities income and lower funding costs. Compared to the prior quarter, loan yields decreased seven basis points due to a decline in PPP loan forgiveness processing fees. Excluding the impact of PPP loan forgiveness, prepayment penalties, interest recoveries, and acquired loan accretion, the average loan coupon increased three basis points from the prior quarter due to a smaller balance of low yielding 1% SBA PPP loans. The average interest bearing cash and investment balances declined 44 million from the prior quarter while the average yield on the combined cash and investment balances increased 10 basis points due to a lower mix invested in overnight funds and higher yield on both the securities portfolio and overnight funds. Total cost of funds declined one basis point to 12 basis points as a result of lower deposit borrowing costs. The total cost of deposits declined from seven to six basis points in the first quarter due to declines in interest-bearing retail deposit rates and ongoing repricing of the CD book while borrowing costs declined due to the payoff of higher cost junior subordinated ventures. The ratio of core deposits to total deposits was 94% in the first quarter, the same as the previous quarter. The net interest margin increased one basis point to 3.18% on a tax equivalent basis. The increase was driven by better yields on securities and overnight cash and lower funding costs offsetting lower PPP loan forgiveness income. In the coming quarters, we anticipate the pace of margin expansion to increase as a function of market interest rate increases, loan growth, and stabilization of excess deposit liquidity inflows. As we have guided in previous quarters, we anticipate laddering the excess deposit liquidity into securities portfolio at a measured pace while remaining flexible to shifts in loan demand and the yield curve. Turning to non-interest income. Total non-interest income declined $5 million from the prior quarter. The prior quarter benefited from a $2.6 million fair gain on a FinTech investment, an accounting adjustment related to an increase in the value of the company's SBA servicing asset, and gains on branch sales. Core non-interest income, excluding gains on the sales of securities, changes in investments carried at fair value, decreased $2.9 million. Deposit fees increased modestly by $800,000 while mortgage banking income declined by $1.2 million due to lower production and gain on sales spreads. Residential mortgage loan spreads compressed in the current quarter with a steepening yield curve while loan production was down 18% from the fourth quarter. Within residential mortgage production, the percentage of refinance volume remained steady at 36% of total production, the same as the prior quarter. Multifamily loan sales and gain on sale premiums were muted due to the steepening of the yield curve. Miscellaneous fee income declined $3 million due to gains on sale of closed branch locations and an accounting adjustment related to increasing the value of the company's SBA servicing asset in the prior quarter, along with modest declines in SWAP and SBA gain on sale fee income in the current quarter. Turning to non-interest expense. Total non-interest expense decreased 600,000 from the prior quarter, primarily due to lower debt extinguishment costs and lower marketing expense. Loss on the redemption of certain junior subordinated debt liabilities carried at fair value declined by 1.5 million to 800,000, while Banner Forward implementation costs increased 1.3 million to 2.5 million in the current quarter. Excluding Banner Forward, debt extinguishment, M&A, and pandemic-specific operating costs, The core noninterest expense declined $300,000. Compensation expense increased by $1.7 million due to higher severance costs, elevated payroll taxes, and medical claims expense, partially offset by a lower salary driven by FD reductions under Banner Forward. The credits for capitalized loan origination expense declined by $1.3 million due to lower held-for-sale residential mortgage and multifamily loan production. Advertising and marketing expense declined due to seasonal declines in charitable contributions, direct mail, web-based advertising, and printed media expense. In addition, as part of ongoing capital management, the company redeemed an additional $49 million of its outstanding trust's junior subordinated debentures, increased its bully holdings by $50 million, and rolled off a $50 million long-term SHLB borrowing advance. I'm pleased to report continuing progress on Banner Forward. We just completed the third quarter of implementation and are seeing evidence of the results in lower core operating expense, improving deposit fee income, while setting the stage for continued improvement in core operating expense and accelerating revenue growth in the coming quarters. Approximately 44% of the initiatives from a program value perspective have been executed and are reflected in the current quarter core run rate. with the majority of those now in place driving expense efficiency. As we discussed previously, the remaining efficiency related initiatives are anticipated to be implemented sequentially over the next two quarters with implementation of the revenue initiatives ramping up in the second half of the year and into 2023. We continue to guide towards a core expense quarterly run rate in the mid to high 80 million range before any effects of elevated wage or vendor cost inflation above historical norms. That said, our prospects for improved operating leverage remain strong as any elevated inflationary pressure on our reduced expense base will be more than offset by corresponding expansion in the bank's net interest margin. In closing, the company has begun to benefit from rising rates, and we anticipate benefiting further from additional monetary tightening as we enter the current rate cycle. This concludes my prepared remarks. Mark.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Thank you Jill and Peter for your comments. That concludes our prepared remarks and Irene will now open the call and welcome your questions.

speaker
Irene
Conference Call Coordinator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please do not hesitate to press star followed by number one on your telephone keypad now. In case you change your mind, please press star followed by the number two. Also, when preparing to ask a question, please make sure your phone is unmuted locally. And now our first question comes from Jeff Rulis from DA Davidson. Jeff, your line is open. Please go ahead.

speaker
Jeff Rulis
Analyst at D.A. Davidson

Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Good morning, Jeff. Question on the, maybe Peter, What is the remaining upfront banner forward cost, I guess, relative to the 2.5 we saw this quarter? I can't remember what the original amount was, but is there some remaining there?

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. Hi, Jeff. Yeah, we're pretty much through the majority of the implementation costs and restructuring costs at this stage. I'd anticipate one to two more million dollars of implementation costs spread out over the next two quarters, but it's going to continue to decline as we go forward into the rest of 22.

speaker
Jeff Rulis
Analyst at D.A. Davidson

Peter, your core expense, that down $300,000, what is that exact level of core rate?

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

In terms of what are expectations for core quarterly expense run rate? Is that your question?

speaker
Jeff Rulis
Analyst at D.A. Davidson

Well, yeah, for... What was the core for this quarter? I heard your commentary about mid to high 80 million range per quarter, but just what was the core this quarter?

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

A good reference, Jeff, is actually at the last page of our earnings release. We disclosed our adjusted core expense, excluding the banner forward and any other fair value or Gain related impacts to the expense base. And if you looked at that schedule, excluding those items, we've been running right around the mid to high 80 range. So we've reported $85.4 million in the way we define core expense. That also excludes B&O tax of 1.1 and core deposits. intangible amortization of another 1.4. So you'd add those two back, which are about $2.5 million. So we're right around $88 million on a core basis, the way we would normally define it in Q1.

speaker
Jeff Rulis
Analyst at D.A. Davidson

Great. Thanks. And maybe for Jill, just wanted to get a sense for the payoff activity linked quarter out of the portfolio, kind of the headwinds there, and then and then if you could comment on kind of the pipeline or outlook on growth. You know, I think there's some seasonality this quarter, but just to kind of color up the outlook for that. It sounds fairly positive, but just wanted to kind of get a little more detail there.

speaker
Joe Rice
Chief Credit Officer

Yeah, Jeff, good morning. So our expectations for loan growth continue to feel good, strong about reaching that upper single digit growth rate by the end of the year and As you called out, some of the downward trend in that first quarter is seasonal in nature, especially in the ag portfolio. The payoffs, we would expect to slow down somewhat with the change in the rate environment. The reasons we continue to feel positive about loan growth are that we're in the strong markets, strong economic engines, the business models working, the loan originations continue to be strong quarter over quarter, had one of the best quarters this quarter in terms of production. Pipelines remain solid. The ag utilization will pick back up. The commercial real estate, the spec construction and AMD utilization is way low as well because of the rebuilding of that portfolio. So that'll draw down over the year as well. So everything there bodes well for continued loan growth.

speaker
Jeff Rulis
Analyst at D.A. Davidson

Jill, just to follow that up, the payoffs linked quarter were up or down from the fourth quarter. And then given that outlook of return to growth, could you comment on the provision level at all? Do we expect to see a more modest or, you know, an end of the reverse provision and or eventually a positive provision or expense? Thanks.

speaker
Joe Rice
Chief Credit Officer

So payoffs quarter to quarter, Jeff. I'd have to get back to you for sure. I don't have that off the top of my head. They seem to be slowing, but I could be missing that. So let me shoot you a note on that to clear that up. As to the reserve, I'm going to start with what I say every time. We don't really guide to where we're going to end with our reserve, but our approach has been to be as measured as we can be within the bounds of CECL in terms of releasing reserves as we've continued through what has been A good economic environment and continued improvement in asset quality. I would anticipate that as loan growth continues, we would begin to start provisioning again. And then what I would say in terms of coverage is that that ratio is going to really ultimately be dependent upon how the economic environment plays out now throughout 2022. Okay. Thank you.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Thank you, Jeff.

speaker
Irene
Conference Call Coordinator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, our next question comes from Andrew Leash from Piper Sandler. Andrew, your line is open. Please go ahead.

speaker
Andrew Leash
Analyst at Piper Sandler

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Jill, just to follow up on some of the loan growth questions and loan growth outlook here, I'm curious, what drove the owner-occupied CRE increase this quarter?

speaker
Joe Rice
Chief Credit Officer

I can't just say exactly what, you know, I mean, we've had new business activity, expansion of activity, new property purchases, but I can't tell you exactly where it was.

speaker
Andrew Leash
Analyst at Piper Sandler

Okay, got it. And that just goes along the lines of kind of my next question is on C&I borrowers. What are they saying about their demand and CapEx needs? Are they expanding? and clearly there's a lot of room for utilization to rise, but I'm just trying to get a sense of what they're telling you and how they're feeling about their businesses.

speaker
Joe Rice
Chief Credit Officer

They're certainly being impacted by the increased commodity prices and so that is driving a little bit of increased utilization and demand. So while we've got that continued lower utilization rate, we have added lines of credit, we have increased lines of credit, we're seeing the needs for larger lines to carry more inventory. They're trying to get more inventory in as the prices are rising to the best they can to counter the supply chain issues as well. So we are seeing existing borrowers borrow and at the same time increase the size of the line, keeping that utilization down.

speaker
Andrew Leash
Analyst at Piper Sandler

Got it. Okay. That's helpful.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Andrew, this is Mark. Let me just add on to Jill's comments. You know, there's other factors at play here, obviously, you already know about, which, you know, as energy prices continue to increase, you've got wage inflation and labor constraints that are also weighing in on businesses in terms of inflation. So they are... The pipelines are considering capital expansion to try to improve productivity, giving all those factors. The one drawback or the thing that's weighing on their minds, though, is obviously the political uncertainty as to where the economy goes from here. So there are positive forces for CNI that they're going to make additional investments. It's just going to be muted a bit in some of the uncertainty. So I just wanted to add that.

speaker
Andrew Leash
Analyst at Piper Sandler

Got it. That's very helpful. And then just to follow up, construction demand, it sounds like there was clearly some this quarter. More projects are going to start to fund up as we move into the summer months. I guess what's the pipeline look there for new projects coming online or new opportunities to extend at least a construction line before those fund later this year?

speaker
Joe Rice
Chief Credit Officer

The construction lines are refreshing and continuing. The demand is strong for that. I would say that we do anticipate that with the rising rates it could slow the homebuilder sales as they're building out and affordability continues to be a concern. But the supply of available homes remains low so they're still coming in and building them and we're not seeing any Real disruption in terms of unsold inventory. It's really a low-standing inventory and strong employment conditions that make the market conditions remain good to continue that product.

speaker
Andrew Leash
Analyst at Piper Sandler

Got it. Okay, that'll make sense. Thanks for taking the questions. I'll step back.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Thank you, Andrew.

speaker
Irene
Conference Call Coordinator

The next question comes from David Seaster from Raymond James. David, your line is open. Please go ahead.

speaker
David Seaster
Analyst at Raymond James

Hey, good morning, everybody.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Good morning, David.

speaker
David Seaster
Analyst at Raymond James

You know, it's great to see you guys have made tremendous progress on the Banner Forward Initiative, and it sounds like the majority of the next steps are really on the revenue improvement side. Could you just maybe talk to some of the initiatives that are on the docket and the roadmap for those, and then just how effective... You've been at, you know, in the growth that you generated this quarter, how much was, you know, from the new client growth and deepening relationships and maybe moving upstream as part of this initiative that you guys laid out?

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, hi, David. This is Peter. I'll, you know, address those questions around Banner Forward. You know, as we've guided to the sequential nature of how Banner Forward will be in impacting our performance was, as you mentioned, was front-loaded around expense efficiencies first. We do and we have recognized the benefits of some of the initial expense efficiency initiatives in the fourth and first quarter. As you know, we consolidated seven branch locations in the first quarter. That was mid-quarter, so we're not going to see the full benefit in the run rate. of those consolidations until the second quarter due to severance and exit costs and so forth that were still in the first quarter numbers. We also announced the sale of four more branches in the second quarter that'll be executed towards the end of the second quarter. That'll reduce expenses. All those branches are small relative to the rest of our portfolio branch locations and will be accretive to to ROA when we execute them. In addition to that, there's a series of smaller incremental expense saves as we implement some efficiency initiatives across some of the support units and some of the spans and layer related reductions across our retail and commercial functions. Again, those will continue to manifest into the second quarter and ultimately in the third quarter where we really see our core base of the run rate post banner forward on the expense side. On the revenue side, we began implementing some of the fee-related initiatives mid-first quarter, so we're not seeing the full carry of those deposit fee initiatives show up yet. We'll see them show up more in the second quarter and then even more in the third quarter, two or three initiatives that are being implemented over the course of the second quarter that we'll see the benefits from in the full third and fourth quarter of the second half of this year. and then there's a series of marketing and digital marketing related initiatives in terms of customer and account acquisition that we expect to result in an acceleration of loan growth, new client acquisition that will ramp up prospectively over the second half of this year and then there's some additional loan growth on the commercial and CRE side that we're beginning to see just the very beginnings of in the first quarter related to some higher hold moments, some focus on our metro and higher growth markets, middle market. We expect those to really show up in the second half of this year and carry into 23. So again, it's going to be expense efficiency first, followed by revenue acceleration second. And we're right on track with where we expect it to be in B&R Forward. and we'll continue to report our progress as we go quarter to quarter.

speaker
David Seaster
Analyst at Raymond James

That's helpful. I appreciate that. And then appreciate your commentary too in the prepared remarks talking about the rate sensitivity and expectations for margin expansion just in light of the rising rates. And looking at the slide, you talked in the past about the impact of floors and that half of your floors are at the floors. Just Could you just remind us where those floors are and how far before you get through the majority of those and start seeing a more full impact from rising rates?

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. So in terms of the, as we disclosed in our investor deck, a little over 60% of our loan book is floating and adjustable and a little over 60% of those loans, floating and adjustable, have floors on them. If we look at the weighted average strike to index spread on those loans with floors, we're down to about 30 basis points of remaining spread recapture on a weighted balance basis. So there's still some additional short end rate movement we need to fully reprice those loans going forward. That being said, based on our current balance sheet mix and a kind of a static mix going forward. The way to think about our margin relationship to interest rates is about one third of the change in the yield curve, assuming a parallel shift shows up as an increase to our margin. So in other words, for each 25 basis points of Fed funds hike, We expect about seven to eight basis points of margin improvement, right? All things equal, assuming our current balance sheet mix of securities cash and loans. So that kind of gives you a sense. Once we cross the 100 basis point threshold with Fed funds, our loan yields improvement will accelerate because we'll have cleared all the floors and we actually expect to see loan yields move up at a faster pace once all those floors are cleared during the first 100 basis points of tightening.

speaker
David Seaster
Analyst at Raymond James

That's extremely helpful. Thank you for that. And then maybe just switching gears to touch on credit a bit more broadly. Asset quality, you guys do a phenomenal job. Very conservative approach to credit. Just kind of hearing the commentary, it sounds like you're still a bit cautious on maybe the more macro economy. Just curious, what keeps you up at night? What you're watching closely as you manage credit and and whether the macro environment, the inflationary trends that you talked about, has that led to any tightening of the credit box at all?

speaker
Joe Rice
Chief Credit Officer

It hasn't led to tightening of the credit box. I think the way I would summarize the way Banner has worked in my 20-year career here is to try to be as and so on. We don't try to be stable through all economic cycles as we can be. We don't try to shift with the wind necessarily and or the broader economy and it comes down to the sound underwriting going in. So certainly we stress credits and anticipate in a rising rate environment how we're stressing these credits at origination is just with a higher rate to make sure that they can work through the cycle. So in terms of what keeps me up at night, it isn't our loan portfolio. It is just what's going on in the world today and how that ultimately is going to impact all of us. But I feel good about our borrowers and our credit quality.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Thank you. Thank you, David.

speaker
Irene
Conference Call Coordinator

Our next question comes from Andrew Terrell from Stevens. Andrew, your line is open. Please go ahead.

speaker
Andrew Terrell
Analyst at Stephens Inc.

Thank you. Good morning.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Good morning, Andrew.

speaker
Andrew Terrell
Analyst at Stephens Inc.

Peter, I wanted to go back to just the rate sensitivity discussion. I'm looking at slide 17 of the presentation. The first 100 basis points you disclosed plus 7% to NII. The second 100 basis points, the 200 basis points scenario, and I is up 11.6%. I heard your commentary on just working past the loan floors and you should become more asset sensitive after you kind of with the second hundred basis points. I guess the disclosure here wouldn't suggest that though. So I'm just trying to get a sense of like do you assume higher deposit betas for the second hundred basis point assumption? Just any color there would be helpful.

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Your intuition is correct. My comments are around the loan yield itself. On the funding side, we have accelerated our betas increase as rates move further up the curve. Our expectation is that deposit betas will be very low in the first 100 at tightening, but they begin to accelerate in the second 100 at tightening, so our funding costs began to move up at a much higher pace proportionate to the first 100 as rates tightened. And if you look back at what Banner did in the last tightening cycle in 2017 and 18, Banner didn't move its deposit rates up at all until after the first 100 basis points of tightening the last time. and we think that's a pretty good barometer for what's likely to happen in this cycle given that that's what we did last time and this time we've got quite a bit more deposit liquidity going into the cycle than we had last time. That being said, we did see our deposit rates begin to move up more aggressively in the second 100 a tightening in the last cycle and we expect the same relationship to hold true this time and so that's really what's causing The diminished amount of net interest income growth as we go into the 2 and 300. We have accelerating betas, but further up you go in the rate curve in our models. And so that's what's causing some of the more limited growth in NAI.

speaker
Andrew Terrell
Analyst at Stephens Inc.

Okay, very good. That's really helpful. I appreciate it. And then I heard your comments on kind of continuing to take a measured pace to laddering the liquidity into the bond book. I know you obviously mentioned you monitor kind of the yield curve level and just overall loan demand at the bank as well when you're kind of making the consideration of putting liquidity to work. I guess just with the improvement we've seen over the past few months in yields, does that make you more apt to get a bit more aggressive in terms of putting some liquidities to work or is it more about considering maybe the acceleration of loan demand that you might be expecting?

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, I think, look, all things equal, given we still have an ample amount of cash sitting with the Fed. And last quarter, we laddered in about 160 million of cash into the securities portfolio. This quarter, we expect to have a higher number given the sharp increase in the long end of the yield curve, and we want to take advantage of that. So you could anticipate we'll be somewhat more aggressive this quarter than we were last quarter. in laddering some additional cash into the securities book. We have ample cash to support accelerated loan demand and potential deposit liquidity runoff, although we're not seeing any signs of deposit outflow yet with increased rates. But all things equal, we expect to be a bit more aggressive in laddering cash into the securities book this quarter.

speaker
Andrew Terrell
Analyst at Stephens Inc.

Got it. Okay. And then relative to that two and a quarter yield, I think it was around two and a quarter, maybe 2.22 you're buying at in the first quarter. Where are you buying at today just from a yield perspective?

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, we're closer to three now. So we're looking at securities on a basket average basis in the right high twos, maybe 3% at this stage.

speaker
Andrew Terrell
Analyst at Stephens Inc.

Okay. and if I can just sink one more in, I might have missed it, but did you have the net dollars of expense saves you would expect from the announced branch sale?

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, we didn't disclose the amount of expense saves. Just for reference, those branches hold a little over $200 million in deposits, so we'll expect that balance to go out and as I said earlier, these are and other smaller branches relative to the rest of our footprint. And so from a ROA, PPG ROA accretion perspective and an efficiency ratio perspective, these will be a net benefit to the go forward profitability metrics of the company once they're sold.

speaker
Andrew Terrell
Analyst at Stephens Inc.

Okay. Understood. I appreciate you taking my questions.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Thank you, Andrew.

speaker
Irene
Conference Call Coordinator

Our next question comes from Kelly Motta from KBW. Kelly, your line is open. Please go ahead.

speaker
Kelly Motta
Analyst at KBW

Thank you. Good morning. Most of my questions have been answered, but I did want to touch on loan yields and wanted to ask how new origination yields were coming in and if you've seen a nice pickup there. and we've seen loan growth across your footprint pick up. Are you seeing any competitors getting a bit more aggressive or extending a bit more on terms and standards in order to get the liquidity to work? Just interested in kind of the competitive dynamics of what you're seeing there. Thanks.

speaker
Joe Rice
Chief Credit Officer

Peter, I'll start with the competition and then I'll let you come back in with the loan yields. Competition, Kelly, is as crazy as it has ever been in terms of pricing and structure. Yes, competition is stretching the amortization periods, longer interest-only periods, low rate, and it comes from everyone. It's community banks, it's credit unions, it's insurance companies, non-bank lenders. Everyone out there is looking to put the quality assets on their balance sheet. as to yields. I'm going to throw it to Peter, and I'm not sure if there was something else in there that I forgot, but we'll circle back if I did.

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, Kelly, in terms of loan yields, we're seeing some modest improvement in the average loan yield in new corrections. It's running in the low fours right now, and we expect that to continue to improve as the yield curve continues to move up. and the loan yields that we're putting on now are accretive to the average portfolio yield. So as we've always said, we've remained, as Jill said in the past, we remain disciplined on not just credit structure, but also pricing. And so we have turned away deals for price and remain disciplined around that. But we are seeing yields come on that are accretive to the portfolio now.

speaker
Kelly Motta
Analyst at KBW

That's super helpful. And maybe just kind of a high-level question about Banner Forward. I know you're working on extending your customer base and penetration of existing customers. And I was just wondering if that's led mostly with the credit side or the loan side or if we should expect kind of – and some increases in deposits from that as well, which could potentially help mitigate the slower deposit growth that we're all expecting with liquidity getting put to work.

speaker
Peter Connor
Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, I'll take a response there. Kelly, as we talked about, there's a number of initiatives that comprise Banner Forward and you've heard us discuss several of those are in the commercial banking and small business banking arena with an emphasis on accelerating new client acquisition and deepening our relationships in that line of business and as part of that we expect to bring in the entire relationship with the client which would be not just the loan but their operating accounts and including treasury management needs which would bring with it some additional deposits and funding. So those initiatives that are focused on accelerating revenue and production in the commercial side and small business banking will bring with them deposits, although I would tell you overall there's going to be more of a loan focus overall. So I would characterize that the loan-to-deposit ratio of that new business has a more balanced loan to deposit mix than our existing portfolio. So we expect that the overall benefit will be to improve our earning asset mix across those initiatives. And then there's a series of other initiatives on the retail and consumer side that also contemplate bringing in additional accounts and clients that will bring both loan and deposits right through many of our digital and marketing initiatives. Those will bring in a full relationship as well. But again, those are again focused on the loan side and we expect the mix of the overall business to be very balanced between loan and deposit growth across those new clients.

speaker
Kelly Motta
Analyst at KBW

That's so helpful. Thank you so much.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Thank you, Kelly.

speaker
Irene
Conference Call Coordinator

Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please do not hesitate to press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad now. In case you change your mind, please press star followed by the number two. We have a follow-up question from Andrew Terrell from Stevens. Andrew, your line is open. Please go ahead.

speaker
Andrew Terrell
Analyst at Stephens Inc.

Hey, thanks for taking the follow-up. I just wanted to ask, there's been a lot of M&A really kind of across your footprint over the past year or so, both completed and just announced. Are you starting to see any kind of accelerated ability to attract either customers or new talent to the bank just as a result of maybe some of the M&A disruption?

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Yes, Andrew, this is Mark. I'll answer that question and ask others to follow in. Look, I think at the end of the day, there's been enough uncertainty that's gone on in some of the institutions that are combining. And it's created a large number of conversations as to what the next steps for bankers are. Clients are taking notice. Their clients are taking notice of what may be a transitioning decision making and or relationship managers. So it's at the beginning phase, I would characterize, of us being able to take advantage of it. We are doing so right now in terms of building pipelines, both talent pipelines as well as client pipelines. But the real gist of us being able to take advantage of it is going to be around conversion dates and as new structures are rolled out, decision-making bodies are changed. that's when we're going to have the real opportunity as you would expect a lot of the institutions that are in the process of orchestrating a combination have have locked up some of the key players in terms of retention bonuses and in just waiting to see until those can that conversion takes place or the structure the new structure takes place I would expect that to accelerate for us the benefit to accelerate for us at exactly the right time that banner forward and other initiatives will take hold, which will be nearing the second half of this year.

speaker
Andrew Terrell
Analyst at Stephens Inc.

Understood. Okay. And then maybe just one last one as well, just kind of given some of those comments, maybe does the organic kind of opportunity both from Banner forward and then some maybe potential hiring or customer acquisition as well, does that lead you to be, I guess, more inclined to focus organically at the franchise as opposed to looking to do M&A yourself or do you still remain open to M&A?

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Our M&A strategy has not changed. It hasn't changed through the cycle or coming out of the pandemic or as of right now. We have always been opportunistic in how we've approached M&A. We've been very disciplined in how we look at a combination and how it will affect our A business model that's clearly been successful through some of the outside recognition that you'll identify in our investor deck. So the business model is working well. What we don't want to do is do something that's going to be fraught with execution risks that will jeopardize the momentum of that business model. And we are right now taking advantage of it. It's not just through the combination or disruption that's occurring in our footprint. We're also taking advantage. We've hired some great talent from the larger institutions, the larger financial institutions, specifically in the California market. So I think all the way around, we're looking at both a dual strategy of organic growth, adding additional talent that can accelerate our banner forward organic growth. But at the same time, we're very open to opportunistic combinations. And we have, as you'll recall, we do have a very talented integration team internally. obviously led by our executive vice president, Cindy Purcell, who's done over eight of our integrations. So we stand ready to do something should the opportunity arise.

speaker
Andrew Terrell
Analyst at Stephens Inc.

Okay. Very good. I really appreciate the color, and thank you all for taking my questions.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

You bet, Andrew. Thank you.

speaker
Irene
Conference Call Coordinator

Currently, we have no further questions. Therefore, I will now hand back to your host, Mark Grescovich, for any closing remarks. Mark, please go ahead.

speaker
Mark Grescovich
President and CEO

Thank you, Irene. And as I've stated, we are very pleased and proud of the Banner team and our solid first quarter performance. Thank you very much for your interest in Banner and joining us on our call today. We look forward to reporting our results to you again in the future. Thank you, everyone, and have a wonderful day.

speaker
Irene
Conference Call Coordinator

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for being with us today. Have a lovely day ahead. You may disconnect your lines now.

Disclaimer

This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

-

-