This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk01: Hello, everyone, and a warm welcome to the Popular Inc. Q1 2022 earnings call. My name is Simona, and I'll be coordinating your call today. If you would like to register a question in preparation for the Q&A session, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. With that, I have the pleasure of handing over to Paul Cardillo, Investor Relations Officer at Popular Inc. Please go ahead, Paul.
spk10: Good morning, and thank you for joining us. With us on the call today is our CEO, Ignacio Alvarez, our COO, Javier Ferrer, our CFO, Carlos Vasquez, and our CRO, Lidio Soriano. They will review our results for the first quarter and then answer your questions. Other members of our management team will also be available during the Q&A session. Before we start, I would like to remind you that on today's call, we may make forward-looking statements that are based on management's current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are set forth within today's earnings press release and are detailed in our SEC filing. You may find today's press release and our SEC filings on our webpage at popular.com. I will now turn the call over to our CEO, Ignacio Alvarez.
spk08: Good morning, and thank you for joining the call. We began the year with a very strong quarter, achieving a net income of $212 million. Our results reflect the continued recovery and economic activity, our diversified sources of revenue, and prudent risk management. Please turn to slide three. Our quarterly net income of $212 million was $6 million higher than the fourth quarter and $51 million lower than the same quarter of 2021, which included significant reserve releases. The sequential variance was driven by lower expenses and a lower tax rate, partially offset by a lower benefit in the provision for credit losses, lower net interest income, and lower fee income. During the quarter, loan growth was solid and broad-based, both geographically and across all loan segments. Commercial loans grew during the period at both PPPR and PB, despite the continued runoff of PPP loans. Our margins in Puerto Rico continue to be impacted by our asset mix. However, we are well-positioned to benefit from higher market rates. Credit quality trends continue to be favorable during the period, with a low level of net charge-offs and decreasing non-performing loans. With increasing expectations to digitize and improve our customer experience, we are constantly assessing and investing in our capabilities. In February, we entered into an agreement with Evertech to acquire key customer-facing channels and to extend important commercial agreements. We expect this transaction will allow us to enhance our client experience and provide us with greater flexibility to meet our customers' needs. During the quarter, we continue to return capital to our shareholders. In March, we entered into a 400 million accelerated share repurchase program, and on April 1st, we paid a dividend of 55 cents per common share, an increase of 10 cents per share. Please turn to slide four. Our customer base in Puerto Rico grew by more than 6,000 since March 2021 and by 19% since March 2020. We captured two-thirds of the power, increased by $302 million, or 4%. Auto loan and lease balances at BPPR increased by 1.25%, and consumer demand remains robust. The dollar value of credit and debit card sales for our customers has continued to trend higher, increasing by 5% compared to the same quarter a year ago. The housing market continues to be strong. However, mortgage originations have been impacted by rising rates. The dollar value of mortgage originations at BPPR decreased by 28% year over year in the first quarter, but was more than 60% higher than the same period in 2019 in 2020. Please turn to slide five for an update on the current macroeconomic environment in Puerto Rico. The Puerto Rico economy performed well during the first quarter with business trends and customer activity remaining solid. Auto sales increased by 1% in the first quarter compared to the same period in 2021. This was the highest level of new auto sales seen during the first quarter in more than a decade. The Puerto Rico Economic Activity Index, which includes total employment, cement sales, electricity generation, and gasoline sales, has been steadily improving and has exceeded pre-pandemic levels for more than the past five months. We are particularly encouraged by the positive employment trends. In March, total employment in Puerto Rico reached its highest level in recent history. Additionally, the March 22 unemployment rate of 6.5% is the lowest since records began nearly 60 years ago. It is especially encouraging that the decrease in unemployment levels was accompanied by an increase in the participation rate. Airport traffic also continued to improve. Passenger volume during the first quarter increased 35% compared to the same period a year ago and also exceeded the very strong traffic seen in the first quarter of 2019. The tourism and hospitality sector continues to be a source of strength for the local economy. Puerto Rico is a popular destination for mainland residents, and the recent increase in COVID cases does not appear to be having the same impact on consumer demand for travel as prior surges have had. We believe that the recently completed debt restructuring should be an important catalyst for Puerto Rico's fiscal and economic recovery. In short, we are very pleased with the results for the quarter. We continue to be optimistic about the prospects for the future, yet remain attentive to how the evolving geopolitical inflation and health situations may impact the economy and our clients. I now turn the call over to Carlos for more detail on our financial results.
spk07: Thank you, Ignacio. Good morning. Please turn to slide six. As usual, additional information is provided in the appendix to the slide deck. Today's earnings press release detailed variances from the fourth quarter. Net interest income for the first quarter was $494 million, a decrease of $7 million from Q4. The variance was driven by lower PPP-related income and lower income from PCD loan repayments and BPPR, along with the impact of two fewer days in the quarter. This was somewhat offset by higher income from loan growth at BBPR and PV, as well as a higher balance of investment securities. Non-interest income decreased by $10 million to $155 million. The decrease in other service fees was mainly related to seasonality in credit and debit card fees, which were lowered by $3 million due to higher purchasing activity in Q4. and 4 million contingent insurance commissions that typically happen in the last quarter of the year. Income from mortgage banking activities was 4 million lower, mainly driven by lower gain on securitization activities resulting from lower volume of transactions and unrealized premiums. These negative variances were partially offset by 3 million in higher income from investments held under the equity method. We continue to expect that the average quarterly level of non-interest income will be around $155 to $116 million. The provision for the first quarter was a benefit of $16 million. This was $18 million lower than the benefit recorded in the fourth quarter. Total operating expenses were $402 million in the quarter, a decrease of $15 million from Q4. This was driven by three factors. First, An $11 million decrease in business promotion expenses, primarily impacted by lower expenses associated with seasonal advertising, charitable donations, and credit card rewards. Second, an $11 million decrease in other operating expenses, driven by lower sundry losses by $5 million, mainly related to the termination of a white-label credit card contract, and the $5 million in permanent losses on undeveloped properties taken in Q4. Finally, a $5 million decrease in amortization of intangibles due to the write-down of a trademark in Q4. These decreases were partially offset by a $7 million increase in employment compensation costs, mostly driven by higher incentives and commissions, as well as seasonality in payroll taxes that increased by $4 million. A $4 million increase in credit and debit card processing expenses, due in part to lower volume incentives, and a $3 million increase in professional fees. For 2022, we continue to expect our average quarterly expenses to be around $415 million. We will, of course, strive to come in below this expected level of expenses. Our effective tax rate for the quarter was 19%. In 2022, we expect the effective tax rate to be between 18% and 20%. Please turn to slide seven. Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis was $548 million, $4 million higher than in the fourth quarter. Net interest margin decreased by three basis points to 2.75% in Q1. On a taxable equivalent basis, NIM was 3.05%, an increase of three basis points. The increase in FTE margin was driven primarily by higher yields on our investment portfolio by 17 basis points, due to asset composition and improved market rates. During the quarter, average balance of U.S. Treasury securities increased by $4.2 billion, while the average balance of money market investment decreased by $3.1 billion. The FTE loan yield decreased by 20 basis points in Q1 to 6.06%, driven by lower PPP amortization. PPP income in Q1 was $11 million, down from $23 million in the prior quarter due to lower recognition of fees upon forgiveness and lower balances. The yield of the portfolio was 17 percent compared to 17.9 percent in Q4. The outstanding quarterly balance of TPP loans was $173 million. The remaining unamortized portion of fees for this portfolio is $8 million, most of which we expect to recognize during the second quarter. Excluding public deposits, deposit balances grew by 4.1 billion in the quarter. As of the end of the first quarter, public deposits were roughly 15 billion, a decrease of 5 billion from Q4. While the aggregate deposit outflow associated with the completion of the public debt restructuring was approximately 10 billion, we saw 5 billion additional public deposit inflows during the first quarter. We now expect public deposit balances to fluctuate between $11 and $15 billion, slightly higher than our prior estimates. The outfall of public deposits and the deployment of a portion of our cash position into loans and investments have reduced our asset sensitivity, but we will continue to benefit from rising rates. As of March 2022, each 25 basis points change in Fed Funds would correspond to $6 to $8 million in NII per quarter. Our ending loan balances increased by $344 million. This increase occurred despite a decrease of $180 million in PPP loans. Excluding the impact of PPP, loan balances grew by $524 million in Q1, reflecting higher commercial loan balances at BPPR and Popular Bank, higher construction balances, and to a lesser extent, higher auto and personal loans. These balance increases were offset in part by continued runoff of the mortgage loan portfolio in Puerto Rico. We are encouraged by the demand for credit at BPPR and PV as net growth has occurred earlier than expected. We will continue to take advantage of the evolution of the economy and the opportunities to extend credit so we can continue to improve the use and yield of our existing liquidity. Please turn to slide eight. Capital levels remain strong. Our common equity tier one ratio in Q1 was 16.3% compared to 17.5% in Q4. Tangible book value per share in the quarter was $51.16 for a 22% decrease, driven by four factors. 1.1 billion higher accumulated unrealized losses on debt securities available for sale as a result of rising interest rates. the impact of the $400 million accelerated share repurchase program the corporation entered into in February, and declared quarterly common stock dividends. This was partially offset by the quarterly net income of $212 million. The lower mark-to-market valuation of our investment portfolio will not have an impact on our regulatory capital ratios. While this is a large, very centennial book value, the decrease in fair value of the investment portfolio should be temporary. Our investment portfolio is nearly entirely comprised of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, which carry minimal credit risk. The bond portfolio has a duration of approximately four years, and as the positions roll down the yield curve, their deferred value will converge to par and then mark down to zero. Despite extension of some cash into the investment portfolio over the last few quarters, we continue to have large cash balances. Continued extension of available liquidity into the investment portfolio will lead to higher earnings and improve tax-efficient, effective markets in this interest rate environment. Our return on tangible equity was 16.4% in the quarter. As a result of the ASR, we recognized in shareholders' equity approximately $320 million in Treasury stock and $80 million as a reduction in capital surplus. The final accounting treatment of the program will depend on the average price of the shares during the term of the ASR, scheduled to close in Q3. Our EPS in Q1 increased by 3 cents as a result of this transaction. Our capital planning schedule should result in an announcement of Popular's 2023 capital actions no later than our January 2023 webcast. The announced intention to redeploy the net gains expected from the sale of our Evercare stake is subject to the closing of the transaction and regulatory approvals. As of now, the closing is still expected for mid-year. We will continue to explore opportunities to manage our capital structure during the remainder of 2022 and in future periods. With that, I turn the call over to Lidio.
spk05: Thank you, Carlos, and good morning. Overall, Popular continued to exhibit strong credit quality trends and low credit costs with low levels of net charge-offs and decreasing MPLs. We continue to closely monitor changes in borrower performance and the pace of economic recovery given the rising interest rate environment and geopolitical uncertainty. However, we remain optimistic given recent credit performance economic outlook, and improvements in the risk profile of the corporation's loan portfolio. Turning to slide number nine, non-performing assets decreased by $22 million to $610 million this quarter, mainly driven by an NPL decrease of $28 million, offset in part by an audio increase of $5 million. The decrease in NPLs was mainly in Puerto Rico, This was driven by lower mortgage NPLs of 26 million, primarily due to the combined effects of collection efforts, increased foreclosure activity, and the ongoing low levels of early delinquency compared with pre-pandemic trends. In the U.S., NPLs remain flat quarter over quarter. Compared to the fourth quarter of last year, NPL inflows excluding consumer loans remain flat. In Puerto Rico, total inflows increased by 5 million driven by higher commercial by 4 million and higher mortgage by 2 million. In the U.S., inflows decreased by 5 million driven by a similar reduction in the mortgage portfolio as the prior quarter included the impact of loans that did not resume payment after the end of the COVID-related moratorium. The overall increase in the quarter was driven by the resumption of foreclosure activity in the Puerto Rico mortgage portfolio. At the end of the quarter, the ratio of MPLs to total loans held in portfolio was 1.8% compared to 1.9% in the previous quarter. Turning to slide number 10, net charge-offs amounted to $4 million, or an annualized five basis points of average loans held in portfolio, compared to a net recovery of 8 million in the previous quarter. The variance in net charge-off was mainly driven by the resolution in Puerto Rico of certain commercial non-performing loans in the prior quarter. The corporation allowance for credit losses decreased by 18 million, or 2.5%, to 678 million, driven mainly by reductions in qualitative research due to substantial improvements in employment levels in Puerto Rico. The ratio of allowance for credit losses to loans held in portfolio decreased slightly to 2.29% compared to 2.38% in the previous quarter. The ratio of allowance for credit losses to MPLs held in portfolio was 130% compared to 127% in the prior quarter. the provision for credit losses was a benefit of $14 million compared to a benefit of $31 million in the previous quarter. In Puerto Rico, the provision for credit losses was a benefit of $12.7 million, while in the U.S., the provision was a benefit of $1.7 million. Please turn to slide number 11. The variant allowance for credit losses was driven by changes to qualitative reserves and economic outlook as well as portfolio credit quality and mix. During the quarter, we released $26 million from our qualitative reserves driven by improvements in employment levels in Puerto Rico. In accordance with its usual practice, the Bureau of Labor Statistics completed its annual benchmark revision to the Establishment Survey Employment Series which yielded significant improvements in payroll employment. As a result, we released qualitative reserves associated with uncertainties due to the employment situation in Puerto Rico after COVID. Changes in economic scenario driven by fiscal assumptions caused the ACL to increase by 4 million. However, the microeconomic scenarios for Puerto Rico and the U.S. continue to show a positive outlook for the economy. Portfolio changes, driven mainly by credit quality, portfolio growth, and volume mix, caused the ACL to increase by 8 million. To summarize, our loan portfolio exhibited strong credit quality metrics with low net charge-offs and decreasing non-performing loans. We are optimistic, given recent credit performance, economic outlook, and improvements in the risk profile of the corporation's loan portfolios. With that, I would like to turn the the call over to Ignacio for his concluding remarks. Thank you.
spk08: Thank you, Lidio and Carlos, for your updates. APOLAR started off 2022 with a strong quarter, building on the positive momentum seen in 2021. Our results were driven by strong earnings, improved credit quality, and continued customer growth. Our planned capital actions reflect this strength. In addition to the unprecedented level of federal stimulus related to COVID, Puerto Rico still has a significant amount of hurricane recovery funds that have yet to be dispersed and which now have begun to flow at a faster pace. We expect that the combined impact of these factors, along with the continued progress on the resolution of Puerto Rico's fiscal issues, should generate considerable economic activity in many sectors for the coming years, and we are well positioned to benefit from such activity. We are optimistic about the economic outlook yet cognizant of the possible challenges to the environment resulting from the war in Ukraine, inflation, and the ongoing health situation. I am thankful to our entire team who have continued to perform at a high level and deliver results under a myriad of changing conditions. We continue investing in our people and in January increased the minimum wage paid to our employees across all our geographies. Our employees are Poplar's greatest source of strength. We are ready now to answer your questions.
spk01: Thank you, Ignacio. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad now. If you change your mind, please press star followed by two. When preparing to ask your question, please ensure your phone is unmuted locally, and if you're listening on a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before asking your question. Our first question comes from Brock Vandevliet of UBS. Brock, your line is open. Please go ahead.
spk03: Thanks for the question. Good morning.
spk08: Good morning.
spk03: I may have just missed that, but constantly hunting for economic and employment data in particular about the island. Could you review the actual number that you're citing in terms of the employment improvement?
spk08: The unemployment rate was 6.5%. And the participation rate, I didn't say it specifically, but it's 44 and change, increase about two and change from our prior reading.
spk03: Okay, got it. And in terms of the government deposits, I guess just two questions. One, you had framed out the impact of that runoff as I believe four to five basis points of NIM benefit for every billion, is that still reasonable and should we see that in Q2? And I guess secondly, what would drive that range in terms of 11 to 15 down to the low or sticking at 15?
spk07: Yeah, the range still applies, Brock, that we mentioned earlier. What's going to drive the change in that The balances within that range is normal operational activity of the government, which means that for the second quarter, since, for example, they get all the tax receipts in the second quarter, we should end up in the higher end of that range. Normally, during the rest of the year, the government spends money and they have less inflows, so the balance should come down during the rest of the year. They will have now for the first time in five years, six years, a debt payment at the beginning of July. That is new as well. So our best guess right now is that it should be higher in that range in the second quarter and then come down after that. The thing that affects that balance in ways that is very hard for us to predict is the arrival of some federal funds. So sometimes, you know, we get surprised in the upside when a particular program is triggered and a big slug of federal funds arrives. But normal flow of business should be around the highest at this point in the year and should gravitate down from here.
spk03: Okay, thanks. I'll go back to the queue.
spk01: Thank you, Brock. Our next question comes from Timor-Brazil of Wells Fargo. Please go ahead, Tim.
spk12: Hi, good morning. Starting on the loan growth, two quarters in a row of positive net growth. I heard your comment that this is coming sooner than what you had been expecting, which was for kind of net growth in the back end of the year. I'm guessing, how does the loan growth outlook change, if at all, given these last two quarters? Should we expect accelerating growth as some of the stimulus money begins to find its way into the economy? Is some of this existing growth in the fourth and the first quarter here kind of preemptive in anticipation for increased economic activity and rolls off? I guess, how do you think about loan growth going from here with these two good quarters in your pocket now?
spk08: You know, I think that definitely loan growth has a lot to do with confidence in the economy, and I think there's a lot of confidence in the economy right now, especially in the larger players. So a lot of the loan growth we saw in the larger commercial loans, both in the U.S. and in Puerto Rico. So it's hard to predict because those loans are lumpy, but we definitely have not seen any deceleration of the interest from our clients. There's a lot of activity going on. There's a lot of, you know, there's a lot of people looking at different possibilities, acquisitions, investments. So, you know, it's a bit lumpy because these loans are large, but we certainly don't see any deceleration of the loan demand at this point.
spk12: Okay. Okay. And then just looking at the swing in AOCI, can you just maybe talk through some of the internal discussions about potentially having moved some of the portfolio into a health and maturity status during the quarter? And then the duration you said is four years. Is it a pretty straight line? Should we assume about a quarter of the portfolio runs off annually and kind of extrapolate that on a quarterly basis? Or is there some... difference in the pace of cash flow in that book?
spk07: There was no substantive discussions of us moving the portfolio to health and maturity during the quarter. We have historically held the portfolio in the available for sale, so no significant expected change there. The portfolio maturities are pretty well balanced as we move forward. And when we add to the portfolio as well, we tend to layer in all our future maturities a little bit as opposed to add a big chunk in any given maturity. So we have a quite balanced portfolio. Your guess of a quarter of it every year, Juanpe will comment on. Juanpe.
spk09: Yeah, this is Juan Pablo, the treasurer. In terms of maturity structure, I'd say around 38% to 40% mature within the next three years, and then another 30% kind of between years three and five. So, again, as Carlos mentioned, the portfolio is laddered out all the way up to six or seven years. But, again, the bulk of the exposures are kind of like in the belly of the curve.
spk12: Understood. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you, Timur. Our next question comes from Brett Rabitin of Hovda Group. Please go ahead, Brett.
spk02: Hey, good morning, everyone.
spk07: Good morning, Brett. Good morning.
spk02: Wanted to ask about fee income and mortgage specifically. It seemed like the MSR mark didn't, that rates, given where rates have moved, would have been more significant. Can you maybe talk about mortgage, the MSR, and I think if I heard you correctly, $155 to $160 million, kind of guidance for quarterly fee income. You know, it would seem like you've got some movement there and other with the equity fee, so it would seem like there could be some pressure to lower into that, but wanted to make sure I understood how you were thinking about the guidance for fee income as well.
spk07: Yeah, I mean, the guidance for fee income is unchanged. As you know, there's a lot of moving parts that add up to that number of 155 to 160, and any given quarter, you know, things will come up and down. One of the reasons we keep the guidance at the aggregate level is that a lot of the things that happen tend to cancel out from quarter to quarter, so you end up at similar levels, even though specific lines may be a lot more volatile. We still feel comfortable that this is the correct range moving forward in this environment. Now, when the transaction with Aerotech closes, we will make some adjustments to that range, yes. But that hasn't happened yet, so we haven't made any adjustments yet. There will be some adjustments to the rate moving forward.
spk02: Okay, that's helpful. Any thoughts on the MSR and mortgage overall?
spk07: Yeah, on mortgage, I mean, we are seeing trends that are not dissimilar for everybody else is seeing in the country. When rates go up, the refi rate goes down. So we still have a very healthy housing market in Puerto Rico. But one of the challenges is finding a house to buy. There's very little offer of units in the island. and that makes the new market somewhat challenging. We expect to have, as we did in the first quarter, lower volumes than last quarter. As a result, we'll be securitizing less loans, and the fees from that will be lower. You know my view on the MSR. The MSR does what the MSR does. You know, the effect of rates is also the effect of extension on it. So different things will affect it at any point in time. So I take that more as a fact than something that we try to forecast or hedge.
spk02: Okay, fair enough. The other thing I really wanted to talk about was, you know, I've been looking at all the data economically, and it's been very strong. And, you know, you pointed out some of the numbers on the call so far this quarter, so far this year. And, I mean, this looks really to me like this is going to be, you know, the first year where Puerto Rico in many, many years is going to have, you know, low single-digit positive GNP growth. And there doesn't seem to be anything unrailing that, even despite higher energy prices potentially impacting retail spending, et cetera. Employment continues to be stronger. Yet it doesn't sound like you guys are taking a very bullish view on the economy, more of a wait-and-see or cautious approach. Can you give me any color around that and how you're viewing the year and if it's just that everybody sort of nervous about the yield curve, implications, et cetera, you know, global stuff, or maybe you can provide a little color on that.
spk08: I don't know. Maybe we didn't express this clearly, but I think we're very optimistic about where the economy is. I mean, the Puerto Rico economy today is as good as any of us have seen it for a long time. And, again, to me, the most important, one of the most important is employment, and really it's We have more people employed today with a lower population than we had a decade ago. So I think the biggest headwind of the economy that we're concerned about is external to Puerto Rico. It's not internal. It's what happens in the Ukraine and what that does to inflation and supply chain. But really, I think the Puerto Rico economy, as you said, is positioned to grow more solid than it has in a long time. And right now, the consumer remains healthy. Our customers have a lot of liquidity. Really, you know, the biggest problem we have is I think many people's hiring. And across the board in Puerto Rico, you know, it's staffing people for the growth. But, you know, I think we're very optimistic about the Puerto Rico economy. I think, you know, there are some legitimate concerns about external factors, you know, Ukraine, inflation, logistics, all that kind of stuff. But in terms of Puerto Rico, we're very optimistic.
spk07: Our average retail client balance is up 50% from where it was pre-pandemic, so the consumer seems to be still in a very strong position. Do keep in mind that Puerto Rico will benefit from an extended application of the federal child tax credit, and that should add some additional liquidity to the market starting this month. So there's still positives that keep giving us tailwinds, and we are positive on all of this.
spk02: Okay. Since you mentioned that on healthcare, any thoughts on Supreme Court decisions to disallow the several hundred thousand people the Medicare benefits this year?
spk08: Well, yeah, it's very disappointing. Keep in mind, though, that we didn't have that benefit until very recently when the appellate court, in fact, I don't know, they never implemented it. So it's not a benefit that we lost, that we had and lost. It's a benefit that obviously would have been very important, so it's disappointing. You know, we're hopeful that the administration will be able in the next two years that they have left, or at least before the midterms, before the Congress changes, get some of those benefits through legislation. But again, remember, that is not something we hadn't lost. That is something that the courts, the Congress had never given us, and the courts, the lower courts ruled that it was unconstitutional to discriminate against Puerto Rico, and the Supreme Court reversed that. We have had a lot of additional benefits, though. The child tax credit, which is something Puerto Rico only participated in marginally, that has been a very large benefit to Puerto Rico, so I think that's very important. And I think that has helped households in Puerto Rico deal a little bit with the inflationary pressures. You know, it's a lot of money vis-a-vis the average annual salary in Puerto Rico, the child tax credit. Again, there's a lot of money out there. I mean, stimulus is not our problem. Our problem is where to get it out. You know, there's estimates of, you know, the hurricane recovery funds is more than $50 billion yet to be spent. There's, you know, The different legislation for COVID relief, some estimates have about $10 billion left to be spent. You have the infrastructure bill that had about 2.7 in the next five years, another 1.2 after that. So there's a lot of money out there yet to be spent. How much will be spent? I don't know. This is more the supplemental Medicare is more a human rights issue than I think an economic impact issue.
spk02: Okay. I appreciate all the color.
spk01: Thank you, Brett. Our next question comes from Gerard Cassidy of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead, Gerard. Your line is open.
spk04: Thank you. Good morning, National. Good morning, Carlos.
spk07: Good morning.
spk04: Carlos, you mentioned in your prepared remarks that at the end of March, you indicated that a 25 basis point increase in Fed fund rates would lead to about a $6 million to $8 million increase in net interest income. As part of that comment, if the Fed raises Fed funds rates 50 basis points, let's say next month and possibly a second time, can you share with us what that would do? Is it an automatic double to that number or is it not that linear? And then second, as you look out through the remainder of the year and if the forward curve is accurate, I assume the $6 million to $8 million for every 25 basis points is not linear, and because of deposit betas and other things, that benefit might diminish a bit?
spk07: Yeah, I think in the short term, you can assume that it's reasonably linear. It will not necessarily be as you move later on in the year, in part because there may be other changes in the balance sheet as well that may adjust it. But in the short term... If next month is 15 instead of 25, it should be something in the ballpark of twice the rate we gave, yes. But if you're trying to think about how that may affect a rate change in September or October, that number may be somewhat different. We'll update this commentary in every webcast so you'll get an updated version.
spk04: Very good. And then you were talking earlier about the investment securities portfolio and the duration. I know in the average balance sheet, you give the yield for both the money markets, you know, trading and investment securities together. I think it was 135 basis points. What is the yield in the investment securities portfolio today? And what are you now seeing as you invest money into that portfolio? What's the new rate that you're receiving?
spk07: I have one part of the answer to that one.
spk09: Right now, the bond portfolio, including the cash, is around 135 basis points. At the margin, you've got to think that right now, depending on where you
spk04: Very good.
spk09: And then finally, the actual after tax yield is quite higher than that.
spk04: Got it. You guys talked about the growth in commercial lending in the quarter. And can you give us a little further color? Is it C&I lending, commercial and industrial lending? Is it commercial real estate mortgages that you're seeing the growth in? And is it primarily on the island or is it here in the mainland?
spk08: I think we saw it in both markets. I don't know if you want to put some more color on it, but we saw, you know, strong lending in the hospitality sector. in the multifamily sector in the U.S. So it was really across the board. We had construction lending was up also. So it was really across the board in both geographies.
spk07: It's pretty balanced too, Gerard. Commercial growth in Puerto Rico was over 161, and in the States was 135. So it's actually pretty balanced. Last quarter, it was much more heavily weighted to the popular bank than Puerto Rico, but this quarter was a lot more balanced.
spk04: Very good. And then just finally in the commercial mortgage portion, with the 10-year backing up the way it did in the month of March, was there any – change in what your guys on the front line are seeing, meaning commercial real estate mortgage folks are not looking to do as much activity right now, or is that no, it hasn't really affected them?
spk05: We haven't seen any significant change so far, no, Gerard.
spk04: Okay, great. Thank you.
spk00: Thanks.
spk01: Thank you, Gerard. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad now. Our next question comes from Alex of Piper Sandler. Alex, your line is open. Please go ahead.
spk11: Thank you. Good morning, all.
spk07: Good morning. Good morning.
spk11: A couple questions here. So with the new range on the government deposits, the $11 billion to $15 billion, does that change? And with obviously this bankruptcy kind of now in the rearview mirror, does that change your willingness to actually activate some of those deposits? I know that you're kind of sitting on a big chunk of them for a long time, kind of unsure what was going to flow out. But, you know, now that we have a little bit more clarity, could you take some of that $10.5 billion of cash on the balance sheet and maybe, you know, at least invest a little bit more in the securities portfolio?
spk07: We have been adding to Secure Portfolio every one of the last three or four quarters, I think, Alex. So we've been doing some of that. You are correct that some of the uncertainty about forward-looking balances has now gone away. So we will continue to look at our cash position and investment opportunities. The investment opportunities are obviously a lot more attractive now than they were a few quarters ago. So, you know, our willingness to extend is probably getting better because we find it more attractive now. So, this is a, you know, this is what our ALCO committee does on a weekly basis. So, we will definitely continue to extend and with less uncertainty on our balances and better investment opportunities, we'll consider extending more than we have in the last few quarters on average.
spk11: Have you done any so far during the second quarter that you can share with us?
spk07: I don't recall on the second quarter, Alex, but you should assume that we will do some in the second quarter as well.
spk11: Okay. And then, you know, when we talk about long growth and we talk about the hurricane money that still is, you know, kind of been slow to come to the island, you can kind of really parse out from some of the programs, big chunks of money that have been allocated to things like affordable housing and just, you know, some of the R3 program and the investment portfolio for growth. And you look at the numbers that are publicly available and you just, you see the projections have been pretty strong going forward, but You know, a lot of that money is really yet to be spent. You know, in the past, you've talked about kind of planning and permitting. You know, it was maybe last year, and now this year, you're starting to see a little bit of commercial growth. Are you seeing any of that related to some of these HUD programs? And if not, do you think that there's – do you have a line of sight on to sort of when some of those programs might come online? Yeah.
spk08: It's hard to get a line of sight because a lot of internal negotiations and processing going on between HUD or Core 3 and the federal government. We are starting to see it. You know, you're right. They're starting to come out slower than we hope. I mean, they just announced today the first recovery project for the Aqueduct Consumer Authority, a $2 billion project that was finally built. There is a lot of proposals. I think the last time I read it, Luma and the Power Authority have 16 projects in front of FEMA to be approved. So it's going to the project. I think the housing with the CDBG funds is moving a little bit faster. They have disbursed some money. But, again, you know, we can't have the fact it's been slower than we would have hoped. The one thing that I do think the political realities are that, you know, As the Biden administration entered their halfway mark, I think there's going to be, you know, real pressure on the administration to get more money out because obviously they were very critical of the way the Trump administration handled the funding for Puerto Rico. And really, you know, the first two years, it really hasn't dramatically increased that much. So I think just the timing, you know, the processes are further along. A lot of work has been done. I think there'll be political pressure on the federal government to show some results, especially they were highly critical of the Trump administration. It should make some progress. Now, that's the positive side. A little bit on the negative side is all these logistical challenges and inflationary challenges complicate the process of buying the stuff for projects. Some of these specialized equipment I read somewhere could take two to three years for deliveries. So, you know, the logistical challenges are real. That said, I mean, the money is starting to flow, not as fast as we want. But, again, the economy is doing very well sort of without that big inflow. So keeping a little bit of that in reserve is not necessarily a bad thing.
spk07: As an example, the government announced today that they are trying to negotiate with federal authorities for them to allow the equipment that is involved in some of the projects that will be built to rebuild the electrical sector to be purchased ahead of the final granting of the contracts. Because the way it is now, you actually have to wait for the contract to be granted to order the equipment. As Ignacio said, that equipment may have a lead time normally of eight to ten months, and nowadays it may be two years. So trying to get ahead of some of that. So that's the kind of logistical discussions that are going on. You know, hopefully they will be resolved positively so we can get more of those projects going quicker.
spk11: And theoretically, if someone wanted to purchase a big piece of equipment, you know, with the two years ahead of when the contract might be executed, is that something that they would need a bank loan to help facilitate that purchase?
spk08: Well, it depends who you're talking about. The equipment that will be the, let's say, like the power stations, that's going to be bought by LUMA or the power authority with federal funds. However, a lot of the work will be done by private contractors, and those private contractors will have to buy trucks and equipment they use to install the stuff. Now, the infrastructure itself is going to be funded by federal funds. But, again, much of the work will be done by private contractors who will have to buy equipment and that kind of thing.
spk11: That's helpful. Just a couple sort of follow-up questions. The 25 basis points equal $6 million to $8 million per quarter. Kind of what's the difference between that $6 million and the $8 million? You know, is it really liquidity from the government that defines those two kind of ends?
spk07: Yeah, largely the difference with the two ends was, you know, $20 billion in balances versus what we thought was 10, which now looks more like 11 to 15, as we mentioned. So that is the biggest delta. There's other things that will swing it, but that is the biggest delta, yes.
spk11: Okay, so if it's $15 million, then you're probably looking at around $7 million per rate per quarter. And that, just correct me if I'm wrong, that's just the short end, right? That makes no assumptions on the long end of the curve?
spk07: That is correct. And as I mentioned earlier, it is fairly lineal in the very short term, but as we get out a quarter or two, that number will probably change.
spk11: Okay, thank you. And then on the expense guide, which is unchanged from last quarter, is that reflective of the renegotiation of the Evertech contract?
spk07: No, the expense guide, it does not include that yet because that transaction has not closed. Once that transaction closes, we will update our guidance to reflect any changes that are necessary.
spk11: And that takes the CPI escalator from 5% back down to 0% for this year, right? So that could have some decent savings in the back half of this year. Am I thinking about that correctly?
spk07: Assuming that everything closes, we are assuming right now. that will provide some savings in the back end of the year, yes.
spk11: Okay. And then how should we think about the $100 million of buyback authorization that you left out of the ASR? Can you give us some thoughts on how we should be thinking about how that will be utilized over the remainder of the year?
spk07: We are still going through that analysis and making decisions on it. We are considering this together with our express intent to redeploy some of the games from Evertech. So the size and timing will depend on a number of things. So we're still working through that. We haven't made any decisions.
spk11: Okay. And then just to, you know, clarify, the capital ratio that really matters for you guys in your mind is the common equity tier one. And when we see the leverage ratio or even the tangible common equity ratio, kind of decline as a result of the size of the balance sheet or of things like the AOCI hit. Does that have any – is that something you guys pay attention to at all when you're thinking about capital actions?
spk07: I mean, remember, the AOCI has no effect on our regulatory ratios, so that didn't change the regulatory ratios. We continue to have very healthy regulatory ratios, and – At this point in time, we have no reason to think that we would change the way we look at capital return.
spk11: Okay, great. Thanks for taking my questions.
spk07: Thank you.
spk01: Thank you, Alex. We have a question from Kelly Motta of KBW. Please go ahead, Kelly.
spk06: Hi. Thank you so much for the question. Just carrying on on the topic of the buyback remaining. When you announced Evertech, you said you would be repurchasing kind of the post-Day 1 gains on the remaining sales of Evertech shares. Is that incremental on top of the $100 million you already committed, or are they kind of one in the same?
spk07: No, that would be incremental, yes.
spk06: Okay, thank you for the clarification. And then I guess with credit, I mean, things have, you had another negative provision. Things have continued to strengthen and get better, and you released a big qualitative reserve. As we kind of look out, you know, net charge-offs have been really almost negligible. Have you guys considered at all what a normalized charge-off ratio looks like now on a go-forward basis given all the relief money that is yet to be dispersed and kind of thoughts around that?
spk05: Thanks. I would say a difficult question to answer, but I will say that prior to the pandemic and all the money that is coming into Puerto Rico, the normal range of charge-off for the corporation was between 75 basis points to 125 basis points. It seems like the new normal, or in the short to medium term, would be a little bit lower than that range, so that's what we view as a part of the new normal.
spk06: Okay. Thank you. That's helpful. And then maybe just the last one from me. I really appreciate all the color around asset sensitivity. Just wondering on kind of what you're baking in for your expectations for deposit data. Do you expect it to follow a similar cadence as the last time around or given the fact that you guys all have so much liquidity, do you think you'll perform a bit better and that goes into that NII? outlook for each 25 basis points. Thanks.
spk07: Yeah, remember that we have two pieces for deposit beta, the deposit beta in the U.S. Bank and the deposit beta in the Puerto Rico Bank. The deposit beta in the U.S. Bank is much, looks a lot more like any other, you know, $10 billion bank in the eastern shore of the United States. So it's closer to changing market rates. In the case of Puerto Rico, historically, the positive betas have been lower in both directions, and they have been in the mainland. You're correct that there's a lot of liquidity. So, you know, just thinking that they will look like last time is not unrealistic. Now, what we do not know, Kelly, is especially how clients are going to react to a very fast increasing rate, especially commercial clients are the most sensitive and the most attentive to that. So if commercial clients start looking at opportunities to reinvest the cash in a different way, then that could affect the betas negatively. But as a starting point, it's not unreasonable to think that they will look like last time.
spk06: Thanks. That's really helpful. And just a small follow-up for me. Do you have a sense of or just like a prospect breakout of what or deposit base of retail versus commercial?
spk07: Yeah, give me a second, and we will give you that question. Hold on. Okay. In the bank in Puerto Rico, retail is 23, about 60% of the 39.6, almost 40 that we have. Excluding public deposits. Excluding public deposits. Okay.
spk06: Got it.
spk07: Sorry, the U.S. We have the U.S. too. The U.S. No, no, sorry. I don't have the U.S. on my right hand. We can check with the U.S. and get back to you on that.
spk06: Great. Thank you so much. Appreciate all the time today. Thank you.
spk07: Thanks, Kelly.
spk01: Thank you, Kelly. We have a follow-up question from Brock Vandervliet of UBS. Please go ahead, Brock.
spk03: Oh, thanks. Just a follow-up to that credit string of questions. Is there any, you know, just trying to dimension where the reserve could go, is there any reason to expect, given this tailwind, that it's not returning to you know, 175 to 2% as a percentage of loans over time?
spk05: Not sure what you mean, return to 175 to 2%. Again, it's also a difficult question to answer. As you know, under CECL, another important factor is the economic forecast. So when you look at the trend, it seems that the everything else being equal, that we've seen lower releases of research on a month-to-month basis, so we are sort of like getting close to a plateau, but then you have the factor related to the economic forecast. If that changes, then there could be significant impact to the reserves.
spk03: Okay. Nothing new there. On non-accruals, You know, a lot of that, 75% is resi mortgage. Is there, you know, some guidance where we should expect, you know, just an ever-present large component of resi mortgage just because of the way the market is on the island? I'm just trying to dimension, you know, the potential increases ahead in non-performers.
spk05: I mean, that has always been the case of our business in Puerto Rico. MPLs have mostly and largely been residential mortgage loans, and that is in part due to the fact that the foreclosure process in Puerto Rico takes very, very long. So I would expect going forward that that will continue to be the case.
spk03: Okay, but the commercial could trend lower. Okay. Okay. All right, thank you. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you, Brock. We currently have no further questions, so I'll hand back to Popular CEO Ignacio for any closing remarks.
spk08: Thanks again for joining us and for your questions. We look forward to updating you on our progress in our July conference call. Take care.
spk01: This concludes the Popular Inc Q1 2022 earnings call. Thank you all for joining. We hope you have a great rest of your day. You may now disconnect your lines.
Disclaimer