This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk07: Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Berry Corporation Q3 2023 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 1-1 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 1-1 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker, Todd Crabtree with Investor Relations. Todd, the floor is yours.
spk01: Thank you, Liz, and welcome, everyone. Thank you for joining us for Barry's third quarter 2023 earnings webcast. Earlier today, Barry issued an earnings release highlighting 2023 third quarter results. Speaking this morning will be Fernando Araujo, our chief executive officer, and Mike Helm, our chief financial officer. Before we begin, I would like to call your attention to the safe harbor language found in our earnings release that was issued this morning. The release and today's discussion contain certain projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. These include risks and other factors outlined in our filings with the SEC, including our 10-Q, which will be filed later today. Our website, bry.com, has a link to the earnings release and our most recent investor presentation. Any information, including forward-looking statements made on this call or contained in the earnings release, and that presentation reflects our analysis as of the date made. We have no plans or duty to update them except as required by law. Please refer to the tables in our earnings release and on our website for reconciliation between all adjusted measures mentioned in today's call and related gap measures. We will also post the replay link of this call and the transcript on our website. I will now turn the call over to Fernando.
spk02: Thanks, Todd. Welcome, everyone, and thank you for joining us. In the third quarter, we continue to deliver strong financial and operational results, generating $70 million in adjusted EBITDA and producing 25,300 barrels a day. We execute on our strategy to maximize shareholder value and generate meaningful and sustainable cash flow. In line with our shareholder return model, the board declared total dividends of 21 cents per share, a 50% increase compared to the prior quarter. We are currently on track to meet our goal to deliver 2023 cash return in the high single digits based on our current stock price. On September 15th, we closed our $70 million acquisition of McPherson Energy Corporation, delivering on our strategy to acquire accretive producing bolt-on assets. We have integrated the McPherson assets and people into BERI and have identified and already started implementing several initiatives that will reduce long-term costs and improve free cash flow. When we announced this acquisition, we said that we expected these assets to enhance BERI's free cash flow by 15 to 25% in 2024. Based on our cost savings opportunities implemented so far, we now expect to exceed these free cash flow estimates. An average daily production in Q3 was higher than the average for the first half of 2023. This is an outstanding achievement considering that we are on track to spend approximately 30% less capital in 2023 than originally planned due to our reallocation of capital to fund a portion of the MacPherson transaction. Base production continues to outperform our expectations for the year. especially in the thermal diatomite reservoir, where we have optimized our steam injection strategy, the results of which are shown on slide 12 of our investor deck. We expect our 2023 production to be in the mid-range of guidance, which has increased in connection with the closing of the MacPherson transaction. Our ongoing initiatives to lower operating and G&A expenses continue to bear fruit. Operating expenses on a BOE basis were about 10% lower in the third quarter than the first half of the year. Similarly, we reduced adjusted GNA by more than 2 million or 12% quarter over quarter. We are still focused on lowering our cost structure in Q4 and into 2024. In Q3, we had promising test results from a well targeting light oil and gas reservoirs, which do not require steam to produce. in an undeveloped block in the Midway Sunset field. We are still executing the testing program. Initial production results are exceeding our expectations and are being sold via existing infrastructure. This project highlights the quality of our oil-rich assets in the San Joaquin Basin, even after 100 years of production. There are still meaningful opportunities remaining across our acres. I'm excited about these new development opportunities. I look forward to providing further updates in the coming months. I will now turn the call over to Mike.
spk06: Thank you, Fernando. As always, more information is available in our earnings release issued this morning and in our 10Q filing available later today. But here are a few highlights. We delivered another quarter of strong financial and operational results. We generated adjusted EBITDA totaling $70 million and adjusted free cash flow of $35 million. Each were a slight increase quarter over quarter. In accordance with our shareholder return model, 20% of the third quarter adjusted free cash flow will be used to pay a variable dividend. And we used the remaining 80% to fund a portion of the McPherson acquisition. Most of the adjusted free cash flow expected to be generated in the fourth quarter will be used for debt reduction. we're actively evaluating the optimal use of the free cash flow we plan to generate in 2024 and beyond. With the enhanced cash flows from the Pearson acquisition, we currently expect to further improve our leverage, including through debt reduction. We'll provide additional details on those efforts in conjunction with announcing our 2024 capital plans in the first quarter of next year. Barrick continues to achieve its operational and financial targets. We're delivering strong cash flows, and remain well-positioned to continue to maximize shareholder returns while looking at ways to optimize our dynamic shareholder return model. Back to you, Fernando.
spk02: Thanks, Mike. Our third quarter results demonstrate our ongoing ability to maintain operational excellence and deliver strong shareholder returns. We are on track to meet our annual operating expense and production goals with lower CAPEX and V&A expenses. We're also excited about the new development opportunity in our midway sunset field. Additionally, we are aggressively pursuing accretive producing growth opportunities in and outside of California and will support our overall strategy to enhance future free cash flows and shareholder value. With that, I will turn the call over to the operator for questions.
spk07: Great. Thank you. At this time, we will conduct the question and answer session. As a reminder, to ask a question you will need to press star one one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. The first question will be coming from Charles Mead. with Johnson Rice. Your line is now open.
spk03: Good morning, Fernando, Mike, and to the whole Berry team there. Hey, Charles. Fernando, good morning to you. Fernando, you mentioned that my question is about this new play, this new development concept of Midway Sunset. I guess there's two aspects of the question. One, you mentioned that it's performing better than your expectations, but Could you give us a sense of what your expectations are? And maybe as part of that, you can tell us, give us an idea for what this means at the kind of individual project or well level. What kind of productivity or what kind of resources are we talking about? And what your sense is of the total inventory of this kind of opportunity?
spk02: That's a very good question, Charles. Let me give you a little background on the project itself. We're currently testing an undeveloped block in the north end of our midway sunset field. And this block is subdivided into different full blocks. And we are targeting deeper reservoirs, oil and gas reservoirs, which should be recoverable without steam. Now, these are stacked reservoirs. We're talking about three or four different reservoirs. And in this first well, this first sidetrack, we're testing seven different intervals. Now, the deeper of the intervals, that's the one that we've tested so far in the Santos Formation. We're seeing production in the low triple digits, which is better than our normal production from development activities in California, so that's very encouraging. Now, outside of this sidetrack, we also have two recompletions that we executed in the same block, and we're currently producing oil and gas from those recompletions as well from the shallower Antelope Reservoir. Now, one thing to note is that for future development, we could develop this field with mostly sidetracks as we've got about 100 or so idle wells nearby that we can utilize to sidetrack and develop this field possibly. And then in terms of potential, obviously, we're still evaluating this asset. and we'll update you in due time. But we're looking at potential opportunities in terms of locations in the mid-double digits for now. It could be better than that, depending on the results that we have. But again, it's very, very encouraging, and we'll be drilling the second well, the offset well, in this block come at the end of November. So there's more information to come, but it is very, very exciting.
spk03: Yeah, it sounds that way. Is the Santos a traditional field pay? Are you guys testing new horizons that have not historically been developed?
spk02: No, we're currently not producing from the Santos ourselves, but we have offset operators, nearby operators that have produced from the Santos in the past.
spk03: Got it. Got it. That does sound really compelling. The second question, if that other one didn't count, I feel like, Fernando, I feel like you guys were telegraphing in your press release that I guess you're angling more towards non-California acquisition opportunities. Should we think about those as being in Utah, which is your other operating area, or are you trying to signal that you're looking beyond Utah?
spk02: Let me give you the full story on that. And yes, we are aggressively pursuing M&A activity in and outside of California. We're looking for scale. You know, in California, we're still focusing on bolt-ons, you know, similar to the McPherson that we can add value and realize operational efficiencies. But outside of California, we're really focusing on accretive assets, assets with known geology, assets where we can maintain our production flat and thus maintain our cash flow deliverability flat for years to come. In terms of basins, initially, we're focusing in the western Rockies, you know, basins like the Uinta, Peons, Powder River. But in reality, we're basin agnostic if we find the right asset with the right opportunity where we can maintain our production flat and deliver cash returns. That'll be an asset that we look at.
spk03: Great. I appreciate that in detail. Thank you.
spk07: Please stand by for the next question. The next question comes from Nicholas Pope with Seaport Research. Nicholas Pope, you are live.
spk04: Good morning, everyone. Hey, good morning. I was hoping to follow on a little bit with Charles' question on M&A. Kind of in that same line of thinking, curious how you're thinking about funding. Any potential acquisitions, obviously, with the McPherson? You pulled down on CapEx. You got a fair amount drawn on the credit facility here coming out of the quarter. So just curious, what the thinking is as you look at some of this potential M&A about how you might fund it, either through cash or through what's available in the credit facility.
spk06: Yeah, Nick, this is Mike. A couple ways to think about that. When you think about kind of the smaller ones, the bolt-on types like McPherson, we do like using the RBL. And part of the reason we like doing that is we can get it paid off really quickly. And then once that's paid off quickly, you can get the cash flow just falls right to the bottom line. To your point, we are on the line, and we just finished the McPherson acquisition just before the end of the quarter. So it's not surprising to see the RBL in use there at the end of the quarter. But part of the story there is capital reallocation. So we have started reducing our capital. We'll continue to do that for the rest of the year and even looking into next year maybe. to really help fund the purchase price of McPherson. And we would do something similar to a similar bolt-on. So that's why those things kind of pay off quickly. As for larger acquisitions, yeah, it really depends on what the opportunity is and kind of who we're talking to. But we think there's multiple ways to finance that, including equity in addition to raising debt. And in that regard, it would have to make sense from all of our financial metrics, including leverage. We don't have the appetite to increase our leverage on a long-term basis. So it would have to make sense from the financial metrics, but those are really kind of the ways that we're thinking about it.
spk04: Got it. That's very helpful. Thank you. And then kind of back to this new development work that y'all are doing in Midway Sunset, just clarification, any planned development, is that all expected to be vertical development? Is that like fairly, you know, kind of lower cost, no big horizontals? Is that the right way to think about this?
spk02: Yeah, that's correct. There would be a vertical development. If we were to drill new wells, it would be vertical with sidetracks. It would be directional just because we would have to access the reservoir through the existing wellbores, but it's not a horizontal play. It's a vertical play.
spk04: I appreciate it. That's all I have. Thanks, guys.
spk07: Please stand by for the next question. Although, I want to remind you, if you'd like to ask a question, you will need to press star 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, you would press star 11 again. The next call comes from Steven Bush with Everglades Resources Inc. Your line is now open.
spk05: Good morning, gentlemen. Thank you for taking my call. So on these sidetrack possibilities, you're doing that so that they don't require permits. Is that correct?
spk02: Well, they do require permits, but it's not a new well permit. It's similar to a work over permit for an existing well.
spk05: And that's still being given out in California?
spk02: Yes, California is still, industry is still getting work over permits and sidetrack permits. That's correct.
spk05: Okay, perfect. And how's the permit outlook in general for new wells?
spk02: In terms of specific numbers for us, we currently have about 34 permits in hand, sidetrack permits in hand that we expect to execute and utilize in 2024. Now, outside of that, we've got it in a separate bucket. We've got about 26 permits that we call contingent, and they're contingent because they're contingent on further technical work and results. And on top of that, we've submitted well over 100 permits, in fact, 145 permits for new wells and sidetracks, 80 of which already have what we call CEQA approval from CalGEM. And then additional to that, we also have over 100 workover permits in hand. The message here is that we have a lot of permits in hand for activity coming up, especially for the first half of 2024.
spk05: Okay, that's good to know. So just a quick question on the derivative hedges. I mean, it's always up and down. Those are all mark-to-market and not cash. Is that correct?
spk06: Some of it. Oh, the losses that show up in the income statement are predominantly mark-to-market. You're right.
spk05: Okay. And then are we doing any naked derivatives or is it all covered with production, et cetera? Well, it's all covered. Right. So there's no speculating. I just want to make sure of that part.
spk06: No, no, no. Absolutely not.
spk05: And there's a lot of reasons why it's not. Absolutely. Okay. Perfect. That's all I have. Look forward to hearing more.
spk02: Thank you for the questions.
spk07: I am showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn it back to Chief Executive Officer Fernando Araujo.
spk02: Thank you, everyone, and thank you for your interest and very thank you for your time. If we don't talk before Thanksgiving, happy Thanksgiving to all. And once again, thank you for your time.
spk07: Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program and you may now disconnect.
Disclaimer