Pathward Financial, Inc.

Q1 2021 Earnings Conference Call

1/27/2021

spk02: Thank you, and welcome to the Meta Financial Group conference call and webcast, where President and CEO Brad Hanson and Executive Vice President and CFO Glenn Herrick will discuss the results of our first fiscal quarter ended December 31st, 2020. Also participating in the call is Brett Farr, Co-President and COO of MetaBank. Additional information, including the earnings release and investor presentation, may be found on our website at metafinancialgroup.com. As a reminder, our comments may include forward-looking statements. Those statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual and anticipated results to differ. The company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. Please refer to the cautionary language in the earnings release, investor presentation, and in MEDIS filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent filings, for additional information covering factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements. Additionally, today we will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures on this conference call. References to non-GAAP measures are only provided to assist you in understanding META's results and performance trends. Reconciliations for such non-GAAP measures are included within the appendix of the investor presentation. Now, I will turn the call over to Brad Hanson.
spk09: Thanks, Brittany. Thank you all for joining Meta Financial's first fiscal quarter year 2021 earnings call. It is my pleasure to discuss our strong results achieved in the first fiscal quarter. I want to start by acknowledging our excellent team and thank our employees for generating these results while dealing with the challenges of the pandemic and serving our customers remotely. Compared to the same quarter last year, revenue was up 9 percent to $111 million, net income was up 33 percent to $28 million, and earnings per share was up 50 percent to 84 cents per share. Our focus on improving our efficiency ratio resulted in improvement of six percentage points to 62.2 percent over last year, which was achieved without any COVID-related layoffs, or salary reductions. Our loan portfolios continue to perform well. Non-performing loans and leases as a percentage of loans and leases for commercial finance were 86 basis points, the lowest level in over a year and a half. As Brett will discuss, we remain focused on the hospitality and movie theater loans in our legacy community bank portfolio, as well as our small ticket leasing and finance relationships in our commercial finance division, and we stay in regular contact with those borrowers. Due to our conservative approach to ramping up provision during the early days of the pandemic, we believe that current reserves are adequate to withstand projected losses in the existing portfolio. The effects of government stimulus programs have had a significant impact on our balance sheet. These programs include the Paycheck Protection Program loans, economic impact payments, or EIP, and enhanced unemployment benefits that flow through to existing card programs. Total average payments divisions deposits, including stimulus funds associated with EIP programs, were up 83% year over year. While it's not possible to determine the exact amount of the deposit growth associated with government stimulus programs, our analysis of our deposit base, including several large programs that we moved over from other banks during the year, lead us to believe a more realistic run rate would be somewhere in the mid-teens, excluding any stimulus-related impact. Card and deposit fee income for our payments division is up 5% over the first fiscal quarter of last year to $22.6 million. This was quite an accomplishment given the lower card volumes, especially in our loyalty awards and promotions or rebate card area and our gift card promotions programs that were caused by COVID-related shutdowns during the latter half of the fiscal year. Some of this volume, especially in gift cards, rebounded nicely in the fiscal first quarter of 2021. In addition, fee income was negatively impacted from the previous year by the closure of two program managers who were forced to cease operations due to the pandemic. Fortunately, increased activity on other card programs and our new transaction-related payments initiatives, like Faster Payments and Acquiring, more than made up for these reductions. Overall, fee income plays an important role in our financial performance, accounting for 49 percent of total revenue for the last 12 months. We expect our fee income-related programs to be an even bigger part of our story going forward. As previously mentioned, MetaBank is a financial agent of the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service and was tasked with issuing prepaid debit cards for disbursement of economic impact payments to consumers under the CARES Act during fiscal year 2020. We recently reported that we were again tasked to distribute prepaid debit cards to individuals as part of the second round of the EIP program to accommodate this program. We have partnered with Pfizer and Visa to distribute approximately 11.6 million cars totaling $13.5 billion in stimulus funds for the two programs combined. Obviously, a program of this size has significant impact on our balance sheet and performance metrics. For example, our capital leverage ratio, net interest margin, and return on assets will be skewed much lower since the associated deposits are held in cash. Risk-based capital ratios remain largely unchanged, and we should see a slightly positive impact on earnings overall. Additionally, we are working closely with our regulators, the OCC and the Federal Reserve. The OCC has granted us an exemption from meeting capital leverage ratios due to the significant but temporary increase in deposits associated with the EIP program. We remain in good standing with regulatory agencies, will not be deemed undercapitalized, and will not be under any regulatory restrictions due to our participation in this program. Now I'd like to spend a few minutes to talk about our mission. and some of the important enhancements we made to our environmental, social, and governance programs during the quarter. Our long-term mission is providing financial inclusion for all. Meta is a financial enablement company who works with FinTech and FinServ innovators to increase financial availability, choice, and opportunity for all. Banking as a service has always been a core feature of our business model, And I like to say that we offered banking as a service since before it was cool. Our national bank charter, coordination with regulators, and deep understanding of risk mitigation and compliance allows us to guide and support our partners to deliver financial products to those who need them most and contribute to the social benefit of communities we serve. MetaBank is the fiduciary who issues the accounts, holds the funds, and manages the money, moving billions of dollars each day. Our years of experience and proprietary techniques for actively monitoring collateral and mitigating risk allows us to enter markets and serve customers that traditional financial institutions often shy away from. We go where others won't because we're willing to do the hard work that others don't. Our mission and ESG efforts are strongly aligned with them and embedded in our strategy so that our priorities stay fixed on helping our communities to move towards prosperity and success. ESG along with diversity, equity, and inclusion are critical to the long-term success of our company and our commitment to them is reflected in our hiring of a vice president of ESG and community impact who is responsible for advancing and sustaining a measurable ESG strategy and community outreach effort. This initiative will be overseen by a newly formed ESG committee of our board of directors. Medibank is committed to expanding who and how the financial industry helps, and we strongly believe that financial enablement and economic mobility are fundamental to our cause. These key ESG enhancements are meant to ensure that we stay true to our mission, helping those at the heart of the real economy by providing pathways towards prosperity and success as we endeavor to bring financial inclusion to all. Now let me turn the call over to Brett to provide some updates on our lines of business.
spk07: Thank you, Brad. Today, I'll share some updates on a few of our business lines not yet covered, starting with commercial finance. At December 31st, commercial finance loans made up 70% of the company's gross loan and lease portfolio and totaled $2.42 billion, a 5% increase from the linked quarter. We saw solid growth in term lending, primarily related to our solar lending business, and strong asset-based lending originations. During the quarter, our solar credits balance increased 29 percent from last quarter to $323.9 million. While we have a strong pipeline, we expect that we could see a slowdown in asset-based lending and factoring as a result of the second round of PPP loans reducing temporary demand for funding. From a credit perspective, We continue to closely monitor each of our lending portfolios, paying significant attention to our legacy community bank hospitality and movie theater loans, as well as our small ticket equipment finance relationships in the Crestmark division. Our credit management team has remained in regular contact with these borrowers, and we feel comfortable with the level of reserves and collateral in place on these credits. Our legacy community bank portfolio balances continue to decline as the portfolio winds down. The portfolio is performing well, and we have not experienced any further deterioration as such. We believe our credit metrics demonstrate the company's ability to weather the worst of the pandemic. Movie theater and hospitality loans in our legacy community bank portfolio continue to account for most of our total deferral balances. Our current level of reserves reflects the elevated level of risk in these portfolios, but we are pleased that we are starting to see some positive developments in these relationships. For example, most of the hospitality loans that were on deferral are now back to making P&I payments. In our consumer lending portfolios, credit remains strong, and we have seen no measurable change in performance due to COVID-19. This reinforces the strength of our program structuring and guardrails in place. Nonperforming assets increased slightly during the quarter, primarily related to an increase in legacy community banking nonperforming loans. The increase in nonaccrual balances was driven by one community bank relationship operating in the movie theater industry that moved to nonaccrual status in the fiscal 2021 first quarter. As a reminder, this relationship is roughly 50% reserved for it. We believe this to be isolated and not a representation of our overall loan and lease portfolio. Finally, I would like to highlight our money line relationship, as it is a great example of banking as a service and how we are leveraging our balance sheet to create relationships that advance our capabilities and create future revenue generating opportunities. Through our venture capital arm, MetaVentures, We were a strategic investor in MoneyLion before we helped power their checking account product called Vore Money. MetaVentures is focused on investing in early-stage companies that are on the cutting edge of payments and likely to be future users of our platform. By investing in and partnering with fintechs like MoneyLion, we continue to stay on the forefront of payments industry innovation. Now I'd like to turn it over to Glenn Herrick.
spk05: Thank you, Brett, and good afternoon, everyone. Total revenue for the fiscal 2021 first quarter was $111 million, an increase of 9 percent compared to the same quarter last year. The increase in revenue benefited from the previously disclosed $5 million loss from the sale of foreclosed property during the last year's first fiscal quarter, related to a legacy community bank agricultural relationship. Revenue also benefited from the receipt of $3.5 million from a portion of the company's liquidation insurance claims of unearned premiums on the ReliaMax estate related to our student loan portfolio. In June 2018, we announced that we received written notification of the ReliaMax insolvency and that we expected to recover a portion of the unearned premiums. We generated net interest income of $66 million, an increase of 2 percent for the first fiscal quarter of 2021, compared to the same quarter of fiscal 2020. Net interest income benefited from a reduction in total interest expense related to lower deposit and funding costs. Cost of funds for the first quarter of 2021 average just 15 basis points. Fee income represented 49 percent of total revenue for the 12 months ended December 31, an improvement from 45 percent for the prior year 12-month period. We continue to see a robust pipeline of fee income opportunities within our payments division and our expanding banking as a service capabilities. We expect fee income to continue to be a greater percentage of revenue over time. Non-interest expense was $72.6 million for the first fiscal quarter of 2021, a decrease of 4 percent compared to the prior year. We remain disciplined on expense management as is evidenced by our efficiency ratio of 62.2 percent for the last 12 months and in December 31. an improvement of over 600 basis points compared to the prior year. We continue to focus on achieving our key long-term efficiency goals by driving optimization and utilization of existing business platforms and leveraging technology to help drive future efficiencies. Overall net income for the quarter was $28 million, or 84 cents per share, an increase of 33% and 50% respectively compared to last year's first quarter. Total assets at December 31 were $7.26 billion, an increase of 18% year-over-year and 19% compared to the linked quarter. The increase is due to the higher level of cash on the balance sheet related to a seasonal increase in deposits as well as unspent funds from the first and second round of economic impact payments. Deposits in the first quarter also benefited from the $150 million in deposits from the Emerald prepaid MasterCard program, which were moved to MetaBank as a component of the broader H&R Block relationship that began in the first quarter. As Brad mentioned, we were selected again to disperse a portion of the EIP payments to eligible recipients via bank-issued prepaid debit cards as part of the second round of stimulus, with initial payments having begun in early January. While the EIP program is anticipated to have a slightly positive impact on earnings, the balance sheet impact will be significant due to the large amount of cash on deposit balances during our fiscal second quarter resulting in a significant but temporary reduction of net interest income, return on average assets, and the company's leverage capital ratios until funds are spent by consumers. We do not expect these conditions will be sustained long-term and do not expect any material impact on our risk-based capital ratios. As a result of participating in this program, we expect to remain in good standing with regulatory agencies and will not be deemed as undercapitalized and will not be under any regulatory restrictions. As you may recall, we reinstated our share repurchase program last quarter. During the quarter, we repurchased just over 1.8 million shares at an average price of $29.46. Since quarter end through January 20th, we purchased an additional 300,000 shares. Under our authorized share repurchase program, which is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2022, we have approximately 2 million shares remaining. We will continue to consider further share repurchase activity within the context of our overall capital deployment strategies, including funding growth initiatives and returning excess capital to shareholders. Finally, we adopted CECL effective October 1, 2020, and its day one entry to increase the allowance for credit losses was $12.8 million in line with expectations. Allowance for credit losses was $72.4 million at December 31. The increase in the allowance when compared to the linked quarter was largely due to the adoption of the CECL accounting standard. That concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, please open the line for questions.
spk01: Ladies and gentlemen, if you'd like to ask a question at this time, please press the star and the number one key on your touchtone telephone. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. Our first question comes from Steve Moss with B Reilly Securities.
spk06: Good afternoon. Just want to start off maybe on, hey Brad, just want to start off maybe on loan yields here. You know, pretty steady loan yields for commercial finance business. Kind of curious, how the pricing environment is there, and just the activity you're seeing.
spk07: Yeah, this is Brett. I'll jump in here. Obviously, rates are moving down, and our assets have a fairly short duration. So, we're feeling some price pressure, but just remember the kind of assets that we go after tend to have a higher yield. So, yeah, there's some price pressure. There's a lot of liquidity in the market. We're not chasing a down market, but we're still holding our own pretty well.
spk06: Okay. And then with regard to expenses here for the upcoming quarter, obviously, you know, big quarter for tax, just kind of curious as to how we think about total expenses in the upcoming quarter.
spk05: Hey, Steve, this is Glenn. Yeah. As always, the, our fiscal second quarter of the March quarter is our highest expenses. Um, you know, part, a lot of those expenses though, above our run rate are variable in nature. So it depends on, on the volume of tax season as well. But, um, so, you know, they could go to 95, a hundred million dollars, but where it settles in at will also, um, correlate with, uh, revenues. Okay.
spk06: That's helpful. And just one last question for me here on fee income. You guys talked about it becoming a greater percentage of revenue as the year goes on. Just wondering if you could expand on on that and how you're thinking about that percentage growing throughout the year.
spk09: Well, we have announced several times about our faster payments initiatives and our acquiring business that we entered into during the last year, which is starting to ramp up as well. So we have a number of those kinds of transaction-related businesses that we've gotten into that will be ramping up over the next couple of years, and that will be increasing our fee income. Now, if interest rates go up again and interest income goes up along with it, you know, those ratios could be more or less depending on those factors. But if interest rates stay the same and our portfolio kind of hangs in where it is, then I think you'll see an ever-increasing percentage of fee income over time. All right.
spk06: Well, thank you very much for that good quarter. You bet. Thanks, Steve.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Michael Perito with KBW.
spk03: Hey, good afternoon, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Hey, Mike. You bet. I had kind of a conceptual question. Brad, you mentioned some of the ESG and financial inclusion themes that are kind of driving the meta process. strategy, you know, and frankly have been for years, right, but formalizing some of those processes and whatnot. But I guess as we think about the prepaid card business, you know, it's hard to not look at some of the other, you know, you put on the slide deck the neobanks or digital challenger banks or things of that nature, you know, kind of going after the same part of the pie here. And I'm curious if you have any kind of longer-term views about the growth rate and viability of the prepaid business, that there's more digital disruption from banking alternatives elsewhere. And I guess, as we think about specifically to Meta, I mean, is it fair to think that, you know, with your representation on both sides, that you don't really expect much of an overall impact to kind of how your business grows? Or do you think there's room for growth rates to kind of shift as, you know, time evolves?
spk09: The neobanks generally don't have a banking charter, and they partner with other banks in order to implement those programs. That's really what we do is support those guys. Brett highlighted Money Lion and the Roar Money product, which is a checking account product. So, you know, that's an example of us, you know, facilitating those kinds of opportunities in addition to prepaid. So I don't think we're just pigeonholed in prepaid, first of all. Secondly, I think prepaid is a broad category. There are a lot of niche applications of prepaid. And if you think about, you know, the rebate cards, the loyalty and promotion cards, the gift cards, you know, how it's used for, you know, certain other categories like FSA products and benefits and things like that. There are a lot of niche categories that will continue to grow in prepaid. And then finally, even within some of the prepaid reloadable categories, they are still operating very strong, and we're seeing growth in a number of those programs, but also the payroll card programs, which are beneficial to employers. So There are lots of opportunities within prepaid. There's lots of opportunity for us with the neobanks and the fintechs that are out there for us to support their programs and partner with them. And I think the industry and the category is very broad, so have no concerns about competitive pressures at this time.
spk03: That's very helpful. And, you know, I think, you know, last I checked, there's maybe a couple dozen of banks that one way or another are kind of in this, you know, embedded finance or banking as a service arena. I mean, have you noticed any change in the competitive landscape as far as kind of the amount of other banks looking at deals you're looking at, or has it been relatively steady for you guys? And, you know, I know you've been doing it for a long time, but just curious if that competition has has really noticeably changed at all over the last 12 to 24 months.
spk09: I'm not seeing any competition noticeably change in the last 12 to 24 months. In fact, I've seen opportunities increasing in all categories.
spk03: Right. I also wanted to talk about the capital. I saw in the release that you guys are getting some temporary relief because of the EIP and the impact on capital. I was just curious if you could comment if at all, if any, that there's an impact on kind of your appetite near term for share purchases. And is it fair to think that either way, you know, coming into tax season here when the balance sheet's typically, you know, a bit more levered, that buybacks are likely, you know, not going to be quite as robust near term, but, you know, longer term we should still view them as a piece of your capital deployment strategy?
spk09: Glenn, you want to take that?
spk05: Yeah, you know, again, we talked about keeping our balance sheet outside of the temporary EIP impact, keeping a balance sheet in that $6 billion, $6.5 billion range for quite some period of time. And the returns we expect to generate, we're going to generate a lot of excess capital. And, you know, we'll look at all those options, but certainly share repurchases will be a part of that.
spk03: Okay. Excellent. Thank you, guys. I appreciate it.
spk09: Yep. Thank you. Thanks, Mike.
spk01: As a reminder, ladies and gentlemen, that is star then one to ask a question. Our next question comes from the line of Frank Chiraldi with Piper Sandler.
spk08: Hey, guys. Good afternoon. I just wondered if you could give any color or thoughts on the tax season so far, especially given just how unique the environment is and things like greater flexibility in the earned income tax credit in terms of filers using either 19 or 20 income. And I would imagine overall that would increase payout and more potential for refund advances. But any thoughts there you could offer?
spk09: Brett, do you want to start with that?
spk07: Yeah, so, you know, we enter every tax season with a set of, you know, very experienced people. We're probably more prepared for this season than we ever have. And just as you go through it, it seems like every season has its unique attributes. So I don't know that, you know, we can predict in any way, but we're well prepared for whatever it's going to entail.
spk08: Okay, so no change to thinking on or previous guidance on expectations on that front at this point?
spk09: I think the industry overall actually, you know, thinks that there'll be some delay. You know, the IRS deferred the start of the tax season and the processing, so I think we'll see some delay, but I think the industry overall thinks it'll be pretty consistent yet. That's to be seen. We won't know until we get into the season and start to see how people are reacting to all these changes.
spk08: Okay, thanks. And then I wonder if you could just talk about the continued reduction in the community banking book. And I would imagine the stuff that's moved off the book has been, you know, maybe in lower risk categories, but also the opportunity to maybe sell some stuff out from the higher risk categories given significant reserves you've taken against it.
spk05: Hi, Frank. It's Glenn. I wouldn't necessarily classify it as lower risk stuff. All the loans have been sold to central bank thus far or refied away. And so central banks working through the relationships that they want and to prioritize long-term as they have capacity on their balance sheet. Now, clearly, they're being very cautious about the hospitality and the theater loans we have. But it's not a – we're not necessarily beyond that left with an adverse selection. And, yeah, that portfolio will eventually get to zero one way or the other. But right now we feel good about – The loans that we do have on our balance sheet and those that we're watching closely, we feel good about the reserve levels that we have against them.
spk08: Yeah, on reserves, I know you talked about the specific reserve against the movie theater relationship that went into not accrual. And I know you give the reserves the total community banking book. Do you give the reserves against the movie theater and hotel book in total? I don't know if I missed that.
spk05: Well, the theaters are reserved at approximately 50%, and I don't know. We haven't provided the hospitality loans.
spk08: Gotcha. Okay, and if I could just sneak in one final one. In terms of the strength, the solar business, you know, any expectation or change to expectation on the tax rate for the year?
spk05: Yeah, the solar pipeline is strong. We also believe our taxable earnings pipeline is strong, and so low double-digit tax rate is what we're thinking today. As Brad mentioned, a lot of our annual results, including amount of taxable income, will depend on how well tax season goes. Okay. Thank you.
spk08: Thanks, Frank.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from William Wallace with Raymond James.
spk04: Good evening. Thanks for taking my call. I'm wondering if you could just kind of help us think about how you might think your reserve to loan ratio might move under CECL as the year progresses. under the expectation that we start to get greater visibility into an economic recovery and not, you know, we don't start to turn the other way? Sure.
spk05: Sure. Yeah. So we, assuming the economy improves or doesn't get worse from here, plateaus and or starts improving later in the year, then we would expect our allowance to come down. Okay. Okay. Now, as a percentage, as a qualitative allowance, as we reshift our balance sheet, our earning assets into more loans and fewer securities, the absolute allowance will depend on the mix of loans versus securities. But on a qualitative basis, we would expect if there's an improved economy, and we're past the health crisis, by the end of the year, we would expect lower allowance ratios.
spk04: Okay. All right. Thank you. If I look at some of the niche commercial lending businesses, a couple of them have seen some nice bounce back in growth here in the last quarter or two. I wonder if you could talk a little bit about what you're seeing in the commercial commercial lending business and what your expectations for growth might be at this point.
spk07: Yeah, this is Brett. So we've kind of talked about this before. During a time of economic stress, some of the commercial borrowers are either run out of or have too much trouble with their traditional lenders. and they moved to more of a working capital line arrangement. So we've been the beneficiary of some growth in some nice transactions in asset-based lending and factoring that has come back. Also, I mean, if you just kind of look at the pure numbers, you know, when COVID hit and also with the PPP payments that occurred for our clients, many of the same client borrowings dropped earlier. So some of that has come back quite a bit. So That's really where you're seeing some good growth in those arenas, and we would expect that. As we look forward, and as I mentioned in my comments, depending on how many of our clients get the second round of PPP loans, we may see some softness there for a short period of time. But as the economy comes back and we have a pretty good pipeline, we should be able to build those asset classes more.
spk04: Okay. All right. Thanks. And that's actually a good segue to – Another question I had, which was regarding the second round of PPP with the portal now open just about a week. Where are you in applications so far, and maybe what are your expectations for what the volume might end up with this round? Let's go around.
spk07: Yeah, it would seem not to help me if we'd actually disclose anything, but what I would tell you is that there are some tests to get into the second round, the most material of which is a 25% drop in revenue rate. over a linked quarter, and many of our clients are not able to meet that test. So that's sort of good news, bad news. But I would say that at least at this point, the volume would be off from what it was the first round.
spk04: Okay, not willing to maybe quantify that. It seems like from a lot of the banks that have been reporting this, Some have suggested maybe as much as 50%, but others have thought that it could come in closer to 20%, 30%. Do you have a sense that maybe within that range or just not?
spk07: That 50% is a directionally correct number to kind of work with.
spk04: Okay. Okay. Thanks. And then just a housekeeping question as it relates to PPP. Can you give us either the net interest income impact or the net interest margin impact from from the program in the first quarter?
spk05: It's just a couple basis points from PPP. It's really our impact on that interest margin is far outweighed by the impacts of these EIP deposits.
spk04: Yeah. Yeah, and so that's actually – I'm I'm looking at my model and thinking that trying to forecast that net interest margin might be a meaningless exercise with all of the noise.
spk05: Maybe it's going, yeah, NIM is going to be noisy throughout the rest of 2021. And so, you know, a cleaner way is just probably to start with with the loan balances and where those go and the securities balances and build from there, we're going to hold a big chunk of the EIP direct stimulus in cash. So that's going to be sitting there just earning 10 basis points.
spk04: I'm wondering, you know, now the rate of decline in the first round of EIP has slowed pretty dramatically here in the last, it looks like, you know, three to six months, and what's the decision matrix as to whether or not it makes sense to take some of that cash and move it into the bond portfolio, you know, maybe ladder it or keep it all short and pick up a few extra dollars in interest income if you have to keep it? How are you thinking about that?
spk05: A number of, yeah, a number of factors in there, Wally. You know, a lot of the A lot of deposits that you see hanging around from the first stimulus last spring are still cards that have been unactivated. And so we continue discussions with our partners on that program. You know, when the plan was rushed out, I don't think Congress ever anticipated that folks wouldn't actually take the money and use it. So those discussions continue and as well as some of our regulatory waivers on leverage ratios call for us to keep that in cash, which is why our risk-based ratios aren't moving. That said, we do have excess liquidity. We're looking at options and securities and other ways to use that powder. That being said, we also don't want to lock in too much interest rate risk, but we'll deploy some of it.
spk09: Okay. Alex, I would just state that the unactivated cards are still activating from last May's release of cards, so we're still seeing some activations on a daily basis, albeit small, and at some point, if that you know, slows down or stops altogether, one of the considerations is that money, if it never does get accepted, we don't get it. We have to give it back to the government. So we don't want to tie that up, you know, too long term.
spk04: Understood. Yeah. Thank you. That's all I have. I appreciate your time. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you. And that concludes the Meta Financial Group first quarter fiscal year 2021 investor conference call. Thank you.
Disclaimer

This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

-

-