Cibus, Inc.

Good afternoon and welcome to the CBIS 1Q25 earnings call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please also note, today's event is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Carlo Bruce, Interim Chief Financial Officer. Sir, please go ahead.

Thank you and good afternoon. I would like to thank you for taking time to join us for CBIS 1Q25 Financial Results and Business Update Conference Call and webcast. Presenting with me today is Peter Beetham, co-founder, Interim Chief Executive Officer, President, and COO. Greg Gochel, our Chief Scientific Officer, will also be on today's call for participation during the Q&A session. Before we begin the call, I'd like to remind everyone that statements made on the call and webcast, including those regarding future financial results and future operational goals and industry prospects, are forward-looking and may be subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the call. Please refer to CBIS SAC filings for a list of associated risks. This conference call is being webcast. The webcast link, along with our press release and corporate presentation, are available on the investor relations section of cbs.com to assist you in your analysis of our business. And with that, I would now like to turn the call over to you, Peter.

Thanks, Carlo, and good afternoon, everyone. We believe the first quarter of 2025 continues to demonstrate clear validation of our commercial strategy and the transformative potential of our RTDS technology platform. Our first quarter press releases have confirmed our ability to deliver time-bound and predictable results. This, alongside what has been favorable regulatory decisions, is resonating across multiple fronts, expanding and attracting commercial interest from some of our current customers, while also attracting many new prospective partners. CBIS is uniquely positioned at an important inflection point in the agricultural industry. Our proprietary RTDS gene editing process has established a new paradigm for trait development. One that is time-bound and predictable, enabling us to edit a customer's elite germplasm and return it with specific traits in under 12 months. This standardized platform is being recognized as a fundamental breakthrough that intersects with agriculture's important plant breeding programs. These programs are the engine room of genetic innovation for the seed industry. We believe this is unlike anything agriculture has seen before, creating a dependable model for trait development and commercialization for gene editing that's resonating strongly with our customers, partners, and more broadly, across the whole industry. What's particularly encouraging is how our time-bound and predictable message is attracting significant new interest in development projects, especially in disease resistance traits. We continue to show great progress with confirmed edits for different modes of action in the disease trait category that is unique and highly valuable for multiple crops in global markets. This validation from the market affirms our strategic direction and the value proposition of our technology as we focus on achieving our key milestones for 2025. Let me start with rice. Throughout 2024, we established a strong foundation in our rice platform, securing agreements with four major rice seed companies representing approximately 40% of our estimated accessible rice acres across North and Latin America. The momentum continues to build as we advance toward commercialization. This momentum is carried forward from last year's field trials, where we achieved a milestone with field trial results for stacked gene-edited herbicide tolerance traits in rice. This year in March, we expanded this opportunity for additional stacked HT traits in rice where trials are planned for the 2025 season. Last year's trials represent the first known trial using stacked gene-edited herbicide tolerance traits in rice for improved weed management. A huge breakthrough that further differentiates our offering and stands to bring significant value to farmers. This is of particular importance given the global need for weed management solutions that enable rice farmers to manage these challenges more efficiently. We are working hard to advance partnerships to do just that. A great example of our efforts is our strategic collaboration with RTGD Corporation Limited and Albar LLC to provide the herbicide clefidum as part of our weed management solution for U.S. rice farmers using the HT3 trait as a means to further our commercialization strategy. With our registrations lining up, we remain on track for our anticipated 2027 commercial launch. The momentum we're seeing in Latin America is particularly exciting as these markets have historically lacked access to advanced weed management solutions in rice. This represents a transformative opportunity both for farmers in these regions and for farmers in the region. This is a great opportunity to see the market as an innovator that is helping deliver value-added solutions to the market. We also expect to initiate our first trait validation trials in Latin America later this year with delivery of initial traits to a Latin American customer anticipated by year end. The broader message here is clear. Our rice commercialization strategy is progressing according to plan. We've traced integrated into multiple customers' germplasm that is adapted to diverse geographies. This represents a significant market opportunity to see as we approach commercialization. So now turning to our disease resistance work. Disease, in our case, sclerotinia or white mold. This program continues to be a standout area of our progress, building on our breakthrough achievements in 2024 where we successfully completed edits in Canola for four different modes of action for sclerotinia resistance and observed positive field trial results for our second mode of action. We've continued to advance this critical platform. In March 2025, we announced positive greenhouse data for Canola plants containing a third mode of action for sclerotinia resistance. This represents a significant milestone in our multi-layered approach to create durable disease resistance, very similar to how antiviral cocktails create lasting protection against diseases in humans like HIV. Our sclerotinia resistance trait in Canola now offers multiple modes of action to provide durable resistance and enable farmers to improve yields and lower input costs by reducing their reliance on fungicides. This is particularly critical as sclerotinia or white mold is a fungal pathogen that causes significant disease in oilseed crops and most legumes, reducing Canola yields by 7 to 15 percent with individual plant level yield losses being as great as 50 percent per infection. We're now preparing to conduct field trials for our third and fourth modes of action in Canola in North America this summer, along with testing our first stacked disease resistance trait in controlled environment growth chambers. So let me now turn to the soybean platform. Our soybean platform reached a significant milestone in January when we successfully edited a soybean cell for our HC2 trait, achieving editing rates to enable expanded platform development. This achievement represents a critical step forward in our soybean strategy and positions us to continue pursuing both the HC2 trait and white mold resistance in soybeans, potentially accessing a substantial market estimated at 125 million accessible acres with annual trait royalties per acre potentially in the range of 10 to 15 dollars. While we continue to work diligently toward a fully operational soybean platform, the success achieved early in the year validates our approach and technical capabilities. We expect to achieve HC2 edits in soybean plants later this year, building upon our successful cell edits from earlier this year. The company continues to work diligently toward a fully operational soybean platform. Soybean gene editing of complex traits like white mold resistance remains an area of significant commercial interest, and we continue to advance discussions with current and prospective partners who recognize the value of our time-bound and predictable approach to trait development. Which now brings me to our sustainable ingredients program. Within our sustainable ingredients program, we've advanced our biobased fermentation biofragrance products and now anticipate entering into commercialization agreements with consumer packaged goods partners this year. This quarter, we successfully completed the first stage scalar of two biofragrance products. This important advance affirms our expectations in realizing nominal revenues from this program later in 2025. In addition, our partner funded project with a large multinational CPG company also continues to progress well. This work leverages our core crop gene editing capabilities to develop sustainable low carbon ingredients, helping major global companies advance their sustainability objectives. So let's turn to regulatory. On the regulatory front, we achieved several historic milestones this quarter that strengthen our commercialization pathway. In February, the California Rice Commission's Rice Certification Committee approved our field research proposal, marking the first authorization for planting gene edited rice in California. Additionally, on March 14th this year, EU member states endorsed the EU Council's negotiating mandate on the regulation of plants obtained by new genomic techniques or NGTs, enabling a three-way or tri-log discussions with the EU Parliament, EU Commission and EU Council to finalize legislation. In April 2025, the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock in Ecuador determined that SEBIS' AC1 and AC3 rice traits are equivalent to those developed through conventional breeding. This was a really important determination for our RTDS technologies as Ecuador strictly prohibits the commercial planting of transgenic or GMO crops. This determination confirms rice plants containing SEBIS' AC1 and AC3 traits may proceed with registration and commercialization in Ecuador in accordance with the provisions of the Organic Law of Agro-Biodiversity, SEEDS and Promotion of Sustainable Agriculture and its Regulations, known as LOASFAS. And just two weeks ago, we were excited to announce that the USDA APHIS has designated two of our disease resistance trait products under development for canola as not regulated. This favorable designation confirms that our traits do not meet the definition of a regulated article, enabling us to proceed with product development without restrictions associated with regulated articles in the US. This USDA designation is especially significant as it further validates our RTDS technology platform that enables targeted genetic changes without integrating recombinant DNA. The US has long been a leader in regulatory modernization and this designation represents yet another example of how regulatory frameworks have evolved and continue to evolve to support the promise of gene editing technologies. These regulatory developments across multiple geographies significantly strengthen the commercial opportunity for our trait pipeline and serve as important catalysts for our crop trait development business. So now let's look ahead to 2025. We have several important milestones we're focused on while simultaneously optimizing our operations. Expansion of commercial relationships with life-threat companies across North and South America. First trait validation trials in Latin America with delivery of initial traits to customers by year-end. Field trials for serotonin resistance in canola for third and fourth modes of action and trials of our first stacked disease resistance trait in controlled environment growth changes. Initial field trial data for our HT2 trait in canola. Continued development toward an operational soybean platform and advancement of our biofragments work with expected nominal revenues later this year. As we pursue these strategic priorities, we're laser focused on optimizing our operations and significantly reducing our cash burn rate in 2025. We're taking a disciplined approach to resource allocation, prioritizing investments in near-term commercial opportunities with developed and advanced traits. While ensuring we have the financial flexibility to execute on our strategic priorities and extend our runway. This balanced approach to growth and fiscal discipline positions us to maximize shareholder value as we approach key commercial milestones. Our gene editing technologies and focus on productivity traits hold great promise for the future of farming, enabling crops to be more adaptable to a changing environment and the changing demands of a global food supply chain. As demonstrated by our progress this quarter and over the past year, the opportunities for our gene edited traits aren't in the distant future, they're materializing and expanding now. With our traits moving into customer germplasm, showing promising results in field trials and a more harmonized global regulatory environment emerging for gene edited traits, we are uniquely positioned within the agricultural gene editing industry to capture significant value for our shareholders. And with that, I'll hand over the call to Carlo for a financial update. Carlo?

Thank you Peter. Looking at our financials for the first quarter, cash and cash equivalents were 23.6 million as of March 31, 2025. Taking into account the 21.4 million net proceeds received in 2025 from the registered direct offering in January, the impact of implemented cost saving initiatives and without giving effect to potential financing transactions that CBIS is pursuing, CBIS expects that existing cash and cash equivalents is sufficient to fund planned operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into the third quarter of 2025. Moving to our income statements. Revenue for the first quarter of 2025 was 1 million, an increase of 489,000 compared to the 545,000 in the year ago period due to increased activity in partner funded projects. R&D expense was 11.8 million for the first quarter of 2025 compared to 12 million in the year ago period. The decrease is primarily due to cost reduction initiatives. As GNA expense was 9.9 million for the first quarter of 2025 compared to 7 million in the year ago period. The increase is primarily due to a 3 million litigation accrual, partially offset by a decrease related to cost reduction initiatives. Net loss was 49.4 million for the first quarter of 2025 compared to net loss of 27 million in the year ago period. The increase in net loss was primarily due to the 21 million non-cash neutral impairment that was recorded in the first quarter of 2025 compared to no such charge in the prior year period. Net loss excluding this good will impairment was 28.4 million. For additional details about the financials for the first quarter of 2025, please refer to our press release and filings with the SEC. That concludes our financial discussion. Peter, now back to you for your closing remarks.

Thank you, Carlo. The first quarter of 2025 has demonstrated clear validation of our commercial strategy and the transformative potential of our RTDS technology platform. As I've mentioned, our time-bound and predictable approach to trade development is resonating strongly with customers and partners, attracting significant commercial interest across our rice, canola and soybean platforms, where we believe we will garner further development and program support. This is with regulatory progress advancing globally, including the favorable USDA APIS designation of our canola disease resistance traits just two weeks ago. Our rice traits moving into customer germplasm and our disease resistance program showing remarkable results with multiple modes of action, we're positioned at an important inflection point where seed genetics is now offering broad innovation in global seed markets. As we remain laser focused on optimizing operations and reducing cash burn in 2025 through 2026, we continue to advance our highest value commercial opportunities that will drive long-term shareholder value. And with that, I thank you for your attention and interest. We look forward to updating you on our continued progress next quarter. This concludes our remarks, operator. Could you open the call for questions? Thank you.

Certainly. At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press the star and one on your telephone keypad. You may withdraw yourself from the queue at any time by pressing star two. And once again, that is star and one. We'll move first to Lawrence Alexander with Jeffreys. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. I guess three, three or four things, if I may. First, can you just walk through the cash burn and the step up in the SGA and Q1? You know, kind of what your views on both of those and how to think about them for the balance of the year?

Thanks. Thanks, Lawrence. I'm going to hand that to Carlo to answer. Thank you.

Yeah. Thank you, Peter. So good question. The cash burn quarter one, as we have said in the previous presentations, following an executed rip last year, we went seriously down. So we are now around 4.4 million gross. So that was successfully planned and executed. What you see in quarter one in the SGA is an accrual for litigation we took. And that's why the number is higher compared to the quarter in previous periods. But when you really from a cash perspective, look at it, we went down.

OK, perfect. And then on the on the EU regulatory discussions, have your contacts in Europe given you any sense for what a reasonable time frame would be for the three way discussions to coalesce on a final tax?

So thanks, Lawrence. Let me expand on that a little bit, because I think, as I mentioned, this was a result of the EU Council vote in March is really a historic thing for gene editing industry in general. And we're so excited about that because finally gene editing is being recognized as what they call conventional like. So it's essentially indistinguishable from what occurs in nature or from plant breeding programs. And, you know, as you go through this process, the parliament last year actually tabled the text, confirmed that the text wouldn't change. And then when they went through the amendments, it goes to the EU Council vote, which was positive in March. From that time now, they've entered into what they call the trial of which is three way discussions with Parliament, the Commission and the Council in the EU. And, you know, just as recent as yesterday, we heard that they have scheduled many meetings between now and the end of June to complete that trial. And what that means is they're heading to a final text. Now, that could be delayed, but it will happen, we believe, within six months. And the beauty of that is within the 12 months after that, you'll have the secondary legislation to move forward with gene editor products, both for cultivation and trade in with the EU, which, again, as we talked in some of our earlier remarks around regulatory, is harmonizing around the world. So, as you'll see from our press release, there's a number of items devoted to regulatory because we're seeing a great harmonizing and therefore a clear path for us to go on commercialization. Great. And then,

sorry, go ahead.

No, I was just making sure that I answered your question.

Yep. No, no. Great. And then just can you just walk through two last pieces? One is for when your trade products hit commercial launch. What is the working capital or cash flow impacts ahead of booking incoming cash flow from your customers? And secondly, for biofragrance, can you give some sense of the potential scale? How fast it could ramp what the customers are telling you and if they do get what they want and they're enthusiastic about your result, your product, what the impact will be on your working capital needs and need to have the right sort of technical support and quality assurance staff to support them?

So, let me start with the first part of your question. So, thank you, Lawrence. I think that, you know, as we as we go forward on our traits, particularly in rice, we're really excited about rice. It is one of our strategic priorities that we've been very much focused on over the last couple of years, and we've had great demand and success around the two herbicide tolerant traits in rice, including, you know, a really favorable result from the Ecuador regulatory just recently. So, you know, the handoff point with materials once they're edited in rice, we don't we don't effectively have a big hit on our cash at all. We support our customers from a stewardship standpoint, making sure that the traits are handled correctly, that there's some genotyping and some. You know, eventually we will allow them to come back to us in their breeding program to do some genotyping, but it's not a big hit at all. So that's the first part of your question. And then the second part was with regard to biofragments, biofragments. What we're hearing from prospective partners on this is there's a great demand and the ramp can be very quick because it's a fermentation plant. So, as we've mentioned, we've got nominal revenues here in twenty five building in twenty six. You know, what's interesting about this area is it really is companies looking for bio based products. So they're very excited about the opportunity for us to provide fragrances that they have had to source through either a very expensive natural process or synthetics. And it's mainly been synthetics. And so we see the ramp could go really quickly in this area over the twenty six to twenty eight years. Thank you. You guys need to add.

Yeah, just just to add our our approach with the biofragments is is unique to us. And we've demonstrated with the first two molecules, the success and the interest in this in this platform. And we're accepting that that's going to generate future interests from a variety of customers.

And if I may weigh in just a few seconds, Lawrence, I come from seed companies and the beauty of this of this business, of this royalty business, is that the inventory built is done by your partners, by the seed companies and not by CBIS. And I love that piece or that working capital requirement is not with us. It's with them.

Okay, great. Okay. Thank you very much. Thanks, Lawrence.

We'll move next to Austin Moller with Canaccord. Your line is open.

Hi, good afternoon. What do you expect to see during fourth mode of action field trials and canola in the second quarter? And what would be a favorable result in your view?

So, thanks, Austin. Of course, I'm going to let Greg answer this one. Thank you. Yeah,

thanks, Austin. And good afternoon. We're the our approach with with sclerotinia resistance, specifically with multiple modes of action is to address multiple ways that the pathogen is interacting with with the plant. And so the fourth mode of action is specifically addresses one of the ways that the pathogen interacts with the plant. And our expectation is one that the field trials success in the field trials demonstrate that control material is infected by the pathogen. And that the edited material is more resistant than what we see in that control material. That would lead us then to going the next step in terms of combining that mode of action with other modes of action that are showing similar efficacy. At this point, what we've discussed for mode of action to, but also encouraging results that we've seen in controlled environments for mode

of action three already.

Okay, and just to follow up on the sustainable ingredients opportunity with the with the large goods customer, are you able to indicate whether you expect the revenues to start from that either in twenty five or twenty six or has that changed from what you had said in the prior quarter?

Thanks, Austin. No, the we continue to see media milestones. The scale up went well on the sustainable greens with the bio based fermentation fragrance. And we do see things on track for twenty five later this year nominally and then orders and Q4. So heading into twenty six. So we're still on track on that. In fact, everything has gone very well on that process. I think the what what's exciting about this area is that I can't not stress the framework around where we're working in the industry of gene editing right now because of the regulatory framework and people. Recognizing products from that thing so favorably sustainable ingredients. No other activity is in crop based products instead sustainable greens. And that is a huge opportunity for us and it continues to grow. We continue to get a lot of interest inbound interest from companies. And this goes back to some of my earlier comments and the fact that where we've been over to develop systems for editing in in crops like rice and canola. And when we're bringing soybean on stream, there's time bound and predictable. You know, it really has triggered a lot of interest because being able to return edited plants back to prospective customers within twelve months really changes the whole paradigm of what you do and how you integrate that into plant breeding programs. So when you think about some novel sustainable ingredients, our productivity traits that we're developing with the herbicide tolerance as well as our disease work, you can see we've made a lot of progress very quickly with our canola work in the mode of actions that Greg just explained with regard to disease resistance. So, you know, I've expanded a little bit there to give you a good idea of why sustainable ingredients we see is a big part of our future business.

Excellent. Thanks for the deep dive there. I appreciate it.

We'll take our next question from Samir Joshi with HC Wainwright. Your line is open.

Hey, good afternoon guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Just some of the questions on the same topics that have been discussed by other callers on the sustainable ingredients space. Is there, apart from customer testing, is there any other regulatory or other kind of testing that is required before you can start selling or it's just because the molecule is the same, the customer is the only one who is going to test it? Thanks

for the question, Samir. What we've been able to do over the last couple of years is really work pretty closely with prospective customers. And so they understand the active ingredient of the product already. So, what we've been excited by is the ability to scale quickly and maintain that quality. And so, to answer specifically to your question, that over the next few months, that will be tested within the hands of customers and they will look to see where the demand is. We know primarily that there is great demand and then the supply of managing that. And I think that the exciting part about this for us to see this is, you know, we are a royalty based company with regard to the business model. This does fit with the same business model, but does diversify things because this allows us to get some development programs to expand in this area. And, you know, what we've been able to do is work on a fermentation product that is scalable, but it is also easily to work through other opportunities. So we've started with two. There are, you know, over a dozen more opportunities in this space. And so, you know, diversifying our, you know, both with development programs and royalties allows us to sort of really broaden our portfolio.

Understood. On the European front, once the trial is done and all the regulations are in place, do you anticipate repeating any of the trials for that region or they will be for different, some of the different crops there? But just wanted to see if the same crops are to be used on or same traits are to be used on the same crops. You can just transfer the US tests onto there.

So, Samir, it's a really good question. As we've shared before, we've been running trials in the UK already. The one thing that is hot off the press just yesterday was that UK actually passed their secondary legislation. So that will make our trialing easier because we'll be putting in applications to broaden that later this year. The beauty of doing it in the UK is that we can use trialing and this will be our second year trialing in the UK with materials that adapted for European market conditions, but also the environmental conditions. So, you know, we've already sort of got a leapfrog on that with regards to a couple of years in the UK. And this is fairly standard. A lot of seed companies based in Europe often use the UK as a site for trialing. We believe that based on the EU's decision now that we could also start trialing next year in the EU. There have been trials already in Italy with rice that's been edited. So we're moving pretty quickly in that area as well.

Sounds good. It looks like you have already sort of a little bit of a hard start there. That's good to know. On the cost reduction front, I know the R&D costs have been reduced a bit and apart from this one time costs, your costs are expected to be lower this year. What kind of run rate are you expecting for the rest of the three quarters in terms of cash burn?

So let me start out. Thanks, Amit. It's an important question. We can always work on making sure that we resource the right programs and look at our cost reductions. I think we've done well over the last couple of years where we've essentially, just last October we've reduced it by 20%. We'd like to further that. We're seeing synergies within our organization and some consolidation of facilities activity. And I think that is going to help in the future. But that's something we're very much focused on. And I'll let Carlo expand on that. I'll be

specific on the burn for this year. So I always like to talk about the net burn. And what you see in quarter one is what you can almost project later in the year. So there we talk about a net burn of around 4 million. And opportunities to reduce that would sit in increased partner success. But that's where we are today.

Thanks a lot, Carlo. Thanks for taking my questions.

We'll take our last question from Matthew Venizia with AGP. Your line is open.

Hey guys, thanks for taking my questions. So to get into the regulatory approvals a little bit, you had the one come in from Ecuador. I was wondering if there are other Latin American countries that are rice producers. Do they have similar regulatory frameworks to Ecuador where it's kind of like an M.I. regulated situation? And then I have a couple more on top of that.

That's a great question, Matt. So thank you. You know, Ecuador is specifically a country that had said they do not accept strictly prohibits, was the word, for transgenic or GMO crops. So for us, it was one of the important Latin American countries to make sure that they understood what our products were and that they would be accepted as gene edited and or as conventional breeding. A lot of the other Latin American countries actually have looked to Ecuador as sort of a lightning rod for understanding the best way to go forward. So I think that has clearly opened up a really positive approach to the regulatory. And, you know, many of the other countries have already gone down that path. So Ecuador is the one that we wanted to make sure was clear. Yeah,

and just to add to that, Matthew, so you have a number of other countries in South America who already look at gene edited products as conventional breeding. So as for our canola business, for instance, we've been producing seed in the off season in Chile. But you also have sort of the same sort of confirmation in countries like Colombia,

Brazil and others.

Got it. Thank you. And then in terms of your rice products, I just wanted to ask if there's like, existent use of clessadam by rice farmers in the Latin American geography, or if it's kind of going to be like a de novo launch of the herbicide tolerance trait with the herbicide to farmers. Excellent

question, Matthew. So for tolerance to clessadam, clessadam is an approved herbicide in South America. And this is a, this trait enables resistance to that herbicide and clessadam is a grass herbicide. And the biggest challenges for rice growers are red rice or rice, weedy rice that's very related to the regular conventional rice. But also other grass weeds that are challenging, especially in South America

where you're in a very tropical environment.

Gotcha.

So it's an approved herbicide. And is there like usage data right now for, I guess, or like, maybe sales data that Alba has of how well clessadam does in the market currently?

Let me jump in there too and then I'll let Greg expand. But I think the clessadam on unedited rice will kill it.

So

it's used in other crops right now. And Alba have done a number of registrations in other geographies. But I think that where we're, the Latin American partners, we will be working with them going through the variety registration as well as the chemical registrations over the next 12 months.

Yeah, and Matthew just to add a little bit. So, as Peter said, you're using clessadam to manage to manage grass weeds, not in rice today, but with the trait that we're moving forward that provides an additional tool for rice farmers to use in the South American markets and globally in fact.

Got it. All right. Thank you guys for taking my questions.

My pleasure.

This does conclude the Q&A portion of today's call. I'd now like to turn it back to management for any additional or closing remarks.

So thank you everybody for today. I want to just stress that we do see this as an inflection point for the company. So many things have been moving in the right direction for us as a company on both the ability to provide edited products back to customers in a time-bound and predictable way. We also have that in the understanding that the regulatory agencies around the world are recognizing what we do and the outcomes of what we have from our procedures are seen as indistinguishable from what occurs in nature and intersect with plant breeding programs with the seed company partners that we've been working with for a number of years. So, you know, with those two key items, you know, it's been we're very proud to present opportunities in this marketplace. And as I said before, I think this whole industry is really recognizing the power of gene editing. And so providing traits that allow you as a farmer to be more productive on every acre to use less inputs, less chemistry is really good for the environment and for the impact on climate. But it's also most importantly for the farmer allows them to be more profitable. And this and at this stage and time, I think it's really important that farmers can access seeds that we provide throughout partners to be more profitable. So the other last thing I'd like to say and in closing is also just how proud I am of the team. Now, we're very fortunate that see this. We have a team that has been together for many years. So many of us have been involved in building to where we are today. I couldn't be prouder of working for and presenting this on behalf of that team. So thank you very much.

This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time and have a wonderful evening.