Clearside Biomedical, Inc.

I apologize but there will be a slight delay in today's conference. Please hold and the conference will resume shortly. Thank you for your patience.

Greetings and welcome to the Clearsight Biomedical Forequarter. and year-end financial results and corporate update conference call. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host, Jenny Cobin, Clearside Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us on the call today. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that during today's call, we will be making certain forward-looking statements. Various remarks that we make during this call and about the company's future expectations, plans, and prospects constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including those discussed in the risk factors section of our annual report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2019, our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020, and our other SEC filings available on our website. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent our views as of today and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so even if our views change. On today's call, we have George Levesque, our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Thomas Chula, our Chief Medical Officer and Chief Development Officer, and Charlie Degnan, our Chief Financial Officer. After our formal remarks, we will open the call for your questions. I would now like to turn the call over to George.

Thank you, Jenny. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us on the call today. 2020 was a year of progress for ClearSide, and we've continued this momentum into 2021. Despite the uncertainties brought on by the global pandemic, our internal team and our board of directors remained focused throughout the year, and we were able to successfully execute on our key initiatives. The broad applicability of our superchoroidal injection delivery technology continues to grow as our programs advance both internally and with our partners. To date, more than 1,200 injections have been performed in clinical trial patients using our novel SES microinjector, delivering multiple therapeutic products, small molecules, viral gene therapies, and virus-like drug conjugates. These injections have been performed in a number of different retinal diseases, including uveitis, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and choroidal melanoma. This extensive clinical experience reinforces our belief that the SES microinjector has the potential to be a reliable, non-surgical, office-based method to access the supracoroidal space for the treatment of a broad range of retinal diseases. In addition to our clinical injection experience, we have a comprehensive intellectual property portfolio that protects our novel SES microinjector, as well as the treatment of various conditions with supracoroidal administration of certain therapeutic products. We have 22 U.S. patents and more than 50 European and internationally issued patents. Our granted patents provide exclusivity for our delivery technology and product candidates into the mid-2030s, and if granted, our pending applications would extend exclusivity beyond 2040. We continually monitor the activity of competitors who have recently initiated development programs related to supercordial administration. Given our patent estate, and extensive clinical experience, we feel confident that we will be able to successfully protect and have our assets commercialized if they are approved and come to market. Now I'd like to discuss the specifics of our internal product pipeline, starting with Zypyr. Zypyr is our proprietary suspension of triamcinolone acinonide. a corticosteroid formulated for supracoroidal injection using our SCS microinjector for the treatment of macular edema associated with uveitis. We remain on track to resubmit our new drug application for Zypyr in the second quarter of 2021, which is in line with our prior guidance. We anticipate that the FDA will review the NDA within six months of the resubmission date. The NDA filing is supported by data from the Phase III Peachtree Clinical Trial that demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvement in vision for patients with macular edema associated with non-infectious uveitis. That improvement was achieved across all anatomical locations of uveitis. Also, in patients with active inflammation at baseline, resolution was achieved in more than two-thirds of those treated with Zypure across three commonly used measures of inflammation. vitreous haze, anterior chamber cells, and anterior chamber flare. Based on these data, we believe Zypure, administered superchoroidally, has the potential to be a novel treatment that improves the lives of patients suffering from macular edema associated with uveitis. Also for Zypure, we have two strong partners in Bausch & Lomb and Arctic Vision. Bausch & Lomb has the exclusive license for the commercialization and development of Zypure in the United States and Canada, and an exclusive license for Europe and the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand, South America and Mexico. Arctic Vision has the exclusive license for the commercialization and development of Zypyr in Greater China and South Korea and has announced the approval of their investigational new drug application for a Phase III clinical trial in China. We appreciate the continued support and input from our partners as we look forward to the potential U.S. marketing approval for Zypyr and the initiation of a Phase III trial in China before the end of this year. As we announced last week, we have completed patient dosing in the first cohort of OASIS, our Phase I-IIa clinical trial for CLS-AX in patients with wet AMD. CLS-AX is our proprietary suspension of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Excedinib for suprachoroidal injection. We believe CLS-AX can improve the treatment of wet AMD in three important ways. It may offer safety benefits by compartmentalizing drug away from the vitreous and the anterior segment. Second, it may improve efficacy by directly targeting affected chorio-retinal tissues with high drug levels. And third, it may reduce patient treatment burden due to prolonged durability of the small molecule suspensions in the suprachoroidal space, thereby reducing the frequency of injections. Our differentiated approach with approach with CLS-AX combines with the high potency and pan-VEGF attributes of Excedinib with superchoroidal delivery by our SCS microinjector to potentially deliver these benefits. OASIS is a US-based, open-label, single-dose escalation trial to assess the safety and tolerability of CLS-AX in wet AMD patients. Our continued progress on OASIS is important as we continue to expand our pipeline with new assets and indications and we look forward to reporting initial safety data from Cohort 1 by mid-year. With our CLS-AX OASIS clinical trial and the programs run by our strategic partners, there are currently four ongoing U.S.-based clinical trials with three different novel candidates administered into the suprachoroidal space using our proprietary SES microinjector. I will now turn over the call to Dr. Tom Chula, our chief medical officer and chief development officer. Tom will elaborate on our internal development pipeline featuring CLS-AX and our integrin inhibitor program. He will also provide an update of our partner's program with Regenexx Bio and Ora Biosciences. Tom?

Thank you, George. 2020 was a very productive year for us from a research and development perspective, and I'm excited to highlight some of these accomplishments for you today. We initiated our phase one to a clinical trial in WebAMD with CLSAX. And as we reported last week, we made progress in completing an enrollment in the first cohort. This achievement was made possible through the combined efforts and commitment from patients, investigators, advisors, and our internal team. The reception and interest in our program from the retina community has been amazing. Ultimately, we believe that CLSAX can improve the overall patient experience with the longer lasting treatment and a favorable tolerability profile. Over the course of the last year, our discovery and research team has also made meaningful progress. We are continually utilizing our capabilities to develop proprietary suspensions of various agents to utilize our SCS microinjector in diseases where we can make a difference in the lives of patients. Our preclinical work with our integrin inhibitor program is ongoing, and we expect to conclude these studies this year. Together with our partners, significant progress has been made in expanding the use of our FCS injection technology into the gene therapy space and into new diseases. Our partner, Regenexx Bio, is investigating the delivery of their gene therapy asset into the supracordial space in two indications. And our partner, Oriole Biosciences, has expanded the pipeline into the oncology space as they assess the supracordial delivery of their product candidate for chordal melanoma. The use of our SCS microinjector in these clinical trials allows us to broaden the reach of our technology and potentially treat more patients. We also made important progress within the medical community with over 35 presentations delivered over the last 14 months at the leading ophthalmology and retinal medical conferences. These presentations and ongoing interactions with the leaders in the field have increased the interest in the supracordial space and the potential to adopt this procedure into their practices when available. We believe that excitement about our technology is evidenced by the quick enrollment of our initial clinical trial in wet AMD. I will now delve into each of these topics a bit more. First, CLSA-X. CLSA-X combines a proprietary suspension of exitinib delivered via our SCS microinjector. We believe that there are several synergies for this approach to yield potential safety, efficacy, and durability benefits. First, let's discuss safety. Exitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, or TKI. Because it is a well-characterized small molecule instead of a novel, complex biologic, there is potential for less immune response and inflammation compared to some new contemporary biologic agents. Also, compared to other TKIs, Exitinib has shown better biocompatibility with ocular cells, including retinal pigment epithelial cells, which may potentially translate to safety benefits. Importantly, we believe that our unique route of SCS administration for CLSAX, which is compartmentalized to the site of disease, may minimize treatment-related adverse events such as vitreous floaters, snow globe, or corneal off-target effects seen with other TKI administration techniques. Second, with respect to efficacy, current anti-VEGF treatments target VEGFA, while Exitinib shows pan-VEGF inhibition through broad receptor blockade. There are preclinical and clinical studies that suggest that broad VEGF blockade may have advantages of a focused VEGF-A blockade. Furthermore, Exitinib has demonstrated more than 10 times the in vitro potency and more complete inhibition of preclinical angiogenesis compared to other TKIs being assessed for wet AMD. In addition, in preclinical models, Exitinib not only inhibited but also regressed neovascularization, which is clinically relevant. While it is not surprising that TKIs have shown biologic effect in wet AMD clinical trials and delivered systemically, topically, and individually, each of these routes of administration have been associated with off-target effects. Consequently, the issue with TKIs is likely one associated with delivery of the drug and not a result of the mechanism of action. In preclinical studies with R-CLS-CX suspension of Exitinib delivered via supracordial injection, we have shown up to 11 times higher drug levels in affected tissues versus individual administration of the same dose of exitinib. Therefore, supracordial delivery of CLSAX not only compartmentalizes therapy away from unaffected tissues for potential safety benefits, but also targets the affected corioretinal tissue layers for potential efficacy benefits. Third, with respect to durability, supracordial CLSAX has shown prolonged duration in preclinical pharmacokinetic studies. This could lead to longer-lasting, highly effective treatment that may reduce the number of treatments and visits required for patients to achieve optimal results. Our first CLSAX study is a Phase I-IIa clinical trial called OASIS, which is based in the United States. It is a multicenter, open-label trial in wet AMD patients. Because this is a first-in-human trial, our primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of CLSAX administered by supracordial injections. We will be dose escalating to determine the optimal dose to advance into Phase II testing, and we also have the capability to do an extension study as needed in later cohorts. As a reminder, our key inclusion criteria include active subphobial coronary vascularization secondary to AMD, two or more anti-VEGF treatments with a meaningful response in the four months preceding the screening visit, and specifics related to patient's best corrected visual acuity to ensure patient stability after anti-VEGF treatment. Patients are then assessed at weeks 4, 8, and 12. If needed, patients would be retreated with a Flibercept based on a loss from best measurement of 10 or more letters and best corrected visual acuity with associated exudation, or an increase in central subfield retinal thickness greater than 75 microns, or the presence of a vision-threatening hemorrhage due to their AMD. All of these are criteria typical for current trials. The primary endpoint for the trial was that the safety and tolerability of CLSAX for three months following its administration. Last week, we announced that our first cohort of patients is fully enrolled. Based on the trial design, each patient has received a Flibercept at their first visit and a single dose of a CLSAX at their second visit one month later. Overall, we're very pleased with the rapid progress we've made in enrolling patients. Compared to other individually delivered therapies, we believe SCS administration of CLSAX is attractively differentiated, potentially providing synergistic safety, efficacy, and durability benefits. We look forward to reporting initial safety data from cohort one of OASIS mid-year and continuing with cohort two at a higher dose in the second half of the year. With respect to our other research efforts, we continue to explore opportunities to expand our internal development pipeline through new molecules and disease applications. Over the course of last year, we advanced our integrin inhibitor program with a focus in the area of diabetic macular edema and macular degeneration, where specific integrins have been implicated in these diseases. Integrins are multifunctional cell adhesion molecules that regulate cell processes. and play a critical role in pathologic processes such as inflammation, angiogenesis, and fibrosis. Integrins also represent a novel target with limited competition, and we believe that given their unique mechanism of action, our proprietary suspension could serve as a primary therapy, an adjunctive therapy to anti-VEGF treatments, or as a secondary therapy in refractory cases. Similar to what we have demonstrated with our other small molecule suspensions, exitinib and triansinolone acetinide, We believe our supercoital delivery approach of an integrin inhibitor could provide targeting, compartmentalization, and durability advantages over other delivery approaches. Our preclinical studies are ongoing with our proprietary integrin inhibitor suspension to preliminary assess the ocular tolerability, distribution, and pharmacokinetics as we look to address the pathologic processes in AMD and diabetic macular edema. We expect to conclude these studies this year, and we look forward to reporting relevant data. Gene therapy remains an extremely promising approach to treat retinal diseases, particularly those that are inherited, and we believe that our SCS technology can enhance the benefits of this approach. We are excited about the advancements made by our partner, Regenexx Bio, and their gene therapy program utilizing our SCS microinjector. Regenexx Bio is currently conducting two Phase II clinical trials evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of supracordial delivery of their agent, RGX314. We are very encouraged by the Regenexx bio-clinical trials for two important reasons. First, office-based super-queryl administration potentially avoids the risks associated with pars panepotrectomy, retinotomy, and subretinal injection, especially in AMD and diabetic retinopathy patients. And second, the ability for physicians to treat patients in their offices could substantially increase patient access to care compared to the current model of referring patients to regional ocular gene therapy surgical treatment centers. The first trial, entitled Aviate, is targeting the treatment of patients with severe wet AMD who are responsive to anti-VEGF treatment. They have completed enrollment in the first cohort and expect interim efficacy data in Q3 2021. Eugenics Bio has reported that RGX314 has been well-tolerated to date in the Aviate trial. This is quite encouraging as they are not only using, as they are not using prophylactic steroid treatment in the trial, And the tolerance of super quarterly administered gene therapy in humans would represent an important sign of progress. Regenexx Bio has also begun enrollment in cohort two and expects enrollment completion for that cohort in the second quarter of this year. The second RGX 314 clinical trial is for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. This trial entitled Altitude is ongoing and initial data is expected in 2021. We are excited about this groundbreaking approach, and we look forward to the important safety signals from these first-in-man dose cohorts of a supracordially administered gene therapy. Our oncology partner, Oral Biosciences, continues to enroll their Phase II clinical trial evaluating their proprietary virus-like drug conjugate, AU011, delivered via our FCS microinjector into the supracordial space. The trial is assessing the safety and primary efficacy of AU011 in patients with choroidal melanoma, a rare and aggressive form of eye cancer that is the most common interocular cancer in adults. We look forward to continued progress from Aura, and we are encouraged by the potential for AU011 to treat this devastating disease and improve the lives of cancer patients. I will close today with a brief overview of our recent interactions with the retina physician community. Despite all of the meetings being held virtually over the last year, our medical affairs team continues to make meaningful connections at Congresses and through numerous publications. Most recently, we presented at the annual Macular Society meeting, as well as the Angiogenesis, Exudation, and Degeneration 2021 program. At Macular Society, leading retina physicians presented a wide variety of information on our programs, including presentations on CLSAX, Zypyr, and supracordial administration of small molecule and nanoparticle suspensions. Importantly, data was also presented on the safety of the supracordial injection procedure utilizing our SCS microinjector across three retinal disorders demonstrating the broad applicability of our injection platform. The angiogenesis presentation highlighted several of the key attributes of Exitinib and Clearsight supracordial delivery of the agent, including the ease of administration, as demonstrated in a video of a clinical trial patient undergoing the office-based supracortical delivery procedure. In addition to these medical meetings, we have also had multiple papers accepted for publication. In February of this year, the peer-reviewed British Journal of Ophthalmology published a paper on our Azalea clinical trial, which was an open-label, prospective, multi-center study evaluating the local and systemic safety of Zypair in subjects with non-infectious uveitis with and without macular edema. Azalea corroborates and augments a successful Phase III peach tree trial, in which Zypyr was observed to be well-tolerated over the 24-week period. And our Zypyr Phase III extension study, Magnolia, was also recently accepted for publication in the British Journal of Ophthalmology. In January of this year, in the online publication, Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, there was an in-depth analysis of the biomechanics of supracrytal drug delivery. This focus on how compartmentalizing therapies away from the unaffected tissues, along with fluid transport properties and formula customization for pharmacologic agents, may allow for a more tailored treatment of diseases affecting core retinal tissues. And finally, in December of 2020, there was a paper in Translational Vision Science and Technology regarding how supercoitally delivered DNA nanoparticles transfected retina and retinal pigment epithelium and choroid in rabbits. Links to these publications and presentations are available on our website in the science section. In closing, given our extensive experience with over 1,200 patient injections performed to date in a robust training program, we believe our SCS microinjector could be readily adopted in clinical practice. We look forward to continued progress in 2021 and updating you as the year unfolds. I will now turn the call over to our CFO, Charlie Degnan, to review our financial results. Charlie?

Thank you, Tom. Our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2020 were published this afternoon in our press release and are available on our website. Therefore, I will summarize our current financial status. Our cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2020, totaled approximately $17 million. This includes $6.9 million of funds raised in the fourth quarter through our at-the-market or ATM facility. In January 2021, we raised aggregate net proceeds of $14.4 million from a registered direct offering and our ATM facility. Based on this additional funding, we currently expect to have sufficient resources to fund planned operations into the first quarter of 2022. This estimate does not include additional development and approval milestone payments we may receive under our current partnership agreements. Our current quarterly cash burn is primarily related to work on Zypure manufacturing, NDA resubmission, and the CLS AX clinical trial. The plan investments in our preclinical work are also incorporated into our operating plans. In summary, we expect that our current financial resources will enable us to potentially reach multiple value-creating events over the next 12 months. We appreciate the interest and support of the investment community and look forward to participating in the upcoming Roth and Needham conferences. I will now turn the call back over to George for his closing remarks.

Thanks, Charlie. I'd like to wrap up our formal comments today with a few final points. First, as the pioneers in treating back-of-the-eye diseases through the suprachoroidal space, we continue to demonstrate that our injection technology platform can be utilized for a range of potential ophthalmic conditions and with multiple therapeutic entities. Second, we have considerably expanded the clinical use of our first-in-class proprietary SCS microinjector. In just the last six months, four clinical programs using our SCS microinjector have been initiated, both from our internal pipeline and from partner-led efforts. That is in addition to our Zypyr program that we expect to reach the development finish line later this year and then be ready for commercial launch. Finally, I'd like to thank the entire ClearSight team who, together with our many valued partners, has provided that it has proven that even in a global environment faced with the uncertainty and restrictions due to COVID-19, much can be accomplished in a short time with focused and dedicated efforts and the desire to make a difference for patients suffering from potentially blinding diseases. We appreciate and value this important opportunity. And with that, I'd now like to ask the operator to open the call for questions.

All right, so as a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one on your telephone. To resolve your question, press the pound key. Again, that is star one on your telephone. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. First question comes from the line of Andreas R. G. Reitz from Redbridge Securities. You are now live.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, team. This is Andreas on for Liana Misatos. Our first question is, with initial data from other PEM VEGF inhibitors now becoming available, what would you like to see as far as rescue free rates at three months in the upcoming readout of OASIS?

Tom, I think that's your question.

Oh, thank you for the question. So the question has to do with potential or projected rescue rates in the upcoming OASIS study. And I just want to backpedal a bit and remind everybody that this study is really, at least the first cohort, is really geared towards safety. This is the first time a tyrosine kinase inhibitor has been injected in man, suprachoroidally. And so, really, the first cohort is geared towards safety. We want to make sure it's well-tolerated before we escalate. So, you know, with that in mind, we have absolutely no prior data on what we can expect with this mode of delivery. And it's very difficult to do cross-trial comparisons from other TKI studies where a the TKI is packaged in a sustained delivery device and injected individually. So it's really hard at this point without any data for me to speculate. And that's really, you know, the whole goal of the study is to collect that initial data, again, geared towards safety with the first cohort and dose escalate thereafter.

Understood. And I'll just ask one follow-up and then jump back in the queue. How are the, thinking about the higher doses in the second and third cohorts, how are those doses being determined and are they predetermined or on a result basis?

Thank you. That's a great question. The question was doses for the upcoming cohort. So as we've noted on clinicaltrials.gov, the initial dose will be 0.03 milligrams. Cohort two will be 0.06 milligrams, and cohort three will be 0.1 milligrams. But your point's well taken. So these are pre-specified, but obviously we have the ability to amend protocol and adjust accordingly.

Okay, thank you, and congrats on the quarter.

Next one on the queue is Annabelle Samimi from Stifel. You are now live.

Hi, all, and congratulations on the progress. A lot going on with your proprietary and your partnered programs. I had a couple here. So I guess first with CLS-AX, I guess I'm not going to ask you to comment on the gray bug data. But, you know, there are a number of pan-VEGF trials that are, Ongoing, starting, about to start, and I'm just wondering from a competitive perspective, would you envision SCS delivery might speed up or possibly slow down the development relative to competitors? For example, if you have longer duration, could this be a problem competitively? I guess it won't matter if you have better data, but how do you think about the development pathway? Is it a race and how do you expect to sort of manage that?

I guess I'll take that to start. So that's a great question. You know, and I think you mentioned other programs. So as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, supracortical delivery of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor is well differentiated from other modes of delivery. We believe there are synergies between the intrinsic properties of excitinib and the the attractive features of supracordial delivery. So first for Exitinib, as you may know, it's a pan-VEGF inhibitor. It's one of the most highly potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors. And it's been shown in preclinical studies to have better compatibility with ocular cells than other TKI. So there may be not only an efficacy benefit intrinsically with Exitinib due to its potency, but potentially a safety benefit. And we think we can leverage that further with supracordial delivery So we know that when we inject small molecule suspension supracordially, we can compartmentalize them in the supracordial space. We get very high levels in that space and very, very low levels in the vitreous and basically undetectable or at the limited detection in the aqueous. So we think by compartmentalizing the drug in the supracordial space, we're going to minimize the risk of any snow globe effects or any off-target effects. And then in terms of efficacy, by achieving very high levels in that space, we can further potentially enhance the efficacy of Exitinib. And finally, we know from the work we've done with several small molecule suspensions, we have multi-month durability. So we think that supracordial delivery of a TKI, a potent TKI like Exitinib, is very well differentiated and clearly potentially separates us from other TKIs. And I might add that, as you know, TKIs have been assessed topically, systemically, and individually. And in many of these cases, there's been a biologic effect. So we think that TKIs probably work, and it's not a matter of mechanism of action, but really one of delivery. And we think we've solved that problem.

Great. And then if I could ask a second question. question, I guess it's regarding Regenexx Bio, their program through 1.4. So we saw the long-term results from the subretinally administered RGX through 1.4, and the durability seemed really good, and I guess that was measured partly by the, also by the rejection of the anti-VEGF, by the reduction of anti-VEGF injections I guess maybe, and some of it went out quite long, and I guess maybe you can help us understand what expectations would be for superchoroidally delivered 314 based on what you saw from the subretinal durability. And what is the possibility of that higher protein expression repeated in humans? I think you saw it preclinically already. So maybe you can talk a little bit about that.

Sure. So it's a great question. And, you know, as you know, Regenexx Bio is in phase two for wet AMD and diabetic retinopathy. They've announced that they've completed an enrollment of patients in cohort one, their initial dose. They expect interim efficacy data from cohort one in the third quarter of this year. And they've already begun enrollment in cohort two. But I want to, again, backpedal a bit and just remind everybody that, once again, this is first in man that a viral vector gene therapy has been injected suprachloridally. And I think that their announcement that has been well tolerated to date is really a huge step forward because As you know, viral vectors can be associated with inflammation when delivered individually, and the fact that they've already announced that it's been well-tolerated, again, is a step in the right direction. So I think, you know, just like our first cohort of our CLSAX study, their first cohort of suprachoroidal delivery of their vector, RGX314, is significant. I would speculate is really geared towards safety. And the fact that it's been well-tolerated to date I think is a huge step forward, not just for Regenexx Bio and RGX314, but really the entire field of viral vector gene therapy, particularly for BioFactory. And, you know, obviously they're going to dose escalate, as they've already done in Cohort 2. And I think just as they've done with their subretinal program with five cohorts, they'll escalate until they find a dose that's not only safe, but also efficacious. So I think we're in the early innings, but I think, you know, it looks very promising so far.

Okay, one last question, if I may. Is there any... work that's being done. I know that it's about who's controlling the commercialization of Zypyr, but have you established or have they established some kind of training program for physicians given that SCS, I mean, I imagine that the SCS delivery would be something that you would, or Zypyr would be something that you would want to use the launch pad in training for all the other programs that are coming down the pike. So can you talk about the training program that's being established for that?

Yeah. I think Tom, you can speak to what MedAffairs has done with, um, with Bausch on training of at least the Bausch employees.

Sure. So, so we have a very robust training program and actually, uh, during this pandemic, we've actually developed a, uh, a hybrid virtual, uh, uh, program where we can ship, uh, our artificial eyes to physician investigators and, uh, we then can be with them virtually via webinar and train them. And we found that that's gone really well. We actually are looking at this with surveys and we'll be presenting this at Arvo as a means of physician training virtually. We also have a very robust in-person training program. And I can tell you that it's been extraordinarily well received by physicians. We recently published what I call our procedure performance paper. It's available on our website, which indicates that the procedure itself is very well accepted by physicians. And our interactions with Bausch as well as with GenX Bio and Aura in terms of training has been really stellar. We've had great experiences with these companies. And finally, I wanted to mention that we have some injection videos on our website. And I think if you could have a chance to view those, I would encourage you to do so because they demonstrate how relatively facile physicians can become with injecting. We actually have an injection video of CLSCX. And you can see from the video that it seems to be well tolerated, it seems to be fairly quick and efficient. So we're really confident that this procedure could be readily adopted in clinical practice when it's approved, especially in the retina community where these physicians love gadgets and love procedures.

Great. Thank you so much.

Great. So, again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone. Again, that is star 1. Next one on the queue is John Wallaban from JMP Securities. You are now live.

Hey, good afternoon, and congrats on all the progress. Just a couple from me as well on CLSAX. Tom, you mentioned a few times that the focus for this first readout big year is going to be on safety, but you are collecting a few different efficacy endpoints. So I was hoping you could let us know specifically what data to look for to midyear on the FSCRI front.

Well, sure. You know, we hate to even call these endpoints endpoints, efficacy endpoints with only five patients. But your point's well taken. They tend to be traditional efficacy endpoints. And again, they're all listed on clinicaltrials.gov. But it'll be the usual endpoints that most companies report. So, of course, we'll have best corrected visual acuity. We'll be looking at the need for rescue. We'll be looking at anatomic features on OCT angiography and OCT angiography, particularly central subfield thickness. And, of course, again, because it's mostly geared towards safety, we'll be looking at adverse events, treatment emergent adverse events, and serious adverse events.

That's helpful. And I think you mentioned that the plan is to start the second cohort in the second half of this year. So I'm wondering how much safety fault have you designated that's necessary before dose escalating, and is that the same between cohorts two and three as well?

Great question. So as you know, patients will be followed for three months after their CLSX injection, and we'll essentially tabulate their results, present it to the safety monitoring committee, and they'll help us decide whether it's safe to move on or not. We plan to start recruitment just at the beginning of the second half of this year and potentially have results from cohort two by the end of the year.

Terrific. And just shifting gears, one last one from me. On the preclinical integrin platform you mentioned, wrapping up the preclinical work this year is the goal. Will we be seeing any of that data this year, and is the expectation to have a lead candidate or multiple? How are you thinking about next steps for the integrin platform?

We've adopted an integrin inhibitor. We're very excited about this particular integrin inhibitor because it targets patients the alpha V beta 3, alpha V beta 5, and alpha 5 beta 1, which have been implicated in some of these important retinal diseases like diabetic macular edema, AMV, and diabetic retinopathy. We're currently formulating this as a small molecule suspension. It's currently undergoing preclinical testing to assess the ocular tolerability, the ocular distribution, and pharmacokinetics. As you know, we've done a significant amount of work with small molecule suspensions, and we expect it to be well-tolerated, to show favorable distribution, that is to be high levels in the targeted core retinal tissue layers and low levels anteriorly, and to have multi-month durability. So we will hopefully be wrapping those studies up this year and sharing some of those results with the retina community and the investment community.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions, and congrats on the progress again.

Thank you for your interest.

And there are no further questions at this time. I will now turn it over back to Dr. Lazyski.

Well, thank you for joining us on the call this afternoon. We appreciate your continued interest in ClearSight, and we look forward to updating you on our progress. Operator, you may now disconnect the call. Thanks again.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.