This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

CPS Technologies Corp.
5/1/2025
Morning
and welcome to the CPS Technologies first quarter 2025 earnings call. At this time all participants have been placed on a listen-only mode. The floor will be open for questions and comments following the presentation. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to your host Chuck Griffith, Chief Financial Officer at CPS Technologies. Chuck, the floor is yours.
Thank
you, Tom. Good morning, everyone.
Today I'm joined by Brian Mackey, our President and CEO. We look forward to discussing our first quarter 2025 results with you. Of course, Chris Woody, our Investor Relations Advisor, will provide a brief State Harbor statement.
Chris?
Thanks, Chuck, and good morning, everyone. Before we begin the business portion of today's call, I would like to point out that statements in this conference call that are not strictly historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and should be considered as subject to the many uncertainties that exist in CPS's operations and environment. These uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Israel, other geopolitical events, economic conditions, market demands, and competitive factors. Such factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in any forward-looking statement. Additional information can be found in our filings with the SEC. Now, we'll turn the call over to Brian to offer his perspective on the first quarter after it's Chuck will review the financial results in greater detail. Brian?
Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. Very pleased to report that our revenue for first quarter established a new record for our company at $7.5 million. This is particularly noteworthy as our previous quarterly record of $7.4 million included $2.89 million in armor revenue, while the most recent quarter had no armor revenue. In summary, we have fully replaced the loss of armor revenue with growth in sales of our other products. Additionally, we generated an upper-rating profit for the quarter of approximately $130,000. While there is still room for improvement, this does put us back in the black. This affirms that our ongoing efforts are paying off and provides renewed encouragement to continue the work of improving our margins as the year progresses. Sales rose year over year, even without any sales of hybrid tech armor, primarily due to the strength of ongoing contracts, increased production output, and recent and ongoing SBIR rules. This is compared to revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2024 of $5.9 million. We are excited about the continued turnaround that is underway based on rising demand for our products, and we are well on our way to record year for revenue for CPS Technologies. With a slow backlog, increased manufacturing capabilities, and improving efficiencies, we anticipate that our efforts will lead to growth in both margins and profitability as the year plays out. I will now turn the call over to Trump to provide further details about our financial results, after which I'll provide some additional perspective. Okay. Thanks, Brian. As I just mentioned, we're very pleased with this order's performance, particularly on the revenue side. The company's revenue for the quarter totaled a record $7.5 million, compared with $5.9 million in June, when official 2024. In a year over year comparison, most of the change is due to continued robust customer demand, strong order backlog, and our ability to increase manufacturing throughput through various measures, including the addition of a third shift of production. This all led to higher capacity utilization. As Brian indicated, our strong first quarter had no revenue for Hybrids Tech Armor versus last year, meaning that we're succeeding in broadening and growing the company's sales of core products to new and existing customers. We expect that the continued strong hotline performance in the quarters to come. We reported a growth profit in the first quarter of $1.2 million, or approximately .4% of sales, compared with its 0.9 million, or .3% of sales last year. This increase was due to higher overall revenue and improvement in manufacturing efficiencies, along with the fact that last year's margin has been negatively impacted by quality control issues. While we're pleased with the improvement in our margins, the entire CCS team remains committed to driving continued margin expansion as the year progresses. Selling general and administrative expenses totaled $1.1 million in the first quarter versus $1.2 million in a prior year period. We continue to manage our costs even while ramping up production output and advancing the strategy of investing for future growth through continued product development initiatives in response to market demand. The company posted an operating profit of about $130,000 in the first quarter compared with an operating loss of approximately $260,000 last year. We reported a net income of just under $100,000, or one cent per share, versus a net loss of around $140,000, or negative one cent per share in 2.1 of fiscal 2024.
Turning to
the balance sheet, the end of the quarter was $1.9 million of cash and $1 million in marketable securities versus $3.3 million in cash and $1 million in marketable securities at the start of 2025. Great cash receivable has grown as our revenue has increased, totaling $6.3 million as of March 29, 2025 versus $4.9 million as of December 28, 2024. Inventories also grew as revenue grew to $4.8 million at the end of the first quarter compared with $4.3 million at the start of the fiscal year. Turning to the balance sheet, the end of the quarter was $1.9 million of cash and $4.3 million in marketable securities versus $4.9 million as of December 28, 2024. Now, Brian will provide a more in-depth discussion of this area. As previously noted, our quarterly revenue set a new record for the company. It represented an increase of 27% of fall year over year and sequentially from the fourth quarter of 2024. Demand remains strong for the company's Altaq and Hermetic packaging products and our order for films has accelerated in response to customer demand. Although our previous order for Hypertech Armors was completed in April of 2024, future orders for Armors are possible given their real world applications and the value to the U.S. Navy fleet. Our ballistic solutions address a large market prosperity types of ships as well as other military applications. We believe they have gained significant support within the Navy as well as on Capitol Hill. Early indications of a strong defense budget next year could positively impact this side of the business. While our revenue growth was impressive even without Armors sales, we recognize there is still work to do to expand our margins and grow the bottom line. The priority of these efforts is well understood within our organization. We have a number of initiatives underway that will enhance the company's profitability through higher asset utilization and improved operating efficiency. Regarding order volumes, since the end of the COVID pandemic we have seen the demand for our MNC products, some of which are incorporated into the power models for electric trillions, return to strong volume levels. Additionally, we believe there are new opportunities emerging that may fuel significant future growth. Historically, computer server farms are not only a major challenge, but our demand are continuous, whereas an outpick baselays is instrumental in addressing the challenges related to frequent temperature spike. Now, however, we are seeing significant movement toward min farms, both offshore and on land, such as in Europe, which can be used to address the dramatically increasing need for electric power driven by artificial intelligence. There is significant interest in IDPTs that use outpick materials for high voltage DC transmission applications, which would represent additional volume beyond our legacy trashing business. While we cannot influence the adoption of our customers' technologies in these applications, we believe that products using outpick materials offer competitive advantages, particularly when used in remote and offshore applications, as these installations are difficult to service and therefore require the extended lifetime associated with outpick products. These initiatives represent a key opportunity for continued CPS growth in the coming years, which would leverage our well-established product portfolio. Turning now to product development, which continues to expand our growing number of solutions, including our family of metal matrix composite products, which we collectively refer to as hybrid tech. We now have six active externally funded research programs, including five SDRs, five SDIRs, two of which are phase two and three of which are phase one, as well as one contract from NAVAIR. We are also waiting for responses to other proposals, including an additional potential phase two contract. As a reminder, all three active phase one awards began in the first quarter, are funded by the US Army, and represent values of $250,000 each over a six-month period of performance. One of these is our first externally funded program for fiber reinforced aluminum, or FRA, where we are leveraging its properties to improve the mileage and operational range of hybrid electric military ground vehicles, which is part of the Army's hybrid electric power training powers and propulsion systems initiative, or HVCCS. This is an encouraging early indicator of market interest in the advantages that FRA can provide. FRA's lightweight relative to competing materials, as well as its higher strength and elevated operating temperatures, make it an appealing alternative for a variety of applications, including aerospace. Several relevant applications of FRA each have market sizes above $1 billion, including aerospace bearings and liners, and replacement of titanium structures. We expect to have material samples in the hands of potential customers later this year. The other two active phase ones are both in support of US Army artillery. One uses ultra-low temperature co-fired ceramics to provide electromagnetic protection for artillery shells, while the other is focused on using additively manufactured tungsten to replicate the sheer properties of the pleated uranium. All of our funded SBIR initiatives, again five in total, are exciting endorsements of our technology, which can lead to new growth opportunities going forward. Our product development team continues to address the challenging requirements of our in novel ways, and we are fully committed to expand against the new markets wherever and whenever we can. Of course, the product development process sometimes involves challenges, of which we are well aware. For example, we previously announced that we had received our first commercial purchase order for hypertech radiation shielding. Unfortunately, we recently received a stop-work notification from our customers, which was followed promptly by a cancellation of the purchase order. The entire program we were supporting was canceled due to reasons unrelated to CPS. Relevant subcontractors, including ourselves, will be paid for the work done prior to the cancellation. We will keep our investors informed that the contract is renewed in the future. In the meantime, we continue with our phase two DOE radiation shielding contract, which extends until late 2026. Although we are early in phase two, we continue to address early commercial interest in our radiation shielding offerings from customers with a variety of use cases. The market is affirming that our novel solution has real world value. Our hypertech radiation shielding is targeting an estimated $4 billion market with multiple foreign factors, which include modular walls, cladding, glove boxes, and truss shelves. We continue our work to drive the broadening portfolio of products for commercialization in fiber reinforced aluminum. As we've said before, we believe CPS has unique technologies and capabilities to meet the banding requirements for a host of potential clients worldwide. We also remain on track to use our new internal 5-axis machining capability for our first customership this summer. This additional production enhancement for magnetic packaging is helping lay the foundations for addressing a broader array of market opportunities. Specifically, we estimate the available market for 5-axis machined magnetic package components to exceed $50 million, with gross margins in the low to -30% range at high volumes and potentially higher on smaller orders. We continue to leverage our proprietary know-how, including the design, manufacturer, and testing of aluminum infiltrated products into the hybrid tech name to deliver unique material properties. We are identifying specific customer challenges where we believe we can bring value to novel solutions based on our core competencies in the general time. In closing, we are pleased with our ongoing successful turnaround in the outlook for 2025. Our production levels and shipments are at record levels, which we believe puts us in a position for our best year ever. We also anticipate that production climbs and efficiencies increase, that our margins will continue to expand through the year, strengthening our balance sheet in the process. We will throw up an end for our products, new market opportunities, and an expanding portfolio of products under development the coming quarters look bright. I'd like to thank our employees for their passion and dedication, and our investors for their patience and interest in the future of CPS. We'd now like to open up the call for questions.
Tom? Certainly. The floor is now open for questions. If you'd like to join the queues, ask a question at this time. Please press star one on your telephone keypad. Once again, please press star one on your keypad at this time if you wish to join the queue to ask a question. We do ask if listening on speakerphone this morning that you pick up your handset while asking your question to provide optimal sound quality. Once again, please press star one at this time if you wish to join the queue to ask a question. Please hold a moment
while
we poll
for questions. Thank you. Our first question this morning
is coming from Kenneth Towns. Kenneth, your line is live. Please go ahead.
Good morning, gentlemen. Excellent quarter. It seems like you're really advancing on several different product categories. Is there potential to bring in other partners to help market your unique technologies?
We have, thank you, Ted, for
the question. We have some partners that we utilize for the -to-day basis in certain places. We have a long and established relationship with a partner in hermetic packaging as well as several sales reps in different geographies. And I think going forward we'll continue to look at those opportunities as they emerge and we get closer to commercialization in a given area. You know, for example, the cloud reinforced aluminum is very relevant to aircraft and we have ongoing discussions with some of the participants in that market and keeping our eyes open for opportunities that might be fruitful going forward.
Great. He talked a lot about the radioactive shielding. He said there's one contract was canceled but there's other several important opportunities there.
Yeah,
what we're hearing from the market is interest in our solution. We were originally funded by the DOE to develop a solution to be used in trucking. A lightweight barrier to radiation, particularly neutron gamma radiation and under the simple concept that the lighter the truck is, the more cargo you can put on the truck and targeting the transportation of NMRs, nuclear microreactors. What we found as soon as we started sharing our results from the early development effort was other market players were intrigued by what we're offering, particularly places like facilities. So if you're able to use one of our designs for a modular wall, you don't need a much thicker, much heavier concrete wall or a lead wall or some of these other alternatives that are problematic for specific applications like if you have a small love box. So we're getting a lot of interest which is affirming that we have something that's unique and valuable and we're exploring those even while we're still early in phase two.
All right, thank you.
Thank you. Your next question is coming from Ron Richards. Ron, your line is live. Please go ahead.
Good morning guys. Congratulations on the record revenues. I just have a question. Do you have like any other potential armor opportunities in the pipeline besides the Navy contract?
Yeah,
the Navy contract is certainly number one. We do have other opportunities that we're pursuing. Most notably, I would point to the phase one warming solution that we developed with SBIR phase one funding which was targeting flooring for military helicopters that have ballistic protection. So we used our method to develop a flooring and during the phase one we conducted a successful box drop test which is literally, you know, can drop a heavy box on it and it provides the structural support you need. Unfortunately, the Army did not have any funding for phase two for any applicant so we didn't make a proposal. But after the phase one we conducted our own ballistic shoot of those panels that we had developed and had very nice ballistic results. So you really need to do two things. Have the structural support that passes the box drop test and number two, holistically stop a projectile from the bad guy and we were able to demonstrate that. So we're now sharing those results with people like helicopter OEM and pursuing those conversations and we're
interested to see where that goes as well. Okay, thank you.
Thank you. And once again as a reminder, if you wish to join the queue at this time, please press star one on your telephone keypad. Once again that'll be star one on your keypad at this time to join the queue to ask the question. Our next question this morning is coming from Stephen Taffy. Stephen, your line is live. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning guys. Sorry I missed the annual meeting the other day. I had more traffic than not been accepted but was able to make it happen. Anyway, my question is about the current tariff environment. I mean I just had to keep track of all these things but seems like there are tariffs on aluminum in the last I heard and of course any overseas products might be subject to tariffs either way. And so, have you seen that?
Yeah sure. So I guess the good news
from our standpoint is that materials or raw materials don't make up a huge percentage of our finished products. So aluminum is probably a good example. So the cost of aluminum in a base plate is probably in the neighborhood of five to ten percent, depending on the size, of that base plate. And so an increase in the cost of aluminum while certainly is not something that we're put forward to, it's also not something that's going to have a huge impact on the bottom line in terms of what those tariffs might bring. And we also, again, I guess it's sort of a two-sided coin, we also know that some of the aluminum we get is domestically produced but of course the other side of that coin is that the domestic producers realize that they can raise their prices too, maybe not as high as the corn, you have to be importers, but certainly they're going to take advantage of that opportunity if they can. So I don't think it's going to be a major problem for us, but it's certainly not a good thing, let's put it that way. Yeah, on the import side we're keeping an eye on the different supply chain items that are either coming directly to us from an overseas supplier or are sourced domestically but maybe originally somewhere else. And adjusting our purchasing accordingly, obviously there's a lot of uncertainty today. On the sales side, we're monitoring that as well because we do ship internationally, we as of today we have not seen any impact from retaliatory tariffs on the sales of our goods. And I just want to make that we're constantly reviewing our supply chain, our vendors, to see who is out there and if there are opportunities for cost savings by going through a different source. So that's kind of an ongoing thing as well which could potentially help us out if a vendor today gets hit particularly
hard by tariffs but there are other ones out there that won't. All right, great, thanks. One more kind of related question
if I might. So I haven't looked at the financials closely but if you were going to tell me you had revenue of seven and a half million, I would have thought the profit margin might have been larger than that. Was it a product mix or am I just playing wrong about that?
So I
agree. I think that what we talked about recently is the fact that when we added our third shift which started last summer, late last summer, we had a lot of, we had a big learning curve to go through and if you were to look at our profit yield going back a year ago, you would see that they were very good or reasonably good. Those yields came down, down, down. They probably hit the 12 or at the bottom maybe October, November of last year and they've now been coming back up again. They're still not to the level that we want them at and they're still not to the level they were a year ago. So we're continuing to improve in those areas but I think that's probably the major reason why we didn't see higher margins than what we did see. And as Brian mentioned during his talk earlier, something that we're very focused on, get that improvement so that hopefully we do the same number in Q2, we'll see a much better Yes, and two things to add to that. The armor revenue was beneficial to our gross margin percentages so without that there is an impact there. But we do have a number of initiatives underway both for internal operations as well as supply chain which we anticipate will continue to move that number in the right direction.
Okay, great. Thanks Brian.
Sure. Thank you. Your next question is coming from Greg Weaver. Greg, your line is live. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning gentlemen. Nice to see you in the black here this quarter. Following on to the prior question, that's where I was going with the similar vein. So Chuck, you mentioned about the yield issue. So to the recollect there were two issues. You had a process issue and then a staffing issue between staff that was you know causing your fallout. I guess kind of where are you on both of those items which has to be related to your ramp back? Yeah, so I think that you know I think from a staffing standpoint where you know we're still working our way through that. I mean certainly we've got some folks now in particular on the ship that have been here for a period of time and are you know and are getting it. But you know they're still you know they're still turnover. I don't think that will probably ever go away completely but you know we're basically just working our way through it and you know the more you know the more stability we can get there then obviously the better off we are. So as I said we're not there yet but you know but we're continuing to improve and I think you know like I said before we think if we were to do the same top line numbers again this quarter then I would I would insist and I would hope that we'll see some improvements in the bottom line. Greg, I think the other part of your question was going back several months to a quality issue and the short answer we do believe we have that addressed and what we're seeing now is unrelated to that. All right good thanks Greg that's helpful. All right so the dare at this kind of run rate with this product mix care to share any kind of goal you might have to where you'd like to see gross margins get to if you could tighten up some of these things. I mean you mentioned utilization third shift so I mean you're you're running this thing pretty hard in terms of utilization. Yeah I mean I think you know we do have some internal initiatives to you know for margin improvement. I think you know that well I mean obviously you can look and you can see that we have margins in the neighborhood of 30 percent for a couple of quarters. You know back I want to say 2023. Certainly you know if you want to talk about a goal you know that would be a nice goal or is a goal. I'm not sure that you know with the current product mix we can get to that level but you know certainly as we're taking forward we're doing everything we can to try and obviously you know 16 and a half percent basically this past quarter you know if we can get get to 20 get 22 to 25 you know that kind of thing that would be that would be great. Yeah with the demand that we have I mean there's certainly an ROI on all this work so we have some initiatives that will bear fruit in the short term those will be relatively small in the time frame that some of the larger initiatives we have will take more time to play out and potentially have a bigger impact on margins and the third shift is for our out thick or no matrix composite products whereas under genetic packaging we're really at two tails or one plus you know so there's there's also opportunity there but I would agree with Chuck's numbers. Okay thanks Brian. So just last for me I mean given your top line run rate you mentioned how you're filling in the hole from the armor I gotta believe with this semi backdrop here that you have to be taking share from your competitor right at your end customer I mean what are your tributes of strength to him in his business got that much better? I think it's a mixture of both I think we're picking up market share I think we're picking up some new customers which is probably taking someone else's business I think we're picking up additional products from existing customers such as informatic packaging but I also think both of these product lines being in the same environment as the other are we're riding the growth of these markets as well as combination of factors.
Okay yeah thank you. I'm sorry.
Yeah I was just going to say you know what Brian mentioned earlier you know just about you know the growth of the market due to the expansion of you know the electrical grid and fact that again you know I know in the United States it's not as big a thing but certainly we're seeing overseas the you know the desire for more and more wind farms and those are areas that you have you need an ALPIC ITBT module with an ALPIC base plate and so we think that a lot of the market.
Okay great well thank you for answering the questions and keep it going appreciate it thank you.
Thank you at this point there appears to be no further questions in queue so I'll turn the call back to Mr. Mackey for any closing remarks.
Great thanks
Tom. Thanks everyone for joining us today and your ongoing interest in CPS technologies. We'll of course take it with you again at the end of the second quarter. In the meantime if you have any questions please reach out to our investor relations advisor. We will also be participating in the SIDOTI virtual investor conference
later this month. Thank you.
Thank you. This does conclude today's conference call. You may disconnect your phone lines at this time and have a wonderful day. Thank you once again for your participation.