This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q1 2024 FTAI Infrastructure Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 11 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your questions, please press star 11 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Alan Andrini, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
spk02: Thank you, Dede. I would like to welcome you all to the FTI Infrastructure First Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. Joining me here today are Ken Nicholson, the CEO of FTI Infrastructure, and Scott Christopher, the company's CFO. We have posted an investor presentation and our press release on our website, which we encourage you to download if you have not already done so. Also, please note that the call is open to the public in listen-only mode and is being webcast. In addition, we will be discussing some non-GAAP financial measures during the call today, including adjusted EBITDA. The reconciliation of those measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in the earnings supplements. Before I turn the call over to Ken, I would like to point out that certain statements made today will be forward-looking statements, including regarding future earnings. These statements by their nature are uncertain and may differ materially from actual results. We encourage you to review the disclaimers in our press release and investor presentation regarding non-GAAP financial measures and forward-looking statements, and to review the risk factors contained in our quarterly report filed with the SEC. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Ken. Okay. Thank you very much, Alan, and good morning, everyone. This morning, we will be discussing our financial results for the first quarter of 2024, and in doing so, I'll be referring to the earnings supplement, which we recently posted to our website. Before getting into the financials, I'm pleased to report that our board has authorized a $0.03 per share quarterly dividend to be paid on May 29th to the holders of record on May 17th. Now on to the results. First quarter adjusted EBITDA prior to corporate expenses came in at $37.2 million, up 24% from the first quarter of 2023, and largely in line with EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2023 when you exclude the impact of several one-time items at our Jefferson Terminal. Our performance for the quarter was driven by continued strength of Transtar, our biggest cash flow generator, and steady operations at Longridge, while Jefferson results were impacted by a longer-than-expected maintenance overhaul at the Motiva refinery, which I'll talk more about shortly. Looking forward, we expect Q2 to demonstrate continued momentum across our companies as a result of new business wins and multiple initiatives, which we implemented last year. We continue to forecast generating in excess of $200 million of run rate EBITDA during 2024. In terms of the highlights at each segment, Transtar posted $21.7 million of adjusted EBITDA, generating new records in each of car loads, average rates, and revenue. Operationally, Transtar had an excellent quarter and would have posted record EBITDA after adjusting for fuel surcharge timing and the receipt of 45G tax credits, which hit the P&L only in the fourth quarter of each year. Pricing increases and several new business activities, including our new rail car repair facility, having already begun to contribute in 2024, so we expect momentum to continue at Transtar in the year to come. At Jefferson, EBITDA was $6.8 million for the quarter, reflecting the 45-day maintenance overhaul at the Motiva refinery. Had Motiva operations stayed steady, we estimate EBITDA would have exceeded $10 million in Q1. With the outage behind us, Jefferson operations are more active than ever, and the most recent month of April has posted record volumes and revenues, putting us on pace to post-record results in Q2. At Rapana, we made significant progress on our Phase 2 expansion project that will transform our business and long-term EBITDA generation. And finally, at Longridge, results reflect consistent operations, at a 98% capacity factor, as well as reduced third-party gas sales given the lower price environment for natural gas. We continue to be extremely optimistic about our prospects at Longridge, particularly for AI data center demand, and believe the opportunity for creating substantial value from behind-the-meter customers is stronger than ever. Briefly on the balance sheet. Total debt of $1.3 billion at March 31 was unchanged from last quarter. $562 million of debt was at the corporate level, while the rest of our debt was at our business units. Transstar continued to be completely debt-free, while approximately $753 million of debt was at our Jefferson segment and $50 million was at Rapano. This week, we plan to launch a new debt financing at Jefferson, with proceeds used to refinance a portion of our existing debt coming due next year and to finance construction of dock improvements at our new Jefferson South site in connection with the long-term clean fuels contract we signed last year. Importantly, as part of the upcoming Jefferson financing, we also plan to incorporate a tender offer for some of our existing debt, allowing us to opportunistically take advantage of the embedded discount and some of our outstanding tax exempt bonds, which carry lower coupons. If successful, the tender offer will enable us to reduce our aggregate debt balance in a cash flow neutral manner, ultimately increasing the equity value of Jefferson. We expect the financing to be in the market over the next couple of weeks and close in late May or early June. I'll now talk through the detailed results at each of our segments and then I'll plan to turn it over to questions. Starting with Transtar on slide seven of the supplement, Transtar posted record revenue of 46.3 million and adjusted EBITDA of 21.7 million in Q4 compared with revenue of 44 million and adjusted EBITDA of 23.6 million in Q4. Car load volumes, average rate per car, and total revenue all came in at new records in the quarter. Fuel expenses were slightly higher versus Q4 last year given the typical lag in fuel surges that we received. In Q4, we also experienced lower expenses versus this Q1 due to the impact of these 45G tax credits, which hit our P&L in a positive way in Q4 every year as opposed to being spread over the entire year. Had fuel expense and the tax credit dynamic been consistent with Q4, our first quarter EBITDA would have been another record result. We're making great progress on our various initiatives to drive incremental revenue and diversify our customer base. On June 1st, we will commence a lease with Norfolk Southern for a 41-mile extension of Transtar's current East Ohio Valley Railroad. The extension provides Transtar with additional commercial opportunities which have potential to contribute meaningful EBITDA in the near to midterm. We expect these new opportunities, together with similar ones at other Transtar railroads, to represent approximately $4 to $6 million of quarterly EBITDA or 20 million on an annualized basis. Now on to Jefferson. Jefferson generated 18.6 million of revenue and 6.8 million of adjusted EBITDA in Q1 versus 19.3 million of revenue and 14.3 million of EBITDA in Q4. During the quarter, Motiva undertook the 45-day maintenance overhaul of its large crude distillation unit in Coker. The result was a temporary reduction in crude throughput at Jefferson, driving lower volumes and revenue during the overhaul. Had it not been for the turnaround, quarterly EBITDA would have exceeded Q4 when adjusting for Jefferson's Q4 gain on sale. By the end of the quarter, throughput volumes to Motiva returned to normal, and we saw record volumes of over 200,000 barrels per day in the month of April, a new monthly record putting us on pace for a record 2Q ahead. More importantly, the new business environment at Jefferson remains robust, and we are advancing more opportunities for both conventional energy products as well as clean hydrogen-based fuels. In addition to the new 15-year contract for the trans-living and export of ammonia commencing in 2025, we made good progress on three additional projects and advanced negotiations, which together with last year's ammonia contract represent approximately $75 million of annual EBITDA and will be transformational for Jefferson. As we said last quarter, if we're successful in converting these opportunities to business-wins, we will far exceed our prior targets of $80 million of annual EBITDA. Briefly on Rapano, with Phase 1 operations continuing, our negotiations are nearly complete in connection with our larger Phase 2 transloading system. We expect Phase 2 to quadruple the capacity of natural gas liquids handled at the terminal. I'm confident we'll sign up our first customer for Phase 2 here in the second quarter and start construction immediately thereafter. In the aggregate, we expect Phase 2 to cost approximately $200 million to build, funded entirely with tax-exempt debt, and that generated approximately $40 million of annual EBITDA once complete. And closing out with Longridge. Longridge generated $10.4 million in EBITDA in Q1 versus $5.1 million in Q4. Power plant operations were steady at the 98% capacity factor, while gas production continued to be managed down during the quarter in the currently lower gas price environments. Remember, at gas prices of under $1.50 per MMBTU, our profit on third-party sales is less meaningful, so we limit production and opt to keep excess gas in the ground. Most importantly, we've been actively advancing a handful of significant opportunities with on-site power customers at Longridge, which will have a significant positive impact on EBITDA. We continue under a letter of intent with the data center developer for the lease of property and utilization of a substantial portion of our power capacity. The LOI is a key step toward the execution of what we expect to be a long-term binding agreement. On a macro level, data center demand in the PJM region alone is projected to go from 3 gigawatts of power needs currently to nearly 17 gigawatts over the next five to six years. New renewable resources will simply not be sufficient to meet this demand, and owners of modern, efficient gas plants like Longridge have the potential to benefit greatly in the coming years. To wrap up, we're pleased with the quarter and expect you to and the quarters ahead to reflect our continued momentum. I'll turn the call back over to Alan. Thank you, Ken. Didi, you may now open the call to Q&A.
spk00: Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star 1-1 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 1-1 again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. And our first question comes from Juliano Bologna of Compass Point. Your line is open.
spk01: Good morning, and it looks like you guys have made a lot of progress around new initiatives, so that's great to see. As a first question, you know, I'd be curious if you can expand a little more on the Jefferson debt transaction that you were referring to, what you're trying to achieve in terms of, you know, capturing the discount and then, you know, what you think you might end up doing on the back end in terms of, you know, new financing to complete that transaction.
spk02: Yeah, happy to. Good morning, Giuliano. Yeah, so as I said, that's a financing we expect to launch here in the very, very near term, next few days. Purpose of financing is in part to just refinance and extend maturities on some debt we have coming due next year. But we're certainly going to take advantage of some of the embedded discount in our existing tax-exempt bonds. And just to put that in perspective, at Jefferson today, we have a number of tranches of tax-exempt debt that hold coupons that are as low as 1.8%. Many of them have a two-handle. And as a result, those bonds are trading at, let's say, a market yield of 5% to 6% in a very long duration. They have 20 to 25 years left prior to their maturity. meaningful discounts to par in order to yield five or six percent. So there's significant opportunity for us to tender for those bonds at a premium to their current trading level, but still at a deep discount to their par amount. So what we'll simply do is issue new debt to raise the proceeds to buy back the old debt at a much lower price. The net effect of it all is zero impact on cash flow at Jefferson, but a significant reduction in debt. Depending upon the tender and the results from the tender, we think the amount of discount that we might be able to capture is somewhere between $75 million and $125 million.
spk01: That is very helpful. I appreciate that. Let's switch over to the long red side. I'd be curious, you know, it seems like there's been a lot of action with data center demand in Ohio, that, you know, Ohio is kind of, you know, taking over for Virginia in terms of being, you know, a little bit of an epicenter for kind of new data center demand as projects move a little further out. I'm curious if you're seeing that with the demand for potential data center opportunities behind the meter at Longbridge.
spk02: Yep, definitely seen an increase in the inbound calls from the ultimate users, some of the big AI companies, as well as the infrastructure companies that develop data centers. I would say we've seen a significant pickup in activity just over the past few months, and we're engaged with multiple parties, which is definitely encouraging. I mean, the math, I've got to say, is... is extremely compelling. At Longridge today, we produce or generate 485 megawatts of power and we sell it into the grid today at just under three cents per kilowatt hour. So just to give you a sense of the economic impact of behind the meter customers like data centers, we generate today just under three cents per kilowatt hour of revenue at Longridge. The going rate For AI data centers, and the cost of power is about $0.08. So almost three times what we are generating today. There is no material increase in the cost of generation, and so you can do the math. I mean, that has a massive impact on EBITDA. EBITDA today is, you know, on an annualized basis just from the power plant, about $80 million. If we get anything close to $0.06 to $0.08 per kilowatt hour, EBITDA would double or triple at Longridge. So it's a huge opportunity. It's obviously a great macro, strong demand, limited supply. We really like the setup and we like what Longridge has available. So it's a major priority for the company.
spk01: That's great. And then shifting over to Jefferson, you obviously have a pretty big pipeline with the 75 million of additional opportunities. I'm curious when I look at those new opportunities, Are there any specific commodities that you're planning on transloading or focusing on related to those new contracts or new opportunities there?
spk02: Yeah. There are four total contracts. I would say in terms of two of them are for conventional fuels, crude oil and derivatives, and two are for clean fuels. In terms of volumes, the clean fuel contracts are materially more volume. So on a percentage basis, we like what it does to Jefferson in terms of the mix of product handle. It's a meaningful shift toward cleaner products, which is generally a good thing. But two of the contracts are for crude and crude derivatives. Those are both at our main terminal, and those are new deals with existing customers. whereas the two contracts at Jefferson South are for clean fuels, carbon-free ammonia, blue ammonia, and those are with new customers. One contract has been signed at Jefferson South. The other is advancing pretty rapidly. I think we're a few months away from having that at a point where it's at a final stage, and so we're We're excited about that. I do think Jefferson South is very promising as a new clean energy hub. It will be just with this first contract that we've already signed for blue ammonia export. It will be the largest gateway for the export of ammonia, you know, in the Gulf Coast. And so we're excited to get that project going.
spk01: That's very helpful. And then just know where France are. You've obviously been working on third-party contracts there. I'd be curious, when you originally acquired Transtar, what percentage of the business was going from third parties versus now? And then where do you think that could go by the end of 24?
spk02: Well, it was largely nonexistent when we acquired the company. I mean, it was just not part of Transtar's business to do any work for third parties. This was an internal subsidiary of U.S. Steel that was deeply discouraged from handling or serving any customers not named U.S. Steel. So it was single digits of revenue from third parties. Today we're at, I want to say, somewhere between $22 million and $25 million of annual revenue from third parties. Our long-term goal is to triple or quadruple that number. By the end of this year, we add about $10 million of incremental third-party revenue every year. So by the end of this year, we should be running at about $30 to $35 million of third-party revenue.
spk01: That's very helpful. The one thing I was just curious, which is a quick follow-up, to make sure I didn't miss it in the prepared remarks, you had mentioned that Norfolk Southern 40-mile extension. I'm curious if you mentioned anything about around a central timeline around that. That was the only thing I was curious about there.
spk02: We take over that track. The East Ohio Valley Railroad is a current asset in TransDarts, relatively short, and we connect with the NS up in Mingo Junction, and we've been negotiating with NS to get, you know, this is not uncommon for Class 1s to handover or lease some of their lower density rail lines to short lines and regional railroads. And so we take over that line actually on June 1st, just in a few weeks, which in and of itself is a good thing. It's a minimal operating expense. It's almost no rent that we'll be paying. We'll just take over the line and we'll handle maintenance of the line. We're already handling maintenance on the portion of track that obviously we own. So that's relatively straightforward. What's most important is there is a large development opportunity located on the new leased track. And we've been negotiating with the counterparty, hence the interest in taking over that additional trackage from NS so that we can actually handle the loading of freight and the assembly of trains for then transporting up to Mingo Junction where we'll hand off the trains to Norfolk Southern. Excited about it. It's been in the works now for several months, but it is imminent, and we'll be taking over that track in the coming weeks.
spk01: That's very helpful. And then one final one. You obviously discussed a number of very large central contracts at both Jefferson and Rapano. And I'm curious if the types of contracts that you're asking are large enough to be 8K events or press release events.
spk02: Yeah, generally wait until the quarter to announce those types of things. I think there are a handful of these projects that are meaningful enough to probably give rise to reporting them intra-quarter by way of a press release and 8K. I think it's just a combination of the size of the transactions and the duration, the certainty with you know, minimum volume commitments, which all of our contracts have today and all the contracts we're negotiating will have. So I do think it's likely that, you know, as it relates to some of the projects I described earlier, I think it's more likely, you know, we'll make a – we'll issue a press release upon execution of those agreements because they're, you know, they're material enough to do so.
spk01: That's very helpful. I appreciate it, and I will jump back in the queue. Thank you.
spk00: Thank you. This concludes our Q&A session. I'd now like to turn it back to Alan Andreini for closing remarks.
spk02: Thank you, DeeDee, and thank you all for joining us today. We look forward to updating you after Q2.
spk00: This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating, and you may now disconnect.
Disclaimer