This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk03: Greetings. Welcome to the Gladstone Capital Corporation's first quarter earnings call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero from your telephone keypad. Please note, this conference is being recorded. At this time, I will turn the conference over to Mr. David Gladstone, Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Gladstone, please go ahead.
spk06: Well, thank you, Rob. Nice introduction and good morning, everybody. This is David Gladstone, chairman, and this is the earnings conference call for Gladstone Capital for the quarter ending December 31st, 2022. Thank you all for calling in. We're always happy to talk with our shareholders and analysts and welcome the opportunity to provide the update for the company. Now we'll hear from our general counsel, Michael Lacalce, who will give a statement regarding certain forward-looking statements. Michael.
spk01: Thanks, David, and good morning, everybody. Today's report paintings forward-looking statements on the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including those regarding our future performance. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that are based on our current plans, which we believe to be reasonable. And many factors may cause our actual results to be materially different from future results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including all risk factors Our form is 10Q10K and other documents we file with the SEC. You can find them on the Investors page of our website, www.gladstonecapital.com. You can also sign up for our email notification service. You can also find the documents on the SEC's website. That's sec.gov. Now, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of these photos and statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. today's call is an overview of our results, so we ask that you review our press release and Form 10-Q, both issued yesterday, for more detailed information. Again, you can find those on the Investors page of our website. With that, I'll turn it over to Bob Markoff. Bob?
spk05: Thank you, Michael. Good morning, all, and thank you for dialing in this morning. I'll cover the highlights for last quarter and conclude with some market commentary as we look forward to the balance of 2023. Before turning the call to over to Nicole Schultenbrand, our CFO, to review our financial results for the period and our capital and liquidity position. So beginning with last quarter's results, originations for the quarter were modest at $11 million for the period, which were all add-on investments to existing portfolio companies. Amortization, repayments, and exits were $39 million, so our ending investment balance fell by $28 million for the period. Interest income for the quarter rose 18 percent to $18.4 million as the weighted average loan yield rose 110 basis points to 12.3 percent, and the average investment balance rose 6.6 percent to $589 million. Fee income rose on the period by $900,000 with a number of year-end equity distributions and contributed to the 21 percent rise in total investment income. which was $19.3 million for the quarter. Borrowing costs increased $900,000, or 22%, with higher SOFR rates. However, our net interest margin also rose $1.9 million, or 17%, to a record $13.4 million for the quarter. Administrative costs were largely unchanged. However, net management fees rose by $1.2 million, to 4.6 million or 2.9 percent of assets as new deal closing fee credits were down and incentive fees associated with the increase in investment yields rose compared to the prior quarter. Net investment income increased 1.2 million or 17 percent to 8.7 million or 25 cents per share. The net realized and unrealized losses on the portfolio for the period came in at 3 million and as a result, NAV declined 2 cents per share to $9.06. While higher rates lifted our net interest income, we also reduced our leverage last quarter, and we were still able to generate a 10.9% ROE for the quarter. Based upon the portfolio performance and increase in net interest income, we recently announced a monthly dividend increase to 7.5 cents, or 90 cents annually, and will consider further increases in the coming quarters. With respect to the portfolio, portfolio continues to perform well with generally modest leverage metrics and favorable liquidity profile. However, aftermarket auto and building sector headwinds caused us to reclass edge adhesives to a non-earning which represents 6.1 million or 0.4 percent of assets at fair value. Depreciation for the quarter of $3 million was primarily related to small moves in several equity positions with very little of the depreciation associated with stress or performance of our debt portfolio. Notable portfolio exits for the period included the sale of a couple of equity investments in Targus and Lee's Novomar Capital, which generated realized gains of $10.3 million, and the repayment of R2I, which is a highly leveraged credit and contributed to the 35 percent drop in PIC income for the quarter. In reflecting on our outlook for the balance of 23, I'd like to leave you with a couple of comments. Our balance sheet leverage at the end of last quarter was a bit elevated relative to our target range, and the investment exits along with the accretive ATM share issuance last quarter have positioned us well to support the further growth of our asset base in the coming quarters. While disappointed with the level of originations last quarter, we continue to be optimistic and are well-positioned to continue to grow our debt investments in growth-oriented lower-middle-market companies by 50 to 100 million over the balance of the year, as we did last year. Most recently, in January, we closed a new deal, Neograph, which was a $29 million first lien debt and $2 million of equity co-investment. We have managed our underwriting rigor in the face of interest rate escalation and are fortunate to have our portfolio heavily weighted to senior secured loans, which at present represent 72 percent of our investments. And secured investments have increased to 91 percent of the total investments with a modest overall leverage of under 3.5 turns. With our floating rate investments exceeding our floating rate liabilities by approximately 425 million, and the current floating rates on pace to be up at least 70 basis points for the quarter, we would expect our net interest margin to be up in the range of 750,000 this quarter. And now I'd like to turn it over to Nicole Shelton-Brand. Nicole?
spk00: Thank you, Bob. Good morning. During the December quarter, total interest income rose 2.8 million, or 18 percent, to 18.4 million, based on the increase in prevailing floating rates and increase in earning assets. The weighted average yield on our interest-wearing portfolio rose 110 basis points to 12.3%, with the increase in floating rates on the 91% of the investment portfolio that carries those floating rates. The investment portfolio weighted average balance increased to $590 million, which was up $37 million, or 6.7% compared to the prior quarter. Other income increased by $600,000 to $900,000, which contributed to the $3.4 million, or 21% increase in total investment income for the quarter. Total expenses rose by $2.1 million quarter over quarter as interest expenses rose $900,000 and higher net management fees rose by $1.2 million with higher average assets, increased investment yields, and reduced New Deal closing fee credits. Net investment income for the quarter ended December 31st was $8.7 million, which was an increase of $1.2 million compared to the prior quarter. or $0.25 per share, which exceeds the $0.21 per share dividends paid, and supported the increase to $0.225 per quarter announced in January. The net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $5.7 million, or $0.16 per share, for the quarter ended December 31, as impacted by the realized and unrealized valuation depreciation covered by Bob earlier. Moving over to the balance sheet. As of December 31st, total assets declined to $640 million, consisting of $622 million in investments at fair value and $18 million in cash and other assets. Liabilities declined to $315 million as of the end of the quarter and consisted primarily of $150 million of 5 and 8 senior notes due 2026, $50 million of 3 and 3 quarters senior notes due May 2027, and as of the end of the quarter, advances under our line of credit declined to $108 million. As of December 31st, net assets rose by $8.8 million from the prior quarter end with the realized and unrealized valuation depreciation, which was more than offset by net proceeds from our common share issuance under the ATM program of $1.5 million. NAB declined slightly from $9.08 per share as of September 30th to $9.06 per share as of December 31st. Our leverage as of December 31st declined with a decrease in total assets and ATM share issuance to 97% of net assets. With respect to distributions, Gladstone Capital's monthly distributions to our common stockholders was increased to 7.5 cents per common share effective for the months of January, February, and March, which is an annual run rate of 90 cents per share. The Board will meet in April to determine the monthly distribution to common stockholders for the following quarter. At the current distribution rate for our common stock and with the common stock price at about $10.36 per share yesterday, the distribution run rate is now producing a yield of about 8.7%. And now I'll turn it back to David to conclude.
spk06: Thank you, Nicole. You and Michael and Bob all did a great job of informing our stockholders and analysts that are following the company. In summary, another solid quarter for Gladstone Capital. The company didn't close much last quarter, but it did a good job of exiting some assets and deleveraging the company. So the company is building additional capacity to support the existing portfolio, but also additional investments in the coming quarters. The company has about $112 million of availability under its bank line, so great shape there. Portfolio is in good shape, modest leverage. and very low non-performing assets. Net interest income in the quarter was up 17% based on the higher interest rates in the company's favorable capital structure, and more support the 7% increase to the common distributions that was announced last month. In summary, the company continues to stick with its strategy of investing in growth-oriented middle market businesses with good management. Many of these investments are support of mid-sized private equity funds that we partner with. And they are looking for experienced partners to support the acquisition and growth of the business in which they have invested, usually a lot of equity. This gives us an opportunity to make an attractive interest-paying loans to support our ongoing commitment to pay cash distributions to shareholders. And now we'll call the operator. Rob, tell us how to ask questions about the company.
spk03: Thank you, Mr. Gladstone. To ask a question at this time, please press star 1 from your telephone keypad, and a confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to withdraw your question from the queue. For participants that are using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. Once again, that's star 1. Thank you. Thank you, and our first question is from the line of Mickey Schein with Lattenberg. Pleasure to see you with your questions.
spk04: Yes, good morning, everyone. Bob, first a high-level question. Could you give us a sense of what's going on in the market that prevented you from closing new originations during the quarter?
spk05: Good morning, Mickey. As you may recall, we had a couple of two strong quarters leading up to last quarter, so we were probably pretty well focused on closing, I think, about $120 million of assets. So our pipeline was a little bit thinner. We're also facing a pretty significant step up in underlying rates. So I think we were being a little bit more conservative in the approach that we were taking in terms of which industries, which sectors were going to support the significant step up in rate. I think we are being very careful about not only rates, but what's the economic headwinds are going to affect the revenues in the underlying portfolio. So while we saw a number of credits that were not clearing, we were a little bit more conservative. I think the fact that we've already closed one in January and there are a number still to come, I'm not too worried about a quarter blip. We tend to have those from time to time. Don't tend to happen in fourth quarter, but the overall level of deal activity in the December quarter was generally lighter than what we would normally expect in our end of the market.
spk04: Thanks for that. That's very helpful. And it actually leads to my next question in terms of rising interest rates. With the strong January jobs report, as you know, the forward interest rate curve implies about another 50 basis points of Fed tightening. So how do you see that potentially impacting the portfolio's ability to service its debt?
spk05: Yeah. Let me give you a couple of quick stats, and we've talked about this before. You have to understand the nature of our portfolio. We start with smaller credits. and they gradually grow. At the moment, roughly 70% of our portfolio is to companies with EBITDA under $25 million. So that leaves 30% that's over $25 million. Of the 70% that are the smaller credits that you would probably be most concerned about those issues, 56% of those have leveraged under two and a half. So the majority of the credits where we would probably face stress are extremely low leveraged, in fact, bordering on typical bank type leverage. And the overall leverage profile for that 70% is 3.1 times. So a interest rate move is certainly meaningful, but we're nowhere near anything that would cause particular stress. So we're feeling like the vast majority of our smaller credits today are very lowly leveraged and absorbing any issues that are currently outstanding. And as I've said in the past, we have roughly 70% of the portfolio that is sponsored back. So it again has additional supports that come with it. So at the moment, if we were seeing anything in the way of stress, I think you would have seen a little bit more movement from our third party outside evaluations of the portfolio. So since the majority of the loan movements were very minor, I think it just affirms the fact that the leverage profile and the performance of our portfolio in the face of the escalating interest rates is well positioned.
spk04: I understand that. That's a great explanation, Bob. And one last sort of housekeeping question, maybe for Nicole. When did you actually place edge on non-accrual, and did you reverse any previously accrued interest income on edge?
spk00: So we placed it on non-accrual effective October 1st, and we did reverse one month, so the September 1st. of 2022 month of interest, which was less than 75,000 of interest.
spk04: Okay, that's it for me this morning. I appreciate your time. Thank you. Thanks, Vicki.
spk03: Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question today, we press star 1. The next question is from the line of Robert Dodd with Raymond James. Please receive your questions.
spk02: Hi, and congratulations on the quarter. I also want to So thank you for that detailed answer to Mickey's question on the interest coverage and the leverage by kind of size tier. That's really, really helpful. Um, on, on the, um, the, the pipeline, if, if I can, I mean, you, you, in response and you've prepared the marketing response to some of these questions, right. You, you, you talked about, I've been, obviously it was a little, you, you had originated a lot. So it kind of empties the pipeline. It started to refill again. I mean, how would you, you rank the pipeline in terms of, um, you know, looking forward, maybe beyond, beyond January, um, uh, how it's stacking up and the quality of the businesses that are in it, given you're taking a somewhat more conservative stance on what you're willing to underwrite or how you're willing to underwrite it in this kind of economic uncertainty period?
spk05: It's an interesting question. I would say there's probably a couple of different nuances there, Robert. First off, I think if you read some of the recently released reports, tightening credit conditions has squeezed a lot of folks out of the marketplace today. A lot of the regional banks, a lot of the larger banks, and capital constraints in a number of places have really moved all of the borrowers to the private capital markets. So being open as we are today, we're getting to see an awful lot of stuff. What we are seeing runs the gamut. Deals that didn't close because somebody couldn't fund them to deals that probably shouldn't close, given the uncertainty of the market conditions. So I think what we're seeing is a very wide swath of opportunities, and it's really up to us to stress those against our historical screens to figure out which of those we feel have the forward momentum to be able to deleverage in the way we typically underwrite credits. And so for us, the good news is as time goes on, We're seeing current numbers. We're seeing current, you know, 23 outlooks and budgets. And if people start to, you know, negatively trend to their plan, two things typically happen. Sponsors don't buy them because they're not going to hit their targets. And two, they are not going to give us the profile to deleverage the risk that we were expecting. So, there's a natural the deal falls away because the visibility or the sponsors don't think they can make the valuations work. For us today, you know, we do have a number of things out there, but it's all based on trends that we are seeing continued deleveraging. Obviously, you know, because we do deal with smaller credits, there are pockets where things are doing very well. And our focus in those is really just the sustainability of those businesses. So if we're investing in something that might be positively impacted by electrical vehicles or energy consumption or things like recycling or closed loop or other things that are certainly more on trend and being driven by social trends and government investing, you know, those are places where we're going to see continued growth opportunities. So we're just more mindful of what the realistic 23 outlook might bring for the wider swath of credits that we're seeing.
spk02: Got it. Got it. I appreciate that, Kyle. I mean, kind of follow it, don't I? I mean, the private capital markets, as you say, are still open. I mean, you're still lending. Are you seeing any increase in competition in your end of the market? Given, to your point, there's probably somewhat fewer businesses that actually meet everybody's kind of, not just yours, but others' underwriting parameters. in this environment, is it resulting in more crowding for the deals that are getting done? It doesn't seem to be, right?
spk05: I don't think so. I think the idea of we're, you know, a consistent player. We've got, you know, an established position. You know, more often than not, we're getting calls from sponsors who, you know, the banks flaked on them or Some lender that was relying on the CLO market to support their business or insurance company to back them, you know, isn't there, and we'll certainly get those calls and have, you know, preferential opportunities. And the thing in today's marketplace that I would say is there's no reason for us to stretch. I mean, given our traditional pricing, you know, use a benchmark, seven over or something like that, Today, that's going to generate senior returns in excess of 11%. There's no reason to stretch for extra credit risk. We have had situations where the senior is approaching what would traditionally be subordinated or second lien returns. There's no reason to stretch. The current level of interest rates and the current demand for private capital is giving us a tremendous opportunity to put money out as senior risk as long as it's in the right business. It's generating great returns for us.
spk02: I appreciate that really clear answer. Thank you.
spk05: Thank you for calling in.
spk03: Thank you. At this time, we've reached the end of the question and answer session. I'll now turn the floor back to Mr. Gladstone for closing.
spk06: Okay, thank you all for calling in. I would mention that there's a lot of junk in the marketplace today. A lot of banks have been out of the market and just closed their door to new loans. I guess the regulators are beating on them pretty hard. Anyway, we're in great shape to keep moving forward. I expect this quarter that we're in now that began in January is going to be a strong quarter for us. That's really the end of this presentation. We'll see you next quarter, so thank you all for calling in. Rob?
spk03: Thank you. This will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Disclaimer