GSI Technology, Inc.

Welcome to GSI Technologies' fourth quarter and fiscal year 2026 results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. At that time, we will provide instructions for those interested in joining the Q&A queue. Before we begin today's call, the company has requested that I read the following Safe Harbor statement. The matters discussed in this conference call may include forward-looking statements regarding future events, and future performance of GSI technology that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks and uncertainties are described in the company's Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, I have also been asked to advise you that this conference call is being recorded today, May 7, 2026, at the request of GSI Technology. Leline Hsu, the company's chairman, president, and chief executive officer, will be hosting the call today. With him are Douglas Shirley, chief financial officer, and Didier Lassere, vice president of sales. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Hsu. Please go ahead, sir.

Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us to review our fourth quarter and fiscal year 2026 financial results. Physical 2026 was a year of meaningful progress for GSI, marked by strong performance in our SM business, continued advancement of Gemini tool, tool commercialization, and the initiation of the Pareto design. While I am pleased with the progress we have made on several fronts, significant work remains. Our team is executing our key milestones and advancing business development for the APU, and I have had several encouraging conversations on numerous fronts in recent months. We end the physical 2027 with continuous momentum, promoting the APU and building up on our customer traction. With that, I will now hand the call over to Didier.

Thank you, Leline. Let me start by stepping back and framing where we are today, because I think the context is important. Our SRAM business performed well in fiscal 2026 and remains the revenue foundation of the company, providing cash for APU development. For the full year, the SRAM business grew 22% year-over-year, and gross margins rose to 55% from 49%. The SRAM business has benefited from increased demand from our customers that support high-performance AI chip development and manufacturing. We recently announced that we concluded our strategic review and determined that continuing to execute our standalone strategy is the best path forward for delivering long-term shareholder value. The stronger EdSRAM business and a strengthened balance sheet, along with non-dilutive R&D funding, are providing the resources to support our go-forward plan. With this financial foundation in place, we are now seeing real progress with Gemini 2 and Plato. Over the past several months, we've reached a point where we are seeing both technical validation and early program-level engagement of Gemini 2, including the Sentinel Drone Surveillance POC, the U.S. Army SBIR Award, and a new Phase I Smart City Project, which I'll discuss in a minute. On the technical side, in a bake-off for the Sentinel POC, Gemini 2's performance contributed to winning the contract award by achieving a time-to-first token of roughly three seconds at 30 watts of system power on Gemma 3-12B multimodal workloads at the edge. In this use case, time to first token is a critical metric for drone surveillance system because it reflects how quickly a system can respond in real world applications where response time directly affects critical decision making. We are working closely with the G2 tech team on the Sentinel program. We have completed the software deliverables and continue to target a June demonstration of the Gemini 2 powered drone. This demonstration is planned for the Department of Defense and an international defense agency. In mid-April, we were notified that we had been awarded phase one of a smart city project. The project leverages our work done for the drone-based surveillance POC and marks an important step forward towards commercial deployment. In this application, Gemini 2 will process inputs from distributed camera systems to provide near real-time detection of events such as fires and other public safety risks. This project demonstrates how our platform can scale across real-world infrastructure. We expect to share additional details on the Smart City program around the time of a planned media event in late May hosted by the municipality. Currently, we are working on several projects in tandem. What matters most for GSI at this time is not just the number of early stage trials and demonstrations we have, but also how these early stage engagements are helping us identify where our APU architecture provides a clear advantage, particularly in delivering low latency performance with a constrained power envelope. We are also leveraging our deployment work in two ways. First, we are applying what we have developed for a drone security application to a smart city application. While the end markets are different, the underlying development carries over, giving us meaningful head start, each in a new case rather than starting from scratch. Secondly, as we complete the Sentinel POC and Phase 1 of the Smart City program, we can build on those results to pursue additional opportunities with new customers in those markets. We view this as a repeatable model where each engagement helps accelerate the next. What's exciting for us is that we see the end markets for low latency, low power AI edge and expanding as AI workloads continue to move closer to where the data is generated. These applications favor the APU architecture that can deliver higher compute per watt. Gemini 2 is ideal for these power latency constrained edge deployments where real-time response and energy efficiency are critical. Where we are winning is where Gemini 2 is tested against conventional architectures requiring significantly higher system power for similar or slower responsiveness. We believe Gemini 2 best addresses this gap and positions us well to win as more AI loads shift towards distributed power-constrained environments. Consistent with this, we are encouraged by our progress within defense agency programs as evidenced by our recent U.S. Army SBIR, progressing from phase one into phase two. This project is about enabling real-time infield AI deployment on small, low-powered systems typically operating in challenging conditions. As part of this program, we will build and test a ruggedized node containing the Gemini 2 for real-world mission-critical environments. This SBIR positions us within a broader shift in defense spending with approximately $13 billion proposed in fiscal 2026 budgeted for AI and autonomous systems and creates a potential pathway to follow on programs and future opportunities to supply Gemini 2-based systems. So how do we move from where we are today to design wins and ultimately revenue? From a commercial standpoint, we are still in the early stages. Our focus is on advancing our current engagements and working closely with partners to integrate Gemini 2 into their systems with the goal of moving into design level discussions. Given the complexity of these deployments, we are focusing our resources on a small number of high value opportunities where we believe we have a clear advantage. Although the number of engagements remains limited, we are seeing a meaningful increase in the depth of these engagements and our ability to leverage our prior Gemini 2 deployment work for new related applications. Looking ahead, our priorities are to advance current POCs and awarded programs and to leverage what we've learned from each of these engagements to drive additional design opportunities. At the edge, performance matters most when it can be delivered within real-world power and latency constraints. That is where we believe Gemini's 2 advantages lies. With that, I'd like to hand the call over to Doug. Go ahead, Doug.

In earnings release issued today after the close of the market, you'll find a detailed summary of our financial results for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2026. Rather than walking through the numbers again, I'll focus my comments on the key drivers behind the results and provide more context and explanation to help you better understand the business. Let me start with the results for the fiscal year 2026, ended March 31st, 2026. As DDA mentioned, Fiscal 2026 revenue increased 22.4% to $25.1 million, reflecting continued strength in our SRAM business, particularly with customers supporting chip design and simulation for AI applications. We experienced solid growth in this customer segment throughout fiscal year 2026. We do see variability in customer orders, and sales can fluctuate from quarter to quarter. However, barring any significant change in underlying AI chip demand, that would affect SREM orders for these customers. We expect this business to remain relatively stable in fiscal year 2027. The higher level of revenue and product mix helped to lift fiscal year 2026 gross margin to 54.5%, a notable gain from the prior year gross margin of 49.4%. Operating expenses in fiscal 2026 rose to $31.2 million. compared to $21 million in fiscal 2025. Operating expenses increased year-over-year, primarily driven by higher R&D spending on the Plato chip design. It's also important to note that the prior year included a $5.8 million gain from the sale of assets, which makes the year-over-year comparison appear more pronounced. We also continued to offset a portion of our R&D expenses through non-dilutive funding. SBIR contract funds, and POC-related funding. The majority of our R&D is dedicated to the APU. The R&D offset in fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025 was $1 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Higher operating expenses increased the total operating loss for fiscal 2026 to $17.5 million compared to an operating loss of $10.8 million in the prior year. The fiscal 2026 net loss included interest and other income of $4.1 million, primarily from interest payments on the increased cash balance from the capital raise completed in October 2025, and $3.4 million of other income consisting of a $6.2 million non-cash gain from the change in the fair value of pre-funded warrants, partially offset by $2.8 million in issuance costs associated with a registered direct offering in October 2025. Switching now to the fourth quarter, revenue was $6.3 million with a gross margin of 52.4%. As we've seen in prior periods, quarterly gross margin can fluctuate with the product mix and revenue levels. The fourth quarter gross margin reflects slightly lower semi-quad sales sequentially compared with the prior year quarter. From a customer perspective, we did see some variability across accounts during the quarter, including lowered shipments to certain customers and no shipments to others. At the same time, defense-related sales increased to approximately 46% of total shipments, reflecting continued demand in that segment. Again, you'll find a full breakdown of sales in today's earnings release. Operating expenses increased from the prior year, primarily due to continued investment in our Gemini II and PLATO development programs. These investments align with our strategy to advance our APU roadmap while maintaining discipline to cost management. Last quarter, we expanded quarterly earnings disclosures to help investors better understand the company's cash consumption and cash generation. This information will complement the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows included in our Forms 10-K and 10-Q. Cash flows for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, where cash equivalents as of December 31 were $70.7 million. Net cash used in operating activities in the quarter was $5.5 million. Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $100,000. And net cash provided by financing activities was $2.1 million. Cash equivalents as of March 31, 2026 were $67.2 million. From a cash flow standpoint, spending in the quarter continued to reflect our investment in Gemini 2 and Plato Development. We expect cash usage to remain elevated as it progresses through this development phase. As a general reference point, we expect the cash usage to be approximately $4 million per quarter or about $16 million annually, although this may vary depending on development timing and program activity. We ended the quarter with $67.2 million in cash and no debt. This is a notable improvement from the prior year in cash balance of $13.4 million and is associated with a $46.9 million net of fees registered direct offering proceeds that close in October 2025. The absence of debt and the improved cash balance provide us with the flexibility to continue investing in APU while maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation. We believe our current cash position provides sufficient runway to support the initial commercialization of Gemini 2 and the completion of the Plato 2 tapeout. both expected in late fiscal 2027. Before I hand the call over to the operator for Q&A, I'd like to provide the first quarter fiscal 2027 outlook. For the upcoming quarter, we expect net revenues in the range of $5.9 million to $6.7 million, with gross margin of approximately 54% to 56%. Overall, our strong cash position and continued support from non-dilutive funding give us a runway to advance Gemini 2 into early commercialization and the completion of the Play-Doh chip design. Operator, at this point, we will open the call to Q&A.

Thank you. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the key. To withdraw your question, please press star then 2. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Once again, it's star one to ask a question.

The first question is from Tony Brainerd, retail investor.

Hello, gentlemen. How are you? Good. Thank you.

Yeah, can you share some color on the size, like if you do get the design wins, the size of the market we're looking at?

On which market? On the Gemini 2.

Okay, that's a pretty broad question. So, you know, the markets we're going after initially, you know, some of them are government, military-based, specifically these drone programs. And as we talked about, we're limited detail now. We'll give you more detail on the smart city at the end of May. But both of those markets are multi-billion dollar markets.

Okay. Yep. That's fair enough. And yeah, that's my only question for today. Thank you very much.

All right. Thanks, Tony. Thank you.

Once again, let's try them on to ask a question.

The next question comes from Robert Christian, private investor.

Yes, I'd like to know why the PLATO project has moved up from the first half of 2027 to late fiscal 2027.

So it actually hasn't been pushed out. So it might have been a mixture of calendars and fiscal quarters. So when we had first talked about it, we were targeting – the beginning of calendar 2027 to have the PAR taped out and we're still on schedule for that. So the tape out means that the design will be done in the first quarter and that would give us silicon because we have to make the mass sets that are used from the wafer fabs at TSMC. So we'll see our first wafers in hand in the summertime of calendar 2027 and I believe that has been always our schedule.

Yeah, I think we mentioned the physical year, 2027. That's the beginning of the 2027 calendar year.

Right. That's a good point. So the end of fiscal 2027 is March of calendar 27.

Okay, that would be great. And the second question I have is Gemini 2 taped out over two and a half years ago. Is it going to take that long to see expected sales, say, of Plato?

So that's a great question. So you have two components to sales. You have the hardware component, which is the chip and any kind of a board, and you have the software side. The software side actually lagged the hardware on Gemini 2. With Plato, we're trying to align the two of those more closely. The good news is some of the software work that's being done for Gemini 2 can be used for Plato, while with Gemini 1, it was a completely new effort. And so in that respect, we can leverage some of the work from Gemini 2 for Plato, and then we're also lining up the resources to be able to bring in the software with Plato.

Well, the chip is genius, and

I wish you guys Godspeed. Thank you. Thank you.

At this time, we should no further questions, and this concludes our question and answer session. We'd like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Li-Nin Xu for closing statements.

Thank you again for joining today's call. As a reminder, DDA will be at the LD Micro Conference on May 19. Contact LD Micro if you would like to attend this presentation or take a one-on-one meeting. We are encouraging by the progress we are making the Gemini 2, and we remain focused on successful executing against opportunities in front of us. We look forward to speaking with you again on our physical 2027 first quarter earning call.

This concludes today's conference. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.