This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the HomeBank Corp's first quarter 2024 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to HomeBank Corp's Chairman, President and Board of Loan and Chief Financial Officer David Kirkley. Mr. Kirkley, please go ahead.
spk02: Thank you, Joelle. Good morning and welcome to Home Bank's first quarter 2024 earnings call. Our earnings release and investor presentation are available on our website. I'd ask that everyone please refer to the disclaimer regarding forward-looking statements in the investor presentation and our SEC filings. Now I'll hand it over to John to make a few comments about the first quarter. John? Thanks, David.
spk06: Good morning, and thank you for joining HomeBank Corp's earnings call today. We appreciate your interest in HomeBank Corp as we discuss our strong quarterly results and describe our approach to creating long-term shareholder value. HomeBank delivered a solid first quarter performance with healthy loan and deposit growth and continued expense discipline. We are quite proud of our accomplishments in the first quarter as net income was $9.2 million, or $1.2 and 14 cents per share, which generated a return on assets of 1.11%. Loans increased $40.1 million over the quarter, or about 6% annualized, which is in line with our expectations for 2024. Houston was again a big contributor to our loan growth as we relocated an acquired branch and opened an LPO to house the commercial team we brought on board in the fourth quarter. We will be relocating an additional branch next week in Houston as we continue to invest in our markets and seek ways to drive additional activity. First quarter deposits increased $52 million, following a $73 million increase in the fourth quarter. Deposits have increased by 6.4% since March 31st of last year, which we feel very good about considering everything that's happened in the banking industry in the last 12 months. Our loan-to-deposit ratio came down slightly to 96.3, which is still a little above the upper end of our target range. As we indicated last quarter, we saw some additional pressure on the net interest margin, which decreased to 3.64% in the first quarter. While the last couple of weeks has made predicting rates challenging, we continue to expect them to stabilize around this level in the next two quarters. With that, I'll turn it back over to David, our Chief Financial Officer.
spk02: Thanks, John. Net interest income totaled $28.9 million in Q1, a slight decline of $381,000 from the previous quarter, as deposit costs continued to put pressure on NIM. The pace of deposit migration is certainly slowing, but we're still seeing customers move funds out of savings checking and non-interest-sparing deposits into higher-yielding CDs and money market accounts. The 26 basis point increase in yield on interest-bearing deposits during the first quarter was less than the 40 basis point increase in the fourth quarter and 54 basis point increase in the third quarter. So it does appear that the pace of increase is slowing. As deposit migration slows and the spread between new CD origination rates and the rate of the existing CD portfolio narrows, we should continue to see smaller increase in deposit costs. Page 11 and 12 of our investor presentation provide some additional detail on credit. Non-performing loans increased by $11.5 million in the first quarter to $20.3 million, primarily due to two relationships totaling $9.6 million. The first relationship has loans totaling $4.6 million and is secured by a portfolio of residential investment properties with an LTV in the 65% range, and we expect minimal, if any, losses. The other relationship is about $5 million and was included in the 90 days past due and still accruing bucket, which is not a category we utilize very often. It's a small multifamily construction project that was waiting for its certificate of occupancy, which was just received yesterday. We expect the sale of two units totaling $970,000 to close tomorrow and a couple more units to close this month. Our allowance for loan loss ratio was 1.2%, down two basis points from the prior quarter. The decline in this ratio was due to the migration of CD loans into permanent loans and CECL. There were no changes in our qualitative factors during this quarter, and we feel confident in our reserve levels. Slide 16 has some detail on our historic NIM and its components. As John mentioned, NIM declined by five basis points in the first quarter, but appears close to stabilizing. Slide 17 has our current and historic deposit beta statistics and shows that our cost of the total deposits in Q1 was 1.82%, with a cycle-to-date beta of 32%. At 1.95%, our cost of funding earning assets is 35% of the upper limit of the Fed funds target range of 5.5%. Loan growth picked up in the first quarter to $40.1 million, with an average origination rate of 8.23% during the quarter. Our loan pipeline remains strong, and we continue to expect 4 to 6 percent growth in 2024, but recognize that Fed activity could impact both growth and yields. Slide 18 of the presentation has some additional details on non-interest income and expenses. Non-interest income was stable in the first quarter at 3.5 million. Non-interest expense increased slightly to 20.9 million, but still came in below our forecast due to lower than expected compensation expenses and several P&E projects being pushed further into 2024. Annual salary increases took effect April 1st, and we expect core non-interest expenses to be around $22 to $22.5 million in the second and third quarters. Slide 19 summarizes the impact our capital management strategy has had on home banks over the last few years. We've grown adjustable adjusted tangible book value by 55% since 2018, increased our dividend by 67% since 2016, and repurchased 13% of our shares, all while maintaining robust capital ratios. This positions us to be successful in any economic environment and to take advantage of opportunities as they arise. With that, operator, please open the line for Q&A.
spk00: We will now begin the question and answer session task. A question, you may press star then one on your touchtone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble a roster. Your first question comes from Graham Dick with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.
spk01: Hey, good morning, guys. Good morning, Graham. Okay, I just wanted to start on calling out those two credits in the press release that moved to non-accrual this quarter. It doesn't sound like you guys are expecting much loss there, but I just wanted to know a little more color around industry type of credit and what sort of gives you confidence that you might be able to move these out of the bank without having to really charge anything off?
spk06: Well, the first credit that David described is a situation where there are five partners and one of the partners has kind of turned against the other four. There are, I think, 15 properties. I'm not exactly sure how many properties in a very, very strong location next to Tulane University, and they're all leased and such, but they stopped paying us for some disputes that they're having internally. We have sent a 30-day letter. We have started foreclosure proceedings. The four individuals on one side or trying to find a way to not lose the $2.2 million of equity that they have in the project. As far as our concern is, if they don't update this and bring it current, we'll probably, you know, third quarter, end of third quarter or so, have a sheriff sale, which time I think we'll have no trouble selling it. So it's really about a dispute. It's not the properties aren't bad. They're all in very good shape. They're all leased. It's just a problem with the partners. The second project really was a situation where cost overruns and such, the borrower ran out of funds for the most part. The project is finished. It has its ability to sell. We have two sales tomorrow for $970,000. That will bring all the interest current and also reduce principal by about $750,000. There are two additional sales that will happen before the end of the month. So we feel as though that one will take care of itself now that they've gotten their certificate of occupancy and can start selling the properties. So I would anticipate one of those being off of classified by next quarter, the large one being off. The other one is just going to take until they decide to work together or until a sheriff's sale. But no losses on either one.
spk01: Okay. That sounds good. All right. And I just wanted to kind of turn to them. I think last quarter, yeah, you guys had hoped that obviously it would be maybe a little downside this quarter, but then stabilize in the 2Q and sort of drift higher from there. How do you feel about that? the way that outlook might be evolving given what you're seeing on the rate outlook in the Fed right now, if we were to only get one, two, maybe no rate cuts this year?
spk02: Yeah, I think Q2 is probably going to be a much more stable NIM for home banks. Our deposit costs are kind of starting to peak out, where I mentioned earlier on the call that the spread between our CD portfolio and the rate at which we're putting on CDs right now is narrowing very quickly. So you're not going to see that rapid rise in deposit costs that we have been experiencing. We've also looked at kind of the migration from customers, retail customers specifically, that have been moving funds out of checking accounts into money markets and CDs over the past couple quarters. And that pace has slowed significantly. So It's almost as if the people that were looking for rates have found them, and that outflow into higher-yielding deposit products is slowing, and the pace at which CDs are pricing higher has slowed significantly. On the flip side, we are seeing some success in our loan portfolio. As I mentioned, the weighted average rate of new originations was 8.23%. So that's starting to offset the increase in liability costs as well. So we feel good about a slight decline to stability in NIM and Q2.
spk01: Okay. And then as you just sort of look ahead, do you think that there's a chance that as these deposit costs continue to top off and new loan yields come on at higher rates, given no change to Fed funds rate, do you think the NEM could still tick higher, I guess, in the back half of the year? Is that a possibility?
spk02: I think the pace would be slower, but, yeah, I think it's a possibility that it could tick higher for sure.
spk01: Okay. Okay, great. And then I guess just one more for me is on loan growth. Came in with inside your guidance of mid-single digit, but still a good start to the year. Do you expect – the Houston team to continue to do the heavy lifting there for the rest of the year? And if so, what are you sort of seeing in your legacy markets that are maybe holding back growth there?
spk06: I think all the markets will slow as the year goes on somewhat, especially if rates stay where they are. The Treasury going up, I think, yesterday to 4.6 or whatever. So there is a slowdown. But we have a lot that's in the pipeline right now, some C&D that's starting to build out a little bit. So I think you'll, at the end of the day, I don't know that we'll finish fourth quarter if rates are where they are today with the type of quarter that we had in the first. I think you'll see a diminishing growth rate. Now, it does reduce rates significantly. two or three times, that could change a lot.
spk01: Right, right, right. Understood. Okay. That's it for me. I appreciate it. Thanks, Graham.
spk00: Your next question comes from Brett Rabitin with Hovity Group. Please go ahead.
spk03: Hey, guys. Good morning. Morning, Brett. I wanted to go back to credit and If I look at slide 11, the total substandard, and granted, your criticized assets are still at very low levels, but I saw that the substandard bucket moved up about 7 million link quarter. I was just curious what you were seeing in terms of migration in or out of the substandard bucket in particular, and then just any industries or things that you're seeing incrementally where maybe there's pressure either on revenue or just overall sales?
spk06: I think the general thought for HomeBank that 2024 will continue as 23 did in reducing classified assets. These two one-offs that we discussed momentarily are really not because of the economy as much as it is just mismanagement a little bit in the project. So I don't anticipate that continuing throughout 24. I would anticipate those classifieds coming down as they did towards the end of the year. So we're not seeing any signs that there's a wave of bad assets coming our way.
spk02: Outside of the two credits that we mentioned, there was a little bit of a migration in from a mix between some residential properties, some small CREs, some very small CNI, as well as some outflows that basically were the exact same thing, some residentials, some small CRE, and some various payoffs. So they're kind of washing each other out right now.
spk03: Okay. And then from a capital perspective, your ratios are building a little bit. You bought back a little bit of stock. Any thoughts on the level of buyback activity from here and then – Are you going to keep maybe some powder dry for potential M&A, or do you kind of feel like M&A is less likely with higher marks given where the 10 years moved?
spk02: We're going to be picking back up our buybacks a little bit more in Q2. We did start a little bit in earlier part of Q1, but it's kind of a balancing act of, one, keeping the powder dry, and, two, buying back at the levels that our stock is trading at today.
spk06: Okay. One other point in that regard, we had kind of pulled off of the buybacks. We were engaged in a potential purchase of some branch locations from another bank, and that was very much in line to be announced yesterday, and unfortunately another bank came in and what we felt was a little bit on the high side price-wise. But anyway, the seller basically reneged on us three days before closing and took another bank. So that was one of the reasons that we stopped the buybacks about 60 days ago for the most part.
spk03: Okay. That's helpful. And then just lastly, any comments on it? I think If I have this right, you still want to migrate the loan-to-deposit ratio a little lower. How do you fund the loan growth from here? Is it CDs? It's good to see the DDA was kind of stable this quarter. Any thoughts on how you fund growth?
spk06: Well, I think our focus completely is on C&I customers, and with that comes their deposit relationship. We're trying to get away right now from non-occupied CRE just from the standpoint that it doesn't bring the deposits. So bringing the whole customer is extremely important to us, and that's going to help us maintain the DDA level that we have acquired and or attained up until this year. So even though some of those balances moved when rates started going up into CDs, we still are ahead of where we were pre-pandemic as a percent of total deposits and DDAs and savings accounts. So we're going to continue to drive the CNI portfolio much more so than anything else. That'll help with that deposit mix. We'd love to get that down to, you know, 92, 93, something like that.
spk03: Okay. Appreciate all the color, guys. Thank you, Brad.
spk00: Again, if you have a question, please press star, then one. Your next question comes from Joseph Yachuni with Raymond James. Please go ahead.
spk04: Hi there.
spk05: Hi, Joe. How are you doing?
spk04: I'm doing well. So I'm going to start with kind of, it sounds like the cost of interest-bearing deposits may have peaked kind of based on what you said earlier. So if we assume the forward curve, do you have a sense for how deposit basis will behave when the Fed starts cutting rates?
spk02: So I don't want to use the word peak because I still think that it's going to continue to drift up a little bit, but just at a much slower pace. So there is still some low-hanging fruit out there. So there's still going to be some upward migration in deposit costs, but it's slowing. It's coming down pretty quick. The pace of increase is slowing. As far as the deposit betas, when rates start ticking down, I think a lot of banks are going to be, one, anxious to lower rates, but a lot of loan and deposit ratios are not where banks want to be, and customers are getting used to five handles on their CDs, which will force those customers to be a little bit – shop a lot more. So I think a 25 or 50 basis point rate cut is going to – the beta is eventually going to work its way out to a normalized beta. I think it might take a little bit longer to play out as customers continue to fight for higher rates.
spk04: I appreciate that. And – You know, the Houston market continues to generate strong loan growth. So with 18% of loans being in Texas, do you have a medium-term target for how large you'd like to grow that portfolio?
spk06: No, we do not. We think it's a tremendous market, and the people that we have there, including the new group that we pulled out in the fourth quarter, are doing a great job of staying in the arena that we want to play in. I know a lot of banks complain about going to Texas and you have to play big to get anything. We're not seeing that. The talent that we have there is keeping it in the type of portfolio, type of loans that we're searching for and doing a very good job and doing it at a high volume. We're very excited about what's going on there. Unfortunately, we didn't get the the M&A deal that we wanted to help us expand in the Houston market, but I'm sure there'll be other opportunities in that market to come.
spk04: Okay, and then last one from me here. So we've heard from a lot of banks, this earnings call that, you know, their outlooks call for an acceleration in loan growth throughout 2024, but kind of based on your reiterated outlook, it seems like for it to reach the high end of your guide, that loan growth would remain stable? Do you have a sense for why there's a disconnect there?
spk06: No, I really don't. I think we probably wouldn't be so optimistic without our Houston franchise. Things are slowing a little bit more in Louisiana than they are in Texas. But I do believe every market is slowing to some degree, but Texas is keeping its prop up. So that's the only explanation I can find.
spk04: Okay, great. Well, thank you for taking my questions.
spk05: Thank you, Joe. Have a good one.
spk00: This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to John Borderland for any closing remarks.
spk06: Once again, thank you all for joining us today. We look forward to speaking to many of you in the coming days and weeks. Thank you for your interest in Home Bank Warp. Hope you have a wonderful day.
spk00: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer