This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk03: Good afternoon. Thank you for attending today's Halador Energy second quarter 2024 conference call. My name is Cole and I'll be the moderator for today's call. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. If you'd like to queue for a question, you can do so by pressing star one on your telephone keypad. I'd now like to pass the call over to Sean Mansoury, the company's investor relations advisor with Elevate IR. Please go ahead.
spk02: Thank you and good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you joining us to discuss our second quarter 2024 results. With me today are President and CEO Brent Bilsland and CFO Margie Hargrave. This afternoon, we released our second quarter 2024 financial and operating results in a press release that is now on the Halador investor relations website. Today, we will discuss those results as well as our perspective on current market conditions and our outlook for 2024. Following prepared remarks, we will open the call to answer your questions. Before beginning, a reminder that some of our remarks today may include forward-looking statements subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions contained in our filings from the SEC and are also reflected in today's press release. While these forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us, if one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or if our underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those we projected or expected. In providing these remarks, Halador has no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, unless required by law to do so. We plan on filing our Form 10-Q later this week. And with the preliminaries out of the way, I'll turn the call over to President and CEO Brent Bilsland. Brent?
spk05: Thanks, Sean. At Halador, we've been undergoing a strategic and deliberate transformation process to capture increased value from our products and services as the company advances up the value chain. To accomplish this, we have focused on expanding our offerings from fuel production to wholesale electricity sales to ultimately empowering the industrial end user. The acquisition of our Merrim Power Plant less than two years ago was the first step in this journey, enabling us the ability to transform our fuel into higher value wholesale electricity. We took another step forward earlier this year when we signed a memorandum of understanding with Hoosier Energy and Wynn REMC, creating a pathway to further increase value and drive margin expansion by enabling sales of wholesale electricity to industrial users of power. We have recently carried out a data center targeted request for proposal that has received a strong response. Our active negotiations on that RFP further strengthen our conviction that power is in critical demand and that we possess a crucial component to the success of these data centers. While we are encouraged by our progress with our counterparties, we caution that these negotiations are ongoing and take time given the potential magnitude for both our partners and our company. Nearly all of these proposed transactions would involve sales of large amounts of our energy and capacity for well over a decade. The state of Indiana, where our power plant is located, continues to solidify its position as a developing hub for high-tech and high-growth sectors. The Indiana Economic Development Corporation reports that plans for nearly $15 billion of new investments in Indiana's technological infrastructure have been announced by Fortune 500 businesses thus far in 2024, underscoring the growth potential in our marketplace. Businesses need power to enable them to build in Indiana, and Howlidor is one of the few companies that hasn't. We believe we are entering a unique time of electricity scarcity. We have heard multiple reports from across the country where utilities have told industrial customers they cannot timely provide them with power needed to support their growth. We have seen numerous companies reference the lack of available power as restricting their company plans. Last week, the results of the PJM capacity auction, a neighboring market to the MISO system where we operate, had certain zones where capacity prices traded up to the legal limit. As much as nine times more than the previous year. This result supports our belief that the value of dispatchable generation, like our Miram plant, continues to increase. Energy scarcity is leading to higher long-term power prices, as evidenced by significantly higher energy prices starting in 2026, as contracted by Howlidor and forecasted by the forward energy curve. I would also like to point to a recent Wall Street Journal article, reporting that heavy industrial users of power, such as aluminum smelters, are struggling to compete for electricity with higher value users of energy, such as data centers. According to the article, in the year 2000, there were 23 aluminum smelters located in the United States. Today, there are only four. During the quarter, we added $45 million in forward energy sales, bringing our forward capacity and energy sales book to $664 million as of June 30th. When combined with our forward fuel sales, our total forward sales book at June 30th totaled approximately $1.4 billion. Unfortunately, the recent environment for spot electricity sales has been challenging. This past winter, record high U.S. natural gas production ran into the ninth warmest winter on record, according to NOAA. The lack of winter heating demand contributed to gas inventory levels climbing as much as 38 percent above the five-year average. As gas prices addressed downward, wholesale electricity prices also declined. In the first half of the quarter, we added approximately 90 percent of the off-peak energy hours at the Miram Hub and approximately 60 percent of the total energy hours at the Miram Hub, priced below our production cost at our Miram facility. Our goal is for Halador Power to generate approximately 1.5 million megawatt hours on a quarterly basis, which equates to approximately 1.6 million megawatt hours annually. During the first half of 2024, Halador Power generated approximately 1.6 million megawatt hours during the first half of the year. We experienced sales prices of nearly $261 per megawatt hour for limited times, balanced against most days pricing below our variable cost to produce. These fluctuations led to an inconsistent dispatch schedule. We also performed 70 days of scheduled outages on half the plant during the first half of the year. We believe the environment will be better in the last half of this year to see higher dispatch rates as we have no scheduled outages planned for the plant for the year. Additionally, our plant already ran 437,000 megawatt hours for the month of July. Gas inventory levels have also improved from 38 percent above the five-year average in March to 16 percent above the five-year average at the end of July. For the first half of 2024, lower energy prices negatively affect both Halador Power Company's generation model and the dispatch rates of Sunrise Coal's utility customers. In response to dispatching less, those customers slowed coal shipments from Sunrise during the first half of this year. To match Sunrise's production levels and cost structure to that of market demands, we restructured Sunrise's operations in the first quarter of 2024. As we have previously noted, the restructuring included a reduction in force of approximately 110 people in February. We have since allowed attrition to further reduce our workforce by approximately 130 additional people, a total workforce reduction of more than 25 percent as of June 30. We also restructured our operations to focus on our more profitable units and to aisle units with higher production costs. Transitioning our Oaktown mining facilities from seven units of production to four units of production was a deliberate process which took considerable time and effort and was completed in mid-July. We are encouraged by the early results of Sunrise's restructuring and have seen improvement in mining costs since we made the decision to adjust our operations. Our clean tons per foot of advancement, a key efficiency metric we utilize, improved from January to June by 27 percent. And our June cash costs at Oaktown were approximately $44 a ton, while our cash costs for the quarter were approximately 50. We expect to continue driving improvements in cash costs in the second half of the year as we have already implemented further operational improvements in the month of July. It's worth noting that you will not find these cash cost numbers in our upcoming 10Q filing as we have revised the presentation of our financials to conform with GAAP. Overall, we're enthusiastic about Howard's prospect for significant growth and value creation. The improving energy market landscape provides a solid foundation to return to growth as we exit 2024 and we believe the surge in demand to power data centers and other industrial users provide the real opportunity to transform our financial profile over the long run. I will now hand the call over to Margie Hargrave before opening Q&A and returning for closing remarks.
spk01: Thank you very much, Brent, and good afternoon, everyone. Turning to our second quarter financials, electric sales for the quarter were $56.8 million compared to $71 million in the prior year period. The decline was primarily due to an abundant natural gas supply, leading to low energy prices. This, coupled with the mild winter and scheduled maintenance, resulted in our dispatch rates being decreased. Coal sales were $32.8 million for the quarter compared to $88.6 million in the prior year period. This decline was driven by our decision to reduce our coal production as previously discussed in our restructuring of our sunrise coal division. Additionally, a slowdown customer deliveries coincided with a decrease in coal plant output throughout the quarter. These two segments drove revenue of $90.9 million for the quarter compared to $161.2 million in the prior year period. Net loss for the quarter was $10.2 million compared to positive net income of $16.9 million in the prior year period. This was largely driven by a loss in coal operations of $13.33 per ton, due to a reduction in contract average sales price and reduced demand given the oversupply of lower priced natural gas and reduced dispatch rates at our customer's coal-fired power plants. We improved operating cash flow to $23.5 million for the quarter compared to $18.1 million in the prior year period. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, which is reconciled in our earnings press release issued earlier today, was $5.6 million for Q2 compared to $35.3 million in the second quarter, bringing total -to-day capbacks to $28 million. This puts us well on target for our planned capital outlay of $43 million for calendar year 2024. In response to the current environment, we focused on strengthening our balance sheet. During the second quarter, we decreased our bank debt by $31.5 million. This decrease in bank debt contributed to our 41% increase in total debt from $141 million as of December 31, 2023 to $83 million as of June 30, 2024. We also repaid $5 million of unsecured one-year notes from related parties affiliated with our board of directors that were issued during the first quarter of 2024. Utilizing our PPM offering, we raised $27.9 million by issuing $3.9 million shares of our common stock during the quarter. We also successfully converted our remaining $11 million of senior unsecured convertible notes, including accrued interest with $2.1 million shares of our company's common stock. Taken together, as of June 30, 2024, our bank debt was $45.5 million. Total liquidity improved to $60.7 million, and our leverage ratio was 2.12 times. These improvements were supported by a $43 million prepayment for an 11-month forward energy sale, representing approximately 22% of our annual $6 million megawatt-hour goal during the term of the contract. Through these strategic actions to bolster our balance sheet, we have established a solid foundation to carry us through the challenges of the near-term environment and position HALADOR for significant growth and margin expansion in the years ahead. That concludes our prepared remarks. We will now open up the call for questions. Thank you.
spk03: If you would like to queue for a question, you can do so by pressing star 1 on your telephone keypad. If for any reason you would like to remove your question, please press star 2. Again, to join the question queue, please press star 1. Our first question is from Lucas Pipes with B. Riley. Your line is now open. Thank you very
spk04: much, Operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Brent, my first question is on the bilateral power agreements with data centers that you mentioned. I wonder if you could maybe speak a little bit to the type of organizations that have shown interest. How mature are they? What's the size? Also, what do you screen for from those potential customers? Are you looking for the best price? Are you looking for a specific credit profile? I would appreciate your thoughts on that. Thank you.
spk05: Great question. We're talking to several different partners or potential customers. They can range from investor-owned utilities, cooperatives, co-hosting data center developers. Those are the type of counterparties that we're looking at. As we said in the prepared remarks, we anticipate all of these counter parties are trying to figure how to build data centers as fast as they can. They are looking at a major capital investment and they need power for a long period of time. They don't want to build these things and then find they can't get power in the second or third year. As we said in the prepared remarks, we think that this will be a sale of the majority of our energy and capacity and for a period of time that exceeds a decade in length. That gives you the scale of this will be, if we're successful, this will be a major transaction transformational to the company. These deals aren't done and they take a long time to negotiate because there's big dollars and a construction project typically on the other side of it. What are we looking for? We're looking for a counterparty that has very good credit. We want to know if they're going to be there at the end of this contract, not just at the beginning. And so price, likelihood of can we actually transact with the counterparty and will their credit survive the test of time? Those are probably the three biggest attributes that we're taking into consideration.
spk04: Thank you, Brent. You mentioned that these things can take a while. Any color in terms of how long it could take from here? I know you just mentioned there's a lot of wood to chop, but any perspective you could add that would be appreciated. Thank you.
spk05: Well, that's a great question too. We only control one side of the negotiation and oftentimes in the negotiation you have three parties. You have ourselves, the wholesaler of power, capacity. You have someone like a Hoosier that has the right to sell industrial power that we have an MOU to potentially sell through. And then you have the end user. And so because there are three different groups typically to the transaction, the crystal ball of how long this all takes is a little more opaque. So what does it feel like? It feels like somewhere near the end of the year or Q1 of next year. That's what it feels like.
spk04: But I appreciate that. Really helpful. Thank you for taking a stab. I appreciate this uncertainty in different parties. One other question from me just in terms of kind of looking out to the second half of 2024 in the context of the first half performance. Obviously power pricing has been softer. I thought you mentioned 1.6 million megawatt hours sold in the first half. But for the second half, where do you think that number should shake out? You mentioned somewhat higher, I think July utilization rates, but gas prices are super weak. If you had to point to specific, if you had to point to a range for generation, I would appreciate your thoughts on that.
spk05: Thank you. Well, the market has improved from the standpoint of, in March we had gas inventory levels that were 38% above the five-year average. That's just a staggering amount of gas that was sent around in storage. And so the market, gas price down, we believe to incentivize, it's used. And so what's happening is you have higher heat rate plants dispatching in front of coal plants because we have such just incredibly cheap gas. People tend to look at Henry Hub and the IMX pricing, but really Chicago City Gate is probably a better indicator for us. And it's been a discount even to those markets. So a lot of -$2 gas in the first half of the year. So the inventory levels have improved. So at the end of July here, I think the 26th was the last report, inventory levels had come down by 22% to 16%. Inventory levels were 16% above the five-year average. So we still have a lot of gas, but we're a lot better positioned than we were at the beginning of the year. The other thing is this, we're in the summer months. So we had good heating demand in July. We should have decent heating demand in December. It's hard to say what the balance of the year will break. We should see cooling demand again sometime around Thanksgiving. So when we look at the period of time we have left, we don't have any scheduled outages, whereas in the first half of the year, half of our plant was offline for 70 days. Now part of that was one unit, part of that was the second unit, so it wasn't like it was one unit. But when you combine those, there were 70 days and only had half the plant available to us. No scheduled outages in the back half of the year. So if market prices call for that plant to run, it will run. We did 1.6 million megawatt hours roughly in the first half of the year. We've already exceeded 25% of that in July alone. So the market will be better. We should run more. And if you look at the price of gas when you get to December, it's above $3. So at those prices, not only do we dispatch more, we should start to see higher margins, higher gross margins when we run the plant. So more widgets, greater margins. And that's what we say when we think that we'll see, finish the year strong and start to return to much more profitable times than we've seen in the first half of the year.
spk04: Thank you very much, Brent. I really appreciate it all. I'll turn it over for now. Continue best of luck.
spk03: Thank you. As an additional reminder, it is star one to join the question queue. There are no additional questions at this time, so I'll pass the call back to the management team for any closing remarks.
spk05: Yeah, I want to thank everyone for taking the time today to tune into our earnings call. I want to thank our management team and thank everyone for their interest in Alidor. Thank you.
spk03: That concludes today's call. Thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.
Disclaimer