This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk04: are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, we'll need to press star 1-1 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 1-1 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Rafer Garabrant, head of investor relations. Please go ahead.
spk06: Good morning to everyone and welcome to InterDigital's first quarter 2024 earnings conference call. I am Rafer Garabrant, head of investor relations for InterDigital. With me on today's call are Liran Chen, our president and CEO, and Rich Bresky, our CFO. Consistent with prior calls, we will offer some highlights about the quarter and the company, and then open up the call for questions. For additional details, you can access our earnings release and slide presentation that accompany this call on our investor relations website. Before we begin our remarks, I need to remind you that in this call, we will make forward-looking statements regarding our current beliefs, plans, and expectations, which are not guarantees of future performance and are made only as of the date hereof. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from results and events contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include those described in the risk factor section of our 2023 annual report on Form 10K and in our other SEC filings. In addition, today's presentation may contain references to non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in the supplemental materials posted to the investor relations section of our website. With that taken care of, I will turn the call over to Liren.
spk08: Thank you, Riefer. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. On our last call, we provided annual guidance for 2020 for revenue of between $620 million and $670 million. This guidance highlights the increasing momentum of our business and the multiple growth opportunity that we have identified and expect to achieve through the rest of the year. Today, I'm pleased to share that we have made significant headway in achieving our goal and reconfirm our 2024 annual guidance. Revenue for the first quarter was $264 million, up by 30% -over-year and above the high end of our guidance. Our Q1 revenue was one of the highest in our history and an all-time high for our CE and IoT licensing program. Through the quarter, we have made great progress on multiple fronts of our business. We signed seven new license agreements. We enhanced our position as a leader in the application of AI in both wireless and video, and we received several positive court decisions, which we believe will help us to advance negotiations with certain unlicensed smartphone OEMs. We begin the quarter with a new landmark license with Samsung TV Business. The agreement covers patents and our joint licensing program with Sony and introduce our own patent across a range of video and Wi-Fi technologies. Samsung is a market leader in TV, and this agreement highlights both the value of video and Wi-Fi innovation and the goals we continue to build in licensing the consumer electronics sector. I want to emphasize that this new agreement is separate to the Samsung smartphone license. We announced at the start of 2023 that Samsung and Interdigital has agreed to renew the license for their Smart TV to our portfolio. The final term of the smartphone license include how much sense on mass payoffs are still the subject of an arbitration hearing, which is on track to be held this summer with a final resolution expected by end of this year. The seven new agreements that we signed in the first quarter reflect the momentum we continue to see across all our licensing programs and our strengths in consumer electronics and IoT in particular. The revenue and recurring revenue in Q1 from our CE and IoT program were both record highs. With Samsung and other agreements that we close in the quarter, we have increased the cumulative value of contracts that we have signed over the last three years to almost $2.7 billion, giving us an incredible strong base from which to drive new long-term agreements and pursue additional growth opportunities. Staying on license, we are making significant progress in our effort to ensure that we receive fair compensation for our innovation from unlicensed smartphone OEMs. Earlier today, a German court issued a very positive decision for us in our dispute with Lenovo. The court ruled that Lenovo infringed one of our 4G and 5G standard essential patents that Interdigital has acted in a friend manner, that Lenovo is an unweighting licensee who engaged in holdout and should therefore be enjoined in the German market. The injunction means that Lenovo will be prohibited from setting 4G and 5G compatible devices in Germany. Also, as part of our dispute with OPPO, a German court also ruled that OPPO infringed Interdigital's 4G and 5G standard essential patent in suit, that Interdigital has acted in a friend manner, that OPPO is an unweighting licensee, the court also awarded injunction against OPPO. In India, in another trial against OPPO, we received yet another positive decision, but OPPO was ordered to pay royalties in the form of a security deposit to the court. The Indian court also heavily criticized and fined OPPO for stealing tactics during our negotiations and ordered that the trial be concluded before end of the year. We are encouraged by this recent development in our cases, and we believe we have built significant momentum in our negotiations with both companies. As I have said many times before, we always prefer to sign a long-term license through amicable negotiations, but we are ready to enforce our patent rights if necessary. Our strengths as a fundamental innovator in critical technology continue to underpin our progress. Our research team has long been recognized as world leaders in the development of wireless and video technology, and increasingly our leadership in AI is coming to the forefront. In Q1, one of our senior engineers was appointed to head the AI and Machine Learning Standing Committee of IEEE, the standard development organization which leads the evolution of Wi-Fi. At this year's Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, we showcased two demonstrations which had AI at their heart. One was in partnership with K-Sites, which use a neural network developed by our engineers to demonstrate the application of AI in a 6G network. And a second combined advanced video compression and AI to significantly reduce energy consumption of streaming video while preserving picture quality. Also at MWC, we demonstrated cutting edge immersive video and haptic technology in a specific use case of e-sports and showed our increasing leadership in integrated sensing and communication and emerging technology which will be a pillar of 6G. Our research success continue to be reflected in the development of our global pattern portfolio. Recently, we were confirmed among the top 25 companies globally that filed the most new pattern applications with European pattern office last year. Our number of new applications filed with EPO increased by 40% year over year in a clear indication of our success in translating our foundational innovation into pattern assets. The strength of innovation and pattern footprint give us an excellent platform to drive further growth in our existing licensing program and in green field opportunity such as cloud-based video services. And with our track record for delivering new license agreement with leading manufacturers such as Samsung, we believe we are in excellent position to reach our financial target for the year. With that, I'll hand it over to Rich to talk you through the numbers in more details.
spk07: Thanks, Liren. Q1 was another outstanding quarter for Interdigital as our strong revenue growth drove both non-GAAP EPS and adjusted EBITDA to the high end of our guidance range. This growth was powered by new licensing agreements, most notably Samsung TV. These results support our long-term objective of delivering consistent revenue growth combined with strong margins. Total revenue increased 30% year over year with CE and IoT leading the way. Based on new licensing agreements reached in Q1, recurring revenue for CE and IoT reached an annualized run rate of almost $90 million, an increase of 57% year over year and has roughly doubled over the last two years. When combined with catch-up revenue of 160 million, CE and IoT total revenue for the quarter reached an all-time high at 183 million. This performance highlights our ability to deliver significant growth beyond the smartphone market. Our adjusted EBITDA for the quarter of $130 million equates to an adjusted EBITDA margin close to 50% consistent with our guidance. These results demonstrate the power of our business model. Our investments in fundamental technologies drive top-line growth, while the reuse of those technologies across multiple verticals delivers high margins and drives cash flow. Our strong performance in Q1 produced cash from operations of $51 million and free cash flow of $41 million. This strong cash flow, combined with a cash balance of nearly $1 billion, supports our continued return of capital to shareholders. In Q1, we repurchased approximately 300,000 shares for $29 million. We repurchased another 200,000 shares in April for a -to-date total of roughly half a million shares. Since we first paid our dividend in 2011, we have now returned approximately $1.8 billion to shareholders through share buybacks and dividends. In that time, we reduced our outstanding share count by almost 45% from more than 45 million shares to just over 25 million shares. And with $246 million left on the current buyback authorization, we're not done yet. Looking forward to Q2, we expect recurring revenue will include $93 to $97 million of revenue from existing contracts, plus any amounts we recognize from any new agreements we may sign over the balance of the quarter. Based only on existing contracts, we expect an adjusted EBITDA margin of about 38% and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of 70 to 80 cents. Any additional agreements would be additive to those totals. Our strong first quarter results have us on track to meet our full year 2024 targets, and we are reaffirming our prior guidance of revenue in the range of $620 to $670 million. We continue to expect an adjusted EBITDA margin of roughly 50% for the full year 2024 and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $7.45 to $8.76. Before I conclude, I'd like to mention that we'll be attending four conferences over the remainder of the second quarter, the Bank of America Global Tech Conference in San Francisco on June 4th, the William Blair Growth Stock Conference in Chicago on June 4th, the Ideas Investor Conference in New York on June 12th, and the Roth 10th Annual London Conference on June 26th and 27th. Please check with your representatives at those firms if you'd like to schedule a meeting. With that, I'll turn it back to Rayford.
spk06: Thanks, Rich. At this point, operator, we are ready to take questions.
spk04: Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star one one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. We ask that you please limit your questions to one question and one follow-up. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster.
spk05: Our first question comes from Arjun Bhatia
spk04: of William Blair.
spk01: All right, thank you, guys. Appreciate you taking the question. To start, Leran, maybe a couple questions on the Samsung side, more on the smartphone side, not necessarily on the TV side, but as you think about just going through arbitration here over the summer and looking at a potential outcome later this year, how should we think about maybe the range of outcomes that you're considering that could result from that arbitration? I mean, is there a possibility that prices are going up and maybe how do you, or your royalty rate is going up, and how do you handicap that? And then for Rich, the same thing on the Samsung smartphone side, can you just remind us how you're accounting for the license revenue in the recurring line from Samsung thus far, and might that be something that's contributing to the decline in smartphone recurring revenue? Thank you.
spk08: Hey, good morning, Arjun. Thanks for the question. So on the Samsung smartphone arbitration, as we have discussed in the prior call, Samsung has been a customer for the smartphone side for actually a long time, since 1995, and before they released the very first Galaxy phone. The last contract was a 10-year agreement, which covered frankly the previous generation technology and not including very valuable assets like 5G and a lot of the advanced video technology we have done. So that agreement expired December 31st of 2022, and both parties have agreed through negotiations that they will renew the agreement without disruption, and that we frankly couldn't get pricing agreed upon in time, so we both agreed to do a binding arbitration that started January 1st of 2023, and we are frankly well into the process. The panel has been assembled, and the hearing has been confirmed this summer, and will be decided before the end of the year as a current projection. So regarding valuation for multiple reasons, we feel very confident that the value of portfolio has gone up, that Samsung has benefited more through the years compared to the time of the last agreement, so that obviously we still need to have the arbitration to go through to confirm our belief, and I'll hand it over to Rich to comment on the revenue recognition side.
spk07: Yeah, thanks, Laren. Yeah, on the RevRec, we've been recognizing since the first quarter of last year at level with the prior Samsung agreement, which is just shy of $80 million a year. That's what we believe is a conservative estimate. We have effectively a license in place with Samsung, and we're just estimating what the ultimate outcome will be on a conservative basis, but because of the conservative nature of the gap requirement, we're certainly hopeful that we'll have a positive true up when it's ultimately concluded. And as to the question on the decline in recurring revenue, I presume you mean 23 going into 24. So based on what I just said, it's not because of Samsung, but rather expiration of other agreements, most notably Huawei, which expired the end of last year. And of course, we're working to...
spk01: Yep, perfect, all right, thank you, Rich. One more, if I can, it was interesting to hear the injunctions against Lenovo and Oppo, and I'm curious, in the past, Laren, to the extent you have experience with these injunctions, how do you think they, or how have they maybe changed behavior of some of these manufacturers in the past? I mean, is it enough of an incentive to bring them to the negotiation table and say, hey, we want to strike a deal? Like how punitive can those injunctions be for these companies to get them to strike a deal with you?
spk08: Yeah, hey, Arjun. As we announced in a separate press this morning, the court in Munich has issued a decision. In that decision, basically the court decided that Interdigital has consistently acted in good faith under the front obligation at all times. The court also said Lenovo has systematically acted in holdout, and frankly, it's not in compliance of the front obligation. So as a result, the court has issued the injunction of a patent that's standard essential for both 4G and 5G. And unless something happens, Lenovo will be prohibited from setting devices with those features in German market. Regarding how the company may behave, I don't want to spec on Lenovo, how they will proceed from here. All I can say is Germany is obviously a very major market, and this injunction applies to a pretty wide range of devices actually beyond just cell phones. So I hope with this decision that Lenovo will come back and frankly take a license and a grant and for terms from us, and
spk05: I'm definitely hopeful. All right, perfect, appreciate the color, thank you. Thank you, one moment for next question. Thank you. And our next question comes from Anya
spk04: Soderstrom of Sudodi. Your line is open.
spk03: Hi, thank you for taking my question. Can you just, you talked about this in the past, but maybe go over again the different opportunities you have to reach your guidance for 2024.
spk08: Yeah, hey, good morning, Anya. This is Lern. So we have multiple passes. On the smartphone side, just for example, we have OPPO negotiation, we have Weibo, as Rich just mentioned here, Huawei has expired, which we are bringing a renewed discussion with them. And then Lenovo was licensed through the UK court decision for the cellular side until end of last year. Now they are unlicensed. As we announced this morning, we received court injunctions and we hope to be able to frankly sign a long-term agreement with them. So that's just on the smartphone side. On the CE side, as we mentioned in the preparatory mark, we signed with Samsung TV, which is the largest vendor in TV space. We are working diligently on the next multiple layers of TV vendors, include LG, TCL, and Hisense. So on top of all the stuff here, we are also working on the Samsung arbitration and we expect that to be finished before end of the year. And if we are able to get a favorable judgment beyond the revenue recognition, there will be a positive, true proposal.
spk03: Okay, thank you. And then, Councillor Huawei, how constructive were those discussions given you fairly recently, signing an agreement with them?
spk08: Yeah, Huawei negotiations proceeding according to plan. And our last agreement expired end of the year. And frankly, Huawei's business has gone through certain amount of period of up and downs. So we are currently in negotiation with them and we are hopeful we'll get a long-term deal done with them.
spk05: Okay,
spk03: thank you. That was
spk05: all for me. Thank you. One moment for next question. Our next question comes
spk04: from Scott Sherrill of Roth MKM. Your line is open.
spk02: Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. I apologize in advance, I was on the call late, so if you've already covered this, but, Laryn, in regard to the Lenovo injunction, what is the actual process and procedure there in terms of how that's gonna be implemented? And are there additional costs associated with it? I believe that there's an appeal period from their standpoint. So could you walk us through the milestones, timeline, and the cost element?
spk08: Yes, hey Scott, good morning. So we have, I'm not certain you were on the call when we were describing it earlier. So basically the court has decided that we have acted in friend manner consistently all the time. The Lenovo has systematic conduct a holdout and they are not in friend obligation and they are frankly on waiting licensee. As a result, the court has issued an injunction against them that covers devices with 4G and 5G features built in. So there will be some procedure stuff which we are frankly working through and our intention is to enforce this injunction as quickly as we can. And you're also correct, this is a, what they call first incident decision, which is automatically appealable. So I don't want to speculate on the Lenovo's legal strategy, but that's frankly up to them.
spk02: Gotcha, and Leran, just to quickly follow up on that front, this is in Germany, will that extend to the rest of the EU or what is the plan there in terms of how you implement across at the pan-European marketplace?
spk08: Yeah, Scott, this is a case that's, this is a German patent and it's a German court. So the decision will be limited to the German market. As you all were Scott, we do have other cases including our case in ITC in US against them in different technology area. So, but these particular decisions Germany only.
spk02: Gotcha, and two others, if I could, just the latest update in terms of video IPs licensing into the streaming and services model, are there any updated thoughts, timelines in terms of how that's evolving and the impact in 24 and 25?
spk08: Yeah, hey Scott, we do view the radio cloud service licensing as a very, very good greenfield opportunity. We are proceeding according to plan, which we believe have very valuable IP assets and frankly, very strong technology leadership. Regarding direct financial impact, but as of now we are not projecting material impact to 2024 and if we have more updates, we will share with you our timeline. Gotcha,
spk02: and lastly, if I could, you've maintained the guidance range for the year of 620 to 670. I'm wondering if some things have kind of moved around in terms of higher probability versus lower probability. I'm not sure if you can address it, but just kind of, I know there are multiple paths to get to that range if there are certain things that have materialized and become a little bit more confident about, thanks.
spk08: Yeah, hey Scott, as I said in my prepared remarks, when we issue the guidance beginning of the year, we feel very strongly that our business momentum has increased and we have identified multiple paths to reach that result. And now we have delivered frankly, a resounding strong quarter in Q1, for both the top line as well as adjusted EPS and especially in the record-breaking C and R key space. So we feel very good about where we are and we are on track to deliver the result. And as of now, we are not trying to predict the rest of the quarter. And other than we feel very confident about our ability to deliver for the year.
spk02: Great, thank you.
spk04: Thank you, this concludes the question and answer session. At this time, I'd like to turn it back to Liren Chen for closing remarks.
spk08: Thank you, operator. Before we close, I'd like to thank our employees for their dedication and contribution to Interdigital, as well as our many partners and licensees for outstanding start to 2024. Thanks to everyone who joined our call today and we look forward to updating you in our progress next quarter.
spk04: This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating and you may now disconnect.
Disclaimer