This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
5/8/2024
Good morning and welcome to the ICON Enterprise's LP's first quarter 2024 earnings conference call with Andrew Tino, President and Chief Executive Officer, Ted Papapostolo, Chief Financial Officer and Robert Flint, Chief Accounting Officer. I would now like to hand the call over to Robert Flint who
will read the opening statement. Thank you, operator.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements that we make in this presentation, including statements regarding our future performance and plans for our businesses and potential acquisitions. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, will, or words of similar meaning and include, but are not limited to, statements about the expected future business and financial performance of ICON Enterprise's LP and its subsidiaries. Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from our expectations due to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including economic, competitive, legal and other factors. Accordingly, there is no assurance that our expectations will be realized. We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements should circumstances change except as otherwise required by law. This presentation also includes certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted EBITDA. A reconciliation of such non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the back of this presentation. We also present indicative net asset value. Indicative net asset value includes, among other things, changes in the fair value of certain subsidiaries, which are not included in our GAAP earnings. All net income and EBITDA amounts we will discuss are attributable to ICON Enterprise's unless otherwise specified. I'll now turn it over to Andrew Tino, our Chief Executive Officer.
Thank you, Rob. I will provide a brief overview of Q1 results, and then we will be available for questions. First quarter net loss was $38 million, an improvement of $232 million over Q1 of 2023. First quarter adjusted EBITDA was $134 million, an increase of $39 million compared to Q1 2023. Indicative net asset value ended the quarter at approximately $5 billion, up $194 million from the prior quarter. In terms of our controlled businesses, CVI has benefited from lower RIN's expense, offset by wider than usual refined product basis. We believe there are opportunities swirling in the refining space, and it'll be disciplined to see if we can find something accretive and attractive. The auto service division is working on several key initiatives to drive earnings and cash flow. Ones of particular note include product sourcing and inventory reduction. Regarding our automotive owned real estate, we are making solid strides with our transformation plans. We have added key personnel to the team to further optimize the real estate portfolio and the auto service business through leasing, green fields, store optimizations, and out parcel development. This quarter, the investment funds had a negative return of 0.8%, primarily driven by energy sector and broad market shorts. If you were to subtract out the impact of our energy shorts, which offset our refining exposure, our returns would have been a positive .8% for the quarter. One particular contributor to performance was Southwest Gas Holdings, which increased in value through increased utility profitability in the impact of the recently completed Century IPO. We believe that Century and another one of our long positions, AEP, are beneficiaries of the need for investment in the grid and additional generation to support growing AI-related data center demand. Our headline net short exposure of 27% is a net long exposure of 7% when you adjust for the energy hedges. This compares to net short exposure of 6% as of year end, excluding the energy hedges. As you can see, we continue our recent trend of getting slightly more net long and focusing on our activist efforts. Additionally, the board approved a $1 quarterly distribution per depository unit, which is consistent with last quarter. With that, let me turn it over to Ted for a detailed discussion of all of our segments.
Thank you, Andrew. I will begin by reviewing the performance of our segments and comment on the strength of our balance sheet. Turning to our investment segment. The funds had a negative return of .8% for the quarter. Long and other positions had a positive performance attribution of 12.6%, while short positions had a negative performance attribution of 13.4%. The holding company's interest in the funds was approximately 3.2 billion as of quarter end. And now turning to our energy segment. Energy segments EBITDA was 118 million for Q124 compared to 229 million for Q123. Q124 refining margin per throughput barrel was $16.29 compared to $23.24 in the prior year quarter. This decrease is primarily driven by lower crack spreads offset in part by reduced RFS expenses, expenses and favorable RIN revaluation. Q124 average realized gain prices for UAN decreased by 42% to $267 per ton, and ammonia decreased by 41% to $528 per ton when compared to the prior year quarter. CVI declared a first quarter cash dividend of 50 cents per share. And now turning to our automotive segment. Net sales and other revenues decreased by 73 million compared to Q123, primarily driven by the deconsolidation of Auto Plus during the prior year quarter, as well as reduced car count for the automotive service business. Adjusted EBITDA improved 2 million for Q124 compared to Q123. Automotive service was able to maintain adjusted EBITDA through cost cutting and margin initiatives, which offset reduced car count. And turning to our real estate segment. Q124 net sales and other revenues decreased by 5 million and adjusted EBITDA decreased by 2 million compared to the prior year quarter, primarily driven by reduced sales of single-family homes. And turning to our other operating segment. Food packaging adjusted EBITDA decreased by 4 million for Q124 as compared to the prior year quarter, driven by lower volumes due to softening demand. Home fashions adjusted EBITDA increased by 1 million as compared to the prior year quarter, mainly due to margin improvement offset by lower sales. Farmless segments adjusted EBITDA for Q124 improved by 5 million as compared to the prior year quarter, mainly due to higher sales and lower operating expenses. And turning to our liquidity. We maintain liquidity at the holding company and at each of our operating subsidiaries to take advantage of attractive opportunities. As of quarter end, the holding company had cash and investment in the funds of 4.9 billion and our subsidiaries had cash and revolver availability of 1.1 billion. In summary, we continue to focus on building asset value and maintaining liquidity to enable us to capitalize on opportunities within and outside our existing operating segments. Thank you. Operator, can you please open the call up for questions?
Thank you. To ask a question, you'll need to press star one one on your telephone. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. Please be advised that the conference is being recorded. Again, we ask that you please stand by while we compile a Q&A roster. One moment for our first question,
please. Our first question comes from the line of Dan Fannin
with Jeffries, your line is now open.
Thanks, good morning. Andrew, I wanted to follow up on your comments around CBI. I think you said something about looking for strategic, something around accretion. I know that on their call, they talked about looking or exploring strategic options. So I was hoping you could maybe expand a bit upon that and maybe the rationale behind the timing and why now.
Hey, Dan, morning. So in terms of CBI and in general over, we're long-term investors, we're also deal makers, and so we like to look at basically anything that presents itself. And so over the years, we've looked at a wide variety of things. We felt comfortable mentioning it today, mainly because we put out the 8K a couple weeks ago from both CBI and UAN. And so when we look at our asset base, we think we are the CBI team, our very good low-cost operators, we think they're very good at running our finding business. And if we can find something interesting, then you would expect us to execute on it.
So that would be more from the context of adding to your through M&A or strategic capital deployment versus exiting any of the existing businesses.
I just say we'd look at all opportunities, whatever is available.
Understood. And then just moving to the auto segment, if we look at the path forward and the roadmap you've laid out, seems like cost cutting and cost rationalization is still very much in focus. Is that really the playbook for 2024 and then sales recovery from there? Or are you thinking about, or is the game plan or the outlook for sales to start to improve here more immediately in this kind of next couple of quarters?
Yeah, so I think if you were to look at just in the market in general in this space, I'd say demand is not spectacular. But, and that's kind of a short term phenomenon, we hope. But when we look at the long term opportunity for our auto service business, we think we have opportunities on all fronts. I think Dave has now been there as the permanent CEO for a few months and we think kind of the opportunities are really endless. If we talk about product sourcing, for an example, we think the company really probably could have done a better job in the past, right? So when we look at all of our different product categories, if we're more strategic about how we're buying, if we're more strategic about how we're pricing, then we think there are opportunities to drive higher gross margins on products. We think there are opportunities to improve the service level in the stores. We think there are opportunities to expand the Greenfield program. We think there are opportunities to help in relocating stores. And so I think really the opportunities are all above.
Right, that's helpful. And then I guess just at a high level, as you think about the environment, from a macro perspective and what you're seeing in terms of the activist investment style in this environment, given higher rates, higher for longer, are there more areas that you're seeing opportunity in than maybe you were a year ago, or is it the opposite where the economic backdrop is still quite strong and you're not maybe seeing the valuations and or kind of the incremental opportunity that you've seen previously, just trying to get a sense of today versus maybe a year ago in that investment opportunity set?
Yeah, so I've been at ICON for four years and I could say that pretty much there's always an opportunity for activism. Companies are always getting in trouble. Stock prices are always falling. Hidden gems can always be unlocked. And so in any given quarter, we're going through, I'm gonna guess, at least 10 different names where we think there's something. And we usually don't act, but we keep looking to find the right opportunity. I think last quarter, we found two names which eventually became public. We may or may not have made more investments since then, but nothing that is not publicly disclosed.
Understood, and then just lastly, appreciate the incremental disclosures around the hedging in the investment fund and the progress that you've made. Is this, what do you envision as a steady state when you think about the hedges and the long exposure, obviously not trying to predict what you're gonna do, but just generally as a philosophy, are you where you wanna be or do you think that there's more change in the context of the portfolio over the next couple of quarters?
Yeah, so I don't think we really wanna bet on where the market is going. I think we've been pretty clear we wanna stay away from that. There probably are not any large scale changes as to what we're gonna do in terms of taking down our short exposure. I think Carl would always like to be appropriately hedged. And I think based on how we feel and how we feel about our investments, that appropriate hedge could go down a little bit, but it's hard to take it off at these levels. So it's something we evaluate all the time, but I don't really foresee any material changes.
Understood, thanks for taking my question.
Thank you. I'm currently showing no further questions at this time. I'd like to hand the conference back over to Andrew Tino for closing remarks.
Thank you. So I'd like to leave today with a reminder that here at Icon Enterprises, we are intensely focused on our activism strategy. We have unique advantages, including the Icon brand name and a long history and willingness to wage proxy contests. It is this track record which frequently allows us to be invited to join boards and work cooperatively with our fellow directors to make the key changes that will drive shareholder value. Furthermore, given our balance sheet, liquidity, and permanent capital structure, we have the ability to tender for entire businesses, a tool most simply do not possess. Though returns can be lumpy and dissatisfying at times, as we continue to focus on our activist efforts at both our investment segment and control businesses, we believe they will bear fruit for all of our unit holders. We'll speak to everyone soon, bye.
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Everyone have a wonderful day.