Independent Bank Corp.

Good day and welcome to the INDB fourth quarter 2023 earnings conference call. All participants will be in a listen only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on a touch tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Before proceeding, please note that during this call, we will be making forward booking statements. Actual results may differ materially from these statements due to a number of factors, including those described in our earnings release and other SEC filings. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any such statements. In addition, some of our discussion today may include references to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Information about these non-GAAP measures, including reconciliation to GAAP measures, may be found in our earnings release and other SEC filings. These SEC filings can be accessed via the investor relations section of our website. Finally, please also note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jeff Tangle, CEO. Please go ahead.

Thanks, Betsy, and good morning, and thank you for joining us today. I'm accompanied this morning by CFO and head of consumer lending, Mark Ruggiero. Our fourth quarter and full year performance was a solid one, all things considered. Mark will take you through the details in a few minutes. First, though, I'd just like to share some thoughts briefly. I've been at Rockland Trust now almost a year, and it's been clear from my very first week here that our North Star is the connections we build with our customers, community members, and one another. What drives our colleagues is a shared vision to be the bank where each relationship matters. The resiliency and purpose that is inherent in our culture combined with our strong balance sheet and a commitment to creating long-term value is the winning combination and secret sauce that has carried Rockland Trust through various credit and economic cycles over the last century and will carry us forward. Thankfully, last year's Banking March Madness is in our rearview mirror. And with what appears to be a pause and possible rate cut by the Fed, the current backdrop appears to be stabilizing. While we don't expect this year to be easy by any means, we will continue to focus on those actions we have control over and look to capitalize on our historical strengths. There's no silver bullet to our value proposition. We do community banking really well and believe our current market position presents a high level of opportunity. we remain focused on long-term value creation. Our goal is to achieve top quartile financial performance while delivering a differentiated customer experience where each relationship matters. Evidence that this approach resonates with our commercial customers is our industry leading net promoter score as measured by Greenwich Associates. In order to provide this differentiated experience, we need employees who feel a sense of purpose at work and supported in their efforts. That is why we are proud of being named a top place to work in Massachusetts by the Boston Globe for the 15th year in a row. 2024 will be about generating organic growth and expanding relationships, credit risk management, and expense control. At nearly 20 million in assets, we believe we have the scale to invest in product capability to compete with larger institutions while delivering product and service locally. It is this high touch, high service level that differentiates us from many of our competitors. And while we may be in the early innings of managing through our commercial real estate office exposure, we will draw upon our decades of demonstrated credit and portfolio management skills to mitigate any inherent risks. It's difficult to paint the entire office portfolio with one brush because they all have unique characteristics. That is why we have action plans if needed tailored to each individual loan and relationship. With that in mind, we do see near-term growth opportunities to exploit our proven operating model in a variety of ways, including leveraging the Rockland Trust business model in our newer markets like the North Shore and Worcester. We recently hired a seasoned executive to manage our North Shore market to leverage the market and branch presence we acquired from the East Boston Savings Acquisition. We've continued to invest in technology and data analytics to deliver actionable insights for our bankers. As I've mentioned on previous calls, we are in the middle of upgrading our core FIS operating system to a newer version. We are installing a new online account opening platform, Mantle, and we continue to leverage tools like Salesforce and Encino. And those are just a few examples of some of the projects that will enable us to deliver on our relationship promise. Ongoing focus on organic loan and deposit growth is another lever. We have a number of 2024 initiatives here to facilitate growth to include things like a bank at work program, a new inside sales team for commercial deposits and treasury management, recalibrating incentive programs to more heavily weight deposit gathering, and a focus on deposit-rich industry segments. We also expect to more fully leverage some of our industry verticals to drive growth in CNI. And finally, opportunistically attracting high-performing talent who can drive revenue. We've had some success in 2023 and expect our unique value proposition will resonate with talent in the market and enable us to continue that trend in 2024. While M&A activity remains somewhat muted, we will continue to be disciplined and poised to take advantage of opportunities that fit our historical acquisition strategy and pricing parameters when conditions improve. It's been a proven value driver in the past, and we expect it to be one in the future. This pause in M&A activity has also allowed us to successfully deploy some of our excess capital via a stock buyback at what we believe were very attractive prices. The current environment has also allowed us to focus on upgrading and adding to our tech platform. I mentioned a number of examples a few minutes ago. It has also allowed us to examine our internal processes in order to become more efficient and effective. Some examples of this strategic review where we expect to create cost savings and efficiencies over time are a more strategic look at our facilities management and our procurement functions. We will continue to be diligent and prudent managers of expenses while investing in talent and technology. To summarize, we have everything in place to deliver the results the market has been accustomed to over the years, including a talented and deep management team, ample capital, highly attractive markets, good expense management, disciplined credit underwriting, strong brand recognition, operating scale, a deep consumer and commercial customer base, and an energized and engaged workforce. In short, I believe we are well positioned to not only navigate through the current challenging environment, but to take market share and continue to be an acquirer of choice in the Northeast. And on that note, I'll turn it over to Mark.

Thanks, Jeff. I will now take us through the earnings presentation deck that was included in our AK filing and is available on our website and today's investor portal. Starting on slide three of that deck, 2023 fourth quarter GAAP net income was $54.8 million and diluted EPS was $1.26 with all major contributors, especially in line, essentially in line with expectations. Factoring into the EPS results, we bought back approximately 1.28 million shares during the fourth quarter at a total cost of 69 million, reflecting an average repurchase price of $53.73 per share. In summary, these results produced a strong 1.13% return on assets, a 7.51% return on average common equity, and an 11.50% return on average tangible common equity. In addition, despite the buyback activity during the quarter, tangible book value per share grew an exceptional $1.53, or 3.6% in the fourth quarter. I will now highlight a few key points in the additional slides provided. As noted on slide four, total deposits declined $193 million, or 1.3%, to $14.87 billion for the quarter, while average deposits dropped 0.6%. Business customer cash flows drove most of the decrease, as consumer and municipal balances remained fairly consistent quarter over quarter. The main deposit story has not changed much, as we continue to see the impact from some product remixing, persistent competitive rate pressure, and seedy maturity repricing. The underlying dynamic in the current rate environment for the banking industry continues to be customer pursuit of higher yields. Despite those headwinds, the long-term stability of our deposit franchise remains intact, with total non-interest-bearing deposits comprising a healthy 30.7% at year-end, and the fourth quarter cost of deposits of 1.31%, though up 24 basis points from the prior quarter, still reflects a strong cumulative deposit beta when compared to our peers. As a quick reflection back on full year 2023 results, we reaffirmed the message we shared on a number of occasions throughout this volatile period. We grew total households by 2.7% during the year, building on our already strong and established deposit base. The vast majority of balance outflows reflect usage of excess funds from still existing relationships, with no notable change or acceleration in closed accounts during the year. We feel our loyal customer and deposit bases provide a real source of strength over both the near and long term. Jumping to slide seven, total loans increased $54 million or 0.4% to $14.3 billion for the quarter. The balance increase was driven primarily by adjustable rate residential loans, while CNI pay downs and a reduced appetite for commercial real estate drove a modest decline in total commercial balances during the quarter. The increase noted in commercial real estate is primarily driven by conversion of existing construction projects into permanent status. And while slide eight provides an overall snapshot of the makeup of the various loan portfolios, we will take a deeper dive into overall asset quality, along with an update on non-owner occupied commercial office exposure. Moving to slides nine and 10, which provide various updates and risk viewpoints on a number of factors, I'll highlight a few now. First, total nonperforming assets increased to $54.4 million, but still represent only 0.38% and 0.28% of total loans and assets respectively. In terms of key drivers of nonperforming assets, the remaining $9 million of outstandings from the previous office property foreclosure was paid in full. while the new to non-performing amounts are primarily driven by the migration of two commercial loans. Net charge-offs during the quarter were well contained and declined to 3.8 million or 11 basis points of loans on an annualized basis. And the provision for loan loss of 5.5 million brought the allowance to an even 1% of loans. Within the closely monitored non-owner occupied office portfolio, there's a couple of highlights worth noting. Total outstanding balances decreased modestly, while total criticized and classified balances remain very manageable at only 11 loans. In addition, we continue to closely monitor our top 20 office exposures, which make up approximately $516 million in balances, or 49% of the office portfolio at year end. Within these top 20, we note zero non-performers, $55 million in a criticized status, and only $19 million as classified. Turning to slide 11, as anticipated, the continued pressure on cost of deposits outpaced asset yield repricing benefit, resulting in a 3.38% margin for the quarter, which reflects a nine basis point drop from the prior quarter, or 12 basis points when excluding non-core items. While the margin results were in line with our previous quarter guidance, it is worth noting the recent emerging downward rate pressure on longer-term fixed rate pricing. If this pressure remains for a prolonged period, some of the previously anticipated benefit from asset repricing would be negated, and this dynamic is factored into the forward-looking guidance I'll provide shortly. Moving to slide 12, fee income remained strong and was fairly consistent with the prior quarter, which, as a reminder, benefited from $2.7 million of non-recurring gains on bank-owned life insurance and loan-related fees. In summary, deposit, interchange, and ATM fees remained strong, and assets under administration on the wealth management side grew nicely by nearly 7% to $6.5 billion at year-end, which should bode well for revenue moving forward. Turning to slide 13, total expenses increased $3 million for 3% when compared to the prior quarter. And the increase was driven primarily by a one-time FDIC assessment accrual of $1.1 million and one-time charges of $657,000 related to the write-off of acquired facilities. And lastly, the tax rate for the quarter of 22.7% includes $840,000 of outsized benefit. with the largest component being the expiration and release of reserves on uncertain tax positions in conjunction with the October filing of the 2022 tax return. As we move to slide 14 and focus on forward-looking guidance, we remain confident that we are well positioned to thrive when the environment begins to turn. Having said that, we recognize the level of uncertainty still driving near-term impact on credit and funding pressures. As such, we have provided some level of full-year guidance while staying grounded in our operating assumptions to provide outlook over specific components limited to the near term. Big picture, we anticipate 2024 will bring modest loan and deposit growth versus 2023 year-end levels, with net growth likely skewed towards the second half of the year. More specifically for the first quarter, we expect we will again experience our normal seasonal outflow of deposits, resulting in a low single-digit decrease from December balances. But as I just mentioned, growth is projected for the second half of the year. Loan balances are anticipated to stay relatively flat for the first quarter as mortgage production starts to shift toward more saleable activity. As I alluded to earlier, the shape of the curve matters, and not all Fed reserve decreases are created equal. With the potential for a prolonged, even steeper inverted curve, loan and deposit pricing challenges will persist, and we now expect the margin percentage to decrease and stabilize in the mid-320s range in the first half of the year. As it relates to asset quality, we have no significant changes to our guidance regarding asset quality and provision for loan loss, which we believe will continue to be driven primarily by the near-term performance of our investment commercial real estate portfolio. Regarding fee income and non-interest expense, we expect both to experience low single-digit percentage increases in 2024 versus 2023 fourth quarter annualized levels. And similar to prior years, Q1 expenses should reflect slightly higher salary and benefits expenses due primarily from increased payroll taxes. And to echo Jeff's comments, control and expense levels and seeking operating efficiencies are priority objectives for us. Lastly, the tax rate for 2024 is expected to be around 23% for the full year, down slightly from full year 2023 levels due in part to increased low-income housing tax credit investments. That concludes my comments and we will now open it up for questions.

We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star and 1 on your touchtone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, Please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question today comes from Mark Fitzgibbon with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Good morning and happy Friday. Mark, just to follow up on your guidance slide there, deposits have been trending down for a while now. What gives you confidence that we're going to see, you know, low single-digit deposit growth in 2024? Is that a function of you guys sort of nudging rates up on deposits, or you feel like we've kind of gotten to the bottom and things are starting to normalize?

Yeah, you know, it's been continuing to tick down, as you suggest. It does feel like, you know, things will be stabilizing here in the very near term. You know, when you look at the components of our deposit franchise, consumer balances actually stabilized very well in the fourth quarter and were relatively flat. And really the decline we experienced in the fourth quarter was mostly business customers drawing on what appears to still be some level of excess liquidity. And we do see typically some year-end outflows, a lot of family-owned businesses, a lot of small businesses where tax planning, tax distributions, year-end bonuses create some pressure on balances. And that spills over into the first quarter as well. So I think there's a little bit of that we'll continue to see. But all in all, we're growing households. We're not seeing accounts close. So we do think we're getting to a point here where the decline should bottom out.

Also, if I could add, Mark, we have a number of initiatives, some of which I alluded to in my opening comments, really completely focused on gathering deposits, whether it's modifying incentive compensation programs to skew towards deposits or inside sales groups. We have a number of initiatives focused on just that. It's a focus of ours in 2024, to be sure.

Okay. And then I wanted you to share with us what the spot NIM was in the month of December.

Yes. So December's margin was $333,000.

Okay. And then I think you mentioned there were two commercial loans for, I think, $26 million that migrated to non-accrual this quarter. What industry were those in? And maybe if you could just give some high-level color on what the issues were.

Sure. So the largest – do you want me to take that, Jeff? Yes. Okay. The largest was actually a CNI relationship. It's actually – a participated deal that is still in operations. It's an ABL loan with essentially Yellen Iron equipment, much larger facility. That company declared bankruptcy but is still in operations. We believe from initial appraisals that there's some level of solid collateral protection. It's just a matter of how those equipment sales will unfold. and ultimately what sale price we would see get recognized on them. But that is actually a loan that we did do a specific impairment on and is included in our reserve. And then lastly, sorry, the second loan is actually an office loan that had matured in the fourth quarter. We did not renew that and is actually expected to go through to a sale of the note. and we believe that sale will be at about 75 cents on the dollar. So that is the charge off you're seeing as well in the fourth quarter. It's about a $2.8 million charge off on an $11 million loan, so that net balance is one of the new to non-performers.

Okay, and I guess sort of a bigger picture question, do you think Bank M&A is sort of possible In this environment, do we need interest rates to come down and sort of the regulatory environment to become more certain in order for you guys to consider doing an acquisition right now?

Well, it all depends, right? It depends on how big the deal is. I'm speaking just for us. Obviously, a smaller deal, we think the regulatory environment might be a bit more accommodating versus a transaction that's much larger that has more integration risk and It might be a bit more challenging. The numbers have gotten a little bit better. They're moving in the right direction when we do our modeling. Not sure we're quite there yet, but it feels like we're getting closer. So I would say net-net, as I sit here today, the possibility or the probability of the M&A environment, it feels better than it did three or six months ago. I don't think it's where it needs to be. but it's trending in the right direction.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Steve Moss with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. Thank you. Just going back to the margin for a second here, just curious, does your first half 24, you guys mentioned you're following the forward curve, I think. or the Treasury curve, I should say. So to me, that implies you're not really dialing in any rate cuts in your margin guidance. Just curious, you know, if the Fed were to cut this year, how you think that would impact the margin here?

Yeah, it's certainly an interesting question, Steve. I mean, we would think longer term that would certainly be beneficial to us. I think the ability to move on deposits over the long term would suggest it gives us margin stabilization and likely margin improvement going forward. I think the reality is, is, you know, the very short term, you know, first quarter, second quarter after a Fed cut, I think the challenge will be how quickly we can move on deposits. So we will have net of our hedges about 25% of our loans that would reprice down on the short end of the curve. We have a number of Overnight borrowings, that would move as well to mitigate that. And we have purposely created most of our time deposits to be short-term in nature so that you should see maturities and repricing on the CD book benefit as well. But how quickly we can move on some of our exception and rack rate deposit pricing, I think that will still be partly driven by competitive pressures. in our market. So I think that's a little bit of where there's probably some wild card as to whether you can completely negate the asset repricing down and fully offset, or whether that'll take a little bit of time to materialize. Right.

Okay. That's fair. And then Mark, you also mentioned, excuse me, downward pressure on new loans here, given the change of the O-curve. Just curious, where is loan pricing these days and You know, also just curious, you know, you have lower construction balances here. If that's also kind of driving a component of your loan yields going forward, lower going forward.

Yeah, it is. I mean, so some of the products that are typically priced off the short end of the curve, like construction, we've seen declining and less opportunity there. So that's somewhat of a little bit of a new, not a new trend, but, you know, we're seeing more of that. And, you know, my reference to the yield curve, when you look at anywhere between the three or seven year part of the curve, just from September to where we are today, on average it's down about 50 or 60 basis points. So we'd like to think we can still get some fixed rate commercial pricing around 7% in this environment, but that is down from how we were thinking about it just a few months ago. And I think on the consumer side, similarly, Home equity continues to be pretty constrained in terms of net growth because of the high rate on lines of credit. So we're not seeing much of an ability to increase there. And customers are just not drawing on some of these lines as well. So utilization rates, both on home equity and in the C&I business, are at lows, low points over the last year or so. So it's been a combination of things that we're putting a little bit more pressure on you know, what we still think will be benefit of asset and loans repricing, but I think it's going to be a bit more mitigated than how we were thinking about it.

You know, one other thing I would – sorry, Mark. I was just going to add one other thing to that, which is as we – as you think longer term, as we move forward and we begin to focus a bit more on the CNI segment of our business, those typically are going to be a lot of lines of credit, which will be priced you know, very short-term, right, typically off of SOFR. And so I think, you know, kind of long-term secular trend would be a greater percentage of our loan portfolio would be floating rate versus fixed rate.

Okay, that's all very helpful. And then maybe just on the credit front here, you know, delinquencies were up 44 bps this quarter versus 22 last. Just curious what's driving that. If you have any color there.

Yeah, the biggest drivers are the two new to non-performers as well. So those were performing as of last quarter. Those are now new to delinquency. And there's essentially one other office loan that is now early stage delinquency. That'll be maturing here in the first quarter in 2024. We're working with that bar to see what the resolution may be, but basically limited to three loans, the two that are non-performing and one other office.

Okay. And maybe just curious, you know, you mentioned that office loan maturing here. You have $125 million of office loans maturing in the upcoming year. Just curious, you know, do you expect that will be the primary source of potential credit issues and that drives your loan loss provision as you guys referenced in the deck or, you know, will maybe potential office NPAs just be idiosyncratic, just kind of any color you can give there.

I'll start, Mark. I think you hit the nail on the head. It's going to be idiosyncratic. As I said in my prepared remarks, it's difficult to paint that portfolio with one brush. Every loan has unique characteristics, whether it's location, sponsor, resources that they can bring to the party as we look at extending or if they look to refinance elsewhere. So each one is different. We feel pretty good as we sit here today about managing through that because we are on top of all of them, but I don't think there's I don't think we're going to necessarily feel like we're going to see a bunch of new non-performers out of that $125 million of maturing loans.

I concur. When you look out over the other portfolios, there's really been no uptick of any note in terms of delinquencies or early downgrade credit migration. So the rest of the portfolio continues to feel really good. And even the near term on the office side, when you look out over even just as short term as the next two quarters, it's really just a handful of larger credits that we have really good eyes and ears on and are working directly with the borrowers to hopefully find good resolution plans. So it does feel very well contained.

Appreciate all the color. Thanks, guys. You're welcome.

The next question comes from Lori Hunsaker with SRP. Please go ahead.

Yeah, hi, thanks. Good morning, Jeff and Mark. Just staying on office, of the office loan that's in an early stage delinquency, how much is that loan? And is it class A or class B? Anything that you can share on that?

Yeah, that balance is about $11 million. I believe it's a Class A. I mean, that one, to be fully transparent, I mean, we may see that move to non-performing in the first quarter. But, again, we're working closely with the borrower on that. And, you know, I think if there's any lost exposure there, it feels pretty well contained.

That's also one. We're not the agent. We participate in somebody else's deal in that. Okay.

And then of the $125 million that's maturing in 24, how much of that matures in the first quarter?

In the first quarter, it's probably a little under half. There's 34, 35 million comprised of just two loans, and then much smaller after that. If I had to peg a number, I don't have all the details in front of me. It's probably around somewhere in the 30% to 40% range.

Okay.

Some of those we've already actually are in the process of renewing as we speak, and we think we'll resolve and have a three-year extension on it at a really good debt service and LTV level. So one out of those two is already in the works of being renewed and we feel good about.

Okay. Okay. And then what are the actual loan balances on the two commercial loans that came over? How big was the ABL loan?

I mean, I'm thinking it's $17 million, but do you have a... Yep, the ABL was $17.5 million, and the office loan came in at $11, but we wrote off $2.8 million of it. So it's in NPAs at the net, call it $18.5 million.

Gotcha, gotcha. Okay, and then what was that Class A or Class B?

The write-off. Correct. Yeah, that was a Class B. That was a Class B. Okay.

And then I know you had $100 million in office mature in the fourth quarter. Was this $11 million or $8.5 million net loan one of the ones that hit a maturity wall? Was that what drove this in the first quarter or anything you can share on that?

Yes, it did hit maturity in the fourth quarter, and we elected not to renew on that one.

Gotcha. Oh, yeah, you did say that in your comments. Thank you. Okay.

Great.

And then just one last question. Just going back to the deposit side here, you know, just thinking about sort of the mixed shift change and maybe just the overall your loans to deposits sitting at 96%. or for backing out CDs, that's 112%. How should we think about those ceilings? How do you think about, you know, as high as you want to get there? How should we be thinking about that?

Thanks. Yeah, I'll start. We're pretty close to being where we want to be. I mean, we don't have a bright line on it, but we definitely would have a very, very strong preference at having a loan-to-deposit ratio of less than one. and which is why we're very focused on growing deposits in 2024.

Great. Okay. Thanks for taking my questions. Appreciate the detail.

Sure.

As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star and 1 to be joined into the question queue. The next question comes from Chris O'Connell with KBW. Please go ahead.

Morning. Yeah, I was just hoping to hone in on some of the fee and expense guide, specifically on the fees with the 1Q number being relatively flat to the 4Q number. Other income has been pressed up over the past couple of quarters quite a bit. I know you guys noted a couple of kind of seasonal or one-time-ish factors in Q4. How do you see that settling out into the first quarter?

Yeah, the total fee income, I think the strength of the total fee income will continue to be primarily on the heels of the wealth management group. We mentioned in our comments the AUA being up to $6.5 billion. That should bode very well for strong revenues heading into 2024. And we're not necessarily banking on significant increases, but we are optimistic that in this environment, we're continuing to see more of the mortgage production shift to saleable. Now, overall volumes are down, but we should see some levels shift back to saleable and hopefully give us a little bit of lift on mortgage banking income. Our deposit fees, we feel, are very stable. We think there's probably some pressure coming on the regulatory front, perhaps on overdraft, but I think we have already made changes and have most of that behind us, so we might see some modest decreases related to overdraft, but all in all, there's been good momentum on deposit, interchange, ATM fees, etc., And then lastly, you know, I was going to mention in some of the conversations earlier around pricing, we think this opportunity is, you know, this environment gives us opportunity to think hard again about swaps for some of our commercial lending and whether we can, you know, shift pricing strategies to take on a bit more swap volume and generate additional fees there. So I think there's a few levers there that, you know, that bode well and have you know, run rate to increase in the very near term, and that's what's anchored in our guidance.

Great. That's helpful. And then on the expense side, you know, you guys mentioned, you know, the initiatives that you have going on, you know, including, you know, the potential, you know, for some cost savings, you know, on the branch and fulfillment side. Any sense of, you know, the timing of how that could play out over the course of the year? And is that, you know, those potential cost savings, is that embedded in the overall, you know, expense guide?

They're not embedded in the overall expense guide. So those would be just incremental savings that we would experience. And I think the facilities – on the facilities side, that's probably – um would be skewed towards the back half of the year or maybe even bleed into next year maybe so a little bit of both um on the procurement side i think we'll see some savings uh from that in in 2024 but we haven't put a number on that yet got it any sense of the you know potential range even if you know pretty wide as to you know what the magnitude of those cost savings could be once all said and done Yeah, I don't have an estimate, Mark. I don't know if you do. We'd be calculating at this point.

Yeah, I think it's fair to say it isn't at a range where it's worth highlighting at this point, but we'll give more guidance on that probably in the next quarter or two as we hopefully get to a little bit more of a clearer path on some of it.

Yeah, and honestly, that's not a game changer for us to be sure, but it's really illustrative of a whole host of things that we're looking at as we examine our expense base and as we think about the environment that we're in. So I mentioned that in my prepared remarks as an example of some of the things that we're looking at. There's a whole host of other examples I could have given you. Each one of them, you know, in and of themselves aren't going to move the needle, but when you add them all up, we think it all just kind of funnels back into being good expense managers.

Got it. And on the deposit side, you know, how much of this CD portfolio, I guess, has, you know, yet to reprice? And, you know, I guess let's start there.

Yeah, the impact is becoming less and less, which is the good news moving forward. And then in Q1, we expect about $800 million to mature and reprice. But I guess the positive there is that the weighted average coupon on that pool right now is high threes, about 3.8%. So the repricing dynamic now is not as severe as it once was. And then I believe it's another $750 million or so in Q2 that is set to mature that is also at a high 3.8% weighted average coupon. So, you know, and assuming today's rain environment stays as is, you know, you'd see that level potentially price up anywhere up to, you know, a full percentage point. But we hope that that, you know, that would be more like a 50 or 75 basis point increase over the next couple of quarters in terms of the impact from CDE pricing.

Great. That's perfect. Thanks for taking my questions. You're welcome. Thank you.

The next question comes from Steve Moss with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

I just want to follow up for me on the buyback here. You guys bought $69 million worth of stock, and I know you have $100 million authorized. Just curious, you know, about your thoughts on the pace here going forward and how you guys are thinking maybe about issuing a new repurchase plan.

Yeah, Mark, do you want to take kind of the pace of play today?

Sure. Yeah, as you mentioned, you're spot on. There's about $30 million left under the existing plan. I think our posture hasn't changed. It's there to be opportunistic. Um, we continue to think about executing on that plan through the lens of ensuring appropriate initial capital dilution and feel comfortable about the earn back and executing on that. So, you know, that'll, that'll serve as the framework through the first quarter, meaning, you know, really just opportunistic on depending where the, where the stock price is barring all other things staying equal. Um, And then I think it's fair to talk about and be thinking about re-upping on a plan given our overall capital levels. We still feel we have really good handle on credit and stabilization of the funding. So I think as a tool for deployment of capital going forward, we haven't made any decisions on that, but I think it's fair to suggest that would be a lever we would continue to look to throughout most of 2024. Again, being very opportunistic over where it makes sense to execute.

Okay, appreciate that. And then one more, if I may, Mark, on the margin going back. You guys had some swap expirations in the second half of this past year. Just curious if there are any swap expirations in 2024 or 2025 that we should expect to help the margins.

Yeah, in fact, we have probably on average about 100 million matures on a quarterly basis throughout 2024. So I know for sure it's 100 million in Q1, and then it's somewhere between 50 and 100 million in the out-quarters as well. So that's a reason why we've always talked about stabilization of the margin. There's a couple of levers like that. It's the hedge maturities. It's allowing the securities portfolio to continue to run off without essentially just either paying down borrowings or holding cash at 5%. A lot of what's running off on the securities book is that weighted average coupons of about one, one and a quarter. We're seeing good lift just from hedge maturities and securities runoff in addition to the loan repricing dynamic that we've been talking about. At some point, once the deposit pressures subside, I think those three factors will be enough to offset and maintain the margin at the level we've got it to.

Okay. Thank you very much. Appreciate all the call.

No problem.

The next question comes from Lori Hunziker from SRP. Please go ahead.

Yeah, hi, thanks. Good morning. Just one follow-up, Mark. The non-interest income of $32 million, that other, other piece that was $7.8 million looks outsized, looks a little bit outsized. Can you help us think about what's non-recurring in that?

Yeah, we have a big piece in this quarter is our unrealized gains on equity. We have a very small equity securities portfolio that's tied to a defined benefit plan. That requires mark-to-market accounting. So you see a little bit of volatility each quarter. If it's a loss, you'll typically see that get recognized through other non-interest expense. If it's a gain, you'll see it go through other non-interest income. That was about $700,000 this quarter. So I think your Q3 number and quarters prior to that are probably the right level for that line item.

Great.

Thanks. Okay.

This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Jeff Tangle for any closing remarks.

Thank you for your continued interest in Independent Bancorp and we will talk to you next quarter. Have a good day.