Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Good morning and welcome to the Jack Henry First Quarter 2025 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star, then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Vance Sherrod, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Wyatt. Good morning and thank you for joining the Jack Henry First Quarter of fiscal 2025 earnings call. Today I am joined by President and CEO Greg Adelson and CFO and Treasurer Mimi Carsley. Following my opening remarks, Greg will share his insights on the first quarter of our fiscal year and provide observations on our business and the industry. Mimi will then discuss the financial results and full year guidance outlined in yesterday's press release, which is available in the investor relations section of the Jack Henry website. Afterward, we will open the lines for a Q&A session. Please note that this call includes forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. The company is not obligated to update or revise these statements. For a summary of risk factors and additional information that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements, refer to yesterday's press release and the risk factors and forward-looking statements sections in our 10-K. During this call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures such as non-GAAP revenue and non-GAAP operating income. Reconciliation for these measures are included in yesterday's press release. Now I will hand the call over to Greg.

Thank you, Vance. Good morning, and I appreciate each of you joining this morning's call. I'm pleased to report overall solid financial performance results in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2025. I'd like to begin by thanking our associates for their hard work and commitment to our success by doing whatever it takes in doing the right thing for our clients. As I introduced in my script last quarter, I will share three main takeaways from the quarter and then we'll provide additional detail about our overall business. First, our financial performance. We exceeded our first quarter outlook. We had non-GAAP revenue growth of .3% in Q1, slightly ahead of the .25% anticipated in August. As we indicated in August, Q1 revenue and margins were impacted by slower growth rates for on-premise annual maintenance and card processing. Additionally, several long-term software usage contracts closed in Q1 of last year, creating a difficult comparison for this quarter. We remain confident in our full year non-GAAP revenue guidance of 7 to 8%. We provided commentary in August that non-GAAP margin would see contraction of 100 basis points. We ended the quarter with only 89 basis points of contraction. Second, our sales performance. After a record Q4 for our sales team, we continued the positive momentum with record sales attainment in Q1 that included six competitive core wins. Of the six, three were financial institutions with over one billion in assets, including one seven billion asset win. We also closed six deals to move existing clients from in-house processing to our private cloud. Third, our client conference. We had a very successful Jack Henry Connect conference last month in Phoenix with nearly 2,600 clients and prospects in attendance. This is our largest conference of the year and produces a significant number of sales leads. Last year, 17 of our new core wins were from prospects that attended the conference. Now for more detail on our overall business. During the quarter, we were proud to be included in several national best places to work rankings. We placed 16th in Newsweek's list of top 200 most loved workplaces, marking our third consecutive year ranked in the top 20. We also made Newsweek's most admired workplaces list, earning five stars, which is the highest possible rating. Additionally, we ranked number 11 in IDC's 2024 FinTech rankings based on annual revenue, representing our 16th consecutive year on that list. We are honored to receive these national recognitions as they reflect our people first culture, commitment to exceptional service, and success in delivering innovative technology that empowers community and regional financial institutions. Our payment segment continues to perform well. We signed four new debit processing clients and three new credit clients in the quarter. We now have 324 clients on the Zelle platform, 326 clients using RTP, representing approximately 43% of the live RTP clients, and 290 clients using FedNow, representing approximately 36% of the live FedNow clients. In our Complimary segment, we signed seven new financial crimes defender contracts in the quarter. In addition, we signed 26 new contracts for the financial crimes defender faster payment fraud module, a real-time solution designed to help mitigate fraud in Zelle, FedNow, and RTP transactions. We have installed 83 financial crimes defender customers and have another 94 in various stages of implementation. We also have 37 faster payment modules installed and 133 in various stages of implementation. Continuing with our Complimary segment, we continue to see strong success with our Vano digital solution. For the quarter, we signed 12 new clients to the Vano retail platform, as well as 18 new Vano business deals. We currently have more than 950 Vano retail clients with over 180 live with Vano business. We finished the quarter with 12.7 million registered users on the Vano platform. At the end of Q1 last year, we had 10.5 million registered users, a 20% increase over the past 12 months. Each year, we sponsored two technology surveys. We conducted the Jack Henry Strategy benchmark in mid-January through early February, and this only goes to Jack Henry clients. We also co-sponsored a survey with Bank Director, and the results from their mid-June to early July technology prioritization and spending questions were published in September. In the Bank Director survey, 75% of the respondents reported an increase in their bank technology's budget for fiscal year 2024. Their top technology objectives are to improve operational efficiency, attract and retain customers, and increase deposits. Those results are consistent with findings from our strategy benchmark published last spring. In that survey, 80% of our own clients said they plan to increase technology spending over the next two years, with their top priorities being growing deposits, increasing operational efficiency, and growing loans. Although the two surveys were conducted six months apart, they yield very similar results around planned technology spending and key priorities. As I mentioned earlier, Jack Henry Connect was a tremendous success, and we received rave reviews from our clients, prospects, and industry consultants that attended the event. Along with the more than 2,400 clients in attendance, we hosted 130 prospect attendees from 50 financial institutions. Our technology showcase included 250 third-party fintechs, with most being competitors, which underscores our philosophy to be an open technology provider. Our vendor exit survey indicated 99% of these fintechs want to exhibit again at our conference in 2025. The conference agenda was robust and anchored by the significant progress we made on our technology monetization initiative. We continue to execute the strategy of breaking out key components of the core and building them on a cloud-native API-first platform, the Jack Henry platform. We are live with domestic wires, international wires, data broker, and entitlement. We are in beta testing with both exception processing and general ledger. We remain on track to deliver a digital retail and commercial deposit-only core during calendar year 2026. I will continue to provide more details on our progress throughout the year. As we've done in prior years at the Jack Henry Connect, we held our annual CBO forum, which was attended by 185 CEOs, a new record for us. The general feedback throughout the meeting suggested that attendees are less concerned about the overall economy than last year, and they continue to invest in technology to enhance digital capabilities, improve efficiencies, and modernize their businesses. The CEO agenda was well received by both clients and prospects, and included a demonstration of our recently announced SMB solution with Moo. As mentioned at Investor Day, we remain on track to deliver this unique solution to Bano early adopter clients in May of 2025. This solution will be sold through our bank and credit use to capture more and higher value deposits while positioning the financial institution at the center of the relationship with their SMB customers. The SMB will benefit from eight daily settlement windows, -to-pay capabilities for both iOS and Android devices, one-click enrollment and approval, and continuous accounting reconciliation. In closing, we hold our annual shareholder meeting next week in Monat, Missouri. We will also offer a webcast viewing option for observers to watch remotely. I remain extremely optimistic about the demand environment based on the recent surveys I referenced and our pipeline returning to an all-time high. Furthermore, we continue to hear positive feedback from our clients, prospects, and industry consultants regarding our key differentiators of culture, exceptional service, and innovative technology. These strengths, along with our proven track record of execution, will continue to drive positive results and position us well for the future. With that, I'll turn it over to Meanie for more specifics on our financial.

Thank you, Greg, and good morning, everyone. Our continued focus on culture, service, and innovation, while supporting our community and regional financial institution clients led to another quarter of solid revenue and earnings growth and a healthy start to our fiscal year. I will cover the details behind our first quarter results and then conclude with commentary on the second quarter outlook and our fiscal 25 guidance. Q1 gap and non-gap revenue increased 5% consistent with our expectations and providing the base for achieving our full year guidance. Quarterly deconversion revenue of approximately 4 million, which we released prior to full earnings, was largely flat with the same period last year, reflecting minimal consolidation of our clients. This is also consistent with our expectations. Now, taking a closer look at the details. Gap and non-gap services and support revenue increased 4%. Data processing and hosting continue to be significant drivers of services and support revenue growth, lower license and hardware revenue compared with prior year, moderated services and support revenue. Our private and public cloud offerings increased over 11% in the quarter, reflecting strong, persistent growth. This reoccurring revenue contributor is 30% of our total revenue and has long been a key double-digit growth engine. Gifting to processing revenue, which is 41% of our total revenue and another significant contributor for a long-term growth model. We saw strong performance with 7% growth on both a gap and non-gap basis for the quarter. Continuing long-term trends, quarterly drivers include increased cars, digital and payment processing revenue. Completing commentary on revenue, I would highlight quarterly total reoccurring revenue is 93%. Quarterly enterprise key revenue was 71% of total revenue and grew at 9%. Including hardware, non-key revenue grew 1%. Next, moving to expenses. Beginning with the cost of revenue, which increased 6% on both a gap and non-gap basis for the quarter. Drivers for the quarter included higher direct costs, increased personnel costs, internal license and amortization. For clarification and to assist with models, the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles was 6 million for the quarter. Next, R&D expense increased 8% on both a gap and non-gap basis for the quarter. The quarterly increase was primarily related to personnel costs. Ending with SG&A expense, for the quarter on a gap basis, it decreased over 15% versus prior year, related to last year's one-time VDIP cost. SG&A increased 7% on a non-gap basis. We remain focused on generating annually compounding margin expansion, while the quarter results delivered an 89-base point decrease in non-gap margin to 25%. We remain confident in our ability to deliver full-year margin expansion consistent with our full-year guide. These solid quarterly results produced a fully-deleted gap earnings per share of $1.63, up 17%. This was partially driven by the VDIP expense in Q1 of fiscal 24 that were non-reoccurring. Reviewing the three operating segments, we were pleased by positive performance across the board. Our core segment revenue increased 5% for the quarter on a non-gap basis against the tough cost. Our segment key revenue was 62% of total segment quarterly revenue, with tremendous growth of 12%. Non-key revenues, primarily on promise, annual maintenance decreased 4%. Non-gap operating margin decreased 84 basis points. Margins were impacted by software usage and headcount associated with implementation. Payment segment quarterly revenue increased 6% on a non-gap basis. The segment, again, had impressive non-gap operating margin growth of 103 basis points. Revenue growth was due to continued growth in our card-related risk management solutions and strong growth from faster payments. Margins benefited from lower cost of revenue and card network incentives. Finally, complementary segment, quarterly non-gap revenue growth increased 7% from a strong product mix, with hosting and digital being a consistent source. Segment margin contracted 45 basis points primarily due to amortization, license and fees, and direct support costs, partially offset by the growth and hosting and digital revenue. Now let's turn to a review of cash flow and capital allocation. First quarter operating cash flow is $117 million, a $40 million decrease over the prior period, reflecting a timing shift, higher annual maintenance collection in Q4 last year than the historical norm. Prailing 12-month free cash flow is $289 million, resulting in a 72% conversion. Our consistent dedication to value creation resulted in a trailing 12-month return on invested capital of 20%. Heading into the second quarter, I will conclude with comments on quarterly cadence and full year guidance metrics. As you're aware, yesterday's press release included fiscal 2025 full year gap guidance, along with the reconciliation for non-gap guidance metrics, all of which are reiterated. While the press release also included a fiscal 25 non-gap EPS metric, this is not intended to be a new guidance metric. The purpose is to provide additional clarity on our numbers, and it should be noted that a 24% tax rate is used. All of the current fiscal year guidance metrics are aligned with our near-term targets as the business operations remain healthy and consistent. Our outlook for financial performance remains upbeat with the pace of fiscal 2025 non-gap revenue margin on track to increase sequentially throughout the year. This accelerating cadence will result in a strong second half that will be more pronounced than typical. Consequently, U2 expectations for non-gap revenue growth is approximately 6%, with non-gap margins flat to slightly down. The rest of the year is expected to improve strongly, resulting in a full year guidance remaining consistent with our longer-term targets. As a reminder, we see fluctuations in quarterly results relating to software usage license components, along with the timing and implementation. Therefore, the correct indicator of our business is the consistently strong fiscal year financial results. In conclusion, Q1 was consistent with our expectations and set us up to achieve a full year that is consistent with our stated long-term targets. We remain focused on delivering long-term profitable growth at scale through compounding revenue growth and margin expansion. We appreciate the efforts of our more than 7,100 dedicated associates that drove these strong results and our investors for their ongoing confidence. Wyatt, will you please open the line for questions?

We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then 1, on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star, then 2. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. And the first question comes from Andrew Schmidt with Citi. Please go ahead.

Hi, Greg. Hey, Mimi. Thanks for taking my question this morning. If I could just drill down on the core revenue growth for a moment, maybe just unpack the first quarter performance a little bit. And I know you managed the full year, so I don't want to get too caught up on the first quarter performance, but maybe just a few more details on how core performance in the first quarter. And then as the year progresses, can you talk about the trajectory we should expect there in the drivers as the year progresses? Thank you very much.

So I'll start out with the core attainment, because that could be a combination of what you're doing. And I'll let Mimi talk about the specifics on the revenue. So, you know, six core wins. I will tell you that there were a couple of pushes that we had due to the hurricane and, you know, or the hurricanes that happened. And we had a few deals that we anticipated that would have closed in the first quarter. They got pushed to the second quarter. So we didn't lose them. They just were tiny. And obviously we're not going to push people to try to sign a contract during those type of challenges. So that's part of it. But honestly, the exciting part that we highlighted was that we continue to win the multibillion dollar opportunities, including the seven billion. And we have several others that we expect to come here and into fruition as well. So that part of, I think, the potential part of your question is on the sales side. And I'll let Mimi handle the revenue component.

So as Greg alluded to just now, you know, demand remains strongly intact and solid. And you should expect that as the year goes on across all of the segments, you know, in particular, if you're a questioner on core, we're going to continue to see the key growth strong, the installation of prior year sales. And so we expect, you know, similar to how you called it out in your note, that Q1 will be a floor for revenue growth with the subsequent acceleration as the year progresses. So nothing particular to call out from a cadence perspective. I just think you're going to be a very strong second half.

And I think one other point, Andrew, and really for everybody else, is I think it does point out that we still had a record quarter. So if you look at our complementary products and the things that we're doing, you know, tangentially to just core wins, you know, having a record quarter even with, you know, six core wins, which again, we typically have a, Q1 is typically light for us anyway coming off of, you know, the 20 or so that we won in the Q4 of last year. But the reality is it really was pushes that happened from the hurricane or it would have been a fairly normal first quarter.

Got it. Yeah, that makes sense. It's good to see the balance in the bookings there with the record sales quarter. Maybe just in the wake of the election, could you just remind us how Jack Henry is impacted by consolidation from an underlying revenue growth perspective and then, you know, whether this cycle, obviously it's very early, but, you know, whether this cycle should be any different than what we've seen historically. Thanks so much.

So again, I'll start. Mimi can add on. I think there's a couple things. So one, what is baked into 25? I don't think the election results will change much of what we have baked for 25. You know, knowing, you know, obviously we have a president that we've seen before, so we know a little bit more of his playbook and what we should expect related to regulatory, you know, hopefully some improvement in the timing of M&A. But for our institutions, you know, we do have, you know, several already lined up with acquisitions that will be happening in the second half of our year in 25 that are already baked into the number. If something else accelerates, then obviously that would be additional gravy for us. But we've already added, and I think we mentioned this on the last call, we've already added additional conversion teams and migration teams for both banking and credit union based on the feedback that we've gotten from our clients. And of course we get knowledge of deals that are going to happen very early on so they can't get those slots. And so, you know, so we're working through that. But we'll see what happens. I think the regulatory challenges that, you know, we see today, hopefully there's some lessening of that. And then obviously the approach that they've taken in the past regime on really slowing down M&A and the timing of getting approvals, we would hope and expect that that would enhance. And again, the more we're winning and the more we're growing asset sizes with our own institutions, which we've been articulating the 27% bank growth over the last four years and 34% credit union growth over the last four years, that continues to position us in more of the driver's seat in a lot of these opportunities.

Yeah, I think spot on Greg. The only thing I would add is given last year and the guidance for this year for deconversion revenue, it's hard to imagine that, you know, essentially next year you don't see, you know, the impact of M&A needing to hire deconversion revenue. But again, as we said, you never know. That's really hard to forecast. And it really depends on the institution and where they are on the renewal cycle. But I would not fake in anything else for this year given the timing of the turnover of the new administration.

Got it. Thank you very much. Really appreciate the comments.

Thank you.

And the next question comes from Vasu Govil with KBW. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you for taking my questions. I guess first one for you, Greg. I wanted to ask about the Bano retail wins. I think you said 12 new wins in the quarter, which, you know, is a good number, but if I look back, it's probably one of the slowest we've seen in the last several quarters. Just anything to call out there, anything timing related like you talked about the core. And then I know you have identified third party cores also to sell Bano into just, you know, how is that effort going in any color around that?

Yeah, good question. So on the number of wins, I don't, there's nothing, no concern there. I think a lot of it is timing. You know, a lot of Bano deals are tied at this point in time, two core wins. You know, we're still moving customers over from, you know, the old platform and we're actually getting ready to announce, we've told our customers that we'll be announcing a sun setting at the Neteller platform, which again will help accelerate, you know, some additional ones that have kind of been lagged to move. But the reality is no concern there at all. And to get 18 Bano business is very much in line with what we had last year. And, you know, fourth quarter, you really, you know, that's always a heavy sales win for us. But comparing it to the 2-1 of last year, we were fairly much in line with that particular quarter. Related to the outside of the base, so this really mostly applies to the Bano than it does to some of our other products that we're taking outside the base. But, you know, honestly, we've had some challenges with some of our competitors being as open as they say they are. And so we've been trying to work through some of the timing and costs that they want to, you know, to embark upon us. And honestly, as a byproduct of that, we have really looked at a different way of approaching this. And I don't necessarily want to share what we're doing because, you know, I don't want it to get out to our competitors. But it is a way for us to bypass some of the typical integration points that you have to have and do it a different way. And we're working that path parallel. And it's really more appropriate and applicable to the Bano platform. The Bano platform has a lot more API integrations that need to happen, which makes it more difficult for some of those integration work. So what we're going to do is be able to leverage some of the things that we're doing in MOOC and be able to offer that through a process that will allow us to get outside the base. And we're going to do that in parallel with what we're doing with the other outside the base initiatives. So no change at this point in timeline. Just a little bit of a change in probably the level of productivity and success that we have hoped to have, you know, by the end of this fiscal year. So more to come on that. But we are taking a different approach. And I think it's going to be more successful for us.

Great. Thank you for that, Guller. And a quick one for you, Mimi. Just on the free gas flow conversion, like anything, any change to the 65% guide that you had given us last quarter? Just any put some things there.

So I feel comfortable with the guide remaining in check at the 65 to 75. There were a couple of people that noted Q1 at the 50% cash flow. And I would just remind everyone that the annual, the trailing 12 months is the most better indicator of the free cash flow because there are times, particularly Q4 to Q1, and the timing of the payments related to the annual maintenance. And as I called out on last quarter's call, Q4 benefited about $60 million from a higher mix being paid in Q4 than this Q1. So if you think about that Q1 50%, it really is closer to the 100% like we've seen in prior year Q1. But I think the 72% should give everyone comfort that we are well within that guide, full year guidance frame.

Great. Thank you very much.

Welcome.

And the next question comes from Reina Kumar with Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Greg and Mimi. Thanks for taking my question. So one of your competitors recently called out a competitive win of less than $10 billion asset bank. I'm just wondering if you're seeing any increased competition for banks and credit unions in core processing in your focus area?

No. I mean, Reina said, you know, we compete with, you know, we've always competed with that particular company in that space and, you know, we don't win them all. We win a lot and a lot more than anybody else, but we sure don't win them all. But from a standpoint of competitive pressure, no. You know, that particular deal, I kind of know what happened. And, you know, there was a significant difference in price for sure, but the reality is we're continuing to be, you know, very successful in that space, including, like I said, the $7 billion opportunity we just won, plus a lot of the renewals that we've been able to do over the last, you know, 18 months are all at our larger, you know, client basis. So it's, you know, anywhere from the 15 to the 30 that we've been renewing, they're all staying with Jack Henry. So, you know, there's no concerns at this point.

Understood. That's very helpful. The economy seems to be showing more resilience, evidenced by recent earnings reports from other payment companies. Do you think if this macro environment persists, there could be upside tier 25 to 40 basis points, margin expansion targets for this fiscal year?

Yeah, I think at this point it's probably a little too early to say for us, because we're just closing our first quarter. We do already have a pretty substantial second half planned that reflects robust growth. But yeah, particularly in the area of transaction and card volumes, we anticipate growing, spending in the spring, but there is always an upside. You know, the economy and consumer sentiment is stronger.

Appreciate all the color. Thank you. Thank you. Very welcome.

And the next question comes from Jason Kupferberg with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Thanks, guys. Good morning. I just wanted to start on the second half, revenue growth outlook, and definitely appreciate the clarity on Q2 to get our models tuned. I guess you've got to be at about 9% in the second half to get to the midpoint of the full year. And you talked about the second half, you talked about implementation cadence, but can you maybe just go a layer deeper into the visibility you have, factors that are going to drive that acceleration and just clarify, you know, which revenue lines that's going to be most pronounced in? It sounds like a lot of it is core, but just wanted to check in on that.

Great question, Jason. Let me give you a little bit more color on some of the drivers that make us feel quite confident for the second half of the year. So first, I would call out the hardware last year was quite strong. That's a harder comp in the first half this year than second half. So in the first half of this year, hardware is about, you know, a $7 million drag impact. That eases up a little bit in the second half of the year. We expect cloud revenues, you know, the record growth to continue. The impact of new sales impacts. We've seen strong growth in the password payments adoption, and we're starting to see send blow. So I think that's another opportunity in the second half. A card is, I just said, Serena's question. You know, we expect the spring to pick up a little bit, and we do have a lower Q4 comp. And then I think just as new products continue to ramp, things like Defender accelerating, we're having implementations, consulting revenue and the transaction, and then overall digital adoption by two to S&B strategies. So the impact of all that plus the implementation for all the prior years of sales success coming on board gives us confidence in the second half.

Okay, and just talking about core wins for a second, I think you mentioned six in the quarter. I know it's a typical year. You target 50 to 55. It's still early. We know this is never ratable. It's usually lumpy by quarter, and I think you said a couple of deals slipped because of the hurricanes, but I wanted to just check in on overall pipeline confidence and visibility, and the 50 to 55 is still a reasonable zip code for this fiscal year based on how you see the pipeline converting over the next few quarters.

It is, and again, we're still, you know, we're tracking well. Last year we did the 15, you know, more than 1 billion, and we're tracking again nice with that, with already having three in the first quarter, which again is typically a lighter quarter for us, and not just a billion dollar deal. It's, you know, one was a $7 billion deal. So absolutely on track, and the pipeline is as robust as it's ever been. It's at an all-time high again, even after the record Q4 and year and record Q1. So still very confident in the team's ability to go hit our normal numbers.

Okay, thank you. Thank you.

And the next question comes from Will Nance with Goldman Sachs, please go ahead.

Hey guys, thanks for taking the question. You know, just another one on the second half, acceleration, it's nice to hear the confidence there. And I just, you know, it sounds like most of that is more kind of implementation and tough comps from the prior year. Maybe there's a little bit easier of a comp in payments in the back half of the year, but I guess big picture when you think about, you know, exiting the year at a stronger growth rate, you know, maybe excluding, you know, having an easier comp and payments, is there anything in that back half growth rate that you would caution us against run rating into the first half of the following year? You know, not exactly asking for, you know, following your guidance, but just, you know, wanting to kind of understand if they feel like that's a good run rate given the implementation schedule for the following few quarters.

I appreciate your question, Will. I would say FY26 is a little bit far away to give a cadence feel yet. And as we said, I wouldn't recommend taking any one quarter and annualizing that. So I think as we get a little closer, we'll certainly give a feel, but I think there are some things with new products, the sales implementation, faster payment adoption, wild growth that are a continuation and not just, you know, kind of a one time, like some of the grow over ease it will be.

Yeah, the only thing I'll add to that, Will, is just much as we described it, the investor day, you know, our goal is to continue to, you know, inch up to the levels of closer to the 8%, all the things we're doing, we're hoping and believing that that is going to get us there, but the move piece will just have been launched at the end of the year and seeing the level of success there, much as Mimi said with a lot of the new products and continued implementations and getting through some of the cues that we have. And obviously even in some of the things that we've been able to get launched in the in tech modernization, things around data broker and all that. So much time still needs to take place before we feel confident with giving you any more additional guidance, but the reality is we have all the things in motion and we do have an all time sales, you know, pipeline to go make it happen.

Got it, okay, I appreciate that figure I would ask. And then, I guess any color on just how you're thinking about capital allocation and the M&A environment. You know, we touched a little bit on bank M&A, but just any kind of capital allocation priorities come to mind and what might be an environment that's more conducive to M&A?

Yeah, I would say we're steadfast in our prioritization from a capital allocation perspective. We're continuing to invest in our own future growth through innovation. We continue to support our long standing dividend policy. We pay down the debt, we're continuing to pay down the debt throughout the year and as we start to build into a more positive cash flow position post paying down that debt, we'll always continue to look at, you know, share repurchases as an option and M&A is always on the table. It's just there hasn't been any interesting prospects over the last several quarters. So hopefully if people think between the interest rates coming down and M&A being more conducive, hopefully there'll be some interesting prospects. But again, that would have to be not only financially attractive, be an acceleration to our tech roadmap journey.

Okay, understood. Appreciate you taking the question today.

Of course, thank you, Will. Thank you,

Will. The next question comes from Dominic Gabriel with CompassPoint. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning everybody. Thank you so much for taking the question. So I guess I was just curious if there was any change in the expected pace in de-emphasizing some of the lower growth, less profitable businesses. You touched a little bit on it earlier in the call, but if you could give some extra color there.

Yeah, it was a great question. And honestly, I was gonna bring it up even in Will's question, so I'm glad you did. So we are focused on it. Some of these things, as we mentioned through Investor Day and individual meetings is that this process of product rationalization is going to take several years for it to completely take fruition. There are some opportunities that we're exploring on whether they would be small businesses of a potential divestiture, as we talked about before. I already mentioned a couple of products that we've been announcing sun settings. So those take, we typically get two years for that to happen. Some of that will allow us to move customers faster to the better margin and faster advancing products like Abano, Neteller to Abano, and Yellow Hammer to financial crimes and things along that line. But there's other things that we're doing that will take a little bit more time and scrutiny that we're still working through, but it is a priority. We actually just came out of our strategy meeting and it continues to be a priority and we have a team focused on it.

Yeah, the only other color I would lay on there for your question, is doubtful, you know, but it's doubtful at this point that you see like one big chunk in a quarter. Some of these, we're gonna pursue different admin paths, whether it be sun setting, whether it be just more cash tally, whether it be actual looking at divestiture. So I doubt that they stacked up one on top of each other timing-wise to have that big of a noticeable impact to any one quarter. Obviously, we would call that out. But I think it's just over time, you'll see the improvement of that nine key revenue, be less of a drive on the total performance.

And it should, based on what we've been doing in the analyzation, it's also going to help us with some of the level of tech modernization in the shared services environment and some of the cost containment and expense control back to our focus on continued margin expansion. So all of those things will help us drive both the revenue growth as well as the margin.

Yeah, for sure. And it was nice to see the margin being better than you were expecting this quarter. I guess, you know, the election results basically just happened. So I'm just gonna go back to this for a second. You know, do you think that, do you have any sense from your clients that they were holding up certain tech investments until they understood who the winner was gonna be? And do you think that there's incremental tech spend that they're likely gonna pursue that maybe was not captured in just the budget growth that you guys talk about once or twice a year in your surveys? Do you think that could come through in like complimentary products where they're gonna start making some of those discretionary investments because of how the election went and maybe more or less? Thanks.

Yeah, honestly, I don't at this point just because we've been so direct and have gotten such positive feedback on what they do want to do, which, you know, all make collective sense regardless of who was in the White House. Now, you know, I don't know what I don't know. There could be opportunities that happen through the M&A environment and, you know, folks are looking at opportunities to, you know, maybe purchase, you know, have an M&A and there could be products that get accelerated because of an opportunity that that particular bank had or didn't have. But I would say based on what we know today and the most recent feedback we literally just got a month ago at our CEO forum, I don't see that necessarily as of today.

All right, thank you.

Thanks. And the next question comes from Peter Heckman with DA Davidson. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. Greg, I just wanted to see with the JHA user conference connect how much of a priority or how much emphasis are you putting on the modern core modular platform and how is that resonating with clients and is it your sense that some of these, you know, multi-billion dollar institutions are really looking for a vendor that has a pretty well thought out and underway process to migrate towards an unbundled core. I mean, how important is that in terms of their decision making?

Yeah, you know, from the prospects that were there and as I mentioned, we had 50 prospects and I met personally with 15 of them for a period of time. Yeah, the strategy of what we're doing. So it's not just about the unbundling of the core. It's just the strategy of, you know, taking the core into the public cloud and not just core but also some of the non-core products that we built, understanding the value of being in the public cloud. So those prospects, of course our clients, you know, as well, these prospects have told us that they're not seeing that same level of conversation with whom they're with today. So yes, that strategy plays, you know, strongly in it but it also plays the other things that we emphasize. You know, our culture, our service, the other innovative technology that we've been building through the years with whether that be financial crimes or what we've done in Pay Center or what we've done in our enterprise account opening and things along that line. So it is a combination of things, Pete, that drive this but the overall strategy, not just core, but the overall strategy is what is gravitating them to the -in-the

-box. If I may add on, I think also what's really resonating is that shared services approach. So as we build componentry for the tech modernization, that's supporting and enhancing the experience on the existing cores today. And so that's giving people comfort that there's innovation on the cores that they might go to today as well as where they're going tomorrow.

Yeah, one last point, and I did emphasize this, was the open philosophy. You know, when they walk into our tech showcase and see 250, you know, fintechs that are there and versus other client conferences, you know, they also, they know we are putting our money where our mouth is, and the reality is they understand that Jack Henry is going to allow them to pick what is the best product for them. And so, you know, that is a big part too because they're not getting that same level of cooperation today. And if they do want to go with a fintech or do an -the-base integration, as I referenced before, you know, they're typically getting charged an arm and a leg to do it.

Mm-hmm, okay, that's helpful. And then can you just, you haven't talked too, too much about the loan, loan origination platform. Can you talk a little bit about some of your thoughts there in terms of solutions on the lending side and whether or not that's something that we might hear a little bit more about over the next few years?

Yeah, and I expect you to hear more starting in 2025. So we've been working on combining the loan-vanaged platform now has been built to be a single consumer and commercial platform, and we've taken the account-opening software, what we call OpenAnywhere, and we've added that into the solution. So it's now called Enterprise Account Opening. And it will allow the institution to, you know, it competes very nicely within CNO or anybody else out in the market today. And we will be in what we call early adopter in January of 2025. So it's coming up. And so we'll start to have some of our customers, you know, kind of working through that with us. But we are very excited about that and what opportunities it will continue to bring to our financial institution.

And is it top priority, you know, that the EOs and BIOs tell us from our strategic -to-end survey? For

sure. Good deal. All right, I appreciate the feedback. I'll get back in the queue. Thanks, Pete.

The next question comes from Chris Kennedy with William Blair. Please go ahead. Yeah, good morning.

Thanks for taking the question. Greg, you mentioned Data Broker a couple times. Can you just remind us of what the opportunity is there and just maybe talk about the CFPB rule on open banking and how that drives that?

Yeah, so let me start with the CFPB rule. So 1033, if you remember back to some of the comments that we have made in prior quarters where we had eliminated screen scraping in our BANL digital platform, we're the only provider that's 100% eliminated screen scraping. So we were already ahead of what was coming out with 1033 knowing that there was going to be something. We now have direct API integrations into eight of the leading financial data aggregators. So the big names that you've heard of, like Finicity and Yodely and Plaid, Intuit and MX, but there's several others. And I think we have like eight or nine more in the queue to do full API. So, and as a reminder, this rule does not impact core. It really impacts digital banking providers. So we are significantly ahead of anybody in the space today for that, for 1033. Related to Data Broker, so Data Broker, we have a few clients that are live that have been testing this in our early adopter. But the reality is that we are bringing into a single data repository, the ability for our customers to get their core data, their digital data, their payments data, their fraud data, their lending data, all from Jack Henry in a single repository, as well as we are giving access to third party, whoever third parties they use to be able to bring that data in as well. And of course, we got all the guardrails and things that we need to do to make sure that that happens. So we're just at early stages of bringing some of the groups in. So we have core in there today. We have digital in there today. We'll have payments in by the end of the calendar year, and we'll have fraud in by the end of the first quarter of 2025. So we expect more sales to occur, obviously, as you get more and more of the data in there. But we've been testing it out. It's going really well. As far as uptick in revenue, probably not much in 2025, but we do expect it to be something that will help drive 2026.

Great, thanks for taking the question.

Sure.

And the next question comes from John Davis with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, guys. Me and me, we talk a lot about the second half, rev Excel, the one that's on margins. And the guide implies margins will be up somewhere close to 100 basis points in the back after the year. Obviously, you have revenue accelerating, easier comp. Anything else to call out on the margin front?

Yeah, so I would say the first half is a little bit more pronounced from the headwinds we've seen both at software usage, and additionally, I would call out Q2 is a bit of a tough comp because of VDIP impact. We had the departure last year at Q2, but not the replacement. And so that's a bit of a grow over from a head count from the roughly like 250 heads that are gonna be Q2-25 versus Q2-24. So I think those things make a little bit challenging in the first half, but as we get to the second half, it certainly aligns to our revenue growth. So I feel pretty comfortable with the full year guide of the 25 to 40 basis points.

Okay, great. I think, Brad, you called out 20% increase in Bano users year over year. Is Bano for business a meaningful contributor to that? And if so, is it safe to assume that Bano revenue is growing well above that 20% user growth number?

Yeah, the Bano business is not a meaningful contributor. It is a contributor, but as far as the growth, it truly is about our implementation numbers. And so as we add more and more business customers, yes, there can be some additional users, but that growth of 20% has been really been driven through the retail platform. But as we continue to add, remember, the way we price Bano business is that the retail customer, regardless of how many retail customers they have, they pay that same amount and it's kind of an add-on fee to what the retail piece is. So as we continue to get more penetration and some things that we are doing to actually do adoption activities, I think that that number will become more and more meaningful. But as far as the revenue growth, we've been kind of consistent over the last year, two years on where we've been on the revenue growth and digital stuff. And remember, digital is more than just Bano. Right, right. All right, thanks, Matt.

The next question comes from James Fossett with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks very much. Good morning, everybody. I wanted to ask Greg really quickly, you mentioned the implementation cues and just wondering how those are trending broadly and how are you thinking right now about the puts and takes between the margin expansion you're delivering versus potential for additional resource allocation to help speed up those implementations?

Yeah, thanks, James. Yeah, we look at that literally every month as part of our discussions with our teams during what we do variance reviews with them. And so we balance that very well. We've added people in our financial crimes defender group last year, significant number, honestly, to do that. Some of the implementations are, in some cases, especially in financial crimes, they can take up to six months because of the data that needs to get transferred over. So some of it isn't just a people thing, some of it is purely just waiting. The other thing is is that a lot of these can be tied to a core implementation. So they get delayed till the core gets done as well. So, but we absolutely evaluate the need to expedite the revenue flow and balance it against the operating margin. So, but we do that literally every month.

Got it. And then wondering, it's been a few months since you announced the partnership with Move. Seems like an interesting potential product, both for Jack Henry as well as Jack Henry's customers. Just any update on kind of progress there and when we may start to see that enter the market commercially?

Yeah, so lots of progress. We've made, honestly, a lot of advancement, even since Investor Day when we publicly announced it. We did a full demo of this at our client conference in front of the 4,000 people that were there and got rave reviews for them being able to see that. As far as timing, as I announced, we're on time to be able to deliver this to our early adopter Bano clients in May of 2025. And so we're on track to do that.

That's great. Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Ken Sutrowski with Autonomous Research. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to circle back on the cloud migration. I think you said cloud revenue was 30% of revenue growing low double digits. I think you have 70, 75% of clients on the private cloud. Can you just give us a sense for how much runway there is for cloud revenue to continue to grow at these double digit rates? Are you seeing any traction in the public cloud yet? Just trying to get a sense for how sustainable that growth is on the cloud side and maybe where the revenue shows up across the segments as well. Thank you.

Yeah, hey Ken, I'll start with just kind of the migration and then let Mimi go through the revenue component of it. But so we are at 73% right now in the private cloud. And so we don't expect to get to 100%. And we expect to be somewhere in the low to mid 90s because there'll just be some of the customers that just don't want to move. But we have several years. We're still expecting this year to do our normal 40ish from an in to out. And so there'll be somewhere in those numbers. And we're really on track. We had based on first quarter of last year versus first quarter of this year for an in to out was very similar in number. And the other thing that's happening is that we are down to a lot of our larger clients. So even if we move less or fewer in a quarter, they typically are larger clients but bring more of an impact as well. And it just as a reminder on average between banks and credit unions about a .75% increase. So that is part of where we are. As far as years of runway, we expect to be three, four or five more years of that at some pace. But in the same time, I announced earlier about the deposit only core being ready in 2026. So we could see some lift at that point in time of folks moving either directly from in-house to the public cloud or from the private cloud to the public cloud or being in both. Cause it will be a deposit only core in 2026 as we build out the rest of the core components. So more to come on that, but we still have some runway and they are larger customers.

Yeah, I mean, I think Greg hit on all those alien points that there's still a runway to go. The clients are potentially larger. Also our clients grow, we grow with our clients as they grow. So even though ones that are already in our private cloud environment as they had more accounts, as they grow and expand, we're going to continue to get revenue growth with them. So that's the only other thing I would call out from just continuing to be a strong growth engine for up in the future.

Okay, great. And then, and I think you said non-GAAP revenue would grow 6% in the second quarter. Can you just remind us of the building blocks, I guess by segment, just to get to that 6%?

Yeah, I think we can follow up offline in terms of the components, but I would just say like on a whole, I don't expect to see a lot of different changes from the momentum we've had in the Q1 in terms of for the segment. We still think that for cards, Q2 is going to be a little bit better than Q1, but it's still probably a modest spend expectation. You feel as cloud is our slowest quarter in Q2, hardware has less of a drive than Q1, but still a drive in Q2 as well. So, and you have some drive points, some small things like call center and item processing is great. So I think that's what's leading us to that 6% and then taking off solidly from there in the back half.

Okay, thanks so much.

Thanks, Ken.

And the next question comes from Dave Koning with Baird. Please go ahead.

Yeah, hey guys. A couple of things. First of all, card processing, you put that in the process with 5% growth, last quarter was 8% growth, and I know like the networks and stuff were pretty stable growth. Was there anything in there just to call out why that decelerated a bit?

Yeah, I think our transaction volume was pretty much in line. I would say where we've been on the positive side, we've seen higher grant from a faster payment staff and that's really taking off. The bill pay from the rest of it, it's a modest kind of rower from the ETF business, a little slower than prior year, but moderate, modest growth. So I think that's pretty much in line.

Okay. So we've spent a little year too.

Yeah, okay. And then the one other thing, and we talked about this last quarter too, interest income remains high, and you guys had a ramp kind of a year and a half or so later than I would say a lot of other, I guess you had some ramp a while ago, but you've really ramped that up a lot in the last year or so now, and again, it was really high in Q1. Does that stay, what created kind of a little later ramp in that and does that stay kind of stable through the year?

Mostly I would say it was due to just the timing of negotiations with some of our bank counterparties in terms of getting more attractive yields on those balances. It does have some correlation with interest rates, so I think it's pretty stable for Q2. We'll see what the Fed does in the back half of the year and what case they do, but I would say you'll see some correlation with interest rates and interest income.

Okay, thank you. Thanks, Dave. Thanks, Dave.

This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Van Sherrod for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Wyatt. We look forward to hosting you at next week's shareholder meeting either in person or on the webcast, and in the coming weeks, we will be attending various invest events in the US and Europe. We would again like to thank all Jack Henry Associates for their hard work and dedication, which have contributed to our outstanding results. Thank you for joining us today. Wyatt, please provide the replay number.

The replay number for today's call is -344-7529, and the access code is 6482509. The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.