This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk14: Welcome to the Lumet Vascular Q4 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. J.J. Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer of Lumet Vascular. Please go ahead.
spk10: Thank you, Operator. Good afternoon and thank you for joining us on our Q4 2023 Conference Call. With me on today's call is our CEO, George Lumet, and our President, Dave Roberts. Before we begin, I'll read our Safe Harbor Statement. Today we will make some forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the accuracy of which is subject to risk and uncertainties. Wherever possible, we will try to identify those forward-looking statements by using words such as believe, expect, anticipate, pursue, forecast, and similar expressions. Our forward-looking statements are based on our estimates and assumptions as of today, February 27, 2024, and should not be relied upon as representing our estimates or views on any subsequent date. Please refer to the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information and the risk factors in our most recent 10-K and subsequent SEC filings, including disclosure of the factors that could cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied. During this call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which include organic sales growth as well as operating income, operating expense, and EPS excluding special charges. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures discussed in this call is contained in the associated press release and is available in the Investor Relations section of our website, .lemait.com. I'll now turn the call over to George Lemait.
spk06: Thanks, JJ. Q4 was an excellent quarter with 19% sales growth, a .1% gross margin, and 46% up-income growth. I'll focus my remarks on the top line, Salesforce activities, and some regulatory updates. Geographically, EMEA was up 21% in Q4, the Americas 20%, and APAC 11%. By product, bovine patches were up 18%, allografts 52%, valvatomes 12%, and carotid shunt 16%. Distribution of the porcine patch also added $1.5 million of sales in the quarter. The return to hospital by staff and patients, ASP increases, ample product supply, and the growth of our Salesforce drove Q4 sales growth. We ended 2023 with 136 reps worldwide. By December 2024, we expect to employ approximately 150 reps. To accommodate rep growth in the North America, we recently promoted three regional sales managers to become area sales managers. This additional management bandwidth should enable us to hire, train, and manage more RSMs and reps. The revenues from the 2020 artographed acquisition, coupled with recent sales growth, have made our North American territories too large. In 2023, our average North American territory had $2 million in sales. Over the years, we found smaller territories enabled tighter relationships with surgeons. So we've begun dividing some of the larger territories. This should reduce windshield time too. In Europe, we also remain in growth mode. We plan to open a Paris office in Q2, which should improve our connections with French surgeons and hostels, as well as our eight French sales reps. France is our sixth largest country by sales. Turning to Asia. I visited four of the six APAC offices in early February. Things look great over there. Our Tokyo branch is celebrating 20 years, and we've just opened offices in Seoul and Bangkok. In our first direct year in Korea, 2023 sales reached $1.7 million and our profits were $250,000. Both figures exceeded expectations. In Thailand, our first full year of direct sales should be about $1.6 million in 2024. Our Chinese team is also performing well and grew 40% last year. The Artigraft CE file was submitted in December 2023, and we also plan to file for Artigraft approval in Canada, Australia, and several other APAC countries this year. We also plan to make Zeniture filings for our peripheral and cardiac products by 2025 in China. And we're also making the MDR transition in Europe. As you know, Brussels has extended the MDR deadline to 2027. 22 of our product categories need this new MDR CE mark, so this is a considerable undertaking. We currently own three of these new MDR CE marks. Also in Europe, our Allograft filings have been made in Ireland and Germany. An approval in either of those countries will be our first approval of Allograft in the European Union. To conclude, 19% sales growth and a gross margin recovery produced 46% up-income growth in Q4. Our growing profitability and cash on hand provide safety and strategic optionality. With that, I'll turn it over to JJ.
spk10: Thanks, George. 2023 was an excellent year. We posted $193 million in sales, an increase of 20% on a reported basis and 17% organically. Our operating income increased 37% on a reported basis. If 2022 was our post-COVID rehiring year with 141 ads, then 2023 was the hiring constraint year with only 23 ads. This headcount control, along with our strong sales results and an improved gross margin, led to a 19% operating margin in 2023 versus 17% in 2022. Separately, our cash balance has improved by $22 million in 2023 to $105 million. Turning to the quarter, in Q4 2023, we posted a gross margin of 68.1%, up 450 basis points year over year. This increase was driven by higher ASPs, productivity improvements, and a weaker dollar. The benefits of a larger and more efficient manufacturing team have come onto the P&L. Our Allagraft manufacturing team had a strong Q4, and quality costs remain in check. In retrospect, our manufacturing hiring surge was well-timed with the global return to hospitals. Operating expenses in Q4 2023 were $23.1 million, an increase of 21% versus Q4 2022. The increase was driven largely by higher sales commissions, more sales professionals, and $700,000 of one-time reversals in Q4 2022. Q4 2023 operating income increased 46% year over year to $10.2 million, driven by higher sales and an improved gross margin. The operating margin in Q4 was 21%, up from 17% in the prior year period. Separately, we recently went live with a new ERP system in the United States. This system should improve real-time reporting, streamline financial processes, and provide more sophisticated analytics. Implementation at our overseas entities will take place in 2025 and 2026. We estimate that we will spend approximately $7 to $8 million on this project, and the annual P&L impact will be approximately $1 million per year. With respect to guidance, we are forecasting improved operating leverage in 2024, driven by restrained operating expense growth and an improved gross margin. Our guidance includes an operating margin in 2024 of 21% versus 19% in 2023 and 17% reported in 2022. For more details, please see our business outlook issued in today's press release, but a few Q1 highlights include reported sales growth of 10%, gross margin of 68.5%, operating income growth of 33%, and EPS growth of 42%. And for the full year 2024 guidance includes reported sales growth of 10%, gross margin of 68%, operating income growth of 22%, and EPS growth of 23%.
spk16: With
spk10: that, I'll turn it back over to the
spk16: operator for questions.
spk14: In order to ask questions, please press TAR11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your questions, please press TAR11 again. Please stand by while we'll compile the Q&A roster.
spk15: Thank you.
spk14: Your
spk15: first question
spk14: comes from the line up, Siraj Kaila with Oppenheimer. Your line is now open.
spk13: Hi, George, JJ. Can you hear me all right? Yes. Gentlemen, apologies for the background noise. So, George, let me start out, you know, in your prepared remarks, you talked about characters, or maybe it was JJ's comments,
spk11: but when you
spk13: split the territory, let's say from 2 million to let's say a million, can you walk us through the thought process in terms of sales rep, commercial retention? You know, how does the process go about?
spk06: Okay, sure. And of course, Siraj, this is completely normal medical device activity, right? So this is how, exactly how sales forces grow. It's like an amoeba. The thing gets big, you've got to cut it in half, and it becomes too big for them to handle it. If a rep is running around Ohio trying to cover $2 million worth of medical device sales, of course some of the smaller hospitals start to feel ignored. And so very high level, you would clearly split it and put one guy in, pick a city, Cleveland, and one guy in Columbus, and they would now split Ohio, if you will. So I think that's sort of the amoeba aspect of it, it's perfectly normal. And then what else would you like to know about what happens there? I was just curious in terms
spk13: of, I understand it's a normal process in the industry. I was more specifically curious in terms of usually do you encounter any sales force retention issues, hence by definition any concerns about you?
spk06: Sure. No, I don't have particular concern. I do agree with you. Anytime you touch anything near the sales force, you sort of get near higher turnover. But this is perfectly normal and you have to do it, or else you won't get good service to those surgeons in the hospital. And on that score, Siraj, maybe just, I know you didn't exactly ask this question, but we're into this thing. I read some article recently. It's called The Big Stay. I don't know if anyone's heard that. And so as opposed to The Great Resignation, we're now into The Big Stay. And LEMATE experienced dramatically reduced turnover in last year. I think our number was like 7.5 percent, down from somewhere, I'm going to get it wrong, somewhere around 14 or 15 percent the year before. We're always three or four points better than our Massachusetts manufacturing colleague companies or peer companies. But major decrease in turnover. And notably with the sales force, one thing to further mention, Siraj, specifically, remember last year we had this massive surge in procedures and we grew organically 17 percent. Usually LEMATE before that had grown about 9 percent organically. And as a result, the W-2s in the sales force, how much we paid the sales reps, was dramatically higher in 2023. And as a result, they stuck around to get those paychecks and you would have seen them start leaving January 15th, January 25th when they were getting their final commissions and bonuses. We haven't seen that at all. I mean, there's been one or two here and there, but we have not seen that at all. And so we're a very, very happy time, in my opinion, in the sales force. Great results. Commission checks are huge, et cetera, et cetera. And Siraj,
spk10: part of your question was how do the commissions change when you split the territories? And as you recall, we compensate the reps based on their performance versus a gross profit dollars quota. And so when the territory is split, we obviously commensurately split the gross profit dollar quarters or change them based on whatever the new answer is. And then their compensation, their tier that they get paid, doesn't change, but what it's linked to does change. So it's kind of, quote unquote, fair when you make the split. There isn't a big topic necessarily around that, that they're obviously going to make half of what they were making before.
spk13: Fair enough. Gentlemen, I'll quickly ask my two follow-ups to avoid the background noise. So, George, I'd love to get your updated thoughts on your M&A strategy looking forward. And the second question I have is I'd love to get your perspective. Valvoline Latomes grew 12% year over year. Obviously, there was the best CLI study, and that has really seen pull through for you guys in terms of growth. Are you all seeing any counterbalancing going on with the Basel II study, you know, which gave somewhat opposite results? Just curious, if any, onto your thoughts on that front. Thank you for taking my questions again.
spk06: Siraj, I'm going to pass your M&A call over to Dave, question rather, over to Dave, and then I'll come back to the Valvatone question.
spk08: Hi, Siraj. Great to hear from you. And yeah, with respect to the acquisition strategy, I'd say the criteria are consistent from previous calls. Of course, we're focused on open vascular targets with more than 5 million of revenue. There are about 25 of them altogether. Beyond that, we are and have been hunting in adjacent markets, maybe first cardiac surgery and endovascular. If anything, I think we learned from the artographed acquisition a few years ago that hunting larger is probably a good thing. It will move the needle more. So we've been looking at a little bit larger targets and also we have more cash, of course, to do an acquisition with 105 million of cash and leaving 20 million on the balance sheet. Plus, maybe three times our 46 million LTME, but we could fund 225 million of purchase price, excluding an equity raise or the target. So I think we're just consistently looking out in the same hunting grounds where we have been and hopefully someday we'll be able to report back that we've done a transaction.
spk06: And Siraj, as to your best CLI question, yeah, in the first half of the year, I feel like we got excited about the best CLI study as it relates to valvulotomes. And then, of course, Basel comes out, the European study, Basel II comes out, and it's sort of the antidote to best CLI. Best CLI basically says do leg bypasses first, open surgery, and then Basel II comes and says, no, no, you can do stents and angioplasty. You're going to get great results that way too. So in some ways, you do have surgeons that want to do open surgery saying, I listen to best CLI. And then you have surgeons and angiologists who want to use angioplasty and stents who come out and say, I heard about Basel II. So there was a little bit of a retrenchment, I would say. For the exact fact here, we grew valvulotomes 12 percent in dollars. That's 11 percent organic. And units were up 5 percent last year. In fact, in general, across our portfolio, units were up 5 percent. So our first year with Basel II, I would say, you know, valvulotomes didn't go crazy good, although that 5 percent was better than the slightly decreased units of 21 and 22. So 2021 and 2022 decrease was around 3 or 4 percent in units. And then it bounced up again post-Basil. I guess I'd say make of it what you will. It seems like it was a good thing, but it then got counteracted by Basel II.
spk16: Thank you. Thanks a lot, Saraj. Those are great questions.
spk14: Again, that is tar 11 to ask
spk15: a question. And one moment for your next question.
spk14: Your next question comes from the line of Danielle Stouter, which the GMT Security Line is now open.
spk23: Yeah, great. Can you guys hear me? Yes, Danny.
spk24: Great. So first off, I just wanted to ask on gross margins. You know, very healthy guidance. Great to see. And you talked about some of the primary drivers there. But as you look out to 2024, could you give us an idea of how much of the contribution is coming from the manufacturing efficiencies versus some of the ASB gains? And then how should we think about cadence for gross margin 2024?
spk10: Thanks. Yeah, so those are the two largest drivers. I would say that those manufacturing efficiencies, I had been talking about them for two or three quarters of the time. And the ASPs, you've heard us talk about those. And it was a really healthy ASP year this year. And so I would say those two are battling for sort of number one position. Maybe they're a third each of the story or something like that in terms of in terms of the improvement. And it depends what your comparison period is and if you're a year over a year or sequential or whatever. But at high level, I would say, you know, general deal efficiencies and ASPs battling it out. There's some other lesser likes in there that that, you know, maybe I didn't put in the script that matter as well. I think like our quality costs are a big part of the story. And they had been sort of growing at a pace that was accelerated from really, really wanted to be. And so we started monitoring that and putting a little bit of a lid on that. And I think that's helped a lot as well. And so to the extent that we can keep those quality costs in check, that'll help the margin going forward as well. And
spk01: then restore flows had some really nice
spk10: operational results on the sort of processing side as of late. And so hopefully we can keep that going throughout the year.
spk24: Great, thanks. Then just one follow up related to M&A. You know, cash generation has been very healthy this year in 2022 and 2023. And then just with the announcement of the share repurchase, $50 million, how should we think about the pecking order for use of cash? You know, does that change how you look at M&A this year or do you feel that you would be able to achieve both and just kind of weighing your options? I mean, that would be great. Thank you.
spk08: Yeah. Hey, Danny, it's Dave Roberts. I would say I think the doubling of the authorization on the share repurchase is just good corporate oatmeal. I mean, obviously our cash balance is growing, as you mentioned, pretty healthily. So we thought increasing it from 25 to 50 is probably a good idea. But really at the end of the day, you know, we're feeding, we're taking cash and we're feeding the dividend. Obviously, you heard we just increased the dividend per Q1 from 14 to 16 cents. So that's, I think, our 13th annual increase in a row. So that's sort of a mainstay at LEMATE. And then excess cash beyond that is set aside for acquisitions. We've been hunting for a while. At some point we'll identify one and if it's larger, we'll use more of the cash beyond that. Is there other consumers of cash in terms of running the business like capital expenditures or when we buy out distributors, as we did a couple of years ago in Korea and last year in Thailand, those are uses as well.
spk16: Great.
spk15: Thank you
spk16: very much. Thanks, Danny.
spk15: Your next question comes from
spk14: the line of Rick Weiss, which T4, your line is now open.
spk04: Hey, this is John on for Rick. Just to start off, I wanted to get a little bit better understanding of guidance this year and maybe how price is contributing to the growth outlook in 2024 versus how it contributed in 2023.
spk10: Yeah, so in 2023, I mean, you've heard us talk about it quarterly. And I think George mentioned that for the full year 2023, it's about 11, 12% pricing answer. And I would say going forward in 2024, you know, maybe our default answer is sort of around five or six percent. Notably, that was kind of the default answer this past year in 2023. We instituted something a little bit new called pricing floors, and I think we got more traction out of those than we thought we might get. And so maybe we'll do a little bit more of that this year. We'll see where that goes. But I would say if you want to sort of base case answer, it's probably in that mid, mid high single digits range.
spk04: Thanks, that's helpful.
spk16: And just
spk04: looking ahead, just focusing on the gross margin line, you're guiding to 68% for 24. That's pretty strong growth. You're talking a lot about manufacturing increases, manufacturing efficiencies and price increases. This is I look further ahead. I mean, how should we be thinking about the gross margin structure for the business growing forward with higher with higher ASP's more efficient manufacturing? Could we be thinking about potentially returning to sort of the pre-COVID 70% gross margins you had? Thanks.
spk10: Yeah, I mean, obviously we're not we're not looking out that far with you guys right now on that score. I would say for right now, we were we're happy with that 68% sort of next step in the evolution here. We'll see where it goes from there. If you keep getting those, you know, I don't know, call it 10% price hike instead of 5% price hike, that does bleed through. And that is an incremental benefit that you will get. And if you can keep your direct labor folks efficient as they are now, or maybe a little bit more going forward, that obviously is going to help. But there's so much other stuff that goes on in gross margin land that that those aren't the only two answers, even if they're the biggest answers. You know, inventory is a topic for us whenever we do consolidations or transfers of manufacturing or other issues when excess and obsolete comes and gets you for a quarter or two. Those issues come and go. That quality topic, the expense quality expenses that I talked about, that's a topic. Transitions of manufacturing product lines like Omni-Flow and Cardiocell, which we've done recently, those can come in and out of it. We've built a couple of clean rooms in the last year or two, and those pieces come through in terms of depreciation and get us there and push the margin down a little bit. So I just I don't want to make it a clear line story for you. There's a lot going on in gross margin. We'll see what happens after this year.
spk06: But Jay, I'd like to leave John with a little bit of hope going forward. I think there are several shots on goal in that line item. We're just getting used to what it's like to be 68 again, but we need a lot of studying, etc. But I think there's some shots on goal,
spk16: John. Appreciate the color, guys. Thanks.
spk15: And your next question
spk14: comes from the line of Michael Patusky with Barrington Research. Your line is now open.
spk22: Thank you. Good evening, CJJ. You get the 300 basis point improvement. People are asking for more. They're never satisfied.
spk00: I
spk22: know that didn't last long, did it, Mike? It really didn't. What have we done for you? You had about an hour after the press release came out, I guess. All right. So I didn't catch this if you guys mentioned it. Did you guys mention what percentage of the Q4 sales growth was related to price and volume, how that split out for Q4 specifically?
spk06: We did not. It was 13 price, one unit. And for the year, again, to repeat, it was 12%
spk16: price, five units. And is
spk22: it possible, and I know you guys don't always do this, but you've occasionally done this, is it possible to get the artograph revenue for the quarter and for the year?
spk06: Yes, of course. Let's try to find it quickly
spk08: for you here. For the quarter, I have. I have, Mike. It's Dave. It's a little under $8 million, $7.9 million, up 10% for the quarter Q4. And the year? For the year? It's going to
spk06: be around $34 million, something like that. Yeah, something
spk08: like that.
spk06: We can get you that while we're on the call.
spk22: Okay. I have another question. So, you know, obviously it's been a while and the artograph deal has been successful, and I know Dave has been looking diligently. JJ, in terms of your comfort level with leverage, you know, obviously you guys said you could do a $225 million deal potentially. I mean, where do you think you sort of top out in terms of your comfort level with a leverage ratio on an external growth opportunity?
spk10: Yeah, so, you know, if you're maybe three, three and a half times EBITDA, maybe somewhere in that range before you talk about the EBITDA of the acquired company. And if EBITDA is sort of in the 45, 46-ish range these days, you know, maybe it's in that sort of 130, 140 million, 150, somewhere in there, Mike, I would say.
spk22: Okay, very good. And then just one more quick question. I mean, this pricing floor initiative, it does seem like it's really, really helped on an incremental basis. I'm just curious. I suspect maybe you went after some of the easiest low-hanging fruit on that, and maybe it's tougher going forward, or is that not the case in terms of pricing floors and what you can do
spk06: there? Okay, yeah, that's a good question. And at a high level, what the management team has been trying to do over the last three years is sort of take the pricing lever away from individual reps and bring it back in-house. Because, you know, as the previous questioner asked, the reps don't last forever here, and sometimes they cut a deal at a low price, and then we're left with it for X years. So we're kind of pulling it back, and this all started, Mike, about two years ago in the U.S. with one or two products, and now it's become a full-blown effort. And for the first time ever this year, there's a full set of pricing floors in Europe. We've had some pricing floors in Europe before, but for the first time ever, it's drilled into what we call the plank card, which is this little goal set that we pass out to every single employee. So we've got a European plank set that has pricing floors, and then also, again, for the first time ever, it's being drilled into the Japanese planks. And so in Japan specifically, not all of Asia, just Japan, which is half of our Asia right now, so we have it on the... So I think you've still got some room to go here. I think you'll start learning in nine weeks when we come back to you guys with Q1 as to, hey, what happened in Q1 relating to pricing? But it's become a full-blown effort, and it started with dribs and drabs two and a half years ago, and now it's real and it's worldwide.
spk10: Hey, Mike, on your... Sorry, did you have a follow-up on that? No,
spk21: no, go ahead.
spk10: Yeah, on your artographed question, we have a category, bovine graphs. I think it's nearly all the artographed answer. It was 30, probably 33 million in the year, and it was up 15% on a reported basis.
spk22: Actually, could I just confirm, George, you were talking fast when you were talking about some of the OUS development. Artographed Canada and Australia filings in 24, is that correct?
spk06: That is correct, and then also we've thrown in roughly five more Asia-packed countries we'll file over there as well.
spk22: And then, Xenashure is still 20, 25 in China.
spk06: Yeah, I mean, it just keeps pushing away, but yes, Xenashure Cardiac and Peripheral in China, 2025.
spk22: Okay, great. Well, listen, congratulations, and particularly congratulations to the team, and particularly JJ on that gross margin. I know you've been after that for a while, and congrats. Thanks.
spk09: It's a thankless job, Mike. That's
spk14: right. And your next question comes from the line of James Sidori, with Sidori and Cole. Your line is now open.
spk02: Hi, good afternoon, and thanks for taking the questions. Can you talk a little bit more about the Salesforce expansion? You said, I think you're going to add about 14 folks in 2024. Can you break that out internationally and domestically?
spk06: Sure. It feels, Jim, this is George, it feels largely like it's a domestic thing. We've got a bunch lined up to go in the US, less so in Canada, but call it a North American thing. And then a couple over in Asia pack, where we have some of these newer subsidiaries where, why would you start in Korea if you didn't give the guy three or four sales reps, right? It was not worth going over there unless you do that. So mostly North America, a little bit Asia, and not much in Europe, oddly, this year.
spk02: Okay. And you mentioned you opened offices in Korea and Thailand. What were you doing this year? Were those folks just working under their home? What changed?
spk06: Okay, so, and 2023 was our first year, a full year of operations in Korea. No, we were going through a distributor and we sold items to that distributor, and then she passed them along to Korean hospitals for, actually from before I started, Jim, 40 years later, she was still doing that. And we finally bought out her distributorship. We set up an office, hired a general manager, and then hired three sales reps for Korea. And now they're in our Seoul office, and they've been operating for one year, same drill in Thailand.
spk02: Okay, all right. And for 2024, you've guided for about 9% organic growth. Is it fair to say that a significant portion of that is from pricing?
spk06: You know, I would say we try not to guide on pricing because it's so variable what's happening. But if you look back to the 12 and 5 this past year in 2023, 12% price, 5% units, maybe that relationship holds until we all know differently.
spk02: Okay. And then the last one, can you, JJ, can you tell me what you're assuming the tax rate will be for 2024?
spk10: For Q1 or 24, let's see, what I put in there, Jim, 24.3, and then for the full year, 24.1.
spk03: Wow, can you be a little more specific?
spk10: You
spk09: asked.
spk02: Okay, 24 would have been good.
spk16: All right, thanks. Thanks,
spk14: Jim. Your next question comes from the line of Brooks O'Neill with Lake Street Capital Markets. Your line is now open.
spk05: Hey, good afternoon, guys. This is Aaron on the line for Brooks. Thanks, guys. So, you know, most of my questions have been addressed. But, so I guess for 2024, you know, we're sensing solid pricing and mainly solid volume and tight expense control remain key priorities for you guys. Can you just give us a little more color and an updated sense for the general environment in these areas?
spk06: Sure. And one of the folks on this call from KeyBank, they just published, Brett, we see him up on the screen. KeyBank just published a really nice report about credit card swipes in USA hospitals. And also we're studying staffing in USA hospitals. And I would say it feels good from all the stuff we read. You know, we're not revealing what's going on in the business for the first eight weeks of the year, but it feels good from all the stuff we read that this, quote, return to hospital of staff and patients seems to be stretching out into 2024. And we were happy to see it take place in 2023. And we I feel like it really helped the business in 2023. So maybe more of the same procedure wise.
spk05: Great. Yeah, that's helpful. And then last one for me. So you hired aggressively in sales and manufacturing last year, and this has been brought up, but you plan to add 14-ish reps. So if you could just outline some of the priorities for 2024 and how you're thinking about those. Thank you.
spk06: So priorities in terms of hiring, is that where we're going, Aaron? Correct. Yeah. Okay, great. So, and just to sort of get in there on the on the beginning of that question, the big hiring spurt took place at this business in 2022. We put on 141 new headcount. And then in 2023, we really slowed down a lot. We only put in 23 new headcount. So we really put on the brakes last year. We wanted to catch up to all that post-COVID hiring. We think we did that. And now we're back at it a little bit. And of the of the people we plan to hire this year, it feels like maybe we talked about 15 reps. You add five sales managers. There's 20 in the sales department, maybe. And maybe there's 20, 25 elsewhere. And maybe the biggest bucket of that is operations and manufacturing. There's something like 40-ish, 50-ish. We're still working that out. But we, you know, we're pretty tight-fisted. We're going to pay as you go. Plan here. Our number one goal here is off-income. And then stuff fills in after that. Great. Very
spk16: helpful. Thanks for that clarification. Congrats on the quarter. And you guys. Thanks a lot,
spk15: Aaron. Your last question comes
spk14: from the line of Brett Fishman with KeyBack. I'll mark it. Your line is now open.
spk17: Hi. This is actually Liz on for Brett. Thanks for taking the questions. Just to start off with the 9% growth for the year, how should we think about that amongst the different regions? And where do you expect to drive the most growth?
spk06: Well, that's a good question. I would say generically, we always think Asia-Pac is going to grow faster. Europe is going to grow second fastest. And North America is going to be a little bit slower. So that's generically. We don't really make guidance based on which region is going to happen. We'll be thrilled when we show up with that 9% organic growth, regardless of how it happens. 10% reported for the year is also what we guided. Does that get at some of your question, Liz?
spk17: Yeah, that was really helpful. And then if I could ask on the op leverage side, how are you thinking of balancing your R&D investments versus SG&A? And how should we think about this going forward?
spk06: Right. So sort of as you know, all balancing down to some kind of op margin numbers or something like that. I mean, R&D, we've been kind of building a little bit on a percent spent. I think we're up at 9% of sales on that. Maybe historically we were sort of in the eights and now we're in the nines. So maybe we've been cranking up a little bit on the R&D side. And specifically for us, R&D really means expanded regulatory and clinical efforts, not so much old fashioned R&D with new products. We tend to try to bring the products in through acquisitions. That may cover your R&D thing as a small part of your question, but the bigger part of the question is I think our guidance is implying 21% op margin for the year. Am I getting that right? Yeah, 21% op margin for the year. And I think in 23, that same figure was 19%. And the year before that, it was 17%. So I think we're seeing a little bit of operational leverage here. Of course, we're helped out in a big way by that gross margin number. If that sticks around, should make things pretty easy, not easy, but more doable around here. So a little bit of leverage coming from gross margin and still growing the sales force.
spk17: Okay, great. Thanks for taking the question.
spk16: Thanks a lot, Liz.
spk14: Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference. I would like to thank you for your participation and you may now disconnect.
spk15: Have a great day.
spk00: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
spk14: Thank you. Thank you. Welcome to the Lumet Vascular Q4 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. J.J. Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer of Lumet Vascular. Please go ahead.
spk10: Thank you, Operator. Good afternoon and thank you for joining us on our Q4 2023 Conference Call. With me on today's call is our CEO, George Lumet, and our President, Dave Roberts. Before we begin, I'll read our Safe Harbor Statement. Today, we will make some forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the accuracy of which is subject to risk and uncertainties. Wherever possible, we will try to identify those forward-looking statements by using words such as believe, expect, anticipate, pursue, forecast, and similar expressions. Our forward-looking statements are based on our estimates and assumptions as of today, February 27, 2024, and should not be relied upon as representing our estimates or views on any subsequent date. Please refer to the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information and the risk factors in our most recent 10-K and subsequent SEC filings, including disclosure of the factors that could cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied. During this call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which include organic sales growth, as well as operating income, operating expense, and EPS excluding special charges. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures discussed in this call is contained in the Associated Press Release and is available in the Investor Relations section of our website, .Lumet.com. I'll now turn the call over to George Lumet.
spk06: Thanks, JJ. Q4 was an excellent quarter with 19% sales growth, a .1% gross margin, and 46% up-income growth. I'll focus my remarks on the top line, Salesforce activities, and some regulatory updates. Geographically, EMEA was up 21% in Q4, the Americas 20%, and APAC 11%. By product, bovine patches were up 18%, allografts 52%, valvatomes 12%, and carotid shunt 16%. Distribution of the porcine patch also added $1.5 million of sales in the quarter. The return to hospital by staff and patients, ASP increases, ample product supply, and the growth of our Salesforce drove Q4 sales growth. We ended 2023 with 136 reps worldwide. By December 2024, we expect to employ approximately 150 reps. To accommodate rep growth in North America, we recently promoted three regional sales managers to become area sales managers. This additional management bandwidth should enable us to hire, train, and manage more RSMs and reps. The revenues from the 2020 artograph acquisition, coupled with recent sales growth, have made our North American territories too large. In 2023, our average North American territory had $2 million in sales. Over the years, we found smaller territories enabled tighter relationships with surgeons. So we've begun dividing some of the larger territories. This should reduce windshield time too. In Europe, we also remain in growth mode. We plan to open a Paris office in Q2, which should improve our connections with French surgeons and hostels, as well as our eight French sales reps. France is our sixth largest country by sales. Turning to Asia. I visited four of the six APAC offices in early February. Things look great over there. Our Tokyo branch is celebrating 20 years, and we've just opened offices in Seoul and Bangkok. In our first direct year in Korea, 2023 sales reached $1.7 million and our profits were $250,000. Both figures exceeded expectations. In Thailand, our first full year of direct sales should be about $1.6 million in 2024. Our Chinese team is also performing well and grew 40% last year. The artograph CE file was submitted in December 2023, and we also plan to file for artographed approval in Canada, Australia, and several other APAC countries this year. We also plan to make Zinusher filings for our peripheral and cardiac products by 2025 in China. And we're also making the MDR transition in Europe. As you know, Brussels has extended the MDR deadline to 2027. 22 of our product categories need this new MDR CE mark, so this is a considerable undertaking. We currently own three of these new MDR CE marks. Also in Europe, our allograph filings have been made in Ireland and Germany. And approval in either of those countries will be our first approval of allographs in the European Union. To conclude, 19% sales growth and a gross margin recovery produced 46% up-income growth in Q4. Our growing profitability and cash on hand provide safety and strategic optionality. With that, I'll turn it over to JJ.
spk10: Thanks, George. 2023 was an excellent year. We posted $193 million in sales, an increase of 20% on a reported basis and 17% organically. Our operating income increased 37% on a reported basis. If 2022 was our post-COVID rehiring year with 141 ads, then 2023 was the hiring constraint year with only 23 ads. This headcount control, along with our strong sales results and an improved gross margin, led to a 19% operating margin in 2023 versus 17% in 2022. Separately, our cash balance has improved by $22 million in 2023 to $105 million. Turning to the quarter, in Q4 2023, we posted a gross margin of 68.1%, up 450 basis points year over year. This increase was driven by higher ASPs, productivity improvements, and a weaker dollar. The benefits of a larger and more efficient manufacturing team have come onto the P&L. Our Allagraft manufacturing team had a strong Q4, and quality costs remain in check. In retrospect, our manufacturing hiring surge was well-timed with the global return to hospitals. Operating expenses in Q4 2023 were $23.1 million, an increase of 21% versus Q4 2022. The increase was driven largely by higher sales commissions, more sales professionals, and $700,000 of one-time reversals in Q4 2022. Q4 2023 operating income increased 46% year over year to $10.2 million, driven by higher sales and an improved gross margin. The operating margin in Q4 was 21%, up from 17% in the prior year period. Separately, we recently went live with a new ERP system in the United States. This system should improve real-time reporting, streamline financial processes, and provide more sophisticated analytics. Implementation at our overseas entities will take place in 2025 and 2026. We estimate that we will spend approximately $7 to $8 million on this project, and the annual P&L impact will be approximately $1 million per year. With respect to guidance, we are forecasting improved operating leverage in 2024, driven by restrained operating expense growth and an improved gross margin. Our guidance includes an operating margin in 2024 of 21% versus 19% in 2023 and 17% reported in 2022. For more details, please see our business outlook issued in today's press release, but a few Q1 highlights include reported sales growth of 10%, gross margin of 68.5%, operating income growth of 33%, and EPS growth of 42%. And for the full year 2024 guidance includes reported sales growth of 10%, gross margin of 68%, operating income growth of 22%, and EPS growth of 23%. With that, I'll turn it back over to the operator for
spk16: questions.
spk14: In order to ask questions, please press TAR11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press TAR11 again. Please stand by while we'll compile the Q&A roster.
spk15: Thank you. Your first question comes from
spk14: the line up, Siraj Kaila with Oppenheimer. Your line is now open.
spk13: Hi, George. JJ, can you hear me all right? Yes. Gentlemen, apologies for the background noise. So, George, let me start out, you know, in your prepared remarks, you talked about territories, or maybe it was JJ's comments,
spk11: but when you
spk13: split the territory, let's say from 2 million to, let's say, a million, can you walk us through the thought process in terms of sales rep commission, retention, you know, how does the process go about?
spk06: Okay, sure. And of course, Siraj, this is completely normal medical device activity, right? So this is exactly how sales forces grow. It's like an amoeba. The thing gets big, you've got to cut it in half, and it becomes too big for them to handle. So if a rep is running around Ohio trying to cover 2 million dollars worth of medical device sales, of course, some of the smaller hospitals start to feel ignored. And so very high level, you would clearly split it and put one guy and pick a city, Cleveland, and one guy in Columbus, and they would now split Ohio, if you will. So I think that's sort of the amoeba aspect of it. It's perfectly normal. And then what else would you like to know about what happens there? I was just curious in
spk13: terms of, I understand it's an over process in the industry. I was more specifically curious in terms of usually do encounter any sales force retention issues. Hence, by definition, any churn, concerns about churn.
spk06: Sure. No, I don't have particular concern. I do agree with you. Anytime you touch anything near the sales force, you sort of get near higher turnover. But this is perfectly normal and you have to do it or else you won't get good service to those surgeons in the hospital. So and on that score, Siraj, maybe just I know you didn't exactly ask this question, but we're into this thing. I read some article recently. It's called the big stay. I don't know if anyone's heard that. And so as opposed to the great resignation, we're now into the big stay and will mate experience. We've dramatically reduced turnover in last year. I think our number was like .5% down from somewhere. I'm going to get it wrong. Somewhere on 14 or 15% the year before. We're always three or four points better than our Massachusetts manufacturing colleague companies or peer companies. But major decrease in turnover and notably with the sales force. One thing to further mention Siraj specifically remember last year we had this massive surge in procedures and we grew organically 17%. Usually the mate before that had grown about 9% organically and as a result the W2s in the sales force. How much we paid the sales reps was dramatically higher in 2023 and as a result they stuck around to get those paychecks and you would have seen them start leaving January 15th, January 25th when they were getting their final commissions and bonuses. We haven't seen that at all. There's been one or two here and there but we have not seen that at all. So we're a very happy time in my opinion in the sales force. Great results, commission checks are huge, etc.
spk10: etc. Siraj, part of your question was how do the commissions change when you split the territories and as you recall we compensate the reps based on their performance versus a gross profit dollars quota. And so when the territory is split we obviously commensurately split the gross profit dollar quarters or change them based on whatever the new answer is and then their compensation, their tier that gets paid doesn't change but what it's linked to does change. So it's kind of quote unquote fair when you make the split. There isn't a big topic necessarily around that that they're obviously going to make half of what they were making before.
spk13: Fair enough. Gentlemen I'll quickly ask my two follow ups to avoid the background noise. So George, I'd love to get your updated thoughts on your M&A strategy looking forward. And the second question I have is I'd love to get your perspective. Valvilotomes grew 12% year over year. Obviously there was the best CLI study and that has really seen pull through for you guys in terms of growth. Are you all seeing any counterbalancing going on with the Basel II study, you know, which gave somewhat opposite results. Just curious if any, on to your thoughts on that front. Thank you for taking my questions again.
spk06: So I'm going to pass your M&A call over to Dave, question rather over to Dave and then I'll come back to the Valvatone question.
spk08: Hi, Siraj. Great to hear from you. And yeah, with respect to the acquisition strategy, I'd say the criteria are consistent from previous calls. Of course, we're focused on open vascular targets with more than five million of revenue. There are about 25 of them all together. Beyond that, we are and have been hunting in adjacent markets, maybe first cardiac surgery and endovascular. If anything, I think we learned from the artographed acquisition a few years ago that hunting larger is probably a good thing. It will move the needle more. So we've been looking at a little bit larger targets and also we have more cash, of course, to do an acquisition with the 105 million of cash and leaving 20 million on the balance sheet. Plus maybe three times our 46 million LTME, but we could fund 225 million of purchase price, excluding an equity raise or the target EBITDA leopard up. So I think it's we're just consistently looking out in the same hunting grounds where we have been. And hopefully someday we'll be able to report back that we've done a transaction.
spk06: And Sriraj, as your best CLI question. Yeah, in the first half of the year, I feel like we got excited about the best CLI study as it relates to valvulotomes. And then, of course, Basel comes out, the European study, Basel II comes out, and it's sort of the antidote to best CLI. Basically says do leg bypasses first open surgery and then Basel II comes and says, no, no, you can do stents and angioplasty. You're going to get great results that way too. So in some ways you do have surgeons that want to do open surgery saying I listen to best CLI and then you have surgeons and and and angiologists who want to use angioplasty and stents who come out and say I heard about Basel II. So there was a little bit of a retrenchment, I would say for the exact fact here. We grew valvulotomes 12 percent in dollars. That's 11 percent organic and units were up five percent last year. In fact, in general, across our portfolio, units were up five percent. So our first year with Basel II, I would say, you know, valvulotomes didn't go crazy good, although that five percent was better than the slightly decreased units of 21 and 22. So 2021 and 2022 decrease was around three or four percent in units. And then it bounced up again post Basel. I guess I'd say make of it what you will. It seems like it was a good thing, but then got counteracted by Basel II.
spk16: Thank you. Thanks a lot, Siraj. Those are great questions.
spk14: Again, that is Tar 11 to ask
spk15: a question. And one moment for your next question.
spk14: Your next question comes from the line of Danielle Stouter, which the GMT Security Line is now open.
spk23: Yeah, great. Can you guys hear me? Yes, Danny.
spk24: Great. So first off, I just wanted to ask on gross margins, you know, very healthy guidance. Great to see. And you talked about some of the primary drivers there. But as you look out to 2024, could you give us an idea of how much of the contribution is coming from the manufacturing efficiencies versus some of the ASB gains? And then how should we think about cadence for gross margin 2024?
spk10: Thanks. Yeah, so those are the two largest drivers. I would say that those manufacturing efficiencies, I had been talking about them for two or three quarters and the other time we come into the P&L. So that's good to see. And the ASPs, you've heard us talk about those. And it was a really healthy ASP year this year. And so I would say those two are battling for sort of number one position. Maybe they're a third each of the story or something like that in terms of the improvement. And it depends what your comparison period is and if you're a year over a year or sequential or whatever. But at high level, I would say, you know, general DL efficiencies and ASPs battling it out. There's some other lesser lights in there that maybe I didn't put in the script that matter as well. Like our quality costs are a big part of the story. And they had been sort of growing at a pace that was accelerated from really, really wanted to be. And so we started monitoring that and putting a little bit of a lid on that. And I think that's helped a lot as well. So to the extent that we can keep those quality costs in check, that'll help the margin going forward as well.
spk01: And
spk10: then restore flows had some really nice operational results on the sort of processing side as of late. And so hopefully we can keep that going throughout the year. So we'll see.
spk24: Great. Thanks. And then just one follow up really to M&A. Cash generation has been very healthy this year and in 2022 and 2023. You know, just with the announcement of the shared purchase, $50 million. You know, how should we think about the pecking order for use of cash? You know, does that change how you look at M&A this year or do you feel that you would be able to achieve both and just kind of weighing your options? I mean, that would be great. Thank you.
spk08: Yeah. Hey, Danny, it's Dave Roberts. I would say I think the doubling of the authorization on the share repurchase is just good corporate oatmeal. I mean, obviously our cash balance is growing, as you mentioned, pretty helpfully. So we thought increasing it from 25 to 50 is probably a good idea. But really, at the end of the day, you know, we're feeding we're taking cash and we're feeding the dividend. Obviously, you heard we just increased the dividend per Q1 from 14 to 16 cents. So that's I think our 13th annual increase in a row. So that's sort of a mainstay at LEMATE. And then excess cash beyond that is set aside for acquisitions. We've been hunting for a while. At some point, we'll identify one. And if it's larger, we'll use more of the cash beyond that. Is there other consumers of cash in terms of running the business like capital expenditures or when we buy out distributors, as we did a couple of years ago in Korea and last year in Thailand, those are uses as well.
spk16: Great. Thank you very much. Thanks, Danny.
spk15: Your next question comes from
spk14: the line of Rick Wise, which people your line is now open.
spk04: Hey, this is John on for Rick. Just to start off, I wanted to get a little bit better understanding of guidance this year and maybe how price is contributing to the growth outlook in 2024 versus how it contributed in 2023.
spk10: Yeah, so in 2023, I mean, you've heard us talk about it quarterly. And I think George mentioned that for the full year 2023, it's about 11, 12 percent pricing answer. And I would say going forward in 2024, you know, maybe our default answer is sort of around five or six percent. Notably, that was kind of the default answer this past year in 2023. We instituted something a little bit new called pricing floors, and I think we got more traction out of those than we thought we might get. And so maybe we'll do a little bit more of that this year. We'll see where that goes. But I would say if you want to sort of base case answer, it's probably in that mid mid high single digits range.
spk04: Thanks. That's helpful. And just looking ahead, just focusing on the gross margin line, you're guiding to 68 percent for 24. That's pretty strong growth. You're talking a lot about manufacturing increases, manufacturing efficiencies and price increases. This is I look further ahead. I mean, how should we be thinking about the gross margin structure for the business growing forward with higher with higher ASP's more efficient manufacturing? Could we be thinking about potentially returning to sort of the pre-COVID 70 percent gross margins you had? Thanks.
spk10: Yeah, I mean, obviously we're not we're not looking out that far with you guys right now on that score. I would say for right now, we were we're happy with that 68 percent sort of next step in the evolution here. We'll see where it goes from there. If you keep getting those, you know, I don't know, call it 10 percent price hike instead of five percent price hike, that does bleed through. And that is an incremental benefit that you will get. And if you can keep your direct labor folks efficient as they are now, or maybe a little bit more going forward, that obviously is going to help. But there's so much other stuff that goes on in gross margin land that that those aren't the only two answers, even if they're the biggest answers. You know, inventory is a topic for us whenever we do consolidations or transfers or manufacturing or other issues when excess and obsolete comes and gets you for a quarter or two. Those issues come and go. That quality topic, the expense quality expenses that I talked about, that's a topic. Transitions of manufacturing product lines like Omni flow and cardio cell, which we've done recently. Those can come in and out of it. We've built a couple of clean rooms in the last year or two, and those pieces come through in terms of depreciation and get us there and push the margin down a little bit. So I just I don't want to make it a clear line story for you. There's a lot going on in gross margin. We'll see what happens after this year. But,
spk06: Jay, I'd like to leave John with a little bit of hope going forward. I think there are several shots on goal in that line item. We're just getting used to what it's like to be 68 again. So we need a lot of studying, et cetera. But I think there's some shots on goal,
spk16: John. Appreciate the color, guys. Thanks.
spk15: And your next question comes
spk14: from the line of Michael Patusky with Baratun Research. Your line is now open.
spk22: Thank you. Good evening, CJJ. You get the 300 basis point improvement. People are asking for more. They're never satisfied. I know that didn't last long, did it, Mike? It really didn't. What have you done for me? You had about an hour after the press release came out, I guess. All right. So I didn't catch this if you guys mentioned it. Did you guys mention what percentage of the Q4 sales growth was related to price and volume, how that split out for Q4 specifically?
spk06: We did not. It was 13 price, one unit. And for the year, again, to repeat, it was 12
spk16: percent price, five units. And is
spk22: it possible, and I know you guys don't always do this, but you've occasionally done this, is it possible to get the artograph revenue for the quarter and for the year?
spk06: Yes, of course. Let's try to find it
spk08: quickly for you here. For the quarter, I have. I have, Mike. It's Dave. It's a little under $8 million, $7.9 million, up 10 percent for the quarter Q4. And the year? It's going to
spk06: be around $34 million, something like that. Yeah, something
spk08: like that.
spk06: We can get you that while we're on the call. OK,
spk22: I have another question. So, you know, obviously it's been a while and the artograph deal has been successful, and I know Dave has been looking diligently. JJ, in terms of your comfort level with leverage, you know, obviously you guys said you could do a $225 million deal potentially. I mean, where do you think you sort of top out in terms of your comfort level with a leverage ratio on an external growth opportunity?
spk10: Yeah, so, you know, if you're maybe three, three and a half times EBITDA, maybe somewhere in that range before you talk about the EBITDA of the acquired company. And if EBITDA is sort of in the 45, 46-ish range these days, you know, maybe it's in that sort of 130, 140 million, 150, somewhere in there, Mike, I would say.
spk22: OK, very good. And then just one more quick question. This pricing floor initiative, it does seem like it's really, really helped on an incremental basis. I'm just curious. I suspect maybe you went after some of the easiest low-hanging fruit on that, and maybe it's tougher going forward, or is that not the case in terms of pricing floors and what you can do
spk06: there? OK, yeah, that's a good question. And at a high level, what the management team has been trying to do over the last three years is sort of take the pricing lever away from individual reps and bring it back in-house. Because, you know, as the previous questioner asked, the reps don't last forever here, and sometimes they cut a deal at a low price, and then we're left with it for X years. So we're kind of pulling it back, and this all started, Mike, about two years ago in the U.S. with one or two products, and now it's become a full-blown effort. And for the first time ever this year, there's a full set of pricing floors in Europe. We've had some pricing floors in Europe before, but for the first time ever, it's drilled into what we call the plank card, which is this little goal set that we pass out to every single employee. So we've got a European plank set that has pricing floors, and then also, again, for the first time ever, it's being drilled into the Japanese planks. And so in Japan specifically, not all of Asia, just Japan, which is half of our Asia right now, so we have it on the... So I think you've still got some room to go here. I think you'll start learning in nine weeks when we come back to you guys with Q1 as to, hey, what happened in Q1 relating to pricing? But it's become a full-blown effort, and it started with dribs and drabs two and a half years ago, and now it's real and it's worldwide.
spk10: Hey, Mike, on your... Sorry, did you have a follow-up on that?
spk21: No, no, go ahead.
spk10: Yeah, on your artographed question, we have a category, bovine graphs. I think it's nearly all the artographed answer. It was 30, call it 33 million in the year, and it was up 15% on a reported basis.
spk22: Actually, could I just confirm, George, you were talking fast when you were talking about some of the OUS development. Artographed Canada and Australia filings in 24, is that correct?
spk06: That is correct. And then also we've thrown in roughly five more Asia-packed countries we'll file over there as well.
spk22: And then, Xenashure is still 2025 in China.
spk06: Yeah, I mean, it just keeps pushing away. But yes, Xenashure Cardiac and Peripheral in China 2025.
spk22: Okay, great. Well, listen, congratulations, and particularly congratulations to the team, and particularly JJ on that gross margin. I know you've been after that for a while, and congrats. Thanks.
spk09: It's a thankless job, Mike. That's
spk14: right. And your next question comes from the line of James Sidori, with Sidori and Cole. Your line is now open.
spk02: Hi, good afternoon, and thanks for taking the questions. Can you talk a little bit more about the Salesforce expansion? You said, I think you're going to add about 14 folks in 2024. Can you break that out internationally and domestically?
spk06: Sure. It feels, Jim, this is George, it feels largely like it's a domestic thing. We've got a bunch lined up to go in the US, less so in Canada, but call it a North American thing. And then a couple over in Asia pack, where we have some of these newer subsidiaries where, why would you start in Korea if you didn't give the guy three or four sales reps, right? It was not worth going over there unless you do that. So mostly North America, a little bit Asia, and not much in Europe, oddly, this year.
spk02: Okay. And you mentioned you opened offices in Korea and Thailand. What were you doing this year? Were those folks just working under their home? What changed?
spk06: Okay, so, and 2023 was our first year, a full year of operations in Korea. No, we were going through a distributor and we sold items to that distributor, and then she passed them along to Korean hospitals for, actually from before I started, Jim, 40 years later, she was still doing that. And we finally bought out her distributorship. We set up an office, hired a general manager, and then hired three sales reps for Korea. And now they're in our sole office, and they've been operating for one year, same drill in Thailand.
spk02: Okay, all right. And for 2024, you've guided for about 9% organic growth. Is it fair to say that a significant portion of that is from pricing?
spk06: You know, I would say we try not to guide on pricing because it's so variable what's happening. But if you look back to the 12 and 5 this past year in 2023, 12% price, 5% units, maybe that relationship holds until we all know differently.
spk02: Okay. And then the last one, can you, JJ, can you tell me what you're assuming the tax rate will be for 2024?
spk10: For Q1 or 24, let's see, what I put in there, Jim, 24.3, and then for the full year, 24.1.
spk03: Wow, can you be a little more specific?
spk09: You asked.
spk02: Okay, 24 would have been good.
spk09: All right, thanks.
spk16: Thanks, Jim.
spk14: Your next question comes from the line of Brooks O'Neill with Lake Street Capital Markets. Your line is now open.
spk05: Hey, good afternoon, guys. This is Aaron on the line for Brooks. So, you know, most of my questions have been addressed. But so I guess for 2024, you know, we're sensing solid pricing and mainly solid volume and tight expense control are main key priorities for you guys. Can you just give us a little more color and an updated sense for the general environment in these areas?
spk06: Sure. And one of the folks on this call from KeyBank, they just published, Brett, we see him up on the screen. KeyBank just published a really nice report about credit card swipes in USA hospitals. And also we're studying staffing in USA hospitals. And I would say it feels good from all the stuff we read. We're not revealing what's going on in the business for the first eight weeks of the year, but it feels good from all the stuff we read that this, quote, return to hospital of staff and patients seems to be stretching out into 2024. And we were happy to see it take place in 2023. And I feel like it really helped the business in 2023. So maybe more of the same procedure wise.
spk05: Great. Yeah, that's helpful. And then last one for me. So you hired aggressively in sales and manufacturing last year, and this has been brought up, but you plan to add 14 ish reps. So if you could just outline some of the priorities for 2024 and how you're thinking about those. Thank you.
spk06: So priorities in terms of hiring, is that we're going, Aaron? Correct. Yeah. Okay, great. So, and just to sort of get in there on the beginning of that question. The big hiring spurt took place at this business in 2022. We put on 141 new headcount. And then in 2023, we really slowed down a lot. We only put in 23 new headcount. So we really put on the brakes last year. We wanted to catch up to all that post-COVID hiring. We think we did that. And now we're back at it a little bit. And of the people we plan to hire this year, it feels like maybe we talked about 15 reps. You add five sales managers. There's 20 in the sales department. Maybe, and maybe there's 20, 25 elsewhere. And maybe the biggest bucket of that is operations and manufacturing. There's something like 40 ish, 50 ish. We're still working that out. But we're pretty tight-fisted. We're going to pay as you go, plan here. Our number one goal here is off-income. And then stuff fills in after that. Great.
spk16: Very helpful. Thanks for that clarification. And congrats on the quarter. And you guys. Thanks a lot,
spk15: Aaron. Your last question
spk14: comes from the line of Brett Fishman with KeyBack Abitall Markets. Your line is now open.
spk17: Hi, this is actually Liz on for Brett. Thanks for taking the questions. Just to start off with the 9% growth for the year, how should we think about that amongst the different regions? And where do you expect to drive the most growth?
spk06: Well, that's a good question. I would say generically, we always think Asia-Pac is going to grow faster. Europe is going to grow second fastest. And North America is going to be a little bit slower. So that's generically, we don't really make guidance based on which region is going to happen. We'll be thrilled when we show up with that 9% organic growth, regardless of how it happens. 10% reported for the year is also what we guided. Does that get at some of your question, Liz?
spk17: Yeah, that was really helpful. And then if I could ask on the op leverage side, how are you thinking of balancing your R&D investments versus SG&A? And how should we think about this going forward?
spk06: Right. So sort of as all balancing down to some kind of odd margin numbers or something like that. I mean, R&D, we've been kind of building a little bit on a percent spent. I think we're up at 9% of sales on that. Maybe historically, we were sort of in the eights and now we're in the nines. So maybe we've been cranking up a little bit on the R&D side. And specifically for us, R&D really means expanded regulatory and clinical efforts, not so much old fashioned R&D with new products. We tend to try to bring the products in through acquisitions. So that may cover your R&D thing as a small part of your question. But the bigger part of the question is I think our guidance is implying 21% op margin for the year. Am I getting that right? Yeah, 21% op margin for the year. And I think in 23, that same figure was 19%. And the year before that, it was 17%. So I think we're seeing a little bit of operational leverage here. Of course, we're helped out in a big way by that gross margin number. If that sticks around, should make things pretty easy, not easy, but more doable around here. So a little bit of leverage coming from gross margin and still growing the sales force.
spk17: Okay, great. Thanks for taking the question.
spk16: Thanks a lot, Liz.
spk14: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's conference. I would like to thank you for your participation and you may now disconnect. Have a great day.
Disclaimer