One Stop Systems, Inc.

trends are positioning OSS for continued sequential revenue growth throughout the remainder of 2024. This year, we've been focused on two important objectives to take advantage of favorable market dynamics and the healthy pipeline we have developed. First, we are focused on converting our pipeline to orders in our OSS segment, and second, we are pursuing customer-funded development opportunities that we believe will establish OSS as an incumbent on platforms driving future multi-year production contracts. Across our global defense and commercial markets, customers are looking for technology partners like OSS to support their expanding needs for rugged enterprise-class compute solutions. Driving these trends are the emerging requirements for AI, machine learning, autonomy, and sensor processing at the edge. The company's best-in-class hardware and software platforms bring the latest data center performance to harsh and challenging applications that we believe will allow OSS to take advantage of current and future demand trends. Our underlying performance during the second quarter and first half of the year is aligned with our plan. We continue to believe 2024 is creating strong foundation for sustainable year-over-year revenue growth and profitability in 2025, even as we navigate growing economic uncertainty and continued weakness in our European markets through 2024 with expected recovery in 2025. So with this introduction, let's take a look at the progress we've made during the second quarter in more detail, starting with our efforts to convert our pipeline to orders. Our unfactored pipeline at the end of the second quarter remained over a billion dollars. Approximately 70% of our current pipeline is comprised of platform opportunities, which we believe will help drive predictable multi-year revenue and backlog to OSS. I'm pleased with the growth and transformation of our pipeline, reflecting the positive contribution of our sales organization, the strategic investments we are making in product development, and the growing demand for our hardware and software platforms. As we continue pursuing opportunities to grow our pipeline, our operating plan in 2024 remains focused on increasing orders within our OSS segment. For the 2024 second quarter, we saw orders outpace revenue by over 20% for the second quarter in a row. Order growth over the past three months was driven by existing customers in the ground intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance market, known as the ISR market, and from customers in the commercial aerospace market. In addition, we had new customer awards in the air ISR market. We expect many of these new engagements will evolve into multi-year follow-on revenue opportunities in future periods. Second important objective we are pursuing this year is focused on growing our presence on customer-funded development programs. As we mentioned on our first quarter call, we started to disclose separate revenue and cost lines in our financial results associated with customer-funded development projects to show our potential and track new wins. We have defined program-related development work as customer-funded development on our financial statements. Through customer-funded development programs, we are typically providing a more integrated solution compared to the company's historic offerings. In addition, it establishes OSS as a platform incumbent on what is almost always a follow-on production and multiyear support contract. As a result, we expect our business model to benefit from a higher mix of annual recurring revenue and contracted multiyear backlogs in the future. Development relationships are expected to take one to two years before leading to production orders. So as business scales, we expect to benefit from steady quarter-over-quarter revenue growth while building a solid foundation of potential large-scale program opportunities. I'm pleased to report that customer-funded development revenue increased to $1.4 million in the 2024 second quarter, compared to $365,000 just three months ago. This growth was driven principally by the expansion of an existing relationship with a commercial aerospace customer for fielding of a new product and follow-on production. As expected, we are seeing increased interest from customers to support their development programs and we have multiple proposals currently submitted. As a result, we believe we will continue to experience sequential growth throughout the remainder of 2024 in customer-funded development revenue. We also have expanded our product development efforts this year and currently have five product efforts under development in the OSS segment focused on edge computing for both defense and commercial applications. We expect to announce and demonstrate these products in the second half of this year and the first half of 2025. Our second quarter results also reflect strategic investments we are making to support current and future growth. Over the past 12 months, we have added new program management personnel with experience managing large complex development and production programs for government and defense customers. We believe their experience will allow us to pursue even larger programs for development and production in defense and commercial markets. As I mentioned last quarter, we are developing a new growth-focused multi-year strategic plan. Our markets are rapidly evolving, which has required additional time to finalize our three-year strategic plan. We expect to communicate the growth strategies we are pursuing in a presentation later this year. As we look to the remainder of 2024, I'm excited by the long-term strategies we are pursuing to scale our business and drive profitable growth. Though it has taken some time, I'm encouraged by the growing progress underway as we establish ourselves in our markets. We continue to execute against our near-term transformation plan as we focus on driving orders, building backlog, growing revenue, and improving profitability. While the timing of orders will remain a factor as we get to scale, I'm confident we are building a strong foundation to achieve our long-term growth objectives. I want to thank our team for their continued hard work and dedication as we pursue compelling growth strategies aimed at building greater value for our shareholders. Looking forward, we anticipate consolidated revenue of approximately $13.3 million in the third quarter of 2024, which accounts for approximately $1.6 million of orders that we pushed to the fourth quarter. Our guidance for the third quarter of 2024 also includes expected OSS segment revenue of $6.3 million, representing 15% year-on-year growth in the OSS segment, partially offset by lower Bresna revenue due to continued softness in the company's European markets. While uncertain economic conditions and softness in Europe may negatively impact our consolidated second half performance, we believe our leading enterprise class compute solutions, strong balance sheet, and committed team are well positioned to take advantage of positive fundamentals across global markets and create long-term value for shareholders. With this overview, I'd like to turn the call over to our CFO, John Morrison, to review our 2024 second quarter financial results in more detail. John, please go ahead.

Thank you, Mike, and good afternoon, everyone. Our 2024 second quarter results reflect the ongoing transformation of our business model and continued improvements in orders. As a reminder, the company is comprised of two operating segments. Our OSS segment operates in the United States. It is primarily focused and involved in the design and manufacture of high-performance ruggedized edge processing, compute, storage, and connectivity systems. Our Brezner segment operates throughout Europe and is a system integrator with standard and custom all-in-one hardware systems and components. Regner also serves as a channel for OSS products to the European and Middle East markets. The following comments are based upon comparison of second quarter 2024 results to the second quarter 2023. For the second quarter, we reported consolidated revenue of $13.2 million, which exceeds our guidance of $13 million. The 23.3% year-over-year decline in consolidated revenue was primarily attributable to a $3.2 million reduction in revenue related to our former media customer and a $1.3 million decline in revenue associated with slower economic activity in Europe. Lower second quarter revenue was partially offset by new customer-funded development orders and revenue growth to new and existing customers. Looking at our OSS segment and backing out the 3.2 million impact from a former media customer, revenue at our OSS segment grew 8.3%, reflecting revenue growth from new and existing customers and the initial success at a new customer-funded development project. As Mike mentioned, in the first quarter of 2024, We started to separately disclose revenue and cost of sales line items associated with customer-funded development work in our financial statements. Customer-funded development typically represents non-recurring design and development work associated with the introduction of new products paid for by the customer. We expect customer-funded development to grow throughout 2024. Consolidated gross profit in the second quarter was 25.2% compared to 27.9% for the same period last year. The decline in our consolidated gross margin was primarily attributable to our underabsorption of our OSS segment production capacity and additional inventory reserves. Total second quarter operating expenses decreased 31.9% to $5.6 million, which was attributable to the elimination of prior costs associated with organizational restructuring and outside professional services. And these were partially offset by planned program management and investments made during the quarter. In addition, our financial results for the second quarter of 2023 were impacted by a $2.7 million charge related to the impairment of goodwill and a $1.3 million charge related to the employee retention, excuse me, $1.3 million benefit related to the employee retention tax credit. For the second quarter, the company reported a GAAP net loss of $2.3 million or $0.11 per share compared to a net loss of $2.4 million or $0.12 per share in the prior year. The company reported a non-GAAP net loss of $1.8 million, or $0.09 per share, compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $84,000, or $0.00 per share. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP metric, was a loss of $1.3 million compared to a positive adjusted EBITDA of $520,000 in the prior year's second quarter. Now, looking at the balance sheet in more detail. As of June 30, 2024, OSS had total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of $11.8 million and total working capital of $32.6 million. This is compared to total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of $11.8 million and total working capital of $35.6 million at December 31, 2023. OSS had no borrowings outstanding on its $2 million revolving line of credit on June 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively. The company's pressure operations had a consolidated balance outstanding on its term loans of June 30, 2024, of $1.1 million, down from $2.3 $1 million at December 31, 2023 and $3 million at June 30, 2023. For the six-month end of June 30, 2024, OSS generated $1.2 million in cash from operating activities compared to $2 million for the six-month end of June 30, 2023. This completes our financial review for the quarter. We would like to now open the call to questions. Open the call to questions.

Operator, John?

Yes, sir. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, please press star followed by the number one on your touchtone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up the handset before pressing any keys. Once again, star and ask a question.

Thank you for waiting.

We now have our first question. And this comes from the line of Tony Felling from Lake Street Capital. Please go ahead. Your line is now open.

Good afternoon, guys. Yeah, this is Tony Felling filling in for Eric Martinuzzi. Appreciate you taking the question. Yeah, so do we feel the company is properly staffed or a tighter focus on the defense customers?

Yeah, Tony, I do. And we've made some really, really good progress over the year to where we are. I think we're very well set to actually scale really well, too, with the people we have. So going back over the course of the year, just a quick summary. Of course, myself joined the team, run commercial and defense, but defense background of 30-plus years. And then we brought on a VP of sales and marketing, Robert Kaelball, He and I worked for a decade together in the defense market. He has over 35 years' experience selling and marketing into not only the U.S., but global defense. And then as I mentioned in the script, we wanted to augment the team with experienced program managers who are used to running large-scale defense programs that have development, production, sustainment, fielding, et cetera. So we added two program managers to the staff. each who, in their own right, have experience running $100 million-plus programs on the defense side. So, we're really well-situated there. In addition, as an AS9100-certified company and ISO 9001-certified, really well set in policy process quality, et cetera, to meet the standards required for defense and commercial. So I think we're in a really good place to execute against defense programs.

That's great. And, I mean, do you think there's any risk in terms of revenue concentration with more focus on the defense customers going forward, or, you know, is that kind of where we're headed?

Can you maybe repeat the front end of that, Tony?

just you know revenue risk cons you know with uh or risk in terms of revenue concentration with more focus on defense customers yeah i don't think so when i showed up the company we were primarily on uh with a larger value on the commercial side so as uh we've kind of increased up to about a 50 50 ratio right now as we're projecting and we're looking at our pipeline for the next three to five years we see that same ratio in our pipeline So I don't think we'll get a revenue concentration specifically that would become a risk. If anything, we've seen quite decent success here in the first year in broadening out that revenue across more defense customers in addition to the commercial customers that we've had. So I don't see a risk in the concentration in defense.

For sure. Great. I appreciate you taking the questions. I'll jump back.

Thank you. Thanks, Tony.

Thank you.

And we now have our next question, and this comes from the line of Brian Kingslinger from AGP. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks so much. Can you speak to the government procurement environment? Are you seeing reasonable sales cycles? Are they still elongated? And then as we enter the new fiscal year for the federal government, which always brings a set of budget delays. What can the company do to ensure a steady flow of orders, if at all?

Yeah, Brian, you know, the bane of existence, doing business with the U.S. government and defense, actually it's the same in most global MODs also. So the interesting thing we've seen is the, I would say the normal acquisition cycles from companies, from markets like I mentioned, the ISR market, their kind of technology roadmap timeframes have generally been consistent, so not really concerned there in terms of where the markets are going, their needs. The biggest factor really has been, and this has kind of been a trend over the last three to five years, is we're just seeing the procurement arms on the contract side taking exorbitantly longer time to award and contract out the contracts that have already been selected as winners or awarded at sole source. And when I say extensions, right, it used to be it might, when a winner was selected or they were getting to the end of a procurement, it might be three to four weeks for them to process You know, it's not uncommon now to see those sometimes take, you know, 12 to 14 weeks, which has really gotten, you know, a bigger impact now in the timing. So we worked through some timing issues a little bit. That's probably our biggest risk. In terms of their demand, the market needs, and the technology and the process they've gone through, those have still remained fairly consistent. And then as for next year, yes, you know, we always are concerned about CRs. The benefit you get on winning programs the year prior is the CRs usually affect new starts. So the more we win this year, the more stability we have in business into next year. But we do keep an eye on the CRs. We work with customers the best you can to plan for those. We did have two or three programs this year that were delayed. close to seven months past when we thought they would hit just because of the longer CR we had this year, and then the follow-on impact of them having to get the money appropriated. So timing issues definitely we have to deal with. Not much we can do rather than work closely with our customers, have things aligned and ready to go. We have seen some large primes have taken on considerations of funding smaller companies to protect schedules. for awards they know they're going to get but are waiting on award. And then the last thing we've been doing is we use some of our lobbying efforts just to help facilitate programs and timing and movement. Ultimately, if it's a CR, right, there's not much we can do. But we do work through our lobbying office to help resolve or supplant or put in place anything we can.

Great. And then When you talk about customer-funded development, I assume growth in these programs are leading indicators of larger awards. And if that's the case, how do you think about the average time of a customer-funded development program and how long might it take or typically take until it turns into something that I might call production or I'm not sure how to describe it?

Yeah, no, Brian, I think what you could – it's safe to say now for the kinds of programs that we're bidding – And we've started to win. We'll generally see the NRE or the development period be on the order of six to 12 or 18 months. So we're in that six to 18 month range, depending on the size and scope of the development and the system we're developing. Usually at the end of that 18 months, you have the first fieldings. Usually that's the LRIP, the low rate initial production. That's usually the first four or five or six prototypes It's usually delivered within the first kind of three to six months after that development period, and then you roll into a production period. That can usually run anywhere from one to two to three to five years, and then you usually have a technology refresh cycle that rolls up on the back end of that. So a perfect example is the Raytheon P8 program we have. There was initial front-end development. We've been on that program for the better part of, seven, eight years now, and we're on, I think, our second or third tech refresh. We're just finishing some development right now for the next technology refresh update for our system there. So that's the benefit of getting in on these front-end customer development programs. So a little bit of a long answer, but between six to 18 months, depending on the scope, is what I would say is average for us on those front-end developments.

Thank you. Last question I have is we start to think about the revenue expectations that we like to think about from the OSS segment. Is there any way you can quantify either the first six months or the trailing 12 months booked a bill?

Yeah, so we've been tracking it this year. So as I mentioned in the earnings call, right, the bookings have been outpacing revenue in that OSS segment by a little over 20%. Right. So that those would be like 1.2. I'm sorry.

1.2 maybe in this last. So maybe like 1.2 in this last quarter is that kind of initial.

Yeah. For the, for the trailing six months for this, for this year, we've been, you know, probably a little bit closer to 1.26. The last quarter here was a little bit stronger. We were, we were upwards of a little over 1.3. So we're starting to see some pickup on the booking side from a lot of work we initiated last year. And then we're forecasting to see that continued positive book-to-bill ratio greater than one through the next two quarters based on where we see things. The biggest impact will be timing on some, making sure the awards come in as planned. But based on where we're sitting, the majority of the pipeline that we have bid right now, we're waiting on awards, is either competitions we've won or sole source work. So we're feeling pretty confident in the scope and the value that we could potentially pull through. We're working the timing, as I mentioned, on processing it through the systems.

I'm going to squeeze one more in. Back to, we're headed to the end of the government fiscal year, some businesses in government obviously have a budget flush at the end of the year. Obviously, that also helps for the year after because you've had some budget this year and it protects against CR. Do your business have a budget flush in September generally, a benefit from that, or is that not typically the case?

So not much last year. So generally, on the government side, when they get to year-end and they're trying to use up a budget at the end of the year, they will generally go for buying additional production buys or spare buys. So generally, if you're incumbent on a platform, you'll see a better return on those year-end sweep-up funds. So we've started to position ourselves in some of those programs so we could start to take advantage of that. Because of some of the positioning work we did last year, the other way you can grab sweep up funds is usually if some labs or organizations are interested in some early technology fielding so they can work them in their lab or try them in exercises, we can sometimes see those pickups. So we've expanded our relationships across the defense so that we try to pursue opportunities where we can for people who might want to buy something for their lab or for some experiment in anticipation of a program in the following year. So as we get a bigger market share in defense, sweep up money will definitely be a lever that we can pull. We just need a little bit more penetration and incumbency across a few more platforms And then I think we'll start to see that really add more to our opportunities.

Great. Thanks for answering all my questions.

Thank you, Brian. Thanks, Brian.

Thank you. And there are no further questions at this time, sir. Please continue.

Okay, John. Thank you very much. We appreciate it.

Thank you. This concludes our conference for today.

Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.