PDS Biotechnology Corporation

Greetings, and welcome to PDS Biotechnology's second quarter 2021 financial results. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Deanne Randolph, Vice President of Commercial Development. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and welcome to PDS Biotechnology's second quarter 2021 earnings conference call and audio webcast. With me today are Dr. Frank Badu-Otto, Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Lauren B. Wood, Chief Medical Officer, and Dr. Seth Van Voorhees, Chief Financial Officer. Earlier this morning, PDS Biotech issued a press release announcing financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2021. We encourage everyone to read the press release as well as PDS Biotech's quarterly report on Form 10-Q, which was filed with the SEC earlier this morning. The company's press release is available on PDS Biotech's website at pdsbiotech.com, and the quarterly report will be posted later today. In addition, the conference calls and webcasts include the company's website and will be archived there for future reference. Before we begin, I would like to caution listeners that comments made by management during this conference call will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws, including the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve material risks and uncertainties, and the company's actual results may differ materially. For discussion of these risk factors, including among others, the risks related to COVID-19, The impact such pandemic may have on the company's business operations, financial operations, and results of operations, and the company's ability to respond to the related challenges, including those noted in this morning's press release, please refer to PDS Biotech's SEC filings. Investors, potential investors, and other listeners are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Please note that the content of this conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of the live broadcast, August 12, 2021. Except as required by law, the company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any statement to reflect events or circumstances that take place after the date of this call. Following today's prepared remarks, we will open the discussion for a question and answer session. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Dr. Frank Beruato. Frank?

Mr. Bedouin, your line is live. You may be muted.

Can you hear me? Yes, sir. I'm not muted. Can you hear me now?

Yes, sir, we can.

Can you hear? Okay. Okay. Let me start again then. Okay. Thank you, Deanne, and thanks to everyone on the call today. In the first half of 2021, PDS Biotech took a very significant step forward in our quest to develop transformative treatments for cancer. Over the past quarter, we obtained initial efficacy data in advanced refractory cancer patients whose cancer had continued to progress after treatment. In these advanced cancer patients, the observation of tumor shrinkage in about 70% of patients suggests that PDS-0101's ability to induce in vivo large quantities of the right phenotype of HPV16-specific killer T cells with strong killing potency may provide a powerful anti-tumor effect. This observation is in agreement with extensive preclinical studies, as well as our Phase I clinical study of PDS0101. We will continue to evaluate and confirm the anti-cancer efficacy of Versimune in our three ongoing Phase II trials of our lead candidate PDS0101 in HPV-related cancers. The demonstration of strong efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies of PDS0101 provides the scientific and clinical basis to aggressively pursue the next phase of growth for the company. We are preparing to advance our next two oncology pipeline products into human clinical testing, which both Lauren and I will discuss in more detail. Our recently completed financing provides us with the capital backing necessary to accomplish our plan of expanding our pipeline into clinical testing. These planned activities will enable us to continue to validate the Versamine platform as a highly promising approach to safe and effective cancer immunotherapy. We anticipate that the current data will also facilitate our path towards commercialization of our products and our plans to continue to grow shareholder value. The interim data for our National Cancer Institute-led Phase II study of PDS-0101 was reported on schedule as projected during the second quarter. Let's begin by reviewing this interim data, which was presented by the National Cancer Institute at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. PDS0101 is being developed to treat cancers caused by HPV type 16, including anal, cervical, head and neck, penile, vaginal, and vulva cancers. In the United States, Approximately 43,000 patients are diagnosed with HPV-related cancer annually. The vast majority of advanced HPV cancers, about 70 to 80% of these cases, are caused by HPV-16. For HPV cancer patients, the first line of therapy is usually radiation treatment with or followed by chemotherapy if necessary. It is reported that up to 30% or more of these patients will either fail treatment and progress to metastatic disease or have a recurrence of the cancer. These refractory patients who fail treatment with chemotherapy and radiation but who have not been treated with checkpoint inhibitors and are therefore checkpoint inhibitor naive constitute the first group of patients evaluated in the trials. It should be noted that checkpoint inhibitors have been FDA approved to treat these patients with refractory HPV cancer. About 12 to 24% of these patients, depending on the report, respond to checkpoint inhibitor therapy, meaning that 80% or more of these patients will not respond to checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This group of checkpoint inhibitor refractory patients constitutes the second group of patients being evaluated in the trial. These particular patients have very few options available to them and a historical median survival of only three to four months. PDS0101 is specifically designed to treat HPV16, which, as I mentioned, is the most difficult to treat type of HPV cancer. Based on the patient population and their stage of illness, with potentially weakly functional immune systems and very short survival times, we have set an extremely high bar for PDS0101. We believe that this is important to clearly understand and to demonstrate the potential of the Versamine platform to significantly advance the treatment of cancer. In this trial, PDS-0101 is being evaluated in a triple combination, including two other clinical stage immunotherapies. Bintrac Staph Alpha, a bifunctional checkpoint inhibitor, TGF beta-trap fusion protein, and M9241, an immunocytokine. PDS-0101 is designed to activate the immune system to produce in vivo large quantities of powerful CD8 positive killer T cells to target and kill tumors that are HPV16 positive. This novel combination is being studied in patients with all types of advanced HPV-associated cancers whose cancer has returned or spread after treatment. At the time of interim data reporting, it was found that of the initial six HPV-16 positive patients who had not been treated with checkpoint inhibitors, the checkpoint inhibitor naive patients, 5 out of 6, or 83%, demonstrated an objective response with a tumor reduction of 30% or more. The reported objective response rate in this population with current standard-of-care checkpoint inhibitor treatment ranges from 12% to 24%. Of the patients treated with the PDS-0101-based triple combination, 100% were still alive at eight months. The historical median survival or lifespan for this patient population is seven to 11 months. Now, of the 12 HPV16-positive checkpoint inhibitor refractory patients who had also failed treatment with checkpoint inhibitors, In addition to chemotherapy and radiation treatment, tumor reduction was observed in 7 out of 12, or 58%, with an overall objective response rate of 42% already achieved at the time of reporting. The objective response rate with the current standard of care ranges from 5 to 12%. 83% of patients treated with the PDS-0101-based combination were still alive at the median of eight months. In contrast, the historical median survival or lifespan for this patient population is only three to four months. It is important to understand that PDS0101 is designed to train the body to generate killer T cells that specifically target HPV16. This means that for the 20% or so whose cancers are caused by a different type of HPV, the HPV16 specific T cells generated by PDS0101 may not recognize their cancers. It was interesting to note in the ASCO presentation that seven patients were recruited whose cancer was HPV16 negative. meaning that their cancer was caused by a different type of HPV other than HPV-16. These seven patients received the triple combination, and it was reported that none of these patients experienced tumor reduction compared to almost 70% of HPV-16 positive patients who experienced tumor reduction. These results highlight the potential role of PD recruiting, training, and arming large numbers of cancer-attacking HPV16 killer T cells in these very ill patients. These killer T cells are critical to generating an effective anti-cancer therapy. As I mentioned at the beginning, we have set a really high bar for PDS0101 as our first proof-of-concept study. These objective response rates are unprecedented in immuno-oncology, strengthening the evidence of the Versamine platform's potential ability to induce high levels of tumor-specific CD8 plus killer T cells that may attack the cancer and overcome a key limitation of cancer immunotherapy. The data suggests that the Versamine-based immunotherapies may have the potential to set the standard may have the potential to set the standard by which other oncology products and immuno-oncology products will be compared. Moving on now to the PDS-Biotech-initiated Versatile 002 trial. The Versatile 002 study is designed to evaluate PDS-0101 in combination with Keytruda, also known as Pembrolizumab, in the treatment of advanced HPV16-associated head and neck cancer. The trial is currently being run at approximately 16 clinical sites in the United States with an eventual target of 26 sites. Keytruda is FDA-approved for the treatment of head and neck cancer, including HPV-associated head and neck cancer. It is reported that about 70% of cancers of the oropharynx may be linked to HPV, and about 90% of these are HPV16 positive. This highlights the need for effective therapies to address advanced HPV-associated head and neck cancer. Given the impressive interim results seen in the National Cancer Institute-led study and the strong suggestions of effective HPV-specific T cell induction, even in patients who had failed checkpoint inhibitor therapy, we have expanded the versatile 002 trial to also include checkpoint inhibitor refractory patients. As previously reported, the other arm is evaluating the combination as first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer in checkpoint-naive patients. We believe there is a significant unmet medical need in advanced refractory head and neck cancer, The combination of PDS-0101 and Keytruda has the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes for these patients who have limited treatment options. We still anticipate that preliminary data will be available on schedule, as we have been projecting, late in the fourth quarter of 2021 or during the first quarter of 2022. Moving on to the third trial, the ImmunoServe trial. The MD Anderson-led immunotherapy trial is a Phase II study evaluating PDS-0101 in combination with standard of care chemoradiotherapy, or CRT, for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. The study is investigating the safety and preliminary efficacy outcomes of this combination. The single-site study is actively recruiting and enrolling patients. Based on the reported impact of COVID-19 on clinical operations at MD Anderson, we believe that it is extremely unlikely for preliminary clinical data to become available during the fourth quarter of 2021. Our most recent projections, due to the uncertainty regarding recruitment rates at MD Anderson, were for the fourth quarter of 2021 through the first half of 2022. We now believe preliminary results will most likely be available for ImmunoServe during the first half of 2022. As we reviewed during our recent Research and Development Day, The interim data from these PDS-0101 studies provides early clinical proof-of-concept data that allows us to confidently advance our next two oncology pipeline products into human clinical trials. PDS-0102 combines diverse mean platform technology with the proprietary T-cell receptor gamma alternate reading frame protein, TARP, also known as TARP, a tumor antigen identified by the National Cancer Institute. This tumor-specific protein is strongly associated with acute myeloid leukemia, AML, prostate, and breast cancers. Approximately half a million patients are projected to be diagnosed with AML, prostate, or breast cancer this year in the United States alone. Most of these cancers will be associated with TARP. It is important to note that TARP is a clinically validated target. Studies performed and published by the National Cancer Institute in prostate cancer patients showed strong immunogenicity and significant slowing of the cancer growth rate. In PDS-01-02 preclinical studies conducted by PDS Biotech, we have demonstrated the ability of Versamune to significantly enhance the in vivo induction of powerful TARP-specific CD8 killer T cells. The majority of the formulation and preclinical work for PDS-O102 has been completed, and our goal is to initiate a Phase I-II clinical trial in the first half of 2022. We announced last quarter that Dr. Mark Froelich, a world-renowned expert in prostate cancer and immunotherapy, has joined the PDS Biotech Scientific Advisory Board. It is also important to note that PDS Biotech already has the world's foremost expert in TARP immunotherapy, Dr. Lauren V. Wood, leading our clinical programs. PDS 0103 combines diverse new platform technology with novel, highly immunogenic agonist epitopes of Mach 1, MOC1 is highly expressed in multiple tumor types and has been shown to be associated with drug resistance and poor disease prognosis. PDS Biotech is developing PDS0103 for the treatment of breast, colorectal, lung, and ovarian cancers. In the United States alone, approximately 690,000 patients are diagnosed with these types of cancer annually. Preclinical work for PDS-0103 is ongoing both at PDS Biotech and at the National Cancer Institute. We expect that the results of those studies will be available by the end of this year and will inform the Phase 1-2 clinical trial design. As with PDS-0102, our goal with PDS-0103 is to initiate a clinical trial in 2022. Last quarter, PDS Biotech announced the addition of Dr. Olivera Finn, a world-renowned immunotherapy expert and the discoverer of the Mach 1 protein to the PDS Biotech Scientific Advisory Board. At PDS Biotech, our primary focus continues to be oncology. However, Based on the previously described potential to develop a new class of T-cell-inducing vaccines using our Versamune platform, our partners are making progress with our infectious disease candidates as well. PDS02-02 is being developed as a universal flu vaccine capable of providing protection against multiple strains of the flu virus. PDS0202 combines diverse immune platform with novel influenza proteins. Preclinical work for PDS0202 was initiated a few months ago in collaboration with our partner, Professor Gerald Woodward at the University of Kentucky School of Medicine. The work has been progressing steadily in collaboration with researchers at the NIAID Civics Program, according to the projected schedule. The initial results have been highly encouraging, and we still anticipate that preclinical work will be completed during the fourth quarter. PDS02-03 was designed with the goal to potentially provide long-term and broad protection against infection from COVID-19. Pharmacol Biotechnology has licensed Versamune in Latin America to develop PDS02-03 in Brazil. PDS-0203 consists of two components, Versamil, which is being produced by PDS Biotech, and the SARS-CoV-2 antigen, which is being developed and manufactured by Pharmacol. In addition to manufacturing the antigen, Pharmacol leads all regulatory and clinical trial efforts in Brazil. As of today, Pharmacor has not yet completed manufacturing of the antigen in order to submit the full chemistry manufacturing and controls or CMC portion of the investigational medicinal product dossier IMPD to Anvisa. This is required to complete Anvisa's review of the program. As a result, this program has not progressed as expected by PDS Biotech, and we will be completing a full program review to determine next steps. Moving on to financials. This June, we completed a $52 million public offering. Seth Van Voorhis, PDS Biotech CFO, will provide further detail on the financing. PDS Biotech has built significant momentum over the past three months, as evidenced in our recent addition to the Russell Microcap Index as part of the 2021 annual reconstitution. We plan to build on that momentum to execute efficiently to develop a new generation of cancer immunotherapies and to continue to grow shareholder value. Now I'd like to pass the call to Dr. Lauren Wood, PDS Biotechnology's Chief Medical Officer, who will provide more comprehensive clinical updates on our immuno-oncology programs. Lauren?

Thank you, Frank, and thanks to all of you for joining us this morning. As Frank just detailed, we have made incredible progress with our oncology pipeline since our first quarter call. I'll begin with our ongoing oncology clinical trials. Starting with our lead candidate, PDS0101, which targets HPV16-related cancers, there are three ongoing Phase II clinical trials. The most progressed is a study being performed at the National Cancer Institute in advanced HPV-associated cancers. Interim data for this study was presented in June at the 2021 ASCO meeting. As Frank mentioned, these PDS-0101 data represent the first proof-of-concept human clinical data in advanced cancer for our reverse immune technology platform. I'll begin with an overview of the clinical trial design for this investigator-initiated study. of PDS0101 in combination with ventrofuscalpha, also known as M7824, a first-in-class bifunctional checkpoint inhibitor, and M9241, an antibody-conjugated cytokine designed to facilitate entry of the cytokine IL-12 into tumors. Moving forward, I'll refer to ventrofuscalpha as ventra. The study is designed to evaluate the treatment combination in both checkpoint inhibitor-naive and refractory patients with advanced HPV-associated cancers that have progressed or returned after treatment. Most HPV-associated cancers, those associated with greater than 95% of all U.S. cases, are represented in this NCI data set. From epidemiology reports, we know that 70% to 80% of these cancers are caused by HPV-16 infection, as Frank noted, the most oncogenic high-risk HPV type. These cancers include anal, cervical, head and neck, vulvar, and vaginal cancer. The composition of tumor types included in the trial to date is similar to that seen in the overall population, with the majority of patients having head and neck, or cervical cancer, followed by anal, vaginal, and vulvar cancers. In the trial, objective response rate, known as ORR, is measured by radiographic tumor responses according to Resist 1.1. The study will ultimately evaluate the objective response rate in 56 patients. Today, we'll review an interim look at the data presented that includes a total of 25 patients. approximately half of the patients to be accrued to the study. The study enrolled a challenging and difficult patient population to treat. Of the 25 patients evaluated in this data set, 96% had failed both chemotherapy and radiation treatment, and 56% had also failed checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Patients often come to the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, when they have exhausted all other standard of care treatment options. And we can see that reflected in these demographic data. Importantly, of the 25 patients, 18 were HPV16 positive and 7 were HPV16 negative. Of the 18 HPV16 positive patients, 6 were checkpoint inhibitor naive and 12 were checkpoint inhibitor refractory. The median study follow-up represented was about eight months. Let's begin with the six HPV16 positive checkpoint inhibitor 98 patients. Again, objective response is defined by resist 1.1 as a reduction in tumor burden of at least 30% or more. In these patients who had not previously received checkpoint inhibitors, the triple combination achieved an 83% objective response rate. This is an outstanding result thus far and exceeds expectations as this patient population is very difficult to treat because they are so heavily pretreated. The objective response rates with standard of care checkpoint inhibitors reports date advanced HPV cancer patients who have failed prior therapy is generally around 12 to 24%. Of the five objective responses in this population, one patient had already achieved a complete response. Importantly, this triple combination also shows promising durability in these HPV-16 positive checkpoint inhibitor patients, as 80% of these patients have an ongoing response at a median of eight months of follow-up, and all six patients are alive. One patient came off the combination, halting the response. For context, this patient population has a historical mean survival of 7 to 11 months. with standard of care checkpoint inhibitor therapy. These preliminary interim results suggest that PDS or 101 induction of in vivo, highly active, tumor-attacking HPV16 killer CD8 T cells documented in the published preclinical animal studies may also result in effective tumor shrinkage in humans. Moving now to the 12 HPV16 positive patients treated in the checkpoint inhibitor refractory arm. These are patients who have failed treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, as well as checkpoint inhibitors. In this population, the triple combination achieved tumor reduction in 58% of patients. These 12 patients included the initial eight patients reported in the abstract, where five of eight, or 63%, had tumor reductions. Of the four additional patients in this updated data set, two patients already had ongoing tumor reduction at the time of reporting but had not yet met the 30% or greater threshold criteria for objective response. As might be expected with standard of care, the objective response rates reported in checkpoint refractory advanced HPV cancer patients are even lower than those naive to checkpoint inhibitors. generally only 5% to 12%. Encouragingly, similar to the checkpoint inhibitor naive patients, the triple combination also showed potential promising durability in these HPV16 positive checkpoint refractory patients. 58% of patients have ongoing tumor reduction, and importantly, 80% of patients who had achieved an objective response had ongoing responses at a median of eight months. At 10 of 12, 83% of these patients are alive at a median of eight months is also notable, as again, this checkpoint refractory patient population generally has a historical median survival of less than half that, only three to four months. These preliminary results suggest PDS0101 induction in vivo of highly active tumor-attacking HPV16 killer CD8 T cells, even in extensively treated and likely immunologically limited patients, presents strong potential for effective disease reduction and unprecedented durable responses. As with any other combination regimen, a common question that arises is the relative contribution of individual components in the triple combination. to the encouraging results seen so far. Specifically, the top question posed to Dr. Strauss following his ASCO presentation was, do you believe all three therapies are contributing to the clinical benefits? The data on HPV16 negative patients helps elucidate the role of PDS-L101 in the triple combination. You'll recall that this trial is being conducted in patients with advanced HPV-related cancers, agnostic on the strain of HPV, required to qualify for enrollment. It's important to understand that PDS0101 is actually a molecularly targeted immunotherapeutic that leverages the specificity of the immune system to definitively and exclusively attack tumors expressing only the target tumor antigens, which in this case includes HPV16, E6, and E7. Among the checkpoint inhibitor naive and refractory patients in this study, 67% of HPV16 positive patients experienced tumor reduction at a median of eight months. In contrast, in the seven HPV16 negative patients, those with an HPV type other than HPV16 that do not express the molecular target of PDS0101, zero. of seven patients experienced tumor reduction. These observations suggest that HPV16-specific CD8 and even CD4 T-cell induction by PDS0101, as predicted by preclinical studies, may promote tumor reduction and enhance clinical benefit of the triple combination. Results in these seven HPV16-negative patients also suggest a potential critical role of PDSO101-induced CD8 T cells in promoting survival in the triple combination treatment. In these heavily treated advanced cancer patients, remarkably, the majority of patients are still alive at a median of eight months of follow-up. 89% of the HPV16 positive patients are alive, and 57% of the HPV16 negative patients are also alive. These preliminary data are particularly encouraging as they document impressive survival responses regardless of prior checkpoint inhibitor exposure. Furthermore, these clinical responses were seen equally in all types of HPV16 positive cancers in patients with cervical, head and neck, anal, vaginal, as well as vulvar cancers. This is very important because what it suggests is that it may not matter where in the body the tumor is so long as it expresses the tumor antigen that is combined with First Immune and which First Immune trains the T cells of the immune system to specifically recognize. This also has strong implications for effective treatment as well as elimination of metastatic disease. Turning now to the safety data associated with the trials. A very important consideration for combination oncology treatment regimens is to avoid additional or excess toxicity associated with limited anti-tumor activity. Importantly, PDS-0101 does not appear to compound toxicities of the triple combination therapy. The adverse events documented to date with the triple combination are consistent with those previously observed with Vintra and M9241 monotherapy treatments. Specifically, grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in approximately 40% of patients. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events, also known as TRAEs, were anemia due to gross hematuria, decreased lymphocytes, and the presence of flu-like symptoms. As would be expected with both PDS-0101 and M9241, being delivered subcutaneously, injection site reactions were seen in 20% of patients. Four patients who originally had grade 3 toxicities with a triple combination, including M9241 dosed at 16.8 micrograms per kilogram, tolerated the combination when the dose of M9241 was lowered by 50% to 8 micrograms per kilogram without any further grade greater than or equal to grade three toxicities. Again, as we seek to understand the contribution of each of the individual components to the safety as well as the efficacy profile of the triple combination, it's important to note that no new or worsening toxicities were observed from the addition of PDS-0101 to the combination. We look forward to the data from the continued evaluation of these patients, as well as the addition of more patients to the data set to answer these very important questions regarding safety as well as clinical outcomes. Now on to the PDS-sponsored Versatile 002 study. As Frank discussed during his remarks, activation of sites and enrollment in Versatile 002 continues to progress and we currently have 16 sites open to enrollment. The Versatile 002 trial was also recently expanded to include checkpoint inhibitor refractory patients as a result of the impressive preliminary results observed in this population in the NCI-led triple combination study I just talked about. As part of the revised Simon two-stage design, objective responses after six months of treatment will be assessed in both the checkpoint naive and refractory patient arms. There is a leading cohort of 12 patients to assess the safety of the combination, and the total number of patients is essentially unchanged at 95 with the revised design. We estimate safety data on the initial 12 subjects to be available in the coming months and anticipate preliminary efficacy data late in Q4 of 2021 or Q1 of 2022. The study lead principal investigator is Dr. Jared Weiss, who serves as the section chief of thoracic and head and neck oncology at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Care Center. We are thrilled to have Dr. Weiss involved in this important study. As with the NCI-led trial, There is an enormous unmet medical need in advanced head and neck cancer patients who have failed multiple therapies, including chemotherapy, radiation, and checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We believe the combination of PDS-0101 and Keytruda has the potential to similarly significantly improve clinical outcomes for these patients who have limited treatment options. Moving now to the MD Anderson-led Phase II clinical trial of PDS-0101 in combination with standard of care chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. This study is also known as ImmunoServe. It will enroll approximately 35 patients and investigate the effect of the combination on safety and preliminary oncologic outcomes. Importantly, The study is also exploring immune priming by PDS0101 by studying various biomarkers of immune response in both blood and tumor tissue. We believe that PDS0101's demonstrated ability to activate the immune system and induce tumor-targeting killer T cells may provide improved outcomes to patients with cervical cancer. The first readout of clinical data from this study is anticipated during the second half of 2021. The study is being conducted by Dr. Anne Klopp, MD-PhD, Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. As Frank mentioned, this is a single-site study, and it has been heavily impacted by the ongoing COVID pandemic. We will continue to work closely with the excellent team at MD Anderson to monitor ongoing recruitment. As Frank noted, work is also ongoing for our infectious disease programs. For our universal flu program, PDS-0202, preclinical work has been progressing steadily, and I hope to have a more detailed update on those preclinical studies by the time of our next earnings call. For PDS-0203, the Plan Phase 1-2 clinical study cannot be initiated until ADVISA, provides approval to our partner in Brazil, PharmaCorp. We will be conducting a full program review with PharmaCorp to determine the appropriate path forward. I would now like to turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Seth Van Gorghis, to review our second quarter 2021 financials. Seth?

Thank you, Lauren, and good morning, everyone. Let's now turn our discussion to a review of our financial results. For the three- and six-month period ending June 30th, 2021, our loss from operations was approximately $5.1 and $8.2 million, respectively, versus a loss of approximately $2.9 and $7 million, respectively, during the same periods in 2020. During the second quarter of 2021, our operating loss was positively impacted by approximately $4.5 million from the sale of our New Jersey tax benefit pursuant to the New Jersey Technology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Net Operating Loss Program. Our net loss for the three and six months period ending June 30th, 2021, excuse me, June 30th, 2021, was approximately $0.6 and $3.6 million, respectively, or negative 3 cents and 16 cents per basic and diluted share versus our net loss for the three and six month period ending June 30th, 2020 of approximately 2.9 million and $7 million respectively, or negative 19 cents and 54 cents per basic and diluted share. For the three and six month period ending June 30th, 2021, research and development expenses totally approximately $2.8 million and $4.2 million, respectively, as compared to $1.4 and $3.4 million, respectively, for the same period in 2020. These results reflect an increase of approximately $1.3 and $0.8 million, respectively, for the three- and six-month period ending June 30, 2021, versus the same period in 2020. were reflecting higher levels of clinical-related activity. For the three- and six-month period ending in June 30, 2021, general and administrative expenses were approximately $2.3 and $4.0 million, respectively, as compared to approximately $1.5 and $3.6 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2020. These results reflect an increase of approximately 0.8 and $0.4 million, respectively, for the three- and six-month period ending June 30, 2021, versus the same period in 2020, reflecting higher levels of personnel costs. Looking at cash flow, we started the second quarter of 2021 with approximately $25 million of cash. We ended the second quarter of 2021 with $75 million, reflecting an increase of approximately $50 million. This increase in cash assets was a consequence of cash added from the sale of the New Jersey NOLs in May and the secondary offering completed in June, less cash used in our operations during the second quarter of 2021. An important highlight of the second quarter was the capital raised in our secondary offering. In June, we completed a public offering of approximately 6.1 million shares of common stock and raised gross proceeds of approximately $51.7 million before deducting underwriting discounts, commission, and other expenses. Cantor Fitzgerald and Company acted as the sole book running manager for this offering. This oversubscribed offering enabled PDS Biotech to successfully achieve one of its strategic goals to increase its institutional ownership by attracting investments from new and existing institutional investors. Many of the institutional investors that participated in this offering have strong track records with their investments with other biotechnology companies. PDS Biotechnology intends to use the proceeds from this offering to advance its ongoing Phase II HPV cancer-focused PDS0101 clinical programs, advance the development of its non-HPV cancer-focused PDS0102 and PDS0103 programs, based on TARP and MUC1 antigens, respectively, including the initiations of clinical Phase I and II programs, and for the continued development of its First Immune Technology platform. The appreciation of our share price since the beginning of this year has coincided with a significant increase in the average daily trading volume of our shares, which has greatly increased liquidity for our existing and future investors. In addition, our recent inclusion in the Russell Microcraft Index may build on this momentum to further increase liquidity and to continue to grow shareholder value. Thank you for your time today, and I'd like to now turn the call back to Frank for final remarks.

Thank you, Seth and Lauren. I would also like to thank our extremely valuable team members here at PDS Biotech and all of our clinical partners for their continued excellent work. Without the expertise of our teams and the successful collaborative efforts, this quarter's milestones would not have been possible. The second quarter has been extremely important for PDS-Biotech. The previously unseen level of objective responses in advanced refractory cancer reported by the National Cancer Institute in the PDS-0101 trial provides the first proof of concept data in advanced refractory cancer for our Versamune technology platform. Our capital raise of approximately $52 million further strengthens our balance sheet and provides PDS Biotech with the funding necessary to aggressively advance our immune oncology pipeline. The company is well positioned, and we plan to build on the current momentum to move quickly to the next phase of growth by continuing to successfully execute our three ongoing phase two clinical trials for PDS0101 and to progress PDS0102 and PDS0103 into human testing. We are also looking forward to continuing to build an awareness of PDS biotech within the investment community. That concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, please begin our question and answer session.

Thank you. At this time, we'll be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Our first question today is from Louise Chen of Cantor Fitzgerald. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, congratulations on all the progress in the quarter. Thanks for taking my questions here. So my first question is, why or how does the data that you've seen so far for 101 give you confidence in a positive outcome for your Keytruda combo trial? Secondly, for PDS 0103, just curious where you think you would fit in the treatment paradigm if approved, because some of the indications you're going off after are crowded like non-small cell lung cancer. And then third question is for PDS 0102, your TARP, you stated in your presentation that you're looking or potentially looking at AML. So just curious if he malignancy is an area you're interested in pursuing, and if so, how do you plan to build a franchise around that? Thank you.

Luis, thanks a lot for your questions. And I'll start and Lauren will probably jump in also as we go ahead. So for the first question regarded the results from the PDS-0101 NCI-led trial and how we believe the results impact the Keytruda trial. So one key thing to note with the NCI trial is the fact that this was a basket trial and contains a number of different cancers, including head and neck cancer, which is specific to the Keytruda trial. And we saw uniform efficacy across the various types of cancer, including head and neck cancer. And also very importantly, as Lauren described, the fact that we saw regression only in the HPV16 positive patient population suggests strongly that PDS0101 is specifically activating HPV16 CD8 T cells as it is designed to do. This is the specific population that we are also looking at with Keytruda. So the Keytruda study is specific to HPV 16 positive head and neck cancer. So the results we obtained from the NCI trial are highly encouraging based upon that supposed or implied activation of the CD8 T cells, which would be critical for the Keytruda trial. Now, we have seen synergy between checkpoint inhibitors and diverse immune technology in preclinical studies. So as you know, with the checkpoint inhibitors, Keytruda, for example, has been shown to be quite effective at blocking the tumor's defenses and making the cancer or the tumor cells much more visible to the immune system. And so we see strong synergy with these checkpoint inhibitors where once those tumors are made more visible to the immune system, Versamine, by training, recruiting, and generating a large number of T cells, can then go in and effectively kill the decamouflaged tumor cells. So that's the synergy that we are expecting with the CATRUDE trial, and that's what gives us a lot of what we believe is highly promising based upon the results that we have seen currently in the NCI-led trial. And Luis, does that answer the first question?

Yes, thank you.

Okay. I'll go to the TARP study next. So with TARP, as we mentioned, TARP is expressed in 100% of AML, approximately 90% of prostate cancers, and about 50% of breast cancers. Now, the initial study that has been performed by the NCI that validated TARP as a target for these cancers was done in prostate cancer. And as a risk mitigation strategy, the approach PDS has taken is actually to start with prostate cancer. With AML, we understand that it is heavily expressed in AML, but one of the things we want to do is to take our time and really understand that blood cancer space before we rush into performing clinical trials in the blood cancer. So we're initially starting with prostate and breast, and we will evaluate the AML space more closely before we actually get into any clinical trials for AML specifically. And then with PDS-0103, the Mach 1 cancerous, Again, so with that currently, what we are doing currently is looking at combinations with PDS-0103 at the NCI. These studies are currently being performed at the NCI, just like they did with PDS-0101. And then based upon those results, as Lauren mentioned, Those results will inform our clinical design and specifically what indications in Mach 1 and what stages of those cancers we will be addressing. But we will take a very close look and also just as we've done with PDS-0101, we do intend to be very strategic in addressing those cancers, looking at the potential of for whatever combination we go into in that specific population of patients that we start to address these trials in. We may actually start with a basket trial like we did with PDS0101 and to really understand exactly how it's impacting patients with the different types of cancers and then make the final decision as to which ones we believe provide the greatest opportunity for PDS biotech.

Thank you very much.

The next question is from Leland Gershaw of Oppenheimer and Company. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thanks, and congratulations on the progress. Question maybe for Lauren or Frank, you know, with respect to the Versatile trial, I know you re-edited the timelines for the initial data, you know, late this year or Q1. With 16, I think out of 26 sites activated, though, just kind of curious to ask about any impact that you're seeing from COVID-19 with respect to getting some of the remaining sites activated or with enrollment in various geographic spots and have a follow-up. Thank you.

Lauren, I'll hand that over to you.

Great. Yes. Thank you, Leland. As everyone experienced, we did experience initial impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. our experience since we have reactivated the trial as of last fall is that all of our institutions and partners that we're working with have already put in place well-established mitigation procedures to address COVID-19, and we've been able to progressively bring more and more sites on board. As the pandemic continues to evolve regionally and globally, there is the potential that sites may be impacted again in terms of constraints on local resources. However, one of the issues that we have heard continuously from all of our sites is that because Versatile 002 targets patients with advanced recurrent cancers that have high unmet medical needs, they are among the priority trials that are supported to continue enrolling. Again, our enrollment has picked up, and we do anticipate being able to report by the fourth quarter some initial data regarding safety or as early as first quarter of 2022.

Okay, thank you. And then one question, you know, kind of a higher altitude question. You know, as you continue to study diversity and platform in the context of different antigens, and particularly as you've you know, approach the completion of the preclinical work on 0102 with TARP, and you're also obviously looking at month one with 0103. I wanted to ask about what you're seeing in terms of, you know, the consistency with respect to the CD8 killer T cell potency and durability that you're getting, you know, when you apply it in these different contexts. If there's any more you can share in terms of the observations you've seen, you know, preclinically. Thank you.

Okay. So, Lauren, I can start with that. So, you know, I think that's an interesting question. And one question that we often get is, what's the impact when you combine self-antigens with Versamune, especially in some of these other cancers where the antigens may already be present, not due to a foreign agent? Now, this is what we're evaluating with the TARP, with MUC1, and we've also done that with TRP2 in melanoma. And in each of these cases, what we have found out is that with versamine, by being able to effectively recruit T cells and prime them to specifically recognize those antigens, that even though they are due to self-antigens in each and every one of these cases, we have seen CD8 T cell responses in the preclinical models very similar to what we saw with PDS0101. So it is highly suggestive. that if we can actually activate the right immunological pathways and effectively present the antigens into the right processing and presentation pathways, that we may be able, even with those self-antigen-based cancers, to generate very similar immune responses to what we see with PDS0101. And actually, the study that was done by the National Cancer Institute and led by Dr. Wood, looking at TARP in prostate cancer patients, It's also very highly suggestive that if properly presented, that we should be able to potentially generate similar levels of anti-tumor responses even with these other types of antigens. It appears to be highly dependent on effective recruitment, effective presentation, and activation of the right immunological signaling pathways.

Thank you for taking the questions.

The next question is from Joe Petkin of HC Wainwright. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, everyone. Good morning. Thank you for taking the question. Wanted to ask a question regarding your Pharmacore update for the COVID vaccine, Frank. I was just curious, you know, from a logistical standpoint in manufacturing the antigen, are there any technical issues that Pharmacore is experiencing, any logistical issues, and does this cause any sort of missing of contractual obligations?

Well, good question. I think these are some of the key questions that we are seeking to understand with the review that we're currently performing with Pharmacol. And so hopefully in the next couple of weeks, we will have a much better understanding of exactly what's going on. and exactly what the next steps could potentially be. But these are the key things that we are seeking to much better understand with our ongoing review of the program currently. Got it.

Thank you very much.

You're welcome.

The next question is from Robert Leboyer of Noble Capital. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, and thanks for the comprehensive review of all the data. Could you just give the milestones that are upcoming for the three trials in 0101?

Lauren, why don't you go ahead?

Sure. Good morning, Robert. Thanks for the question. So the key milestones for the NCI-led triple combination study, we anticipate accrual to that study is projected to complete during the first quarter of 2022. We also anticipate that more mature data regarding a greater complement of patients will be available in the first half of 2022. Regarding the PDS-sponsored Versatile 002 study, looking at PDS-0101 in combination with Keytruda, we project that we will have some preliminary data at the end of the fourth quarter or early Q1 of 2022. That specifically also includes the evaluation of the initial safety cohort, assessing the safety of the combination for the trial. And then for the MD Anderson-led trial of PDSO 101 in combination with standard of care chemo radiation therapy, we expect some preliminary data by the first half of 2022.

Great. Thank you very much.

The next question is from Jim Malloy of Alliance Global Partners. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I just had a quick question on the 75 million cash. As you allocate that to your pipeline, how do you see the allocation going between the multiple trials you have ongoing? And can you talk a little bit about, you know, does the infusion of cash, increase spend in any particular direction that perhaps before you'd been holding back on? And can you tell us about the runway currently?

Right. So I think we should have a lot more information on that shortly. So what we are doing currently is, as I mentioned, we're looking to get PDS-0102 and 0103 into human clinical trials next year. We also have relationships with the National Cancer Institute, And one of the other things that we would potentially want to do, as we discussed at R&D Day, is hopefully to move the triple combination into a pivotal trial sometime late next year, right? So, evaluating all those options. Now, moving into a pivotal trial involves discussions with our partners at the NCI and also with EMD Sirono. And those discussions will be initiated, as Lauren mentioned, we are looking to complete recruitment of that trial potentially early in the first quarter of next year. And what we want to do is to have enough data in the specific patient population before approaching the SBA to have discussions on what the regulatory pathway could potentially be. So that is in the works in terms of what we do there and how we progress that program. what we have assumed is that we are going to be financially responsible for at least one of the PDS-0102 trials moving forward. And what we are currently doing is in the process of designing that trial. So we will have more information once we understand exactly what that trial design is going to look like and how much that trial is going to cost. And with PDS-0103, as both Lauren and I mentioned, The work that's being done currently at the National Cancer Institute is also going to inform specifically that trial design. And the agreement we have under the crater with the NCI is that they would potentially fund that clinical trial. So, as you can see, there are a number of moving pieces that are currently in discussion. What we are confident about is the fact that we have the capital necessary to pursue these paths forward, but the specific details will depend on exactly what we're doing with our partners and the specific designs of those trials. And so we anticipate, based upon our projected forecast, that we should potentially have enough time with the capital we've raised to get to some meaningful interim data points for these trials that are currently going to be started before we have to go back to the markets. But we will have a lot more information on that once we have decided on exactly what the trial design is and how we're moving forward with any potential pivotal trial coming up.

Okay, great. Thank you. Then a quick follow-up. You'd mentioned, I think in the past, for the Phase 3 for the triple combo, of signing on a potential marketing partner beyond NCI, an industry partner. Any comments you can put around how those conversations may be going or any potential partnership conversations may be going in interest levels post the ASCO data?

Right. I think, as I mentioned, all parties are very interested and based upon the very promising data that was generated. We think there is a potential opportunity especially with the checkpoint inhibitor refractory patients because that's a patient population who have very few options for treatment, and the results were so encouraging in that population. However, it's one thing to go to the FDA with extremely good results in 12 patients versus going to the FDA with really good results in 30 patients, right? So I think what we all have decided to do is to give it some more time. Let's wait. to the fourth quarter or early first quarter when we have at least 30 patients recruited. And then based upon what the data looks like then, let's come up with a strategy and have initiated discussions with the FDA to determine what the best regulatory path would be and if there is some accelerated pathway we could potentially pursue. But we would like to have some data and a few more patients before we initiate those discussions with the FDA.

Great. Thank you for taking the questions. No problem.

As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. There are no additional questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back to Frank Bedouin for closing remarks.

Thank you very much. Thank you very much to all for your continued interest in PDS Biotech. We believe that 2021 will continue to be an exciting year for the company. We have multiple ongoing clinical trials of PDS0101 in various advanced HPV associated cancers. We appreciate your ongoing support in this pursuit. For more information about the company and our ongoing clinical trials, please visit our website at pdsbiotech.com. Thank you very much again.

This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.