This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk01: Ladies and gentlemen, you're currently on hold for today's RADnet third quarter 2020 financial results conference call. At this time, we are still admitting additional participants and do plan to be underway in approximately five minutes. We appreciate your patience and ask that you please remain on the line. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, again, you're on hold for today's RADnet Inc. Third Quarter 2020 Financial Results Call. At this time, we are submitting additional participants. We do plan to be underway momentarily. We appreciate your patience and ask you to please remain on the line. Thank you. Good day and welcome to the RadNet, Inc. Third Quarter 2020 Financial Results Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Mr. Mark Stolper, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RadNet. Please go ahead, sir. Thank you. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for joining Dr. Howard Berger and me today to discuss RadNet's Third Quarter 2020 Financial Results. Before we begin today, We'd like to remind everyone of the Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Specifically, statements concerning anticipated future financial and operating performance and liquidity, our response to and the expected future impact of COVID-19, our ability to stabilize and continue to grow the business by generating patient referrals and contracts with radiology practices, recruiting and retaining technologists, consummating acquisitions and joint ventures, receiving third-party reimbursement for diagnostic imaging services, successfully integrating acquired operations, generating revenue and adjusted EBITDA for the acquired operations as estimated, among others, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor. Forward-looking statements are based on management's current preliminary expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause RADNET's actual results to differ materially from the statements contained herein. These risks and uncertainties include those risks set forth in RADNET's reports filed with the SEC from time to time, including RADNET's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q to be filed shortly. Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements, especially guidance on future financial performance, which speaks only as of the date it is made. RADNET undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, events, or circumstances after the date they were made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. And with that, I'd like to turn the call over to Dr. Berger.
spk00: Thank you, Mark. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. On today's call, Mark and I plan to provide you with highlights from our third quarter 2020 results, give you more insight into factors which affected this performance, discuss in some detail the progress we made during this COVID-19 period, and give details about our future strategy. After our prepared remarks, we will open the call to your questions. I'd like to thank all of you for your interest in our company and for dedicating a portion of your day to participate in our conference call this morning. Before we start, I would like to say on behalf of myself and the entire team at RadNet, we hope all of you and your loved ones are healthy and staying safe. We are extremely grateful for all of our stakeholders, including our employees, business partners, lenders, and shareholders. Let's begin. I'm very pleased with the performance of our business in the third quarter. Our significantly improved revenue and profitability relative to the second quarter is the result of recovering procedural volumes and the multitude of cost savings and cash conservation measures we instituted throughout the COVID-19 period. Our revenue increased 53.1% sequentially from the second quarter, with a procedural volume increase of 66.2%, driving this top-line performance. This was an increase of $101.2 million in revenue from the second quarter's results. Perhaps even more notable was our improvement in adjusted EBITDA and earnings. Our adjusted EBITDA more than doubled from the second quarter, increasing from $22.6 million to $45.8 million. This difference would have been even greater had we not recognized $25.5 million of CARES Act funds in the second quarter. By comparison, we recorded only $221,000 of CARES Act funds in the third quarter. As compared to the third quarter of last year, despite our revenue being essentially flat, our adjusted EBITDA increased from $41.0 million to $45.8 million or 11.7%. This resulted in adjusted EBITDA margins increasing by 14% in last year's third quarter to 15.7%. Because many of the COVID-19 cost reduction initiatives which drove the improvement in margins are ongoing and not one time, we have the opportunity for sustained margin improvement in future quarters. Adjusted net income per share was 15 cents this year's third quarter as compared to adjusted net loss per share of 16 cents in the second quarter of this year and net income per share of 6 cents in last year's third quarter. This is a sequential increase of 31 cents per share from the second quarter of 2020 and 9 cents per share from last year's third quarter. As a result of the increase in our procedural volumes throughout the third quarter, a strong liquidity position and a cautiously optimistic belief that procedural volumes will continue to recover, I am pleased to report that as of August 1st, we began bringing back substantially all of our employees from furloughs and restored the wages of those team members who took pay reductions as a result of COVID-19. We completed this process on October 1st. I want to thank all of our team members for their patience and commitment during this difficult period. Our frontline imaging center employees continue to be the true heroes, ensuring access to care in a safe environment for the benefit of our referring physicians and patient communities. Currently, we have reopened all but 19 imaging centers, the majority of which are routine imaging satellite locations designed to alleviate the traffic in our larger more advanced multimodality facilities. As procedural lines continue to recover, we hopefully move beyond the COVID-19 period. We reevaluate opening facilities. The coronavirus pandemic allowed us a unique opportunity to focus on all aspects of our business, including center level, back office, and administrative operations, to create efficiencies and reduce costs. Prior to COVID-19, we spent several years significantly increasing the scope and breadth of our business through organic growth and acquisitions. While this expansion has been beneficial to our business in virtually every market in which we operate, COVID-19 allowed us to focus on ways to most effectively reduce expenses and conserve cash at a time when growth was not a priority. This optimization process over the last six months has brought great value to RADNET, value that not only was demonstrated in the third quarter, but that will continue to pay dividends into the future. The cost and liquidity saving measures, along with increasing procedural volumes, CARES Act funds, and Medicare advances, resulted in an $89.7 million cash balance at the quarter end, and are being undrawn on our $195 million revolving credit facility. This is the strongest liquidity position in the company's history. I'd like to also recognize the support we received from our relationship banks. At the end of August, we completed a $57.5 million upsize of our revolving credit facility. While our cash balance continues to be strong, The additional capacity provides us further financial flexibility to grow our business and execute our strategic plan. Along with our increased liquidity and improved financial results, our leverage declined by over a quarter of a turn in the quarter to under 4.25 times net debt to EBITDA. We expect that our leverage will return to under four times net debt to EBITDA in the coming quarters. Throughout the COVID period, our capitation business has remained an important feature of RadNet. Our capitation revenue increased 13.8% from the third quarter of last year. Because we get paid a fixed capitated amount per enrollee managed by the medical groups with whom we contract, our capitation revenue and the associated cash flow is dependent upon enrollment in these health plans. Throughout COVID-19, enrollment for these HMO patients with our contract with medical groups has remained intact as patients and their employees, even for those who have been furloughed, have continued to pay health care premiums. Subsequently, to the end of the third quarter, we announced a new partnership with Adventist Health, one of the largest health systems on the West Coast and Hawaii, to create an outpatient imaging joint venture in Simi Valley, California. Under the new joint venture, RadNet will contribute two of its imaging two of its Simi Valley Imaging Centers, Alamo Advanced Imaging and Simi Valley Advanced Imaging, and Adventist Health will contribute its Aspen Imaging Center. Redmond will also assume the operational management of Adventist Health's Nancy Reagan Breast Center. Adventist Health's assets in Simi Valley include the ownership of the Leading Hospital, an urgent care center, a clinical laboratory, home care services, and various family and specialty physician practices. The partnership is scheduled to begin operations in January. Two weeks ago, we announced the creation of a new operating platform in Phoenix, Arizona through a partnership with Dignity Health, Common Spirit Health. While this is our third venture with Dignity Health, this has ran its first entrance into a new geography since 2013 when we entered New York City. In conjunction with establishing the partnership, we've completed the acquisition, of AZTEC MRI and radiology and eight location multimodality radiology practice in Phoenix. We are extremely excited about the strategic expansion into Arizona. Phoenix in particular is a rapidly growing market and is home to almost 5 million people. Under venture, Radnet and Dignity will develop a network of multimodality outpatient centers, expanding the geographic coverage of the acquired locations through a combination of new site development and acquisition of existing radiology practices. Dignity Health is a leading health system in Phoenix and owns and operates multiple hospitals, medical groups, specialty care locations in this marketplace from which we can leverage our operations. Our focus will be to aggressively expand our footprint in order to both effectively service the Dignity-owned and affiliated physician groups and capture other patient volumes from competitive outpatient operators. We are committed to developing significant management focus and financial resources to drive the density and geographic concentration in Phoenix that has made it successful in our other core markets. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back over to Mark to discuss some of the highlights of our third quarter 2020 performance. When he's finished, I will make some closing remarks.
spk01: Thank you, Howard. I'm now going to briefly review our third quarter 2020 performance and attempt to highlight what I believe to be some material items. I will also give some further explanation of certain items in our financial statements, as well as provide some insights into some of the metrics that drove our third quarter 2020 performance. In my discussion, I will use the term adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. The company defines adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization and excludes losses or gains on the disposal of equipment, other income or loss, loss on debt extinguishments, and non-cash equity compensation. Adjusted EBITDA includes equity earnings in unconsolidated operations and subtracts allocations of earnings to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries and is adjusted for non-cash or extraordinary and one-time events taking place during the period. A full quantitative reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income or loss attributable to RadNet Inc. common shareholders is included in our earnings release and our current report on Form 8K filed with the SEC. With that said, I'd now like to review our third quarter results. For the third quarter of 2020, RadNet reported revenue of $291.8 million and adjusted EBITDA of $45.8 million. As Dr. Durberger discussed in his remarks, this performance was a significant improvement from these metrics in the second quarter and is reflective of a major recovery of our business from the impacts of COVID-19. Compared to the second quarter of this year, revenue increased $101.2 million, or 53.1%, and adjusted EBITDA increased $23.2 million, or 102.8%. Relative to last year's third quarter, a quarter that was not impacted by COVID-19, revenue decreased only by $916,000, or 0.3%, and adjusted EBITDA increased $4.8 million, or 11.7%. Our adjusted EBITDA margin increased 385 basis points, or 3.9%, from the second quarter of 2020, and exceeded last year's third quarter by 169 basis points, or 1.7%. The increase in adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin relative to last year's third quarter is primarily the result of the cost savings measures we took during COVID-19, many of which should aid our business into the future. For the third quarter of 2020, as compared to the prior year's third quarter, MRI volume decreased 6.1% CT volume was flat, and PET CT volume increased 0.4%. Overall volume, taking into account routine imaging exams inclusive of the x-ray, ultrasound, mammography, and all other exams, decreased 5.7% from the prior year's third quarter. On a same-center basis, including only those centers which were part of RADNET for both the third quarters of 2020 and 2019, MRI volume decreased 5.8%, CT volume decreased 0.9%, and PET-CT volume increased 2.3%. Overall, same center volume, taking into account all routine imaging exams, decreased 5.6% compared to the prior year same quarter. Relative to the second quarter of this year, aggregate procedural volumes, inclusive of all modalities, increased In the third quarter of 2020, we performed 1,890,156 total procedures. The procedures were consistent with our multimodality approach, whereby 76.5% of all the work we did by volume was from routine imaging. Our procedures in the third quarter of 2020 were as follows. Please note that the CT volumes for last year have been restated to account for a change we made as of January 1st of this year in how we account for one of our CT CPT codes. The comparative numbers that follow are on an apples to apples basis. 266,049 MRIs as compared with 283,221 MRIs in the third quarter of 2019. 167,005 CTs as compared with 167,078 CTs in the third quarter of 2019, 10,886 PET CTs as compared with 10,847 PET CTs in the third quarter of 2019, and 1,446,216 routine imaging exams which include nuclear medicine, ultrasound, mammography, x-ray, and all other exams, as compared with 1,544,026 of all these exams in the third quarter of 2019. For the third quarter, RodNet reported net income attributable to RodNet Inc. common shareholders of $6.2 million, an increase of approximately $3 million from the third quarter of 2019. Because sequentially relative to the second quarter of this year, net income increased $16.8 million. Net income per share for the third quarter of 2020 was 12 cents compared to net income per share in the third quarter of 2019 of 6 cents based upon weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding of $52 million in 2000, excuse me, 52 million shares in 2020 and 50.4 million shares in 2019. Adjusting for the non-cash impact of the company's interest rate hedges in this year's third quarter, adjusted net income was 15 cents per share. This compares to adjusted net loss per share of negative 16 cents in the second quarter of 2020. Affecting net income in the third quarter of 2020 were certain non-cash expenses or non-reincurring items, including the following. $2.1 million of non-cash employee stock compensation expense resulting from the vesting of certain options and restricted stock. $571,000 of severance paid in connection with headcount reductions related to cost savings initiatives. $342,000 loss on the sale or disposal of certain capital equipment, $2 million of non-cash impact from interest rate hedges, and $1.1 million of amortization of deferred financing costs and non-cash interest on loan discounts related to our credit facilities. Overall gap interest expense for the third quarter of 2020 was $11.1 million. This compares with gap interest expense in the third quarter of 2019 of $11.9 million. Cash paid for interest during the period which excludes non-cash deferred financing expense and accrued interest is $8.4 million as compared with $12.8 million in the third quarter of last year. With regards to our balance sheet, as of September 30, 2020, unadjusted for bond and term loan discounts, we had $591.7 million of net debt, which is our total debt at par value less our cash balance. Note that this debt balance includes New Jersey Imaging Network's debt of approximately $54.5 million, for which RadNet is neither a borrower nor guarantor. This compares with $687.3 million of net debt at September 30, 2019. As of September 30, 2020, we were undrawn on our $195 million revolving line of credit and had a cash balance of $89.7 million. As Dr. Berger mentioned in his prepared remarks, we upsized our revolver commitment with our relationship banks by $57.5 million in August of this year. While we have not needed to access this liquidity, the larger revolver provides us additional operating flexibility and funds available for future growth should we require it. At September 30, 2020, our accounts receivable balance was $137.4 million, a decrease of $17.4 million from year-end 2019. The decrease in accounts receivable is mainly the result of the decline in our procedural volumes and revenue during the COVID-19 period and our significant cash collections on previously existing accounts receivable. Our Days Sales Outstanding, or DSO, was 39.2 days at September 30, 2020, lower by approximately 5.4 days as of year end 2019. The lower DSO is primarily a function of a return to more normalized revenue during the last two months of the third quarter. As revenue and accounts receivable normalize post-COVID-19, we expect DSOs to return to the low to mid-40s level. Through September 30, 2020, we have total capital expenditures, net of asset dispositions of $71.8 million. This excludes $5.5 million of capital expenditures of New Jersey Imaging Network, our joint venture with RWJBarnabas. I'll now take a few minutes to give you an update on 2021 reimbursement. and discuss what we know with regards to 2021 anticipated Medicare rates. As some of you may recall from our second quarter financial results call, with respect to Medicare reimbursement, we received a matrix for proposed rates by CPT code in August, which is typically part of the physician fee schedule proposal that is released about that time every year. We completed an initial analysis and compared those rates to 2020 rates. We volume-weighted our analysis using expected 2021 procedure volumes. CMS moved forward with an increased reimbursement for evaluation and management CPT codes, which favor certain physician specialties that regularly bill for these services, particularly primary care doctors. CMS proposed doing so with budget neutrality, meaning that it proposed to reallocate reimbursement from physicians who rarely bill for E&M codes, such as radiologists, to physicians who regularly bill for these codes, such as primary care physicians. In the proposed rule, CMS initiated a 10.6% decrease in the conversion factor used to calculate Medicare reimbursement for all specialties in 2021. For radiology, CMS made a material upward adjustment to the technical RVUs in the reimbursement formula. These RVUs are multiplied by this now lower conversion factor to determine our reimbursement. Our analysis of these opposing forces showed that Radnet will suffer approximately $11 million revenue hit in 2021 from our Medicare Book of Business. There are many lobbying groups from the various medical specialties aggressively opposing the budget neutrality aspect of the E&M code reimbursement changes, including Radiology's two main lobbying forces, the Association for Quality Imaging, or AQI, and the American College of Radiology, or ACR. Late last month, U.S. Representative Vera a Democrat from California, and Bouchon, a Republican from Indiana, introduced bipartisan legislation to provide relief to physicians responding to the COVID-19 pandemic who are scheduled to receive these Medicare payment cuts next year. The bill would provide a temporary additional payment in the amount of the difference between 2020 and 2021 Medicare reimbursement for two years for the specialties like radiology that are facing the Medicare cut. We should know more in December when the final rule is released and when it is determined if the Vera Bouchon bill will be attached to federal funding bills expected to be put in place in mid-December. I'd now like to turn the call back to Dr. Berger who will make some closing remarks.
spk00: Thank you, Mark. The coronavirus pandemic has allowed us to take a pause from the rapid growth path we have followed over the last several years and evaluate all aspects of our business. The efficiencies we created during this period position our operations for a strong performance in 2021. Furthermore, we ended 2021 with the strongest liquidity position in the company's history. Besides continuing to drive growth and efficiency in our core imaging center business, we will further pursue ancillary opportunities to drive revenue, increase margins, and reduce costs. For example, this year we installed our first installation of the Tulsa Pro system, an incision-free thermal ultrasound system designed to treat prostate disease. We have begun to see patients at one of our Los Angeles area locations and are eager to expand this business as this new procedure is adopted and continues to drive demand. Another ancillary opportunity we have been aggressively pursuing is our commitment to artificial intelligence. In the second quarter of this year, we completed the acquisition of Deep Health, which has become the cornerstone of our artificial intelligence strategy. We are on track to submit for our first approval to the federal Drug Administration, Deep Health's first mammography product by end of year. We hope to be utilizing Deep Health's first AI product in our workflow in the second half of next year, which we believe will enable our radiologists to be more accurate and efficient. As we move into 2021, health system joint ventures will be another ancillary opportunity for growth. Currently, over 25% of our facilities are jointly owned with community hospitals and large health systems. And with the Dignity Partnership in Phoenix, we have demonstrated our willingness to enter new geographic markets in conjunction with entrenched partners. These partnerships, on average, drive higher margins in our wholly owned centers and assist us in securing fair long-term pricing with regional payors. In the third quarter, we announced a multifaceted collaboration agreement with Hologic focused on improving women's health. Hologic will contribute capabilities and insights behind its market-leading hardware and software, and we will share data with Hologic produced by our fleet of high-resolution mammography systems, the largest in the nation. The data will be used to train and refine current and future products based on artificial intelligence. Both companies will work together to enable new joint market opportunities and further efforts to build clinician confidence and develop and integrate new artificial intelligence technologies. In conclusion, even in this challenging time, we continue to be very optimistic about the future of RedNet. We expect to emerge from COVID as the best position company in our industry, and we're excited to keep you apprised of our progress in the coming quarters. Operator, we are now ready for the question and answer portion of the call.
spk01: Thank you, sir. If you'd like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star 1 on your telephone pad. If you are using a speakerphone, please make sure that your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. Once again, that is star 1 if you'd like to ask a question or pause for just a moment to allow everyone an opportunity to signal. I think that is star one. We'll take our first question from Brian with Jefferies. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, guys. Congrats on a solid quarter. I guess, Mark, my first question, just to follow up on your comments on the Medicare rules, if you don't mind just reminding us how you're thinking about the impact on your P&L if the proposed rule goes through as it is. And then I think you talked about timing. How do they think or how do you guys think they're going to implement a 1-1 cut if we haven't had any rules set out yet and we're already deep into November? Sure. Thank you, Brian. So the conversion factor is declining from $36.09 to $32.26, which is a 10.6% decrease. So to the extent that the RVUs were to stay the same, you know, per CPT code in radiology, all radiology providers would be facing a 10.6% decline in their reimbursement. But that's not what Medicare did. Essentially what Medicare did is they – the RVU calculation, as you're aware, consists of, you know, the – a technical portion of the RVU and a professional portion of the RVU. For the professional portion of the RVU, they either, depending upon the modality of the CPT code, they either kept it the same or they actually, on average, decreased the professional RVUs to the tune of 1.2%. So most of the professional-only models, such as hospital-based radiologists, next year, if the proposed cut goes into place are facing really an 11 to 12 percent hit on the various CPT codes. But for the technical RVUs, they actually increased the technical RVUs across the board. I'll give you a couple examples. For instance, our two X-rays are our largest procedure by volume and our two most common x-ray procedures are a two-view chest x-ray and then the x-ray of the spine, lumbosacral, which is a four-view x-ray. And the technical RVUs are going up for each of those by 8.7% and 10.3% respectively. So the increase in the technical RVUs is partially mitigating the decrease in the conversion factor, and that's happened across the board. For instance, in CT, our most common CPT codes is the CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and the global RVUs of that is going up by 7.3%. So you can see what they've tried to do for imaging centers After eight years, and you're aware of this, of decreasing the technical RVUs from 2007 to 2014 and not changing the professional RVUs, what they're doing now is essentially adjusting the professional component. Where we are seeing the cut, and our cut, you know, across the board, it comes out to about 5%, which, you know, which equals that $11 million or so number that I talked about. Where we are going to be seeing a cut if the proposal goes into place as proposed would be in NAMO where the global RVUs And the technical side of the RVUs really is not changing, so we're going to see a full 10% cut there. So it really depends upon your CPT code mix. And when we did our analysis for 2021, we weighted it by our actual CPT code mix or expected CPT code mix for 2021. With respect to this Barabouchon bill, that's out there, what it is proposing to do is essentially make up the difference between 2020 and 2021 with an additional payment to providers. And the proposal, I think because of COVID-19, the final rule isn't now supposed to come out until December 1st. And this Barabushan bill is if it goes into place, would be part of the overall government spending bill that I think needs to be passed, I think, by December 11th, if I remember correctly. So we'll find out more, let's say, mid-December about whether this proposed cut will go into place. And as I said, there's a lot of industry lobbying groups, and not just from radiology, but all of the specialties that don't bill E&M codes who are facing a significant reimbursement cut. There's a lot of cooperation between the various industry groups to try to push back on these cuts going into place. So from our standpoint, we're prepared for the cuts to go into place. We have a number of mitigants that we think will fully counteract, you know, the $11 million or so of cuts. And we'll just kind of have to wait, you know, over the next 30 days and see where the government's coming out. Hey, Mark, so, okay, so just to summarize that, so basically versus what you thought the cuts would impact you or how they would impact you from what your comments accuse you, nothing has changed, right? Like, you've done more work, it's the same exact number, $11 million, give or take. Correct. Okay, cool, awesome. And then I guess if you don't mind just giving us some comments on the Arizona strategy. So this is obviously the first time we're seeing you go into a new market in a while, and it's not continuous to an existing operation. So if you don't mind just describing what you saw in the Arizona market that made you decide to go in, and is this something that you think we would see more of as you replicate that entry strategy? Arizona obviously is close to your California operations. Is that a factor, or are you willing to go into completely new geographies?
spk00: Thank you, Brian. I'll take that. The entrance into the Phoenix market was really a combination of factors. First and foremost, it's an extension of an existing relationship that we have with the Dignity Health System, which has now, as you are aware, become part of the common spirit after a merger with Catholic Healthcare Initiatives. So we were introduced very favorably to the leadership in Phoenix, and they asked us to really help them with an outpatient imaging strategy in that marketplace. Given that, we also had an opportunity to buy eight centers in that market through an existing relationship with the White Rabbit company that we do business with. we found a good combination of circumstances that made it attractive to us. As I had said on previous close calls, while we would be interested in going into new markets, we needed really two factors to be a part of that decision making. And it really has nothing to do with the geographic closeness of existing markets, but more with the dynamics in a marketplace. One is Could we find a good partner to enter a new market that, like Dignity, was looking for assistance with developing an outpatient strategy? And was there a path for us, like we have in all of our other markets, to have considerable growth and be a very substantial player in that market? We fortunately found both of those in the Phoenix market, which also is a rapidly growing market, perhaps one of the fastest in the country. And in the Phoenix market, where most of these initial centers are, of over 5 million people, becomes similar to other markets that we have entered. Not entered, but that we're already currently in. So I think the mix of opportunities there created a very nice pathway for us Also, it shouldn't go unnoticed that a few weeks ago, Cigna Health announced that they were no longer going to be reimbursing outpatient imaging performed in hospitals except for certain circumstances. And I think that that is additionally kind of forcing some of these hospital and health systems to reevaluate the inevitable transition out of hospitals of ancillary outpatient services such as outpatient imaging. So while this may be the first new market that we've entered into since 2013, I think that there will be other conversations that we'll continue to have with health systems that look to the leader in outpatient imaging, namely RadNet, to assist them in that process.
spk01: Yeah, and Dignity is a unique partner in that particular market. They have a tremendous breadth of operations there. In addition, Brian, to owning eight hospitals, either owning or affiliated with eight hospitals, They're also a big player in the medical groups there in Phoenix. They own one medical group that has 100,000 lives called Dignity Medical Group. They have a 50% ownership in two other significant medical groups there, one called Arizona Care Network, another one called Mercy Care. Each one of those has 300,000 lives, and we're talking about 600,000 lives there. and they are aligned with another medical group called Integrated Medical Services there that has 100,000 lives. So between that, there are eight hospitals, an urgent care center network that they own, an affiliation with Barrow Neuroscience Institute, as well as the Phoenix Children's Hospital and others there. They control a tremendous, or they have influence over a tremendous amount of imaging. which currently is going to competitive imaging centers. So we think as we devote focus on resources, as we build centers along with in conjunction with Dignity, as we purchase other centers in that marketplace and significantly broaden our scale and our access In Phoenix, we believe that we have a strong opportunity to capture a lot of those lives and patient volume. That's awesome. Then, Mark, just from a recovery trend perspective, would you be able to share with us how volumes trended over the course of the quarter and any comment you can share on how things are trending through October, you know, considering obviously the resurgence of COVID and a lot of new markets, a lot of markets and also the wildfires in California.
spk00: Brian, I'll take that one. Go ahead, Howard. Go ahead. What we saw in the third quarter was a steady increase beginning this primarily in the middle of August and extending through the end of the quarter, September. And by the end of September, we were approaching on a company-wide basis about 95% of our original 2020 budget estimates in volume. October and the early part of November here. So our forecasting of the procedural volume increases that started in early August was very instrumental in allowing us to bring back, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, substantially all of our staff at our imaging centers and by October 1st bring everybody back to their full compensation. Fortunately, I believe that the benefits that we saw in the third quarter, some of which were as a result of lower salaries, and other accommodations made with some of our vendors have now allowed us to anticipate the increased costs from going back to normal staffing and what we're expecting to be a nice increase in revenue for the whole of the fourth quarter as opposed to the somewhat average in lower volumes for the whole of the third quarter. That's awesome, Howard.
spk01: And then I guess just the last question for me to follow up on that. Mark or Howard, I mean, how are you thinking about the durability of the cost savings initiatives that you've put through? I know, Howard, you just said that you've reinstated a lot of the compensation. So how should we be thinking about the cost structure as we look at Q4 going forward?
spk00: Thank you. Okay, Brian. Well, I think... The pause, as I referred to it, during the second and third quarters has allowed us to look at many factors of the company's operations, which I think uniquely was created by the markedly reduced volumes that we saw in April and May predominantly. Because the company had grown so rapidly, primarily through acquisitions, we found that we did have a number of centers relatively close to each other that patients, given the circumstances, were willing to travel to more than we might have thought in the past. So I think coming out of this year, we have created a lot of operational efficiencies, both from the staffing standpoint and the number of facilities that we need to operate. And I believe the combination of those will create some improvement in our performance, which we mentioned. And I think perhaps the best way to look at this, Brian, would be that the margin expansion that we saw in the third quarter is what we're going to focus on to try to replicate in forward-going quarters. So, of course, that's subject to perhaps some of the cuts in the Medicare reimbursement should they go through, which would hurt those margins a little bit. But I think the additional cost savings that have not been fully implemented that we anticipate in 2021 will help mitigate that along with sustaining what I think is a better workflows and efficiencies in our staffing. So I think perhaps looking at our margins going forward would be the best way to estimate what the sustainability of the cost savings are. Awesome. Thanks, Howard. Thank you, Brian. Take care. Thank you.
spk01: We'll now take our next question from Mitra Ramgopal with the DOTI.
spk02: Yes, hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. First, just trying to get a sense in terms of the volume rebound. You saw clearly the environment is much better with easing of the lockdown restrictions, et cetera. But I was curious also if you were seeing any benefit as a result of maybe some of your competitors not being able to survive the pandemic.
spk00: Well, I think the... Good morning, I should say, Metro. I think that there's two facets to answer your question. As far as our competitors are concerned, I think that the impact of COVID will be something that we'll see more of in 2021 as some of our competitors who have not had the financial resources that we have. as well as potentially the looming cuts in Medicare, force them to consider the viability of their own businesses. So I think the liquidity position that we're in has put us in a good position to potentially take benefit from that. As far as volumes are concerned, I think there's a myriad of factors that play both ways on that. First of all, I think it should be understood that once volumes do have come back substantially to the pre-COVID levels, I believe that there will be a number of people who still remain reluctant to come out of isolation to access not just healthcare, but parts of the environment. And I believe that will stay that way for probably well into 2021 when hopefully, as was announced this morning by Pfizer, we come closer to a vaccine that is not only effective but will be sought after by the majority of people. We do have some anecdotal evidence that that is indeed the case because the one largest portion of our business, meaning x-ray business, is the one that has not as yet returned to the pre-COVID levels. And I believe that's explained by the fact that there is still a number of people who aren't accessing routine health or physicals or other minor problems. One, number two, elective surgeries are still down, and those people who conditionally get chest x-rays or other procedures by getting surgery is also down. So I think those will trail and they'll rebound more in the second half of the next year. Fortunately, x-rays are not a major problem. driver in our truck. I believe part of the turn to normal volumes is the fact that people were not accessing health care as necessary and now seem to be able to rebound that pent up. So I think those two kind of counteract each other. Somewhere in the mix there, I think you put into the factors that people like Cigna and other health insurers are beginning to make major rides to directing people away from hospitals. And people themselves perhaps now look at outpatient ancillary services, particularly imaging, in a little bit more of a rational light, given the fact that they have to go into the environment of a hospital. I think all of those factors have weighed in and will continue to improve for us, particularly going to the latter half of 2021.
spk02: Okay, no, that's great. Thanks for the call on that. And then I'm just curious on the margin. Obviously, we saw a really nice EBITDA margin expansion, and you've certainly rationalized the business to deal with the COVID impact. I'm just curious going forward now, you know, how quickly we should expect those savings to continue to flow through versus maybe balancing the need or some of the growth opportunities you've talked about, whether it's in mammography and elsewhere.
spk00: Well, I think mnemography, and I'm glad you mentioned that, Mitchell, has been and will continue to be a major focus of the company's efforts. In the collaboration agreement that we announced with Hologic, part of that is to take almost all of our 300 mnemography systems to the new Hologic facility. high definition platform and make those a unique state of the art opportunity that will be the first of its kind really in the United States. And then putting on top of that the artificial intelligence that we hope to have beginning approval from the FDA in the early part of the year will allow us I think to have a competitive advantage as well as expand the offerings that we have in a way that's unlike any other operator out there, whether it's hospital-based or outpatient imaging. Putting those together, currently we're doing about 4% of all the mammography in the United States, and we believe fitting our centers with new technology and our own artificial intelligence will allow us to expand and increase that percentage even more than it is right now. So I think you can look to the mammography portion of our business continuing to grow disproportionately to the rest of the business. And it in and of itself, I think, is a potential harbinger of where we as a company want to go with other screening procedures, particularly for prostate, colon, and chest, to make these similar to mammography, something that can be ordered by individual themselves and supported by the insurance companies as part of wellness practices. hope to advance in 2021. I expect that you'll be hearing more of that from us also.
spk02: Okay. No, thanks. And then finally, as you mentioned, you're probably going to be the best place to operate it coming out of the pandemic in the industry. I was just curious if, you know, we should expect you to be even more aggressive in terms of expansion plans. You obviously just announced a new JV and an expanded relationship. I'm just wondering what the pipeline looks like and also the appetite for M&A.
spk00: Well, the pipeline has always been good here. Generally speaking, we don't go knocking on doors looking for acquisitions. We want motivated fellows, if you will, or opportunities that come our way. And we expect that those will increase in 2021. particularly if the Medicare reimbursement cuts are implemented. I think it's just going to make it that much more difficult for the traditional mom and pop and smaller operator to be viable. So we will remain disciplined. Part of our growth strategy, since we've achieved leverage ratios that we're very pleased with and hope to even lower, we need to continue to be disciplined about how we do our acquisitions to make certain that the company does not leverage itself higher than what we believe are comfortable levels. And in fact, we're looking to improve upon that. So I think we've had a disciplined growth strategy. It may very well be, particularly on the East Coast where we have demand in some of the markets, particularly in the New York marketplace, that we may need to build more centers if we don't find the opportunities for acquisitions that we feel. Okay.
spk02: Thanks again for taking the questions.
spk01: Thank you. We'll now take our next question from John Ranton with Raymond James. Good morning. Mark, the $11 million that you cited, does that include all the commercial contracts also tied to Medicare, or is that just Medicare? That's just Medicare. We have very few contracts that are tied to Medicare. When we were living through the Deficit Reduction Act in the seven, eight years, that That followed where Medicare was hitting reimbursement. We did a pretty good job of unbundling most of our commercial contracts from Medicare. We still have some, John, for instance, the Medicare Advantage plans for the most part are still tied to Medicare reimbursement, so those will adjust. But it's not going to be a material amount, maybe another couple to a few million bucks.
spk00: Okay. Second question is, okay, let's just assume that it's $13, $14 million bad guy.
spk01: What's the good guy in terms of fully realized cuts in 21 versus a partial year in 20? Say that again. It was a little tough to hear you. The good guy as it relates to what? Just the timing of having your cuts in place for the full year versus a partial year. So in other words, we cut. take up a number, $10 million, but we only got 6 million and 20, but we'll get the full 10 million in 21, so the net would be four.
spk00: We plan on having most of all of the cost savings initiatives that we're working on right now in place for the beginning of 2021, and I'm talking about January. So as we finalize our budgets for 2021, we will have the vast majority of our cost savings initiatives in our 2021 budgets.
spk01: Just, I mean, quantitatively, there is a pickup because you have a full year of those savings versus a partial year this year? Because you really didn't go into overdrive until maybe, what, March, April? So is there an offsetting effect, or am I just making this up? I mean, yes. I mean, if you... If you were to look at the third quarter results and its margins and what we produce in the fourth quarter, that will probably give you a pretty good indication of kind of our run rate going into next year. Obviously, there's some seasonality in this business. As you're aware, John, first quarter tends to be our most difficult quarter because of the reset of deductibles. as well as weather conditions on the East Coast, which tend to make our first quarter volatile year over year. But aside from that, if you were to take our second and third quarter, excuse me, our third and fourth quarter, which is obviously yet to be announced, into next year, that will give you kind of, I think, a pretty good indication of the type of expensive savings that you can annualize into next year. Okay. And then lastly for me, what strikes me as being positive for you but a little odd is you operate in a couple of the toughest lockdown states in the U.S., California, and New York. And if you talk to, say, other providers, they're still seeing volumes down, call it high single, low double digits in those markets. But you're kind of back to flat. Is there maybe some catch-up? due to timing, you know, that people are just rescheduling procedures and there might be another little bit of an air pocket? Or do you have any reason why your volumes would be, you know, higher than, say, physician office visits in some of those markets or ER visits or that sort of thing? I'm just... Yeah, you guys are doing much better than I thought you would just given your location.
spk00: Hi, John. Yes, I think what's happened is... Radiology and imaging, while it's an elective procedure, is really an essential procedure. And I think as more and more of the articles come out about the reduction in healthcare, what people are recognizing is delayed healthcare is bad healthcare, and it's more costly to the system. So I think in the case of outpatient imaging, two factors are involved. Number one, people have determined that they'd rather be in an outpatient setting where the practice of safety measures can be more enhanced than it can be in hospitals, number one. And number two, taking mammography for an example, you can delay that, but it's something that people estimate every month of delay is costly in terms of the potential morbidity and mortality related to breast cancer. So delaying some of these procedures has been something that I think is now being recognized as unadvisable, number one. Number two, I think just in general, we've recovered very nicely in New York, which was the most locked down market back in April and early May. And although we saw those reductions, we saw a very quick return in those markets, disproportionate to the way other businesses are being handled. So I think it's a matter of doctors going back into their offices and more business being directed, into outpatient centers than it is necessarily people not wanting to access appropriate health care.
spk02: Great. Thanks so much.
spk01: Thank you. And that does conclude today's question and answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to management for any additional closing remarks.
spk00: Again, I would like to take the opportunity to thank all of our shareholders for their continued support. and particularly the employees of RARNET for their dedication and hard work. NANPR will continue its endeavor to be the market leader that provides great services with an appropriate return on investment for all stakeholders. Thank you for your time today, and I look forward to our next call. I wish all of you and your families good health and safety during this unprecedented time.
spk01: Thank you. That does conclude today's conference. Thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer