This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Good day, and welcome to the Rigetti Computing second quarter 2023 financial results call. At this time, all participants are listening on remote. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. Instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would like to turn the call over to Sabahat Kulkarni. You may begin.
spk01: Good afternoon, and thank you for participating in Rigetti's earnings conference call covering the second quarter of 2023. Joining me today is Jeff Bertelsen, our CFO, who will review our results in some detail following my overview. Our CTO, David Rivas, is also here to participate in the Q&A session. We will be pleased to answer your questions at the conclusion of our remarks. We would like to point out that this call and Rigetti's Q2 2023 press release contain forward-looking statements regarding current expectations, objectives, and underlying assumptions regarding our outlook and future operating results. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described and are discussed in more detail in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, our Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30th, 2023, and our subsequent filings with the SEC and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We urge you to review these discussions of risk factors. Turning now to the business of the second quarter of 2023, I'm pleased to report our belief that we remain on track to reach our year-end technology milestones with our fourth generation system. After having launched ANCA-1 internally, We are excited to have our longtime partner, River Lane, as the first external partner using the system to work on improving error correction techniques on our new architecture. We also look forward to making our most innovative quantum system available to the general public in Q4 of this year. As previously disclosed, we are continuing to work to improve ANCA-1 performance with the goal of reaching median two-qubit fidelity of 98% to support the anticipated ANCA-2 84-qubit system. Our ANCA-2 84-qubit system with anticipated improvements in design and performance is expected to be deployed and made available to external customers in the fourth quarter of 2023. We remain committed to working to achieve median two-qubit fidelity of 99% with the anticipated ANCA-2, which we expect to be achieved in 2024 and development of the 336-qubit Lyra system thereafter. We also recently announced that we signed a collaboration agreement with ADIA Lab to design, build, execute, and optimize a quantum computing solution intended to address the probability distribution classification problem, which has many direct applications to practical use cases in the investment industry. Tackling real-world computationally challenging problems like this is an important part of working towards narrow quantum advantage. I'm also very pleased to announce that we recently completed our first QPU sale, which went to a national lab. We delivered a nine-qubit QPU and associated hardware to the lab, which features a square lattice with tunable couplers that can perform entangling two-qubit gate operations. We are starting to see positive impacts following the implementation of our updated business strategy. we announced in February 2023, which is designed to improve our focus, operating efficiency, and preserve cash resources. At our current stage of development, we believe that executing toward our roadmap and achieving our technology milestones are key to fueling our goal of achieving quantum advantage. We remain focused on meeting our objectives. And with that, I'll now turn the call over to Jeff who will review our second quarter 2023 financial performance.
spk05: Thanks, Subodh. Revenues in the second quarter of 2023 were $3.3 million compared to $2.1 million in the same period of 2022. Revenue variability is to be expected at this stage of the company's evolution given the nature of contract timing with major government agencies. Our development contracts also primarily consist of technical milestone-based work or cost share arrangements with revenue recognition varying according to the timing of deliverables. Gross margins in the second quarter of 2023 came in at 82%, up from gross margins in the second quarter of 2022 of 59%. The improvement in total gross profit is primarily due to the significant variability in the pricing in terms of our development contracts. On the expense side, total OPEX in the second quarter of 2023 was 19 million compared to 27 million in the same period in the prior year. The year-over-year decrease was primarily due to a reduction in stock compensation expense. Other decreases in the second quarter of 2023 included lower professional fees and lower employee wages and benefit costs resulting from our February 2023 reduction in workforce. The change in the fair value of the forward agreement for the Ampere warrant increased G&A expense by $44,000 in the second quarter of 2023, compared with a $2.1 million reduction in G&A expense in the second quarter of 2022. In the second quarter of 2023, stock compensation expense totaled 3.4 million, and depreciation and amortization expense totaled 2.2 million, compared to $11 million and $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2022, respectively. Operating loss for the second quarter of 2023 was 16.2 million. compared to an operating loss of $25.8 million for the same period of 2022. Net loss for the second quarter of 2023 was $17 million, or 13 cents per share, compared to a net loss of $12.3 million, or 11 cents per share, for the same period of 2022. Net loss for the second quarter of 2022 was favorably impacted by changes in the liability for the earn out and derivative warrant liabilities of $6.6 million and $8 million, respectively. Cash, cash equivalents and available for sale investments totaled $105.5 million as of June 30, 2023, compared with $122 million as of March 31, 2023. During the second quarter of 2023, we raised 2.348 million from the sale of 1.869 million shares of common stock under our common stock purchase agreement with B. Reilly. Based on our current operating plan, we expect to have cash, cash equivalents and available for sale securities of between 65 and 75 million at the end of 2023. At this time, based on our current operating plan, we anticipate that Rigetti will need to raise additional funding by late 2024, early 2025 to continue its research and development efforts and achieve its business objectives. Thank you. We would now be happy to answer your questions.
spk00: Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1-1. If your question has been answered and you'd like to remove yourself in the queue, please press star 1-1 again. Our first question comes from Quinn Bolton with Needham and Company. Your line is open.
spk04: Hey, guys. Congratulations on the technical progress in the quarter. Great to see you're still on track for the 98% to Qubit gate fidelity by year end. I guess, Subodh, I wanted to ask, you know, kind of great to see the first QPU sale in the second quarter. Wondering a couple of things. First, Of the 3.3 million, can you quantify how much of that is more development contracts versus the QPU sale? And then perhaps a more important question looking forward, are you now starting to see greater interest from national labs, other government agencies, and perhaps even on the commercial side, growing interest in the sale of complete systems? And could that become a meaningful portion of the revenue stream for the business going forward? Thank you.
spk01: Thanks, Gwen. Excellent questions. So our first question is regarding the revenue breakdown. Majority of it is still coming from research contracts, although the QPU sale obviously contributed. We don't want to quantify the exact price of 9-qubit QPU for obvious reasons, but suffice it to say for customers who have dilution refrigerators, in their position, the price for a nine qubit QPU is going to be under a million dollars. So that gives you a frame of reference of what we are talking about here. So the majority of the revenue still comes from DOE, DOD type contracts, and cloud service, obviously, AWS, Azure, as well as our cloud, they all contributed as well during the quarter. Now for the more important and exciting part of your question as to what do we think will happen to the QPU sales pipeline, if you will, that's what you are getting at. Certainly we are very, very excited to see the interest we saw from the first sale we did with the National Lab and the pipeline that seems to be coming along. A lot of customers are expressing interest in a nine qubit QPU, particularly with the tunable coupler and the performance you get with the nine qubit. Most of the applications are research applications. So for things like optimized control and pulse design or materials research or simple algorithmic research, basic characterizations, measurements, student training, that kind of stuff. So primarily research, so we certainly still are not anywhere close to quantum advantage or even narrow quantum advantage. So it's mostly being used for research purposes. But there are many customers who are interested in having a on-premise QPU for various reasons, security, trying to see how the hybrid climate works in their environment, and so on. So certainly we are very excited to see the interest that seems to be emerging with the 9-qubit, and we definitely think it will be a good contributor. to our sales and margins. At the price points I mentioned, we make fairly healthy margins, so we feel pretty comfortable that this will be a good potential revenue stream that could help us with our cash situation. Hopefully that answers your questions.
spk04: Yeah, no, that was great. I guess a couple of follow-ons. First, you mentioned customers, if they're buying the QPU, they have to have their own dilution refrigerator. I know dilution refrigerators are pretty expensive, so I'm assuming that this is just for the QPU. The dilution refrigerator is purchased directly by the customer. That's not included in the sale.
spk01: Yeah, in general. I mean, we can obviously sell them the whole system if they want to, but many customers that we are talking about, as I said, it's primarily for research purposes. They already have purchased a dilution refrigeration system, so no point in trying to sell them the whole thing when they already have it. And We can ship them a finished QPU, if you will, in a FedEx or UPS type box and literally it just has to be plug and play kind of a system where they can immediately attach it to their existing dilution refrigeration system and get it working fairly quickly. So it's a fairly simple operation to ship and get it plugged into their environment and get it going. If they want to buy the whole system from us, including the DR, obviously the price point will be higher, roughly in the 2 to 2.5 in the range for the 9-qubit system. But we are primarily focused on customers who already have a DR and are interested in just buying the QPU from us.
spk04: Got it. And my last question is, you mentioned a 9-qubit QPU and a square lattice, I guess. It sort of begs the natural question, if you're doing a nine-square lattice, is there a roadmap in this QP business to do a 16-square lattice or a 25-qubit or a 36-qubit, et cetera, et cetera, to give QPUs with greater capability to this customer base so that they can do more complex gate circuits? Yes.
spk01: Excellent question. And we debated internally a lot as to the right way to go forward with our roadmap. As we have already described, our ANCA-1 is not a square structure, if you will. It's 84 qubit. But when we say a square lattice, it is the actual structure of the qubit. So ANCA-1 is still a square lattice, just in a 12 by 7 layout, if you will. So when we say square, it is the exact location of the nine qubits and how the squares tie up with each other. Certainly, if we can look at nine going to 60 and going to 81, and that's an approach we debate internally, should we be looking at that versus 84. But at this time, we want to stay with the 84 qubit, 12 by 7 in a square pattern, the tunable coupler. And by the way, that is the more important part, is the tunable coupler more than the square lattice. leads to much higher performance than the fixed couplers that some others are doing in the superconducting qubit camp. And we actually published a blog today getting into the details of why we believe tunable couplers are significantly better than fixed couplers that other companies are trying to do. So I certainly encourage you to take a look at that blog that is on our website right now. So anyway, so our roadmap is get 84 qubit to 98% fidelity, median 2Q fidelity by the end of this year, get it to 99% sometime next year, and then scale up going from 84 to 168 and 336 and so on. But certainly if we can look at square lattice and just go 9, 16, 81 and so on, we are open to that if that makes sense.
spk04: Got it. Thank you.
spk01: Thanks, Gwynn.
spk00: Thank you. Our next question comes from Steven Chen with TD Cowen. Your line is open.
spk02: Hi, thanks for taking my questions. This is Steven calling on behalf of Krish. Actually, some follow-ups as well on the QPU sales. I guess in terms of the associate hardware that you're referring to in terms of the overall QPU sale, I assume some of the computing components control hardware that's associated with the couplers, that's part of the package. And if so, is there any, I guess, follow-on service or maintenance contract revenues that might be associated with this QPU sale, any future ones? And similarly for the ADIA Labs Abu Dhabi partnership, any comments on sort of the revenue profile over a longer-term period and also the profile for that, so?
spk01: So thanks, Stephen, for your questions, good questions. So regarding the QPU sale itself, this is a large national lab that we deal with. So it's certainly they wanted to get a QPU on premise. That's what this sale was about. Leads to exciting opportunities, as I mentioned with Quinn in my previous answer, with other research organizations, national labs, academic institutes, and other organizations. Long term, certainly we think service is a big contributor to the revenue stream when you start selling QPUs because these are going to be complex systems. They will need service support. So definitely expect a service stream to go with the QPU sale long term. I think it's too early to talk about short term because we are dealing with large national labs who have hundreds of researchers on premise on their location. Many of them are quite capable of doing service. And in fact, they want to. core know-how from us, but they want to do their own optimizations and tuning and stuff like that. So we really are not discussing service to this national lifetime customers in the short term, but long-term definitely service is a significant portion of the revenue stream. Your second question was about ADIA Lab and the collaboration we announced. Exciting partnership with ADIA. ADIA is obviously a large organization focused on research on many different things, one of them being the financial areas and, in specific, the time series with the probability distribution functions. These are extremely complex problems, as we mentioned in our press release, to take on with classical computation. They approached us, and they are giving us some money. We haven't disclosed how much. It's, again, small in the big scheme of things. It's more of a strategic partnership that we are excited about. We want to work with them. We want to show them that quantum computing makes a difference. With quantum computing, you get a distinct advantage over classical computing in solving these complex problems. Our goal was really to demonstrate narrow quantum advantage or as close a proximity to narrow quantum advantage as we can for these complex problems. It wasn't really done with a service or with a revenue specifically in mind. Long-term, certainly, ADIA is a fantastic partner to build our partnership with long-term. And we hope the real opportunity comes from the financial vertical market, not just organizations like ADIA. Hopefully, that answers your question.
spk02: It does. Thank you so much for that. And just as my follow-up, regarding the announcement of River Lane, working with your systems for error correction, I guess, can you talk about the longer-term implications of that? Since I know internally you guys are more focused on the gate fidelity, but is River Lane's efforts supplementing any of your own internal error correction development efforts? And are there any expectations that if River Lane makes big progress on the error correction front, whether or not that leads to, you know, opens more doors for additional QPU system sales or additional development contract signings that, you know, with potentially more lab projects. Thanks.
spk01: Yeah, certainly error correction is a very important part of any computing system, even including classical. I mean, we routinely use error corrections in any classical system today. So we definitely expect error correction to be a key component of a quantum computing system long term. Riverlane is an excellent company focused specifically on error correction. We have partnered with them in the past, and definitely we are excited to partner with them right now with the AnkaOne system. We are working on, in general, error areas ourselves, but certainly that doesn't preclude us from looking at partnerships like with Riverlane and with others, and we are talking to others too. Any advancement, whether we do or they do or in this area, is generally will be received positively by the whole quantum computing community. As I mentioned before, when the fidelities are much lower than 99%, frankly, error correction doesn't make that big a difference. It does make some difference, obviously, but the overall errors are dominated by the intrinsic fidelity of your system. As you increase your fidelity to 98% and 99%, and certainly 99.x% range, error corrections start becoming a big determining factor in your overall performance of the system. And that's really why we have started the partnership early. As we improve our fidelity from our side, they will obviously see the benefit in the final results that they get. So hopefully that answers your question.
spk02: Thank you so much for that, and nice job in the quarter. Thank you. Thank you.
spk00: Thank you. Our next question comes from David Williams with the Benchmark Company. Your line is open.
spk03: Hey, good afternoon. And Subodh, I just wanted to extend my congratulations on your success. You've definitely done, I think, a fantastic job turning things around and putting things back on track. So congratulations on your progress.
spk01: Thank you, David.
spk03: I guess my first question is just around the interest that you're receiving. Just given the success and what you've been able to accomplish in a short order, are you seeing that the interest level from customers has improved? And maybe what you're hearing in terms of feedback from those customers, the maybe pre-arrival, pre-year arrival contracts, and then what you've done since then.
spk01: Well, certainly we are getting more interest from customers as our fidelities continue to increase. When I came in the company, as you know, we were dealing with our Aspen M3 system. We were just about to launch AnkaOne system. And the fidelities were on the lower side with Aspen when we started. We have continued to improve our fidelities. Our customers see that as we approach 98% before the end of this year, we definitely expect the interest to increase. And certainly at 99% plus next year, we definitely expect a lot more customers to be interested in our QPUs. So we see that firsthand right now. I mean, our fidelities are in the mid to high 90s with ANCA 1. We continue to work on it. We are pretty confident with ANCA 2. As we mentioned in our press release, we will be at 98 plus percent range before the end of this year. And that directly correlates with the interest from customers in using our QPUs. So we expect, as we improve our fidelities, the interest from customers to use our quantum computers for service or directly buy from us that will continue to go up. They are definitely correlated. Going forward, certainly we are excited to get the first order and execute on it. So we already sold our first QPU as we disclosed. And that's a huge accomplishment we are proud of what our team has accomplished in making that happen. We are dealing with the pipeline right now as we publish more results as the national lab who is our customer, they publish more results and others see value in this 9 qubit QPU with the tunable couplers and square lattice. We definitely expect more customers to be expressing interest going forward. And we'll continue to increase both the size number of qubits as well as the quality of qubits. So Anka, our 2 chip is 84 qubit. So we are talking to some potential customers about 24 qubit and 84 qubit type systems. That's more in the long term. Near term, certainly, we will continue to talk to more customers on 9 qubit with the square lattice and tunable couplers. But anyway, exciting to see the interest in the global community in using something like this right away. And we are definitely getting a lot of interest on a number of research customers right now.
spk03: Okay. No, that's a great color there. And you mentioned this briefly, but how much interest do you have, I guess, in terms of your latest generation? Are you seeing more interest around kind of that research phase, or do you see others that maybe have more interest in getting something closer to your latest 84-qubit ANCA II potentially at the end of the year? Are you seeing a lot of interest there, and maybe what kind of price point would you be thinking about, and is that something you'd be interested in maybe doing as it's released, is telling that right away?
spk01: Excellent questions. I mean, right now, certainly we are entertaining customers with 9-qubit and maybe 24-qubit type levels. We want to bring our own system up first with good fidelity with 84-qubit, so we definitely want to be our first user ourselves. And that will happen before the end of this year when we have an 84-qubit ANCA II system with 98 plus percent median 2Q fidelity. Beyond that, we will certainly entertain a request. Most customers would want to test it out in a cloud manner as a service first before they want to bring it on-premise. I mean, you can do a lot of good quality research with a 9-qubit tunable coupler system today. As you know, this goes with exponential with a 98 or 99% plus fidelity. A lot of research projects can be handled with even nine qubits because it's really two ways to that number. That is the level of the computational power you're getting. So that's a huge amount of computing power you get even with nine qubits with two-level couplers. Certainly as the number goes up, you are dealing with an exponential power. So we will be happy to entertain customers But it has to make sense for them. I mean, we just don't want to take on projects that are difficult for customers to understand and for us to execute. But we certainly will be talking to customers with higher number of qubits with better fidelity early next year. Hopefully that answers your question.
spk03: Thanks so much. And again, congrats on the progress.
spk01: Thank you.
spk00: Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I'll turn the call over to Sabat for any closing remarks.
spk01: Thank you for your interest and your questions. We look forward to updating you with our progress next quarter. Thank you again.
spk00: Thank you for your participation. This does conclude the program and you may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Disclaimer