Rigetti Computing, Inc.

Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Regetti Computing second quarter 2026 financial results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 11 on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 11 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Subodh Kulkarni, CEO of Rigetti. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us for Rigetti's second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. I'm pleased to be joined today by our Chief Financial Officer, Jeff Bertelsen, who will walk you through our financial results in more detail following my overview. We appreciate your continued interest in RIGATI and look forward to answering your questions and the conclusion of our prepared remarks. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that today's call, along with our second quarter 2026 press release, contains forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current expectations, objectives, and underlying assumptions regarding our outlook and future operating results and are subject to risks and uncertainties These risks and uncertainties are described in more detail in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, our Form 10-Q filing for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, and other periodic reports filed from time to time with the SEC. Thank you. Thank you. furnished with the SEC. Before I dive into the quarter, I want to frame our discussion around three key takeaways. First, we continue to demonstrate technical leadership with our CFIUS class systems, including ongoing progress to improve the performance of our 108Q, CFIUS 1-108Q platform. Second, the letter of intent we signed with the US Department of Commerce for up to $100 million in funding over three years further validates our superconducting chiplet-based approach and strengthens our ability to invest against our roadmap to quantum advantage. Third, we recently announced an expanded collaboration with HPE and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center to develop a hybrid quantum classical supercomputer, reflecting growing demand for our approach and positioning Rigetti to deliver differentiated quantum enhanced and HPC Solutions. Q2 was another important proof point in our strategy to combine technical progress with real-world access and long-term strategic partnerships. Quantum computing remains a long-cycle opportunity, but we are increasingly seeing the ecosystem coalesce around platforms that can scale in a practical way and that are available to users where they already run their workloads. We believe Rigetti's well-positioned environment for three reasons. We are focused on superconducting gate-based quantum computing, which offers a combination of scalability and speed that is difficult to replicate with other modalities. We are pursuing an open modular architecture that allows us to integrate innovative solutions from partners to advance our technology faster, such as QVC technology from Riverlane and transduction technology from QFox. We pioneered and continue to lead in chiplet-based architectures, which we believe provide a more practical path to scaling to 1,000 qubits and beyond than monolithic approaches. Let me start with our technology and product progress. CPS-1108Q remains one of the highest qubit count generally available gate-based quantum computers in the world and the largest modular quantum computing system on the market today. The system is built from 12 interconnected 9-qubit chiplets and is accessible to customers via Brigetti Quantum Cloud Services and through Amazon Bracket, Microsoft Azure Quantum, and CubeBraid. We are just one of three companies, including IBM and Google, who have delivered gate-based systems with over 100 qubits, and we believe that our modular approach gives us a strong advantage on the path towards higher qubit count systems. Today, CFIUS-1108Q continues to operate at a median single qubit gate fidelity of approximately 99.9% and a median two qubit gate fidelity of roughly 99.1% with gate speeds around 60 nanoseconds. These performance levels at the 100 plus qubit scale are meaningful, and our teams remain focused on improving fidelity throughout 2026 as we refine chip design materials and fabrication processes and incorporate learnings from our R&D platforms. From a systems engineering perspective, our work this quarter extended beyond adding qubits. We continue to mitigate coupling interactions between tunable couplers that become more pronounced beyond the 100 qubit scale and to address coherence time limitations that are now the primary constraint on fidelity. As we discussed with investors in May, our current coherence times are in the 25 to 30 microsecond range, and we are executing on a set of chip design and material initiatives intended to roughly double or triple those times over the next several years. This includes joint IP with Fermilab, where capping niobium superconducting contacts with tantalum has demonstrated meaningful coherence time improvements in fundamental experiments and we are now incorporating those learnings into production chip designs. We are also refining deposition, oxidation and edge processes to smooth interfaces in the Josephson junction area, which we believe will further improve coherence and ultimately gate fidelities. Beyond CFIUS-1-108Q, we remain on track with the chiplet-based roadmap we laid out earlier this year. and have begun investing in dilution refrigeration and infrastructure that can support 1,000 qubit systems. Our objective remains to reach approximately 1,000 qubits, two qubit gate fidelities of 99.9% and gate speeds below 40 nanoseconds in roughly three years. I would now like to spend a few minutes on the US Department of Commerce letter of intent we announced on May 21. Under this LOI, The department has selected Rigetti for a potential award of up to $100 million in funding over three years to accelerate superconducting quantum computing R&D that addresses key technical challenges in scaling and advancing our systems. The contemplated transaction structure includes a department receiving an equity stake in IGATI consistent with the total amount of funding, and the funding itself would be allocated under the CHIPS Research and Development Office broad agency announcement pursuant to the CHIPS Act. We believe that this prospective partnership reflects the view that quantum computing will have far-reaching impacts on national security, economic interests, and overall prosperity. and that superconducting qubit platforms are central to US leadership in this field. It also reflects the administration's broader CHIPS R&D investments in quantum computing and related technologies designed to build domestic industry, create high paying jobs and strengthen technological resilience. For Rigetti, this LOI is strategically significant in several ways. It would allow us to tackle key scaling bottlenecks more rapidly associated with multi-chip architectures. It would enable us to accelerate multiple generations of superconducting quantum processors and associated control electronics at FAB1, our dedicated quantum device manufacturing facility. It would deepen our collaboration with the US government at a time when global investment in quantum computing is increasing and geopolitical competition in this domain is intensifying. It is important to emphasize that the LOI is not yet a definitive agreement. Any final structure will also include issuance of securities to the department and will be subject to customary approvals and conditions. We view this prospective partnership as aligned with our long-term strategy and our commitment to disciplined capital deployment. Jeff will provide additional context on how we are thinking about this funding opportunity within our broader capital framework. Turning to Customer Momentum and Market Traction. Our strategy is to meet customers where they are, across public cloud, hybrid infrastructure, and dedicated quantum systems. On the cloud, Rigetti Quantum Cloud Services, Amazon Bracket, Microsoft Azure Quantum, and Q-Braid provide global access to our systems, including CFIUS-1108-Q. We continue to see engagement from researchers and enterprises seeking to experiment on one of the most capable generally available gate-based platforms where they benefit from ease of use and consistent uptime. In parallel, we are building a growing base of on-premises system deployments. Earlier this year, we outlined three systems targeted for delivery in 2026. Two 9-qubit Novera systems and a 108-qubit system for CDAC in India. We remain on track and are seeing additional demand for Nowhere RQPUs from national labs and universities with recent wins including the University of Saskatchewan and a research arm of a large Japanese conglomerate. These deployments deepen technical engagement, create multi-year usage pathways and generate high value feedback that informs our roadmap. At this stage of the market, we are prioritizing customers committed to active experimentation and collaboration and we are deliberate in how we build those relationships. As part of this customer momentum, we recently expanded our collaboration with HPE and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center. Rigetti will deliver a nine-qubit Novara quantum computing system into PSC's new Tangle Lab testbed, which is being funded by a National Science Foundation grant. Working with HPE, this deployment is designed to integrate the Novara system with an HPE powered supercomputing environment so that researchers and industry users can develop and test hybrid quantum classical workloads on real hardware. We view this as an important step in moving our HPE relationship from only experimentation toward commercially relevant quantum enabled HPC solutions. More broadly, global investment in quantum computing continues to expand led by governments and national labs and increasingly complemented by commercial interest. Outside the United States, we are seeing structured programs such as the UK government's six-year PROCURE initiative, where we intend to invest up to $100 million over time in systems, talent, and infrastructure. In India, our 108-qubit CDAC award reflects national-level interest in superconducting platforms. And across Europe and Asia, We are seeing a growing number of coordinated quantum initiatives. Commercial revenue remains early, but engagement is increasing across industries such as materials, logistics, and financial services as they explore hybrid and quantum-inspired workloads. As system performance improves and the industry moves closer to quantum advantage, we expect commercial adoption to build on the government and research foundation in place today. Let me briefly connect these developments back to our long-term roadmap. We remain focused on a clear sequence of models designed to position Rigetti to reach quantum advantage in roughly three years. Near-term, that means driving CFIUS 1100Q toward a median two-qubit gate fidelity of approximately 99.5% later this year, while maintaining our gate speed advantages. Beyond that, We are working toward deploying higher qubit systems that leverage our chiplet-based architecture as the foundation for scaling beyond 1,000 qubits with fidelities and speed mitigated and eventually fault-tolerant computation. In support of this roadmap, we continue to invest in FAB1 and associated refrigeration infrastructure, as well as partnerships with organizations such as Riverlane, Quanta, and QFOX to integrate innovative solutions into the stack. The prospective CHIPS Act funding would further reinforce our ability to execute on multiple generations of processors while maintaining prudent capital discipline. We intend to update our published technology roadmap later this year once we have additional operational data from CPS108Q and clearer visibility into subsequent system deployments. Our objective is to provide investors with a transparent view of the milestones that matter most for quantum advantage, including specific targets for qubit count, fidelity, coherence time, and gauge speed. With that overview, I will now turn the call over to our CFO, Jeff Bertelsen, to discuss our financial results and capital deployment in more detail.

Thank you, Subodh, and good afternoon, everyone. I will spend a few minutes walking through our second quarter 2026 financial results, our balance sheet and liquidity, and how we're thinking about capital deployment as we continue to execute on the roadmap Subodh described, including the potential implications of the Department of Commerce LOI. For the second quarter of 2026, revenue was approximately $5.1 million compared to $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2025. The year-over-year increase was driven by on-premises Novera QPU sales, reflecting recognition of previously announced Novera purchase orders. Gross margin for the quarter was approximately 43%, compared to 31% in the second quarter of 2025, with variability driven by contract mix-in pricing and the relative contribution from Novera QPU sales. Total operating expenses for the second quarter were $30.3 million, compared to $20.4 million in the same period last year with spending concentrated in research and development including engineering headcount, fabrication, chip design, and control electronics development as well as investments in refrigeration and infrastructure to support higher cubic count systems. Stock-based compensation for the quarter was approximately $7 million compared to $3.6 million in the second quarter of 2025. operating loss was $28.1 million compared to $19.9 million in the prior year period. On a GAAP basis, net loss for the quarter was $52.6 million compared to a net loss of $39.7 million in the prior year period, with results again impacted by non-cash fair value adjustments to derivative warrant and earn-out liabilities. As we have said previously, These fair value adjustments can introduce significant quarter-to-quarter volatility into our GAAP results and do not affect how we operate the business or allocate capital. On a non-GAAP basis, which excludes stock-based compensation and fair value adjustments to warrant and earn out liabilities, net loss for the quarter was approximately $16 million or $0.05 per diluted share, compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $13.3 million or $0.04 per diluted share in the second quarter of 2025. Let me provide a bit more color on revenue drivers and how we're thinking about the remainder of the year. As we discussed on our prior call, we expected strong year-over-year revenue growth in the first half of 2026, driven by the previously announced NOVERA purchase orders we received late last year and earlier in 2026. In Q2, we continued to progress on the $8.4 million CDAC order for an on-premises 108-qubit system in India, which we still expect to recognize in the fourth quarter of this year following installation and performance acceptance testing. More broadly, our revenue profile continues to be influenced by the timing of system deliveries and government-funded projects. We view this variability as inherent to the current stage of the quantum computing market and not as a driver of our long-term capital allocation or technology strategy. Turning to the balance sheet, we ended the second quarter of 2026 with approximately $541.3 million in cash, cash equivalents and available for sale investments, compared with $569 million as of March 31, 2026, and $589.8 million as of December 31, 2025. We continue to operate with no debt and given our current operating profile, we believe our capital position provides sufficient runway to execute against our technology and system deployment milestones, including continued progress on scale, fidelity, system integration and our planned investment in the United Kingdom. Capital expenditures in the quarter were primarily driven by investments in FAB I and additional dilution refrigeration capacity to support higher tube account systems. As we noted previously, we expect 2026 CapEx to be elevated relative to prior years, largely due to investments in dilution refrigeration and FAB equipment. Our approach to capital deployment remains disciplined and consistent with what we have discussed on prior calls. The majority of our spending is directed toward core R&D activities that directly advance our technology platform, including our chiplet-based architecture, control systems, and cloud integration. We are not managing the business around short-term revenue optimization. We are managing it around credible long-term progress toward quantum advantage and commercially relevant systems. Should we move from the current LOI to definitive agreements with the Department of Commerce, we would expect the CHIPS Act's funding to be deployed in a way that is tightly aligned with this philosophy. That means focusing the capital on specific technical programs that address scaling bottlenecks and packaging and enhancements while being mindful of potential dilution associated with any equity issuance. To close, our financial strategy is unchanged from what we outlined last quarter. We are focused on maintaining flexibility, funding innovation responsibly, and aligning capital deployment with the long-term value creation of our technology roadmap, including the CHIPS Act funding. Quarterly results will continue to reflect the early stage nature of the quantum computing market and the timing of large system contracts. but we believe our balance sheet and capital discipline position us to execute with patience and control. With that, I will turn it back to Subodh for closing remarks before we open the call for questions.

Thank you, Jeff. We are encouraged by the progress we are making on our technology roadmap, the strengthening engagement we are seeing from customers across cloud and on-premises channels, and the strategic support we are beginning to see from governments such as the United States and the United Kingdom. We remain focused on delivering against the milestones we have laid out, including fidelity improvements on CPS1-108Q, higher qubit systems, and disciplined execution of our capital plan. On behalf of the entire Regati team, thank you for your continued interest and support. Operator, we are now ready to open the call for questions.

Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star 11 again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. And our first question comes from Brian Kinslinger of Alliance Global Partners. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. On the last conference call, you highlighted coherence time as the primary limitation on your new architecture to fidelity and that you believed you could address that challenge. Then you gave some details around that today. When is a reasonable timeframe where we can expect to see that impact fidelity?

Thanks, Brian, for the call. Indeed, as we discussed in the call, coherence time is the limiting factor for two-qubit gate fidelity at this time, and that's why we are so focused on improving coherence time. Right now, it's in the 25 to 30 microseconds range. We want to obviously bump it up as much as possible, but we think a factor of two or three improvement is practical in the near term, and that's what we are working on. The kind of stuff we are working on we disclosed during the call, things like smoother interfaces at the Josephson junction level, or capping off the Niobium-Betantalum, which seems to improve the coherence time, and we have published some papers along those lines. Those are the kinds of things we are doing. We definitely expect fidelity to increase at the 108-qubit level before the end of this year, and we'll update everyone when we are ready to deploy a new system. I just want to put the developments in a little perspective here. Keep in mind that there are only three very capable, more than 100-qubit systems in the gate-based world in quantum computing right now. Decisors is IBM at 120 qubits, VR at 108, and Google is at 105 qubit. Everyone else, even though they may be talking a lot about roadmaps and future, are well below that. And many companies are well below 50 qubits when it comes to actual systems. We get incredible feedback from end users who are using our systems every day that our system is one of the easiest to use and has consisted of time. So we want to be careful that before we upgrade our system, if you will, with higher coherence time and higher fidelity. We have checked off all the other metrics, and we don't inadvertently go backwards in the technical progress. So we are careful with how we are doing the experiments and how we will deploy it in the actual system that is deployed for the whole world. Hopefully that answers your question.

Guys, if I can just ask one follow-up. A few months back, there was a change in the leadership in DARPA's QBI. Has this had any impact on Rigetti's Chances of getting to Stage B, and do you think this is still achievable by year end? Thanks for taking my question.

Certainly, there was a change in leadership at DARPA. Our plan stays the same. DARPA gave us a bunch of areas where they wanted to see improvements to get into Phase B. We continue to work with them. We have periodic calls with them and meetings with them. and we will continue to demonstrate improvements in the areas that were pointed out. We still feel optimistic that we will get into DARPA phase B relatively soon. It's impossible to predict the exact timelines on all these kinds of things but we continue to make very good progress and we continue to believe we will get into phase B soon. Along with DARPA, there are other initiatives as I mentioned in my call. There is a UK government's Procure initiative which is kind of like the DARPA QBI initiative and some other initiatives across the world. So we are engaged in multiple initiatives like that so it's not just DARPA alone. And as you saw, the Department of Commerce in the U.S. created a separate initiative focused on accelerating roadmaps and we are definitely part of that. So DARPA is and will continue to be an important player in the quantum computing ecosystem but it's not the only one. There are multiple areas that we are participating in right now.

Great. Thanks, everyone. Thank you, Brian.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Chris Sankar of TDTown. Your line is open.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Subodh, just a first question on the current lab facility in Fremont. The current tooling and your, what's the annual QPU production capacity, and what kind of CAPEX requirements should we expect for that?

So Krish, right now the fab one we have in Fremont is a 150 millimeter fab. Frankly capacity is not a concern at all. We have plenty of capacity in that fab with 150 millimeters because each quantum chip is capable of significant computation as you're aware. So we make a number of nine qubit chips right now and with our chiplet architecture we are using nine qubit chiplets to and many more. In the future, we believe we will make things like 36-qubit chiplets that will take us to 1,000 qubits and beyond, and we will continue to increase the size of the chiplets in the future. Right now, I mean, to give you a reference, the 9-qubit chiplet is roughly 6 millimeter by 6 millimeter, so as you can imagine, we can build plenty of 9-qubit chiplets in a single 150-millimeter wafer, and we can print number of wafers a day. So the capacity is not an issue at all. Challenge, of course, is getting the capability out there. And there are some limitations with 150 millimeter equipment, and it's not an automated line. And we believe there are some limitations that come with non-automated line and 150 millimeter size. So we continue to look at alternative options for upgrading the FAB, but it's mostly for capability, not for capacity.

That's a very helpful support. Another follow up on the HPE chip for the 9Q with Navera QPU system. Will you be providing just QPU chips only? Or will it be QPU plus dilution fridge controls and other infrastructure? And what is kind of like the timing for delivery on that?

So, yeah, it's a good question. And we are really excited to partner with HPE and Crispr Supercomputing Center. It's really a great initiative. to demonstrate how hybrid computing works. If you go out there right now, a lot of people talk about hybrid computing, but honestly, there are very, very few places, in fact, hardly any where you can go and actually do demonstrate hybrid computing and how it's supposed to work. So we believe we will be one of the first ones to do that along with HPE. Our contribution to that NSF-sponsored project is a full nine-qubit system. so not just the QPU but the QPU plus traditional refrigeration plus control system and everything. Obviously HPE is a top player in the HPC world so HPE's contribution is HPC and the interfaces is what we will be working on and that's really the role of Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center. So it's going to be an exciting project to bring in the best of HPCs, the best of quantum computing and allow access to anyone in the world so that they can easily play around with hybrid computing and see how hybrid computing works. In particular, I will bring forth that because we are using superconducting gate technology, we have a huge benefit in terms of speed. Our gate speeds are in the 50, 60 nanosecond range, which are roughly 1,000 to 10,000 times faster than trapped ion or atoms or other modalities. and that really will shine and will come forward when we show the data coming out of hybrid computing because clearly a trapped ion or an atom-based quantum computer with its very, very slow speed will have a tough time keeping up with CPU and GPU. And you can see that in some of the results being discussed when they talk about hybrid computing. Whereas with superconducting computing, you will really see the benefit of speed and how I think speed helps in the overall computation and coming to the correct answer much, much faster than with other modalities. So we are pretty excited about this partnership opportunity and demonstrating how hybrid computing will work, particularly with superconducting.

Maybe just to follow up on that with Jeff, sorry. Last question, timing of delivery and how to think about rev rec for this.

Yeah, so we believe the delivery will be sometime in 2027. We don't know the exact quarter yet. The program just got kicked off recently. As we find out, we will be transparent about the timelines. But at this point, it definitely will be a 2027 delivery. We'll let you know once we know exactly when it will happen.

Thanks a lot, Subodh. Appreciate it.

Thank you, Krish.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Troy Jensen of Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is open.

Hey, gentlemen. Congrats on the continued progress here. Maybe a quick question to start with Subodh here. Just any thoughts on the executive order and has there been any change in kind of government activity post, you know, signing of that order? You know, I'm wondering if it's mainly, you know, security more or just system level, but I'd just love to get your thoughts on if anything's changed since then.

Sure. Thanks, Troy. So indeed, with the executive order passed by the president, there has been increased emphasis on quantum computing. A number of initiatives have started because of those executive orders. I would say they are still generally in the early stages, but you are already seeing some of them. The Department of Commerce initiated using the CHIPS Act certainly is one of those. We definitely expect More funding coming into the overall quantum computing ecosystem from the US government because of those executive orders. There are various bills that are being debated as we speak, whether it's the NQID authorization bill that funds the Department of Energy Labs, or the NDAA, which funds the Department of Water, and there are many line items included in that for quantum computing. So overall, I would say definitely the executive orders highlighted the importance of quantum computing for national security and strategic reasons. It is definitely helping free up funding in quantum computing. You are already seeing that a little bit in the Department of Commerce, but definitely expect more of those kinds of things from both from Department of Energy as well as Department of Law.

All right, makes sense. And then just another one for you maybe. Congrats on the HPE announcement. I think that's huge. Obviously, you're close to them and Quanta. I guess I would assume there's tons of good data center partnerships that you guys could have. Is HPE as much on the networking side or is that on the server side? But just any more kind of details on that would be wonderful.

Certainly, we are excited to partner with HPE. They are, as I mentioned, the top player in the world of HPCs. The partnership will certainly evolve as we get into demonstration and what else can we do. It's not an exclusive partnership. We are certainly going to be talking to other HPC players and certainly HPE will be talking with other modalities and other quantum computing companies too. I think the exciting part for both of us is truly bring a state-of-the-art HPC with a state-of-the-art quantum computer and see how exactly we do the and many others. So certainly a lot of applications we will be able to take on with that kind of a setup and show really how quantum computing helps reduce the overall Thank you. Thank you.

And our next question comes from John McPeak of Rosenblatt Securities. Your line is open.

Great. Can you hear me, guys?

Yes, we can, John.

Excellent. Subodh and Jeff, congrats on the execution here. Steady progress. Actually, I have a couple for Jeff. You talked about CapEx. I got that. That was one of my questions. But deferred revenues ticked up more than in any quarter I've seen in the history of and you actually had your largest billings quarter if you just look at the change in deferreds and revenues. Could you talk a little bit about what that's about, if anything?

Sure. Sure. That mainly relates to CDAC. With that order, there were some prepayments and so forth that added to deferred revenue. So that was the main driver there.

Okay, that makes sense. And then one for Subodh. I've heard compliments about your QPUs from some optical interconnect companies. I'm curious if you've had any discussions with respect to with your open architecture, potentially at least doing some exploratory work on optical interconnect of your and Novera QPUs.

Thanks, John, for telling us that you hear good things about us from optical interconnect companies. Indeed, we are very proud of the fact that our QPUs are some of the best QPUs, if not the best QPUs out there. And we consistently hear that from end users who use our QPUs. They keep telling us that they are extremely reliable, consistent, very easy to use. So it's not a surprise, but it's always good to hear from third parties. We talked to multiple optical players, the publicly disclosed partnerships. Among the publicly disclosed partnerships, we have mentioned QFOX, where we are working with them on transduction. That's basically converting microwave signals to optical signals and vice versa. The reason that area is important is because right now, our 9-qubit or even our 108-qubit system does not use any optical signaling. We are basically relying on coax signaling. And that will continue for a while. We plan to use flex cable technology to get to 1,000 qubits. But beyond 1,000, certainly when we start talking 10,000 and 100,000 qubits, we cannot rely on flex cables and certainly not coax cables. And that's really where optical signaling comes in. And so the early research work is what we are doing right now with companies like QFOX, understanding how to convert microwave signal to optical and reverse that without losing fidelity or any other issues. It all shows promising results right now, but I would caution it's still early research before all of that can be converted into roadmap and definitive timelines. We still have some work to do. But it's encouraging to see that optical signal is going to work out. and that allows us to get to the tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of qubits.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Quinn Bolton of Needham & Company. Your line is open.

Hey, this is Shadi Mewali for Quinn. Thanks for taking our questions. Now that you have your 108 qubit system up and running in the cloud, Can you just talk about what you guys are seeing in regard to user engagement? And then I'll have a follow-up.

Thanks for that question. As I mentioned in my comments earlier, we are getting excellent feedback from end users who are using our 108-qubit system. They're consistently hearing it's one of the best systems out there. And again, to remind everyone, there's only three more than 100-qubit systems out there in the world, IBM at 120, Qubit, we at 108, and Google at 105. Everyone else is well below that, and most of the players that talk are well below 50 qubits. So really we are in the top, we are in the second place right now as far as quantum computing capability is concerned. We get excellent feedback, customers who have used it and thousands of customers are using it through AWS and Azure as well as other cloud platforms. And we consistently hear our system is one of the easiest to use. It's always up and running, the results are consistent, reliable. So we are really happy to hear that kind of feedback. Most of the work that they are still doing is very much research kind of work. We acknowledge openly that we are not quite close to quantum advantage. We need to get to, as we have mentioned in the past, closer to 1,000 physical qubits, closer to 99.9% two-qubit gate fidelity, along with some error mitigation or correction before we can start talking tactical work or applications and demonstrating value with that. So we fully understand that we are building systems right now for research applications. That's exactly what we see customers are doing. They're trying to understand how to design algorithms, how to fundamentally look at quantum computing, how it fits in their ecosystem. But overall, I would say we are very pleased with the feedback we are getting from end users who have been using our 108 qubit system for a while now.

Got it. That's great to hear. and then on the $100 million LOI, it sounds like this will likely be a milestone or technical base. So can you just talk about what Rigetti would need to prove to unlock all the funding?

Yeah, good question. We are still, the agreement is not definitive yet, so we are still discussing with Commerce Department on what exactly is expected when to get the $100 million. Broad-based, we know the areas we are working on. We are working on things like cryogenics. We are working on things like miniaturization of electronics in the readout chain, those kinds of things. So we know at a high level. And basically, it's accelerating our roadmap. The overall goal of this $100 million is to accelerate our roadmap. And that's exactly what we are working on. We are defining exactly what our roadmap is and which milestones can be accelerated. So it's still a work in progress. Hopefully it becomes a definitive agreement soon and then we can disclose in more detail what and when we plan to do.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Tyler Anderson of Craig Hallam. Your line is open.

Hi, gentlemen. Thank you for taking my questions. This is Tyler Anderson on for Richard Shannon. So just to start, for a very quick question, For the HPE and PSE deployment, is this still fridge and control unit yours, or is this going to be a third party's?

It's ours, Tyler. Basically, it's a full system that we build. We obviously are outsourcing parts of the system, so we are buying dilution refrigerators from vendors. Obviously, we are partnered with Quanta for control system and so on, so we will use and other third-party components, but the overall system is designed and built by us.

Okay, that's very interesting with the quanta. And then getting into what's getting your coherence time up or what you are doing to do that. So the neobium caps you had previously done before and I'm just wondering was integrating all of these technologies are required to get you to the fidelities that you were aiming for originally? Or is this something that you've kind of held in your back pocket and you've been deploying these benefits as you need them to increase the coherence time? And then I have a quick follow-up.

As you can imagine, Tyler, when you're doing advanced R&D on these kinds of complicated systems, you never hold anything in your back pocket. Do the best you can and try to put it together and see how the systems are working. We have been working with Fermilab on the capping of niobium specifically with tantalum and those results show very good promise. There are various reasons why we have not quite deployed it in the system that is available for everyone today. We definitely plan to include that. But as I mentioned earlier, we have to be careful. We don't just throw everything and then turn it on and deploy it right away. Right now, the system is working very, very well right now. And so before we upgrade the system that is on the cloud right now, we want to test it exhaustively, make sure everything is good. We have not sacrificed something inadvertently in the process. So that's the kind of testing we are doing. We are just being deliberate with every testing. so we don't change something and inadvertently find out that we have deteriorated something else in the process. Hope that answers your question.

That does, and that totally makes sense doing things one at a time and seeing what the impact is. And with that, you know, if we implement all of these things, we start to see a really good impact to the coherence time. You know, these adiabatic gates seem to be doing you pretty well with the fidelity increases with the 36-qubit QPU. Is this something that could potentially accelerate the roadmap if everything else goes well plus adiabatic gates?

Yes, certainly adiabatic gates, and we published a white paper on it last year. We definitely see a lot of promise with that. That definitely is a technology we plan to deploy. We are using a version of that right now in our 108-qubit system, but not the full thing that we disclosed in our white paper. There are, again, reasons for doing that. Definitely work is going on in that area, and we definitely plan to include adiabatic CZ gauge as part of our roadmap for future systems.

Thank you for the time. I appreciate it.

Thank you, Tyler.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Gary Mobley of Stonex Group. Your line is open.

Hi, gentlemen. Thanks for taking my question. I know in the past you've done some work for the UK's NQCC and I believe that was at one point a substantial portion of your revenue. What's the prospect for renewal of the funding for that work and potentially some sort of re-engagement there looking forward?

Thanks for that question, Gary. That's a really good segue into the UK's overall Deployment of Quantum Ecosystem. If you notice, the UK government has announced a multi-year initiative that they call Procure. It's kind of like DARPA QBI, but a little different in the way the UK government is defining the milestones. The end goal is roughly similar. Both of this DARPA QBI as well as the UK Procure are targeting fault-tolerant quantum computing system in roughly six to seven years. The path to get there is a little different for the two programs, but both have merits about why they are doing what they are doing. We are definitely involved with the UK government in those kinds of discussions. Our system is at NQCC right now. Again, it's a 36-gigabit system over there right now, one of the best systems that they have ever seen, so we get very good Thank you for that color.

When you examine your pipeline of potential deals, how does it compare today versus a year ago or any other recent point in time? And where does that money trail lead back to? And what I mean by that is it disproportionately skewed to commercial experimentation, government-backed funding, university research grant funding, or PQC funding?

Well, we definitely see a lot more interest today in quantum computing than a year ago or certainly two years ago. But the interest is coming from all the different areas. Certainly, governments are getting a lot more interested, as you can see from the U.S. government side, things like the Commerce Initiative and continued discussion on the NQI or NDAA, the recent NSF award we got for with HPE to do the hybrid computing. So you are already seeing the US government being a lot more active today than what it was a year or two years ago in quantum computing. I just mentioned the UK government and the big initiative they have with Procure. You saw from our announcement what's happening in the country of India and their government and how they are going about it. But you see across Europe and many other countries in Asia, just about every major economy, have a quantum mission or something like a quantum mission. Many governments have freed up funding, and certainly they want to be part of at least a leader or the leader in the quantum ecosystem. So a lot of activities happening at the government level, and certainly that leads to universities. A lot of advanced universities are getting more and more active in quantum computing. I mean, there are historical places like Yale University or MIT or Princeton's of the world were already there. But now you see broader swath of universities getting involved. I mean, you saw us announcing with Montana State University and University of Saskatchewan and those kinds of places. And you'll see more and more universities in this. What is exciting is actually the commercial companies getting more and more interested in quantum computing right now. If you notice, our first two nine-qubit systems that we delivered this year were both to commercial organizations. Now they're not buying quantum computers on premise to do for their data centers to do any practical work. They fully understand these are research systems. But there's enough interest in understanding the basics of quantum computing that we are seeing increased commercial traction now in addition to the government and university area. And that's where you're seeing sales growth coming far. Our first half of sales growth is primarily driven by commercial organizations buying on-premise quantum computing systems. So we definitely see that increasing. That wasn't there at all a year or certainly two years ago. So that's an exciting development to watch. But overall, we see huge interest in quantum computing across the entire spectrum, government, universities, and commercial. The commercial one is a new one. Pretty exciting to see. Thank you. Thank you, Gary.

Thank you. And as a reminder, if you do have a question, please press star 1-1. One moment for our next question. And our next question comes from Neha Chokshi of Northland Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Yes. Hi. Thank you. It looks like the 36-cubic median cubic gate facility did improve from 99.5% in the first quarter and 99.6% in the second quarter. I may have missed this, but could you just say what was the driver of that improvement?

Yeah, thanks for the question, Nehal. We continue to work on fidelity just about every day, as you can imagine. There are multiple things we have done in the background to improve our 9-qubit and 36-qubit along with the 108-qubit fidelity. A lot of it goes into the, in the broad sense, We do change the design of the qubit, we change FAB processes along with it, and sometimes even the materials that are used in the FAB like the tantalum discussion we had earlier. Most of that improvement, at the nine qubit level we are at 99.8% two qubit grade fidelity, and at 36 qubit, you are right, we have improved it to 99.6% median two qubit grade fidelity. Most of that improvement came from design optimization. It's how the lines are designed and the coupling of the lines with the qubit. That's where we are seeing some of the improvements right now. Certainly, we are incorporating those learnings and will continue to do more work to get all that learning incorporated into the 108 qubit systems and in future larger systems.

Yeah, so to be clear, the improvements that were implemented to drive that improvement in the 36-qubit system has not been applied to the 108-qubit system yet, or it's in flight at this point in time to see if those changes also result in an improvement to the 108-qubit system.

In general, you're right. I mean, we are, as I mentioned earlier, being deliberate that we don't turn too many knobs at the same time and inadvertently hurt the performance. Right now, there are many users who are using our 108-qubit system every day. Obviously, we don't want to tinker around while they're using the system and cause some inadvertent problems. So we are working on and other 108-qubit systems, independent of the one that is deployed in the cloud. And that's where we are beginning to incorporate the learnings from 9-qubit and 36-qubit systems.

Thank you.

Thank you, Neha.

Thank you. I show no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn it back to Subodh Kulkarni for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. We are encouraged by our progress in the second quarter and remain focused on executing against our strategic priorities as we advance Rigetti's position in the quantum computing ecosystem. In the coming months, we will be out meeting with investors at a number of conferences and related events, and we hope to see you there. Thank you for your continued interest in Rigetti.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating, and you may now disconnect.