Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Greetings and

welcome to RYGUE Pharmaceutical's financial conference call for the third quarter 2024. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce our first speaker, Ray Fury, RYGUE's executive vice president, general counsel, and corporate secretary. Thank you, Mr. Fury. You may begin.

Hello, welcome to our third quarter 2024 financial results and business update conference call. The financial press release for the third quarter 2024 was issued a short while ago and can be viewed along with the slides for this presentation in the news and events section of our investor relations site on rygue.com. As a reminder, during today's call, we may make forward-looking statements regarding our financial outlook and our plans and timing for regulatory product development. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ in those forecasted. A description of these risks can be found in our most recent annual report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31st, 2023, and subsequent findings with the SEC, including our Q3 quarterly report on Form 10Q on file with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements are made only as of today's date, and we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to our president and chief executive officer, Raul Rodriguez. Raul.

Thank you, Ray, and thank you everyone for joining today. Also with me today are Dave Santos, our chief commercial officer, Lisa Roycare, our chief medical officer, and Dean Sharnow, our chief financial officer. I will begin on slide four with an overview of Rigel's business in our third quarter results. In the first three quarters of the year, we made significant progress in our strategy to grow our hematology and oncology business. Our corporate strategy is focused on three main objectives. One, expanding our commercial portfolio and increasing product sales. Two, advancing and growing our pipeline through strategic collaborations, and importantly, internal pipeline development. And three, maintaining financial discipline. I will now summarize each of these. Firstly, in the third quarter, we generated strong growth across our commercial portfolio with a total net sales of 38.9 million. This was up 44% compared to the third quarter of 2023. This robust revenue growth was driven by the addition of Gavretto, which generated 7.1 million in net product sales for its first full quarter as we transitioned the majority of patients and prescribers into our network. In addition, we saw continued year over year growth for Tavalis and Resilidia, with both achieving another record quarter for bottle shift to patients and clinics. We continue to expand our product presence outside the US as well this quarter with a new Kisei agreement to develop and commercialize Resilidia in Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan. This agreement included a 10 million upfront dollar payment that we received in Q3, and the potential for up to 152 million in future development, regulatory, and commercial milestone payments. Secondly, regarding our objective to grow our pipeline, we continue to advance the development of R289, our dual IRAC-1 and 4 inhibitor, in a phase 1B study in lower risk MDS. Initial safety and efficacy data from that trial was published in an ASH abstract earlier this week, and we look forward to sharing additional data from a more recent data cut at the ASH meeting in December. Also at ASH, we'll have additional data for Oludicidinib. Our strategic collaborations with MD Anderson and Connect are progressing well. These trials provide us with the opportunity to explore Resilidia in a broad range of IDH1 mutant cancers in a cost and time efficient manner. Our first trial with MD Anderson, evaluating Resilidia in a combination with two other agents in patients with mutant IDH1 AML, enrolled its first patient in September. And as we did with the Resilidia and Gravitor earlier this year, we continue to evaluate opportunities to in-license or acquire late stage hematology and or oncology assets to further expand our portfolio. In 2025, we will discuss our development plans for both R289 in lower risk MDS and Oludicidinib Lastly, as we execute on our strategy to grow our business, we're doing so in a financially disciplined manner. Our strong commercial execution and cost-effective approach to clinical development has enabled us for the first time to generate positive third quarter and year to date net income. In summary, in the third quarter, we made significant progress in growing our business while achieving net income breakeven. We are well positioned to continue to drive value as we head into 2025. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Dave to provide a commercial update. Dave.

Thank you, Raul. We are very pleased with the strong growth in revenues in Q3. Moving to slide six, you see how our quarterly and annual sales have evolved since 2021. We have grown each quarter sales over the previous year, and that growth continues, particularly from last year to this year. We started the first quarter of 2023 with $23.8 million and are now reporting $38.9 million in the third quarter of 2024. That's an incremental 15.1 million, representing 63% growth in quarterly revenue over seven quarters. That growth has been driven by our strong commercial execution in consistently building quarterly demand for Tava Lease and driving broader awareness of ResLydia through the first two years of its launch. The addition of Gavretto and our ability to successfully transition it to our portfolio has also significantly expanded our top line. Compared to the third quarter of 2023, we generated 44% growth in the third quarter of 2024. As you can see, we're well on our way to delivering a record year of net product sales. Our commercial team is focused on execution, driving continued momentum for Tava Lease, improving both institutional and community demand for ResLydia, and successfully transitioning all Gavretto patients and accounts to Rydgeo-labeled product. My sincere thanks to the entire team for all their hard work to grow our business in 2024. Moving to slide seven, I'll first discuss our performance with Tava Lease in the third quarter. On slide eight, you'll see our FDA approved indication, which is for adult patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia or CITP who've had an insufficient response to a previous treatment. Moving to slide nine, I'm pleased to report another strong quarter for Tava Lease with 2,797 bottles shipped to patients and clinics in the third quarter, a 16% increase versus the third quarter of 2023. And our eighth consecutive quarterly record high. We sold 2,793 bottles to our distribution network, resulting in $26.3 million in net product sales during the third quarter, an 8% increase from the same period last year. We continue to grow Tava Lease demand, both through refills from patients who stay on the product and new prescriptions for patients who are trying Tava Lease for the very first time. Moving to slide 10, now I'd like to take a few minutes to discuss our growing ResLidia sales. On slide 11, you'll see our FDA approved indication for ResLidia, which is for adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia with the susceptible IDH1 mutation as detected by an FDA approved test. Moving to slide 12, we shipped 444 bottles of ResLidia to patients and clinics in Q3, more than doubling the demand generated in the same period a year ago. We sold 429 bottles of ResLidia as our distribution channel reduced inventory by 15 bottles. This resulted in $5.5 million in third quarter net product sales, again, more than doubling compared to the prior year. We continue to stay focused on improving ResLidia adoption, both in institutions and the community by raising awareness of ResLidia's efficacy, particularly in patients who have failed upfront therapy with Venetoclax. Moving to slide 13, we are incredibly excited about our work to expand access to a Luticid nib in markets outside the US. We're expanding our partnership with Kisei, who currently markets and distributes Tava Lease in Japan to include a license agreement to develop and commercialize ResLidia in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. We believe Kisei is the right partner in these markets as we further our goal to make ResLidia accessible globally. And we're continuing to explore other opportunities for partnerships outside the US to bring this beneficial product to AML patients in need in other markets around the globe. Moving to slide 14, I'll now discuss our third quarter performance for Givretto, the first full quarter in which Givretto was available through Rigel. On slide 15, I'll begin by reviewing the FDA approved indications for Givretto, which include the treatment of adult patients with metastatic ret fusion positive non-small cell lung cancer, as well as adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age and older with advanced ret fusion positive thyroid cancer who require systemic therapy and who are radioactive iodine refractory. For the first full quarter with Givretto in our portfolio, we shipped 717 bottles to patients in clinics and sold 752 bottles of Givretto. Please note that Givretto is available in bottles of either 60 or 90 count capsules. And for reporting purposes, we report the total number of 60 count equivalent bottles. This resulted in $7.1 million in Givretto third quarter net product sales. We have now sold a total of $9 million of Givretto since transitioning it in late June. We are very happy that both the first full quarter of demand and net sales indicate that we are successfully transitioning over Givretto patients, prescribers, and accounts to Rigel's distribution network. Moving to slide 17, I'd like to wrap up my comments with some early insights on what we saw during our first full quarter with Givretto. We are incredibly pleased with the progress we've made to ensure both current patients taking Givretto, as well as those newly prescribed, continue to have access without interruption, and that prescribers can feel confident knowing that their patients can continue getting the therapy they need. Based on the first full quarter shipping Givretto to patients and clinics, we have seen an exceptionally smooth transition of patients through our hub, Rigel OneCare, and the specialty pharmacies in our network. And we have also seen solid ordering by many of the direct accounts we had expected to order through our specialty distributors. Our distributors have shipped 320 bottles to accounts, representing about 45% of our business. Specialty pharmacies shipped 397 bottles to patients, making up most of our business. We did expect that there would be more of our business coming through direct accounts, and have noticed that a handful of expected top direct accounts still have not yet placed an order. In addition, in this specialty pharmacy data, we are seeing that the majority of patients are prescribed Givretto below the standard dose of 400 milligrams once a day, indicating we may have an opportunity to reinforce dosing and administration, and particularly the starting dose of Givretto. Overall, Givretto, Resilidia, and Tavoliz have all contributed to our strong -over-year revenue growth, and we look forward to further expanding our impact on patients with our growing portfolio as we move forward to 2025. Thanks for your attention, and I will now turn the call over to Lisa to discuss our development progress. Lisa?

Thanks, Dave. Moving to slide 19, I'd like to begin by highlighting a series of abstracts that will be presented at posters at the upcoming ASH annual meeting in December. As Raul mentioned, initial data from the dose escalation part of our phase 1B study of R289 in patients with relapsed or refractory lower-risk MDS will be presented during the poster session on Monday, December 9th. Updated results using a data cutoff date of October 25th will be shared at the meeting. Additionally, a number of presentations related to a lutecidin abuse in patients with IDH1-mutated AML and MDS are planned. Moving to slide 20, we continue to execute on our strategy to expand our hematology and oncology pipeline. First, we're making meaningful progress advancing a lutecidinib into new clinical indications alongside our partners MD Anderson and the Connect Cancer Consortium. We believe a lutecidinib has potential in several cancers where mutated IDH1 plays a role, such as additional AML segments, myelodysplastic syndrome or MDS, and glioma, either as monotherapy or in combination. One clinical trial is now active under MD Anderson collaboration, and we're continuing to advance a lutecidinib and glioma with Connect. R289 is our novel dual IRAC1 and 4 inhibitor that is currently being evaluated in a phase 1B study in patients with relapsed or refractory lower-risk MDS. Enrollment in the fifth dose level is ongoing. We expect that the DLT observation period will be completed within December. We also remain focused on evaluating potential opportunities to in-license or acquire products that would be a strategic fit for our portfolio. We're looking for differentiated products in hematology, oncology or related areas, products that are late stage, possibly with registrational data, soon to have registrational data or more advanced, and products that can leverage our hematology and oncology infrastructure. As demonstrated with our acquisitions of a lutecidinib and pralcetinib, our goal is to continue to find assets that align with our organization pipeline and ability to execute. Slide 21 provides an overview of our strategic alliance with the MD Anderson Cancer Center to advance lutecidinib more broadly into AML, MDS and beyond. We're very proud of this collaboration and have previously shared that in September, the first patient was dosed or was enrolled in a phase 1B2 triplet therapy trial in IDH1 mutated AML evaluating a lutecidinib decided being in vanettoclax. It is also planned to evaluate a lutecidinib as a monotherapy in patients with IDH mutated CICUS and lower-risk MDS in combination with an HMA and high-risk MDS and as monotherapy as a post-transplant maintenance therapy for patients with IDH1 mutated hemologic malignancies. We expect these trials to position us to conduct a subsequent registrational trial or trials. Moving to slide 22, another important development collaboration we have is with the Connect Global Neuro-Oncology Consortium to conduct a phase two trial in patients with IDH1 mutated high-grade glioma. Gliomas account for around 30% of CNS tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults. Approximately a third of these are high-grade gliomas translating to approximately 800 to 1,000 new cases each year in the US. High-grade gliomas are a leading cause of cancer-related death in adolescents and young adults. Despite available therapies, the five-year survival of this population is less than 10%. Based on preliminary safety and efficacy results from a phase 1b2 clinical trial evaluating alluticidinib in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory IDH1 mutated glioma, we believe that alluticidinib has potential in glioma treatment. A phase two study of alluticidinib in combination with temozolamide called Target D will be included as a treatment arm in Connect's Target Study, a molecularly guided phase two umbrella clinical trial for high-grade glioma. The goal of this study is to determine whether the combination of alluticidinib and temozolamide followed by alluticidinib monotherapy can prolong the progression-free survival of patients with IDH1 mutated high-grade glioma when given following radiotherapy. We, along with Connect, are excited about alluticidinib's potential to provide a much needed new treatment option to this underserved patient population. We anticipate this trial will be activated by the end of this year. Next, I'd like to provide some background information on our clinical development program in lower-risk MDS with our novel -IRAC1-4 inhibitor R289, which you will see on slide 23. Lower-risk MDS is an area of high unmet need in a primarily elderly patient population facing progressive cytopenias, particularly anemia, resulting in transfusion dependency and increased risk of infections and a risk of progression to acute leukemia. Transfusion burden is high, with more than 80% of patients requiring red cell transfusions as supportive therapy. Long-term survival rates are poor due to transfusion burden and its associated morbidities, as well as a lack of curative therapies other than allogeneic stem cell transplantation, which a minority of patients are eligible for due to their advanced age and underlying health conditions. The primary goal of therapy is to reduce transfusion burden. Initial treatment options include ESAs if eligible and lenalidomide for DEL5Q patients. For transfusion-dependent patients, Lispatarsept and Imetelstat have recently been approved post ESAs or for ESA and eligible patients. In later lines of therapy, durable responses are difficult to attain and toxicity becomes more of an issue. There are no standard therapies for lower risk MDS patients with recurrent or refractory disease. In fact, hypomethylating agents were approved about 20 years ago, underscoring the need for new, safe, effective therapies for these patients. We believe that R289 has the potential to address the unmet needs in this patient population by targeting inflammatory signaling. Moving to slide 24, I'd like to highlight why we're excited about R289. Dysregulation of the immune and inflammatory signaling pathways is associated with MDS, with chronic stimulation of both the toll-like and IL-1 receptor pathways involving IRAC1 and IRAC4, leading to a pro-inflammatory marrow environment and cytopenias. IRAC1 and 4 activation, independent of this pathway, may also lead to persistent inhibition of hematopoietic cell differentiation. Co-targeting both IRAC1 and 4 may fully suppress inflammation and restore hematopoiesis and MDS. Clinically, IRAC4 inhibitors in MDS and AML have thus far shown only modest activity supporting this concept. In preclinical and healthy volunteer studies, R835, a dual IRAC1,4 inhibitor, was previously shown to suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine production. R289 is an oral prodrug that is rapidly converted to R835 in the gut that is currently being evaluated in lower-risk MDS. Slide 25 shows the design of our ongoing open-label phase 1B study of R289 in patients with relapsed refractory lower-risk MDS, which has a dose escalation phase with a standard 3 plus 3 design and a dose expansion cohort for confirmatory safety. The primary endpoints for this trial are safety and selection of the recommended dose for expansion. And secondary endpoints include hematologic improvement, response rates, and PK. Based on emerging data from the study, we've recently included two additional cohorts with twice daily dosing regimens for a total of five dose levels. The study continues to progress well, and enrollment in the fifth dose level, a split dose of 500 milligrams and 250 milligrams daily, is nearing completion. We expect the DLT evaluation period of this dose level will be completed in December. We're encouraged by the preliminary safety and efficacy data from the study thus far in this elderly patient population with a high transfusion burden, as summarized in the recently published ASHA abstract. Lastly, on slide 26, our RIP-K1 inhibitor programs are progressing well with our partner, Lily. RIP-K1 is implicated in a broad range of inflammatory cellular processes and plays a key role in tumor necrosis factor signaling. Ocaducertib, our non-CNS penetrant RIP-K1 inhibitor, previously referred to as R552, is currently being studied in an adaptive phase 2A, 2B clinical trial in up to 380 patients with active, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Phase 2A enrollment of approximately 100 patients is advancing well, with preliminary analysis of the phase 2A results anticipated within the first half of 2025. Our preclinical CNS penetrant RIP-K1 inhibitor program is also progressing toward lead candidate nomination. We're excited about the progress of our programs and their broad potential in rheumatoid arthritis and other immune and CNS diseases. Now, I'll pass the call to Dean to discuss our financial results for the quarter.

Thank you, Lisa. On slide number 28, during the third quarter, we shipped 2,793 bottles of Tavoliz to our specialty distributors. 2,797 bottles of Tavoliz were shipped to patients and clinics, while four bottles decreased the levels remaining in their distribution channels at the end of the quarter. We shipped 429 bottles of Resilidia to our specialty distributors. 444 bottles of Resilidia were shipped to patients and clinics, while 15 bottles decreased the levels remaining in our distribution channels at the end of the quarter. We shipped 752 bottles of Gavretto to our specialty distributors. 717 bottles of Gavretto were shipped to patients and clinics, while 35 bottles increased the levels remaining in our distribution channels at the end of the quarter. We reported net product sales from Tavoliz of $26.3 million in the third quarter, a growth of 8% compared to $24.5 million in the same period in 2023. We reported net product sales from Resilidia of $5.5 million in the third quarter, a growth of 107% compared to $2.7 million in the same period in 2023. And finally, we reported net product sales from Gavretto of $7.1 million in the third quarter, the first full quarter of Gavretto sales. Our net product sales from Tavoliz, Resilidia, and Gavretto were recorded net of estimated discounts, chargebacks, rebates, returns, co-pay assistance, and other allowances of $17.4 million. For the third quarter of 2024, our gross to net adjustment for Tavoliz, Resilidia, and Gavretto was approximately 36%, 22%, and 15% of gross product sales respectively. We'd like to highlight that during the fourth quarter, we made certain changes to our distribution channel arrangements for Tavoliz that will result in continued high quality access or reducing our distribution costs and favorably impacted our gross to net adjustment into the future. While this change is not expected to impact our bottle ship to patients and clinics during the quarter, we may see a reduction in bottles remaining in our distribution channels at the end of the quarter as inventory's normalized. Finally, for the fourth quarter, we expect our gross to net adjustment for Tavoliz, Resilidia, and Gavretto to be approximately 35%, 21%, and 22% of gross product sales respectively. On to the next slide. In addition to net product sales, our contract revenues from collaborations were $16.4 million in the third quarter. Contract revenues from collaborations consisted of $13 million from Qise, $3.3 million from Griffo, and $100,000 from Medisyn. The $13 million in revenues from our Qise collaboration includes $10 million related to an upfront fee from sub-licensing Resilidia, and $3 million for the delivery of drug supplies. Moving on to costs and expenses, our cost of product sales was approximately $8 million for the third quarter of 2024. Total costs and expenses were $41.3 million, compared to $32.6 million in the safe period for 2023. The increase in cost and expenses was primarily due to higher cost of product sales, driven primarily by increased product sales, a $2.3 million sub-licensing revenue fee paid to Forma, increased royalties, and amortization of intangible assets. In addition, there was an increase in personnel-related costs and commercial-related expenses. This quarter, we reported net income of $12.4 million, compared to a net loss of $5.7 million in the same period in 2023. We ended the quarter with cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $61.1 million, up from $49.1 million as of the end of the second quarter. We look to maintain our focused and disciplined financial approach into the future. With that, I'd like to turn the call back over to Raul.

Raul? Thank you, Dean. And moving on to slide 30, please. This is really an exciting time for Rigel. During the first three quarters of 24, we delivered on our goals that we set earlier in the year. First, we generated strong growth in our commercial business. We've achieved another record demand quarter for Tavalice and ResLydia, and grew our net product sales year over year. We expanded our portfolio with the addition of Gavretto, our third commercial product, which generated $7.1 million in net product sales in its first full quarter with us. We leveraged our commercial capabilities to transition the product to us, and are now focused on maximizing its potential. And we're well on our way to deliver another record quarter of revenues for calendar year 2024. Second, we made significant advancements in our development pipeline. We continue to progress R289, and we are incredibly excited to present additional safety and efficacy data from our phase 1B study in lower risk MDS at the ASH meeting next month. Our strategic collaborations with MD Anderson and Connect continue to advance, and we now have the first trial with MD Anderson underway. And lastly, as we made great strides in these areas, we continue to focus on maintaining financial discipline. All of these efforts have enabled us to generate positive net income for the three quarters and year to date. Now on slide 31. As we think about the future for Rigel and our progress in 24, and how it positions us to deliver continued growth in 25 and beyond, our corporate strategy remains focused on our major objectives, executing and expanding our commercial portfolio to generate top line growth, advancing and growing our development pipeline, and operating in a financially disciplined manner. Becoming a profitable company will allow us to be self-sustaining, and importantly, to reinvest in our own development pipeline. And we will outline our internal development plans for R289 and Uluta Sedinib in 2025. We've made significant progress in 24 and remain focused on continuing this momentum as we close out the year and head into 2025. Again, I'd like to thank you for your interest in Rigel. And with that, we will now open the call to your questions. Operator?

Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation number will indicate you're funded in the question queue. You may press star two to remove yourself from the queue. The participants using secret equipment and may be necessary to pick up the handset before pressing the star C. Only please for the first question. Our first question comes from the line of Joe Pangenis with HC Wainwright. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, everybody. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. Nice to see the approved products progress. So two questions, if you don't mind. So first, was hoping to see if you can provide any more color with regard to Tavalise and the balance or mix between refills and new prescriptions?

Yeah, would you

provide some commentary on that? Sure. Thanks for the question, Joe. As you know, Tavalise is a product that patients take and will continue taking as long as their platelets are controlled or elevated. And sometimes that takes a while. So I will say that the majority of our business is carryover. Once we have patients on board, they will tend to stay on therapy. And that is the majority of our business. And because we've grown, new patients starts. Over the last couple of years, I think we're seeing that growth and carryover go along with that. So that's what I meant to say, or that's what I was referring to when I said both, our growth is both from new patients starting as well as carryover, but the majority is

carryover. Got it, appreciate that clarification in color. And then the second question that I have, I wanna make sure if I heard correctly. So nice to see the early traction with Garedo. And if I heard you correctly, it said that several top centers have still not placed orders. I was just curious, is this really just based on logistics or how would you characterize it?

First of all, what I said in my prepared comments, just to be clear, is I said there's a handful of top centers that we haven't seen direct orders from. And so, we had expected to see that and we haven't. So we're trying to understand that a little bit, but the good thing about our data is we have a significant portion through the specialty pharmacy network. So what we could be seeing is patients are in the specialty pharmacy network when they transition to the Rigel network versus the institution buying the drug and then filling it there. But overall, actually, what I said in my prepared marks was that 45% of our business was through the distribution channel to direct accounts in Q3. When we just looked at this for October, it's up to 50-50. So I think this is improving and it is more of like what we expected, more of our business coming through the direct channel. Hope that helps,

Joe. It certainly does. Thanks for the color.

Thank you,

Joe. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Igor Nojomovic with Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, Jim. This is Oshk on VEGAL. Thanks for taking my question. I appreciate all the updates here. I just had a follow-up on the last question on the Gavretto sort of relaunch. How much of a stocking benefit was there in the sort of initial phase of the launch, at least with you guys? And on the sort of reported sales, 7 million looks like it's at least on a similar run rate for the quarter compared to what the prior entity did with it last year. So how should we think about the growth trajectory from here and if we should be thinking about it in a more aggressive way or maybe more modestly from here given the sort of restart? Thanks.

Okay. Do you wanna take a second? Sure, thanks for the question. First of all, remember that at the end of Q2, right at the very end, we filled some orders to our distributors and that was what I would refer to as stocking. It was about $1.9 million in sales. This quarter, we sold 717 bottles or we shipped 717 bottles and we had just a slight more 750 odd bottles sold. So there were another maybe 30 some bottles built up in the channel. So I would just say that the majority is demand that we saw in Q, the overwhelming majority of what we saw in Q3 is true demand, patient demand, account demand. And what I will say is that, obviously we started the quarter with some level of shipments going out to patients in clinics. We ended the quarter with a much higher level of shipments going out to patients in clinics as more people transitioned over. So I can't really comment any more than that, but we would expect to see some continued demand growth as we move forward.

And translated specifically into bottle counts, we had 228 bottles of increase in our distribution channel, our inventory that Dave described in Q2 and that was essentially the full amount of revenue. And then we had an incremental build of that inventory of 35 bottles. The remainder of the bottles in Q3 were from you know, shipments to patients in clinics.

Understood, thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question, I'm sorry, as a reminder, if you have any questions, you may press star one on your telephone keypad in order to join the queue. Our next question comes from the line of CalPITPATEL with B Riley Security. Please proceed with your question.

Yeah, hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. For the proof of concept data in lower risk MDS, I guess, first, to the extent that you can share here, the grade three for adverse events that are listed in the abstract, was there any indication that these were dose dependent or generally occurring in doses of 500 milligrams or higher?

Yeah, thanks for the question. I think that will be shared in more detail in December.

At the ASH meeting and the poster presentation.

Okay, got it. And how much more data should we expect then at ASH in terms of maybe the number of patients and the number of cohorts and things like that?

Right, so for the abstract, we used a data cutoff date of July 15th, and we're updating that to October 25th. So it's gonna be about another three months or so of data. So you'll see data on the patients from the fourth dose level and a little bit beyond that.

Okay, got it. Thank you very much. Thank you, Calvin.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Farzin Haku with Jefferies, please proceed with your question.

Hi, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. To start off with the four, with R289 in the low risk MDS patients, how should we think about the bar for success? And what would you need to see in phase one B to advance the program forward?

I'll let Lisa comment. Let me just preface this by saying that we're really excited about this data. This molecule was a molecule discovered here at Rigel. We own full rights to it. We think definitely the most advanced IRAC one and four inhibitor that there is available. We are excited to study here in low risk MDS where we see a very good mechanism to indication. And we're really interested to try it here. We're delighted to present the data that you saw in the abstract and substantially much more detail in the poster to come. In terms of the bar, Lisa, maybe do you want to comment on that?

Yeah, I think that if we look at the treatment landscape in lower risk MDS, obviously we've got kind of the first line agents, patients if they're eligible for having ESAs, they will have ESAs followed by Luspatterset. These are transfusion dependent patients I'm talking about now and a metal stat. And there's really nothing afterwards until HMAs. So that's kind of quite a gap. And in terms of efficacy, HMAs, in terms of improving transfusion or reducing transfusion requirements, they have about a 20% transfusion independence associated with them. So that's pretty low on one end. And then, our study is unique in that it's enrolling patients that have previously received HMAs as well as Luspatterset, a metal stat, et cetera. So I would say, and you know that the response rates for first line, it's around 40%, but like I said, our study is unique in that we are including relapsed refractory patients that weren't included in those first line settings. So I don't know that I would put a number on it right now. I think we're very encouraged by what we're seeing based on the preliminary safety and efficacy data thus far.

That's helpful. And then for Gavrilo, I was curious, for the new safety signal related to the risk of severe and fatal infection, how rate limiting do you expect it to be for uptake? Does RADEVMO, the competitive program, have the same issue?

So do you wanna comment on that?

I would say that from, yeah, then maybe Dave can comment. So from the clinical perspective, this really isn't something new. Looking at the ARROW study, we were aware that infections were reported. This is in the label already in the safety section. We know that mechanistically, there's a rationale for why this is happening. We know that in addition to retinibition, that these increased risk of infections may stem from the off-target inhibition of JAK-1 and JAK-2, which are not the primary targets, but nonetheless, there is some off-target activity there. And we know also in terms, most of the infections were pneumonias, which are very common in this patient population. About 80% of patients get pneumonias with lung cancer and receiving treatment for lung cancer. So this is a situation that oncologists are very familiar with managing.

Dave, do you wanna comment on now what you've heard from SINCEA? Sure,

patient safety is paramount. And I'm very proud to say that we sent the DHCP to more than 10,000 healthcare providers. That said, we haven't received any calls to our medical information line regarding that update. And as Lisa said, this is non-small cell lung cancer. These are oncologists who treat very sick patients all the time. You have two retinibitors on the market with significant warnings and precautions on both, and different sets of warnings and precautions. So we don't see any, at this point, we don't see any changes in how we look at the opportunity for Gavretto moving forward in the ret fusion positive non-small cell lung cancer space.

Thank you so much.

Thank you. Our next question, again, from Kalthuk Patel with B. Riley Security. Please proceed with your question.

Yeah, thanks for taking the follow-up. I just had one more on the lower risk MDS program. There was another agent, Curis's IRAC inhibitor that was started in an investigator sponsored study, but then later withdrawn for the same indication. So I guess if you had to highlight a few differentiated factors with R289 versus the others, what would they be?

It's hard to comment on other people's. I would say ours is an IRAC 1N4 inhibitor. I believe theirs was an IRAC 4 inhibitor. That is a significant difference. I think Lisa highlighted in one of the slides where we show that inhibiting both 1N4 provides a more profound inhibition of inflammatory cytokines, presumably in the bone marrow in this case. So that is an important difference between those two. And as I said earlier, I don't believe there's another IRAC 1N4 inhibitor in development, certainly not in more advanced development available. So this is the first to work on a 1-4. And that rationale, the more profound cytokine inhibition was one of the reasons we liked 1N4 over 4. And Lisa, any other comments?

No, I think that fairly pretty well summarizes it.

Yeah. Okay, wonderful. Thank you again. Thank you, Calvin.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Raul Rodriguez for closing comments.

Thank you. And thank you everyone for joining on the call today and your continued interest in Rigel. I can't say it's a very exciting time for the company, having data to share an exciting product and more coming, I think is really a great place to be. The year has gone very well for us in terms of commercial growth, in addition to the portfolio and advancements in our development. And we look forward to telling you more about that in 2025. So with that, I'd like to also just always thank our employees for their continued commitment to our cause and improving the lives of patients and look forward to updating you further in other calls. Take care.

And this concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.