Sonos, Inc.

Q3 2022 Earnings Conference Call

8/10/2022

spk01: Good afternoon. My name is Emma, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Sonos third quarter fiscal 2022 conference call.
spk11: Telephone keypad.
spk01: If you would like to withdraw your question, again, press the star 1. Thank you. James Buglanis. Head of Investor Relations, you may begin your conference.
spk10: Good afternoon and welcome to Sonos' third quarter fiscal 2022 earnings conference. Meet today our Sonos CEO, Patrick Spang. Chief Legal Officer, Eddie Lazarus. For those who joined the call early, of live music series From the Basement, created by Sonos Soundboard member Nigel Godrich. Sonos Radio partnered with episodes coming out monthly. Before I hand it over to Patrick, I would like to remind everyone that these statements reflect our views as of today only and should not be considered as representative.
spk11: These statements are also subject to material results to differ materially from expectations. fully detailed under the caption risk factors in our filings with the SEC.
spk10: During this call, we will also refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. For information regarding our non-GAAP financials and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures, please refer to today's press release regarding our thoughts posted to the investor relations portion of our website. As a result, earnings presentation and conference call transcript will be available on our investor relations
spk11: Hello, everyone. Earlier today, we'll be leaving Sonos to pursue another professional opportunity.
spk08: Eddie Lazarus, our chief legal officer, will succeed Brittany as interim CFO effective September 1st. Thank Brittany for her hard work and dedication and the previous seven as an played an instrumental role at Sonos, helping us drive financial performance, make smart investments in the future, and increase shareholder value. Sonos and wish her well in her future endeavors. While many of you know Eddie as our chief legal officer, he also has past experience in finance and strategy.
spk11: In the company's strategic planning and capital allocation decisions.
spk08: He's also a board member at Sequoia Fund, a concentrated long-only equity fund. Eddie has always played an active role in our strategic planning, the finance and technology organization.
spk11: So he knows the team and the intricacies. Reporting and planning organization.
spk08: We have a accounting team that will ensure we don't miss a beat.
spk11: Now, turning to earnings, since we reported Q2 earnings, we have seen the macroeconomic backdrop. As you all know, the dollar is appreciated significantly relative to other major currencies. Results weren't in line with our ambition.
spk08: Our teams executed well against this challenging backdrop, delivering constant currency revenue growth of 2% year-over-year. On a reported basis, revenues of $371.8 million were down 2%. We delivered adjusted EBITDA of $42.1 million, representing a margin of 11.3%. Our results in the quarter were negatively impacted by three primary factors. First, as many other companies have already discussed this earnings cycle, we saw a softening of consumer demand in our product categories starting in June. We believe this is in part a reflection of consumers shifting their near-term focus from goods to services and travel. Second, we remain supply constrained in some of our key products like AMP and Beam. And as a result, we continue to have a backlog which caused us to miss out on revenue opportunities in the quarter. And third, the strengthening of the U.S. dollar throughout the quarter resulted in a $15 million foreign currency headwind. Let me provide some additional detail on what we saw from a consumer demand and product perspective in the quarter and how that's informing our view of Q4. Softening consumer demand across our product categories had an outsized impact on Rome, which was lapping its successful launch in the same quarter last year. In June, we launched Ray, our compact soundbar, which offers the best bang for your buck under $300. We observed that the launch was impacted by softening consumer demand, compounded by a substantial drop in TV sales versus last year. As a result, Ray is significantly missing our expectations for the year. Nonetheless, we remain incredibly excited about having a terrific product at a new price point that has the potential to reach new customers. Looking beyond the short term, we expect that Ray will be very successful as it continues to receive excellent reviews from tech and lifestyle media. Changing consumer spending patterns influenced our retail partners' outlook, who in turn are taking a cautious approach to their inventory positions. As a result of the macroeconomic softness we are seeing, we are extending the timeline we expect it to take to hit our long-term targets of $2.5 billion in revenue, 45-47% gross margins, and 15-18% adjusted EBITDA margin. However, nothing has changed our conviction in the tremendous long-term opportunity ahead for Sonos. Regardless of short-term economic fluctuations, our category leadership is proven and established. Our brand is strong. Our awareness among our affluent target customer base is growing. Individuals continue to find new and exciting ways to consume content throughout their lives. And accordingly, they're increasingly demanding better products and services to bring this content to life. This trend plays to our strengths. The Sonos flywheel of new household acquisition and existing customer repurchases continues to spin. We have a robust product roadmap and a track record of at least two new product launches annually. We have a large addressable market and secular tailwinds that further underscore the long-term opportunity for Sonos. Despite the macro dynamics of Q3, we gained or held share in key categories across our geographies, and we saw steady repurchase trends among our growing base of existing households. In the past few quarters, I've spoken extensively about the power of our flywheel, and this is yet another proof point that the model we've built is working. Sonos is not a typical one-and-done purchase. Our existing customers show us time and time again that they return on a predictable basis to purchase additional products. This is true of customer cohorts that started prior to the pandemic, true of those cohorts that started with Sonos during the pandemic, and true of those cohorts that have started this fiscal year. We see consistent repurchase behavior across all of these cohorts. We are focusing on what we can control, creating and delivering products that delight consumers. Relentlessly driving innovation is critical to fueling the Sonus flywheel and delivering long-term growth. We continue to thoughtfully invest in innovation, both organically, as you've seen with our five product and service launches this year, and through acquisitions, like you saw with the acquisition of MITE, which closed in the quarter. The MITE team has integrated seamlessly, and we are very excited to take advantage of MITE's groundbreaking technology to further differentiate our existing and future product portfolio. While investing in the delivery of our product roadmap is of the utmost priority, we are also taking a hard look at our expense base. We are investing in an exciting number of new products and services in both existing and new categories. I'm confident that these put us in a position to emerge from this period stronger and take a greater share of the $96 billion global audio market. Now I'll turn the call over to Brittany to provide more details on our results and outlook.
spk05: Thank you, Patrick. We delivered year-over-year top-line growth of 2% on a constant currency basis or a decline of 2% on a reported basis to $371.8 million, with EBITDA margins of 11.3%. As Patrick called out above, we are now seeing a more challenging macro environment and the continued strengthening U.S. dollar impacting our results. and we have continued to be supply-constrained on certain products, especially AMP. These factors led to mixed performance across our regions. Year over year, revenue in the Americas grew 4% on a reported and constant currency basis. EMEA declined 11% on a reported basis and 1% on a constant currency basis. EMEA revenue was 30% of our business in Q3 and is experiencing particularly soft results given the ongoing war in Ukraine and weakening currency relative to the U.S. dollar. APAC declined 7% or 4% on a constant currency basis. APAC comparisons got significantly harder from Q2 as we grew over 100% since last Q3. Sonos speaker revenue increased 1% year-over-year, driven by the introduction of Ray in Q3 and the ongoing strength in Arc and One partially offset by lapping the launch of Roam last year. Sonos system products revenue declined 19% due to supply availability constraints. Partner products and other revenue decreased 8%, primarily driven by lower accessory sales. Gross margin increased 250 basis points relative to Q2 to 47.3%. Timing of expenses related to higher component costs was the primary driver of this sequential improvement. On a year-over-year basis, gross margin increased 30 basis points driven by higher selling prices, partially offset by higher component costs. As we have discussed in prior quarters, we continue to invest in the business this year, notably in R&D. We are proud to have launched five new products, including Beam Gen 2, Roam SL, Roam Colors, Ray, and Sonos Voice Control. We have also made three technology acquisitions this year to support our long-term product roadmap. Additionally, we have been investing in our systems to support further scale and are pleased to have successfully completed the go-live of our new ERP system in the corridor. While we had some minor bumps, as with every ERP implementation, we have successfully been able to execute on our business and report our financials thanks to a great effort across the teams at Sonos. Excluding legal fees and transaction costs, OpEx grew 4% year-over-year, driven by product development, professional fees, and additional headcount, partially offset by lower variable compensation. We delivered adjusted EBITDA of $42.1 million, representing a margin of 11.3%. Adjusted EBITDA declined by 10% year-over-year, driven by the higher investments in the business and lower revenue. From a free cash flow standpoint, we had negative cash flow from operations in the quarter, primarily due to inventory investments. Heading into the holiday quarter, we usually have a seasonal build of inventory, but given the softer demand we're seeing, our inventory levels are higher than we would like them to be in Q3. We have now adjusted our inventory builds and component buys and believe we will get to a better inventory position after the holiday quarter. Despite the use of cash in Q3, we still delivered $76 million in cash from operations in the first nine months of the year and ended the quarter with $440 million of cash and no debt. As we work through our inventory position over the next few quarters, you should see a return to a more normalized free cash flow profile. Our balance sheet remains strong and affords us significant flexibility to navigate this uncertain economic environment. During Q3, we used $100 million of cash on the acquisition of MITE, and we remain very excited about adding this technology to our future product roadmap. We also spent $43 million on share repurchases. Over the first nine months of the year, we have deployed $117 million of cash towards repurchases, which leaves $33 million remaining at the end of Q3 on our $150 million authorization. Now turning to our Fiscal 22 outlook. In light of the slowing macro environment, softening run rates in our business, and caution from some of our retail channel partners, along with FX headwinds and continued supply constraints, we expect a challenging Q4. As we evaluated these trends, we decided to push an anticipated product launch from Q4 into Q1 of 23, which should lead to better launch timing, but which further impacts our Q4 expectations. To cover these factors in a little more detail, we are currently forecasting the run rates we are seeing on our product registrations to be stable to slightly softer through Q4. We are also resetting our expectations on Ray during this economic period, though it continues to get strong reviews. Registrations are our best proxy for sell-through and our closest sense for real-time demand, along with our DTC channel. And we are watching these closely as we forecast. From a sell-in perspective, which is how we recognize revenue in our non-DTC channels, we are expecting softer ordering from our retail partners. Our current channel inventory remains healthy ahead of holiday sell-in, but we are seeing extra caution as partners evaluate their inventory positions and decide how many weeks of inventory they will stock, which is especially impacting our revenue in EMEA. We are also assuming that the dollar continues to be strong, resulting in an estimated $50 million FX impact for the year, including a $17 million impact in Q4. Finally, we will start to be in a better supply position on AMP in Q4, but do still expect to have a backlog exiting the year. We have seen the supply situation improve relative to last quarter and are catching up on our product availability. While we noted in Q2 we were watching many of these factors, we have now seen their impact, and it has been particularly challenging to have supply constraints concurrent with demand weakness. We do see some easing in the demand for critical components as well as the cost of shipping and logistics, but these benefits will largely not be seen until 23 given lead times. We continue to believe our supply chain strategy and continued diversification with Malaysia and now Vietnam will serve us well. As a result of all these factors, we are lowering our full-year revenue guidance to a range of $1.73 to $1.755 billion. This range represents revenue growth of 1% to 2% year-over-year. The midpoint of this guidance implies Q4 revenue of $306 million, down 15% year-over-year. On a constant currency basis, this would still represent 4.4% growth for the full year, with Q4 down 10% at the midpoint. If we had been fully in stock on AMP and not shifted our product release, we would have expected growth in Q4 on a constant currency basis. We would note that these are matters of timing, and this revenue will be earned in fiscal year 23 instead. We are narrowing our gross margin guidance range to 45.7% to 45.9% for fiscal year 22. At the midpoint, this implies a 41% gross margin for Q4. This margin is below the levels of the last few quarters for two main reasons. The first is elevated component costs required to improve our in-stock position. We incur these costs in advance and expense them in the quarter we expect to sell the product. The other major impact in the quarter is FX. Despite our expected Q4 gross margin performance, we remain committed to operating our business with a long-term annual gross margin target of 45% to 47%, and we do expect to achieve that in fiscal year 22. Our Q4 revenue decline flows through to adjusted EBITDA. As a result, we are lowering our full-year guidance range to $250 million to $230 million. This represents an adjusted EBITDA margin in the range of 12.4% to 13.1%. For Q4, at the midpoint, this implies adjusted EBITDA of negative $30 million. Despite the importance of continuing to invest in our long-term roadmap for the amazing products we expect to deliver in 23 and beyond, we are taking cost actions given the change in the forecast. This includes pausing our hiring, our travel, and making other adjustments to OpEx as we look at Q4 and fiscal year 23. We expect to provide further guidance regarding fiscal year 23 on our Q4 earnings call. As Patrick discussed, nothing has changed regarding our conviction in the long-term growth potential of Sonos. We continue to believe that Sonos can achieve $2.5 billion of revenue, 45% to 47% gross margins, and 15% to 18% adjusted EBITDA margins. But because of the changes in the macroeconomic environment, it will take us longer than previously anticipated to deliver these targets. When we have more certainty on these factors, we will provide a further update on timing. Despite the uncertain environment, we have significant brand equity, a resilient and loyal premium customer, and a large and growing market opportunity. We believe these attributes, along with a history of consistently delivering innovative new products, support our flywheel and position us well to deliver tremendous shareholder value over time. We are operating in a dynamic and challenging environment, but we are proud of our team's execution and we are confident we will build upon our category leadership and exit as an even stronger business. Finally, thank you, Patrick, for the kind words. It is bittersweet that after 10 years of being involved with Sonos, including almost three and a half years as CFO, I will be moving on to a new career opportunity where I will serve as both CFO and Chief Business Officer. I am so proud of what Sonos has achieved, and despite the macro trends discussed, I know Sonos is well positioned for the long term. The product roadmap, healthy gross margins, incredible IP, and strong balance sheet all position the company for future success. It has been truly a pleasure to work alongside such a talented and dedicated executive team. I want to thank Patrick, Eddie, my incredible leadership team, and the whole Sonos team for their support. I continue to be a fan of Sonos and wish them the best of luck moving forward. With that, I'll turn the call over to Eddie.
spk00: Good afternoon. First off, I'd just like to say how much I've enjoyed and appreciated having the chance to work so closely with Brittany these last three-plus years. She's been a wonderful colleague, and I know she'll continue to thrive in her next endeavor. I'm also honored to step into her shoes to lead a world-class finance team and to work with Patrick even more closely on seizing the business opportunities that lie ahead of us. I would just also say that my additional responsibilities as interim CFO will not impact our strategy to defend our intellectual property and hold Google accountable for their infringements. To that end, there have been a few recent developments. First, in the so-called patent showdown in our federal court case against Google in Northern California, the judge has rendered a split decision on the two representative claims at issue. The judge ruled that Google does infringe our zone scenes patent, but also ruled for Google on the other patent. We respectfully disagree with that adverse ruling. Second, Google filed two new cases against us in Northern California, alleging infringement of a total of seven patents and two mirror image cases at the International Trade Commission based on the same patents. We will defend vigorously against this attempt to dissuade us from pursuing our patent rights. Our track record in defending against Google is strong, as reflected most recently in a ruling in Google's Canadian case against us, where the court found Sonos does not infringe the patent at issue. This follows our successful defenses in Germany, the Netherlands, and France. Overall, our litigation results have continued to affirm the strength of our portfolio and our prospects for attaining damages and a fair royalty. We look forward to our day in court for the patent showdown trial scheduled to commence later this year in October. With that, I would like to turn the call over for questions.
spk01: As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, Press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from the line of Tom Fort with DA Davidson. Your line is now open.
spk07: Great. Thank you. I have one question and one follow-up. First off, Brittany, though, it's been a pleasure working with you, and I wish you the best of luck in the future. And then, Eddie, you clearly are capable of wearing many hats, which is very impressive. So for my first question, do you think your sales are being impacted by either the decline in the housing market with rising interest rates, and or consumers devoting a larger portion of their discretionary spending on travel.
spk08: Hey, Tom, it's Patrick. I'll take that one. We're watching the housing market closely. Our America's revenue grew actually 4% in the quarter. We believe that, you know, to your point, we've also, you know, heard from others and I think seen anecdotally the focus this summer on travel and services spend. So, you know, from everything we've seen, there's something to that. And then, you know, I think really as we think about the pattern, it was really something that hit us in June as we talked about. So we didn't see the demand materialize as we had expected after what was in April and May that were, you know, in line with what we'd expected. And we obviously had Ray and Rome Colors launching in June as well. And we just didn't see, you know, the demand rise. really materialize in the way that we'd expected given the macro environment. And that really compounded because we also saw retailers see that same macro weakness across all of their inventory positions, not Sonos specifically, and start to back off any orders of products and just get more cautious across the board, which also impacts us as we go through that. So So hopefully that's helpful in terms of understanding what we saw.
spk07: Great. Thanks, Patrick. And then for my follow-up, can you talk about your ability to adjust prices outside the U.S. for the strong dollar?
spk06: I can take that one.
spk05: You know, it's certainly something that we are looking at and we'll always keep in mind as we think about our commitment to maintaining that 45 to 47 percent gross margin. But we obviously also took price increases last September. And so it's something that we'll, you know, really want to make sure is the right long term decision for the business as we contemplate something like that.
spk07: Great. Thanks for taking my question.
spk01: Thank you. Thanks, Tom. Your next question comes from the line of Brent Phil with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
spk03: Thanks. Patrick, if you had to put macro versus execution issues, is this all pinned to macro? Were there any competitive or any missteps from an execution perspective on the inside, how would you frame that? Is this 99% macro? How would you frame that balance?
spk08: that's, you know, we, this is exactly the question we asked ourselves, you know, Brent, as we started to see the macroeconomic and one of the, one of the things that, um, we've paid close attention to is that market share and what's happening in the market, um, more generally. And as I mentioned, like we're holding steady from everything we can see across our key categories or gaining share. Um, and so we feel good about our position right now. Um, We're also looking at the reviews from the media, from our customers, and from our channel partners as it comes to new products like Ray. And those are living up to the kind of reviews you would expect from any Sonos product. And the feedback from retailers has been good. And the feedback from retailers has been that we are holding or gaining shares. So we feel... good about the position we're in right now. So we largely, you know, we largely chalk it up to macro, but I also believe we can always get better at execution. And so, you know, as I mentioned, we're going to make sure that the investments we have been making, the investments we're planning to make, all will pay off, you know, for the long term and are prudent in the environment that we're in. But definitely largely macro from what we can see today, Brent.
spk03: And then deterioration in June, was that kind of second part of June? And I guess into July and August, have you seen things stabilize and improve, gotten worse? Can you give us some color? And, Brittany, can you just follow up on the decision to push out the new solution in the quarter to next year? Was that just, hey, was it just because it wasn't ready, or was it you're just like, why push it out now in this environment, if you can clarify that?
spk06: Yeah, happy to. So I would say...
spk05: As we looked at June, it really was, as Patrick just said, a lot of the macro factors that we talked about. You know, we've also continued to see the dollar strengthen. So FX was a part of that as we look going forward. And then, as you remember, probably Ray went to general availability in June. So we were able to see how, you know, that product was doing and really factor that performance into our portfolio. go-forward outlook. And so as I said in my remarks, we are expecting, as we look at run rates now, that we see a stabilization in most of our run rates from a registration basis, and then maybe some slight continued softening for some product lines. We've tried to be pretty thoughtful just as we look through the registration data. Nothing that I would call out thematically on those, because that's probably the One of the next questions, there's nothing thematically I would call out across those, just stable to slightly softer. But I would call out, as we talked about, that our retail partners in the Americas, but especially in EMEA, are also being quite cautious on how they think about inventory right now, and inventory as they go into the holiday quarter, and As we look at it, I would say we do not have too much inventory in the channel with our retail partners at all right now. We're quite comfortable with where that sits, except for the fact that they are being quite cautious. And so that obviously impacts what we're expecting to see from a sell-in basis. that is more of a one-time impact as they readjust how many weeks on hand they want to have. So that's a lot of what we're looking at. And when we look at all of those things, you know, including retailers being cautious heading into the holiday quarter and what the environment looks like, we thought that the product would do better if we launched it in Q1 rather than in Q4. Great.
spk03: Thank you very much. Thanks, Brent.
spk01: Your next question comes from the line of Rod Hall with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.
spk12: Yeah, thanks for the question. I guess I wanted to come back to the inventory comment that you just made there, Brittany, and ask, you know, of course we see this as well with TVs and all kinds of other things in retail. I'm curious what you guys think it takes for retailers to get to a point where they feel they know how much inventory they want to have on hand. Do you think that You know, from your experience, they'll know that after we get through the back to school season or, you know, how do you think this flows on through the back end of the year here in terms of people's decisions on inventory? If you think inventory levels are, in fact, pretty low. And then I have a follow up to that.
spk06: I would say we think they're low for our products.
spk05: That's what we track most closely. Our view is that as our partners look at continued sell-through rates and continued movement of that inventory, that we'll continue to have constructive conversations around you know, what they need to do. That said, they are balancing their overall inventory levels, not just their inventory levels with Sonos. And that's something that we do need to watch, to your point, from a TV sales standpoint. But everybody wants to, you know, sell what they can sell in the holiday quarter. And so that is where we have a bit of confidence that, you know, our products are still good products for them to have in the store and important holiday products for them to carry.
spk12: Okay. Thanks, Brittany. And then I guess I wanted to come back to the systems weakness. And I know you called out supply as the main driver of that. I'm just curious, particularly the AMP, we noticed the lead times are still really long. What is the challenge there with that product? And do you think there's any macro effect there? Or do you really do think that's all just supply? It just seems like it's an expensive product and it's a specialist installer type of product. So I wonder how those people are behaving these days in addition to the supply constraints?
spk05: Yeah, Ron, it's a great question. I would say it's one that we have a little bit less visibility on right now just because we haven't had the product in stock to see how that's changed. I can tell you from what we are seeing and as we talk to installers, They continue to have an enormous amount of demand for that product and can't wait for us to get back in stock on it. It is one of the products where we've had the biggest challenge from a component standpoint. And I think you can tell from my gross margin commentary in Q4 that we are doing absolutely everything we can to get the components we need to get that product back in stock and expect, you know, by the end of Q4 and certainly by Q1 that we'll be back to, you know, the inventory levels that we need on amp.
spk12: Great. Okay. Thanks, Brittany. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of John Babcock with Bank of America. Your line is now open.
spk02: Hey, thanks for taking my question. I guess just following up on that discussion on the supply chain, could you just talk about general trends in that area and also trends for component costs and how that's looking for you?
spk06: Yeah, it is thankfully starting to.
spk08: She's on mute.
spk05: Sorry, I was on mute. Thank you, Patrick. Because you knew I was talking. I would say we have seen improvement in that area. So I would say particularly on shipping and logistics, as I called out in my remarks, we have started to see some improvement there. We have started to see some improvement from a component standpoint. There are still components that are are challenging to get. But between the work that our teams have done, as we've talked about on past quarters, to really get as many components in as we can, you know, I think as we look ahead, we are seeing improvement in both our ability to maintain supply. You know, I think as demand has softened a bit, not just for us, but for others in the industry as well, that's also going to provide some easing from a supply chain standpoint.
spk02: Gotcha. And then just generally, you know, as we, you know, get into the first quarter of 23, and, well, I guess really early, and now in the fourth quarter, but as you move into the first quarter of 23 and, you know, say things don't improve from a macro standpoint, how will you ultimately think about product launches, you know, then? I mean, is the goal to, you know, get out product launches that you were thinking about ahead of the holiday season until you launch that quarter anyway, or do you continue to push that back. I mean, what's the general approach or thinking around that?
spk08: we, we always consider the type of product that it is, um, John and the timing around that. So we're trying to take, you know, as many factors as we can, um, into account, obviously readiness is one of those, but also, um, what is it? So if it was a, so Rome is a great example of making sure that lined up for instance, you know, uh, with last spring, summer, um, and hitting a time like that. And so, um, I think this is a bit unique, uh, in terms of where we are right now, but certainly we'll look, uh, to see what the situation is happening on the macro front. As we think about the other product launches, make sure we want to set them up for the most success possible. And so we remain committed to at least two new products, two new product launches every year. As you know, we've done five across this year. And so we'll also make sure that we're balancing that with what we need to do to continue to drive progress and reach our long-term targets.
spk02: Thanks. And then just a last question, and maybe it's a little bit early from this standpoint, but as it pertains to the Inflation Reduction Act, you know, obviously some tax changes there. I don't know if you've gotten a chance to kind of go through that and provide some initial read, but any color on that would be great.
spk05: Yeah, we have. I would say just an initial read, but it does not really impact us from a tax standpoint. You know, we still have a valuation allowance up, and we're still not really a taxpayer at this point. And so at least from what we've looked at and for the foreseeable future, not a big impact for us.
spk02: Yeah, thank you.
spk08: Thanks, John.
spk01: Your next question comes from the line of Eric Woodring with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.
spk09: Guys, thanks for taking my questions. I guess maybe if we just start on the fiscal 4Q kind of implied guide, I'd love to just kind of get a better sense maybe of the biggest impacts or the biggest headwinds to revenue, right? I think, Brittany, you implied if you had been able to fulfill AMP backlog and launch a new product that would have delivered, I think it's about 35 million of additional revenue, but correct me if I'm wrong. I don't want to speak out of line. FX is an incremental 17 million headwind. So there's a fair amount that's still left over there. I'd just love to know maybe if you could help us kind of think about rank ordering, what the biggest impact would be for that remainder of revenue headwind in the September quarter. That would be helpful. And then I have a follow-up. Thanks.
spk05: Yeah, of course, Eric. So we didn't quantify those. What we said is that on a constant currency basis, if we'd been in stock on AMP and if we hadn't pushed the product launch, we would have grown. So, you know, that's obviously a big part of it. We did quantify FX for you at about 17 million. And then I would say, you know, the rest of the delta between, I think, what we were hoping to achieve in Q4 and what it looks like we're achieving in Q4 is really what we would attribute to, you know, macro softness from a demand standpoint, you know, across our product line, including, you know, how Ray is delivering. And so that would be sort of the rest of the delta on that change in Q4 guidance. And that macro point is, you know, both run rate, but also this dynamic with retail partner inventory that we've called out.
spk09: Right. Okay. That makes a lot of sense. Thank you, Brittany. And then maybe just a quick clarification on, you know, I know you mentioned higher levels of balance sheet inventory that you'll kind of work through over the next, call it quarter or two, as you get past the holidays. But Anyway, you can help us understand kind of the mix of raw material there versus finished goods. Perhaps the comments imply maybe it's more finished goods than it historically would be, but just want to make sure we're thinking about that correctly. Thank you.
spk05: Yeah, of course. And you'll see the full breakout. We break that out in our queue. So when our queue gets published, you'll see the exact numbers. I would say it's more on both. We've got more component inventory than we typically hold and we have more finished goods. We have more component inventory because we've been trying to drive ownership of more components to mitigate some of these supply chain challenges we've had. And then we have more finished goods, I would say, because the demand trajectory relative to what we were ramping to has just changed. I think the good news for us is our products are long-lived products. We keep them for a long time. They last well. And so it'll just be a process for us as we go through Q4, but then really as we get into Q1, which is our seasonally highest quarter of working down that inventory. What we have done is we have certainly slowed down the amount of new finished goods that we're producing to spend some time correcting for that inventory and get back into a, you know, more normal inventory position, you know, likely at the end of the holiday quarter.
spk09: Okay, that's really helpful. Maybe if I could just one final follow-up on the gross margins. I just want to be clear, you know, you obviously, I think, maybe outperformed expectations and posted really nice rice strong gross margins in in the fiscal third quarter that's related effectively just to the timing of some of your uh of when you're paying for components and the point is your fiscal fourth quarter might seem some more pressure because you're paying up for components for amp um is that the right way to think about it i just want to make sure and then that's it for me thanks so much
spk05: Yeah, that's exactly the right way to think about it. We are reconfirming and actually narrowing the range on gross margin, gross margins within the guidance that we put up last quarter in terms of where we thought we would land the year. It's still within our long-term targets, but you see a pretty big difference between Q3 and Q4. And that difference between Q3 and Q4 really is about that timing of when we take the extra charges on some of that you know, components bought by inventory that we, you know, built. And, again, it's not entirely on AMP, but a lot of it can be attributed to AMP and getting back in stock on that.
spk09: Okay. Thank you so much, guys.
spk01: Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Tom Fort with DA Davidson. Your line is now open.
spk07: Great. Thanks. A couple of quick follow-ups from me. So in the fresh release, you talked about delaying your long-term financial targets. Can you give any color on what that means and what delaying means?
spk08: Yeah, Tom, it's Patrick. We believe that those targets are the right ones to be shooting for. You can see that we've proven time and time again to be in that gross margin range. So we're very comfortable in terms of the way that we've Delivered and continue to deliver on that. We've been in the adjusted EBITDA range there and believe it's very attainable given the way that we manage the business and the way we think about the future. And this is really a matter of the macroeconomic headwinds hitting in such a way that we think it'll just take a little longer to get to that level. $2.5 billion. And so, you know, as the macroeconomic headwinds start to ease, we'll certainly put more color around it as we see that.
Disclaimer

This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.

-

-