This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
11/6/2025
third quarter 2025 results conference call. I will now turn the call over to Therese Wilke, Senior Director of Investor Relations for Strategic Education. Mrs. Wilke, please go ahead.
Thank you. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Strategic Education's conference call in which we will discuss third quarter 2025 results. With us today are Robert Silverman, Chairman, Carl McDonald, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Daniel Jackson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Following today's remarks, we will open the call for questions. Please note that this call may include forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements are based on current expectations and are subject to a number of assumptions, uncertainties, and risks that strategic education has identified in today's press release that could cause actual results to differ materially. Further information about these and other relevant uncertainties may be found in strategic education's most recent annual report on Form 10-K, the 10-Q to be filed, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as strategic education's future A-Ks, 10-Qs, and 10-Ks. Copies of these filings and the full press release are available for viewing on the website at strategiceducation.com. And now I'd like to turn the call over to Carl. Carl, please go ahead.
Thank you, Therese, and good morning, everyone. We are pleased with our third quarter results, especially the sustained strength in our education, technology, and services segment, supported by strong growth at Sophia and Workforce Edge. On an adjusted constant currency basis, SEI's revenue rose 5% from the previous year. We continue to advance our efforts to leverage technology, resulting in operating expense growth of less than 1%, operating income growth of 39%, and a 400 basis point margin expansion. We did incur restructuring costs in the third quarter related to our ongoing productivity initiatives. which accounted for most of the difference between our GAAP and our adjusted results in the third quarter. Adjusted earnings were $1.64 compared to $1.16 from the prior year, an increase of 41%. Turning now to our segments. Our Education Technology Services Division generated continued strong growth during the quarter, with revenue and operating income increasing by 46% and 48% from the prior year, to $38 million and $16 million, respectively. And notwithstanding our continued strong investment in ETS, which included a 44% increase in expenses, ETS's operating margin increased slightly on a year-over-year basis to 41.7%. Sophia Learning, our direct-to-consumer portal that offers high-quality college-level courses and has increasingly become a key component of many of our strategic corporate partnerships, grew both average and total subscribers and revenue by 42%, driven by strong growth in both consumer and employer-affiliated subscribers. ETS's share of SEI's operating income continues to grow and now represents one-third of consolidated operating income, reflecting progress with our employer-focused strategy. U.S. higher education total enrollment decreased slightly from the prior year but was more than offset by higher revenue per student, driven by fewer drops, less discounting, and students taking more courses on average. This resulted in revenue growth of 3% from the prior year. Employer-affiliated enrollment once again remained strong, increasing approximately 8% from the prior year and now represents 33% of all U.S. higher education enrollment, an increase of 290 basis points from the prior year. In addition to the strength in our employer-affiliated enrollment, U.S. higher education's healthcare portfolio generated strong total enrollment growth of 7% from the prior year. Healthcare is a critical part of our portfolio, representing half of all U.S. higher education enrollments and almost 40% of enrollment from employer partners. Recently, we commissioned a survey in partnership with the Harris Poll, which highlights the ongoing burnout facing the healthcare workforce and the projected shortfall of clinical health care workers. This research emphasizes the importance of investing in employees' growth and making continuous education a key part of strategies to retain talent. Full survey results can be found on our website at strategiceducation.com. U.S. higher education operating expenses decreased by $6 million from the prior year, or a reduction of 3%. As a result, US higher education operating income almost doubled from the prior year to $23 million, and its operating margin increased 520 basis points. Turning now to our Australia and New Zealand segment, ANZ's third quarter total enrollment decreased 2% from the prior year, driven by the continued regulatory restrictions on international student enrollment. Using constant currency, revenue decreased 2% to $70 million, and operating income decreased from $15 million in the prior year to $13 million this year. Notwithstanding the decline in total international enrollment, we are encouraged by the continued progress with domestic enrollment growth and recent guidance from the Australian government that our international caps will increase 3% in 2026. Finally, regarding capital allocation, in addition to our regular quarterly dividend, We repurchased approximately 429,000 shares during the quarter for a total of $34 million. As of the end of the third quarter, we have repurchased over 1.1 million shares for $94 million, leaving us with 134 million remaining on our share repurchase authorization through the end of this year. And finally, as always, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank all of my colleagues here at SEI for their ongoing commitment and support to our students and our employer partners. And with that, Cherie, we'd be happy to take questions.
Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star 1-1 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, press star 1-1 again. One moment while we compile the Q&A roster. And our first question will come from the line of Jasper Bibb with Truist Securities. Your line is open.
Good morning, everyone. Wanted to ask two on U.S. to start. I guess first, what's the healthy revenue per student gain in the quarter, and what should we expect on our revenue per student base over the next few quarters? And then second, a lot better margin than we anticipated in the U.S. too, just hoping to get a bit more detail on the expense reductions there.
Hey Jasper, it's Dan. On the revenue per student, Carl mentioned lower drops and higher seats per student. It was also some lower discounts, and I think we'll see some benefit from that through the balance of the year. So there'll be some upside on revenue per student at U.S. Higher Ed.
And on margin, Jasper, we've said before we're in the midst of a pretty aggressive productivity initiative that's designed to essentially remake our entire expense base. We've got, through technology and artificial intelligence, intelligence notably. We've got six different categories that touch all parts of the organization. Our expectation is that we'll probably be able to save upwards of $100 million in operating expenses by the end of 27. Okay.
No, that's great. Could you maybe frame where you're at on that journey to $100 million in annual operating expenses, and is that only coming out of the U.S. business, or that's company-wide?
It's company-wide. In my prepared remarks, I referenced a restructuring that we completed at the end of the second quarter, beginning of the third quarter, on a run rate basis that equated to probably $30 million of expense reduction. So I'd say there's another $70 million or so over the next two and a half years. Some of that we're going to reinvest as growth capital to continue to support the various businesses, and some of it will show up as increased margins.
Okay, that's great. For U.S., could you maybe frame the relative growth rates for Strayer and Capella at this point? And could you talk about how you're managing each of those businesses in the context of trying to get back to mid-single-digit enrollment growth at the segment level? It sounds like you might already be at mid-single-digit for Capella and Strayer is declining. Is that accurate?
I'd say that Capella has been stronger. The weakness that we've seen at Strayer is primarily attributable, as it has been in prior cycles, to a reduction in non-affiliated students, but it's also a function of just frankly more efficient marketing dollars at Capella. So we're not fixated on spending a set amount at both Strayer and Capella. We tell the U.S. higher education management team, solve for whatever is going to result in the overall highest growth for U.S. higher education as a division. And over the last 18 months or so, that's been much more effective at Capella. So we've worked to grow Capella at a higher rate of growth than Strayer, and we're seeing that in the performance that's playing out.
Thanks. I wanted to ask about Australia and New Zealand, encouraging news on the international student caps. Are you still expecting that business to return to total enrollment growth in 2026?
Total enrollment growth, I would like for it to return in 2026. Definitely new student growth in 2026 when we anniversary the caps. It generally takes four to six quarters of new student growth to overcome any declines you've had over the preceding four to six quarters. So getting to total enrollment growth by the end of 26 would be a little bit of a stretch goal, but I would definitely expect new student growth beginning in the first part of 26.
Okay, got it. Maybe I misremembered the comment from the last call. Last one for me, as you see it today, do you think the 26 for the company level would align with the notional framework you outlined a few years ago at the investor desk?
Yeah, we are very anchored on our notional model. Nothing that I see now at either the revenue line or the expense line, which we obviously control, leads me to believe that we won't be able to hit the targets that we laid out at our investor day.
Great. Thank you for taking the questions, guys. Thanks.
Thank you. As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, please press star 1-1. Our next question will come from the line of Jeff Silber with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Thanks so much. I wanted to start with Australia and New Zealand. I know many folks on the line don't necessarily follow what's going on on a daily basis. Can you just remind us exactly what has happened, what the changes were compared to what we thought might have happened a few months ago?
Well, the change from when we bought it is that the Australian government has put in place hard enrollment caps for international students. And in our case, that resulted in a reduction of approximately 30% from what we had when there were no caps. And international students, historically, at Torrens represented about half of any new student cohort that we had. The change that we didn't further anticipate that happened at the beginning of this year is the government went further and put much more tighter controls and restrictions on the ability of an international student who already has a visa and who is already in Australia from transferring to another institution which frankly was the source of most of the growth that we had at Torrens because it's a very common practice in Australia for universities to charge a pretty significant tuition premium for international students and we at Torrens effectively have tuition parity between international and domestic students so there was a strong incentive for students to enroll at Torrens because they were going to save a significant amount of money. The change is that we, Torrens, have to essentially vet any transfer student the same way you would as somebody coming in offshore when they're just applying for Visa. So you have to vet things like the amount of finances that they have onshore. You have to bet their ability to return back to their country and their willingness to return back to their country when they're done with the studies. It's a significant headwind. And the product of that headwind is that far fewer students are transferring. But regardless, whether it's the offshore students coming in for the first time or the international transfer students, we're going to anniversary these caps mid-26. We've seen pretty strong domestic new student enrollment growth throughout 25. So when I was answering Jasper's question, I expect that we'll be growing new students in 2026, and hopefully that will translate into total enrollment growth by the end of 2026. But by the time we fully anniversary these restrictions heading into 2027, we expect that business to be growing.
Okay, that's really helpful. Appreciate it. Why don't I move back to U.S. higher education, and I appreciate you guys calling out your health care exposure. Can you just remind us, I know there seems to be some concern on the street between what they call pre-licensure and post-licensure programs. Can you just remind us of the exposure in those two buses?
We are not in the pre-licensure field in nursing. We are in the post-licensure with the RN to BSN program, and that's a FlexPath program, which is the largest program at Capella. And we've seen, I'd say, a little softness in that program. They are into BSN throughout 2025. But we further believe that we're advantaged because that's also our largest program from an employer-affiliated enrollment standpoint. And as I've said in my prepared remarks, that part of our business remains strong.
Okay, great. And just one more. I know also there's some concern on the government shutdown specifically regarding those companies that might have exposure to military and veteran students. Can you talk about any potential impact you've seen and what you think the impact might be going forward?
Thanks. To my knowledge, we haven't seen any impact. And when I think about our largest clients like CVS Health or Best Buy or Dollar General, they're not really impacted by the government shutdown per se. So As of yet, Jeff, we haven't seen any adverse impact.
Jeff, this is Dan. We have very few direct military students, so the exposure there is really insignificant.
Okay. I appreciate the call. Thanks so much. Okay. Thank you.
Thank you. I'm showing no further questions in the queue at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Mr. Carl McDonald for any closing remarks.
Thank you, everyone, and we look forward to joining you in February to discuss our fourth quarter and full year results.
This concludes today's program. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.
