This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
10/22/2021
Good morning, and welcome to the Seagate Technology Fiscal First Quarter 2022 Financial Results Conference Call. My name is Julianne, and I will be your coordinator for today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following the prepared remarks, there will be a question and answer session. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Shanie Hudson, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Treasury. Please proceed, Shanie.
Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to today's call. Joining me are Dave Mosley, Seagate's Chief Executive Officer, and Gianluca Romano, our Chief Financial Officer. We've posted our earnings press release and detailed supplemental information for our September quarter fiscal 2022 on the investor section of our website. During today's call, we'll refer to GAAP and non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP figures are reconciled to GAAP figures in the earnings press release posted on our website and included in our Form 8K that was filed with the SEC. We've not reconciled certain non-GAAP outlook measures because material items that may impact these measures are out of our control or cannot be reasonably predicted. Therefore, a reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP measures is not available without unreasonable effort. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's call contains forward-looking statements, including our December quarter financial outlook and expectations about our financial performance, market demand, industry growth trends, planned product introductions, ability to ramp production, future growth opportunities, possible effects of the economic conditions worldwide resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, and general market conditions. These statements are based on management's current views and assumptions and information available to us as of today and should not be relied upon as of any subsequent date. Actual results may vary materially from today's statements. Information concerning our risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause results to differ from these forward-looking statements are contained in our most recent Form 10-K and 10-Q filed with the SEC our Form 8K filed with the SEC today, and the supplemental information posted on the Investors section of our website. As always, following our prepared remarks, we'll open the call for questions. Let me turn the call over to Dave for opening remarks.
Thank you, Shanie, and hello to everyone joining us on today's call. Seagate had an outstanding start to fiscal 2022, underscored by our September quarter results. Revenue of $3.1 billion was spot on with our expectations and reflects robust growth of 35% year-over-year and 3% above a very strong June quarter. Non-GAAP gross margin expanded to 31%, well inside of our multi-year target range. And non-GAAP operating margin increased to 20.1%, the company's highest level in nearly a decade. Overall, our results reflect record demand for our industry-leading mass capacity products, and solid execution on cost reduction plans and our ongoing focus of balancing supply with demand. We are confident in our ability to deliver excellent results for the fiscal year. And based on our current view, we are raising our fiscal 2022 revenue growth outlook from the high single digit percentage range to the low double digit range. Further, reflecting on our long term confidence in the business, I'm delighted to announce that our board has once again approved an increase to the quarterly dividend by 4.5%. I've been very proud of our team's ability to post consistent financial results through an industry environment that remains very dynamic. We are seeing a confluence of factors creating inflationary pressures and acute supply chain disruption. These include semiconductor component shortages and freight logistics challenges that are creating cost pressures and impacting critical end product assemblies for certain customers. Notwithstanding these obstacles, underlying demand remains solid for Seagate's products, particularly in the mass capacity market, which is why we maintain a high level of confidence in our fiscal year growth outlook. Revenue from the mass capacity markets exceeded $2 billion for the first time, reflecting broad-based growth across each of the end markets. The cloud is the strongest contributor to the mass capacity markets and Seagate's revenue growth. Ongoing investments to build and equip new data centers have translated into stable, healthy demand for multiple quarters now, and we expect this trend to continue. Over the past five years, the number of hyperscale data centers has more than doubled to nearly 600 worldwide, with approximately 200 more on the way. Many of these planned data centers are being built by large cloud customers, but the timing of their investments and infrastructure build-out is not synchronized, which supports a more stable long-term growth outlook for hyperscale investment. CK's high-capacity drives are essential to the world's largest data centers. We have very close relationships with our cloud customers to ensure our manufacturing and technology roadmaps continue to enable their investment plans and performance requirements at a favorable total cost of ownership. In the enterprise and OEM markets, we achieved a fourth consecutive quarter of sales growth, supported by increasing IT hardware spending. Over the near term, the broader supply constraints that I've highlighted may delay some of our customers' new product builds due to non-HDD shortages. However, based on customer conversations, we believe any pause would be temporary until shortages are alleviated. Demand for video and image applications increased significantly during the quarter, supported in part by a broadening of use cases that extend beyond traditional security and surveillance applications. The combination of high-definition cameras and data analytics enabling productivity gains, cost savings, and revenue generation opportunities are actually driving adoption by a wide range of industries, including retail, manufacturing, and healthcare. High-capacity HDDs play a crucial role in helping businesses economically manage and extract value from an ever-increasing growth in data across a more distributed enterprise. Without question, the HDD industry is being driven by long-term secular demand for mass capacity storage, a market that we expect to more than double by calendar 2026 to $26 billion. And Seagate is well equipped to answer the call. We continue to leverage our strong arsenal of innovative technologies, manufacturing agility, and industry expertise to deliver attractive total cost of ownership solutions aligned with our customer's roadmap. Our common platform approach illustrates these points well. We have been able to seamlessly transition from 16 to 18 terabyte drives and are now offering multiple varieties of 20 terabyte drives to meet the breadth of customer demand. We began ramping 20 terabyte products in the September quarter, and I'm thrilled with the strong customer interest. I'm equally excited by customer reception for our Mach 2 dual actuator drives, which are now shipping at large scale. As we were anticipating a few months ago, we are seeing greater adoption of our Mach 2 drives for core and edge applications that benefit from the read and write performance gains that we deliver with these products. We expect dual actuator drives to become more mainstream as capacities increase beyond 30 terabytes to support both cost and performance requirements. I'm also confident in achieving 30 terabyte capacities and beyond. We continue to execute our research and development roadmaps and have recently achieved great hammer test results in staging aerial density growth that supports future product launches. Based on these demonstrations, our product development plans are on track. But our product introduction strategy has not changed. We will leverage Hammer's aerial density gains to offer customers step function capacity increases that deliver a strong TCO proposition and enhance value for both our customers and Seagate. Our focus on total customer experience is top of mind for the live cloud business. Our simple, secure, and cost-efficient mass data storage as a service platform is resonating well among customers, particularly for backup solutions. Today, Live Cloud is certified with the majority of the vendors identified by Gartner as magic quadrant leaders for enterprise backup and recovery software. This quarter, we announced a multi-year deal with a leading video communications provider. I am excited by this partnership and recognize the trust all of our live customers are placing in Seagate. We will continue to be deliberate in scaling infrastructure and developing an ecosystem to ensure that we delight our customers. Wrapping up, Seagate continues to deliver consistent financial results underpinned by strong operational discipline, focus on profitability, and growing demand for mass capacity storage. We believe these trends reflect the healthy structural changes that have taken place in the industry in recent years. Seagate is poised to benefit with our technology leadership position and strong track record of execution. I'll now hand the call to Gianluca to cover the financial results.
Thank you, Dave. Our September quarter results Highlighted solid growth across nearly all financial metrics and demonstrate significant discipline execution and ongoing focus on driving profitability and free cash flow generation. Revenue was $3.12 billion, up 3% sequentially. Non-GAAP operating margin expanded to 20.1% of revenue, up 200 basis points, quarter over quarter. And non-GAAP EPS was $2.35, up 18% sequentially, and at the high end of our guidance range. We grew total hard disk drive revenue to 2.9 billion, up 5% sequentially and 34% year-over-year. HDD capacity shipment increased 4% sequentially to 159 exabytes, up 39% relative to the prior year period. Growth was driven by increasing demand for our mass capacity products. which contributed 71% of total HDD revenue and 83% of HDD extra by shipment. Revenue from the mass capacity market increased to $2 billion, supported by growth across each of the underlying end markets, which include Nearline, VIA, and NAS products. Mass capacity revenue was up 8% sequentially and up 51% compared with the prior year period. while capacity shipments into this market were up 7% sequentially and 53% year-over-year. Based on our current outlook, we expect mass capacity extra buy shipments to remain strong in the December quarter, with calendar year 21 annual growth slightly above our long-term CAGR forecast of about 35%. In the September quarter, near-line revenue demands was driven by improving enterprise spending and healthy growth from cloud data center customers. Nearline shipments total 106 exabytes, up 5% sequentially and 65% year-on-year, reflecting demand for our high-capacity drives, strong growth for dual actuator drives, and ongoing market momentum for our common platform product, spanning 16 through 20 terabyte drives. The vast demand in the VM market led to sequential revenue growth that was above the average for the mass capacity market, and we expect solid demand to continue in the December quarter. The legacy market made up the remaining 29% of HDD revenue, holding relatively stable at $831 million, down 3% sequentially and up 5% year over year, improving enterprise demand boosted sales for mission-critical drives, which partially offset a decline in consumer drives following a strong June quarter. We are starting to see a moderation in the face of annual revenue decline following the significant market disruption brought on by the pandemic. While we could see some fluctuation in a given quarter, we believe the most pronounced impacts are behind us. Finally, Turning to our non-HDD business, revenue came in at $151 million, down 9% sequentially off record June quarter level. Our system business has been partially impacted by some of the supply constraints that Dave discussed. We are working closely with our suppliers to mitigate risk, and we continue to gain new customer wins to support longer-term growth in the business. Overall, strong demand trends combined with positive industry dynamics led to non-GAAP gross profit of $965 million in the September quarter, up 8% sequentially and 57% year-over-year. Costs relating to freight and logistics are continuing to increment higher. While we will continue to take steps to reduce the impact of these costs, we believe that we remain a headwind to the business through the fiscal year. Our resulting non-GAAP gross margin expanded by about 140 basis points to 31%, well inside our long-term target range of 30% to 33%, including higher freight and logistic costs and component prices. HDD margins are now in the upper half of the range, reflecting better alignment in supply and demand and the transition to higher capacity drives. we anticipate continued solid gross margin performance with opportunity to increment higher as we ramp our cost-optimized products. Additionally, as COVID cost headwinds abate, we would expect margins to expand into the upper half of our target range over time. Non-GAAP operating expenses decreased to $339 million, reflecting certain one-time savings. Discipline expense management combined with higher revenue and margin expansion, resulted in non-GAAP operating income of $627 million, up 15% sequentially, and more than doubled the year ago period. Non-GAAP operating margin expanded to 20.1%, which is the top end of our long-term target range of 15% to 20% of revenue. Importantly, The September performance demonstrated our ability to grow profits faster than revenue, supporting our strategy of long-term value creation. Based on diluted share count of approximately 231 million shares, non-GAAP EPS for the September quarter was $2.35, the highest level in close to a decade. With an inventory relatively flat, today's inventory outstanding at 50 days. We are working with suppliers and managing strategic inventory levels to mitigate risk to the business while we continue to monitor this dynamic situation. Capital expenditures were $117 million for the quarter. We currently expect fiscal year capex to be at the low end of our long-term target range of 4% to 6% of revenue, which is sufficient to support our future product roadmap while maintaining expense discipline. Free cash flow generation increased to $379 million, up 7% quarter over quarter and more than double year over year. We delivered strong performance in the September quarter and expect to improve free cash flow generation through the fiscal year, enabling us to fund our growth opportunity and return capital to our shareholders. We used $153 million fund the quarterly dividend and $425 million to repurchase 4.9 million ordinary shares, exiting the quarter with 225 million shares outstanding and approximately $3.8 billion remaining in our authorization. As Dave mentioned earlier, the Board approved a $0.03 increase to our quarterly dividend, raising the quarterly payout to $0.70 per share. We ended the September quarter with cash and cash equivalents of nearly $1 billion and total liquidity was approximately $2.7 billion, including our revolving credit facility. Adjusted EBITDA was $724 million for the quarter and $2.4 billion for the 12-month period ending in September. Total debt balance at the end of the quarter was $5.1 billion with a leverage ratio of 2.2 times. In early October, we took advantage of the current attractive market environment to raise $725 million in capital through a new $600 million six-year term loan and upsized our existing term loan during fiscal 2026. These actions are consistent with our growing business and provide the opportunity to repay $230 million in debt coming due in March. We reduced our average interest rate by 25 basis points and expect interest expenses for the December quarter to be approximately $66 million. Looking ahead to our outlook for the December quarter, we anticipate a continuation of the strong demand environment that we experienced in the September quarter. We expect revenue to be in a range of $3.1 billion plus or minus $150 million. We expect non-GAAP operating margin to remain around the top end of our long-term range of 15% to 20% of revenue. And we expect non-GAAP EPS to be in the range of $2.35 plus or minus $0.15. In summary, we had an outstanding September quarter, placing us on solid footing to deliver strong top and bottom line growth in calendar year 2021, as well as fiscal 2022. I will now turn the call back to Dave for final comments.
Thanks, Gianluca. Fiscal 2022 is off to a tremendous start, and I feel positive about the current healthy demand environment, which is reflected in our increased revenue growth outlook for the fiscal year. I'm equally bullish on Seagate's longer-term growth opportunities supported by secular demand for mass capacity storage. Our mass capacity innovation roadmap puts Seagate in excellent position to thrive in this environment. and continue to deliver revenue growth beyond fiscal 2022 in line with our long-term target of 3% to 6%. We are in the right place with the right technology and innovative customers with whom we are partnering closely to enable their roadmaps. Further, our robust capital returns program, including today's dividend increase, round out what we believe is a compelling investment story. With the UN Climate Change Conference scheduled to begin in less than two weeks, I wanted to highlight CEH's commitment to ESG. Starting in fiscal 2022, we've incorporated sustainability into our executive's long-term compensation plan based on the achievement of specific quantitative environmental and social targets. Our environmental goal is linked with established plans to reduce the company's carbon footprint in support of achieving our science-based targets. From harnessing renewables at our California and Northern Ireland campuses to installing solar capacity at our facilities in Thailand, Seagate continues to put our commitment to the planet into action. We have also incorporated an executive compensation goal to increase gender diversity in our leadership as we strive to cultivate a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplace. For a third consecutive year, Seagate is among best companies for women, according to social media platform Fairy Godboss, as well as one of the best places to work for LGBTQ plus equality by the Human Rights Campaign. In closing, I'd like to thank the Seagate team for their tireless efforts, our customers and suppliers for their continued support, and our shareholders for placing their trust in Seagate. Gianluca and I are now happy to take your questions.
Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question will come from Carl Ackerman from Cowan & Company. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Yes, thank you. I have two questions, please, one for Dave and one for John Luca. Dave, it's great. It's great to see that over two-thirds of your business has now transitioned away from consumer toward enterprise. you know, as you know, which tends to be higher margin, yet influenced by data center CapEx. There have been some recent concern by investors that cloud spending will moderate after being robust the last six quarters. So I was hoping, you know, you could discuss how you see the demand trajectory playing out for Nearline, both in the December quarter and also into the second half of fiscal 2022. Thank you.
Yeah, thanks for the question, Carl. And I think if you have another one, you can follow up with John Luke as well. You know, the way I look at it – oh, sorry, go ahead.
Sorry, I was going to say, from my second one, then, Dave, the improvement in your profitability has been impressive. And our own checks indicate you have been successful in passing along these rising input costs. Some investors have been hearing that margins might moderate as antiprices also moderate, but I was hoping you might discuss why that might not be the case with high-capacity offerings and what initiatives you have at your disposal to support profitability regardless of demand.
Thank you. Okay, good. Yeah, thanks. So John Locke will catch that. Relative to cloud, the demand has been steady now since the beginning of calendar 20, so As we talked about in the prepared remarks, there's a broadening of the customer base, not just a few hyperscalers that's actually benefiting us tremendously, as well as the product transitions that we've talked about, the higher and higher capacity points, which have a better TCO proposition for the end customer as well. I think these macro trends, whether it's digitization, AI, multi-cloud, the move to the cloud, we're all accelerated tremendously during the pandemic, you know, work from home and all the other things that cause people to push into the cloud. Not all these cloud customers are all synced up, but we think the demand picture right now is an aggregate of all of that behavior. And, you know, we, at the same time, we've had longer product cycles. So we have great visibility. We have strategic, you know, long-term agreements. We're showing people what we can do two, three, four quarters out, and then we're asking them what exactly they need. And I think the economics play is happening now, you know, well that way. And I think that's why we're seeing the kind of stabilization that we are and why we can, you know, reinforce the fact that the back half of this fiscal year and even into the next fiscal year, we'll continue to maximize growth and be able to turn that into revenue. Gianluca, do you want to?
Yeah, on the profitability question. I would say we are executing well on our plan. We discussed a few quarters ago how we could improve our profitability quarter after quarter. Even in the last quarter we improved our gross margin by 140 basis points and we are at the top of the operating margin range. So we are happy with the performance, but of course we are always looking at opportunity for improvement. As we were saying in the prepared remarks, there are some costs that are increasing and we are looking into that, how to moderate that impact and continue to improve our gross margin and operating margin in the next few quarters. We are positive that we continue that trajectory and demand is strong. This is helping. When we have a good alignment between supply and demand, usually we come out with a good So we are happy with the situation.
Thanks, Carl.
Your next question comes from Wamsi Mohan from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Yes, thank you. Congrats on the strong results and outlook. I have two as well. You're returning cash, well, about 100% of free cash flow, and you just raised your dividend as well. I know you spoke about a very strong capital return program at your analyst earlier. Just wondering, as you're thinking about the outlook here, anything that has changed in the market from a pricing or demand standpoint that is sort of bolstering the confidence? And secondly, last night Intel spoke about China cloud slowdown given regulatory pressures over there. Are you seeing any of that, and is that contemplated in your raised fiscal year guide? Thank you.
Thanks, Monty. I think it's part and parcel with Carl's question. There's both of your questions kind of tie back to that same visibility that we have. So, yes, we do have a longstanding track record of returning cash to shareholders, and we remain committed to the dividend. As a matter of fact, we upped it for the third time in a row, third year in a row. That is really confidence in our long-term pre-cash flow generation, and that gets into our Like John was just saying, our bouncing supply and demand against the growth of data that's out there in the world. So we'll continue to be opportunistic on share buybacks. And you can look at the track record over the last 10 years or the last 10 quarters of the company. You can see who we are relative to returns. We continue to budget. So we'll look at investing in ourselves. We'll focus on optimizing the use of our capital to generate the best value we can over the long term. and we've been pretty good stewards of cash even in the tough times that happened in the pandemic, so I'm pretty confident in that. Relative to China and the cloud slowdown, I would say there's a couple things. We have good customer relationships, and therefore we get out in front of the 16s and 18s and 20 terabytes that they're going to need, and that's the same kind of question that Carl asked. I think also that The way I see it is not all infrastructure investments that people are making sync up necessarily when it comes to memory and compute and networking and storage. And so you may make one type of investment for a while and then pivot to another type of investment against a overall strong investment thesis that's going on in the cloud. So I think that may explain why certain people see different things over the next two or three quarters. And we don't really... We don't see any inventory buildup substantial. We see that people, when they need the disk drives to actually populate the data centers and get that mass capacity storage online, we see that trend quite far out, and the customers are being very predictable on it. So that kind of explains our confidence. We don't really see the slowdown in exabyte growth at all.
Thanks, Dave.
Yeah, thanks, Moseley.
Your next question comes from Timothy Arcuri from UBS. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Timothy Arcuri Hi. Thanks a lot. I had a question about capex discipline and supply-demand balance. There's been a lot of structural changes in the industry that seem like they could be pretty significant longer-term margin tailwinds in some ways, maybe similar to what's happened in DRAM. And I guess my question is, as we sort of enter a new cycle of CapEx, how do you ensure CapEx discipline? And how do you think about that in the context of overall supply-demand balance? I mean, the old axiom is that it only takes one supplier to sort of tip the apple cart. So I'm wondering if you can talk about CapEx discipline things.
Yeah, thanks, Tim. I mean, it is good to reflect back on where we've come from. So I look at the peak of client-server, the drive types that we're making typically had one disk and two heads in them, and there were a lot of those drives. So our factories were very focused on flexibility, back-end capacity for notebook drives, for example. And now that we have mass capacity drives that have a lot of disks and a lot of heads in them, it's much more like a semiconductor process. I mean, there's significant differences in the processes themselves, but the lead times for wafer are quite long, quite specialized for us, and that's where a lot of the CapEx is actually being deployed now. That pivot has happened over the last 10 years. We're now fully enjoined, as you can see from our numbers, in heads and media investment land, not in drive, not having over capacity for drive anymore. You know, we talked about strong secular demand for mass capacity storage going all the way through 26. It'll keep going after that, of course. We pegged the TAM at $26 billion five years from now. We are trying to balance supply and demand against that. And I think, you know, exactly to your question, the governors are the lead times for wafer and also the lead times for the capital equipment to actually increase. as long as we continue to make the smart investments, we should be able to keep supply and demand in balance. And, you know, you could read that as a form of our CapEx discipline. You know, obviously, if we see, for example, on the hammer transition, we want to accelerate it all, we can invest a little bit more. We have, you know, a lot of cash to be able to do that. But, you know, we'll continue to really watch that supply and demand balance well and deploy like that. And we're working – a lot with the customers on their specific needs. That's why I talked about the LTAs when Carl asked his question. So we know what roughly the build-outs are going to happen over time, so we can do that very judiciously.
Yeah, Tim, on the CapEx, we have a guidance range of 4% to 6% of revenue. We have also said that for this year, we will be probably in the low part of that range. We are fairly happy with the supply and demand alignment at this point and the utilization of our factories. And, of course, we want to keep this good alignment for the future.
Thanks a lot. I guess as my follow-up, can you talk about channel inventory? Where does channel stand at this point? And did your pricing and your mass capacity segment, did that benefit at all from channel refill in the third quarter, calendar third quarter? Thanks.
I think, simply put, the answer is no. We have multiple channels. Of course, in this case, we're talking about distribution channel, largely for legacy products. There's some small channel for mass capacity, but I think a lot of people are focused on legacy products. We love those legacy products. We love the customers there. We're not really investing there. We make sure that we keep those channel inventories properly balanced. The the swings that we might have seen, say, two quarters ago due to cryptocurrency or something like that, that re-equilibrated very, very quickly. And it doesn't impact the mass capacity channels at all. So from my perspective, all the inventory levels that we have are quite good. Inside Seagate, our inventory actually went down quite a bit, and that's a function of kind of how tough it is to manage supply and demand right now because the end customers are having trouble getting the right parts. And what we want to make sure we do is don't push too much into some of those temporary problems that they might have as they're trying to build the final kits. That doesn't help us, I think, to your point of long-term economics and industry structure and things like that. So We have to make sure that we balance our supply and demand, even tactically, really well, and I think we're doing a good job of it.
Thanks a lot.
Our next question comes from Patrick Ho from Stiefel. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Thank you very much, Anne. Congrats on the nice quarter and outlook. Dave, maybe first a big-picture question. It was really encouraging to hear about the efforts on the multi-aturated drive, the Mach 2. I just wanted to get a little more color on the hammer side of things. You mentioned the progress there. That continues to be on track. But can you talk about, I guess, customer discussions and when you believe the inflection point will be when customers transition over to the hammer drives?
Yeah, thanks for the question, Patrick. I think I'm glad you took away the optimism. The team's definitely feeling it with the results that we have. These are not just science projects anymore. This is product development, full-blown product development now. And, you know, we've talked a lot about Hammer in the past. We've built a lot of parts. We've given drives to customers. They can see how those drives will behave in their infrastructures. And we're locked in with customers talking to them specifically about even the recent results that we have. But just to be super clear, you know, Hammer's really the pathway to get to 30 terabytes and beyond. And we are very confident about that right now. And we express that in the prepared remarks. There's a lot of things we have to get together on so that you've got the manufacturing capability. There's other parts of the recording chain that we have to make work. The, you know, the readback process of Hammer's usually about writing, get the media right. Hammer enables, Hammer actually starts from a new material set in the disc. the ability to write dense bits comes from the media technologies that you're actually using. So we have to get all that right as well. But we're super encouraged by the results. And, you know, I think the best way to say this, I think the industry probably hasn't done a great job of making things really clear, but I think the best way to say it is that we are feeling confident in capacity points not only at 20 and 22 and 23 and 24 and things like that, but significantly higher than that based on what we're seeing right now. And we are working really hard to make sure we get that done. Our customers know it. They've seen samples of that, and we're going to continue to race to get there. I don't want to really announce any new products just yet, but we'll let you know when they come.
Great. That's helpful. And maybe as my follow-up for you, Luca, Obviously, your results highlighted strong execution, and given the supply constraints that are in the industry today, again, the results were really strong. I was just wondering, in terms of your Malaysia operations and just some of the labor constraints, are you seeing that abating right now? And how did you manage through the September quarter, given that there were some issues on that front in the country itself with COVID? You know, what efforts did you take to, you know, continue to deliver the strong results you delivered in September and the outlook for December?
Yeah. I would say, you know, first of all, thank you for the congratulations. I think the quarter actually came out a little bit better than how we got it at the beginning, but in terms of revenue, it's very well aligned, and the profitability is a bit better. I would say in terms of the legacy part of the business, right now we are seeing a better trend compared to maybe a year ago, two years ago. Of course, not all the segments are the same inside legacy. In the last quarter, sequentially, consumer was a little bit down compared to June. June was an extraordinary quarter for the consumer business. Now we see consumer coming back fairly strong in December. But at the same time, we see compute a little bit weak. So it's always difficult to look into all the details. But again, we see a better trend. And also when you look at the volume, not only the revenue, we think in the future you will see maybe some more reduction and then a good stabilization of the business. And Dave, you want to add something?
Yeah, Patrick, just your comment about supply chains being disrupted. People, supply chains are all about people after all. It's about making people safe, safe to come to work, safe at home, the neighborhood around. We've been working very hard on that with our employees and our suppliers and customers. And I think everyone has the right perspective on this up through the supply chain. And there have been challenges indeed, like you said. But I think we're managing through them pretty well. People want their factories to run as well. They have an economic incentive to do that. So we all have to stay in touch with each other or treat each other right and make sure we're managing for the long haul, certainly at the scale at which we need out of our supply chain.
Thank you.
Thank you. Thanks, Petra.
Your next question comes from Katie Huberty from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Thank you Dave just given it's such an important driver of gross margins, can you talk about what percentage of mass capacity is now coming from the common platform drives and. Where you think that revenue mix might exit the year and how the margins differ for the common platform drives versus the rest of the mass capacity portfolio that have a follow up.
Yeah, thanks, Katie. I don't know that I know the number off the top of my head, actually. We, you know, so the common platform being 16, 18s, and 20, there are some 14s and things like that in there as well. We also have the mid-cap near-line drives that are very strong performers right now, and we've just done a product refresh on, which is actually, you know, going to help us as well. So what I would say is that we continue to take costs out of the the common platform, right? So even as we transition from 18s to 20s, there are ways that we can take cost out of new components that are in there, and we continue to amortize over the tooling set for what we've already installed. So all those things are serving us really well from a margin perspective.
Yes, Katie, we said that 83% of the exabyte volume is in mass capacity right now, and I would say the majority of that volume is from the common platform.
Okay, great. And John Luca, three months ago you talked about gross margins improving every quarter of this year, even with some expected seasonality as you go into the back half of fiscal 22. Can you just talk about how, if at all, those assumptions have changed? Obviously, you're coming from a very impressive gross margin performance in September, so You're starting from a higher base, but just any update as to whether we should be modeling gross margin improvement every quarter and how you're thinking about revenue seasonality as you go into the March and June quarter. Thank you.
Yes. I would say probably compared to what we were discussing three months ago or six months ago, I see the COVID cost a little bit higher than what we were expecting, in particular for freight and logistics. At the same time, demand is maybe a little bit stronger, so our utilization rate is really good. This is helping our unit cost to decrease quarter after quarter. So until we can keep this good alignment between supply and demand, I'm fairly confident we can do further improvement in the gross margin, as we were discussing. And I know every quarter is a bit different, so it's difficult to be very precise for the next few quarters, but we are confident we can do some more progress in the marginality.
Yeah, I think, Katie, the demand is obviously the main driver of what's happening, and we see that persisting. We go well through... back half of this fiscal year and even into the next fiscal year the exabyte trends continue really well um i think you know tactically what's going on with some of the costs or freight logistics things even if a customer said i want to do a swap in three weeks at the end of a quarter might be really hard to get them the product you know given where we are um but none of that's really going to contribute to any demand destruction so you know demand is a front-end driver for us then You know, we think that that's the story we want. And the other thing I would say is that we believe that right now that as we get out into Q3 that, you know, there's some lulls at the end of the year and Chinese New Year and things we typically see that should allow some people to start rebuilding their positions in supply chain. So, you know, that's yet another reason why we're confident.
Great. Thank you. Congrats on the quarter.
Your next question comes from Tashia Hari from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking the question and congrats on the strong execution. I wanted to follow up on your fiscal 22 revenue guide. I guess now low double digit growth relative to fiscal 21. If we take that and your December quarter guide, I think it's pretty clear that implicitly you're assuming a down quarter sequentially in March and or June. I'm just curious what's embedded there. Is it seasonality in your legacy business? Is it something in your line, conservatism, supply chain, all of the above? Any context, any color there would be helpful, and then I've got a quick follow-up.
Yeah, thanks, Tashia. So I think if you go back to last quarter, it would have been seasonality, and it would have been more biased towards the legacy business. Obviously, the VIA markets are seasonal as well. And I would say now it's even more muted seasonality and some of the strength in the exabyte growth that we see in the cloud, particularly at the top end of the mass capacity markets. So that kind of explains what's changed, I think, in the last three months. Yeah.
Yeah, we see the near line still very strong. And, of course, now every quarter we will update on our visibility on the fiscal year.
Got it. That's helpful. And then... Tom Petrie- My follow up is on on the long term model guys and I realized it's only been. Tom Petrie- What is it eight eight months since you since you announced the update and I certainly wouldn't expect you to update your long term model every. Tom Petrie- Every six to nine months, but, but it does look like you know from a gross margin perspective from an operating margin perspective. You know, gross margins, despite all the challenges, you're comfortably in that range. Operating margins, you're guiding to the second consecutive quarter of you guys being at the high end of that range. So I guess my question is, should we be thinking about, you know, a positive bias to what you presented earlier this year? Or, you know, is this kind of as good as it gets and we should expect some sort of normalization or reversion over the coming quarters? Thank you so much.
Thanks. Yes, we've been looking at exactly what you're talking about. I don't think we're prepared to say anything about it today, although I will say that it all is predicated upon supply-demand balance, and demand continues to be strong. When you look back that eight months or nine months or whatever, we were still kind of at the front end of the pandemic. There were a lot of challenges that were going on then that we didn't have great visibility into. So I think the further... time marches along and we see how much data has moved to the cloud and we see how much the edge is growing and all these new business models and things like that, we can look at demand versus our supply picture and see whether we update those models. We'll keep you posted.
I will just add that we are encouraged by the gross margin level that we generate in our mass capacity part of the business. and we need to see how this will continue to develop in the next quarters and in the next fiscal year, but so far we are very confident.
Very helpful. Thank you.
Your next question comes from Ananda Barua from Loop Capital. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Hey, guys. Yeah, thanks for taking the questions. I have two if I could. I guess the first is... Dave, you had mentioned in one of your remarks a little earlier about seeing demand, you know, sort of strength into fiscal year 23. And so I guess really what I'd love to, well, I think we all would love to get from you is, you know, how are you guys thinking and how would you like us to think about, you know, sort of the context of this cycle? You know, does it need to fall off like past cycles have at times? And do you see it extending into, you know, kind of second half of calendar 22, first half of calendar 23? And then I have a follow-up as well. Thanks.
Yeah, I think the fundamental trends for the secular growth, especially in mass capacity cloud, are not changing from my perspective. If you think about it on the 20-terabyte drives, next year late in the year versus you know when people were buying 16 terabytes or 14 terabytes or whatever they were a couple years ago the tco proposition for that and new data center bill that is still big and the replacement cycle is still big you know that that capacity point those matter there's also other feature sets that are coming with these new drives that allow people to manage their data centers in a different way more efficiently for power you know and reliability and all these other things too so you know it's a package that says that you know investments that people are making will be a lot more programmatic. And we're having those kinds of discussions with customers worldwide. So that's what builds strength in our visibility. On the VIA markets as well, I think the application space at the edge is just propagating really quickly. So there's things like retail consumer behavior. There's healthcare, which we all see and you know, can kind of feel how important mass capacity data is there. So there's a lot of edge applications that are just growing every year as well. So that's why we, you know, continue to feel strengthened. And, you know, that's why we put out to the earlier question that Tashia asked, we included that kind of revenue growth in our long-term models.
That's great context and super helpful. And then I guess just one on, you guys have talked sort of lead times you guys have talked in the past on these calls about, you know, sort of what lead times have looked like to get, you know, sort of the highest capacity of the near line drives. I think at some point the implied event, I think in the spring you're saying December. So, you know, kind of six months like that. And so, you know, we'd love to get just an update on what the lead times look like, how long it's taking, taking you to get, get those high cap drives out the door and, And then along with that, a pricing question, you know, when you guys take orders in, the pricing that you guys end up selling the drives at, is it at the point of order taking or is it where the price would be, say, six months from now when you ship it? I would love context around those two. And that's it for me. Thanks.
There's so many different types of customers that I don't think I'll comment on the pricing. But I will say that, you know, your first question was really about how do you know these long-term agreements. And some of it is exactly, you remember the comment I made nine months ago, roughly, which was, hey, if you want something for Christmas, you better tell me now. I mean, that's the kind of lead time we're talking about. We're doing starts in our wafer factory. Right now, for capacity points that are out there in time, and we're saying to people, this is how many roughly we're going to be able to build in that time frame. Let's just make sure our plans are aligned. It's not just about capacity points, though. It's also about all the other things architecturally that they're changing to make sure that we have the best value prop to put into their data center that intercepts that architecture. And so it's a big planning exercise for our customers inside their supply chains. If you wanted one drive, then yes, we have one extra drive laying around. But if you want hundreds of thousands or millions or something, then we need to be talking with a lot of lead time. And I think that's what's bringing the stability to the business. So if that helps you.
Yes, it's very helpful. I appreciate it. Thanks a lot, guys.
Your next question comes from Tom O'Malley from Barclays. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Good morning, guys, and congrats on the nice results. Dave, I want to kind of double-click into the non-HDD business. Obviously, you're raising the full-year guide here. Can you talk about the contribution that the non-HDD business has to that growth rate? What do you see that kind of growing this fiscal year?
Yeah, Tom, thanks. The non-HDD business has been a little choppy. I mean, there's certain places where we can use our brand for continued strength, but there's opportunities, and we take advantage of them, and sometimes those opportunities wax and wane a little bit. I think relative to the profitability of the non-HDD business, it's actually climbing. So we believe we're using our brand appropriately to get some more revenue, and it's not so dilutive as it used to be in the past. And especially on the systems business, you have to be a little bit careful because there's so many more components in such lower volumes than we're accustomed to dealing with in the HDD business that that's where supply chain are a big challenge. And, you know, we still want to bring the same brand proposition to the customers, the same predictability that I just talked about on Ananda's question. So, you know, from a revenue perspective, I think there's more opportunity for us out there, but it's actually challenging to run some of those businesses as well given the supply chain challenges.
Yeah, I would say from a financial standpoint, even if the non-HD business has a lower gross margin, is a very good contributor for our free cash flow, so we are happy in keeping the effort on the non-artist drive business.
That's helpful. And then, Dave, to your point earlier, I just had a follow-up on the systems business. You called it out in your preamble as particularly being impacted by supply chain, and I think you just reiterated that. Could you talk about what products that is? Obviously, these are big, complex machines that you're selling here, systems that you're selling here. Where are the Where are the constraints? Where are you seeing that supply chain hold up? Any kind of particular examples would be helpful.
Yeah, I think all things silicon, all things power, all things, you know, kind of the things that we typically don't control very much are tight. And, you know, I would say it's not only a matter of being able to actually procure something, it's also a matter of getting it through all of the factories that it needs to get to to be, you know, finally consumed for us. That's been the complexity. So we have tried really hard with our systems business over the years to reduce the complexity of our offerings so we can go a little longer on inventory positions and be more flexible for our customers. But it is a challenge right now, as you can well imagine.
Thanks.
Congrats, Kevin.
Thanks.
Your next question comes from Sydney Ho from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Great. Thanks for taking my question. I have two questions too. The first one is on pricing. How would you characterize the current pricing environment? Maybe you can parse out the crypto impact. Also interested in whether you're able to pass on the high cost to your customers. How much of a tailwind is that to your gross margin forecast over the next few quarters?
For the pricing, I would say the pricing environment is still very favorable, similar to the prior quarter, I would say. And we expect this to last even in the current quarter and hopefully even in the future. Passing the cost, I don't think it's so automatic. We negotiate pricing based on demand and the alignment between supply and demand and not too much on passing specific costs to our customers.
Okay, that's fair. Maybe my follow-up question is on the technology role a little bit. Obviously, you're starting to ramp up the 20 terabyte now, but with Hammer not likely being a high volume until it sounds like later, maybe 30 terabyte, how confident are you that you can accomplish the cost reduction improvement you talk about at your analyst day, not just in magnitude, but also within the timeframe you talked about?
Yeah, thanks, Cindy. So, a couple things. It's not always about the highest capacity point. If you think about it, we get to a point where we can take heads and disks out of the lower capacity points. That's a way to introduce margin back into the system as well. And then, you know, then you fundamentally have more capacity that you don't have to install with CapEx, right, because you're being more efficient inside your own factories as well. So, I know a lot – we – do a lot of focus on 30 terabyte capacity points. But there are a lot of opportunities that they can go back and sell 16 terabytes with fewer heads and disks. And that's probably the way to think about the march that we're on towards higher capacity points. It introduces that kind of cost oxygen back into the system for efficiency. If you compare ourselves, again, back to the ancient history of the peak of client-server, when there's one disk and two heads, you needed huge jumps in aerial density to make these cost jumps. You know, when you have eight or nine disks in a box and you can take one out and hit the same capacity point or two out or three out and hit the same capacity point, that's a lot of cost oxygen relatively. And it's easier to transition through. So if that helps you think about it.
Yeah, that's helpful. Thanks.
Yeah, it's helpful. Thanks.
Your next question comes from Aaron Rakers from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Yeah, thanks for letting me ask the questions, and congrats on the quarter. My first question is, you know, back to kind of the capital return strategy. The company's done a phenomenal job returning capital in these past several quarters, but we have seen the net debt position continue to decline. So I guess the question is, is Gene, how do you think about the appropriate level of either liquidity or cash on the balance sheet as we gauge your continued propensity to be active on share repurchase?
I think we discussed this a little bit at our last analyst day, and we said, no, we are comfortable with a liquidity level at least of $2 billion, and this includes, of course, our credit revolvers. So we are still well above that level, and so we have great opportunity. First of all, because we generate very strong free cash flow. We were talking about that before. The last quarter was very good, almost $380 million. We expect free cash flow to continue to improve during the fiscal year. So this will give us opportunity for a further return to our shareholders.
And I think, Aaron, there's a lot of other levers that we have. at our disposal, you see us managing our working capital really well. If you look at our inventory positions against what our final objectives are, you know, that's part of how we get done what we need to get done to maintain the liquidity flexibility that we want. Yep.
And then the quick follow-up, just kind of back on the pricing discussion, maybe a longer-term way of asking it is, you know, the HCD industry is not just kind of concentrated from a competitive landscape, but also now 65% plus, you know, near-line capacity shift and maybe even more concentrated in the competitive dynamics in that vertical. You know, it used to be thought of as kind of like a 10%, maybe 15% price per annum kind of decline, price per gig decline in hard disk drives. Do you think we should think differently about that? Do you think we should think about a much more disciplined flattening out price curve for hard disk drives as we think about the long-term model implications?
I think as drives have changed towards content-rich heads in media, then I think the lead times of your investment are going to be longer. And so, therefore, I think you'll see less fluctuation in supply-demand misalignment. Now, you can still have demand shocks like we saw at the front end of the pandemic, and, you know, there may be other supply shocks as well, but, you know, from my perspective, the the industry is doing a good job of managing supply-demand balance because the process content that's required to make a drive that's a mass capacity drive at the front end of it really has a lot of long lead times and very complex parts. So, you know, I think that's what's changing the behavior, you know, rather than anything else.
Yep. Thank you very much.
Your last question will come from Jim Suva from Citigroup. Please go ahead. Your line is open.
Thank you. And I just have one question, and that is on your cloud business that you're seeing. Some suppliers to the cloud customers see very, very lumpy business, you know, a really strong quarter, then a couple quarters of digestion. I'm wondering now that you're seeing such strong strength in cloud, is it something that you anticipate some lumpiness or with the visibility you mentioned that they're kind of installing and using and ordering what their needs be, is there just less lumpiness for your products compared to some other, you know, server switches, compute products out there? Thank you.
It's interesting, Jim, I'll give you my perspective. I think it, we have to be very careful in the cloud of calling a one size fits all because obviously there's so many different types of business models and different application spaces, even inside individual customers, they have multiple applications. I do think like at the front end of the pandemic, when everything shifted to the cloud and work from home and these kinds of things, we were seeing massive investment that was happening in, what I would call transactional architecture, so very compute-intensive, very memory-intensive, and so on. I think that did not mean that mass capacity was not growing, but what it did mean was that the priority immediately for some of those type of customers was to make sure they could fulfill their service level agreements with their end customers who were pushing into the cloud. And that may be why, as people look back over the last year, they start to talk about lumpiness Just getting it all right can be hard, right? And you may invest for one architecture or application and then see opportunity somewhere else and pivot over there. So these are difficult problems, I'm sure, that people who have to build cloud data infrastructure and application layers are grappling with. Relative to mass capacity, I think the build-out has been much more thoughtful frankly, over time. And it's not to say that there aren't changes in strategies and opportunities as they see ways to go gain more efficiency other places, but I think the market is now diversified sufficiently and our predictability with customers has matured to a point where I'm comfortable that we're seeing a stronger demand picture that's more consistent like we talked about.
Thank you so much for the details. Thanks, Jim.
We have no further questions. I'd like to turn the call back over to presenters for closing remarks.
Thanks very much, everyone. I want to thank you for participating in this call and really thank our employees for all their hard work up and down the supply chain and the suppliers and customers. Many thanks from the Seagate team. as well and again thank our shareholders for their continued support in Seagate. We'll talk to you next quarter.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.