This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk06: Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. Welcome, everyone, to BlackRock CCP Capital Court's fourth quarter 2020 earnings conference call. Today's conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the company's formal remarks. To ask a question, please press star, then 1 on your touch-tone telephone. I will repeat these instructions before we begin the Q&A session. And now I would like to turn the call over to Katie McGlynn, Director of BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. Global Investor Relations Team. Katie, you may begin.
spk00: Thank you, Tawanda. Before we begin, I'll note that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements based on the estimates and assumptions of management at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those projected. Any forward-looking statements made on this call are made as of today and are subject to change without notice. Earlier today, we issued our earnings release for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. We also posted a supplemental earnings presentation to our website at tcpcapital.com. To view the slide presentation, which we will refer to on today's call, please click on the Investor Relations link and select Events and Presentations. These documents should be reviewed in conjunction with the company's Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC earlier today. I will now turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, Howard Levkowitz.
spk02: Thanks, Katie, and thank you for joining us today. First and foremost, we hope everyone is staying healthy and safe. There are several members of the TCPC team on the call with me, including our President and Chief Operating Officer, Raj Vig, and our Chief Financial Officer, Paul Davis. I will start with a few comments on our performance in 2020, and then I'll provide an update on our portfolio and key highlights from the fourth quarter. Next, Paul will review our financial results as well as our robust liquidity positions. After that, I'll provide some closing comments before opening the call to your questions. On last year's fourth quarter earnings call, we noted several risks to the economic environment, including the coronavirus. The magnitude of the impact that the pandemic has had on our day-to-day lives and across the world exceeded almost everyone's expectations. We would like to thank our entire team for their flexibility and hard work, together with the management teams and employees at our portfolio companies, which enabled us to deliver strong results for the year. Our ability to navigate the unique and evolving conditions in 2020 and deliver for our shareholders is a testament to our dedicated and skilled team and the strength of our carefully constructed, highly diversified portfolio. Despite the significant disruption in Q1, our net asset value increased year over year, and the credit quality of our portfolio remained strong throughout what proved to be a challenging year. The strong performance was due in part to our focus on less cyclical industries and middle market businesses that are more likely to withstand a downturn. In 2020, we meaningfully enhanced our strong capital and liquidity position. We extended our SVCP facility, replaced our TCPC funding facility on better terms, and we opportunistically added to our existing 2024 notes. Earlier this month, We also took advantage of the favorable bond market environment and issued an additional $175 million of unsecured notes in an attractive rate of 2.85%, record pricing for a sub-index eligible BDC bond issuance. Additionally, we opportunistically repurchased a million shares of our stock during the first quarter of 2020. This contributed $0.09 per share of accretion to our NAV. Finally, in August, we welcomed Andrea Petro to our board of directors. Andrea has nearly 30 years of experience in credit and specialty finance, and her addition to the board continues our long-term commitment to diversity. Following Andrea's appointment, half of our independent directors are women. Turning to our fourth quarter results, our NAV increased 4.2 percent from the prior quarter, reflecting a 1.7 percent net market value gain on our investments. This was driven by further spread narrowing on middle market private credit transactions, as well as significant gains resulting from improved financial performance at many of our portfolio companies. Among our significant investment gains in the fourth quarter was our investment in Edmentum, a leading provider of online educational programs. Edmentum received an equity investment from a new majority investor in the quarter, and we were able to realize a gain on our position while retaining a minority ownership interest in the company. This outcome demonstrates our team's ability to leverage its deep special situations expertise to work with the company through a challenging situation and deliver strongly improved financial performance. Edmentum is also currently benefiting from the accelerated demand for online learning solutions amid the pandemic. Given our retained ownership of the company, we believe we will continue to participate in Edmentum's ongoing success. Turning to our portfolio positioning, at year end, our portfolio had a fair market value of approximately $1.6 billion, essentially unchanged from the prior quarter. Eighty-nine percent of our investments are in senior secured debt and represent a wide range of industries. Our diverse portfolio is weighted toward businesses with limited direct exposure to sectors that have been more severely affected by the pandemic. Furthermore, Our loans to companies in more impacted industries, including retail and airlines, are generally supported by strong collateral protections, and most of our investments in these industries continue to perform well. As an example, the value of our investment in OneSky, the second largest provider of private jet aviation services in the country, again appreciated during the quarter. The company is performing well given strong demand for charter flights, despite challenges facing most businesses in the travel sectors. Our diverse portfolio included 96 companies at year-end. Our largest position, 36th Street, represents 4.5% of the total portfolio and provides further diversification given its highly diversified underlying portfolio of lease assets. As the chart on the left side of slide seven of the presentation illustrates, our recurring income is not reliant on income from any one portfolio company. In fact, Over half of our individual portfolio companies contribute less than 1% to our recurring income. 95% of our debt investments are floating rate. 80% of these are subject to interest rate floors, all of which are now in effect. Additionally, 88% of our debt investments are first lane. Moving on to our investment activity, market origination volumes were robust in the fourth quarter. While we have been active deploying capital, we are maintaining our disciplined approach to investing, executing only a small percentage of the opportunities we review. As a result, we invested $183 million during the fourth quarter, including investments in 15 new loans, nearly two-thirds of which were with existing borrowers. Follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies continue to be an important source of opportunities. From a risk management perspective, these are companies we know and understand well. As we analyze new investment opportunities, we continue to emphasize seniority in the capital structure, industry diversity, and transactions where we act as a leader co-lead. Our largest new investment during the fourth quarter was a loan to Team Services, a leading provider of home care assistance for the elderly and people with disabilities. Team is benefiting from an acceleration in the shift toward home care and away from institutional settings as a result of COVID. Given our extensive experience and deep relationships in healthcare, we were chosen to lead the second lean financing. The company's niche focus within the healthcare sector and our industry expertise provided us the opportunity to invest in a successful but overlooked business with a quality management team and strong support from their equity owner. Dispositions in the fourth quarter were $213 million and included payoffs of our $28 million loan to Higginbotham and our $25 million loan to ECI, as well as the payoff of our loans to Edmonton, resulting from the company's acquisition, which I referred to earlier. Investments in new portfolio companies during the quarter had a weighted average effective yield of 9.6%. Investments we exited had a weighted average effective yield of 9.9%. The overall effective yield on our debt portfolio was 9.6%. Over the last two years, LIBOR has declined 256 basis points, or by 91%, which has put pressure on our portfolio yield over this period. However, our portfolio is largely protected from any further declines in interest rates as nearly 80% of our floating rate loans are currently operating with LIBOR floors. Our investment activity in the first quarter to date continues to be selective and focused on companies that are minimally impacted by the pandemic or are beneficiaries of the COVID-impacted operating environment. Our investment activity to date totals approximately $107 million primarily in five senior secured loans with a combined effective yield of approximately 10.2%. The yields on investments in our pipeline are generally in line with our current portfolio yield. Now, I'll turn the call over to Paul, who will discuss our financial results in more detail.
spk13: Paul? Thanks, Howard, and hello, everyone. Net investment income for the fourth quarter of $0.35 per share again exceeded our dividend of $0.30 per share last And today we declared a first quarter dividend of 30 cents per share. We remain committed to paying a sustainable dividend that is fully covered by net investment income as we have done every quarter since our IPO in 2012. Net investment income for the full year was $1.44 per share. Investment income for the fourth quarter was 74 cents per share. This included recurring cash interest of 60 cents. recurring discount and fee amortization of $0.03 and PIC income of $0.04. This was our lowest level of PIC income in three years. As a reminder, our income recognition follows our conservative policy of generally amortizing up for economics over the life of an investment rather than recognizing all of it at the time the investment is made. Investment income also included $0.03 of other income, a penny from dividend income and $0.04 from prepayment income. While prepayment income is always lumpy, it's been historically lower in the first quarter of each year and has been particularly minimal so far in 2021. Operating expenses for the fourth quarter were 31 cents per share and included interest and other debt expenses of 17 cents per share. Incentive fees in the fourth quarter, including 0.6 million of previously deferred fees, totaled $5.0 million. or $0.09 per share for total net investment income of $0.35 per share. As noted in our second quarter earnings call, incentive fees related to our income for the first quarter of 2020 were deferred. While the full amount was earned in the second quarter when our performance again surpassed our total return hurdle, we voluntarily further deferred the amount over six quarters subject to our cumulative performance remaining above the hurdle. We believe this further aligns our interests with those of our shareholders and demonstrates our confidence in the strength of our portfolio and its earnings capacity over time. Our net increase in net assets for the quarter was $48 million, or 83 cents per share, which included net unrealized gains of $20 million and net realized gains of $7.9 million. Unrealized gains reflected both continued spread tightening and credit-specific gains at a number of portfolio companies. The largest gains included $5.0 million on our investment in Securus, $3.9 million from OneSky, $3.8 million from Amtech, and each company saw continued improvements in their financial performance. We also realized gains of $9.3 million on our investment in Inventum for an overall net gain this quarter of $2.9 million on this investment. Substantially, all of our investments are valued every quarter using prices provided by independent third-party sources. These include quotation services and independent valuation services, and our process is also subject to rigorous oversight, including backtesting of every disposition against our valuations. Our overall credit quality remains sound with no new non-accruals in the fourth quarter. Our loans to the three portfolio companies on non-accrual, GlassPoint, CIBT, and Avanti, together represented only 0.5% of the portfolio at fair value and 1.2% at cost. We ended the year with total liquidity of $342 million. This included available leverage of $355 million and cash of $20 million. less net pending settlements of $33 million. Unfunded loan commitments to portfolio companies at quarter end equaled 4% of total investments, or $69 million, of which $23 million were revolver commitments. During 2020, we further strengthened our diverse and flexible leverage program, which included two low-cost credit facilities, a convertible note issuance, two straight unsecured note issuances, and an SBA program. Enhancements included replacing our TCPC funding facility with a new one on improved terms, including a two-year maturity extension, extending the maturity of our operating facility and adding a $100 million accordion, and issuing an additional $50 million of our 2024 unsecured notes. Furthermore, earlier this month, we opportunistically issued an additional $175 million of unsecured notes at a record low coupon of 2.85%. Our unsecured debt continues to be investment-grade rated by both Moody's and Fitch. Earlier this month, Fitch reaffirmed our investment-grade rating with Stable Outlook, noting among other items our solid truck record in credit, experienced management team, and strong funding flexibility. And today, Moody's also reaffirmed their investment-grade rating for TCPC with Stable Outlook. Given the modest size of each of our debt issuances, we are not overly reliant on any single source of financing, and our leverage program is well-laddered. Our nearest maturity is March of 2022, and given the success of our recent bond issuance, we are very well positioned to redeem those notes when due. Combined, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding liabilities decreased 30 basis points to 3.54%, down from 3.84% at the end of 2019. I'll now turn the call back over to Howard. Thanks, Paul.
spk02: The past year emphasized the key role that BDCs play in providing capital to the middle market businesses that account for roughly a third of private sector GDP. These businesses have again proved to be resilient, demonstrating their collective appeal for investment. Middle market companies, for example, reported significantly fewer job declines last year than both larger companies and smaller businesses. BDCs like TCPC help to ensure that these companies have consistent access to financing solutions. Our team has been lending to middle market companies for more than two decades through multiple cycles, including the dot-com bubble, global financial crisis, the energy bust of 2015-16, and now the COVID-19 pandemic. We have drawn upon this experience to inform our investment decisions and perform throughout this most recent market dislocation. Since our IPO in 2012, TCPC has returned more than $12 per share in dividends, which translates to an annualized cash return to investors of 9.8%, and is reflective of our return on invested assets of 10.5%. TCPC has also consistently outperformed the Wells Fargo BDC Index. The overall market environment continues to improve, and we're seeing a pickup in activity. That said, we remain extremely selective, executing on only a small number of opportunities we review and focusing on companies we believe have minimal COVID exposure or those that are positioned to outperform in this environment. Overall, as we navigate the persistent uncertainty in the market, we are guided by our experience managing through prior downturns and periods of market volatility, and we will continue to seek to, one, maintain a diversified portfolio that underweights highly cyclical industries, two, take advantage of unique and not widely understood industry dynamics, three, take structurally senior secured positions in the capital stack, and four, structure transactions to include specific collateral and assets for downside risk mitigation. Our performance to date and our confidence in our ability to succeed in this environment are driven by our team's two decades of experience in both performing and distressed credit, the strength of our underwriting platform, as well as the depth and breadth of firm-wide resources of BlackRock. In closing, we would like to thank our entire team for their dedication and focus on generating strong risk-adjusted returns for our shareholders, even in these challenging times. And with that, Operator. Please open the call for questions.
spk01: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you have a question at this time, please press the star followed by the number one key on your touchtone telephone. If your question has been answered or you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press the pound key. Once again, to ask a question, please press star and then one now. And our first question will come from Devin Ryan from JMP Security. Your line is open.
spk11: Great. Good afternoon, everyone. Hi there. So, hi. First question, I appreciate all the detail that you guys provided, but I'd love to maybe think about the potential to expand or grow the portfolio in 2021. Obviously, the portfolio size has been fairly steady for the past couple of years, and just given the strong capital markets backdrop and kind of what you're seeing more broadly, just expectations and kind of opportunity to expand the absolute size here.
spk02: Sure. Thanks for the question. Our primary focus is on generating long-term consistent returns for our shareholders. We're very proud of the fact that we have covered the dividend for 35 consecutive quarters. We've been able to generate, as we noted before, 10.5% gross returns on assets And as we think about the vehicle, that is our primary focus. We have grown over time. Like any business, we like to grow. And if we see opportunities that are appropriate that would enable us to do the right thing for shareholders over the long term, we would certainly look at doing that. but we are not focused on growth for the sake of growth, and we're happy to have the portfolio maintain a consistent size or to the extent appropriate, shrink a little bit if we're not seeing appropriate deal flow.
spk11: Appreciate that. So I guess that's the follow-up here. In terms of the backdrop, obviously we've been hearing about very strong conditions for borrowers, which is but obviously it can create more challenges deploying capital. So I'd just love to get some thoughts around kind of where you guys are seeing the most attractive risk rewards in the market and just more broadly how you feel like risk is being valued right now, just given that I think we're in kind of what's been a very positive or even some people say frothy market. So I'd just love to kind of get a little bit more granularity on what you guys are seeing there.
spk10: Yeah, maybe I'll add on to that. I think just to highlight, in addition to Howard's comments, our challenge has not been deployment. If you look at even this last quarter, the number we deployed is a pretty healthy number, not a record-setting, but a good number. We just had a lot of repayments, and I think there's a lot of unusual activity in 2020 culminating in an incredibly active fourth quarter, to be honest. The team was full out. We just had also a lot of opportunistic refinancings, which in some sense is segues to your second question around risk and opportunity. I think we are really finding opportunity in many of the same areas we have always looked, even pre-COVID, defensive industries, well-positioned businesses, industries that we find acyclical with very predictable top-line revenues and earnings. And in fact, I think of 2020, is in many ways the validation given the performance, you know, both through the toughest time and also into the early stages of recovery of the business model, you know, of finding, you know, proprietary and, you know, consistently repeatable sources in the industry approach that lets us diligence with a very, very, you know, active view of downside protection. Some of those industries you're seeing quite a bit of activity in, such as healthcare and ongoing activity in software and services. We have seen a pickup in, I would say, financial services, you know, across the portfolio, not financial risk assets, but financial services. And so those, I would say, are some of the areas that we, you know, we've been focusing on. The pipeline is strong, and you've seen the deployment in Q4 reflect that. There clearly has been a tightening up since the COVID spike in March on rates and on pricing. The approach we've always taken has been to be very selective, to source a lot of opportunities from a lot of different areas, and to, you know, try to pick the best from those. And that doesn't change. I think we remain defensive in terms of our structures, predominantly secured, you know, first lean. We are very thankful we have, you know, real covenants in the portfolio that has been helpful through the tough, you know, sort of some of the more defensive efforts we've had in 2020. So it's a long-winded way of saying we're going to just keep focusing on the areas we focused on. It's worked for us. The performance, I think, has been strong, and it feels like the pipeline is good, but there are a lot of areas where people are asking for things that may be a bridge too far and that we will pass on, and that's okay. Okay.
spk11: Yeah, no, I really appreciate the color. I'll leave it there, but congrats on a really nice end of the year and all the progress you guys have made on the liability side as well.
spk02: Thank you, and thanks for joining us today.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Robert Dodd from Raymond James. Your line is open.
spk09: Hi, guys. Congratulations on the performance NAV earnings. Very tough year. So if I can, kind of tied into Devon's question. On prepayment more than anything else, obviously Q4, $0.04 in prepayment fees, that's pretty normal, right? 2020, obviously, was low given the environment. Paul, I think, said that it's been quite muted so far. I mean, granted, it's February this year. And I realize it's very hard to predict. I'm not acting back quarter to quarter. But over the course of the year, do you expect this to be kind of a normal kind of prepayment activity year, obviously in terms of fee income and portfolio rotation? Or do you think it's going to be elevated given how appealing the market is to borrowers right now or muted this year? Do you have any feel on that?
spk10: Yeah. Yeah. Robert, thanks for the question and good to hear from you. You know, I think the first word I would, you know, I don't know how to define what normal is anymore. We've seen a lot. So I guess, you know, I don't know if that is a thing we can define given 2020, you know, given some of the activity in different quarters, even before COVID. I do think there is some settling down of the market and the cadence of deals. I think there has been a, you know, maybe more in the liquid markets, but certainly in our markets, a rush of people taking advantage to finance in the context of some real business model, you know, acceleration and transformations, you know, both positive and negative. And, you know, there's been two to three quarters of that into Q1. So maybe that means that we're back to some sort of business as usual, but I still think there is a question of what business as usual is. for some time, and we're hopeful for that, but do I think it's going to be as crazy as it was in 2020 in Q3 and Q4? Probably not, but there could be a lingering effect that we just have to respond to as best we can.
spk02: Robert, it's Howard. I'll just add one thing to what Raj said. As we look back at our prepayment history going back two decades, Over long periods of time, it's pretty consistent. Even remarkably, 07, 08, 09, if you take a series of quarters, borrowers tend to repay at something on an annual rate of 25% to 35%. But there's big differentiation. If you look at this last year, we were Q1, at about 5%, Q2 at about 6%, Q3 at 5%, and Q4 at 13%. Q1 is seasonally light, typically. But then within that, there's also, it's not just the magnitude of prepayments. Certain instruments have higher prepayment premium and or may be prepaid earlier in their life cycle generating more prepayment income. And I think Paul's comment was just intended to let you know that to date we hadn't received those amounts, just to provide a little bit more information.
spk09: I appreciate that. Thank you for the comment. Second one, kind of flipping to the other side of the balance sheet, obviously you don't have a maturity until – um, March of, of, of next year, uh, then there's, there's another one, um, in, in August of next year as well. I mean, and it might be callable six months in advance, uh, or prepayable, I don't know. But, um, in, in this environment, um, if, if the bond market opportunity for BDCs and for you in particular, obviously, like you said, there's a very low cost bond, um, Should we expect you to replace those maturities with additional unsecured, or would you potentially want to run your revolver a little larger? I mean, not too much with the balance sheet, obviously, but how are you thinking about the balance there?
spk02: We're very pleased with the right side of the balance sheet. We have great relationships long-term with our revolver lenders, and they provided us with more capacity and extensions during the worst period last year, during the early spring. And we're also deeply appreciative of our relationships in the bond market and having been able to issue what we believe is a record low-cost sub-index, and for those who aren't familiar with that, below $300 million is less liquid for bond issues. Hey, Kevin, I'm going to call you right back.
spk11: I've got to hop off for one second. I'll call you right back.
spk02: Operator, we'd appreciate your making sure that all other lines are muted, please. Thank you. So, but today we have seven ways of financing our balance sheet, and we like the combination of having revolvers and unsecured debt, and having the ability to utilize our revolver to pay down any of the bond issues that you mentioned gives us tremendous flexibility. And so we have ample credit capacity today. We're very pleased with the significant liquidity that we have. obviously we can repay bonds at maturity and to the extent there's an opportunity to perhaps do so in some other way beforehand, that's something that can be considered as well.
spk09: Thank you.
spk01: I appreciate it. Thank you. Our next question comes from Finian O'Shea from Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is open.
spk03: Hi, everyone. Good afternoon. I've First question on a portfolio company. Mesa Air looks like it was grouped together and maybe one entity. Just a small question there. Is it as simple as that, or was there some sort of business change in Mesa for you?
spk02: We had several exposures to Mesa, one of which was repaid. and so that may be what you're referring to. It's broken out into a number of items on the balance sheet because there's distinct pools of collateral that are cross-collateralized, but we're pleased. Obviously, it's been a difficult environment for commercial airlines. They've continued to have access to liquidity through government programs, and their major airline counterparts have And in connection with that, they paid down one of our two primary exposures. The other one continues to amortize regularly, and that's why that balance is being reduced.
spk03: Okay, I think that's helpful. And then, Howard, for the loans you are making today, how do you structure or document the the loan to account for the transition away from LIBOR?
spk02: Sure. Yeah, thanks for the question. What we do is provide provisions in there that account for a successor instrument and and a default to the extent that there isn't an appropriate one. And I think this is pretty standard in documents where they'll refer to the reference rate or prime rate if there isn't anything else, but that you default to the replacement rate as a first choice. So we've spent a lot of time analyzing this issue. going back several years now, and believe that we're appropriately positioned to deal with them.
spk03: Okay, great. That's all for me. Thank you.
spk02: Thanks for the questions, Finn.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from David Miyazaki from Confluence Investment. Your line is open. Okay.
spk04: Hi, thank you for taking my questions, and I appreciate the way that you guys have navigated 2020 and gotten your shareholders through a pretty surprising and volatile timeframe. If I could, just to kind of extend a little bit on Finn's question with regard to the airline industry, you know, Howard, you have a long history investing in the credit markets, And, you know, it's been my observation that you're pretty shrewd in your exposure to airlines going back 20 years and really making some pretty notable loans back when the industry was disrupted in around the 9-11 timeframe and then also kind of noteworthy in avoiding aircraft leasing at the wrong time in more recent years. So... Can you provide a little bit of insight as to how you look at that industry and other industries that have experienced a sea change with regard to the pandemic?
spk02: Sure. Thank you for the question. It's an interesting one. I think the way we've looked at the airline industry is probably emblematic of the way we look at the whole portfolio, which is we have deep expertise there. We've been financing companies, as you pointed out, since 9-11, but we're very opportunistic. And so when other people aren't financing it or we see good risk-adjusted rewards, we have great relationships. We've done financings for most of the major U.S. carriers as well as some smaller ones. we haven't added any exposure recently because we haven't seen what we deem to be good risk-rewards. We've seen lots of deals, but one of the advantages of our structure, which is focused on industries, and we've got 19 industry teams, is we can go where the best deals are. And Raj was talking about earlier some of the things we're focusing on. There's a lot of robust activity in a lot of less cyclical areas. And, you know, We're still doing things in cyclical industries, but the bar is high. And in the case of aircraft financing, which is really the way we look at it, is we're financing metal, you know, hard collateral. We haven't seen pricing come to where we think it needs to be, and that's why we haven't put out new money. I'm frankly surprised. If you would have asked us in the spring, are you likely to do some things in this sector, we would have said probably. But having the discipline to avoid going into something just because you're seeing deals in it, you know, I think is really an important part of managing this business. And so we're going to where we see good risk-adjusted rewards, and we've got a broad enough pipeline that that gives us the ability to choose. You know, but we're continuing to look at things across a broad variety of sectors, and I suspect you'll see that evolution in the portfolio, you know, going through the rest of the year.
spk04: Yeah, honestly, I was sort of surprised that you guys didn't come across some opportunities because the industry has been really as or perhaps even more disrupted in this particular cycle than it has been in the past. So it's rather interesting to hear that the pricing never really responded. If I could shift gears on you instead of going back that far in your history, but more to kind of your modern perspective, or recent situation is that with you now being part of the broader BlackRock platform, are there any generalities or specific resources that have become available to you as a part of BlackRock that were helpful during the pandemic and of particular interest? I don't know if it's manifested, I'd be interested to know if BlackRock has been able to provide any insight or resources with regard to regulation or even legislation with regard to the BDC industry.
spk10: Hi, David. It's Raj. I'll take the first part of that in terms of the broader platform and benefits through this time. Even before COVID, but just on a certainly an accelerated basis in COVID. I would highlight three areas that we really ramped up that helped us, I think, navigate 2020, as you said, in a positive way, and appreciate that comment. One is, you know, keep in mind, BlackRock has a pretty notable presence, you know, in virtually all the capital markets in all sectors, you know, liquid, private, you know, infrastructure, real estate, and a lot of industry insights. that's available in the platform and I think harnessed quite well to take advantage of. And we were literally having calls daily on cross-asset pricing, on trends tied to the virus, and also implications to industries with a lot of internal industry and healthcare and just authoritative perspectives that led us, I think, really put our own private capital portfolio in context, you know, where we wanted to spend time, where we really needed to focus defensively, where there might be opportunities. So I think that cross-asset perspective, you know, was very helpful in understanding risk and pricing, you know, for us in a way that we couldn't have on our own. BlackRock also at its core is, you know, is built on a risk management approach. We talked about this before, you know, COVID and part of our integrations We have a dedicated, you know, overlay risk and quantitative analysis team that has, I think, put a lot of good rigor into how we look at our portfolio in addition to the underwriting. And that's just been on an ongoing basis that I think, you know, as managers of the portfolio, we appreciate. And finally, even on the liability side, you've seen some of the, you know, the movement and the changes and the terming out of the right side of the balance sheet. As you can imagine, you know, BlackRock's presence with intermediaries, both for sourcing but also for, you know, issuing some of the liability and the debt doesn't hurt. So I think, you know, hopefully that's not just a COVID-related activity but an ongoing one. But, you know, in the latter part of 2020, we were able to take, you know, some advantage of those relationships, you know, to a successful completion of issuance. And I don't know if Howard has any comments on the regulatory side of it, but maybe if he does, we can turn it over to him.
spk02: Yeah, it's something that we obviously continue to monitor and be advocates of. The fact that BDCs continue to be penalized in effect by having a more limited group of investors as a result of the AFFE policy restrictions or rules is something that everybody, I think, who's involved in the sector is cognizant of. And we continue to do our part to be advocates to do what we think is in the interests of everybody in the sector and shareholders more broadly, which is to expand the sector on a more institutional basis so that... it's easier for mutual funds, other 40-act vehicles, and hopefully, once again, index funds to more broadly own the sector without having the penalty associated with the way the AFFE rules are applied. And we remain hopeful. We'll see what happens.
spk04: Okay, great. Well, I appreciate a good quarter and a good year, and I thank you for your comments.
spk02: Thank you, and thanks for joining us.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Ryan Lynch from KBW. Your line is open.
spk07: Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Congrats, first off, on a good quarter and maybe, more importantly, a good year. And that's where I really want to start with my first question. You know, 2020, you guys were able to actually grow your net asset value throughout the year in the midst of a downturn and generate, you know, very strong results. In fact, the results in 2020 that you generated were stronger than the results that you've generated in the last couple of years, despite 2020, you know, having a pandemic and a significant downturn. So can you reconcile why your results were so strong in 2020 and what does that say about your business and how did it outperform previous years?
spk02: Sure. Look, I think we are wired to analyze difficult situations. If you think about the heritage of our business, it really comes out of special situations, investing and understanding difficult times. And I think in tougher times, we tend to shine. Ultimately, the performance TCPC during 2020 was a function of, first and foremost, a robust portfolio and not having significant losses and, in fact, taking down our non-accruals. It was also effective deployment of capital on an incremental basis, although there wasn't a huge amount of that. That which we did was effective. And it was also balance sheet management. We went into it well prepared. We had a small proportion of our assets in delayed draws and revolvers. We had ample liquidity. We had good financing partners who gave us more flexibility and more room. And that also put us in position when the industry sold off to buy in stock, which we thought was an appropriate use of capital at the time. And so I think it's really a combination of factors. In 2019, we did take a hit on one particular position, which we've talked about, which we thought was an anomalous result. It was a larger position that we've dealt with at Fidelis. But I think if you look at the over two-decade track record that we have, and even the nine-year track record as a public company where our return on assets has been about 10.5%, 2020 is, I think, more emblematic of our history and the way we've been able to perform over a long period of time.
spk05: Okay.
spk07: That's helpful color on that. One of the things that we've heard from several BDCs over the last, you know, prior to 2020 was you know, late cycle investing, late cycle investing, late cycle investing, whatever that means, that particular name. And now that we've actually went through a downturn and we're actually in now a recovery phase as opposed to fearing a downturn, which is what people were fearing back in 2017, 2018, 2019, do you intend to shift your investment philosophy at all? I know it's not going to be any sort of wholesale changes to how you guys look at credit and underwriting, but do you see any modest shifts in whether it's a particular industry or industries you choose to focus on or where you're positioning the capital structure coming out of a major downturn?
spk10: Yeah, maybe I'll take that one. And I think the short answer is, Well, two things. One, I think the short answer is no, because what we have been doing feels like it's been working for us. And if anything, I view 2020 as, I don't know what the down cycle is. I mean, the cause of this period is relatively unusual. But the performance and all the things that Howard mentioned as to the prior question as to what I think drives it, is working and I think is further validated by some of the activity in 2020. For me, focusing on defensive sectors, areas that we know, whether it's an asset or an industry, and structures that give us both downside protection and, importantly, ability to step in and protect our capital or even improve our position, which did happen through 2020, is a good way to approach a credit business versus going risk on and trying to be more proactive and, you know, maybe chasing returns or yields without the ability to protect those when you need it. So, you know, I think that there may be some, you know, evolution or nuanced differences at the margin. Certainly we are constantly reevaluating our industry groups and where we want to focus and what we want to avoid. But I think I put that in the context of staying focused consistent with what we've done and very disciplined. And I think, you know, hopefully good things come from that.
spk07: Okay. Understood. And maybe they kind of take it to the opposite end of that versus, you know, more risk, which was kind of my previous question in the portfolio, you know, being able to issue sub 3% unsecured debt on the right side of your balance sheet, did that change, your guys' investment approach or the types of deals that you guys would be now willing to put on the left side of your balance sheet and in your portfolio, giving that low cost of unsecured debt?
spk02: It really doesn't, Ryan. Obviously, having a lower cost of funding is helpful, but we've been doing this a long time. We don't move around our investment philosophy or our assets based on small changes in our cost of financing or on short-term changes in the capital markets or the economy. Ultimately, what we try and do is build a robust portfolio that we think can withstand you know, a lot of different scenarios. And, you know, as you just pointed out, we just went through another downturn, a very different kind than the last downturn, you know, during the great financial crisis. So we've got yet another set of criteria to use in our stress cases, which is great. But if something doesn't work in the portfolio, we don't just put it in because we can borrow against it a little bit more cheaply.
spk07: That makes sense. I appreciate the time today. Those are all my questions. Good. Thanks for joining us.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Christopher Nolan from Lattenberg Thelman. Your line is open.
spk12: Howard, following up on Ryan's question, given that the stock price still trades below NAV and given that your debt costs look to be I mean, unbelievably attractive there. What's the capital strategy in terms of another 2,022 notes you mentioned earlier? You might wait until they're mature, but you can also, you know, redeem them at any time with a make-whole premium. That has a 4.125% coupon. Any thoughts redeeming that in 2021? Yeah.
spk02: We will see what happens. Ultimately, one of the nice things about having the flexibility that we do in our capital structure, significant undrawn capacity under both of our revolvers, and significant headroom in regulatory capital means that we have a lot of flexibility there. And so, you know, obviously the interest rate environment has changed, you know, fairly significantly the last couple of weeks. That may affect people's views of what price they want to hold bonds. And so we will look at, you know, what makes the most sense as we get further into the year.
spk12: Great. And I guess a follow-up question. Given that revolving facilities have a lot of non-direct costs, legal and so forth associated with them, Do you consider this new unsecured debt you guys just issued to be your cheapest form of capital?
spk02: Well, you know, you can look at the math on that, and it's a good question. Ultimately, the all-in costs of the revolvers, if you really want to look at it analytically, you probably need to wait until the end to see, you know, what happens with them, how they're extended, how much gets utilized. The bonds are easier to analyze. We'd also like to call your attention, and I think you're aware of this, to our SBA financing or SBIC facilities, which also have very attractive long-term financing costs. And, yeah, there's some additional costs, but the overall coupon rate on those for long-term is really quite cost-effective also. Got it. Okay.
spk12: Good quarter, good year.
spk02: Thank you. Thank you.
spk01: Thank you. Our next question comes from Chris Kotowski from Oppenheimer and Company. Your line is open.
spk08: Good afternoon, and thank you. Knowing that you folks never like to do anything in a herky-jerky way and having just trimmed your dividends from 36 to 30 last year, you know, for reasons that are understandable kind of in the middle of the lockdowns, But, you know, guess what? You've been kind of earning the old dividend and there's been like no NAV diminution or your NAV is back to the pre-COVID level. So theoretically, there shouldn't be any kind of underlying earnings diminution in your earnings capability. And so I'm just kind of wondering, you know, again, not for the next quarter, two or three, but just philosophically, what would you be looking forward to, or is it a goal to get back to the prior distribution, and what would you be looking forward to get there?
spk02: Yeah, thanks. I just want to remind you of something that we had said earlier about the decrease in LIBOR, which basically cost $0.09 a share. So, yes, we did this during the lockdown. but we were also reacting to the very significant change in LIBOR, and the math is set out in our K and our Q, and you can pretty easily do it in your head as well. And so when we made that decision, it was really primarily looking at LIBOR as opposed to events in the portfolio. We're very proud of having earned our dividend every quarter. We think investors take comfort from dividend stability, knowing that it's well earned and appropriately covered. And, you know, that's really been our focus. You know, I think the other thing is, as you look at our earnings, we've benefited from prepayment fees. And as we discussed earlier on the call, those are lumpy. You know, we've had significant prepayment fees the last couple of quarters. We don't always. We didn't Q1 of last year. In fact, we had very few then, and Q1 tends to be a seasonally slower quarter. Paul pointed out we hadn't received any in a material way yet this quarter, and so, you know, Not everything is always like clockwork. We take great pride and comfort from knowing that we've got good dividend coverage, but we also know that there's a certain lumpiness to the extra earnings from additional fees, dividends, prepayments, and other more unusual items.
spk08: Okay. That's it for me. Thank you.
spk02: Thank you, and thanks for hanging in there with the question.
spk01: Okay. Thank you. And that does conclude our question and answer session for today's conference. And I'd like to turn the conference back over to Howard Leskowitz for any closing remarks.
spk02: Thank you. We appreciate your questions and our dialogue today. I would like to thank all of our shareholders for your confidence and your continued support. I'd also like to, again, thank our experienced and talented team of professionals at BlackRock TCP Capital Corp for your continued hard work and dedication in these challenging times. Thanks for joining us. This concludes today's call.
spk01: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude the program and you may all disconnect. Everyone, have a wonderful day.
Disclaimer