This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk02: Welcome, everyone, to BlackRock TCP Capital Corp's first quarter 2023 earnings conference call. Today's conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the company's formal remarks. To ask a question, please press the star key followed by the digit 1. I will repeat these instructions prior to the Q&A session. And now, I would like to turn the call over to Katie McLynn, Director of BlackRock TCP Capital Corp Investor Relations Team. Katie, please proceed.
spk01: Thank you, Ciara. Before we begin, I'll note that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements based on the estimates and assumptions of management at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those projected. Any forward-looking statements made on this call are made as of today and are subject to change without notice. Additionally, certain information discussed and presented may have been derived from third-party sources and has not been independently verified. Accordingly, we make no representation or warranty with respect to such information. Earlier today, we issued our earnings release for the first quarter ended March 31, 2023. We also posted a supplemental earnings presentation to our website at www.tcpcapitals.com. To view the slide presentation, which we will refer to on today's call, please click on the Investor Relations link and select Events and Presentations. These documents should be reviewed in conjunction with the company's Form 10-Q, which was filed with the SEC earlier today. I will now turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, Raj Vig.
spk07: Thanks, Katie, and thank you all for joining us for TCPC's first quarter 2023 earnings call. I will begin today's call with a few comments on the market environment and provide an overview of our first quarter results. I will then turn the call over to our President and Chief Operating Officer, Phil Tseng, who will provide an update on our portfolio and investment activity. Our CFO, Eric Cuellar, will then review our financial results as well as our capital and liquidity positioning in greater detail. I will then conclude with a few closing remarks before we take your questions. As you all observed, market indices were generally down across the board in 2022. However, even with the broader market weakness during the year, private credit assets generally held up well, further demonstrating the resiliency and stability of the asset class in different market environments. During the early part of 2023, we saw notable recoveries across most asset classes from their respective 2022 performances. Markets stabilized as we entered the year, but by the latter part of Q1, struggles that emerged in the banking sector understandably shook investor confidence and drove a volatility that continues today, with now several bank failures crystallized. Notwithstanding the broader social and economic implications, Weakness and even turmoil in the banking sector is hardly a new dynamic to establish private market participants. Rather, it is a dynamic we have benefited from for most of our nearly 23 years lending to middle market companies who continue to look in ever greater numbers for alternatives to traditional forms of financing. While it's too early to say when the current situation will be fully resolved, we believe the reaction to recent events in the banking sector will likely make it even less efficient and less economic for banks to lend to the middle market and therefore further support, if not accelerate, the opportunity for well-positioned private credit lenders such as ourselves. In addition, the swift collapse of several banks and ongoing concern with the sector has been a reminder to borrowers of the benefits of working with a direct lender like BlackRock. Direct lenders can act quickly when needed and have locked up or permanent capital that facilitates stable, long-term financing solutions to borrowers that remain available during periods of market dislocation. We have seen this firsthand many times, including during the early days of COVID and again more recently this past quarter with the few portfolio companies we have that had cash deposits with Silicon Valley Bank. When the news about the challenges that the bank started to spread and these companies had difficulty accessing their liquidity, our team was in position to provide short-term liquidity had it been required. Fortunately, the Fed stepped in to backstop their deposits, and ultimately our capital was not needed, but our ability to work directly with these borrowers and to act quickly were further reminders of the value that credit managers can provide. Now I'd like to turn to our first quarter highlights. We delivered strong net investment income of 44 cents per share in the first quarter. Given the floating rate nature of our portfolio, our net investment income continues to benefit from higher base rates as well as wider spreads on new investments, resulting in a run rate NII that is among the highest in TCP's history as a public company. In recognition of the higher ongoing earnings power of TCPC, primarily to provide the rate environment, our board of directors today announced an increase of two cents per share to the quarterly dividend distribution. The second quarter dividend of 34 cents per share will be payable on June 30th to shareholders of record on June 16th. As a reminder, our board has always taken a disciplined approach with regard to the dividend, given our emphasis on stability and strong coverage through our recurring net investment income. Throughout TCPC's history, we have consistently covered our dividends with recurring net investment income. This commitment remains important to us, and even accounting for the dividend increase declared for the second quarter, our first quarter dividend coverage ratio would have been approximately 129%. Phil will discuss our first quarter investment activity in more detail, but in summary, we are being disciplined in deploying new capital in this uncertain environment, while also selectively taking advantage of the more lender-friendly investment environment. We reviewed a substantial number of transactions during the quarter and deployed capital in a small percentage of those opportunities. Given the slowdown in private equity deal volumes, we are reminded of the benefits of our channel-agnostic approach to deal sourcing. Our pipeline remains healthy, and given our direct relationships with management teams and other industry participants, we continue to find attractive opportunities in the current environment. Finally, the credit quality of our portfolio remains solid, with loans to just two portfolio companies on non-accrual as of the end of the first quarter totaling just 0.3% of total investments at fair value, among the lowest non-accrual levels in TCPC's history as a public company. Auto Alert, which was placed on non-approval in Q4 of last year, was successfully restructured in Q1, and our loans are now back on approval status. While still early, it appears that some of the macro headwinds that had been facing the company since the onset of the pandemic appear to be abating, and we have been encouraged by Auto Alert's relative performance year-to-date and post the completed restructuring. Looking back at our historical performance as a public company since 2012, we have generated a 10.3% annualized return on invested assets and a total annualized cash return of 9.3%. We believe this performance remains at the high end of our peer group and reflects our ability to consistently identify attractive opportunities at premium yields and deliver exceptional returns to our shareholders across market cycles. Now, I will turn it over to Phil to discuss our investment activity and portfolio positioning.
spk00: Thank you, Raj. I'll start with a few comments on our existing portfolio and then move on to highlight our investment activity during the first quarter. We continue to emphasize strong portfolio management and credit monitoring procedures for our existing portfolio companies. As a reminder, our investment team members specialize across industry verticals and are responsible for sourcing investment opportunities, underwriting and structuring those opportunities, and then monitoring them until exit. We view this as an advantage as it ensures that the relationships and the knowledge developed during the deal sourcing process and during the deep private equity-like due diligence process can be leveraged throughout the life of the investment. Our investment teams are continuously engaged in dialogue with owners and operators to assess both current and projected performance relative to our original underwriting assumptions. In addition, deal team members review portfolio company performance on a quarterly, if not more frequent basis. This process helps in proactively identifying investments that may require more engagement with management to ensure our loans remain well protected. Given the higher rate environment, higher input costs, and general uncertainty in the economy, we are working with a few companies to help them navigate slower revenue growth and or margin pressure. However, we recently completed our quarterly review process and are pleased to report that their portfolio generally remains in good shape. In fact, despite the margin pressure facing many companies across the market, the majority of companies in TCTC's portfolio with a cash flow underwriting continue to report positive EBITDA growth. We believe our portfolio is well positioned given our emphasis on companies and established business models that have a reason to exist and are core to their underlying customers. to make these companies more resilient through difficult macro environments. At quarter end, our portfolio had a fair market value of approximately $1.7 billion. Eighty-eight percent of our investments were senior secure debt spread across a wide range of industries, providing portfolio diversity and minimizing concentration risk. We also continue to emphasize companies in less cyclical industries. The portfolio at quarter end consists of investment in 143 companies, an all-time high for TCTC. And our average portfolio company investment was $11.6 million. As the chart on slide six of the presentation illustrates, our recurring income is distributed broadly across our portfolio and is not relying on income from any one company. In fact, more than 90% of our portfolio companies each contribute less our recurring income. 86% of our debt investments are first lien, providing substantial downside protection, and 94% of our debt investments are floating rate, an important benefit, of course, in this higher rate environment. Moving on to our investment activity, our deal source channel agnostic approach provides us an important advantage, particularly at a time when we are seeing a slowdown in traditional sponsored backed activity. Our industry-focused deal teams continue to identify unique investment opportunities from a wide range of sources, including directly through industry contacts and management teams. This is in addition to our traditional sponsor relationships. In reviewing these opportunities, we emphasize transactions where we are positioned as a lender of influence, which enables us to leverage our two decades of experience in negotiating deal terms and conditions that we believe provide meaningful downside protections. These include substantial collateral and tailored company packages. In addition, our industry specialization, which our borrowers truly value, bolsters our ability to assess and effectively mitigate risk in our underwriting and when negotiating terms in the credit documentation. Despite the more modest pace of market activity, TCPC invested $76 million in the first quarter. Deployment in the quarter included loans to eight new and two existing companies, primarily in senior secured loans. Follow-on investments in existing holdings continue to be an important source of opportunity for us, accounting for 45% of total dollars deployed over the last 12 months. TCPC's largest investment during the first quarter was a Unitronch investment to support the acquisition of World Choice Investments. World Choice owns and operates a diverse portfolio of live dinner and family entertainment attractions across the southern U.S. The company is strategically located in stable regional tourism destinations, including Pigeon Ford, Tennessee, in which it operates the Dolly Parton Stampede. This market benefits from tourists visiting Dollywood, but also the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, which is the most visited national park in the country. We viewed this as an attractive investment opportunity given the company's demonstrated and stable growth over the past 15 years, including steady performance during the great financial crisis due in part to its low fixed cost base and strong free cash flow generation. Over World Choice's 30 plus year history, they have consistently delivered high attendance and revenue growth, which has established them as the leading entertainment option with minimal direct competition in each of its core markets. Our second largest investment in the quarter was our first lien loan to support the acquisition of Finder. Founded in 2013, Finder is a leading digital asset management vendor. We viewed this investment as an opportunity to lend to a premium product and it's well positioned to benefit from strong tailwinds for products that enable sales, marketing, and commerce. We also view our loan as well covered, given strong visibility on cash flows and Finder's significant and diverse customer base. New investments in the first quarter were offset by total dispositions of $19 million. The overall effective yield on our debt portfolio increased to 13.1% compared with 9.1% one year ago, reflecting the benefit of higher base rates and wider spreads on new investments. Investments in new portfolio companies during the quarter had a weighted average effective yield of 13.3%, exceeding the 13.1% weighted yield on exited positions. Given further pullback in banks' ability to lend in this environment exacerbated by the regional bank turmoil in the first quarter, we are continuing to benefit from a more lender-friendly investment environment with improvements in both pricing and terms relative to just 12 months ago. Post-quarter end, we have seen a modest pickup in activity and have been investing selectively, maintaining our underwriting discipline while being mindful of the inflationary environment We emphasize companies that have significant pricing power to pass on higher input costs, including increases in their cost of capital. It's also important to note that we do not underwrite to perfection. We seek to build in sufficient buffers to ensure companies can withstand changes in the microenvironment, including higher costs, without impairing their ability to service our loan. Our pipeline remains healthy, and the yields on investments in our pipeline are generally in line with our current portfolio. To date, we've had limited prepayment income in the second quarter. Let me now turn it over to Eric to walk through our financial results as well as our capital and liquidity positioning.
spk08: Thank you, Phil. As Raj noted, our net investment income in the first quarter benefited from the increase in base rates since March of last year. Net investment income of 44 cents was up 29% versus the first quarter of 2022. and exceeded the first quarter dividend of 32 cents per share by 34%. Today, we declared a second quarter dividend of 34 cents per share, an increase of 2 cents per share over the first quarter dividend. This is our second dividend increase in the last three quarters. We remain committed to paying a sustainable dividend that is fully covered by net investment income, as we have done consistently over the last 11 years. Investment income for the first quarter was 87 cents per share. This included a recurring cash interest of 76 cents, recurring discount and fee amortization of 4 cents, and PIC income of less than 3 cents. Notably, PIC income was only 3% of total investment income. Investment income also included 2 cents of dividend income, a penny of other income, and a penny from prepayment premiums and accelerated OID and exit fees. As a reminder, we amortize upfront economics over the life of an investment rather than recognizing all of it at the time the investment is made. Operating expenses for the first quarter were $0.34 per share and included interest and other debt expenses of $0.20 per share. Incentive fees in the quarter totaled $5.4 million or $0.09 per share. Net realized losses for the quarter were $30.6 million, or 53 cents per share, resulting primarily from the reorganization of our investment in auto alert. However, given the stronger performance by auto alert over the last few months and the improved capital structure after the restructuring, our investment in auto alert had a net appreciation during the quarter and is now back on accrual status. Net unrealized gains in the first quarter totaled $28 million for 48 cents per share, primarily reflecting a 36.2 million reversal of previously recognized unrealized losses from the auto alert reorganization. Partially offset by a 3.2 million unrealized loss on our investment in Astra Acquisition and a 2.9 million unrealized loss in Adventiv. Then that increase in that asset for the quarter was $22.7 million for 39 cents per share. We have a robust valuation process and substantially all of our investments are valued every quarter using prices provided by independent third party sources. These include quotation services and independent valuation services. And this process is also subject to rigorous oversight. including backtesting of every disposition against our valuation. The credit quality of our overall portfolio remains strong. A total of only two portfolio companies were on non-accrual at the end of the first quarter, representing 0.3% of the portfolio at fair value and 0.5% at cost. Now turning to our liquidity. Our balance sheet positioning remains very strong. And we ended the quarter with total liquidity of $307 million relative to our total investments of $1.7 billion. This included available leverage of $208 million and cash of $99 million. Unfunded loan commitments to portfolio companies at quarter end equal 7% of total investments or approximately $109 million. of which only $34 million were revolver commitments. Our diverse and flexible leverage program includes two low-cost credit facilities, two unsecured no-issuances, and an SBA program. Last month, Fitch reaffirmed TCPC's investment-grade rating with a stable outlook. Our unsecured debt continues to be investment-grade rated by both Fitch and Ludi. Given the modest size of each of our jet issuances, we are not overly reliant on any single source of financing, and our maturities remain well-laddered. Additionally, we are comfortable with our current mix of secured and unsecured financing and do not have any immediate financing needs. Combined, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings increased modestly to 4.19%. This compares with 3.26% at the end of 2021. That is an increase of only 93 basis points over the last 15 months, while base rates increased approximately 480 points during that period. This is the result of having over 70% of our borrowings from fixed rate sources. Now, I'll turn the call back over to Raj.
spk07: Thanks, Eric. As a reminder, our annual shareholder meeting will be held virtually on May 24th, and all of our shareholders are invited to attend. Consistent with prior years and in line with many of our BDC peers, we have included in our proxy a proposal for shareholder approval to issue up to 25% of our common shares on any given date over the next 12 months at a price below net asset value. The purpose of the below NAV issuance proposed on our proxy is to provide flexibility. To be clear, at this point, we do not intend to issue equity below NAV, and certainly not unless it is accretive to our shareholders. This is the equivalent of an insurance policy which our shareholders have approved every year since we've been public. Even as the economic outlook grows increasingly uncertain and market volatility persists, we are confident in our proven strategy and approach to investing that has delivered strong risk-adjusted returns for our shareholders throughout different economic environments. We believe we have demonstrated a consistent ability to execute throughout the credit cycles, enabling TCPC to deliver for our shareholders both periods of economic growth and contraction. This also makes us a reliable partner for our borrowers and further helps us to attract appealing investment opportunities. And with that, operator, please open the call for discussions. Questions?
spk02: Absolutely. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. To remove your question, press star followed by two. And as a reminder, if you're using your speaker phone, please remember to pick up your handset before asking your question. Our first question comes from Robert Bott with Raymond James. Please proceed.
spk04: Hi, guys. On, if I can go to auto, obviously, they're called restructured. it was marked up in the quarter right so do you do you do you think how can i put it what's the restructuring too aggressive um since you you restructure it wrote off a lot converted to equity and then effectively immediately wrote the equity up um so can you give us any thoughts on on how it was repositioned and and was it restructured uh
spk07: I hear you saying I'll try to add a little color. I think the short answer is the restructuring, we hope, and from early indications, may prove to be good timing. This was a good business that had an impact coming out of COVID that was tied to supply chain issues, a fairly robust demand side for autos and used cars in particular. And that essentially resulted in it being able to mitigate its value proposition where they help dealers create demand and differentiate themselves when that's more valuable. So it was a good business, but really a challenge balance sheet by factors coming into this environment. The business, as we think about restructuring, the two kind of went in different directions. The business environment improved for it. Ironically, in this environment where there's more inventory on dealerships and supply chain issues abated, that helps them become more relevant again. And the trends are showing that out of the box. And similarly, the balance sheet that was a challenge was something that we were able to be part of a solution to fix. So I don't know that it was too aggressive. I think time will tell. Unless when you say aggressive, you mean in our favor. I do think that it was well-timed, that it was something that we try to avoid doing by finding and working in conjunction with the company and its owners to a solution. I think the nature of the restructuring being relatively quick and efficient after a number of other types of processes were in place does highlight the benefit of doing this when you're one of a few lenders or one of one. You can do this much more efficiently than a large-scale restructuring. But I think, you know, hopefully that what we're able to do is give the business the running room and the capital structure and liquidity to achieve its highest value, especially as those demand factors and economic factors are moving back in its favor.
spk04: Got it. Got it. Thank you for that additional comment. I mean, just the other one, so it's back on accrual now. Was it on accrual status for the full quarter, the partial quarter, or just back at the end?
spk08: It was right at quarter end. So there was no income recognized during Q1 from auto alert.
spk04: Got it. Thank you. And then the other one on credit quality, just to based on Phil's prepared remarks. You said the majority of companies have positive EBITDA growth. So presumably, you know, some don't. Obviously, the recurring revenue businesses is one thing. But you mentioned that we're underwritten on a cash flow basis. So can you give us any comments for that? Is that EBITDA decline for whatever proportion of businesses is, is that new? Is that, was that expected? Is that a result of macro or idiosyncratic issues? Anything we should be watching out for in the rest of the portfolio, I guess is the real question.
spk00: Yeah, thanks, Robert. So I would say that you're right. It was the majority, and it's a meaningful majority of our cash flow thesis loans have seen EBITDA growth. There are, of course, some businesses in our portfolio which have been impacted by what the Fed's doing. And the Fed's been very explicit about trying to slow growth. And the inflationary environment has been quite meaningful. And so not all companies are seeing EBITDA growth, just the vast majority. So are we concerned at this point? We feel like we have sufficient margin for error in these cash flow loans. And, you know, just because they, you know, they're seeing some either flat year of year or sequentially bizarre or in some cases down, you know, most of these situations are areas where we're terribly concerned or hit our watch list.
spk04: Got it. Thank you. That's it for me.
spk00: Thank you, Robert.
spk02: Thank you for your question. Our next question comes from Christopher Nolan with Latimer Thalman. Please begin.
spk03: Hey, guys. Have you guys had any discussions with your banks providing your facilities in terms of change of haircuts or change in terms?
spk08: No, we haven't needed to, and neither have they approached us regarding that.
spk07: Yeah, and just for some context, you know, our business, even before the TCP to its public has been doing leverage in the loans and facilities for over two decades. So I think we try to think about the right type of structures, flexibility, et cetera. So we're not on the wrong side of the banking discussions, but there have been no discussions to date.
spk03: Any consideration in terms of adding additional credit lines?
spk07: I think we are comfortable where we are in terms of the capital structure today. I think we're always in conversation with various providers for flexibility and additional thinking about diversifying the capital structure. So there will always be consideration of when and if that makes sense. But I would just emphasize the point that we feel very well covered today and are very appreciative of the banks we work with being good financing partners.
spk08: And we do have accordions in both of the facilities. One thing we do always look at is continuing to add perhaps other banks to the lineup within the facilities. So that's a regular thing we do.
spk03: One of the things that occurred in the last banking crisis was banks basically cut off the lines of credit. And I'm not saying that that's happening or it's going to happen. you know, just sort of as a insurance policy, would BlackRock, your parents, be able to backstop if the worst came to worst and the banks started cutting off credit lines?
spk07: I think that's a question I will not answer for BlackRock. I like my job here. But I would say that, you know, when you go back through the prior crises, The one thing I would say is that private credit assets have just held up very well. I mean, and BDC, even the marks to NAV, you know, have not dropped historically as much as other credit, you know, or even liquid asset classes. I think there's a benefit to the lockup structure and the permanent capital nature. There's a benefit to the way we underwrite that allows us to, you know, keep a good and healthy portfolio and take protective actions. I think our lenders see that historically and have seen our ability to protect their capital. So while I won't answer the question on the BlackRock side of it, I will say that historically, even in the worst crises, it wouldn't have been needed or wasn't needed. And we take encouragement that we can kind of conduct the business the same way and hope for the same type of protections going forward.
spk03: Sounds good. Thank you for taking my questions.
spk02: Thank you. Our next question comes from Ryan Lynch of KBW. Please proceed.
spk05: Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. First one I had, I know the deal opportunity environment is really strong today, you know, just with the availability of capital being a little bit limited out there. You guys, I think, already put out some really high-quality loans this quarter, I would guess, but Is there any point where you guys look at the balance leverage and look to manage the level of deployments based on your leverage range? And are we getting to that point yet?
spk07: So let me answer it this way. We have definitely, we haven't given formal targets on our leverage range. I think we've historically given some guidelines of where we're comfortable. We absolutely look to maintain buffer And in the leverage facilities, when we don't use leverage as part of our investment decision, it's really a portfolio optimization tool. I would say that the other thing we are very conscious of is maintaining the investment grade rating. We have a frequent, I think, healthy dialogue with the rating agencies. And so in the current environment, a couple of things. Given where we're underwriting, I think you can see that from the current portfolio and the new deals. Even the leverage we have, it's a great environment on an unlevered basis. And the leverage, I think, is helpful. But we are not going to push that in any way that compromises the balance sheet, the ability to protect our portfolio or our investment grade rating. And without giving formal guidance on a target range, I'll leave it at that for where we are levered today and how we're thinking about operating in the current environment.
spk05: Okay, that's fair enough. And then kind of flipping back to some of your prepared comments you kind of talked about with the current kind of mini banking crisis we have going on. I think you said it'll further reduce banks' willingness to lend to middle market companies. I would love to just hear you provide some more thoughts on two areas in regards to this. um how much today or in the past you know two years are you actually competing with banks for deals so the extent that banks pull back that would obviously be a beneficiary to you if you're if they're you know meaningful competitors you know in your space i'd love to hear how if at all banks are really in the space that you're competing with for deals uh that you're actually putting portfolio number one and then secondly on on the flip side you know, if banks do potentially pull back from lending, which is, I think, likely, how do you think that impacts your portfolio companies or borrowers that may have additional lines of credit outside of your debt with banks?
spk00: Thanks, Ryan. So I'll address the first part of the question. We do compete on occasion. directly with uh with banks those are more the i'd say regional banks who are committing and underwriting let's say loans of anywhere between two to three four hundred maybe in terms of tranche size and they'll you know they'll put together their their own solution and try and syndicate that deal out so that's one part of the market and that is part of the market given uh that we compete with given our focus on the core middle market Then there's another part of the market where the banks participate, and that's on the larger cap direct lending side. Clearly, the $1, $2, $3, $4 billion Unitron deals that you're seeing now that some of the large cap direct lenders are focused on, that is competing head-on with what the large cap banks would otherwise be doing. I would say that the regional side. Now, the likes of SBB and First Republic and so on, those aren't banks that typically trap in middle market direct lending, but there are certainly others that do on the regional side. And the fact that we expect them to be more constrained, either for their own risk management or from a regulatory standpoint, we think will benefit us. Even if those regional banks do come in the market, you know, we think it'll be perhaps they'll pull back on risk, maybe be less aggressive on quantum or terms, or maybe they'll want to do it on a best efforts basis, which obviously is less reliable for a borrower in terms of execution. And that's where direct lending comes into play, where we can provide certainty of execution And we've done that for the better part of two decades now.
spk07: Yeah, and I'll try the second part of the question. I think you were asking about if they pull back on, you know, revolvers and liquidity and things of that sort, you know, how does that impact companies? I think that, you know, if you think about what's happened with the banks over the last two decades, there was an effort, you know, my former employer, I was part of it as a learning experience to do what we do directly. And we're just not built for, you know, that long-term type solution. They were effective, and we've partnered with a lot of regional banks and others on the short-term revolvers and facilities, and I think that's been a good place for them. These are asset-backed, very, very well-protected, and essentially swing lines, if you will. To the extent they pull back from that business, which I think is really more their core competency and a big part of their relationship effort with companies, I think there will many many cases in the past with financing markets you know necessity will drive a creative solution and that may be something that we do you know as part of it maybe partnering with other types of parties um for you know for where we sit right now the cost of capital for those solutions is below our targets it wouldn't be appropriate for this business unless that changes but that doesn't mean there aren't you know private market solutions or some hybrid or something that comes up to the extent demand is there and there's a good place to obtain you know risk uh you know reward type type financing opportunities and that's happened time and time again i would imagine there'd be something like that that emerges it's just too early to tell it's also unclear where the banking sector ends up but i think them exiting that type of business would be a more wholesale change in their in their business model which we don't see or anticipate or even hear about uh in the current environment yeah and i'll just add you know one of the um
spk00: One of the things we've seen due to some of the pullback, especially from the larger banks, is that as our portfolio companies continue to grow, obviously they're making tuck-in add-on acquisitions. They're growing their cash flow tremendously, and they at some point may be ripe for a refinancing by one of the larger banks. But given what's going on, we expect them to stay in our portfolio longer, and we can continue to finance them. given that we know the business really well. And as you've seen, as we've talked about in the recent quarters, the amount of origination that we get out of our existing portfolio continues to be pretty high. I think it's 45% over the last 12 months. And that's partly due to us, the existing lenders, providing that solution for the borrowers instead of them going out and getting cheaper cost of capital from the banks in what would have been the case one or two years ago.
spk05: Okay, understood. I appreciate the time today. Thank you. Thanks, Ryan.
spk02: Our next question comes from Kevin Foulkes from JMP Security. Please proceed.
spk06: Hi, good morning, and thank you for taking my question. You know, just one question for me relating to Edmentum. You know, you've obviously seen the headlines around the adverse impact that AI is having on the online education space. You know, some publicly traded education platforms are down more than 60% year to date. I was curious if you could share your high-level thoughts on the impact that AI is having on Adventum's business model, if they're experiencing the same degree of disruption that other online education platforms are facing. I'm just trying to get a better understanding around the movement in fair value marks for the company and what the app gives as well. Thanks.
spk07: Yeah, I can give you some perspective because we've talked about it, and then time will tell. But I think if you think about what Adventum has successfully done in moving its business forward, Over time, it's made a big push from going from analog to digital. Obviously, that's where the market is going for at Tech. They've done a very good job, I think, proactively of going from broader-based assessment and targeted content to much more personalized assessment and targeted content to move students forward from where they are to a baseline or ahead of it. A big part of that value proposition going forward is the ability to do that very proactively and in a very targeted manner. And not surprisingly, some AI type of technology is actually additive to that. It makes it a more robust function. So the product set will certainly incorporate that. And Mentum as a company, I should let the CEO who's exceptional in this field speak to it directly. has even before AI became kind of the topic of the day, we're exploring incorporating that into their product set because that is where the market ultimately will go and will benefit from. But I think that makes it a better product, not a less relevant product. And that's one that I think will only enhance what they're doing on a personalized basis with students. How that ultimately rolls forward, I think time will tell, but from a point of view of the thinking at the company level, They've been thinking about AI and incorporating it for quite some time now, and I haven't tracked the other online education performance. I don't think they're necessarily comparative businesses, but at least from my perspective, it's something that would be additive to what they do, and they certainly see that that way as well.
spk06: Okay. I appreciate the insight, Raj, and congratulations on a nice quarter. Thank you.
spk02: Thank you for your question. There are currently no questions registered, so as a reminder, get a star one to ask a question.
spk07: Okay, we appreciate your participation on today's call. I would like to thank our team for all the continued hard work and dedication. I would also like to thank our shareholders and capital partners for their confidence and their continued support. Thanks for joining us. This concludes today's call.
Disclaimer