Arbor Realty Trust

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the second quarter Arbor Realty Trust Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during this period, you will need to press the star 1 on your telephone. If you want to remove yourself from the queue, please press the pound key. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. If you need operator assistance, I would now like to turn the call over to Tony O, Chief Financial Officer. Please begin, sir.

Okay, and welcome to the quarterly earnings call for Arbor Realty Trust. This morning, we'll discuss the results for the quarter ended June 30th, 2020 with President and Chief Executive Officer. Before we begin, I need to inform you that statements made in this earnings call may be deemed forward-looking statements that are subject to risk and uncertainties, including information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of our business. These statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of our future performance, taking into account the information currently available to us. Factors that cause actual results to differ materially from these statements are details in our SEC reports. Listeners are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of today. Arbor undertakes no obligation or circumstances after today or the occurrences of unanticipated events. I'll now turn the call over to Arbor's President and CEO, Ivan Kalk.

And thanks to everyone for joining us on today's call. We hope that you and your families are safe and healthy, and we appreciate your participation during these challenges that our country and the entire world continues to deal with from the effects of COVID. In addition, as we all know, we invented a recessionary period. After experiencing a 10-year run of tremendous economic growth, we as operators of this company were well prepared for the recessionary environment. We built a viable operating platform focusing on the right asset class with very stable liability structures. Strong liquidity, an active balance sheet, and GSE agency business, and many diversified income streams that generate strong core earnings and dividends in every market cycle. We also have nominal delinquencies and forbearances in our portfolio, an experience cycle tested management model that provides many diversified opportunities for growth, which clearly puts us in a class by ourselves. Our second quarter results are clear of the diverse platform we have developed. We had an outstanding second quarter achievements, including remarkable opportunities allowed us to increase our dividend to 31 cents a share. This is the ninth year in a row we have been able to increase our dividend, and we are confident in our ability to continue to generate core earnings in excess of this increased dividend. As Paul will discuss in more detail, the quarter was 46 cents per share. which is a remarkable accomplishment and a true testament to the value of our franchise we have created. In fact, the growth we are experiencing in our core earnings this year has already exceeded last year's pace. We realize significant benefits from our LIBOR floors, efficiencies in our CLO vehicles, GSE agency income from our residential business, overhead, and general and administrative expenses. And as a result of these reoccurring benefits, combined with our projected originations, strong pipeline, and the credit quality of our portfolio, we're uniquely positioned to continue to produce significant core earnings for the balance of the year despite the effects of the recession. The strong car earnings outlook has allowed us to once again increase our dividends in excess of this dividend. It reflects a 13% yield based on yesterday's closing price. Just a few months ago, in mid-February, we were trading at a much lower dividend yield, which applied to our current dividend. would result in a stock price of approximately $15.50 a share. And we believe, based on our resiliency and strong performance, that we should be trading above that level. As a result, we feel this is one of the best opportunities to create shareholder value in the history of our franchise. Through our GSC agency platform, We have been very active in providing liquidity in the multifamily market. We originated $1.35 billion in GFC agency loans in the second quarter and $2.2 billion for the first half of the year, which is up approximately 10% from our originations for the first half of 2019. Our pipeline is also extremely strong, and as a result, we expect to produce strong origination volumes for the balance of the year And this unprecedented platform offers a premium value as it requires limited capital and generates significant, long-dated, predictable income streams and produces significant annual cash flow. Additionally, our $21.6 billion GSE agency servicing portfolio, which is mostly prepayment protected, generates approximately $95 million a year and growing in reoccurring cash flow in addition to the strong gain-on-sale margins we continue to generate from our origination. The ability to originate and sell loans in a liquid market with minimal required capital and produce gain-on-sale income, as well as new and increasing servicing revenues, will continue to contribute greatly to our core earnings and dividends. From a liquidity perspective, we are very pleased to report that we have a current cash and liquidity position of approximately $450 million, which we believe not only provides us with adequate liquidity to navigate the current market conditions, but also gives us offensive capital to take advantage of accretive lending opportunities. We have been very successful in increasing our liquidity position growing it by approximately $100 million. In the second quarter, we issued $70 million of three-year unsecured debt, which continues to demonstrate the value of our franchise relationships. And we successfully executed our first private label securitization in the second quarter, totaling $727 million of assets, which generated approximately $115 million of cash after repaying the short-term debt associated with these loans. We have a very strong balance sheet portfolio and the appropriate liability structures. At June 30th, our balance sheet loan book grew to $5 billion and was financed with $3.4 billion of 2.5 billion or 75% of that debt is non-recourse, non-mark-to-market TLOs, and approximately $850 million is financed through warehouse and repurchase facilities that is secured by $1.2 billion of assets with eight different banks that we have long-standing relationships with. Additionally, the majority of loans being financed in these bank lines are also rated and CLO eligible. With respect to our balance sheet portfolio, very important to highlight that over 90% of our book are senior bridge loans. And most importantly, approximately 80% of our portfolio is in multifamily assets, which has been the most resilient asset class in all cycles. And we believe that will continue to outperform all other asset classes in this recession as well. Additionally, we have not provided any loan modifications with rate concessions or had any defaults to date related to our multifamily portfolio, and most of the loans in our portfolio contain interest reserves and or replenishment obligations by our borrowers, giving us the ability to effectively manage our portfolio effectively through this dislocation. We also have very little exposure to the asset classes that have been significantly affected by this recession, such as retail and hospitality. Our total exposure to these asset classes is less than $130 million, or approximately 2.5% of our portfolio. And as a reminder, we took adequate reserves against these assets in the first quarter I do not feel at this point that any material further impairments will be necessary, which gives us a confidence that our adjusted book value of $9.40 actually reflects the current impact of this recession. We continue to see positive trends related to our GSC agency business collections. with only approximately 0.4% of our $16 billion Fannie Mae book and 6% of our $5 billion Freddie Mac loan book granted forbearance through July. These numbers are relatively unchanged since April. We had very few requests forbearance in the last few months, which we believe reflects the strength of our borrowers and the quality of our GSE agency portfolio. With respect to servicing advances related to any potential forbearance claims, as a Fannie Mae servicer, we are required to advance principal and interest payments for a period of up to formally $700,000 cumulatively to date, which also not materially changed since last quarter. And as a reminder, we have a $50 million advance facility in place with one of our larger banks at a 100% advance rate. Therefore, any further potential advance requirements will not be an issue for us. Summary, we have built a versatile operating business that is multifamily-centric with significant diversified income streams and is capable of generating consistent core earnings and dividends in all cycles with a proven track record for growth. We also have a strong liquidity position the appropriate liability structures, and the asset management expertise and track record to continue to succeed in this environment, and our performance speaks for itself. We believe this puts us in a class by ourselves that investment in our company at these extremely low levels will provide a tremendous long-term return. And as the largest shareholder, my primary focus is will be to continue to maximize shareholder value. I will now turn the call over to Paul to take you through the financial results.

Okay, thank you, Ivan. As our press release this morning indicated, we had an exceptional quarter, producing core earnings of $60.4 million, or $0.46 per share, excluding $15 million of additional CISO reserves and $38 million of tax-affected one-time swap losses on our private label securitization from the effects of the pandemic. As Ivan touched on, we had several key items that affected the numbers very positively for the second quarter, including significant benefits from our LIBOR floors and efficiencies in our debt structures, substantial income from a residential banking joint venture, and reductions in our overhead and general administrative expenses, with these expense reductions totaling approximately $8 to $10 million annually, or $0.06 to $0.07 a share. And these second quarter results clearly demonstrate the value of our operating platform and the diversity of our income streams, and more importantly, gives us great confidence in our ability to convince. Our adjusted book value at June 30th was approximately $9.40 a share, adding back $80 million of non-cash general CECL reserves on a tax-effective basis. And as Ivan mentioned earlier, we're not expecting any material additional write-downs at this point, giving us confidence in our adjusted book value. Looking at our results from our GSE agency business in the second quarter, we generated $14 million of core earnings and approximately $1.4 billion in originations and $1.3 billion in loan sales. The margins on our second quarter GSE agency loan sales was 1.46%, including miscellaneous fees, compared to 1.49% for the first quarter. As Ivan mentioned, we closed our first Arbor Private label securitization in the second quarter. We accounted for this as a sale, which resulted in a gain on sale margin of around 1% on 727 million loan sales. We also have a robust pipeline, and we expect to produce strong origination volumes for the balance of the year. In the second quarter, we recorded $32 million of mortgage servicing rights income related to $1.2 billion of committed loans, representing an average MSR rate of around 2.69%, which was up significantly from a 1.73% rate for the first quarter, mostly due to a change in the mix of our second quarter loan production and from higher servicing fees on our Fannie Mae originations. Our servicing portfolio grew to $21.6 billion at June 30th, with a weighted average servicing fee of 44 basis points and an estimated remaining life of nine years. This portfolio will continue to generate a predictable annuity of income going forward of around $95 million gross annually, which is up approximately $10 million on an annual basis from the same time last year. Additionally, prepayment fees related to certain loans that have yield maintenance provisions was $3 million for the second quarter compared to $5 million for the first quarter. In our balance sheet lending operation, we grew our portfolio to $5 billion in the second quarter on $300 million in new originations. Our $5 billion investment portfolio had an all-in yield of 6.10% at June 30th compared to 6.35% at March 31st, mainly due to higher rates on runoff as compared at the new originations, and from a reduction in LIBOR during the quarter, which was largely offset by LIBOR flaws on a majority of our portfolio. The average balance in our core investments was up to $4.8 billion this quarter from $4.6 billion last quarter, mainly due to our first quarter growth The average yield in these investments was 6.16% for the second quarter compared to 6.77% for the first quarter, mainly due to more acceleration of fees from early runoff in the first quarter, higher interest rates on runoff as compared to originations, and from a reduction in LIBOR in the second quarter. Total debt on our core assets was approximately $4.5 billion at June 30th, with an all-in debt cost of approximately 3.14% compared to a debt cost of around 3.68% at March 31st due to a sharp reduction in LIBOR in the second quarter. The average balance on our debt facilities was up to approximately $4.5 billion for the second quarter from $4.25 billion for the first quarter, mostly due to the senior unsecured notes we issued late in the first quarter. and the average cost of funds in our debt facilities decreased significantly to approximately 3.26% for the second quarter compared to 4.11% for the first quarter due to a substantial reduction in LIBOR. Overall, net interest spreads on our core assets increased to 2.90% this quarter compared to 2.66% last quarter, mainly due to the positive effect of LIBOR floors on a large portion of our balance sheet portfolio. And our overall spot net interest spread was also up significantly to 2.96% at June 30th from 2.67% at March 31st, again, mainly due to the positive effects of LIBOR floors on our portfolio. Approximately 80% of our balance sheet portfolio have LIBOR floors between 1% and 2.5%, with an average LIBOR floor of approximately 1.9%. And if LIBOR continues to stay at its current level, these LIBOR floors will continue to have a meaningful positive impact on our net interest spreads in the future. The average leverage ratio on our core lending assets, including the trust preferred and perpetual preferred stock as equity, was up to 87% in the second quarter from 85% in the first quarter due to the timing of our new unsecured debt issuances. However, our overall debt-to-equity ratio on a spot basis was down to 3.1 to 1 at June 30th from 3.3 to 1 at March 31st, excluding general CECL reserves, due to the efficiencies in our CLO vehicles and using the proceeds of our unsecured debt issuances to pay down secured debt. Lastly, income from equity affiliates increased significantly during the quarter due to, as we mentioned earlier, substantially more income from our residential banking joint venture as a result of the historically low interest rate environment. This investment contributed approximately 10 cents a share on a tax-effective basis to our core earnings for the second quarter. We do believe this investment will continue to contribute meaningfully to our core earnings going forward, and again, the income from this investment further emphasizes the diversity of our income streams and acts as a natural hedge against declining interest rates, specifically earnings on our escrow balances. That completes our prepared remarks for this morning, and I'll now turn it back to the operator to take any questions you may have at this time. Operator?

Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. We do ask that you please pick up your handset to allow optimal sound quality. And we'll take our first question today from Steve Delaney with J&P Securities. Your line is open.

Thanks. Hey, and congratulations, guys, on a great quarter amidst this sea of uncertainty that we're facing. I'd like to – Paul, you closed with the resi business, and I'd like to start there. Obviously, a big part of the earnings beat in the quarter. I was just wondering, Ivan, you've had this business for some time, and I know you've got a background in the residential market, but can you just talk specifically about how that operation, that platform may have scaled up in the last year so that the contribution for your I think 22% interest has really increased, and obviously a lot of focus on that business with the Quicken IPO in the market. So if we could start there, I'd appreciate it.

Sure. First of all, it's a business, as you know, I have a tremendous history, and that's how I started my career very successfully. We invested in this business a number of years back. with the eye as a really good hedge against some of our other aspects of our business. And as you know, when rates go down, typically that business goes up, and it's a real good offset to the interest earnings on our escrow balances. And that's how we viewed it. Clearly, with a drop in these interest rates, we built that company to have real great capacity. And with that automated technology that we have, We're able to increase and scale up without a lot of overhead. And clearly with the drop in rates, our volume has increased and our margin has increased. But we're very confident that that runway is very positive for quite a bit of time given the interest rate cycle.

The name of the platform, somewhere I remember the name Seneca out there, but I didn't know whether that's accurate.

It's based on the name of Cardinal.

Cardinal. That's right. Yes. Okay. Well, I was wrong. Okay. Switching over to the structured business, a little surprising that that's continued as strong. Just looking around sort of the bridge loan business, the larger bridge loan business, it seems to have really shut down. And I'm just curious if you could comment on the nature of the borrower demand situation. It didn't appear to be any large loans because it's about 20 million transactions. I mean, excuse me, 20 transactions or about 15 million average size. But just maybe comments on the demand. Where are you seeing borrower demand for the bridge product?

Sure. First off, we were probably the only ones in the sector providing liquidity. So while there was not a lot of volume initially, you know, we were definitely active and taking advantage of the environment. So we were one of the few providers that existed in the market. We made a conscious call and not use our capital on bigger loans. So that was by choice. We planned approximately $100 million to $150 million a month, and we wanted to address a lot of clients rather than just do one or two deals. So that was by choice. We have tremendous stability structures, and we have what we consider to be offensive capital. we're scaling up in terms of the loan size that we do and how much volume we can handle. So, you know, wouldn't be surprised if you see, you know, some larger loans next quarter because we just have a different outlook going forward based on our capital and our liability structures and where the market is and how we're faring.

Great. Well, thanks for the comments, and, again, congratulations. Thanks, Steve.

And we will move next here to Stephen Laws with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Good morning. I echo the sentiment. I think you'll be in a small list of people that increased the dividend. You know, to follow up on Steve's question on the structured business, and maybe I think, Paul, you mentioned it in your presentation, prepared remarks, but, you know, seeing maybe new investments at lower returns than some stuff that's paying off, you know, does that do the LIBOR floors? I'm a little surprised that spreads on new investments haven't widened where you're not facing that reinvestment risk there. But can you maybe expand on that a little bit, you know, given the comment about lower, you know, lower returns on the new investments as that portfolio turns over?

Yeah, so... So let me give a little color on this. Our new investments are probably three percentage points higher than what we were originating to. But we definitely owe a significant drop in LIBOR and increasing the initial intended yields on those portfolios substantially. But we are doing extremely well on our new originations. but we're not picking up the benefit of LIBOR flaws to the same extent. Most of our loans have a 1% LIBOR flaw that we're originating now. So any drop in what we're originating, we're already capturing that. So there is a little bit of a differential, but the yield parameters on our new loans are very strong. But also keeping the structures which were in place and are in place are important. And we won't be able to obtain some of those efficiencies in the near term on the liability structure located, at least in the near term. But we're optimistic that as the market evens out and we have access to it soon, that we'll recapture some of that benefit. So the financing of those assets is a little bit more expensive. The yields are strong. But they don't have the benefit of the prior liability structures and the LIBOR flaws, but it's still a very attractive environment.

Great. And I appreciate the color on that, Paul. And thinking about the MSR margin, I think in your prepared remarks, you highlighted the 269, you know, strength really driven by a change in mix. And I believe you said a higher fee on the fanning volume. You know, do those look like shifts that are going to be in place here near term? And we're looking at a margin, you know, maybe not 270 every quarter, but north of 200? Or kind of can you give us any outlook, you know, on where you see that going? Maybe has mix changed since quarter end? Or how do you see that number for the balance of the year?

Sure. So it definitely had a lot to do with the mix, but also due to the servicing fees we're seeing on the new Fannie business. So a little color. In the second quarter of the mix of committed loans, because that's how we calculate the MSR rate, 90% of the committed loans were Fannie loans. In the first quarter, 50% of the committed loans were Fannie loans. It just was a different mix. but we think the mix will be more Fannie going forward. I don't know that it'll be 90%, but it'll certainly be a higher percentage. So that'll drive a higher MSR rate. And then also servicing fees we're seeing on new product are substantially higher than the servicing fees we were seeing a couple of quarters ago. And we do think that outlook continues at least for the next known where rates go and where spreads go. But right now, and we're seeing more of that volume. So we do think that maybe it's not 270 every quarter or 269, like you said, Steve, but it should be meaningfully above last quarter's number.

Great. Paul, Evan, I appreciate the comments. Thank you.

And we will take our next question from Rick Shane with J.P. Morgan. Your line is open.

Thank you. A little bit. about the execution on the 511 and the implications going forward. Obviously good to get a transaction done in this environment. I'm curious where that execution wound up in the current tape versus what you might have expected when you were original and what you would target on a go-forward basis. The second question is, the horizontal strip from the transaction. I want to make sure I understand where that is on the balance sheet because when we look at the structured product balance sheet, excuse me, when we look at the agency balance sheet, there was a modest increase in investments held or securities held to maturity. But I just want to make sure that that's what the difference is.

So this was the first Arbor private label that was issued in the market, and it was, from my knowledge, the first multifamily-only securitization animal. It was extremely well-received and doing it a little bit differently, and we were surprised at the level of demand. So I think it was pretty much in line with what we thought, but the reception and the appetite for a securitization like this is very, very well received. With respect to the financial issues, Paul, do you want to walk through them?

So, Rick, so you're right. We did retain the bottom tranche, as is required to do so, 5%. It was about a $63 million face. It's on the balance sheet at a fair value of around $37 million, and that's sitting in securities held to maturity. And obviously, as we own that product for the next nine and a half years, however long it's out there, it's a fixed-rate product, that we will clip our servicing coupon on the full stack, and we will get a yield on that investment. And assuming we get most of all of that principal collected back by the end of the life, the yield on that investment could be anywhere from 10% to 12% on an unlevered basis. But it's sitting in the securities health and maturity line on the balance sheet.

Okay, what I wasn't picking up is the discounted face value. So the way we should think about that in terms of contributing to income is a mix of coupon on that, but equally importantly, appreciating that discount. That's correct.

Okay, great.

Thank you guys very much.

Yeah, let me just give you one more aspect of color on the product because I This product was developed when there was some uncertainty as to the longevity of the agencies. And we felt it would be an outstanding hedge if we can create the ability to securitize multifamilies in the event that there was some level of cutback with the agencies. So we accomplished our goal of being able to do a securitization and be well-received. And we do believe if there is ever a cutback in the agencies in volume or mandate, that this would be a very viable product line and give us a huge strategic advantage in the marketplace.

Yeah, no, you're right. It's a good proof of concept. I am curious, in the current environment, do you plan to continue to originate at the levels you were sort of in the last year in anticipation? You talked previously about doing –

I think at this juncture we've slowed that only because our agency volume is so active, and that's a less active aspect of our business, and the agencies are really dominating the market. So we don't really need to push that button to the same level, but we will continue to originate just at a slower pace.

I appreciate that.

Thank you guys very much.

Thanks, Rick.

And we'll take our next question from Jade Romani with KBW. Your line is open.

Good morning, everyone. This is Ryan on for Jade. Just regarding the servicing portfolio. Hey, Paul. Regarding the servicing portfolio, do you have any data on the percentage of tenants that are benefiting from what we're facing on the stimulus front? I've been curious to get your thoughts on what the impact of a decline or non-renewal of the extended Unemployment insurance could be general in terms of credit performance.

Macro outlook and how we've approached it. Clearly, an enormous level of concern and the CARES Act really mitigated a lot of that concern. effort to be very strong with our borrowers and keep our baseline low, almost close to zero. It's almost unimaginable where our forbearance numbers are for Fannie Mae. They could be the lowest in the industry. So we think if we're not renewed to similar levels and people don't return to work and the unemployment rate, there'll be some stress. and we're prepared for that stress because our baseline is zero. So it could be a tough fall, but we believe we have a lot of room. I think you'll see a little bit of an increase, but the borrowers have put themselves in fairly good and strong positions, and they realize, too, that as the equity owners of their properties, that they're going to have to seek some additional capital during these times if there's a shortfall. One of the very key advantages is that since is the primary source of liquidity, most borrowers, they have to keep their loans current even if there is some fallback on the rent side. So I think we can manage through this, manage through it extremely effectively. And we have such a low baseline that even not a significant impact on our portfolio.

And just to clarify, 0.4% forbearance in the Fannie book, and was it 5% in the Freddie book? Yes. Six, yeah. Six. Six. Okay. Great. Thanks for that color. And then, you know, in terms of the agency origination strength, you know, continues to be very strong. How common is the probability of that? And do you have any data you can share on what percentage of your agency originations are driven by refi?

Just to comment on that, so that gives you a good outlook in terms of where the third quarter is going to be looking, and it continues to build on a day-by-day basis. A lot of the business is refi-driven, and there's a lot out there, and we think the refi business will continue. The purchase activity has been stalled to some degree, as is some readjustment between sellers and buyers, and a lot of people were really, I wouldn't say sitting on the sidelines, sitting at home and not actively. So I think that as that disconnect between buyers and sellers starts to level out and they see eye-to-eye, but with rates where they are, we're very optimistic that the refi business should continue. And if there's an augmentation by the purchase business, which we believe is beginning to occur, we're feeling very comfortable with the balance of the year.

And, Ryan, just to give you some numbers, Ivan gave you all the commentary. What we did in the first quarter was re-file 75 in the first quarter. So those are the numbers on the re-file business.

And just one last question on the balance sheet portfolio. It looks like you had, as well as in a retail loan, any color there on those particular assets there. And then with the provisions taken in the quarter, both on the balance sheet book and structured book, were those driven by general reserves or were any of those asset specific? Thanks.

Sure. So the two NPLs we had during the quarter you mentioned, one was a New York City hotel that we took a substantial reserve against in the first quarter. The other was a very small retail product that we also took a reserve against. So we're more than adequately reserved, we feel, on those assets. And it was kind of expected that that's where we'd be with those loans. As far as the reserves for the quarter, we did, I think, $15 million in total. It was about $2 $2 million on the agency book, about $12.5 million, $13 million on the balance sheet book, and the majority of all that was just general CECL reserves. We took our share of what we call specific reserves back in the first quarter on the assets we thought were significantly affected by the pandemic, as Ivan had in his commentary, and we've not seen any material change in reserves on those assets at all.

Great. Thanks, guys.

We will take our next question from George Bahamondes with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning, everyone, and thanks for taking my question. You know, similar question to some of the ones that were just asked, and, you know, since you've addressed those, I was wondering, you know, underwriting, how has that changed, you know, in this environment versus what it looked like before, you know, just given, you know, maybe tenants who are taking government assistance today, you know, and just kind of any thunder writing has changed as we maybe look to some, as the impact of government assistance wears off on multifamily assets.

So I believe the loans we're putting on now could be the best loans we ever put on in the history of the firm. I think there's a lot of structure in the loans for the agencies. They've implemented interest reserves anywhere from six months to 18 months for principal and interest and often taxes. So you have an enormous cushion that you never had before in the market, a 10-year up market. You had rent growth of 3% to 5% annually. You had to underwrite that and keep expecting that was going to occur. And so for the last 18 months, we had a tremendous amount of caution in that period. And I believe those last loans in expecting rent growth were probably ones that you needed to have a lot of caution. When we're underwriting loans today, not only do we have those reserves, but you're underwriting to a flat rent growth in a different environment, and you can proceed with a lot of caution. So I think the environment is very strong, but you go market to market, and you proceed with a lot of discipline. But I do believe that for the time being, we can proceed in a very conservative way, probably lower loan-to-values with interest reserves and conservative underwriting.

That's helpful. Thank you, Ivan. And that's it. Good.

Question from Lee Cooperman with Omega Family Office. Your line is open.

Thank you. Congratulations. You guys have done a terrific job in a very, very difficult environment. I want to focus a little bit on earning power and explain to me what the significance is of the $450 million of liquidity position you focus on. It seems to me that we're in an environment you should get larger spreads. We just reported core earnings of $0.46, and we have plenty of liquidity. What additional earning power do you think you could generate if you put that liquidity to work in this environment?

We'll both take it. Why don't you start, and then I'll go.

Sure. So, Lee, yeah, so we have put up a tremendous number in the second quarter of 46 cents. We talked about the earnings power from the residential business we have and how we think that will continue over the next several quarters. We do have $450 million of liquidity, as you cited. We do think some of that is offensive capital. And the levered returns we've been generating, as Ivan said, the yields are down a little bit because of where LIBOR is and the LIBOR floors, but we're getting big benefits on the debt side. And in the second quarter, the $300 million of loans we originated, we generated a 15% levered return on those assets. So we've not seen those kind of levered returns in several, several quarters. So I do think with the equity we have that we want to deploy into those structured loans, we can generate, you know, a load of mid-teens return all day long on those assets. Ivan, would you agree with that?

Yeah, I think, you know, mid-teens return on our balance sheet portfolio is definitely something that we can originate to. And as you know, it's not just the yield on those loans we put on our books. It's eventually creating an agency loan, which makes those yields exponential. So we use that mostly on multifamily bridge loans and mostly on multifamily bridge loans that convert into agency business. So we think we can continue to grow. You know, there's a lot of strength in our earnings.

our dividend and we feel very good with it. Congratulations. You've done a great job in positioning the company. I compliment you.

And I am showing that we have no further questions at this time. I'll turn to closing remarks.

Okay. Well, that concludes our remarks and we're truly pleased to be able to have this kind of performance in this environment in support of all our shareholders and, uh, It is remarkable that this is our ninth year in a row, as I mentioned in my script, of a dividend increase. And in this kind of environment, to be able to raise your dividend and raise your earnings is an amazing feat. I want to compliment my management team, my board of directors for their support, and I look forward to concluding what I think is going to be an outstanding 2020. Have a great day, everybody, and stay healthy. Take care.

This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.