This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Good morning and welcome to the AGRI Realty fourth quarter and full year 2021 conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touchtone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Ruben Treatman, Director of Corporate Finance. Please go ahead.
spk03: Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for AGRI Realty's fourth quarter and full year 2021 earnings call. Before turning the call over to Joey and Peter to discuss our record results for the year, let me first run through the cautionary language. Please note that during this call we will make certain statements that may be considered forward-looking under federal securities law. Our actual results may differ significantly from the matters discussed in any forward-looking statements for a number of reasons, including uncertainty related to the scope, severity, and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and the containment measures on us and our tenants. Please see yesterday's earnings release and our SEC filings, including our latest annual report or Form 10-K, for discussion of various risks and uncertainties underlying our forward-looking statements. In addition, we discuss non-GAAP financial measures, including core funds from operations, or core FFO, adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, and net debt to recurring EBITDA. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release, website, and SEC filings. I will now turn the call over to Joey.
spk05: Thanks, Ruben, and thank you all for joining us this morning. I am pleased to report that 2021 was another terrific year for our growing company. We achieved several notable milestones over the past 12 months, including but not limited to record investment activity of $1.43 billion, surpassing our robust volume in 2020. The addition of 294 properties to our growing portfolio, including six Walmarts, maintaining Walmart as our top tenant at 6.6% of annualized base rent. The completion of our inaugural preferred equity offering with extremely attractive pricing setting a non-PSA REIT record, surpassing $5 billion in equity cap while approaching $7 billion in total enterprise value. And most importantly, the investments in our team and our information technology infrastructure led by our proprietary Arc database have paid tremendous dividends. While our investment volumes were once again at record levels, our continued focus on best-in-class retailers was reinforced by nearly 70 percent of annualized base rents acquired being derived from investment-grade operators. Our disciplined approach is further demonstrated by the ground lease opportunities that we executed on during this past year. We added 93 ground leases to the portfolio, representing nearly 30 percent of annualized base rents acquired, and increasing our ground lease exposure to 14.3 percent of our total portfolio. Several notable ground lease assets were acquired during the year, including our second Wegmans in Persephone, New Jersey, nine long-term Wawa convenience stores, three Walmart and Sam's Clubs, a Lowe's in Ohio, and nearly 20 outlets to dominant power and grocery anchored centers. As a reminder, our ground lease portfolio derives 87% of rents from investment-grade tenants and is largely comprised of the company's preeminent retailers. We closed out the year with a strong fourth quarter, investing $315 million in 70 board properties across our three external growth platforms. Over 67% of annualized base rents acquired during the quarter were were derived from retailers with an investment-grade credit rating, while over 22% of annualized base rents acquired were derived from ground-leased assets. The 71 properties acquired during the fourth quarter were leased to 34 tenants operating in 18 distinct sectors, including general merchandise, home improvement, grocery, off-price retail, convenience stores, tire and auto service, auto parts, farm and rural supply, and dollar stores. The properties were acquired at a weighted average cap rate of 6.1%, and had a weighted average lease term of 10.1 years. We have entered 2022 with the largest pipeline in the history of the company. As disclosed in our December prospectus supplement, included in our pipeline are two portfolio transactions, including the largest portfolio the company has ever pursued. This portfolio is comprised of over 50 properties for an anticipated purchase price of more than $180 million. The first tranche of the transaction has closed and the second tranche is anticipated to close during the first quarter of this year. The portfolio has a weighted average lease term of nearly 10 years and derives approximately 90% of annualized base rent for investment grade retailers. In addition, we are currently under contract on a portfolio of three high performing Walmart 2%ers and a Home Depot store. While these portfolios demonstrate our capability to execute on larger scale transactions, They are incremental to the more granular activity that is characteristic of our traditional acquisition volume. As indicated by our initial guidance of $1.1 to $1.3 billion, we are extremely confident in our team's ability to aggregate high-quality opportunities comprised of leading omnichannel retailers. As mentioned, at year-end, our portfolio's investment-grade exposure stood at 67%, representing a two-year stacked increase of more than 880 basis points. Our focus on best-in-class retailers will continue, as we do not believe it's prudent to move up the risk curve in a dynamic retail environment. Moving on to our development and partner capital solutions platforms, both platforms are seeing increased opportunities of expanding and sizable pipelines. We anticipate both of these platforms to produce outsized activity this year, as we focus on driving incremental value by leveraging all of our real estate capabilities and relationships. While still quite early in the year, I would anticipate commencing between $50 and $100 million through our development and PCS platforms during 2022. For comparison, we had seven development and PCS projects either completed or under construction during 2021 that represented total capital committed of approximately $40 million. Four of those projects were completed during this past year, representing total investment volume of $31 million. Construction continued during the fourth quarter on the company's third project with Gerber Collision in Newport, Ritchie, Florida. The company's first development was 7-Eleven in Saginaw, Michigan, and our second Gerber project in Poober, Georgia. Dispositions during 2021 remained consistent with prior years as we sold 18 properties for total gross proceeds of $58 million. These dispositions were completed at a weighted average cap rate of 6.4%. Notably, we sold six franchise restaurants during the year, reducing the company's franchise restaurant exposure to less than 1% of annualized base rents. Our asset management team remains diligently focused on addressing our upcoming lease maturities. As a result of these efforts, at year end, our 2022 lease maturities stand at just 0.5% of annualized base rents, representing a year-over-year decrease of approximately 80 basis points. During the fourth quarter, we executed new leases, extensions, or options on approximately 256,000 square feet of gross leaseable area. For the full year 2021, we executed new leases, extensions, or options on over 603,000 square feet. Notable new leases, options, or extensions included a new 15-year lease with Gardner White Furniture for the former Art Van flagship store in Canton, Michigan, as well as a new 15-year lease with Burlington in Mount Pleasant, Michigan for the former JCPenney space. As of December 31st, our rapidly growing retail portfolio consisted of 1,404 properties spread across 47 states. This represents an approximately 24% increase in total property count over the course of the year. The portfolio remains nearly fully occupied at 99.5%. As evidenced by our increasing investment grade exposure, our expanding ground lease portfolio, and our minimal near-term lease rollover, our portfolio is better positioned than it has ever been. With a balance sheet to match, I envision 2022 being another significant year for our company. Before I turn the call over to Peter to discuss our financial results, I'd like to highlight the announcement of our new corporate headquarters. As previously announced, we recently closed on the acquisition of a former art van furniture store on Woodward Avenue here in Royal Oak, Michigan. This building offers a unique redevelopment opportunity to create a state-of-the-art space for our growing team. Plans call for additional training in development space, health and wellness facilities, and collaborative meeting areas aligned with our ADC University and ADC wellness initiatives. Construction is anticipated to commence during the second quarter of this year, with a targeted move-in date during the first half of 2023. With that, I'll hand the call over to Peter, and then we can open it up for questions.
spk04: Thank you, Joey. I'll start by providing an update on our balance sheet and capital markets activities during 2021. We had another very active year in the capital markets, raising a record of $1.9 billion to fortify our balance sheet and position us for continued growth. In addition to external capital raised, we also generated nearly $100 million during the year via asset sales and free cash flow after the dividend. Adjusting for the impact of the transition to a monthly dividend during the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in 14 months of dividends being paid during the year, this figure would have been closer to $120 million. We anticipate that our increasing free cash flow after the dividend will be a valuable source of capital as we continue to grow. We completed several notable capital markets transactions during the past year, including the sale of almost 16 million common shares for total gross proceeds of approximately $1.1 billion via three follow-on equity offerings, one of which was on a forward basis, as well as the forward ACM program. The completion of a dual tranche public bond offering for $650 million at a blended all-in rate of 2.1%, including the forward starting swaps that were terminated at the time of the transaction. This transaction allowed us to repay all $240 million of our unsecured term loans and reduce our weighted average interest rate to 3.2% while extending our weighted average debt maturity. Our inaugural preferred equity offering for gross proceeds of $175 million at a four and a quarter coupon a record for REITs aside from public storage. Lastly, in December, we amended our revolving credit facility, increasing the capacity from $500 million to $1 billion. The facility includes an accordion option that allows us to request additional lender commitments up to a total of $1.75 billion. We also extended the term of the facility and reduced our cost to borrow by five basis points based on our current credit ratings and leverage ratio. As a result of our capital markets activities, our balance sheet is exceptionally well positioned to start the year and affords us tremendous flexibility. We had over $1.4 billion in liquidity at year end, including cash on hand, a largely undrawn revolver, and almost $520 million of net proceeds available to us from our outstanding forward equity. Additionally, consistent with our hedging strategy, we have previously entered into $300 million of forward starting swaps in contemplation of a future long-term unsecured debt issuance. effectively fixing the base rate at approximately 1.7 percent. Together with our outstanding forward equity, we have hedged the cost of more than $800 million of capital to fund this year's investment activity. When considering free cash flow after the dividend, as well as disposition proceeds, the majority of our capital needs for the year have been satisfied. Our significant liquidity, more than $800 million of hedged capital, and a robust pipeline gives us confidence that we can achieve high single-digit AFFO per share growth in 2022. Building upon our nearly 10% AFFO per share growth in 2021, this implies two-year stacked growth in the high teens. We view this level of per share growth as very compelling when combined with our best-in-class portfolio and our fortress-like balance sheet. Our net debt to recurring EBITDA stood at 4.9 times on December 31st, or 3.4 times pro forma for the settlement of our almost $520 million of outstanding forward equity. At year end, total debt to enterprise value was approximately 24.5%. Fixed charge coverage, which includes principal amortization and the preferred dividend, remained at a company record 5.2 times. As demonstrated by these metrics, our balance sheet remains a consistent source of strength for our company as we navigate uncertainty in the capital markets. And as Joey mentioned, we are very well positioned to fund our robust pipeline without reliance on the capital markets. Moving to earnings, Core FFO was $0.92 per share for the fourth quarter and $3.58 per share for full year 2021, representing 10.2% and 10.9% year-over-year increases, respectively. AFFO per share was $0.91 for the fourth quarter and $3.51 for the full year, representing 9.2% and 9.7% year-over-year increases, respectively. On a quarterly and full-year basis, Core FFO per share and AFFO per share were impacted by dilution related to our outstanding forward equity offerings. In accordance with GAAP, Treasury stock is to be included within our diluted share count in the event that, prior to settlement, our stock trades above the deal price from the offerings. The aggregate dilutive impact related to these offerings was less than half a penny to both core FFO and AFFO per share for the fourth quarter, and approximately one penny for the 12-month period. Our consistent and reliable earnings growth continues to support a growing and well-covered dividend. During the fourth quarter, we declared monthly cash dividends of 22.7 cents per common share for each of October, November, and December. On an annualized basis, the monthly dividends represent a 9.8 percent increase over the annualized dividend from the fourth quarter of 2020. For the full year, the company declared dividends of just over $2.60 per share, an 8.3 percent year-over-year increase, and a 14% increase on a two-year stack basis. Our payout ratios for the fourth quarter and full year remained at or below the low end of our targeted range of 75% to 85% of AFFO per share. Subsequent to quarter end, we declared monthly cash dividends of 22.7 cents per common share for January and February. The monthly dividends reflect an annualized dividend amount of $2.72 per share or a 9.7% increase over the annualized dividend amount of $2.48 per share from the first quarter of 2021. As in years past, and sticking with our consistent dividend policy, investors can anticipate our monthly dividend to grow at or just below AFFO for the upcoming year, indicating significant dividend growth once again. General and administrative expenses in 2021 totaled $25.5 million. G&A expense was 7.5% of total revenue, or 7% excluding the non-cash amortization of above and below market lease intangibles. For 2022, while we continue to support our growing organization, we expect that G&A expense will continue to scale, decreasing between 20 to 50 basis points as a percentage of total adjusted revenue. Lastly, Income tax expense for the full year 2021 totaled $2.4 million. For 2022, we anticipate total income tax expense to be in the range of $2.5 million to $3.5 million. With that, I'd like to turn the call back over to Joey. Thank you, Peter. At this time, operator, we'll open it up for questions.
spk00: We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then 1 on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then 2. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. And our first question will come from Wes Galladay of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk06: Hey, good morning, everyone. I'm actually at Baird. I have a quick question on the developer PCS program going to $50 to $100 million. Can you talk about the relative economics of the yield that you're going to get on those deals, and how big would you like that pipeline to get?
spk05: Hey, good morning, Wes. Relative yields for the development and PCS programs are in line historically with what we've talked about, 100, 250 basis point spreads over market cap rates. Our expectation for that program is to continue to ramp throughout the course of this year. We think we'll see significant activity during the first quarter in terms of starts as well as Q2, but we have some programmatic relationships that we're focused on. that we're excited to roll out and that have already begun putting shovels in the ground there.
spk06: Got it. And are you getting new relationships out of this expansion of the program?
spk05: I'd say we're really, our focus is working on, working with our existing tenant base, the sandbox of retailers we always refer to that are now in either growth phase or looking at high priority relocations. But a number of them have approached us to really assist them in their growth ambitions. really throughout the country.
spk06: Got it. And then when we look at this pipeline that you have right now, the $1.2 billion at the midpoint of guidance, how much of that will be the more granular acquisitions versus the, I guess you did highlight a few of the small portfolios.
spk05: It's a great question. We'll have to see as the year continues to transpire. Given the disclosure and the pros up in the commentary today, we have approximately $260 million between the two portfolios, the first tranche of The $180 million portfolio I've already closed. So about $260 million in those two portfolios alone. I'll tell you there are other portfolios that we are working on currently. But at the end of the day, we don't rely on portfolio-level activity. The more granular approach is our day-to-day, but we'll be prepared from a balance sheet as well as a human capital position to execute on anything that comes our way.
spk06: Got it. Thanks for the question.
spk05: Thanks, Wes.
spk00: The next question comes from Brad Heffern of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk07: Hey, good morning everyone. I was wondering if they were going to say I was with Baird. Cost of capital is obviously higher than it was a couple months ago. I know you've locked in most of the capital for this year, but can you pursue the same types of opportunities and still generate attractive spreads on a longer term basis?
spk05: Well, I think it's, as you mentioned, we have $520 million, and Peter detailed in the prepared remarks, $520 million of forward equity, $300 million of forward starting swaps on the debt side at approximately 1.7% as a 10-year base rate. And so from a capital position, we are very well capitalized. And our overall hedging policy continues to pay dividends. So We're very pleased that we completed the follow-on offering in December. We feel like we've taken most of our capital needs off of the table for the year. You know, you include a significant amount of free cash flow after the dividend plus disposition proceeds, and we're in great position to execute on our pipeline.
spk07: Okay, got it. Maybe trying it a different way. I mean, do you think that cap rates eventually are going to start adjusting to these higher rates, and how long do you think that will take?
spk05: That's the difficult question. I think here with the 10-year approaching 2%, historically there is causation between cap rates and the 10-year U.S. Treasury. Usually it has a lag of three to six months, and we haven't started to see cap rates materially move up yet, but my expectation is that cap rates will follow like they have historically the 10-year Treasury. So I think we're in a good position, not only given our balance sheet liquidity position today, but also to execute on the latter half of the year.
spk07: Okay. Thank you.
spk00: Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star, then 1. And our next question will come from Linda Tessai of Jefferies. Please go ahead.
spk02: Hi. Good morning. In terms of the $180 million portfolio, how does the cap rate for this compare to the weighted average cap rate of 6.1% in 4Q?
spk05: Yeah, good morning, Linda. We talked about that during the transaction in December. That cap rate is just south of where we've transacted historically in this quarter. Given the composition of that portfolio being 90% investment grade, really tenants that fit within our wheelhouse and just the synergies and obviously reduce frictional costs. We thought that was appropriate. But we also see additional opportunities that will pull that cap rate back up, but we anticipate printing a six or north for Q1 in terms of acquisition volume, and it will definitely be a robust quarter for us.
spk02: And then you mentioned there's high-quality tenants within that portfolio. Are there any other new tenants that you would be acquiring?
spk05: In that portfolio? Yes. There's a couple miscellaneous tenants in there that we'd be acquiring that would potentially be dispositions, but they're fairly de minimis. The bulk of that portfolio fits extremely well within our top college 15 tenant roster.
spk02: Thanks. Could you just remind us what your bad debt expectation would be in 2022? And then just a follow-up is, you know, in this improving credit environment, are there new tenant types that you're looking at?
spk04: So, Linda, with respect to our bad debt expectations for 2022, we specifically identify potential bad debt issues based on our assessment of recoverability with any troubled tenants. There are no significant outstanding balances for which we haven't already recorded a reserve. So pending any developments with existing tenants, we don't anticipate any meaningful bad debt expense in 2022.
spk02: Thanks. And then just in terms of the better credit environment, are there new tenants that you're looking at?
spk05: I would say our sandbox remains fairly constant. There's always tenants that we'll look at for minority investments or they're on the fringe of that sandbox that we monitor. Historically, that had been tenants such as Boot Barn where we've done a number of transactions. We'll continue to monitor. I think given the surge sale The surge sales of the pandemics and the adjustments to some of the balance sheets, that will prove to be temporary as we continue to migrate toward a true omni-channel future. So while we see improved balance sheets with some weaker performers pre-COVID, some of whom have gone public and were able to execute on an initial public offering, our focus is still going to be on those leading operators that everybody's familiar with that we consistently transact with.
spk02: Got it. Thank you.
spk05: Thanks, Linda.
spk00: The next question comes from Josh Dennerlin of Bank of America. Please go ahead.
spk08: Hey, guys. Hope everyone's doing well. Joe and Peter, just maybe kind of big picture, how are you thinking about capital raising in a rising interest rate environment? And is there any kind of maybe shift or anything you would lean into?
spk05: Well, the good news is we don't have to think about capital raising in this type of environment today, given the December offering and just the position of the balance sheet, the expanded credit facility, the swaps that we have in place. And so we think we're most important in this business, we think, is to have the capital to deploy with meaningful spreads in an external growth strategy such as any net lease company. That said, we'll consistently, and I'll throw in there, too, the execution of our inaugural preferred four and a quarter last year looks extremely attractive from our perspective. So I think we'll take advantage, and I'll let Peter follow up with anything else. We'll take advantage of opportunistic capital when it's out there, whether that be common equity, debt, or preferred. But most importantly, our balance sheet, as discussed at length in here, is a fortress. And so it will continue to be able to enable our growth trajectory and execute on the robust pipeline that we see that we have, frankly, today to execute on. Peter?
spk04: Yes, Josh. I'd just add, look, we're always evaluating the capital markets to determine what's the most efficient and effective way for us to raise capital to support our continued growth. As Joey mentioned, the balance sheet is in excellent shape today. And, you know, I think it's evidence that we will look for alternate ways to raise capital, you know, as evidenced by the preferred equity offering we completed last year to fund growth. But we're always going to evaluate all options available to us with respect to any particular capital risk.
spk05: One other thing I would add there, Josh, is we have never believed in just-in-time funding. At times we've been criticized for being under-levered. But in an external growth business that's growing on a relative and absolute basis, As quickly as this company is just-in-time funding, to me means a just-in-time potential problem. And so whether it's the use of forward equity or forward starting swaps on the debt side, we always want to maintain our balance sheet as that offensive line. I understand people will say you're under-levered at times. Well, my response to that is it's very easy to increase leverage. It is not painful to increase leverage as it is to de-lever the balance sheet. It is a lever that we can pull in the future if we feel that it's appropriate or the cost of respective capital we aren't aligned with. But I think the just-in-time funding, as we have proven time and time again in this space, can lead to disastrous consequences. And so we're very happy with the December raise. We're very happy with our position from a financial perspective today.
spk08: Great. Thank you, guys.
spk05: Thanks, Josh.
spk00: The next question comes from Teo Ocusanya of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.
spk01: Yes, good morning, Joey and team. My question is kind of more of a high-level question. Again, balance sheet in great shape, real focus on investment, great tenants, and higher tenant credit quality, and all that's great, but I'm just kind of curious, again, you paint a positive picture of, you know, the retail backdrop with some of your comments. You have peers, again, who are still kind of, you know, further out on a risk curve, you know, not doing quite as much investment grade, higher leverage, things like that. And the street seems to be rewarding their stocks quite a bit with their premium valuation over yours. Just kind of curious, like, Why do you think that's happening and what do you think really changes that? Is it rising rates that result in tenant credit blowups or just kind of trying to get a sense of why do you think that's happening?
spk05: Well, it's a great macro question. I think we'll look back on the last two years one day and historically understand maybe contextually what's actually occurred. But if we look at the recession caused by the pandemic and then we look at the reacceleration and the recovery of this economy led by monetary and fiscal policy, as well as the rapid development of vaccines that had never been heard of before. I think all investors are out there, frankly, looking around and saying what, you know, trying to get their own bearings. That said, we don't believe that the pandemic and or the recovery has changed the risk profile of sectors underlying real estate or single purpose buildings. And so those risk-adjusted returns we don't think make sense in an omni-channel world. I think I've mentioned this before on earnings calls or at least with investors in numerous meetings. In 10 years, I don't believe my children are going to remember whether Walmart started as a brick-and-mortar store or Amazon started as an e-commerce retailer. And so we see the world converging. We think we've done a good job in terms of the rethink retail strategy on the website and the white papers articulating that. But we just don't see it appropriate to go up the risk curve. What we see again this morning with Lowe's print and Walmart's print, I believe it was late last week or earlier this week, is the big retailers who have the capital to invest in an omni-channel strategy in price, in labor pressure, in their distribution. Logistics networks are going to continue to thrive in this world because they have the resources from a financial perspective to invest. And we think that is absolutely critical. So we're going to focus on our strategy, investing in the best and brightest retailers in this country that we think are going to survive for not only years but for decades to come. This is a long-term business. We sign long-term leases or acquire subject to long-term leases. Our full expectation is those tenants are there to pay their rent for the duration of their base lease, base term of their lease, and it is extended by options.
spk01: That's helpful. And then second question, just around, again, the land deal, just kind of curious how much opportunity you're seeing on that side and ultimately, you know, the target of how big that becomes as part of the portfolio. I think it's about 14% now. I don't know whether your goal is 20%, 25% in three years. Yeah. Yeah.
spk05: No real goal. Those opportunities ebb and flow. They come from the same sourcing and origination mechanisms as the remainder of any opportunities. It's just a different lease structure. We found tremendous opportunities. We highlighted some of them, the Wegmans in Percipiti, the Aldi portfolio we acquired, the Wawa's. I believe it was nine Wawa's on-ground leases where the tenant has invested significant capital in the improvements in the buildings. Those opportunities truly ebb and flow effectively. There's no long-term goal for that portfolio. It's approximately $50 million in NOI today. As we mentioned in the prepared remarks, almost 90% investment grade. It's extremely unique. We'll continue to execute on those opportunities, but as we've mentioned before, we're not going to reach in terms of pricing or drive cap rates down. And so they'll ebb and flow. They're typically one-off opportunities that we'll transact on. Great. Thank you.
spk01: Thanks, Kyle.
spk00: This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Joey Agri for any closing remarks.
spk05: Well, thank you everybody. We look forward to seeing everybody hopefully in person during the upcoming conference season. I appreciate everybody's time. Thanks again.
spk00: The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation and you may now disconnect.
Disclaimer