This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
5/5/2022
Good morning and welcome to the Air Products second quarter earnings release conference call. Today's call is being recorded at the request of Air Products. Please note that this presentation and the comments made on behalf of Air Products are subject to copyright by Air Products and all rights are reserved. Beginning today's call is Mr. Simon Moore. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, Jess. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Air Products Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Results Teleconference. This is Simon Moore, Vice President of Investor Relations, Corporate Relations, and Sustainability. I am pleased to be joined today by Shafi Ghasemi, our Chairman, President, and CEO, Dr. Samir Surhan, our Chief Operating Officer, Melissa Schaefer, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Shawn Major, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary. After our comments, we will be pleased to take your questions. Our earnings release and the slides for this call are available on our website at airproducts.com. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please refer to the forward-looking statement disclosure that can be found in our earnings release and on slide number two. In addition, throughout today's discussion, we will refer to various financial measures. Unless we specifically state otherwise, when we refer to earnings per share, EBITDA, EBITDA margin, the effective tax rate, and ROCE, both on a company-wide and segment basis, we are referring to our adjusted non-GAAP financial measures, adjusted earnings per share, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted effective tax rate, and adjusted return on capital employed. Reconciliations of these measures to our most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found on our website in the relevant earnings release section. Now, I'm pleased to turn the call over to Sethi.
Thank you, Simon, and good day to everyone. Thank you for taking time from your very busy schedule to be on our call today. I want to begin by saying a few words regarding Air Products' response to the current situation in Eastern Europe. We are deeply concerned by the human tragedy in Ukraine and the impact that this conflict has on the world. We condemn this aggression and encourage all efforts for peace. Our hearts go out to those affected and we are continuing to support our employees in this region. As a company, we are providing humanitarian support, including assistance to the International Committee of the Red Cross from the Air Force Foundation. Our employees have also responded with care and generosity, reaching out to their affected colleagues and making contributions to various organizations supporting relief efforts. Our presence in Ukraine is minimum with about $5 million in sales last fiscal year. And we have suspended the development of a small air separation unit in the country. Our business in Russia is also very small with less than $25 million in sales last fiscal year. We are in the process of exiting Russia and will stop doing business in that country. Now, before we get into the details, I want to thank each and every one of our 20,000 employees around the world for their hard work, commitment, and dedication to operational excellence and to serving our customers. Last quarter, Despite the very difficult conditions caused by war, significant inflation in energy costs, supply chain disruptions, and lingering effects of the COVID-19 virus, our people delivered strong results with an earning per share of $2.38, which is 14% higher than the previous year. As always, our people's commitment and dedication is our competitive advantage as we move forward. Now please look at slide number three, focusing on safety, which is our highest priority. Our second quarter safety performance was similar to last quarter, but still behind last year. Although we are proud of the fact that we have made significant progress in this area over the past few years, this result is not acceptable. Our goal remains zero accidents and zero incidents, and we are committed to achieving that goal across the organization. The slides number four through number seven include our goal, our management philosophy, and our five-point plan for moving forward. And we have also included our higher purpose slide to explain what we are trying to do every day when we come to work. We have shared these slides with investors many times before, but we always have them as part of our package to emphasize the point that these are the principles that we will follow every day and they will continue to guide us as we move forward.
As we have explained to our investors in the past,
Our strategy for moving forward is based on two pillars. The first is absolute excellence in running our existing industrial gases business. That is, to operate with the greatest efficiency and productivity, invest and maintain our market share, and improve pricing to compensate for inflation. Our results that we have just announced confirm that we are successfully implementing this strategy since we are delivering strong results under very difficult and challenging circumstances. The second pillar of our strategy for the future is to take advantage of our unique technologies and expertise to be a meaningful player in the significant worldwide effort to transition to clean energy. Specifically in this area, we are focused on developing and executing mega projects to produce blue and green hydrogen and other sustainable fuels for the world. In summary, This explains the content of the almost $20 billion of projects that we have in our backlog. And there are more of these projects to come. In the second quarter of fiscal year 22, we announced projects that confirm in a significant way our commitment to these two strategic pillars. First, in our base business, as you can see on slide number eight, we announced $1.3 billion of investment in two major projects for the electronic industry. These are real mega projects with long-term take-or-pay contracts with some of the largest semiconductor manufacturers in the world. We are proud to be executing these projects that confirm our significant position in the semiconductor industry. As related to the second pillar of our strategy, as you can see on slide number nine, we announced that we are building a $2 billion facility in Southern California to convert a conventional refinery to one that produces sustainable aviation fuel. called SAF. This facility will use as its raw material renewable organic material, such as base cooking oil, animal fats, et cetera, and use substantial amount of hydrogen to convert these raw materials to fuel for airplanes. The total capacity of this plant will be approximately 340 million gallons per year. Although this sounds like a big number, in 2019, world jet fuel consumption was more than 100 billion gallons. The world airlines are looking to decarbonize. Major corporations in the world are focused on reducing the carbon emissions generated by their airline business travel. And there are already significant incentives in place to encourage the move toward sustainable aviation fuel. This is the fundamental reason aligned with our strategy to pursue this opportunity. We started developing this project three years ago in partnership with Board Energy, a private company that is currently the leading producer of sustainable airline fuel. Our agreement is that Air Products will engineer, build, and own the facility, and Board Energy will provide the raw material. Board Energy will also sell the product and has a contractual commitment to pay air products a fixed fee that ensures an acceptable return on air products investment. We are very excited about this project since it also uses a significant amount of hydrogen that we can supply from our established and extensive hydrogen pipeline in Southern California. Our partner in this project, World Energy, is a private company. So I know and fully appreciate that there is little information available about them in the public domain. We have permission from the principals of the company to disclose the following information, which can be found on slide number 10. This information is self-explanatory and we are delighted to work with Old Energy on this great project. I'd just like to point out that on the bottom of slide number 10, we have included sales and profitability numbers, 400 million sales of 54 million of profit. That is just for the product that Old Energy sells out of the Paramount refinery that we are converting today. In addition to that, World Energy has the capacity in their other plants in America and Canada to produce 150 million gallons a year of biodiesel. The sales number and profitability of those numbers are not disclosed. I also want to report to you at this time that we continue to make good progress in building and bringing on the stream key mega projects that they have already announced. Slide number 11 highlights the major projects that they expect to bring on the stream in 2023. Now, I would like to take a moment to reflect on our performance over the past eight years. In July 2014, During my first conference call with investors as Chairman, President, and CEO of Air Products, I promised the shareholders that our goal was to deliver over the long term a 10% per year average cumulative growth in Air Products earning per share. On slide 12, you can see that for the past eight years, we have delivered more than what we promised eight years ago. And our goal for the future is to continue to deliver similar results as we move forward. On slide 13, you can see that we have shared the positive growth with our investors and increased our dividend on average 10% per year over the last eight years. And finally, please turn to slide number 14. It's still my favorite slide. It shows our EBITDA margins since 2014. Despite all of the turmoil in the world, significant energy, cost inflation, and supply chain disruptions, our EBITDA margin last quarter was almost 1,000 basis points higher than in 2014. Now it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Melissa to discuss our results in more details. Melissa?
Thank you, Stacey. As Stacey mentioned earlier, we are executing our growth strategy and supporting our base business at the same time. We expect the large projects to drive our long-term growth while our base business continues delivering near-term results. Both large projects and base businesses contributed to our fiscal second quarter results. The Gizan joint venture that started up during Q1 provided a full quarter of benefits, consistent with our commitment of 80 to 85 cents per share on a full year basis. Our pricing actions also contributed, with gains exceeding variable cost increases this quarter. The outperformance was particularly noteworthy in Europe. where you experience the most significant energy cost pressure. I want to express my thanks to the team for their speed of execution and a job well done. Now please turn to slide 15 for our second quarter results. Energy costs remain elevated this quarter, and our team continued to implement significant price actions in response to the unprecedented surge. The 6% total company price increase translates to 13% increases in price for the merchant business. This is our second consecutive quarter of double-digit price gains across our merchant business. Volume was also strong, increasing 8% overall, up in all segments, driven by new assets, hydrogen recovery, strong merchant demand, and increased sales equipment activity. Price and volume combined were up 14%. accounting for most of the 18% sales increase compared to last year. Even at an increase of 9%, our third consecutive quarter exceeded the $1 billion mark as favorable volume, prices, and equity-affiliated income more than offset higher costs. Even a margin declined 270 basis points from the prior year as a negative impact of higher costs and energy pass-through more than offset higher equity affiliates' income. Higher energy pass-throughs lowered EBITDA margins by about 200 basis points. Sequentially, volumes were down 3% primarily due to lower hiring volumes on specific customer operational actions and the Lunar New Year in Asia. Operating income was up 7% driven by favorable price and cost. However, EVODA was up 2% and net income was down 5%, primarily due to the non-insuring items related to the finalization of our previous GSAN ASU joint venture through the benefit-back program. ROCE was 10.6%. We currently have significant cash on our balance sheet, which will support the major projects we have announced. Adjusting for this cash, our ROCE would have been 13.7%. We expect ROCE to improve as we explore the cash and the premium targets downstream. Now please turn to slide 16.
Our second quarter adjusted EPS was $2.38, which is $0.30, or 14% above last year's, the fourth consecutive quarter of double-digit year-over-year earnings growth.
and a testament to the stability, resilience, and growth of our business model. Volume was favorable at $0.18 and price net of variable costs was favorable at $0.14 as our price actions more than offset the unprecedented energy cost increases. For the quarter, our price actions alone before netting against variable costs contributed around $0.50. Our other costs were higher due to the combination of investment for future growth, planned maintenance, and external factors. One example that we have invested in is our helium storage caverns to help provide reliable helium supply to our customers globally. This investment increased our cost now, but we expect to generate significant value from this investment in the future. We also see higher costs as we increase resources prior to bringing projects on stream. For example, we have hired approximately 30 people who will be responsible for operating the Jutai gasifier complex once it comes on stream next year. These purposeful, strategic actions taken to ensure the long-term success of our company are responsible for roughly half the total increased cost this quarter. The remaining half was primarily external factors attributable to inflation and supply chain challenges across the region. We remain focused on driving productivity across our business. The GSAN joint venture contributed its first full quarter of results and continues to deliver as expected. Our share of the results from the project are reflected entirely in equity affiliated income this quarter and will be going forward. I realize this is an updated accounting interpretation and is slightly different than we discussed last quarter, but we believe this approach will be clear for our investors moving forward. There is no difference to the bottom line EPS. The project continues to deliver as we expected. Overall for the quarter, equity affiliate income was 18 cents higher, driven by our share of the joint center's profits. Our second quarter accepted tax rate of 18.6% was 160 basis points lower than last year, including the favorable impact of JZAN. We expect our tax rate to be between 19% and 20% for the remainder of this fiscal year. Non-operating income is $0.03 lower, driven by higher pension expense. Now please turn to slide 17. The stability of our business continues to allow us to generate strong cash flow, despite the challenging geopolitical and energy environment. Over the last 12 months, we generated around $2.8 billion of distributable cash flow, or nearly $12.70 per share. From our EBITDA of over $4 billion, we faced interest, taxes, and maintenance capital expenditures. Note that our maintenance capital is a little higher than usual, spending on our new global headquarters, which is nearly complete. From the distributable cash flow, we paid over 45%, or over $1.3 billion, as dividends to our shareholders, and still have about $1.5 billion available for high return products. This strong cash flow, even in uncertain times, enable us to continue to create shareholder value through increasing dividends and capital deployments. Slide 18 provides an update on our capital deployment. We continue to make great progress in developing, announcing, and executing on our major growth projects. In fact, we see potential opportunities significantly greater than the investment capacity we show here.
As you can see, our capital deployment potential
It's over $34 billion through fiscal 2027. $34 billion includes about $8 billion of cash and additional debt capacity available today. Over $16 billion is expected to be available by 2027 and almost $10 billion already set. We still believe this capacity is conservative given the potential for additional EBITDA growth
which would generate additional cash flow and additional borrowing capacity.
We will continue to focus on managing our debt balance to maintain our current targeted AAC rate. So you can see, we've already set 29% and have already committed 74% of the updated capacity we show here. We've made great progress and still have substantial investment capacity remaining to invest. high-return projects. We continually evaluate our capital sustainability projects and determine the best way to use available cash entrusted to us by our shareholders. We believe that investing in these high-return projects is the best way to create shareholder value in our long run. To begin the review of our business segment results, we'll turn the call back over to Safey. Safey?
Thank you, Melissa. Now please turn to slide number 19 for our Asia results. Sales were up 8% compared to last year, primarily on 6% higher volume as a variety of new traditional industrial gas plants came on stream across this region. Price was again positive, the 1% overall price improvement for the region equals to about a 3% increase for the merchant business. China's dual control policy has eased, but COVID restrictions in part of China have modestly impacted customer demand. They also impacted our plant efficiency, and increased our supply chain costs. Costs were unfavorable, primarily due to inflation and resources needed to support new project startups, as Melissa mentioned. EBITDA was up 2% as better volume and price more than offset higher costs. Compared to last quarter, Volumes declined 2%, primarily due to the Lunar New Year holiday. Price was 2% lower sequentially. As mentioned during our last earning call, China's government has relaxed its power tariff program to allow local power costs to fluctuate. This market-oriented approach has resulted in higher power costs compared to last quarter. However, our overall costs were lowered due to better operating and supply chain efficiencies. Our EBITDA was down 9% sequentially and EBITDA margin decreased 60 basis points as the unfavorable volume and price more than offset lower costs. For the second half, of the fiscal year, we are very concerned about the potential impact of the COVID-related restrictions in China, and we do expect higher planned maintenance activities. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Simon to talk about the European results. Simon?
Thank you, Sebi. Now, please turn to slide 20. Energy costs in Europe began the quarter moderating, but then moved up significantly and were the highest yet in March. Natural gas costs peaked in January more than seven times higher than a year ago, while power costs stayed almost four times higher. As Melissa mentioned, our on-site business has contractual pass-through of the higher costs, so we are not directly impacted by higher natural gas prices. Higher power costs are also passed through in our ASU on-site business. In our merchant business, our team implemented significant price actions, which more than covered the higher power costs this quarter. In fact, we recovered this quarter's higher power costs at about half of the unrecovered costs from Q1. Again, a great job by the team. However, we remain vigilant and are working to drive further improvements. Now please turn to slide 21 for a review of our Europe results. Compared to the prior year, sales were up 32%. Energy cost pass-through, which increases sales but not profits, accounted for more than two-thirds of the sales increase. Price increased 14% for the region, which translates to 22% for the merchant business. Prices were higher across all major product lines and subregions. Volume was up 2% on higher merchant volumes. EBITDA was down 3% as favorable price, net of variable costs, and better equity affiliate income were more than offset by negative currency, unfavorable volume mix, and higher other costs. For the quarter, the supply chain disruptions caused by the significant energy cost increases persisted, negatively impacting both plant operating and distribution efficiencies. We also saw higher costs due to inflation while we continued to prepare for new projects coming on stream. EBITDA margin was 950 basis points lower. Most of the decline, about 700 basis points, was due to the significant energy pass-through increase. The remainder was mostly driven by higher costs and negative volume mix, partly offset by strong merchant pricing and higher equitability income. Compared to the prior quarter, price was up 5% further improved from the already strong performance last quarter, which allowed us to more than offset the higher energy costs. This equates to an 8% increase on the merchant business. Volume was 7% lower due to reduced hydrogen demand on customer-specific operating actions. EBITDA jumped 17% sequentially, and EBITDA margin improved 380 basis points as strong price, higher equity affiliate income, and lower non-energy-related costs more than compensated for the lower volume. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Dr. Sirhan for a brief discussion of our other segments.
Thank you, Simon. Now, please turn to slide 22 for a review of our America's results. Sales increased 12% versus last year. Volume and price together were up 11%. Our team in the Americas also did an excellent job raising prices to cover the higher energy costs this quarter. Prices improved in all key product lines over the last year and were also up sequentially. The 5% price gain for the region compared to last year is equivalent to a 12% increase in our merchant business. Price net to variable cost was also positive for the region. Volume grew 6%, primarily due to hydrogen recovery and better immersion demand. In general, we see hydrogen demand back near pre-COVID levels, although high co-volumes this quarter were impacted by the plant outages. We expect the third quarter to continue at a high level of plant outages, then expect volume to fully recover as we move into 2023. Meanwhile, our merchant volume was weaker in South America due to lower demand for medical oxygen as COVID cases declined. The decreased demand for medical gases also reduced America's equity affiliate income. As we expected, planned maintenance increased costs this quarter. Costs were also unfavorable primarily due to inflation and supply chain-related challenges. including driver shortages that are broadly impacting the industry. Operating income improved as positive price and volume more than covered unfavorable mix and higher costs. EBITDA was flat as it was impacted by lower equity affiliate income. EBITDA margin was 460 basis points lower than the previous year due to higher costs, negative volume mix, and reduced equity affiliate income, which were partially offset by better price. Sequentially, volume this quarter was lower due to planned maintenance outages. Operating income was up, primarily due to strong price, but was partially offset by higher maintenance costs. EBITDA was down, additionally impacted by lower equity affiliate income. Now please turn to slide 23, our Middle East and India segment, which includes our businesses in the Middle East, including the Gizan joint venture and India. Sales and operating income in this segment are modest since our Middle East and India wholly owned operations are smaller in size. However, the segment's EBITDA is significant since it includes the equity affiliate income related to the Gizan joint venture and our India joint venture, NXAB. The $55 million increase in equity affiliate income included our share of the Gizan joint venture net profit for the full quarter that Melissa previously discussed. I'm pleased to report that the team successfully started up a number of gasifier and steam turbine units, and the rest of the phase one startup is continuing as planned. Sequentially, equity affiliate income was lower due to the positive non-recurring items in quarter one related to the finalization of our previous GZAN ASU joint venture. Now, please turn to slide 24, which addresses our corporate segment. This segment includes our sale of equipment businesses as well as our centrally managed functions and corporate costs. Over the past few years, our non-LNG sale of equipment businesses have grown considerably and are now reasonably responsible for most of the sales and profit increases this quarter. Our LNG project activities remained robust and also contributed to these increases. As expected, inquiries for potential LNG projects have increased significantly. But since our customers' major projects take time to develop, it will be some time until this interest translates into new projects. At this point, I would like to return the call back over to Seyfi to provide his closing comments. Seyfi?
Thank you, Dr. Serhan. Although the consequences of the conflict in Ukraine are far from clear, the evolving situation has once again brought the critical issue of energy independence and national security to the forefront, emphasizing the critical nature of the energy transition, where air products has highly valued technologies, skills, and experience that will benefit our customers and countries around the world. Gadgetification allows countries to utilize their own resources in an environmentally friendly way, reducing their import of fuel and chemicals. Meanwhile, renewable energy, including green hydrogen and fuels derived from sustainable organic resources, including renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel, will allow countries to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels. Furthermore, the desire for diversified energy supply will also encourage additional LNG projects in the future, a positive development for air products, as we are the leading technology and equipment provider for these large LNG projects. Air products' strategy and competencies are allowing us to be a leader in the energy transition. Our industry-leading gasification technologies are suitable for various types of feedstocks, which can create net-zero hydrogen. The Neom Green Hydrogen Project is the largest project of its kind in the world. Our LNG heat exchangers, which convert natural gas to liquid, are an integral part to all LNG projects. The sustainable aviation fuel to be produced in our new facility in California is a direct drop-in replacement for conventional jet fuel. It can significantly reduce carbon footprint of the aviation industry without any equipment modification. The focus on energy security and energy transition is creating significant new project opportunities now and in the future. Therefore, we firmly believe that investing in high-return projects rather than share by that is the right way forward. to support the energy transition, ensure continued profitable growth for air products, and an appropriate return for our investors. Now please turn to slide number 25. I remain highly confident of air products' resilient business model, our strategy, and our execution. However, I do have some concerns about the economic backdrop driven by continued COVID challenges, the impact of supply chain constraints, inflation, and energy costs. Even with these challenges, for Q3 fiscal year 2022, our opening per share guidance is $2.55 to $2.65, up 10% to 15% over last year and almost 20 cents higher than last quarter. For fiscal year 2022, our earnings and cashier guidance remains unchanged at 1020 to $10.40, which is 13% to 15% better than last year. We continue to see our CapEx in 22 to be around $4.5 to $5 billion, including the approximately $1.5 billion previously invested for phase one of the JASAN project. At this point, I'd like you to turn to slide number 26. The drive for energy security and transition to a more sustainable future are not mutually exclusive. The board needs cleaner, lower carbon forms of energy and more diverse sources of energy. We believe our strategy directly addresses these needs. As we drive toward a clean energy world, the talent and dedication of our people are the key to making this vision a reality. We need and fortunately have talented and dedicated people to help us accelerate the progress. As I always say, our long-term competitive advantage is the commitment and motivation of our people. Their hard work and contribution will ensure our success. So at this point, I would like to end my comments. and we will be very delighted to answer questions. Operator, we are ready for questions.
Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star 1 on your telephone keypad. Again, that is star 1. Please make sure your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. Our first question will come from Vincent Andrews with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
um thank you uh and good morning safety how are you very good vincent great to hear from you okay thank you um i'm wondering if you could just talk a little bit more to start off with about the the volume decline in in europe and how much of that was related to you know sort of customer financial conditions versus maintenance or or anything else and sort of how you're seeing the european operating environment in general just given obviously the inflation for the consumer and for corporates and some of the other macro challenges?
Sure. Our volume decline in Europe in our HICO business was specifically related to one specific customer who decided to kind of change the feed stock for their gasifiers because of the high natural gas prices. But overall, we do see a small decline. I think we said that our volumes in Europe sequentially are down about 2%. That is obviously the effect of the very high energy prices. And those high energy prices is affecting demand. But it is not dramatic and it is not a significant cause of concern, but it is a reality that they have to deal with.
Okay, thank you. And as a follow-up, the other costs that you called out from the investments, you know, obviously easy to understand what you're doing there, but could you help us understand whether those costs have now sort of plateaued on a sort of year-over-year basis such that we'll begin to lap them and they won't become an incremental issue, or do you think there's going to be more investment coming in future quarters?
Well, obviously, we watch our costs every penny. But the cost increases, for example, in Europe, are related to the fact that we are building the infrastructure that we need to build in order to bring our green ammonia into Europe, crack it, and supply green energy to Europe. So it is... early days, but we have started that process and that requires people and expenditure and buying properties and renting equipment and trying to do engineering and all of that because that is, you know, we need to get ready because by 2026, 2027, we need to bring in the green ammonia and sell it to our customers and the customers expect us to start building the infrastructure. And then around the world, we are starting up new plants and all of that. So those costs are very focused and necessary for us to maintain the growth. We will suffer a little bit, as you see right now, our costs are a little higher than they should be, but in the overall scheme of things, they would be more than justified as we move forward. But I don't expect to see a significant uptick on those costs, if that is where you are going against it.
That's exactly what I wanted to know. Thank you very much, Stacy. I'll pass it along to you.
Yeah. Thank you.
Our next question comes from Kevin McCarthy, a vertical research partner. So your line is open. Please go ahead.
Good morning. This is Cory on for Kevin. In the context of Asia, why has the pricing in Asia lagged? And can you help us understand maybe the pricing in the region? And then for the volume, it declined modestly on a sequential basis. How much of that was related to Lunar New Year versus COVID? And have you seen any impact thus far in the current quarter as it relates to COVID impacts on volume? Fine.
With respect to pricing, the reason that the prices haven't gone up so much in Asia is because there is no significant energy inflation in Asia that justifies us going to the customers and increasing prices. So that is the fundamental dynamic. The decrease in volumes are mainly due to Lunar New Year. But starting in March, the restrictions that the Chinese government has put in Shanghai and so on are beginning to have some effect. And as we are in this current quarter, we do see more impact because of the COVID restrictions. It is almost impossible to predict what would be the effect because it depends on how much they relax the restrictions or actually increase it depending on the progress of COVID. So we are watching that situation very carefully because it can swing back and forth in a significant way.
Understood. Yes, that's great. And as a quick follow-up, in the context of rising interest rates, I'm curious how you think about you know, capital deployment going forward and the need for potentially higher ROIC on future projects? Thank you.
Rising interest rates. If we need to raise new capital, obviously we would have to pay more interest on that. But right now, currently, we have a lot of cash and we are not in the market to do that. Was that your point or did I miss that?
I guess I meant more broadly, sort of structurally, you know, as you think about the 10% returns that you generally target, you know, would you raise that target and how would you think about the project you take on? Yeah, thank you.
No, but now that I understand your question completely, of course we do. I mean, if we are going to bid on a new project or consider a new project, we will consider it with a view of what is the cost of capital. Obviously, the cost of capital has gone up as interest goes up. Sure.
Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
Our next question comes from David Begletter at Deutsche Bank. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hey, good morning. This is Anthony Mercandetti on for David Begletter. Would you expect earnings in Europe to be up year over year in the second half? And then in regards to Asia, Do you think merchant pricing is slowing there? It was up just, I believe, 3% year over year.
Well, I think, first of all, if I may ask your second question first, merchant pricing in the second half in Asia depends very much on what the energy costs are and all that. If you see energy costs going up, that our costs are going up, it certainly will increase the prices to recover that. And I hope that our performance in the last two quarters demonstrates that we do have the ability to increase prices if energy costs go up. As Melissa mentioned, we have increased prices in Europe 22% versus last year. Significant pricing power when it is justified. So we will do that. As far as whether our earnings in the second half of the year for Europe will be higher than Before, I don't want to make forward predictions like that, but from the guidance that we have given you for the quarter and for the year, you can conclude that we are not expecting any decline. We expect that we will do fine. This is last year. That's the only way we can meet our forecast.
Okay, thank you. Yes, and just maybe as one more follow-up here, is the entire increase in the Middle East and India equity income of, I think it was $55 million, is it all from Jazan?
Most of it is from Jazan. Our joint venture operations in India is doing very well too, but most of that is from India. Gizan. Dr. Serhan, do you want to make any comment on that?
Yeah, definitely Gizan is the main driver for the results in the second quarter. But again, when it comes to our joint venture, 50-50 NXAB in India, that's also doing very well. We're currently basically executing around 20 new plants for India. They are basically the number one industrial gas company in India, and they're on a significant growth. So we anticipate in the future that we're going to get more contribution from that. Great. Thank you.
Sure. Our next question comes from Mike Leadhead at Barclays. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Great. Thanks. Good morning. First, I wanted to ask on your slide 11 on the 2023 projects, I appreciate we're still a bit early in 22, but I think you've got over $2 billion of projects starting up there. So could you maybe just help level set roughly how you should think about the EPS contribution in 23? I know Jazan should be immediately creative upon close. Other projects might need to ramp. Just roughly how we should net that all together here.
Well, I think we have laid it out for you because we say that every dollar that we spend should get us – 10 cents in operating income. And then, you know, our tax rate and all of that. So the projects that we have, we have given you the capital. Not all of them are not going to come on the stream at the beginning of 23. But, you know, you can make a good guess about how much contribution those projects will make to our bottom line. And it is not small.
Okay, great. And then maybe just secondly, on the SAF project, I think there's obviously been tremendous customer interest for sustainable aviation fuel, as you rightly talk about. But my understanding is there is still some questions in the industry about constraints on feedstock and what that ultimately means for SAF pricing and the economics behind it. So, obviously, you're investing in backing a company growing very tremendously from, say, 4 million SAF to 250 million SAF. So I guess just how do you get comfortable with the questions of feedstock supply and the economics behind that?
Well, because we have confidence in board energy people who have been, they are responsible for coming up with feedstock. They have been in the business of buying and providing feedstock for their facilities for the past 20 years. That company has been around since 1999 and, They are very competent people and they have done all due diligence and they feel very confident that they can get the feedstock. Everybody in the world is trying to do this thing. As you know, that's why a company like Chevron went and bought REG and all that. Everybody is trying to convert their refineries to sustainable airline fuel because that is the fuel of the future. The great thing about sustainable aviation fuel is the fact that it's a direct dropping. You don't need to change the engine of the plane or anything like that. Obviously, we believe that 50 years from now, most of these planes, especially the short hauled ones, will be fueled by hydrogen. But I think that in the meantime, right now, sustainable airline fuel, SAF is the solution and everybody wants it, not only the airlines, but also companies, some of the biggest companies in the world, that they want to take credit for decarbonizing their business travel. So the demand is very high on that. We are very excited about that project.
Great. Thank you.
Thank you.
We'll go next to Mike Harrison at Seaport Research Partners. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good morning. Good morning, Mike. How are you? Doing well. Thanks, Safie. You noted the increases that you've seen in LNG inquiries, obviously given the natural gas situation in Europe. Can you give us a sense of how many of these inquiries could turn into equipment sales? And I guess maybe how should we think about the contribution of LNG heat exchangers as we think about the next couple of years?
Well, I'm going to turn this question to Dr. Serhan to answer because he runs the business on a day-to-day basis. But obviously, we are not going to disclose the contribution of these projects. But Dr. Serhan mentioned that they are seeing significant additional inquiries. But I'll let him make the comment. Dr. Serhan, would you like to? Yes.
Yeah, thanks, Sefi. Yeah, we're currently executing seven large world-scale projects right now. They're under execution. Everything is going well. And actually, we're getting lots of pressure from our customers to supply these exchanges earlier because of the demand for LNG. And I can tell you our pipeline right now of projects is more than 15 projects that basically we're developing with our customers. And we see this is going to be coming soon. In the future, so we do expect very steady flow and income out of our LNG business. It's really in a very good position.
Okay, Mike. All right. And that's great. And then wanted to ask a question about the helium business. Talk a little bit about what you're seeing in that market and how much contribution that's having to both earnings and pricing. and maybe talk a little bit about what we should expect from the helium business in the second half compared to what you're seeing now. Thank you.
Mike, you know, our helium business is a business that we don't usually talk about the details of that, but in terms of how much contribution and all of that. It's a great business. We are the world leader on that. The fact of the matter is that the world expected that a very large project that will produce helium, called the Amur Project in Russia, would be on the screen in 2021. And that would put a lot of helium in the market, and therefore it would have a negative effect on prices. That was the expectation. In starting up those plants in Russia, they had one explosion in one train, and then six months later, they had an explosion in the second train. So no helium came out of Russia in 2021, and nothing has come out of it in 2022 yet. But now, on top of the fact that they have to repair those units because of the damage that was done, now you have the issue of the sanctions on Russia. So I am not sure that even then they are ready to bring that material to the market. How much of it can they bring on the market considering the sanctions? So as a result of all of that, you would expect that the market for helium would be a little bit tight, and that is what we see.
Okay? Excellent. Thanks very much. Thank you, Mike.
We'll move next to Josh Spector with UBS.
Yeah, hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just first on the guidance, I guess looking at your guide for your next quarter in the full year, you're implying about a 10% ish step up sequentially each of the next two quarters. I wonder if you could break down the drivers there between price cost recovery, uh, volume or anything else, particularly in light of, uh, you know, perhaps more challenging volume outlook than you guys expected previously.
Well, I'm very happy that you are, you laid it out like that because, uh, it does show that it is a pretty robust forecast, so 10% each quarter going up. The reason that we feel confident about that is that, number one, historically, if you look at our results, we deliver about 47%, 48% of our EPS in the first half, and 52, 53% of our result in the second half. Seasonally, the second half is stronger. So that is one reason. The second reason is that we are very confident about the fact that we can deal with inflation and energy cost increases by increasing prices. So as a result, and I hope the investors get some comfort about that, looking at our results, that we have that capability. And I think that is one of the most important things that I hope people notice about our results, that we have the capacity and the ability to do that. And the only reason we can do that is because our products, our products that our customers need, and our products are not a significant part of our customers' costs. So with the increased prices, we are not increasing costs. the final price of the product that the customer sells to the market that much. So we have the ability to recover that. And then with the volumes, we are optimistic that at least, I don't know what's going to happen in Asia, but we are optimistic that at least in the US and in Europe, we will see some pent up demand because now that the COVID is easing out, and therefore we will see better volumes.
Okay, thanks. That's very helpful. And I guess just a second question, just on hydrogen logistics. I guess with the NEON project, you guys announced there's $2 billion of infrastructure to be spent along with that. With SAF, you talked about some infrastructure there. The Arizona plant, I think you had some language that it could be a hydrogen hub to an extent. And you announced the Rotterdam commercial truck hydrogen hub as well. Is that part of that $2 billion being spent in some of those projects, or is that contemplated for some different applications?
The $2 billion is just related to NEO. The other things that you're talking about are additional costs to that $2 billion.
Okay, thank you. Sure.
We'll go next to Lawrence Alexander with Jefferies. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Good morning. This is Dan Rizwan for Lawrence. Thank you for taking my question. Just want to think, over time, what do you think is a good mix in terms of profit contribution from the vertically integrated JVs relative to on-site, merchant, and packaged? How should we think about it over the long term?
May I just focus on your question to make sure that I understood it correctly?
I just want to know how we should think about mix over the long term from JVs, from onsite, from merchant and packets, how it should break out.
Well, our JVs right now, if you add up the sales of our JVs, I think we disclosed that publicly. Simon, we disclosed it publicly, so I can mention that, right?
Correct.
Yeah. Our sales from JVs is getting close to more than $2.5 billion. So we see very good growth in our JVs. Our major JVs are an excellent company that we have in Italy called Satio. We have an outstanding company in India. And as Dr. Serhan mentioned, they are growing very fast with 20 new plants under construction. And then we have a great JV in Thailand and a significant joint venture in Mexico. Those four, and obviously we have a JV in Taiwan that we could fully consolidate. But these JVs, they're all very good companies, long established companies, and they are doing very well because some of those economies are doing well. So we expect those to continue to grow. And then our merchant business, Right now, I think our on-site business is about 52%, 53%, 55% of our portfolio. And we expect that with all of the big projects that we are doing, that we would end up our on-site business, if you look at it 10 years from now, it might grow to be about 70% of our business. But that doesn't mean that our merchant business is shrinking. our merchant business will continue to grow, but the percentage will come down because the whole company will become a much bigger company.
That's very helpful. I really appreciate that. And then just one follow-up. With the equity income, does it have the same seasonality as the rest of the company? I think you mentioned 52%, 48% for EPS. I was just wondering if the income from affiliates is relatively the same.
I wouldn't characterize it that way because those are different countries, different dynamics and all of that. But usually the second half of the year is stronger for most people, usually.
Thank you very much. Thank you.
John McNulty with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi, safety. Thanks for taking my question. Um, so I guess, look, we understand the lockdowns in China are a little bit difficult to predict, um, going forward, but I guess, is there a way to think about how much April was down relative to say, you know, the first score, excuse me, the, the, your, your fiscal two Q levels, just so we can kind of kind of set a baseline and then, and think about how it, how it kind of changes throughout the quarter.
Well, first of all, good morning, John. John, you know, if I start disclosing that since I know the results for the month of April, it's kind of talking about the quarter while we are in the middle of it. But let me just in general say that April was a little bit worse than the month of March. Let me put it that way. The situation compared to March hasn't improved. I hope it does improve, but it's totally unpredictable, John. I don't think even the Chinese authorities know that in terms of, it just depends on the spread and number of cases of COVID.
Got it. Okay. And then just a housekeeping kind of question. So in slide 16, where there was kind of a breakdown of the earnings contributions, You had about 18 cents from equity-affiliated income, and I'm assuming the bulk of that's Jazan. But when I annualize that, it doesn't quite get to that kind of 80 to 85-cent contribution that Jazan is supposed to be giving. So am I missing something on this, or does Jazan have kind of another kind of step up when we think about moving from fiscal 2Q to fiscal 3Q that we should be thinking about, whether there's a startup issue or what have you? I guess, how would you characterize that?
I'll give Melissa to think about this thing before I turn it over to her to answer the specific question. But with respect to Jazan, there is no step up. I mean, what you saw in the second quarter is a pretty good, is a representation of what that will do every quarter until the phase two comes on the stream. So now if you are taking the contribution that we have had and annualizing it and say that there is the 88 cents. I think you should get to that. I think Melissa mentioned that it would get to that. But Melissa, would you like to make any comments on this?
Yeah, so thank you, Safi. Just to be clear, that $0.18 that you're seeing there is versus prior year, right? So you have to take that as a portion of the prior year. But to be clear, if you're analyzing the IGCC, it's around $0.22 for this quarter. But we did have some headwinds in other joint ventures. Specifically, our Mexican joint venture had some headwinds because of reduced sales from COVID lock sales, medical oxygen.
Got it. Okay. No, that makes sense. Thanks for the call. I appreciate it.
Yep, absolutely.
We'll go next to Chris Parkinson with Mizuho. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning. This is Kieran. I'm for Chris. Hi. I was just wondering if you can speak a little bit about your current let's say traditional onsite project backlog. You seem to be getting some benefits in Asia throughout this quarter, but how should we think about contributions from that business and the balance of the year and maybe into 23 and maybe more of a long-term picture? Are you seeing an uptick in opportunities, I guess, particularly in terms of energy or chemical or electronics and markets? Thank you. Sure.
We are doing very well in that regard. We are getting projects which are more than our so-called traditional share of the market. We are very successful in the electronic industry, as you saw on the projects that we have announced, and there are some projects that we haven't announced. And in the other things like oxygen plants and nitrogen generators and so on, we certainly are winning our share of the market. So if you look at the industrial gases business worldwide and look at our market share, which is about, I think, 14, 15, 17 percent, depending on how you look at it, we certainly are winning more than that in terms of the so-called traditional nitrogen generator, oxygen generators, and electronic high-purity nitrogen generators. We are doing fine there, and we are very pleased with that.
Great. And then maybe just a really quick follow-up in terms of the America logistics challenges. I think you mentioned trucking being a bit of a drag in terms of the quarter. Any thoughts in terms of that improving, whether it's just preliminary thoughts into what you've seen throughout April and May, or just your thoughts into the back half of the year would be helpful. Thank you.
Sure. I mean, our challenge in the United States is that you know that we are obviously a very big trucking company because we have all of these trucks delivering product to our customers. I don't mind telling you that we right now have had in the last quarter about 150 positions open for truck drivers that we cannot get. So despite that, we are delivering product to our customers and so on. But you know what that means. That means that our costs are increased. Number one, we have to offer a lot more to our drivers. And number two, people have to work significant amounts of overtime in order to compensate for the shortage of the drivers that they have. So that is creating an issue for us. But that has been with us in the last two quarters. And the effect of that on our bottom line is included in the second quarter. So in the next few quarters, I don't think the situation will get worse, but I think we owe it to you to describe what the challenges are.
Thank you very much. Sure.
We'll go next to Steve Byrne with Bank of America. Your line is open, Steve. Please go ahead.
Hi, this is Rock Hoffman for Steve Byrne. My first question is regarding the SAA Hello. Regarding the first SAF project, does World Energy have any long-term contracts for SAF? And if so, will pricing need to be competitive with conventional aviation fuel? And then will the hydrogen plant be a POX or ATR technology rather than an SMR so as to enable CO2 capture if required in the future?
Okay. Number one, I'll answer your second part of the question. The hydrogen plants that we have supplying this thing now when it comes on the stream will be the regular SMRs. But in the future, we can put CO2 capture on those, but capturing CO2 in Southern California, you have a challenge of what do you do with it. Our plan in the long term is to try to supply that facility with green hydrogen, which is we can bring to Los Angeles from our different plants making green hydrogen and use our pipeline to deliver that. So that is how we would super decarburize. In terms of the price, competitive pricing, as you know, when you sell sustainable airline fuel to an airline, you charge them a certain amount, but then there is the incentives, the low cost incentives LCFS, low carbon fuel subsidies that people get. So theoretically, you can sell me a gallon of sustainable aviation fuel for $5 or $6, which is the price that you pay for the conventional thing. But then one can get about $3 to $4 or sometimes more than that, depending on the carbon intensity, as a subsidy, which is a tradable commodity right now. So as a result, the end result will be as if you are selling it for $9 or $10 a gallon these days. So that is how that bill works. Therefore, it is very competitive. Okay?
Got it. Thank you. Thank you. Quick follow-up. Just what was the source of hydrogen recovery in the Americas, and is there more opportunity for this?
The source of hydrogen recovery is basically the fact that the refineries are running harder because the demand for gasoline has gone up.
Got it. Okay. Thank you. Thank you.
Yeah. And with no other questions holding, I'll turn the conference back for any additional or closing comments.
Well, thank you very much. I would like to take a moment and thank everybody for their participation in our call. We appreciate your good questions, and we look forward to talking to you in about three months about our third quarter results. In the meantime, stay safe and have a wonderful day. Thank you very much.
Ladies and gentlemen that will conclude today's call. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at this time.