This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk01: specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's remarks, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touchtone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Carla Kimray. Please go ahead.
spk04: Good morning and thanks for joining Peabody Energy Call for the first quarter of 2024. With me today are President and CEO Jim Grech, CFO Mark Spurback, and our Chief Marketing Officer Malcolm Roberts. Within the earnings release, you will find our statement on forward-looking information as well as the reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures. We encourage you to consider the risk factors referenced there along with our public filings at the FCC. Now I'll turn the call over to Jim.
spk06: Thanks, Carla, and good morning, everyone. First quarter operational results were highlighted by a number of challenges and successes. There were unforeseen production challenges in Australia that are now behind us, while thermal coal shipments in the U.S. were impacted by unseasonably warm winter weather and low natural gas prices. Within our Seabourn Met segment, Shell Creek continued to exceed production expectations, although shipments have been hampered by the failure of the Demopolis Lock. We continue to strategically invest in our portfolio through the development of Centurion and completed the acquisition of the adjacent Wardswell coal deposit, which extends the mine life to over 25 years. Before I expand on the markets, I want to thank our global employees for their continued focus and commitment to working safely and efficiently. Now turning to the global coal markets. Seaborne thermal coal markets traded within a tighter range for the first quarter. The warmer winter and low natural gas prices have continued to weigh on demand for thermal coal, coupled with a steady supply from the east coast of Australia, resulting in Newcastle coal trading within a range of $120 to $135 per ton. Asian thermal coal imports are expected to remain robust, with China continuing to show increases in electricity demand, with first-quarter seaborne thermal coal imports estimated at a year-over-year increase of approximately 15%. Within the seaborne metallurgical coal market, coking coal prices declined during the quarter. Metallurgical coal demand was hampered by thin steel margins globally, except for India, where robust economic output supported steelmaking profitability. PCI prices also retreated during the quarter, however, not to the extent of higher quality coking coals. During April, we have seen improving steel margins, and seasonal restocking providing pricing support to metallurgical coal markets. In the United States, electricity generation for the first quarter of 2024 proved to be particularly challenging with a warm winter and significantly lower gas prices resulting in coal's share of electricity generation nationally declining to approximately 15% during the first quarter. With that said, coal continues to be a critical component to the country's energy generation and looked at regionally in the U.S. As an example, coal power was relied upon and accounted for over 40% of generation in the MISO and SPP regions in various instances in January 2024, again proving the importance of coal for a reliable grid. Now moving on to our operating segments. The seaborne thermal segment shipped higher volumes than anticipated, with additional Wolf & Young volumes going to the domestic market as a carryover from the train derailment on the main line in December. Average realized prices and costs per ton were lower than anticipated due to higher production at Wilpinyon, where we opportunistically mined some high-ass seams, which we do when the market supports it. The higher production at Wilpinyon was offset by an extended long-wall ramp up at Wombo. Looking forward, we expect a higher proportion of Newcastle spec coal due to increased production from the Wombo complex. The seaborne MET segment shipments were in line with expectations. Volumes were lower than ratable for the year due to an anticipated long well move at Metropolitan and mine sequencing at the CMJV. Segment costs per ton were at the high end of our range, impacted by an unplanned Coppabella dragline outage and acceleration of planned coal prep plant repairs at the CMJV, partially offset by higher production at Shoal Creek. Our sales mix was impacted due to mining some lower quality coats at CMDB due to mine sequencing. As we look forward to the full year, our sales mix should improve with additional sales from Shoal Creek through the anticipated opening of the Demopolis Lock. In the PRB, shipments were lower than expected as a result of an unseasonably warm winter and prompt natural gas prices that averaged $2.10. Segment cost per ton came in higher than expected due to lower volumes but we're somewhat offset by rationalization of discretionary cost spend. Although PRB demand for the quarter was challenged, we are contracted to 85 million tons for the year. Our full year guidance assumes a normal summer and fall with customers meeting their commitments. If our customers have different demands or needs, we will work with them to be responsive while still retaining the full value of our contracts. In other U.S. thermal, shipments were below expectations as we had a few customers reduce their shipments due to high inventories and low natural gas pricing. Segment margins were higher than anticipated due to favorable sales realization, which included some sales contract cancellation settlements. Even with the current market conditions, our exceptional sales team was able to book some new business, so our price volumes for the year did not change. Outside of our active operations, we continue to make progress at the Centurion Mine, our key metallurgical coal growth project. We've had some delays in the delivery dates of some mining equipment from the manufacturer, but expect development coal to occur in the second quarter. As previously announced, we closed an awards well transaction last month. We are currently developing an integrated mine plan, and we'll discuss it more fully in the future. The recruitment of the initial Centurion Mine development workforce is complete, even though labor remains tight in the mining industry in Australia. We continue to expect the first longwall coal in early 2026, and capital expenditures remain in line with previous guidance. We are pleased to announce that for the first time in nearly 12 years, we are mining at our Lee Ranch mine in New Mexico. In 2022, we secured a new long-term contract which extended the life of our New Mexico operation and supported the transition from El Segundo back to Lee Ranch. In summary, we have had some challenges this quarter, but as we look out to the full year, our operations and sales books have us well positioned. We completed two long-wall moves in Australia, coal quality is improving, and our production plans give us confidence in reaffirming our full-year guidance. I'll now turn it over to Mark to cover the financial details. Thanks, Jim.
spk07: In the first quarter, we recorded net income attributable to common stockholders of $40 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, and adjusted EBITDA of $161 million. Included in these results was an estimated $18 million non-cash remeasurement charge from the weaker Australian dollar. The company generated $120 million of operating cash flow, and had $61 million of capital expenditures with more than half of that dedicated to Centurion. During the quarter, we continued to execute on our shareholder return program and repurchased 3.2 million shares, or 3% of shares outstanding. Under the existing $1 billion share repurchase program, we have $570 million of remaining share repurchase authorization. The company ended the quarter with $856 million of cash, fully funded reclamation accounts, and a new $320 million revolving credit facility. Turning now to the first quarter segment results. Seabourn Thermal recorded $94 million of adjusted EBITDA. First quarter shipments were 100,000 tons more than anticipated as higher Wilp and Young production offset lower production at Lambeau. The lower cost Wilp and Young production was offset by lower realized prices, resulting in EBITDA margins of 33%. in line with the previous quarter. The Seabourn Metallurgical segment generated $48 million of adjusted EBITDA. Average realized pricing was less than anticipated due to mining lower-quality coal themes at the CMJV, and PCI coal prices remaining weak relative to premium hard coking coal. Costs of $139 per ton were at the higher end of guidance due to unplanned equipment and wash plant repair costs at the CMJV. The U.S. thermal mines produced 63 million of adjusted EBITDA in a quarter on lower-than-expected shipments that Jim previously mentioned. The PRV mines shipped 18.7 million tons and generated 16 million of adjusted EBITDA. Costs came in at $12.74 per ton, higher than expected due to lower production volumes. The other U.S. thermal segment generated adjusted EBITDA of 47 million. We shipped 3.2 million tons about 400,000 tons less than anticipated, but also benefited from contract cancellation settlements, which increased revenue and EBITDA margins above fourth quarter levels. Costs of $45.25 per ton were in line with guidance as lower maintenance and repair spend offset less volume. Looking ahead to the second quarter, seaborne thermal volumes are expected to increase to 4.1 million tons, including 2.7 million export tons, with higher volumes out of the Lambeau complex. 400,000 export tons are priced on average at $146 per ton, with 1.3 million tons of high ash product and 1 million tons of Newcastle spec product unpriced. Costs are expected to remain consistent with the prior quarter at $45 to $50 per ton. Seabourn metallurgical volumes are expected to be 1.9 million tons, 500,000 tons higher than the first quarter, as the metropolitan long-law move is now complete and mine sequencing improves at the CMJV. Mines are expected to achieve 65 to 70% of the premium hard cocaine coal price based on the projected sales mix and current price relativities. With higher production, costs are anticipated to improve to $110 or $120 per ton in line with full-year guidance. TRB shipments are expected to be 15.5 million tons, lower than rateable, as we enter the traditional second quarter shoulder season. Costs will be temporarily elevated at $12.75 to $13.75 per ton due to lower shipments and resulting higher strict ratio. Other U.S. thermal coal shipments of 3.8 million tons are expected to be higher than the prior quarter as we recently signed new contracts for 1.8 million tons to be delivered this year. We expect costs of $44 to $48 per ton in the quarter. Additionally, in the second quarter, we have the $134 million cash purchase of Wardswell and are expecting tax payments of nearly $120 million in Australia, covering the remaining 2023 liability and the first half of 2024 estimated payments. With an implied stronger second quarter, we are reaffirming full-year guidance. We expect to generate significant cash flow in the second half of the year and remain committed to returning capital to shareholders. Strategically, we continue to take steps to deliver long-term value. We closed the Ward's Well acquisition in April and continued development at Centurion. We expect first continuous minor development coal this quarter and are on track to commence long-wall operations in the first quarter of 2026, on time and on budget. Operator, I'd now like to turn the call over for questions.
spk01: Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then 1 on your touchtone phone. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star, then 2. At this time, we'll pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question comes from Lucas Pipes from B. Reilly Securities. Please go ahead.
spk02: Thank you very much, operator. Good morning, everyone. Mark, I... Mark, I want to start with a few questions on the finance side. You noted the U.S. reclamation bond release of $105 million, and I wondered if you could maybe walk us through the cash flow implications of that release, if any. And then more broadly, there has been some lumpiness around cash flows in Q1. I'd anticipate something similar in Q2 with the Wartswell acquisition closing. Could you speak to any other kind of cash flow impact in Q2, be it working capital or otherwise? And then just with that lumpiness, how do you think about staying in the market from a buyback perspective, do you have the flexibility to be opportunistic, or do you kind of pause it here and then resume it in the second half when you know that cash flow would be stronger again? Thank you very much.
spk07: Yeah, Lucas, thank you for those questions. I'll try to hit on all of them. A really good result with some bond reductions in the first quarter. Credit to our team here for One, getting the reclamation work done, but two, also following up and getting those bonds released. On average, you know, those bonds are probably collateralized at about 55%. So there was some cash returned. We also moved around some other bonds in Australia. So there was a cash inflow. So you see a reduction in that restricted cash and cash collateral on the balance sheet. Offsetting that from a cash flow perspective, though, was some use of working capital. So net-net that $120 million of operating cash flow is how you should look at that. You mentioned a little lumpy here with Q1 with the performance we turned in. As expected, Q2 will be similar. We have the $134 million cash purchase awards well, and I noted in remarks the tax payments in Australia of about $120 million. that makes up both the remaining liability from 2023 as well as the first half of 2024 estimated payments. So a couple of significant cash usages here in the second quarter. But again, going out, look at the second half. Wealth position, you know, based on guidance in the forward price strip, you can see some pretty significant cash flow depending on your price deck. But $300 million to $400 million is an opportunity we have out in front of us. from a cash flow perspective. Maybe lastly, just touching on the program, you know, I'll note a couple of things. One, you know, everything we do, including our show return program, is designed for long-term value and durability. Since we restarted the program, we've announced a return of just under a half a billion dollars, $50 million in dividends and about $430 million in share buybacks. Through the repurchase program, we have essentially created 15% growth in earnings and free cash flow on a per share basis with that share reduction. We have completed the balance sheet initiatives we set out two or three years ago to do, which included one very important step that no one else has done, and that is pre-funding 100% of our global reclamation liability. This puts us in a leading position in the industry going forward. taking that big liability off the table and eliminating a big liquidity and capital risk going forward. So we believe that puts us in a great position to continue developing our premier hard coking coal project in Centurion. And with our quarterly fixed cash dividend, the program's durability remains through periods of lower cash flow, but also very flexible to increase in periods of above average free cash flow pond direction of our board. So lastly, I'd note, and I think you asked, are we going to be opportunistic or flexible? Yeah, I think our program is meant to be flexible. And as we look out in the full year, we see some strong cash flows going forward. And we have the flexibility in our program to look on things on an annual basis and get back in the market on an opportunistic basis when our board deems it appropriate. A lot of flexibility, a lot of opportunity in front of us going forward, and we remain committed to returning additional capital to shareholders.
spk02: Mark, really appreciate that. I think you hit on all the points there. So thank you for that. Jimmy, I want to get your perspective on a couple regulatory things. First, EPA last week unveiled a new PowerPoint plan rule, could you maybe comment on what you think the impact is to your domestic business and how you think from a strategic perspective you can mitigate any impact? And then over in Australia, there's I think a new labor rule coming in regards to contractor pay. If you could maybe comment on that and what the impact might be in Australia, would appreciate your thoughts on those two developments. Thank you.
spk06: Okay, yeah, Lucas. So on the first one, with the EPA and the new suite of rules and the Clean Power Plan rules, I do have some comments on that, but I do want to start out and just recognize the fact that approximately three-quarters of the EBITDA generated from our company comes from our seaborne thermal emit segment. So that doesn't mean we're not concerned about these regulations. Again, the majority of the EBITDA comes from our seaborne platforms. And, you know, one of the things you said, what's it going to mean for our domestic business? Well, you know, a lot of these things go into effect if they do go into effect in the later years. So I don't see any near-term impacts. And the question is still out, is there going to be any longer-term impacts? So, you know, we've stated many times that as a company, we believe in a diverse energy mix, and that includes coal and renewables to have, you know, grid reliability and energy security and affordability. With this suite of regulations, we do believe, though, that the EPA has overstepped its authority, granted to it by Congress, and it's threatening grid reliability at a time of increased energy demand. So, you know, what's different, I think, this time around from, you know, when this has happened in past years is several things, Lucas, that have to be taken into account when you're trying to assess what potential impact that we're going to see from these regulations. One is what's going on now, which hasn't been happening for many, many years, is surging power demand forecasts for the next five years. We've had relatively flat load growth for quite a period in our country, and now with the manufacturing centers, electric vehicles, data centers, AI centers, and so on, there's tremendous, tremendous load growth projected. So, again, you get what's the impact on the U.S. coal markets. Well, as a result of that load growth, projected load growth, in past quarters over 20 power plants have announced delays in retirement dates. So actually you look at that and the U.S. thermal market from that perspective is actually growing. The second thing that's out there that I think is very, very different from when the EPA has done this in the past with these proposed regulations is the national reply of a concern of grid reliability and not having enough existing, even existing baseload generation to support this load growth. What does that mean is there is a groundswell of opposition or stated concern with these proposed EPA regulations. You've got FERC, NERC, PJM, MISO, electric utilities, which we haven't heard from in the past. Politicians from both sides of the aisle are talking about their concerns with these proposed regulations. You've got the leading national newspapers, the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, New York Times overnight, there's a very good article in Fox News, an opinion piece stating their concerns over this grid reliability. So it's very, very different in the past, this groundswell of opposition and concern over these regulations. And what I think is going to happen is you're going to see a very swift and significant pushback in the U.S. court system. Over 20 state attorney generals have already announced their intentions to fight the proposed regulations. We're working with the National Mining Association, America's Power, to mount the U.S. mining industry support legal challenges, and we expect to see court stays on this at some time this year. So the crux of your question is what do we think is going to happen? Nothing in the near term, and I think there's enough opposition in the long term to really put in doubt the impact that these will have on U.S. generation mix, particularly given the fact that power plant lives are being extended because of the load growth. The second question you had was about the new labor rules and Australia contractors saying jobs, same pay. We've included all that in our guidance already. That's really been effective until November 1st. Any impact we see is going to be in there. We don't have as many contractors on our payroll as other mining companies in Australia. There is some impact. It's not significant, and it's already in our forecast going forward after November 1st.
spk02: Jim, thank you very much for that detailed answer on the EPA side. Very, very helpful. On the second part, roughly what percentage of the Australian workforce consists of contractors or labor costs? I guess there'd be a few ways to slice it, but... I guess if it starts November, then we have two out of 12 months impact. So just trying to get a sense for what it could mean for next year on a four-year basis.
spk06: Yeah, Lucas, I don't have that right in front of me, but we'll get it right back to you. We'll follow up with you on that one to get you the correct number on that.
spk02: Sounds good. I really appreciate the call. I'll turn it over for now. And in the meantime, best of luck.
spk01: Thank you, Lucas. The next question comes from Nathan Martin from Benchmark Company. Please go ahead.
spk03: Thanks, operator. Good morning, everyone. Let's start off with Centurion. You guys still targeting development coal there sometime here in the second quarter, it looks like. What's your plan and timing, I guess, as far as selling or marketing those tons is concerned?
spk05: I'll let Malcolm Roberts come in on that, Malcolm. Yeah, good morning, Nathan. Look, we've already started concluding contracts for the development coal coming out of Centurion. So during the quarter, a blue-chip North Asian customer has agreed a two-year contract, and we look forward to making our first shipment later this year.
spk03: Malcolm, are there any limitations there from a transportation standpoint at this point?
spk05: Absolutely no transport issues. We've fully set up within the Ganiella system with contracts and the like to be able to ship that product.
spk03: Okay, perfect. Great. Appreciate that. And then maybe stick with transportation for a second. I think, Jim, you made some comments about the Demopolis lock outage. Just to be clear, What kind of impact are you still seeing there at Shoal Creek? Clearly, your second quarter met. Sales guidance is up quarter-for-quarter, but just a little more color there would be great.
spk06: Yeah, I'll comment on the lock, and then I'll turn it over to Malcolm to talk about the sales. And the lock we've been saying we expect it to be back, Nathan, in service by the end of May, and the Corps of Engineers came out this morning and actually said I think it's going to be May 22nd. It'll be back in service, so... more than a week earlier than planned. So that's some good news that we have for us. Now, in regards to your question about the impact on sales, I'll let Malcolm comment on that.
spk05: Yeah, sure. Thanks, Jim. We've been railing some product to the port at McDuffie. However, what this really means is that for the second half of the year, we're going to be waiting probably two-thirds of our annual volume from Shoal Creek for the second half of the year and one-third for the first half. as a result, but we really do look forward to that lot coming back, and we're advised today, 22nd of May.
spk03: Okay. Guys, appreciate that info as well. Maybe shifting over, and I know I asked about this last quarter, and I think, Jim, you clearly made some comments in your prepared remarks too, but the PRV shipments below your first quarter target, second quarter guidance down 3 million tons, plus or minus. Again, we know seasonally that's typical during the shoulder season. But would be great, you know, kind of get your thoughts on what gives you confidence to maintain your full year guidance range at this point. I mean, it looks to me like you will need to increase second half shipments by at least 12 million tons just to kind of hit the low end of that range. So it would be great to just get a little bit more thought around that piece.
spk06: Thank you. First off, you know, the tonnage levels that we're looking at for the second and then particularly the third and fourth quarter are well within tonnage ranges that we've shipped in the past. So as far as the quantity of coal and our ability to produce it, and I do believe the railroads are going to be able to move it as well, which is a key item in the third and fourth quarter. So logistically, operationally, we feel very good about that. Our sales book is strong, and the indications we have from our customers is that right now we are expecting to have some normal pull in that third and fourth quarter. on those tons. We've already seen an uptick in some nominations for May. It was a little stronger than we thought it was going to be, and we're getting some early indications we could see that again in June. So it looks like there is recovery starting to occur in the PRB, and the indications we're getting from our customers at this time, operationally, logistically, we feel, again, we feel that that's why we're reaffirming that guidance for the full year.
spk03: Great. Thanks, Jim. And then maybe just one more, Mark, to you. I don't want to leave you out. I know Lucas touched on this earlier, some of the moving pieces on the cash side here in the second quarter that are expected. Your available free cash flow, I think, was actually negative at the end of the first quarter. How could this impact your ability to repurchase shares again here in the second quarter?
spk07: Yeah, no, you're right. The table shows the minus four there off of Q1, and with the cash purchase awards well and the cash tax payments, you know, not expecting a robust number for Q2. But, again, our program is designed to be flexible. It is on an annual basis. We're very happy with our liquidity position, and we see some strong cash flows coming forward here in the second half of the year.
spk03: All right, Steve. Very helpful. Appreciate the time, and best of luck. Thanks, Nate.
spk01: The next question comes from Katja Jancic from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.
spk00: Hi. Thank you for taking my questions. Maybe just staying a bit on the share buybacks, is there any possibility that you could use some of the cash on the balance sheet since it's so strong for buybacks?
spk07: Yeah, Katja, it's Mark. As I mentioned, the program is based on an annual look, and we have flexibility. As I mentioned with Nate, we feel comfortable with our liquidity and strong cash flows coming in in the second half of the year. So we are designed to be flexible, and we haven't announced anything, but we have that built in to do what we've been appropriate and to be opportunistic as the market presents.
spk00: Okay, and maybe then on the Centurion, I think for this year, for second half, you expect to ship 150,000 tons, or that was prior expectation. Does that still hold? And then maybe looking to next year, what could potential contribution from Centurion be?
spk07: Gotcha, yeah. So this year, we look to ship about 100,000 tons for the current year. I think production next year on a development basis is probably in the 400,000 ton range. And as Malcolm mentioned, we already have, you know, blue chip Asian customers kind of knocking down our doors trying to contract some of that coal. So really set up strong.
spk00: Okay, thank you.
spk01: Again, if you have a question, please press star, then 1. Our next question is a follow-up from Lucas Pipes from B. Reilly Securities. Please go ahead.
spk02: Thank you very much for taking my follow-up question. I'll start with a quick one. The Hiash product, could you remind us what pricing has been quartered to date for that API 5, and then where does Wilping Young typically price as a percentage against that index? Thank you.
spk05: Yeah, sure. It's Malcolm here. Look, we got to... a 5% to 20% discount against the API 5 index, which is the China index, which is a 5,500 kcal, 22% ash product. We supply high ash products slightly higher than that, so that represents the discount that we're going to.
spk02: All right, that's helpful. And on Shore Creek and Q1, the MSHA data was, uh very helpful uh was was very very strong um and so i wondered if you could maybe comment on on kind of the operational outlook uh from from here uh i i assume there's maybe a little bit of a normalization but would be helpful to hear you think about operations at chill creek for the remainder of the year thank you so lucas i think the msa data had about 600 000 tons in q1 which again is a very very strong quarter for the mine uh very
spk06: very happy with what the team has done down there and, you know, showed that new fit-for-purpose long wall that we had down there is really making a difference. But, you know, we do have long wall moves later in the year. We have minors vacation and so on to contend with later, and we didn't have all of those things occurring in the first quarter. So, you know, to keep that pace up would be very challenging later in the year with all of the things that we have. I just don't see it... staying at that pace in the following quarter with the long, long moves and the Myers vacation that we have ahead of us.
spk02: I appreciate the call. Thank you very much, and again, best of luck.
spk06: Thank you. Thank you, Lucas.
spk01: There are no more questions in the queue. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Jim Grech for any closing remarks.
spk06: Thank you all for joining us today. I'd especially like to thank our employees for remaining focused on safety and for continuing to execute on our various initiatives. I'd also like to thank our investors, customers, and vendors for your continued support. Operator, that concludes our call. Thank you.
spk01: The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer