Chimera Investment Corporation

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Chimera Investment Corporation second quarter 2020 earnings conference call and webcast. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question at that time, simply press star and the number one on your telephone keypad. If your question has been answered or you wish to remove yourself from the queue, press the pound key. We ask that while posing your question, you pick up your headset to allow for optimal sound quality. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Emily Moore of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Nicole, and thank you, everyone, for participating in Chimera's second quarter earnings conference call. Before we begin, I'd like to review the Safe Harbor Statements. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements which are predictions, projections, or other statements about future events. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which are outlined in the risk factor section in our most recent annual and quarterly SEC filings. Actual events and results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read the forward-looking statement disclaimer in our earnings release in addition to our quarterly and annual filings. During the call today, we may also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our SEC filings and earnings supplement for reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measures. The content of this conference call may contain time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this earnings call. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise this information. I will now turn the conference over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Matthew Lambiazzi.

Good morning and welcome to the second quarter earnings call for Chimera Investment Corp. Joining me on the call today are Mohit Marya, our Chief Investment Officer, Rob Colligan, our Chief Financial Officer, Chaudhry Yarladiga, our Chief Operating Officer, and Vic Falvo, the head of our capital markets. I'll make some brief comments, then Mohit will discuss the changes in the portfolio, and Rob will then review our financial results. Afterward, we'll open up the call for questions. I believe the first six months of 2020 will go down in the financial history books as one of the most volatile periods in modern times. The U.S. economy went from excellent to dismal in the span of just a few months, and the financial markets, especially fixed income, experienced record volatility and record intervention from the government. In our space, many levered investors were caught off guard by the swiftly falling asset prices, and they were forced to sell at the low point of the market. Fortunately, Chimera was able to navigate through this difficult period by executing transactions, which enabled us to retain our high-yielding and unique mortgage credit portfolio. It's important to understand that it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to recreate our portfolio in the current low interest rate environment, and its retention affords Chimera the ability to pay a meaningful dividend, which we would not have if the assets had been sold. In the quarter, we took several actions that helped us augment our liquidity. We issued a $374 million three-year convertible bond. We entered into a $400 million three-year revolving loan facility arranged by Aries Capital, and we executed three new mortgage securitizations totaling over $1 billion, which significantly reduced our loan warehouse exposure and helped reopen the mortgage securitization market, which is a primary source for Chimera's long-term finances. Additionally, during the period, we negotiated longer-term and non-mark-to-market repo finance facilities for our mortgage loans and credit-related assets. We now have approximately 75% of our credit borrowings on longer-term facilities, and over 50% of them have no mark-to-market or limited mark-to-market arrangements. While these actions have had the short-term effect of increasing financing costs, we believe the benefits over the long-term are significant We've strengthened our balance sheet, enabling us to further withstand additional market volatility, continue to produce attractive spread income, and to make new investments when we see attractive asset opportunities. This position is enviable given the uncertain economic conditions and the low... continue to buy large quantities of assets to support the financial markets and the U.S. economy. We are presently witnessing the effects of these actions. The 10-year Treasury yield is now roughly 55 basis points, and a rate on a new 30-year mortgage tipped below 3% for the first time in history. Current market expectations are that we'll be in this low-rate environment for several years to come, and that the returns on all financial assets will be also low into the future. While the Federal Reserve's asset purchases have not been directly focused on residential mortgage credit, their purchases have started solidifying the markets and senior mortgage bonds have witnessed significant price appreciation. We would expect that over time, deeper credit subordinate residential bonds could see similar moves. Chimera's portfolio of higher yielding legacy assets should become ever more valuable as the Fed continues to buy assets and returns in the market become ever more scarce. Residential mortgage credit, due to the size of the market and the slow recovery of pricing, offers some of the best opportunities in the fixed income market. The economics for loan securitization continues to be attractive as the credit curve remains steep. Senior front-end bonds are well-bid, creating an opportunity to securitize loans and retain higher-yielding back-end subordinate investments. These subordinate bonds have high relative yield and the potential for meaningful appreciation should markets normalize. We've executed three securitizations in the period and retained the subordinate tranches from those deals. Looking forward, we believe that there will be ample supply of loans for sale from the GSEs and banks, and this supply will create opportunities for us to make new investments for our portfolio. Given the current low yield and low return environment, we think being able to create investments through securitization will allow us to continue to produce attractive results in this challenging market. While this has been a very difficult period to navigate through, we believe Chimera is well positioned for the future. We have materially reduced our exposure to mark-to-market risk on our repo financings, which should help us manage through bouts of volatility in the future. We have been able to retain our legacy portfolio of assets, which will allow us to continue to produce meaningful dividends for our investors in what may be an extended period of low interest rates. The retained portfolio also has the potential for book value appreciation if pricing returns to historical levels. And finally, we believe there are attractive opportunities currently available in the residential loan market, and we have a team and a history of being able to use securitization to successfully create high-yielding investments for our portfolios. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Mohit.

Thank you, Matt. As a result of unprecedented monetary and fiscal support provided by the government, the second quarter saw material improvement in both the equity and fixed income markets. Parts of the equity markets are flat to up year-to-date, while treasury rates were stable in Q2. With rates stable and the Fed rhetoric for a lower rate for the foreseeable future, volatility has subsided. The crowding out effect created by the Fed's market intervention has been positive for all highly rated fixed income securities. The Federal Reserve was mostly focused on agency securities and did not purchase residential mortgage credit. With a shortage of legacy credit assets available after a slow start in April, new issue securitization volumes were brisk in the second quarter. Senior tranches of securitized residential product improved steadily. with its strongest performance in the latter half of the second quarter. During the quarter, we focused on the liability side of our balance sheet and entered into three non-mark-to-market facilities to finance $2 billion of our non-agency portfolio. In addition, we have limited mark-to-market on $611 million of non-agency securities. As a result of these transactions, approximately 54% of our non-agency borrowings are not subject to full mark-to-market risk. As of quarter end, the weighted average term to maturity has increased to 698 days from 223 days in the first quarter. To reduce the risk on our warehouse lines, we completed three securitizations totaling approximately $1.1 billion in seasoned re-performing mortgage loans. Moving loans from warehouse to securitization is an important aspect of our portfolio strategy as it reduces the mark-to-market risk and improves risk metrics for the company. After the completion of this quarter's securitization, our residential mortgage loan warehouse stands at $263 million and is financed for one year without mark-to-market risk. CIM 2020-R3, issued in May, had $438 million underlying loans with a weighted average coupon of 5.28% and a weighted average loan age of 150 months. The average loan size in the R3 securitization was 127,000 and the average FICO was 651 with an average LTV of 80%. We sold 329 million senior securities with a 4.2% cost of debt. Chimera retained a May 2022 calendar call option for the R3 securitization. CIM 2020-R4 had 276 million underlying loans with a weighted average coupon of 4.78% with a weighted average loan age of 168 months. The average loan size in the R4 was 127,000. The average FICO was 598 with an average LTV of 75%. We sold 207 million senior securities with a 3.2% cost of debt. Chimera retained the June 2022 calendar call option on the R4 securitization. In early July, Chimera completed a second rate of securitization of the year. We issued CIM 2020-R5 with 338 million underlying loans with an average coupon of 4.98%. The R5 securitization had a weighted average loan age of 149 months and an average loan size of 152,000. The loans had a weighted average FICO of 678 with an average LTV of 70%. We sold 257 million of investment-grade securities with a 2.05% cost of debt, more than 200 basis points tighter than our early May deal. And in late July, we issued 362 million CIM 2020-J1, our first jumbo securitization of the year. Overall, we are pleased with the current investment portfolio and its long-term prospects. We were able to navigate through this difficult period by executing transactions which enabled us to retain our high-yielding and unique mortgage credit portfolio. Strong credit performance, strength of institutional buying, and the tightening of new issue credit spreads were all positive components for Chimera's long-term securitization strategy. We have 13 existing SIM securitization totaling $7.5 billion available for call and refinancing over the next 12 months. This provides an additional avenue for portfolio performance and complements potential new investment opportunities. We are continually monitoring our outstanding securitization for the best timing, and the opportunity to execute our call optimization strategy and maximize long-term portfolio performance for our shareholders. Our agency CMBS continue to provide attractive spread income and liquidity for the portfolio while providing superior call protection relative to residential agency pass-throughs in this low-rate environment. Lastly, the reduction in mark-to-market achieved this quarter leaves us with plenty of dry powder to make new credit investments. I will now turn the call over to Rob to review the financial results for the quarter.

Thanks, Mohit. I'll review Chimera's financial highlights for the second quarter. Gap book value at the end of the second quarter was $10.63 per share. Our gap net loss for the second quarter was $73 million or $0.37 per share. On a core basis, Net income for the second quarter was 76 million, or 32 cents per share. Our economic net interest income for the second quarter was 121 million. For the second quarter, our yield on interest earning assets was 5.7%. Our average cost of funds was 3.3%, and our net interest spread was 2.4%. Total leverage for the second quarter was 4.3 to 1, while recourse leverage ended the quarter at 1.8 to 1. Expenses for the second quarter, excluding servicing fees and transaction expenses, were $17 million, down from last quarter primarily related to lower compensation expenses. We currently have approximately $850 million in cash and unencumbered assets. This is after we've paid both our preferred and common dividends in full. We continue to monitor liquidity closely and look for attractive financing options to support our portfolio. That concludes our remarks, and we'll now open the call for questions.

At this time, if you would like to ask an audio question, you may do so by pressing star and the number 1 on your telephone keypad. Again, that is star 1. We'll pause for just a moment. The first question will come from the line of Doug Harder with Credit Suisse.

Thanks. Just on that last point of the $850 million of cash, you know, kind of how are you viewing the right amount of cash to be holding given kind of the uncertainties, but coupled with kind of the improved financing you have and, you know, how should we think about, you know, kind of ability to deploy some of that capital?

Hey, Doug, thanks for the question. So if you listen to the comments from last quarter, we were at $650 million, so we're up about $200 million of cash and liquidity or unencumbered assets. Obviously, as you heard in the comments, we focused a lot on securitization and locking up long-term financing this quarter. So our liability side of the balance sheet is dramatically different than last quarter. Obviously, that puts us in a position to be an active bidder, I'm sure, Mo or Matt can talk about forward-looking and pipeline.

Hey, Doug. This is Mahit. Just to add on to Rob's comments, yes, Q2 was focused on shoring up the liability side of the balance sheet, which we've done. We think the cash and unencumbered assets we have in hand now give us some dry pattern to deploy capital and attractive opportunities. Q2, early on, was sort of the liquidations, forced liquidations that occurred gave some low-hanging fruit for some investors. There wasn't really much loan activity within the quarter on the season re-performing side. There was more that was focused on the non-QM side, but we think there's going to be ample opportunities to acquire assets and deploy the capital and liquidity we have on the balance sheet. Great.

And then, Rob, if you could just talk about kind of what the incremental cost might be on kind of the improved structures on the financing that you guys put in place in the second quarter?

Yeah, so as far as improved financing, it's an interesting question, I think. You know, obviously... pre-COVID, repo costs were dramatically lower, haircuts were lower. So I guess the way I look at it is our expenses have gone up, probably in line with most other people in our space. I think repo availability, especially in the non-agency space, is better than it was a few months ago, but still not super active or liquid. But looking out longer term, as hopefully COVID cases go down and remedies are in place, people will go back to work, things will normalize, and the opportunity is there for us, you know, over time to then reduce our liability costs and improve our earnings. But in the short term, obviously, like a lot of people in our space, our cost of financing has gone up a little bit.

All right, and Doug, I'll add a little bit more to what Rob just mentioned. Obviously, on the repo recourse financing side, costs have gone up across the board. That's a knee-jerk reaction to the liquidity that needed to be provided during a crisis. But on the non-recourse side, we did three securitizations over the quarter, the first one in May. And as we said in the opening statement, the cost of debt that we issued that financing at was 4.2%. And by the time we closed the deal at the end of July, that cost of financing was 2.05%. So the securitization market is coming back. There's a lot of demand on the senior parts of the capital structure, and that financing cost has come in materially from where we started the quarter to where we ended, and we think there is room to run even tighter there given the lack of legacy assets available. Great. Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Stephen Laws with Raymond James.

Hi, good morning. You know, kind of a follow-up to Doug's questions and your prepared remarks, but, you know, when I think about leverage, recourse, I think, 1.8, and in total a little higher, and you talked about new investments, you know, can you talk about where you see the leverage numbers moving as we think about portfolio growth maybe over the next 18 months and, You know, you talked about the liabilities. You know, are these things that will be funded with recourse debt initially and move to non-market-to-market through future securitizations, or do you have enough capacity on non-market-to-market facilities currently to fund these new investments?

Hey, Stephen, this is Mohit again. I'll start. Rob and Matt can also opine on it. The non-market-to-market facilities are fully funded at the moment, so there's no capacity there to add more unless we were to start a new facility. But as far as overall leverage and what we're going to do going forward, we came into the year at 3.2 turns of recourse leverage. We've taken that down to 1.8 turns of recourse leverage. Do we think we're going to go back to pre-COVID levels? Not in the near term. I think we're going to be cautious in deploying the capital. and making sure that we don't necessarily use recourse leverage unless it's attractive and the tenor makes sense for us. I think, as Matt mentioned in the opening statements, where we could create bonds that we would retain off the investments we would make will produce high single-digit returns on a cash basis with upside to performance. I think people are still focused on forbearances and deferments and what the government is gonna do as far as stimulus packages going forward. And I think there is upside to credit performance here, and what had happened in Q1 and the early part of Q2 was strictly a liquidity thing. If you look at the data supporting credit performance, it's actually been pretty solid, and our portfolio hasn't really experienced much of a difference from what was happening in Jan, Feb, and March of this year.

Yeah, and just to follow up on that, You know, I think as we get farther and farther away from the event that we had back in the end of March, early April, I think the financing markets at some point in the future will come back online. And you could see the overall leverage of the company go up. But, you know, we'd have to feel like we're well out of the woods before we would do that. And I think in the future that is some upside that we have on our balance sheet.

Great. And, Mohit, as a follow-up – you talked about the potential upside and, and that was really my second question. When I think about, you know, the prepared remarks you talked about being able to, uh, you know, not sell the assets, hold the assets. You clearly helped earnings given the cash flows generated, but you know, we've got a lot of unrealized marks of assets you still own from, own from the first half of the year. You know, how do you think about that? It's a pretty significant number, I believe. So, you know, how much of those unrealized marks do you think are potentially recoverable? Um, I don't know how you handicap that around the poor visibility looking forward, but to your point with some liquidity-driven marks and other things, it seems like some of the assets are likely undervalued versus what their value is six or 12 months from now. So how do you think about potential recovery in magnitude and timing of the unrealized marks from the first half?

Sure. That's actually a good thing to focus on because if you look at the As I just mentioned, what happened in March was strictly a liquidity-driven event, not necessarily a credit-driven event, and people were going to wait to see what happened to the asset performance in April, May, and June. And there were some stress runs done that the pandemic was going to create large unemployment, which played out, but with the stimulus checks and the way our portfolio was situated, it didn't really materially affect the cash flows of our portfolio that dramatically. So we think the portfolio is undervalued. And if you look at the performance of the portfolio, both from a delinquency and loss standpoint of Q4 to where we ended Q2, delinquency numbers are pretty flat. I think, as we've said repeatedly, the portfolio in a 60-plus-date delinquency number is right between mid-eighths to mid-nine percent. So if we remove the pandemic, we think we could get back and put the prices back to the levels of Q4. That's roughly over $550 million of unrealized P&L that we would get back. That would affect book value by about $2.5. That is what we think the value of the assets is. If you look at what happened from Q4 to Q2 in terms of rate movement, there's 140 basis point move in rates from two years to ten years, and that rate rally should also have an impact on pricing. The average duration of our non-agency portfolio is probably around five years. That would imply a price change of seven points. Now we're not gonna get basis point for basis point move in price appreciation. So if you haircut that seven point move and take only 25% of that, that's an additional dollar and a half of book value appreciation. So we feel if markets normalized and returned performance, and performance was actually taken into account, but our book value should be anywhere between $13 to $14 versus the 1063 we're at now.

That's great, Colin. Thank you for the details on that. I appreciate you taking my questions.

Take care. Yeah, Stephen, let me just add one other thing there. Obviously, there's room for improvement, but we have the secured debt, the liabilities on our balance sheet that we also mark the market. And those have recovered much faster, the more senior securities. Those have recovered much faster. Most recoveries are unbalanced or uneven, and so that's a short-term decline for us because that's a liability on our books, and those have come back in value much faster than the loans or securities you have on our books. So again, over time, it should all draw up to where Mohit was pointing at, but just wanted to point that out from the liability side and some short-term effects to book value.

Great, thanks for that caller.

The next question will come from the line of Eric Hagan with KBW.

Hey, good morning, guys. For the $5.9 billion in total repo, what percentage of that balance is being used to fund non-agency assets, and what type of collateral is on that repo line? Hey, Eric, this is Monty.

Good morning, Monty. We have $3.6 billion of repo borrowings on the non-agency side. $3 billion of that is in securities, and $600 million of that is in warehouse loans that we have. Of that $3 billion, $1.3 billion of that borrowing is on a non-market-to-market basis on the security side. So those are our legacy assets, the re-REMICs we created back in 2008, 2009, some of the middle MES positions that we've created off of our securitizations in addition to our risk retention pieces. So it runs the gamut of what we own in terms of what's being financed.

Got it. And the $600 million in loans, what's the kind of collateral profile look like there?

So that $600 million of loans is the season-reperforming loans that we've been acquiring. So that number, as I mentioned in the opening remarks, has come down based on the securitization we completed in July 10th. So that number is a 630 number and has come down to now, I think, just over $300 million of UPB and I think $283 million of borrowing, which is on a one-year non-market market facility that was put into place in July. Got it.

Very helpful. Thanks. And then for the assets that you securitized last quarter, the three deals that you ran through, what was the loss-adjusted yield on the tranches that you retained from those deals?

So in our base case runs, the loss adjusted yields anywhere between 8% to 9%. 8% to 9%. Got it.

Yep. Thank you guys so much.

Thank you. As a reminder, in order to ask an audio question, simply press star and the number 1 on your telephone keypad. Our next question will come from the line of Trevor Cranston with J&P Securities.

Hey, thanks. One more question on the financing side. Of the 46% of the non-agency financing that is still mark-to-market, can you kind of elaborate on how you're thinking about that place if you're sort of planning to incrementally continue to move that more to non-mark-to-market facilities or how we should think about that going forward? Thanks.

Hey, Trevor, so a vast majority of that 46% are middle-mes securities off of securitizations we've done. And given, as I laid out in the opening remarks, we have 13 deals that are callable over the next 12 months. We don't necessarily want to put those on longer tenors if we do intend to call them and have to potentially pay a breakup fee. So I think we will keep those short. I think the financing, those are money-good assets. and the counterparties that are financing them are comfortable financing them for longer tenors too and work with us in the event we would call those. So that's a bulk of the 46%. The remaining assets are legacy assets that in the event we needed to raise some liquidity through sales of non-agency assets, it gives us the ability to do so. So we want to keep those intentionally short. And when I say short, I mean three to six months of financing still.

Okay, got it, thank you. And then Rob, I think you might have just answered this, but can you clarify sort of what the drivers of book value were, the book value change were this quarter, you know, in light of the fact that it seemed like credit spreads, broadly speaking, seemed to tighten a decent amount for a lot of asset classes?

Sure, Trevor. As I mentioned, the liability side of our balance sheet, which we do mark, was up, at a higher clip or higher basis than the asset side. But the other piece is the convertible issue that we raised in April that had a pretty big impact this quarter. Obviously, it was fantastic for liquidity and having that much cash on our balance sheet during distress was really important for us. But when you look at that from a book value perspective, The convert alone reduced book value by about $1.22 a share, and we also have a capped call in place that reduced it further by about 15 cents. We have not, you know, triggered the capped call or, you know, picked up our options on that, so we could have a little bit of recovery of book value there. But, you know, the convert did have a material impact on book value this quarter.

Okay, you're right. Thank you for that.

And with that, we are showing no further audio questions. I will now hand the conference back over to Matt for closing remarks.

Well, thank you for participating in the second quarter 2020 Earnings Call for Primary Investment. We look forward to speaking to you in November. Thank you.

This does conclude today's conference call. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your line.