This conference call transcript was computer generated and almost certianly contains errors. This transcript is provided for information purposes only.EarningsCall, LLC makes no representation about the accuracy of the aforementioned transcript, and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the information provided by the transcript.
spk00: Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Clearwater Papers second quarter 2021 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star 1 on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference may be recorded. Thank you. And if you require any further assistance, you may press star zero. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Mr. Sloan Boland, Investor Relations. Sir, the floor is yours.
spk01: Thank you, Joanna. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining Clearwater Papers' second quarter 2021 earnings conference call. Joining me on the call today are Arsene Kitsch, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mike Murphy, Chief Financial Officer. Financial results for the second quarter of 2021 were released shortly after today's market close, along with the filing of our 10-Q. You will find a presentation of supplemental information, including a slide providing the company's current outlook, posted on the Investor Relations page of our website at clearwaterpaper.com. Additionally, we will be providing certain non-GAAP information in this afternoon's discussion. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP information to comparable GAAP information is included in the press release and in the supplemental information provided on our website. Please note slide two of our supplemental information covering forward-looking statements. Rather than reread this slide, we are going to incorporate it by reference into our prepared remarks. With that, let me turn the call over to Arson.
spk02: Good afternoon and thank you for joining us today. Please turn to slide three. As you saw from our press release, the financial performance for the second quarter was better than our expectations. On a consolidated basis, the company reported net sales for the second quarter of $406 million and adjusted EBITDA of $15 million. A few highlights to mention. Our paperboard business continued to see strong demand. Based on that strong demand, we implemented previously announced price increases across our SBS portfolio. We successfully completed our largest major maintenance outage of 2021 in April at our Lewiston, Idaho mill, which impacted the business by $22 million. As previously discussed, our tissue business saw lower shipments reflecting market trends. Consumers destocked their pantries and retailers worked through elevated inventory levels. Both industry data and our own sales orders point to a bottoming out of shipments in April. We started seeing a recovery in May. With a decrease in orders and elevated pull price levels, we took downtime on our tissue assets to meet demand and reduce inventories, which impacted our fixed cost absorption. We also announced an indefinite closure of a NENA Wisconsin tissue mill and an exit from the away-from-home tissue market. these actions will result in a lower overall cost structure of our tissue business. In comparing the first quarter to second quarter 2021, raw material inflation was largely offset by the previously announced price increases in SBS and MIX. And finally, we maintained ample liquidity of $297 million at quarter end and reduced net debt by $4 million. As noted during previous quarters, We remain focused on our top priorities during COVID, the health and safety of our people, and safely operating our assets to service customers. We're monitoring the latest trends and are adjusting protocols and policies to keep our people safe. Let's discuss some additional details about both of our businesses. Please turn to slide four so that I can share a few comments on our paperboard business. As you recall, we estimate that approximately two-thirds of paperboard demand is derived from products that are more recession resilient, and one-third is driven by more economically sensitive or discretionary products. We continue to experience strong demand from our folding card customers and a recovery in food service segments. Demand for food packaging products and retail paper plates has remained healthy throughout the pandemic. We're also pleased with the market reception of our sustainability-focused brands of Nouveau Cup and Remagine Folding Carton. Both are playing a role in our favorable market position, and our order books continue to be robust. We are diligently working to implement the previously announced price increases. Since the beginning of this year, Fast Markets Recy, a third-party industry publication, recognized price increases that total $130 per ton in folding carton and $100 per ton in cup, including the latest increases in July of $30 per ton in folding and $50 per ton in cup. Typically, it takes us up to two quarters before realizing most of these price changes in our financials. We will discuss the estimated impact to our 2021 results later in our comments. We completed our largest planned maintenance outage for 2021 during the second quarter. The economic impact from this outage to our adjusted EBITDA was $22 million within our previously discussed range of $21 and $24 million. My thanks to our Lewiston team for safely completing this important outage on time and on budget. Please turn to slide five with some additional comments on our tissue business. Our industry view remains largely the same. The market for tissue in the US is traditionally two thirds at home and one third away from home with around 10 million tons per year of total demand. As consumers spend more time at home in 2020, there was a shift towards at home consumption. Throughout the pandemic, we witnessed consumer pantry loading and retailers responding by placing higher orders with existing suppliers and seeking out tertiary suppliers, both domestic and international, to meet demand. We believe that this could have led to more than a month of excess inventory in the supply chain by the end of 2020. Let me share some data and context pertaining to demand trends that we witnessed in the first half of this year. Consumers started to return to a more normal lifestyle in Q1 and Q2 as vaccines were becoming available and restrictions were being eased. This led to a reduction of at-home tissue purchases and destocking of consumer pantries. Based on IRI market data, consumer purchases based on dollar sales bottomed out in March. Due to these consumer trends, retailers were faced with higher inventories in Q1 and into Q2. In response, they reduced orders to manage their inventories. Based on Fast Market's RACI data, retailer shipments of finished goods bottomed out in April. This is consistent with our order patterns. Both external data and our own internal order patterns are indicating that we're in a demand recovery period, which we believe will continue for balance of the year. We believe the industry's long-term trends are healthy, and we expect continued growth in overall consumption and private brands continuing to gain share. Let me provide some additional detail on our tissue volume trends. We shipped 10.2 million cases in the second quarter, which was down approximately 36% and 13% compared to the second quarter of 2020 and first quarter of 2021, respectively. Our low point for shipments was 3.1 million cases in April. Since then, we've had more month-over-month growth in May and June. We expect this improvement trend to continue throughout the fourth quarter. We're also closely monitoring channel and customer trends to ensure that we're aligned with areas in the market with the highest long-term growth potential. To adjust to reduce demand, high inventory levels, and high pull prices, we took significant asset downtime in the second quarter, which negatively impacted our profitability. We will continue to manage our production levels in Q3 and Q4 to service demand, reduce inventory, and minimize cost. Additionally, in the second quarter, we announced the indefinite closure of our Neenah, Wisconsin site, with production ceasing in July. While our people in Neenah operated the site well, the assets were not economically viable. Retail volume from Neenah is being shifted to other lower-cost facilities, such as our Shelby, North Carolina mill. By closing NENA, we're also exiting the away-from-home market, where we had a small and subscale position. While the decision was the right one for the business, it is difficult on our people and the NENA community. I would like to thank them for their commitment to each other, our customers, and Clearwater Paper over the last 10 years. With that, I'll turn it over to Mike to discuss our second quarter results, including the impact from the NENA closure.
spk01: Thank you, Arson. Please turn to slide six. The Consolidated Company Summary Income Statement shows second quarter 2021, the second quarter 2020, and the first half of each year. In the second quarter of 2021, our net loss was $52 million. Diluted net loss per share was $3.10, and adjusted loss per share of $1.07. The adjustments incorporate the impacts from the NENA site closure as well as other adjustments. The impact of the NENA closure activities in the quarter was $41.7 million. The non-cash portion of the charge, $36.9 million, was primarily a fixed asset impairment, but also included inventory and other reserves. The cash portion of the charge was for employee pay during a worn notification period and severance-related expenses of $4.9 million. We anticipate that we will have similar employee-related cash expenses in the third quarter, slightly above $4 million. These estimates reflect our VEST assessment at this time, and we will update them as appropriate as we monetize the assets at NEMA. The corresponding segment results are on slide 7. Our paperboard business completed a major maintenance outage in the second quarter of 2021 that impacted us by $22 million. while consumer products saw lower production and demand in our comments during the second quarter we mentioned that our adjusted EBITDA could be close to break even for the second quarter of 2021 to the relative to the first quarter of 2021 adjusted EBITDA 54 million with 15 million of adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter we came in better than our initial expectations The improved performance relative to expectations included the impact of the NENA closure, slightly better tissue demand, cost mitigation efforts, and better SBS price realization. Slide eight is a year-over-year adjusted EBITDA comparison for our pulp and paper board business in the second quarter. We have and are continuing to implement the previously announced price increases as well as experiencing some positive mixed benefits with similar sales volumes as last year. Our costs were impacted by the major maintenance outage of $22 million, as well as inflation in raw material inputs and freight. You can review a comparison of our second quarter 2021 performance relative to first quarter 2021 performance on slide 14 in the appendix. Please turn to slide 9, where we provide a year-over-year comparison of the second quarter, which represented what we believe is a bottom in tissue shipments in 2021 and peak shipments in 2022, sorry, 2020. Price and mix were a limited part of the story for tissue. Our sales of converted product in the second quarter were 10.2 million cases, representing a unit decline of 36% versus prior year. Our production of converted product in the quarter was 9.6 million cases, or down 40% versus the prior year. With the actions that we took at NENA, drawdown of inventory, and lower incentive comp accruals in SG&A, we were able to partially offset some of the raw material inflationary headwinds. We anticipate the financial impact from raw material inflation will increase in the coming quarters. You can review a comparison of our second quarter 2021 performance relative to the first quarter of 2020 on slide 15 in the appendix. We also have finished goods production and other financial data on a quarterly basis on slide 16 for both businesses. Slide 10 outlines our capital structure. Our liquidity was $296.5 million at the end of the second quarter. With the cash flow headwinds of the second quarter behind us, we believe we will generate more free cash flow in the back half of 2021 to further reduce our net debt. Maintenance financial covenants do not present a material constraint on our financial flexibility, and we do not have near-term debt maturities. Slide 11 provides perspective on our third quarter outlook and other key drivers for full year 2021. Our expectations assume that we continue to operate our assets without significant COVID-related disruptions. As previously discussed, demand, visibility, and tissue, as well as inflation expectations, have and will continue to be unpredictable. I would like to focus my comments for the third quarter expected adjusted EBITDA of $40 to $48 million and build up to that range from our second quarter adjusted EBITDA of $15 million. The planned major maintenance outage at Lewiston in April is behind us with a negative impact of $22 million. And we recently completed the planned outage at Cypress Bend this past weekend with an anticipated impact of $3 to $5 million. The difference of the adjusted EBITDA impact between the second and third quarters results in an expected increase of adjusted EBITDA of $17 to $19 million. Previously, announced SBS pricing is expected to positively impact us during the quarter by 9 to 11 million. We estimate that raw material cost inflation will negatively impact our business by 9 to 13 million in the third quarter relative to the second quarter. When comparing the second quarter to our expectations to the third quarter, we believe their previously announced SBS price increase could largely offset raw material inflation. Tissue shipments are expected to grow by 10 to 15% relative to the 10.2 million cases shipped in the second quarter. We shipped 3.7 million cases in July relative to our average monthly shipments of 3.4 million in the second quarter and our low point of 3.1 million cases in April. The recovery in tissue shipments is occurring and we expect it to continue through the rest of 2021. As we expect to reduce inventories, we anticipate production being slightly below demand. With the closure of NENA, we are exiting the away from home tissue business, which was approximately 100,000 to 150,000 cases per month, and will mildly impact our converted shipment volume trend lines and comparisons. We will also receive the benefits during the third quarter from the NENA closure. While we are not providing specific annual guidance for 2021, there are several drivers, assumptions, and variables we'd like to provide to you with an update relative to 2020. We're expecting continued positive impact from the previously announced SPS price increases. We're expected to result in year-over-year benefits of $40 to $45 million. In our paper board business, planned major maintenance outages are expected to reduce our earnings for 2021 compared to 2020 by $25 to $27 million, which is down from our previous guidance. We are moving our head box project at Lewiston from the third quarter of 2021 into 2022 to accommodate our strong paper board demand. We have updated our guidance, including some adjustments to 2022 on slide 20, which reflects our current plan. Our current view is that our tissue volume decline year over year will be above 20%, which is not adjusted for the impact of our exit from the away from home business. In total, From 2020 to 2021, input cost inflation, including bulk, packaging, energy, chemicals, and freight, is expected to be $60 to $70 million relative to our previous estimate of $65 to $75 million. The majority of this inflation is in bulk. The NENA site recently generated negative adjusted EBITDA, and by closing the site, we will avoid these losses and lower our overall cost structure by moving production to other sites. These actions will also help fully realize the benefits of the Shelby investment. In total, the benefit on a combined basis is expected to exceed $10 million annually, with full benefit realization occurring in the fourth quarter. For the full year 2021, we are also anticipating the following. We expect interest expense between $36 and $38 million, appreciation and amortization between $104 and $108 million, capital expenditures between $50 and $55 million, which is slightly lower than prior expectations, and our effective tax rate is expected to be slightly higher than previous expectations at 26% to 27%. Let me turn the call back over to Harsin.
spk02: Thanks, Mike. I would like to reiterate my comments from last quarter regarding the actions that we're taking across the company to proactively address our market-driven headwinds and tailwinds. In our paperboard business, we're benefiting from the implementation of previously announced price increases and are maximizing production to meet demand. This includes moving some maintenance and a head box installation from 2021 to 2022. In our tissue business, we're working with customers to offset higher costs through product and other changes. In addition to the market recovering tissue demand, we're focused on growing our volume through various sales initiatives. that have been discussed in previous quarters. Across both businesses, we're taking steps to reduce both short and long-term costs. As previously discussed, we continue to focus on generating cash to reduce our net debt. Last quarter, I spoke about performance improvement efforts focused on improving core operations in the medium to long term aimed at achieving the full profit potential of Clearwater Paper over the next several years. Given the inflation and competitive pressures in our industry, we are working to find ways like this effort to combat margin compression and achieve margin expansion. We're in the planning phases currently, and I look forward to updating you when we're in the execution phase. Let me remind you of why I think these businesses are well positioned in the long run. For our paper board division, we believe that the key strengths of this business are the following. First, we operate well-invested assets with a geographic footprint enabling us to efficiently service our customers. We have a diverse customer base which serves end markets that have largely stable demand. Second, not being vertically integrated enables us to focus on independent customers with unparalleled service and quality commitment. We believe through product and brand development the business is well positioned to take advantage of trends towards more sustainable packaging and food service products. Lastly, our paperboard business has demonstrated an ability to generate good margins and solid cash flows. Our consumer products division is a leader within the growing private branded tissue market. From our vantage point, we believe the key strengths of this business are the following. We have a national footprint with an ability to supply a wide range of product categories and quality tiers, which is an attractive sales proposition to our customers. Our expertise in manufacturing, supply chain, and transportation is a key differentiator. Second, there are long-term trends away from branded products to private brands. Private brand tissue share in the US rose to over 30% recently, up from 18% in 2011. While these trends are impressive, we're still a long way from where many European countries are, where private brands represent over half of total tissue share. Lastly, tissue is an economically resilient and need-based product. Historically, demand has not been negatively impacted by economic uncertainty. After we get beyond the COVID-related distortions in the market, we're optimistic that this business will generate meaningful cash flows over the long run. We're committed to improving our business to be successful both in the near and long term, and we believe that we will come out of 2021 a better and stronger operation than where we started. Our balance sheet is well positioned to support us with strong liquidity, limited financial maintenance covenants, and debt maturities which are a few years away. We're working with our board to develop a medium to long term capital allocation plan. We look forward to sharing more on these ideas, which include internal investments, external investments, and return of capital to shareholders as we get closer to our 2.5x target leverage ratio. In closing, I would like to thank our people for all that they do to keep our operations running safely and efficiently and for servicing our customers. I also want to thank our shareholders for their continued support. So with that, we will end our prepared remarks and take your questions.
spk00: Thank you, speakers. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, I would like to remind everyone that in order to ask a question, please press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. Once again, you may press star one to ask a question. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the P&A roster. Your first question is from Adam Josephson of KeyBank Capital Markets. Your line is open.
spk01: Arson and Mike, good afternoon. Hope you're well. Good afternoon, Adam. A few for me. One on your inflation expectation for the year. It came down a smidge, about $5 million. Is that pulp, Mike, or arson, or is that something else? Just wondering what the moving parts there are. So I think we had offsetting factors within pulp, freight, and some other items, and then some benefit actually on wood fiber in the Pacific Northwest area. So, that's kind of how things have changed around a little bit, and we're slightly better from an inflation standpoint. Male Speaker 1 Got it. Okay. And on the SBS commentary, sequentially, so I think your commentary, Mike, implies about a $50 a ton sequential price increase in SBS. Just based on what the trade publication has recognized, and your price lags, how much more can we expect 3Q to 4Q, above and beyond that 50 that seems to be happening 2Q to 3Q? So, you know, I think you're heading down the right path, that we do have some sequential improvement from third quarter to fourth quarter. And as you do the buildup, you know, first quarter to second quarter was – Just below $6 million, we have some pulp price improvement happening there. And then you have the second to third quarter within the guide. And you can go from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. So we can work through the math offline. But that will build up to the $40 to $45. And there's some nice sequential improvements occurring. Got it. And I appreciate that, Mike. Arson, one on tissue. I mean, you mentioned that once you get past the COVID distortions, hopefully you'll be on a path toward greater cash flow and thought occurred to me, which is if I annualize your first half consumer products EBITDA, you'd be at 82 million. And that basically is in line with your average from 2016 to 2019. And in fact, the distortion was really last year when tissue EBITDA tripled because of COVID. And it seems like this year is actually more normal when I look at history. Is there a reason you would have me think otherwise?
spk02: Adam, you're taking two quarters that I think are both somewhat unusual. So Q1, I think, still had some impact from COVID, and Q2 had us taking down our production pretty substantially with a pretty major hit. with our fixed cost absorption, as well as some of the higher poll prices that we're seeing. So I think as we get into the third and the fourth quarter, I think there'll be a better representation of a tissue baseline post-COVID. If we think longer term, we're focused on a few things, Adam. So first and foremost, it's getting the benefit from the Shelby investment. So part of... Part of achieving that benefit was our announced closure of NENA to improve our overall tissue cost structure. We're also focused on improving our volume base to fully utilize our assets. So we've had a lot of variable quarters over the last year, year and a half, and look forward to getting some stability and focus as we approach the rest of the year.
spk01: I appreciate that. And just one last one back to SBS, which is it? I think you've been at capacity in that business for a while. I think your shipments were down about 1% in the first half, despite very strong industry demand. Any thoughts about the need to add capacity in that business in the near future or longer-term future, just given what your outlook is for that business? Yeah, I think, Adam, part of our longer-term capital plan involves a number of different projects. I think in the industry there's the notion that you should get a little bit of volume increase year over year, and we'll continue to look at that. As you're aware about our system, we do have excess pulp capacity at the Lewiston site, so that might be an easier site for us to achieve some smaller capacity increases at. Terrific. Thanks, Mike.
spk00: Thank you. Your next question is from the line of Mark Wild or Will from Bank of Montreal. Your line is open.
spk01: Yeah, pretty close. Hello, Mark. Just to follow on Adam's last question, just in terms of SVS. You've got a really interesting position with the non-integrated garden players. If you could put your hands on more capacity, could you move more volume through that channel?
spk02: I think if we look at the last several quarters, we're in a position where we're oversold, and we are trying hard to service our existing customers. and allocate product. Certainly, there are opportunities in the market in the long run for us to grow if we're able to move up our capacity in SDS.
spk01: Okay. All right. Last quarter, you gave us kind of the month-to-month-to-month in terms of the tissue shipments. Is it possible to get that for May and June and then also what you've seen in July or some
spk02: Yeah, so I think for July, I have the data handy. We saw about 3.7 million cases in July versus an average of 3.4 in Q2 and a low point of 3.1 in March. So we're seeing We're seeing sequential growth in our retail business. July was a bit impacted by our exit from away from home as well. So that's a small impact, but it does have some consequence on our costs.
spk01: Do you have any visibility just in terms of backlogs and what August looks like?
spk02: We typically have orders in our system as we start the month. Lead times on tissue can vary depending on customer, but it's a bit different from the paper board market where you have backlogs. We essentially get tissue orders and have a certain amount of time to deliver them. So August is looking reasonably healthy, and I think we'll continue to see the recovery.
spk01: Okay. Mike, is it possible for you to give us a little bit more color on what's in that $9 to $13 million of sequential input inflation in the third quarter? Again, I'd say it's mostly pulp that's hitting us in the quarter, but freight's picked up in a big way. So those are the two key drivers of our inflation expectations quarter over quarter. So I'm just curious because there, you know, been a lot of widespread, you know, reports of pulp starting to ease in the trade press. And, you know, I wonder whether you're starting to see any advantage there. I think it's even showing up in the hardwood market. And I think probably what you buy is mostly, like, bleached eucalyptus. Yes. Reflecting back on Adam's question, we do see inflation coming off a bit in pulp, really in the fourth quarter. And this is more accounting fund in terms of when you actually buy the pulp to when you actually sell it. There's probably at least a quarter delay that we have flowing through our P&L.
spk02: And, Mark, just to provide you a bit more context, if you look at the receipt, so March BEK was around $1,100, $1,140 a ton. In June and July, it's around $1,360. So to Mike's point, there is a lag in when we recognize the cost impact that rolls through our system. So that's happening here in Q2 and to Q3.
spk01: Yeah, and just to be clear, Arson, for everybody that's on the call here, those represent list prices, not actual prices paid, correct, after kind of discounts?
spk02: Correct. Absolutely right. So the typical structure, it's a 3C list. with a negotiated discount, and that resets on a monthly basis.
spk01: Yeah, okay. And then are you seeing any activity in terms of tissue pricing, or do you think that this, you know, recent stories about kind of pulp weakness have kind of pulled the rug out from under that issue for now?
spk02: You know, I think what we said before, Mark, is in both markets, price is determined by supply and demand. So if you look at current market dynamics in paperboard, they're quite favorable. I'd say less so in tissue with the slowdown that we've seen and some of the curtailments that we've had to take on our assets. On top of that, you can look at some of the new capacity additions that are coming online in tissue. There's 150,000, 160,000 tons of private branded TAD capacity that's coming online this year. And while if you look at the overall market of 10 million tons, That's a relatively small number, but it's a more consequential number for the private brand.
spk01: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, okay. Just two last ones. How is your inventory at the end of June in tissue relative to where you'd like it to be optimally?
spk02: We're still higher. So we reduced our inventory by, off the top of my head, 15% to 20% from our peak. But there's still more to go. And as Mike mentioned, we're going to continue to manage our production schedules for balance of the year to manage down our inventory.
spk01: Is that an issue that gets taken care of in the third quarter, or is that something you see kind of carrying into the fourth quarter or just too hard to call at this point?
spk02: I think it's a little difficult to call in this quarter, especially with our announcement on NENA as we rebalance our system. But the team is working hard to manage our inventories down, especially with these elevated pull prices.
spk01: Yeah, okay. And then the last one. Is there any way for you to kind of quantify for us how much runway will be left at Shelby, particularly if we kind of take into account the NENA closure?
spk02: So what we said is we will ramp Shelby converting by the end of this year, and I think we are progressing. So there's still some upside in capacity in Shelby. If we step back and you look at our overall capacity, and you look at last year as a proxy for our capacity as we're running full out, I think we produced and sold about 60 million cases. So as the NENA assets come out of our system, that probably represents around 15% of our converting capacity. So we'll be running probably around 90% utilization and looking to expand our capacity and sales through operational improvements here in the next couple of years.
spk01: Okay, that's super helpful. Thanks, Arjun. Good luck in that second half of the year. Thank you, Mark.
spk00: Your next question is from the line of Paul Quinn of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.
spk02: Yeah, thanks guys. Good afternoon. Just just trying to figure it on the tissue side.
spk01: This or pick up in in shipment volume. So you did tend to in Q2 the tree one in April. Looks like the is it sort of a linear growth like 300,000 cases per month for May, June and then do I take that July 373.7 million cases and add and had at 150,000 cases for the away from home for Dino?
spk02: I think what we mentioned is we expect 10% to 15% growth in tissue volume quarter over quarter. And so we did just over 10 million cases in Q2. So if you apply 10% to 15%, I think you can get to the average run rate in Q3.
spk01: Paul, on the 3.7 for July, there is still some volume, some sales going into the away-from-home market, and we're in the process of winding down the production there that happened very early in July. and then getting the finished goods out. So we just have a little bit of noise in the numbers looking at going from June to July. We'll begin to have a little noise in the numbers going from July to August. But we think we're on a pretty good trend line here. It's going to flatten out as we move forward through the rest of the year. I think what we saw going from April to May was a reaction of the retailers having cleaned out their supply chains and getting back to a normal order cycle. And now I suspect what we're seeing is just consumers getting back to buying to their consumption as they work down their pantries and what they stocked up last year. Okay, that's helpful. Maybe just on the paperboard side, you've got the slide 20, which is the maintenance schedule. Do you have any idea what you're going to do in 2023? Paul, we're working on that now, and we'll come out when we're ready with that. We did move some stuff around into 2022, including that Lewiston head box project, and we feel good about the 2022 number. Okay, so, well, maybe you asked it another way. Do both machines have to go down in 2023, or is it just one?
spk02: I think we'll clarify that here in the coming quarters.
spk01: Okay, and then I think I recall seeing something on, you guys have a, on the Lewiston, that would be my dog, on the Lewiston Digester issue and a lawsuit. Can you update us on what's happening there? So, Yes, we have filed a claim there. I don't think that there's anything to update on that. Arson, do you want to?
spk02: Yeah, I think there's some unsettled issues regarding the continuous digester and the polysulfide equipment. So we're working through that, discussing that with the manufacturer of that equipment. So at this point, we don't have a whole lot more to add about possible claims.
spk01: Okay. Any idea on timing of that?
spk02: Not at this time.
spk01: Okay. Any idea on expectation to hit the net debt target at two and a half times when you foresee yourself getting in a position that you're close to that? Yeah, I... I think what we want to do, Paul, is just get a better sense for how the rest of this year and next year is going to play out before providing commentary there. But we're continuing to make some progress in reducing the leverage that we have on the balance sheet. Great. All right. That's all I had. Thank you, Paul. Thank you.
spk00: Once again, if you would like to ask a question, you may press star 1 on your telephone keypad. Your next question is from the line of Adam Josephson from T-Bank Capital Market. Your line is open.
spk01: Thanks, Arson, Mike, for taking my follow-up. Just on the CapEx guidance, you reduced it by $5 million. It's obviously below your normalized level of $60 million, and the first half level was only $21 million. Can you just talk about what's happening with your CapEx and what you're, I guess it's too early to talk about next year, but I presume you'd be at or above that $60 million next year based on what's happening this year.
spk02: Adam, we are in the process of working through a multi-year capital plan to understand our base needs as well as what opportunities we have to improve our cost structure. I think what you're seeing this year is a little bit of that is due to shifting some installations into next year just to maximize paperboard production. Frankly, what you're also seeing is probably Mike and I providing a bit more scrutiny on our capital spending, but I don't think there's anything major happening this year in order to curtail capital spending across our system.
spk01: I appreciate it. Arsene, you mentioned where your tissue inventories are and partly whittling down your inventories further, but also perhaps waiting for pull prices to come down further. Just wondering how much of a role your view on pull prices plays in your willingness to to ramp up production again. I would think that the two are very much related in the sense that as tissue demand has weakened, pulp demand has done the same, and it's no coincidence that pulp prices have been falling for the last two, three months or so. Can you just talk about the interplay between pulp prices and your inclination to produce?
spk02: I would say the primary driver on production is demand, and the secondary is then inventory levels within our system. At some point, making inventory and paying to move it and store it beyond a certain level that's required doesn't make any sense. The pull pricing is adding to that equation. It makes even less sense at really high pull prices. So it's certainly a factor, but our production historically tends to be reflective of our demand with more moderate fluctuations in inventory. But where we've been here the last couple of quarters, we saw an upswing, and then we took some pretty dramatic steps to curtail production to manage inventory in light of the pull prices that we're seeing or are seeing.
spk01: Yeah. No, I totally understand. And just given, I might have missed your comments about where you think industry inventories are. I know yours are still above where you'd like them to be. Just with the Delta variant gathering steam domestically, just wondering what the possibility is of another restocking cycle, or are we well past that point and inventories are too high for that to really matter? I'm just wondering what your thoughts are along those lines.
spk02: You know, it's hard to predict where this is going to go. This is still pretty fresh, and we're working with our sales team to see what our customer patterns are and consumer patterns are here with the Delta variant. There's another dynamic that we're also watching, and this is around the channel mix. So we, as Clearwater, have historically been more geared towards the grocery channel. And if you look back at history, we were more than three-quarters in grocery We're probably just over half in grocery at this point. That benefited us pretty significantly last year with the grocery channel picking up. The first couple quarters of this year, the channel has lost some share to club en masse. So in addition to what consumers are going to do, it's also about what do the channels do and what kind of trends do we see in our channels and how does that impact our business. So there's a few variables at play here around volume for the second half.
spk01: And why has that happened year to date, Arson, to the best of your knowledge, that groceries lost that much here to club and mass?
spk02: If you think about last year with the lockdowns, I think a lot of people rediscovered their neighborhood grocery store as a quick way to get into a smaller footprint retailer to buy their products. I think this year there's been a reversal of that. There have been long-term historical trends more towards mass and club, and we've done a lot of work over the last five to ten years to shift our channel mix to some of those growth channels as well. But we're still more heavily represented in growth street than I think the market is.
spk01: I appreciate that. And just one last one for me, or perhaps, Mike, three Q to four Q. So obviously maintenance will be down a little bit. and you'll likely get more SPS pricing just based on what's already been recognized. Anything sequentially in terms of inflation, 3Q to 4Q, based on your full-year guidance that we should expect, or any other moving parts, 3Q to 4Q, that I should be mindful of? I think on inflation, I hope we're hitting our apex here in the third quarter, and that we'll be maybe neutral third quarter to fourth quarter. I think sequentially our expectation is tissue volumes to continue to grow throughout the remainder of this year, albeit at maybe a slower growth rate than coming off of that April bottom. I think those are probably the couple key variables to think about for the remainder of the year. Got it. Thanks so much, Mike.
spk00: Thank you. Speakers, I am not seeing any other questions. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining.
Disclaimer